Home / Leagues / AFL / 1963

1963 AFL Season

56 regular-season games · 3 playoff teams

Final

Champion

San Diego Chargers

1st Title

Runner-Up

Boston Patriots

1st Appearance

Biggest Overachiever

San Diego Chargers

2.89 wins above expected

11 wins · 8.11 expected wins

Biggest Disappointment

Denver Broncos

2.42 wins below expected

2 wins · 4.92 expected wins

Final Standings

Final regular season records. The vsSim column shows actual wins minus the simulation's mean wins - positive values indicate the team overachieved, negative values mean they underperformed.

# Team W L T Pct GB PF PA PD SimW vsSim
1 Boston Patriots Division 7 6 1 .536 - 327 257 +70 8.26 -0.76
2 Buffalo Bills Playoffs 7 6 1 .536 - 304 291 +13 6.87 +0.63
3 Houston Oilers 6 8 0 .429 1.5 302 372 -70 6.99 -0.99
4 New York Jets 5 8 1 .393 2 249 399 -150 5.94 -0.44
# Team W L T Pct GB PF PA PD SimW vsSim
1 San Diego Chargers Division 11 3 0 .786 - 399 255 +144 8.11 +2.89
2 Oakland Raiders 10 4 0 .714 1 363 282 +81 7.39 +2.61
3 Kansas City Chiefs 5 7 2 .429 5 347 263 +84 7.52 -1.52
4 Denver Broncos 2 11 1 .179 8.5 301 473 -172 4.92 -2.42

Playoff Bracket

Division Playoff

Boston Patriots 26
Buffalo Bills 8

Dec 28

AFL Championship Game

San Diego Chargers 51
Boston Patriots 10

Jan 5

Season Summary

Every team's regular season finish compared against the simulated win totals. Click on any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual total minus the simulation's mean. Positive values indicate the team outperformed the expected total; negative values indicate the team was unluckier than expected. Percentile represents where their actual result fell in the simulated distribution.

Team Conference Division Elo Actual Avg. Wins Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
San Diego Chargers West 1688 11 8.11 +2.89 98.62% 1 5 7 8 9 11 14
Oakland Raiders West 1636 10 7.39 +2.61 97.98% 0 4 6 7 8 10 14
Boston Patriots East 1558 7.5 8.26 -0.76 62.07% 0 5 7 8 9 11 14
Buffalo Bills East 1552 7.5 6.87 +0.63 86.72% 0 4 5 7 8 9 13
Kansas City Chiefs West 1524 6 7.52 -1.52 56.55% 0 4 6 7 8 10 13
Houston Oilers East 1440 6 6.99 -0.99 45.73% 0 4 6 7 8 9 13
New York Jets East 1331 5.5 5.94 -0.44 69.79% 0 3 4 6 7 8 13
Denver Broncos West 1270 2.5 4.92 -2.42 24.97% 0 2 4 5 6 7 13

Head-to-Head

Cells show each team's record against each opponent with the expected wins from the simulation below Gold-tinted cells indicate the team beat the model's expectations by more than a half-win while navy-tinted cells indicate they fell short by more than a half-win. The first table covers within-division games while the second covers games against teams outside the division.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Within East

Team Patriots Bills Oilers Jets
Boston Patriots
1-1
(1.1 exp.)
2-0
(0.9 exp.)
1-1
(1.1 exp.)
Buffalo Bills
1-1
(0.8 exp.)
0-2
(0.9 exp.)
2-0
(1.2 exp.)
Houston Oilers
0-2
(0.9 exp.)
2-0
(1.0 exp.)
1-1
(1.2 exp.)
New York Jets
1-1
(0.8 exp.)
0-2
(0.7 exp.)
1-1
(0.7 exp.)

East vs. Outside Teams

Team Broncos Chiefs Raiders Chargers
Boston Patriots
1-1
(1.3 exp.)
0-1-1
(1.4 exp.)
2-0
(1.0 exp.)
0-2
(1.0 exp.)
Buffalo Bills
2-0
(1.3 exp.)
1-0-1
(0.5 exp.)
1-1
(0.9 exp.)
0-2
(0.9 exp.)
Houston Oilers
2-0
(1.1 exp.)
1-1
(0.9 exp.)
0-2
(0.9 exp.)
0-2
(0.5 exp.)
New York Jets
1-0-1
(1.0 exp.)
1-1
(0.8 exp.)
1-1
(0.9 exp.)
0-2
(0.8 exp.)

Within West

Team Broncos Chiefs Raiders Chargers
Denver Broncos
0-2
(0.8 exp.)
0-2
(0.4 exp.)
1-1
(0.5 exp.)
Kansas City Chiefs
2-0
(1.1 exp.)
0-2
(0.9 exp.)
0-2
(1.2 exp.)
Oakland Raiders
2-0
(1.5 exp.)
2-0
(1.0 exp.)
2-0
(0.7 exp.)
San Diego Chargers
1-1
(1.4 exp.)
2-0
(0.7 exp.)
0-2
(1.2 exp.)

West vs. Outside Teams

Team Patriots Bills Oilers Jets
Denver Broncos
1-1
(0.6 exp.)
0-2
(0.6 exp.)
0-2
(0.8 exp.)
0-1-1
(0.9 exp.)
Kansas City Chiefs
1-0-1
(0.5 exp.)
0-1-1
(1.4 exp.)
1-1
(1.0 exp.)
1-1
(1.1 exp.)
Oakland Raiders
0-2
(0.9 exp.)
1-1
(1.0 exp.)
2-0
(1.0 exp.)
1-1
(0.9 exp.)
San Diego Chargers
2-0
(0.9 exp.)
2-0
(1.0 exp.)
2-0
(1.4 exp.)
2-0
(1.1 exp.)

Scoreline Distribution

Cells represent the percentage of games that ended with a team's points in the row and its opponent's points in the column. Cells below the diagonal are wins (gold), and cells above are losses (blue). Totals along the edges show the marginal percentages for that row or column.

