1962 AFL Season

56 regular-season games · 2 playoff teams

Final

Champion

Dallas Texans

1st Title

Runner-Up

Houston Oilers

3rd Appearance

Last Appearance: 1961

Biggest Overachiever

Dallas Texans

1.51 wins above expected

11 wins · 9.49 expected wins

Biggest Disappointment

San Diego Chargers

2.13 wins below expected

4 wins · 6.13 expected wins

Final Standings

Final regular season records. The vsSim column shows actual wins minus the simulation's mean wins - positive values indicate the team overachieved, negative values mean they underperformed.

#	Team	W	L	T	Pct	GB	PF	PA	PD	SimW	vsSim
1	Houston Oilers Division	11	3	0	.786	-	387	270	+117	10.46	+0.54
2	Boston Patriots	9	4	1	.679	1.5	346	295	+51	9.79	-0.29
3	Buffalo Bills	7	6	1	.536	3.5	309	272	+37	6.14	+1.36
4	New York Titans	5	9	0	.357	6	278	423	-145	5.17	-0.17

#	Team	W	L	Pct	GB	PF	PA	PD	SimW	vsSim
1	Dallas Texans Division	11	3	.786	-	389	233	+156	9.49	+1.51
2	Denver Broncos	7	7	.500	4	353	334	+19	6.33	+0.67
3	San Diego Chargers	4	10	.286	7	314	392	-78	6.13	-2.13
4	Oakland Raiders	1	13	.071	10	213	370	-157	2.48	-1.48

Playoff Bracket

AFL Championship Game

Dallas Texans 20

Houston Oilers 17

Dec 23

Season Summary

Every team's regular season finish compared against the simulated win totals. Click on any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual total minus the simulation's mean. Positive values indicate the team outperformed the expected total; negative values indicate the team was unluckier than expected. Percentile represents where their actual result fell in the simulated distribution.

Team	Conference	Elo	Actual	Avg. Wins	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Houston Oilers	East	1729	11	10.46	+0.54	77.11%	3	8	9	10	11	13	14
Dallas Texans	West	1697	11	9.49	+1.51	91.39%	2	7	8	9	10	12	14
Buffalo Bills	East	1599	7.5	6.14	+1.36	93.39%	0	3	5	6	7	9	12
Boston Patriots	East	1575	9.5	9.79	-0.29	68.57%	2	7	9	10	11	12	14
Denver Broncos	West	1449	7	6.33	+0.67	78.43%	0	4	5	6	7	9	14
New York Titans	East	1360	5	5.17	-0.17	61.65%	0	2	4	5	6	8	12
San Diego Chargers	West	1333	4	6.13	-2.13	18.07%	0	3	5	6	7	9	12
Oakland Raiders	West	1258	1	2.48	-1.48	27.26%	0	0	1	2	3	5	9

Head-to-Head

Cells show each team's record against each opponent with the expected wins from the simulation below Gold-tinted cells indicate the team beat the model's expectations by more than a half-win while navy-tinted cells indicate they fell short by more than a half-win. The first table covers within-division games while the second covers games against teams outside the division.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Within East

Team	Patriots	Bills	Oilers	Titans
Boston Patriots	—	1-0-1 (1.3 exp.)	1-1 (0.8 exp.)	2-0 (1.6 exp.)
Buffalo Bills	0-1-1 (0.7 exp.)	—	0-2 (0.3 exp.)	1-1 (1.2 exp.)
Houston Oilers	1-1 (1.2 exp.)	2-0 (1.7 exp.)	—	2-0 (1.7 exp.)
New York Titans	0-2 (0.4 exp.)	1-1 (0.8 exp.)	0-2 (0.3 exp.)	—

East vs. Outside Teams

Team	Texans	Broncos	Raiders	Chargers
Boston Patriots	0-2 (1.3 exp.)	2-0 (1.3 exp.)	1-1 (1.9 exp.)	2-0 (1.6 exp.)
Buffalo Bills	1-1 (0.5 exp.)	1-1 (0.9 exp.)	2-0 (1.6 exp.)	2-0 (0.9 exp.)
Houston Oilers	1-1 (0.9 exp.)	1-1 (1.5 exp.)	2-0 (1.9 exp.)	2-0 (1.5 exp.)
New York Titans	0-2 (0.4 exp.)	1-1 (1.0 exp.)	2-0 (1.4 exp.)	1-1 (0.9 exp.)