Win Loss Same range
↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–61.79%0.89%0.89%0.89%1.79%6.25%
7–131.79%3.57%5.36%4.46%1.79%1.79%18.75%
14–200.89%5.36%7.14%2.68%1.79%2.68%1.79%22.32%
21–270.89%4.46%2.68%3.57%3.57%2.68%1.79%19.64%
28–341.79%1.79%3.57%3.57%0.89%1.79%13.39%
35–410.89%2.68%2.68%0.89%1.79%8.93%
42+1.79%1.79%1.79%1.79%1.79%1.79%10.71%
Total6.25%18.75%22.32%19.64%13.39%8.93%10.71%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 23.14 23.14 +0.00
SD 13.66 13.66 19.19
CV 0.59 0.59
Max 59 59 +52
Min 0 0 -52

Games Played: 56

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–67.14%7.14%14.29%
7–1314.29%14.29%
14–207.14%14.29%21.43%
21–277.14%14.29%21.43%
28–34
35–417.14%7.14%14.29%
42+7.14%7.14%14.29%
Total7.14%14.29%35.71%14.29%21.43%7.14%100%

Boston Patriots — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 23.36 18.36 +5.00
SD 13.99 9.74 17.55
CV 0.60 0.53
Max 46 35 +42
Min 3 3 -32

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–137.14%14.29%7.14%28.57%
14–207.14%14.29%7.14%28.57%
21–277.14%7.14%14.29%
28–347.14%7.14%14.29%
35–417.14%7.14%
42+7.14%7.14%
Total7.14%7.14%28.57%28.57%21.43%7.14%100%

Buffalo Bills — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 21.71 20.79 +0.93
SD 10.74 9.41 13.20
CV 0.49 0.45
Max 45 35 +31
Min 7 0 -18

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–137.14%7.14%7.14%21.43%
14–207.14%7.14%7.14%7.14%28.57%
21–277.14%7.14%7.14%21.43%
28–347.14%7.14%14.29%
35–417.14%7.14%
42+7.14%7.14%
Total7.14%14.29%14.29%21.43%21.43%21.43%100%

Denver Broncos — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 21.50 33.79 -12.29
SD 11.66 14.84 17.86
CV 0.54 0.44
Max 50 59 +16
Min 7 10 -52

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–67.14%7.14%14.29%
7–137.14%7.14%14.29%
14–2014.29%7.14%21.43%
21–27
28–347.14%14.29%14.29%7.14%42.86%
35–41
42+7.14%7.14%
Total7.14%28.57%35.71%7.14%21.43%100%

Houston Oilers — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 21.57 26.57 -5.00
SD 13.48 12.92 17.57
CV 0.62 0.49
Max 49 52 +21
Min 0 7 -42

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–67.14%7.14%
7–137.14%14.29%7.14%28.57%
14–207.14%7.14%
21–2714.29%7.14%21.43%
28–347.14%7.14%
35–417.14%7.14%
42+7.14%7.14%7.14%21.43%
Total14.29%21.43%7.14%35.71%7.14%14.29%100%

Kansas City Chiefs — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 24.79 18.79 +6.00
SD 18.43 11.81 25.74
CV 0.74 0.63
Max 59 38 +52
Min 0 0 -21

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–67.14%7.14%
7–137.14%7.14%7.14%21.43%
14–207.14%7.14%7.14%7.14%7.14%35.71%
21–277.14%7.14%7.14%21.43%
28–347.14%7.14%
35–417.14%7.14%
42+
Total7.14%14.29%14.29%14.29%7.14%14.29%28.57%100%

New York Jets — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 17.79 28.50 -10.71
SD 9.86 16.94 20.41
CV 0.55 0.59
Max 35 53 +17
Min 0 0 -48

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–67.14%7.14%
7–1314.29%14.29%
14–2014.29%14.29%
21–2721.43%21.43%
28–347.14%7.14%
35–417.14%7.14%7.14%21.43%
42+7.14%7.14%14.29%
Total42.86%21.43%14.29%14.29%7.14%100%

Oakland Raiders — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 25.93 20.14 +5.79
SD 15.83 12.01 10.53
CV 0.61 0.60
Max 52 49 +23
Min 0 7 -12

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–137.14%7.14%
14–2014.29%7.14%21.43%
21–277.14%14.29%7.14%7.14%35.71%
28–347.14%7.14%14.29%
35–417.14%7.14%
42+7.14%7.14%14.29%
Total14.29%35.71%28.57%7.14%7.14%7.14%100%

San Diego Chargers — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 28.50 18.21 +10.29
SD 14.04 14.14 17.72
CV 0.49 0.78
Max 58 50 +46
Min 7 0 -16

Games Played: 14

Wins vs. Points Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Wins plotted against points scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in wins per 10 points).

Fit Metrics

Slope
Scored 0.51 +0.4
Allowed 0.56 -0.3
Differential 0.63 +0.2

Home-Field Advantage Edge

A measure of how well each team has taken advantage of home-field advantage during the season. For each team, sum the win probabilities for home games and compare against the team's actual performance at home. Repeat for games on the road. Positive values indicate the team has played comparatively better at home than on the road. Negative values indicate the team is not utilizing home field advantage.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

The teams that deviated the most from the simulated results.

Top Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 San Diego Chargers 11 8.11 +2.89
2 Oakland Raiders 10 7.39 +2.61
3 Buffalo Bills 7.5 6.87 +0.63
4 New York Jets 5.5 5.94 -0.44
5 Boston Patriots 7.5 8.26 -0.76

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 Denver Broncos 2.5 4.92 -2.42
2 Kansas City Chiefs 6 7.52 -1.52
3 Houston Oilers 6 6.99 -0.99
4 Boston Patriots 7.5 8.26 -0.76
5 New York Jets 5.5 5.94 -0.44

Top Streaks

The most unlikely streaks achieved by teams throughout the season according to the model's probabilities. Calculated by using the pregame win/tie/loss probabilities for all the games in each team's streak.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Oakland Raiders 8 Oct 20 – Dec 22 1 in 157
2 San Diego Chargers 4 Nov 2 – Dec 1 1 in 14
3 New York Jets 3 Sep 22 – Oct 5 1 in 7
4 Denver Broncos 2 Sep 29 – Oct 6 1 in 6
5 Kansas City Chiefs 3 Dec 8 – Dec 22 1 in 6

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Kansas City Chiefs 5 Oct 13 – Nov 8 1 in 140
2 Denver Broncos 7 Nov 3 – Dec 22 1 in 23
3 Oakland Raiders 4 Sep 22 – Oct 11 1 in 14
4 Houston Oilers 4 Dec 1 – Dec 22 1 in 6
5 Boston Patriots 2 Sep 29 – Oct 5 1 in 5

Finish Position Heatmaps

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team finished in a given position in the simulation.

Team1234
Boston Patriots50.55%25.87%15.62%7.95%
Houston Oilers21.37%29.22%28.39%21.02%
Buffalo Bills19.39%27.69%28.90%24.02%
New York Jets8.70%17.22%27.08%47.00%
Team1234
San Diego Chargers42.69%30.29%20.99%6.03%
Kansas City Chiefs29.49%31.23%28.11%11.17%
Oakland Raiders25.50%31.45%32.07%10.98%
Denver Broncos2.31%7.03%18.83%71.83%
Team12345678
Boston Patriots27.77%19.73%15.60%12.30%9.56%7.52%5.09%2.44%
San Diego Chargers24.11%19.60%15.82%13.32%10.79%8.29%5.44%2.63%
Kansas City Chiefs14.35%15.86%16.27%14.93%13.52%11.47%8.60%5.01%
Oakland Raiders12.56%14.76%15.36%15.14%14.49%12.71%9.80%5.19%
Houston Oilers8.56%11.80%13.50%14.67%15.70%15.01%12.59%8.16%
Buffalo Bills8.43%10.95%12.57%14.08%14.83%15.44%13.90%9.81%
New York Jets3.45%5.48%7.68%10.23%12.95%16.44%21.76%22.01%
Denver Broncos0.77%1.82%3.21%5.33%8.17%13.12%22.82%44.76%

Win Totals in Context

How each team's actual results compared to their simulated results, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Click a division name in the legend to toggle it on or off.

Playoff Seed Probabilities

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team earned a given playoff seed in the simulation. Teams are sorted by likelihood of earning the top seed. Teams that missed the playoffs more often sit toward the bottom.

Team1 SeedMissed Playoffs
Boston Patriots50.55%49.45%
Houston Oilers21.37%78.63%
Buffalo Bills19.39%80.61%
New York Jets8.70%91.30%
Team1 SeedMissed Playoffs
San Diego Chargers42.69%57.31%
Kansas City Chiefs29.49%70.51%
Oakland Raiders25.50%74.50%
Denver Broncos2.31%97.69%

Wins Required to Clinch Each Seed

The empirical cumulative distribution that shows the probability that a team earning that seed finished the regular season with at most a given number of wins. The point where each line passes through 50% is roughly the median wins for that seed.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Percentage of games won by the home team - percentage of games won by the away team
No Edge: under 2% · Slight Edge: 2% to 6% · Clear Edge: 6% to 10% · Fortress: 10% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points that 1 point is worth. A team this many Elo ratings points better than another would be expected to defeat their opponent by 1 point at a neutral location.
Scoring Tilt
Average home points - average away points per game. The gold line represents the expected home points edge according to the scoring value of a point of Elo and the number of Elo rating points home advantage is worth.
Road-Tilted: under -3.2 · Lean Road: -3.2 to 0 · Lean Home: 0 to 3.2 · Home-Tilted: 3.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeTieAway
+30.36%
Fortress
62.50%5.36%32.14%
Elo Value
Home Edge: 108.90 Elo pts.
23 Elo
0.043 points per Elo point
060
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+5.36 points
Home-Tilted
-8+4.72+8

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of preseason title contenders. Calculated by taking 1 divided by the sum of squared preseason title odds. Higher numbers indicate more parity in the league while 1 indicates that the preseason favorite is a near-lock.
Front-Runner: under 2 · Few Contenders: 2 to 4 · Open Race: 4 to 8 · Wide Open: 8 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would win the title based on the simulated results. Location of the dot marks their rank across all teams, ranging from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st · Among the Favorites: 2nd · Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 4th · Longshot: 5th or lower.
Title-Race Openness
4.9
Open Race
1248
Champion Preseason Odds
31%
San Diego Chargers, 1st of 8
LongshotFavorite

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Average standard deviation of the difference between each team's actual wins total and their simulated average wins total. The gold line is the standard deviation the model expected from random chance alone.
Subdued: under 1.37 · As Expected: 1.37 to 1.89 · Elevated: 1.89 to 2.58 · High Variance: 2.58 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap in the rank of the final standings between where each team finished in the standings and where the model projected them to finish.
Pinpoint: under 1.48 · Close: 1.48 to 2.01 · Off Target: 2.01 to 2.62 · Well Off Target: 2.62 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team whose record finished in the highest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the top team in a league of 8 teams typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team whose record finished in the lowest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the bottom team in a league of 8 teams typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished either above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile. Even with a well-calibrated model, 10% of teams are expected to land in the extremes of their distributions.
Minimal Outliers: under 0.4 · As Expected: 0.4 to 0.96 · Several Outliers: 0.96 to 1.76 · Many Outliers: 1.76 and up.
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Number of teams that actually made the playoffs but were not in the model's projected field.The gold line represents how many playoff teams the simulation missed on average.
Fewer Than Expected: under 0.8 · As Expected: 0.8 to 1.33 · More Than Expected: 1.33 to 2.14 · Far More Than Expected: 2.14 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
1.60 wins
As Expected
01.724
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.50
Close
01.754
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 93.75%
98.62%
San Diego Chargers
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
24.97%
Denver Broncos
06.25%50
Season Outliers
Expected
2 of 8
Many Outliers
00.88
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Expected
1 of 2
As Expected
01.12