Within West

Team	Texans	Broncos	Raiders	Chargers
Dallas Texans	—	2-0 (1.5 exp.)	2-0 (1.7 exp.)	1-1 (1.4 exp.)
Denver Broncos	0-2 (0.5 exp.)	—	2-0 (1.5 exp.)	2-0 (0.9 exp.)
Oakland Raiders	0-2 (0.3 exp.)	0-2 (0.4 exp.)	—	0-2 (0.5 exp.)
San Diego Chargers	1-1 (0.5 exp.)	0-2 (1.0 exp.)	2-0 (1.4 exp.)	—

West vs. Outside Teams

Team	Patriots	Bills	Oilers	Titans
Dallas Texans	2-0 (0.6 exp.)	1-1 (1.5 exp.)	1-1 (1.1 exp.)	2-0 (1.6 exp.)
Denver Broncos	0-2 (0.6 exp.)	1-1 (1.1 exp.)	1-1 (0.5 exp.)	1-1 (1.0 exp.)
Oakland Raiders	1-1 (0.1 exp.)	0-2 (0.3 exp.)	0-2 (0.1 exp.)	0-2 (0.6 exp.)
San Diego Chargers	0-2 (0.4 exp.)	0-2 (1.1 exp.)	0-2 (0.5 exp.)	1-1 (1.1 exp.)

Scoreline Distribution

Cells represent the percentage of games that ended with a team's points in the row and its opponent's points in the column. Cells below the diagonal are wins (gold), and cells above are losses (blue). Totals along the edges show the marginal percentages for that row or column.

Win Loss Same range

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	0.89%	4.46%	2.68%	—	—	—	8.04%
7–13	0.89%	—	1.79%	1.79%	1.79%	1.79%	1.79%	9.82%
14–20	4.46%	1.79%	5.36%	8.04%	3.57%	2.68%	2.68%	28.57%
21–27	2.68%	1.79%	8.04%	—	5.36%	0.89%	—	18.75%
28–34	—	1.79%	3.57%	5.36%	5.36%	—	2.68%	18.75%
35–41	—	1.79%	2.68%	0.89%	—	—	0.89%	6.25%
42+	—	1.79%	2.68%	—	2.68%	0.89%	1.79%	9.82%
Total	8.04%	9.82%	28.57%	18.75%	18.75%	6.25%	9.82%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	23.12	23.12	+0.00
SD	11.83	11.83	16.64
CV	0.51	0.51	—
Max	56	56	+39
Min	0	0	-39

Games Played: 56

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
7–13	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
14–20	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
21–27	—	7.14%	21.43%	—	—	—	—	28.57%
28–34	—	—	—	7.14%	14.29%	—	7.14%	28.57%
35–41	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
42+	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	—	7.14%	50.00%	21.43%	14.29%	—	7.14%	100%

Boston Patriots — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	24.71	21.07	+3.64
SD	11.76	8.21	14.67
CV	0.48	0.39	—
Max	43	42	+29
Min	0	10	-20

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
7–13	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
14–20	14.29%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	28.57%
21–27	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	21.43%
28–34	—	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%
35–41	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
42+	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%
Total	21.43%	7.14%	28.57%	14.29%	14.29%	14.29%	—	100%

Buffalo Bills — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	22.07	19.43	+2.64
SD	11.57	11.55	12.74
CV	0.52	0.59	—
Max	45	41	+25
Min	6	3	-20

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
7–13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
14–20	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	21.43%
21–27	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%	—	—	—	—	28.57%
28–34	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
35–41	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
42+	—	—	—	—	14.29%	—	—	14.29%
Total	7.14%	28.57%	28.57%	14.29%	21.43%	—	—	100%

Dallas Texans — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	27.79	16.64	+11.14
SD	12.05	9.39	12.09
CV	0.43	0.56	—
Max	52	32	+28
Min	6	3	-9

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
7–13	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
14–20	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	21.43%
21–27	7.14%	—	14.29%	—	—	—	—	21.43%
28–34	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	21.43%
35–41	—	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%
42+	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%	14.29%
Total	7.14%	21.43%	21.43%	14.29%	14.29%	7.14%	14.29%	100%

Denver Broncos — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	25.21	23.86	+1.36
SD	12.12	13.84	17.06
CV	0.48	0.58	—
Max	45	46	+37
Min	3	6	-25

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
7–13	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
14–20	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
21–27	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
28–34	—	—	21.43%	14.29%	—	—	—	35.71%
35–41	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42+	—	7.14%	14.29%	—	—	—	—	21.43%
Total	7.14%	7.14%	57.14%	14.29%	14.29%	—	—	100%

Houston Oilers — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	27.64	19.29	+8.36
SD	13.84	7.57	17.31
CV	0.50	0.39	—
Max	56	34	+39
Min	7	6	-24