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
Measures how evenly wins were distributed across the league. Lower scores indicate there was less variability across the actual wins totals .Higher scores are an indication of more imbalance in the league with a few unusually strong or unusually weak teams.
Highly Balanced: under 0.08 · Balanced: 0.08 to 0.15 · Top-Heavy: 0.15 to 0.24 · Concentrated: 0.24 and up.
Noll-Scully
Measures how more times spread out the final standings were in reality compared to standings that were generated by flipping a coin for each game. The gold line at 1 indicates as much variability in the standings as s coin flip. Above it, talent gaps in team composition stretched the standings more than the variability produced by luck alone. Below it, the league was more competitive than coin flips alone would yield.
Compressed: under 0.9 · Coin-Flip Spread: 0.9 to 1.15 · Moderate Separation: 1.15 to 1.45 · Stratified: 1.45 and up.
Interquartile Edge
The probability that the team in the 75th percentile of the league's Elo ratings would defeat the team in the 25th percentile at a neutral site. The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league.
Even: under 58% · Competitive: 58% to 65% · Tilted: 65% to 73% · Lopsided: 73% and up.
Best vs. Worst
The probability that the team with the highest Elo rating would defeat the team with the lowest Elo rating at a neutral site.The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league. The gold line represents how high this probability is expected to be in a league of this size. A blue dot to the right indicates an unusually dominant team or an unusually weak team.
Tight: under 65% · Clear Edge: 65% to 78% · Lopsided: 78% to 88% · No Contest: 88% and up.
Close Games
Actual percentage of games decided by 3 run/points or fewer. The gold line indicates the proportion of close games you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Mostly Decisive: under 25% · Some Drama: 25% to 38% · Often Close: 38% to 50% · Nail-Biters: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Actual percentage of games decided by 17 runs/points or more. The gold line indicates the proportion of blowouts you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Rare: under 10% · Occasional: 10% to 20% · Frequent: 20% to 30% · Routine: 30% and up.
Gini Index
0.18
Top-Heavy
00.080.150.240.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
0.60
Compressed
01.003
Interquartile Edge
72%
Tilted
50%58%65%73%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 93%
92%
No Contest
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
16%
Mostly Decisive
0%14%100%
Blowouts
Expected
32%
Routine
0%39%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame win probabilities aligned with the actual game result, averaged over the entire season. Picks that were both confident and correct are rewarded the most, while incorrect predictions and/or uncertain predictions are penalized more. Lower scores are better. 0 indicates every game was perfectly predicted with maximum confidence. For sports with where wins and losses are the only outcomes, Brier scores less than 0.25 indicate the model did better than random predictions. For sports where ties are possible, 0.67 is the cutoff for which the Brier score must be lower to beat random predictions. The lower the Brier score, the easier and more accurately the games were to predict.
Highly Predictable: under 0.18 · Predictable: 0.18 to 0.22 · Hard to Predict: 0.22 to 0.25 · Coin-Flip: 0.25 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, calculated by averaging the difference in the win probabilities divided by the sum of the win probabilities. Lower scores indicate more parity in the league. 0 indicates that every game was a 50-50 toss-up between evenly matched teams. 1 means every game pitted a heavy favorite against a huge underdog.
Evenly Matched: under 0.12 · Slight Separation: 0.12 to 0.22 · Wide Gaps: 0.22 to 0.34 · Lopsided: 0.34 and up.
Strangeness
How extreme the actual final standings were compared to what the model expected. A value of 0 would indicate that the simulated results perfectly matched the actual standings. A score of 1 indicates that the actual results were scattered around the projections by exactly the variance the model predicted. (i.e. The projections missed the actual standings by 1 standard deviation on average. Scores larger than 1 mean the season was wilder to forecast with more overperforming and underperforming teams than expected. Scores less than 1 indicate the season was more predictable.
Tighter Than Modeled: under 0.85 · As Expected: 0.85 to 1.15 · Volatile: 1.15 to 1.5 · Chaotic: 1.5 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the order of the final standings aligned with the ranked preseason Elo ratings as calculated by the Spearman rank correlation. Larger values indicate that the preseason Elo ratings were a strong predictor of the team's final rank in the standings while values near 0 mean.
Reshuffled: under 0.3 · Weak Alignment: 0.3 to 0.6 · Strong Alignment: 0.6 to 0.85 · Closely Aligned: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality. The gold line measures how often the model expected the underdog to win when considering the outcome probabilities. A blue dot to the right of the gold line means upsets were more prevalent than left. A dot to the left indicates that favorites won more often than expected.
Chalk Held: under 30% · As Expected: 30% to 40% · Upset-Prone: 40% to 46% · Bedlam: 46% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality, but only including games with a clear favorite, one at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside. This metrics ignores games that could be considered toss-ups. The gold line is how often the model expected these heavy favorites to lose. A dot to the right means the big favorites were upset more than expected; to the left means they took care of business.
Favorites Held: under 22% · As Expected: 22% to 32% · Shaky Favorites: 32% to 42% · Bedlam: 42% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.20
Predictable
00.211
Matchup Imbalance
0.34
Wide Gaps
00.120.220.340.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.03
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
-0.29
Reshuffled
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
32%
As Expected
0%31%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
24%
As Expected
0%24%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Games are sorted into bins according to how confident the model was. Within each bin, the predicted number of wins, losses, and ties are compared against the actual counts. The p-value of this test is plotted below. Values above 0.05 indicate that the model's probabilities are well-calibrated for the season.
Clear Misfit: under 0.01 · Misfit: 0.01 to 0.05 · Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 · Well Calibrated: 0.1 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the model's probabilities is correct. Each probability is turned into their log-odds. A line is fit that predicts the actual results from the log-odds. The slope of this line is the calibration slope.A slope of 1.00 is perfect, indicating that the model's confidence matches the actual outcomes of the games. Slopes less than 1.00 indicate overconfidence. The model assigned higher probabilities to the favorites than was appropriate given the matchup, causing more losses by favored teams. Slopes greater than 1.00 indicate under-confidence. The model is more uncertain about too many results, assigning them lower probabilities when in reality the favorites should have had higher probabilities.
Overconfident: under 0.85 · Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 · Underconfident: 1.15 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
Calibration error (ECE) checks whether the model's probabilities mean what they say. ECE is calculated as the average weighted gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted outcome actually occurred. The smaller the ECE, the more confident we are about the model's probabilities. The gold line represents the noise ceiling, which is the amount of error that luck can produce on its own even if the probabilities are perfectly calibrated. Values below the noise ceiling indicate that the model's error is no larger than chance alone would produce. Values above the noice ceiling point to a genuine calibration issue since the error is larger than luck could explain.
Well Within Noise: under 0.09 · Within Noise: 0.09 to 0.18 · Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.36 · Well Above Noise: 0.36 and up.
Probability calibration
0.94
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.11
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.78
Overconfident
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.033
Well Within Noise
00.1820.4

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual wins, simulated final wins, playoff probability, and division-title probability - day by day. Select a division to see all five charts for its teams.

Elo Through the Playoffs

How each playoff team's Elo rating evolved as the postseason unfolded. Elo Progression traces each team's game-by-game Elo rating through their playoff run. Net Elo Change summarizes the difference in Elo rating between the beginning and end of the playoffs for each team.

Stochastic Playoff Outcomes

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Made Playoffs Won Championship Game
San Diego Chargers 42.69% 31.01%
Boston Patriots 50.55% 21.18%
Oakland Raiders 25.50% 16.95%
Kansas City Chiefs 29.49% 15.02%
Buffalo Bills 19.39% 8.01%
Houston Oilers 21.37% 5.85%
New York Jets 8.70% 1.50%
Denver Broncos 2.31% 0.48%
Loser →
↓ Winner
Denver BroncosKansas City ChiefsOakland RaidersSan Diego ChargersBoston PatriotsBuffalo BillsHouston OilersNew York Jets
Boston Patriots83.8%1.15%55.3%14.98%39.1%12.93%32.0%21.49%
Buffalo Bills84.1%0.48%54.8%5.69%37.3%4.89%32.1%8.33%
Houston Oilers73.2%0.48%38.8%6.24%25.2%5.50%18.5%9.15%
New York Jets56.7%0.21%25.5%2.59%13.4%2.17%11.6%3.72%
Denver Broncos16.2%1.15%15.9%0.48%26.8%0.48%43.3%0.21%
Kansas City Chiefs44.7%14.98%45.2%5.69%61.2%6.24%74.5%2.59%
Oakland Raiders60.9%12.93%62.7%4.89%74.8%5.50%86.6%2.17%
San Diego Chargers68.0%21.49%67.9%8.33%81.5%9.15%88.4%3.72%

Actual Bracket Simulation

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Won Championship Game Actual Outcome
San Diego Chargers 68.52% Won Championship Game
Loser →
↓ Winner
San Diego ChargersBuffalo Bills
Buffalo Bills31.5%100.00%
San Diego Chargers68.5%100.00%

Most-Likely Championship Paths

For each playoff team, what was the most likely path they had to the championship across all simulations? Tiles represent the opponent they faced and defeated the most often in each round.

San Diego Chargers 68.52% chance to win
Championship Game
vs. Buffalo Bills
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
68.52%
Buffalo Bills 31.48% chance to win
Championship Game
vs. San Diego Chargers
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
31.48%

Regular Season Games

Summary of every regular-season game played this season.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1963-09-08 New York Jets W 38-14 1518.58 1452.81 70.65% 25.13% +28.43 1-0
1963-09-14 @ San Diego Chargers L 13-17 1547.01 1477.37 41.82% 53.01% -19.23 1-1
1963-09-22 @ Oakland Raiders W 20-14 1527.78 1529.19 32.47% 62.74% +34.68 2-1
1963-09-29 @ Denver Broncos L 10-14 1562.46 1389.15 56.55% 38.39% -25.63 2-2
1963-10-05 @ New York Jets L 24-31 1536.83 1466.20 41.96% 52.87% -25.51 2-3
1963-10-11 Oakland Raiders W 20-14 1511.32 1448.20 70.35% 25.41% +14.37 3-3
1963-10-18 Denver Broncos W 40-21 1525.69 1421.68 74.83% 21.36% +21.43 4-3
1963-10-26 @ Buffalo Bills L 21-28 1547.12 1490.22 40.07% 54.81% -24.40 4-4
1963-11-01 Houston Oilers W 45-3 1522.72 1593.10 52.91% 41.93% +62.44 5-4
1963-11-10 San Diego Chargers L 6-7 1585.16 1634.87 55.82% 39.09% -12.66 5-5
1963-11-17 Kansas City Chiefs T 24-24 1572.50 1412.91 80.14% 16.64% -3.51 5-5
1963-12-01 Buffalo Bills W 17-7 1568.99 1508.16 70.08% 25.65% +18.73 6-5
1963-12-08 @ Houston Oilers W 46-28 1587.72 1516.77 42.01% 52.82% +50.95 7-5
1963-12-14 @ Kansas City Chiefs L 3-35 1638.67 1413.70 63.49% 31.77% -81.00 7-6
1963-09-08 @ San Diego Chargers L 10-14 1529.55 1458.03 42.09% 52.74% -19.34 0-1
1963-09-15 @ Oakland Raiders L 17-35 1510.21 1495.39 34.50% 60.60% -33.80 0-2
1963-09-22 Kansas City Chiefs T 27-27 1476.41 1648.78 38.51% 56.41% +0.98 0-2
1963-09-28 Houston Oilers L 20-31 1477.39 1481.17 62.06% 33.11% -46.47 0-3
1963-10-05 Oakland Raiders W 12-0 1430.92 1479.24 56.01% 38.90% +31.04 1-3
1963-10-13 @ Kansas City Chiefs W 35-26 1461.96 1627.96 16.16% 80.70% +53.91 2-3
1963-10-20 @ Houston Oilers L 14-28 1515.87 1540.74 29.66% 65.75% -25.65 2-4
1963-10-26 Boston Patriots W 28-21 1490.22 1547.12 54.81% 40.07% +24.40 3-4
1963-11-03 @ Denver Broncos W 30-28 1514.62 1402.37 47.87% 46.91% +15.16 4-4
1963-11-09 Denver Broncos W 27-17 1529.78 1387.20 78.61% 17.99% +13.04 5-4
1963-11-17 San Diego Chargers L 13-23 1542.82 1647.53 47.99% 46.79% -34.66 5-5
1963-12-01 @ Boston Patriots L 7-17 1508.16 1568.99 25.65% 70.08% -18.73 5-6
1963-12-08 New York Jets W 45-14 1489.43 1423.99 70.62% 25.17% +32.35 6-6
1963-12-14 @ New York Jets W 19-10 1521.78 1391.64 50.44% 44.35% +30.51 7-6
1963-09-07 Kansas City Chiefs L 7-59 1487.22 1563.33 52.09% 42.73% -85.45 0-1
1963-09-14 @ Houston Oilers L 14-20 1401.77 1495.09 22.37% 73.70% -12.62 0-2
1963-09-29 Boston Patriots W 14-10 1389.15 1562.46 38.39% 56.55% +25.63 1-2
1963-10-06 San Diego Chargers W 50-34 1414.78 1542.02 44.76% 50.02% +45.61 2-2
1963-10-13 Houston Oilers L 24-33 1460.39 1502.04 56.94% 38.01% -38.71 2-3
1963-10-18 @ Boston Patriots L 21-40 1421.68 1525.69 21.36% 74.83% -21.42 2-4
1963-10-26 @ New York Jets T 35-35 1400.26 1434.68 28.56% 66.93% +2.11 2-4
1963-11-03 Buffalo Bills L 28-30 1402.37 1514.62 46.91% 47.87% -15.17 2-5
1963-11-09 @ Buffalo Bills L 17-27 1387.20 1529.78 17.99% 78.61% -13.04 2-6
1963-11-17 New York Jets L 9-14 1374.16 1357.07 64.76% 30.57% -32.63 2-7
1963-11-28 Oakland Raiders L 10-26 1341.53 1554.96 33.19% 61.98% -30.66 2-8
1963-12-08 @ Kansas City Chiefs L 21-52 1310.87 1382.14 24.56% 71.28% -31.56 2-9
1963-12-15 @ Oakland Raiders L 31-35 1279.31 1627.19 6.54% 91.96% -2.92 2-10
1963-12-22 @ San Diego Chargers L 20-58 1276.39 1681.90 4.81% 94.04% -6.57 2-11
1963-09-07 Oakland Raiders L 13-24 1551.19 1439.29 75.64% 20.63% -56.10 0-1
1963-09-14 Denver Broncos W 20-14 1495.09 1401.77 73.70% 22.37% +12.62 1-1
1963-09-22 @ New York Jets L 17-24 1507.71 1424.38 43.74% 51.06% -26.54 1-2
1963-09-28 @ Buffalo Bills W 31-20 1481.17 1477.39 33.11% 62.06% +46.46 2-2
1963-10-06 @ Kansas City Chiefs L 7-28 1527.63 1602.37 24.21% 71.67% -25.59 2-3
1963-10-13 @ Denver Broncos W 33-24 1502.04 1460.39 38.01% 56.94% +38.70 3-3
1963-10-20 Buffalo Bills W 28-14 1540.74 1515.87 65.75% 29.66% +25.65 4-3
1963-10-27 Kansas City Chiefs W 28-7 1566.39 1501.72 70.53% 25.25% +26.71 5-3
1963-11-01 @ Boston Patriots L 3-45 1593.10 1522.72 41.93% 52.91% -62.44 5-4
1963-11-10 New York Jets W 31-27 1530.66 1364.45 80.72% 16.14% +7.38 6-4
1963-12-01 @ San Diego Chargers L 0-27 1538.04 1682.19 17.86% 78.76% -21.27 6-5
1963-12-08 Boston Patriots L 28-46 1516.77 1587.72 52.82% 42.01% -50.95 6-6
1963-12-15 San Diego Chargers L 14-20 1465.82 1661.89 35.39% 59.67% -20.01 6-7
1963-12-22 @ Oakland Raiders L 49-52 1445.81 1630.10 14.83% 82.22% -5.85 6-8
1963-09-07 @ Denver Broncos W 59-7 1563.33 1487.22 42.73% 52.09% +85.45 1-0
1963-09-22 @ Buffalo Bills T 27-27 1648.78 1476.41 56.41% 38.51% -0.98 1-0
1963-09-29 @ San Diego Chargers L 10-24 1647.80 1496.59 53.44% 41.40% -45.43 1-1
1963-10-06 Houston Oilers W 28-7 1602.37 1527.63 71.67% 24.21% +25.59 2-1
1963-10-13 Buffalo Bills L 26-35 1627.96 1461.96 80.70% 16.16% -53.90 2-2
1963-10-20 San Diego Chargers L 17-38 1574.06 1511.24 70.31% 25.44% -72.34 2-3
1963-10-27 @ Houston Oilers L 7-28 1501.72 1566.39 25.25% 70.53% -26.71 2-4
1963-11-03 @ Oakland Raiders L 7-10 1475.01 1492.86 30.48% 64.86% -12.21 2-5
1963-11-08 Oakland Raiders L 7-22 1462.80 1505.07 56.85% 38.09% -49.89 2-6
1963-11-17 @ Boston Patriots T 24-24 1412.91 1572.50 16.64% 80.14% +3.51 2-6
1963-12-01 @ New York Jets L 0-17 1416.42 1389.71 36.04% 58.99% -34.28 2-7
1963-12-08 Denver Broncos W 52-21 1382.14 1310.87 71.28% 24.56% +31.56 3-7
1963-12-14 Boston Patriots W 35-3 1413.70 1638.67 31.77% 63.49% +81.00 4-7
1963-12-22 New York Jets W 48-0 1494.70 1361.13 77.77% 18.74% +29.79 5-7
1963-09-08 @ Boston Patriots L 14-38 1452.81 1518.58 25.13% 70.65% -28.43 0-1
1963-09-22 Houston Oilers W 24-17 1424.38 1507.71 51.06% 43.74% +26.55 1-1
1963-09-28 Oakland Raiders W 10-7 1450.93 1494.51 56.67% 38.26% +15.27 2-1
1963-10-05 Boston Patriots W 31-24 1466.20 1536.83 52.87% 41.96% +25.51 3-1
1963-10-13 @ San Diego Chargers L 20-24 1491.71 1496.42 32.07% 63.17% -14.82 3-2
1963-10-20 @ Oakland Raiders L 26-49 1476.89 1433.83 38.20% 56.74% -42.21 3-3
1963-10-26 Denver Broncos T 35-35 1434.68 1400.26 66.93% 28.56% -2.11 3-3
1963-11-02 San Diego Chargers L 7-53 1432.57 1566.76 43.78% 51.02% -68.12 3-4
1963-11-10 @ Houston Oilers L 27-31 1364.45 1530.66 16.14% 80.72% -7.38 3-5
1963-11-17 @ Denver Broncos W 14-9 1357.07 1374.16 30.57% 64.76% +32.64 4-5
1963-12-01 Kansas City Chiefs W 17-0 1389.71 1416.42 58.99% 36.04% +34.28 5-5
1963-12-08 @ Buffalo Bills L 14-45 1423.99 1489.43 25.17% 70.62% -32.35 5-6
1963-12-14 Buffalo Bills L 10-19 1391.64 1521.78 44.35% 50.44% -30.51 5-7
1963-12-22 @ Kansas City Chiefs L 0-48 1361.13 1494.70 18.74% 77.77% -29.78 5-8
1963-09-07 @ Houston Oilers W 24-13 1439.29 1551.19 20.63% 75.64% +56.10 1-0
1963-09-15 Buffalo Bills W 35-17 1495.39 1510.21 60.60% 34.50% +33.80 2-0
1963-09-22 Boston Patriots L 14-20 1529.19 1527.78 62.74% 32.47% -34.68 2-1
1963-09-28 @ New York Jets L 7-10 1494.51 1450.93 38.26% 56.67% -15.27 2-2
1963-10-05 @ Buffalo Bills L 0-12 1479.24 1430.92 38.90% 56.01% -31.04 2-3
1963-10-11 @ Boston Patriots L 14-20 1448.20 1511.32 25.41% 70.35% -14.37 2-4
1963-10-20 New York Jets W 49-26 1433.83 1476.89 56.74% 38.20% +42.21 3-4
1963-10-27 @ San Diego Chargers W 34-33 1476.04 1583.58 21.03% 75.19% +16.82 4-4
1963-11-03 Kansas City Chiefs W 10-7 1492.86 1475.01 64.86% 30.48% +12.21 5-4
1963-11-08 @ Kansas City Chiefs W 22-7 1505.07 1462.80 38.09% 56.85% +49.89 6-4
1963-11-28 @ Denver Broncos W 26-10 1554.96 1341.53 61.98% 33.19% +30.66 7-4
1963-12-08 San Diego Chargers W 41-27 1585.62 1703.46 46.11% 48.67% +41.57 8-4
1963-12-15 Denver Broncos W 35-31 1627.19 1279.31 91.96% 6.54% +2.91 9-4
1963-12-22 Houston Oilers W 52-49 1630.10 1445.81 82.22% 14.83% +5.86 10-4
1963-09-08 Buffalo Bills W 14-10 1458.03 1529.55 52.74% 42.09% +19.34 1-0
1963-09-14 Boston Patriots W 17-13 1477.37 1547.01 53.01% 41.82% +19.22 2-0
1963-09-29 Kansas City Chiefs W 24-10 1496.59 1647.80 41.40% 53.44% +45.43 3-0
1963-10-06 @ Denver Broncos L 34-50 1542.02 1414.78 50.02% 44.76% -45.60 3-1
1963-10-13 New York Jets W 24-20 1496.42 1491.71 63.17% 32.07% +14.82 4-1
1963-10-20 @ Kansas City Chiefs W 38-17 1511.24 1574.06 25.44% 70.31% +72.34 5-1
1963-10-27 Oakland Raiders L 33-34 1583.58 1476.04 75.19% 21.03% -16.82 5-2
1963-11-02 @ New York Jets W 53-7 1566.76 1432.57 51.02% 43.78% +68.11 6-2
1963-11-10 @ Boston Patriots W 7-6 1634.87 1585.16 39.09% 55.82% +12.66 7-2
1963-11-17 @ Buffalo Bills W 23-13 1647.53 1542.82 46.79% 47.99% +34.66 8-2
1963-12-01 Houston Oilers W 27-0 1682.19 1538.04 78.76% 17.86% +21.27 9-2
1963-12-08 @ Oakland Raiders L 27-41 1703.46 1585.62 48.67% 46.11% -41.57 9-3
1963-12-15 @ Houston Oilers W 20-14 1661.89 1465.82 59.67% 35.39% +20.01 10-3
1963-12-22 Denver Broncos W 58-20 1681.90 1276.39 94.04% 4.81% +6.57 11-3

Playoff Games

Every playoff game from the selected team's perspective.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1963-12-28 @ Buffalo Bills W 26-8 1557.67 1552.29 35.53% 64.47% +59.24 1-0
1964-01-05 @ San Diego Chargers L 10-51 1616.91 1688.47 26.14% 73.86% -36.25 1-1
1963-12-28 Boston Patriots L 8-26 1552.29 1557.67 64.47% 35.53% -59.25 0-1
1964-01-05 Boston Patriots W 51-10 1688.47 1616.91 73.86% 26.14% +36.25 1-0

Biggest Upsets

The 25 biggest upsets of the seasons, ranked by lowest pregame win probability. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1963-10-13 16.16% Buffalo Bills 1461.96 35 @ Kansas City Chiefs 1627.96 26
2 1963-09-07 20.63% Oakland Raiders 1439.29 24 @ Houston Oilers 1551.19 13
3 1963-10-27 21.03% Oakland Raiders 1476.04 34 @ San Diego Chargers 1583.58 33
4 1963-10-20 25.44% San Diego Chargers 1511.24 38 @ Kansas City Chiefs 1574.06 17
5 1963-11-17 30.57% New York Jets 1357.07 14 @ Denver Broncos 1374.16 9
6 1963-12-14 31.77% @ Kansas City Chiefs 1413.70 35 Boston Patriots 1638.67 3
7 1963-09-22 32.47% Boston Patriots 1527.78 20 @ Oakland Raiders 1529.19 14
8 1963-09-28 33.11% Houston Oilers 1481.17 31 @ Buffalo Bills 1477.39 20
9 1963-12-28 * 35.53% Boston Patriots 1557.67 26 @ Buffalo Bills 1552.29 8
10 1963-10-13 38.01% Houston Oilers 1502.04 33 @ Denver Broncos 1460.39 24
11 1963-11-08 38.09% Oakland Raiders 1505.07 22 @ Kansas City Chiefs 1462.80 7
12 1963-09-29 38.39% @ Denver Broncos 1389.15 14 Boston Patriots 1562.46 10
13 1963-11-10 39.09% San Diego Chargers 1634.87 7 @ Boston Patriots 1585.16 6
14 1963-09-29 41.40% @ San Diego Chargers 1496.59 24 Kansas City Chiefs 1647.80 10
15 1963-12-08 42.01% Boston Patriots 1587.72 46 @ Houston Oilers 1516.77 28
16 1963-09-07 42.73% Kansas City Chiefs 1563.33 59 @ Denver Broncos 1487.22 7
17 1963-10-06 44.76% @ Denver Broncos 1414.78 50 San Diego Chargers 1542.02 34
18 1963-12-08 46.11% @ Oakland Raiders 1585.62 41 San Diego Chargers 1703.46 27
19 1963-11-17 46.79% San Diego Chargers 1647.53 23 @ Buffalo Bills 1542.82 13

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1963-09-07 85.45 Kansas City Chiefs 59 1563.33 42.73% @ Denver Broncos 7 1487.22 52.09%
2 1963-12-14 81.00 @ Kansas City Chiefs 35 1413.70 31.77% Boston Patriots 3 1638.67 63.49%
3 1963-10-20 72.34 San Diego Chargers 38 1511.24 25.44% @ Kansas City Chiefs 17 1574.06 70.31%
4 1963-11-02 68.12 San Diego Chargers 53 1566.76 51.02% @ New York Jets 7 1432.57 43.78%
5 1963-11-01 62.44 @ Boston Patriots 45 1522.72 52.91% Houston Oilers 3 1593.10 41.93%
6 1963-12-28 * 59.25 Boston Patriots 26 1557.67 35.53% @ Buffalo Bills 8 1552.29 64.47%
7 1963-09-07 56.10 Oakland Raiders 24 1439.29 20.63% @ Houston Oilers 13 1551.19 75.64%
8 1963-10-13 53.91 Buffalo Bills 35 1461.96 16.16% @ Kansas City Chiefs 26 1627.96 80.70%
9 1963-12-08 50.95 Boston Patriots 46 1587.72 42.01% @ Houston Oilers 28 1516.77 52.82%
10 1963-11-08 49.89 Oakland Raiders 22 1505.07 38.09% @ Kansas City Chiefs 7 1462.80 56.85%
11 1963-09-28 46.47 Houston Oilers 31 1481.17 33.11% @ Buffalo Bills 20 1477.39 62.06%
12 1963-10-06 45.61 @ Denver Broncos 50 1414.78 44.76% San Diego Chargers 34 1542.02 50.02%
13 1963-09-29 45.43 @ San Diego Chargers 24 1496.59 41.40% Kansas City Chiefs 10 1647.80 53.44%
14 1963-10-20 42.21 @ Oakland Raiders 49 1433.83 56.74% New York Jets 26 1476.89 38.20%
15 1963-12-08 41.57 @ Oakland Raiders 41 1585.62 46.11% San Diego Chargers 27 1703.46 48.67%
16 1963-10-13 38.71 Houston Oilers 33 1502.04 38.01% @ Denver Broncos 24 1460.39 56.94%
17 1964-01-05 * 36.25 @ San Diego Chargers 51 1688.47 73.86% Boston Patriots 10 1616.91 26.14%
18 1963-09-22 34.68 Boston Patriots 20 1527.78 32.47% @ Oakland Raiders 14 1529.19 62.74%
19 1963-11-17 34.66 San Diego Chargers 23 1647.53 46.79% @ Buffalo Bills 13 1542.82 47.99%
20 1963-12-01 34.28 @ New York Jets 17 1389.71 58.99% Kansas City Chiefs 0 1416.42 36.04%
21 1963-09-15 33.80 @ Oakland Raiders 35 1495.39 60.60% Buffalo Bills 17 1510.21 34.50%
22 1963-11-17 32.64 New York Jets 14 1357.07 30.57% @ Denver Broncos 9 1374.16 64.76%
23 1963-12-08 32.35 @ Buffalo Bills 45 1489.43 70.62% New York Jets 14 1423.99 25.17%
24 1963-12-08 31.56 @ Kansas City Chiefs 52 1382.14 71.28% Denver Broncos 21 1310.87 24.56%
25 1963-10-05 31.04 @ Buffalo Bills 12 1430.92 56.01% Oakland Raiders 0 1479.24 38.90%