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
7–13	—	—	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	14.29%
14–20	7.14%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	7.14%	14.29%	42.86%
21–27	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
28–34	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	21.43%
35–41	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42+	—	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%
Total	14.29%	—	21.43%	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	35.71%	100%

New York Titans — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	19.86	30.21	-10.36
SD	11.05	16.74	19.03
CV	0.56	0.55	—
Max	46	56	+20
Min	3	3	-39

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	21.43%
7–13	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%
14–20	7.14%	—	—	14.29%	21.43%	—	—	42.86%
21–27	—	—	—	—	14.29%	—	—	14.29%
28–34	—	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%
35–41	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	21.43%	35.71%	7.14%	14.29%	100%

Oakland Raiders — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	15.21	26.43	-11.21
SD	7.97	11.89	12.56
CV	0.52	0.45	—
Max	33	44	+20
Min	6	0	-37

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0–6	7–13	14–20	21–27	28–34	35–41	42+	Total
0–6	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
7–13	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%
14–20	—	—	7.14%	21.43%	—	7.14%	7.14%	42.86%
21–27	—	—	—	—	14.29%	—	—	14.29%
28–34	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
35–41	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
42+	—	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%
Total	—	—	14.29%	35.71%	28.57%	14.29%	7.14%	100%

San Diego Chargers — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	22.43	28.00	-5.57
SD	10.95	7.95	14.54
CV	0.49	0.28	—
Max	42	42	+26
Min	3	14	-25

Games Played: 14

Wins vs. Points Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Wins plotted against points scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in wins per 10 points).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.88	+0.6
Allowed	0.65	-0.4
Differential	0.89	+0.3

Home-Field Advantage Edge

A measure of how well each team has taken advantage of home-field advantage during the season. For each team, sum the win probabilities for home games and compare against the team's actual performance at home. Repeat for games on the road. Positive values indicate the team has played comparatively better at home than on the road. Negative values indicate the team is not utilizing home field advantage.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

The teams that deviated the most from the simulated results.

Top Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	Luck
1	Dallas Texans	11	9.49	+1.51
2	Buffalo Bills	7.5	6.14	+1.36
3	Denver Broncos	7	6.33	+0.67
4	Houston Oilers	11	10.46	+0.54
5	New York Titans	5	5.17	-0.17

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	Luck
1	San Diego Chargers	4	6.13	-2.13
2	Oakland Raiders	1	2.48	-1.48
3	Boston Patriots	9.5	9.79	-0.29
4	New York Titans	5	5.17	-0.17
5	Houston Oilers	11	10.46	+0.54

Top Streaks

The most unlikely streaks achieved by teams throughout the season according to the model's probabilities. Calculated by using the pregame win/tie/loss probabilities for all the games in each team's streak.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Denver Broncos	4	Sep 30 – Oct 21	1 in 18
2	Oakland Raiders	1	Dec 16 – Dec 16	1 in 17
3	Buffalo Bills	3	Oct 13 – Oct 28	1 in 17
4	Houston Oilers	7	Nov 4 – Dec 15	1 in 11
5	Dallas Texans	3	Sep 8 – Sep 30	1 in 5

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	San Diego Chargers	6	Oct 13 – Nov 25	1 in 34
2	Oakland Raiders	13	Sep 9 – Dec 9	1 in 18
3	Denver Broncos	5	Nov 11 – Dec 9	1 in 13
4	Buffalo Bills	5	Sep 9 – Oct 7	1 in 10
5	Houston Oilers	2	Oct 21 – Oct 28	1 in 9

Finish Position Heatmaps

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team finished in a given position in the simulation.

Team	1	2	3	4
Houston Oilers	60.90%	35.35%	3.41%	0.34%
Boston Patriots	37.52%	53.07%	8.21%	1.20%
Buffalo Bills	1.22%	8.38%	56.48%	33.92%
New York Titans	0.37%	3.20%	31.90%	64.54%

Team	1	2	3	4
Dallas Texans	84.18%	12.93%	2.83%	0.07%
Denver Broncos	8.76%	44.67%	42.04%	4.53%
San Diego Chargers	7.02%	41.02%	46.19%	5.76%
Oakland Raiders	0.05%	1.38%	8.94%	89.64%

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Houston Oilers	46.12%	29.48%	17.57%	4.84%	1.51%	0.39%	0.10%	<0.01%
Boston Patriots	29.26%	31.87%	24.57%	9.00%	3.56%	1.33%	0.38%	0.02%
Dallas Texans	22.27%	29.26%	30.78%	11.16%	4.38%	1.64%	0.48%	0.03%
Denver Broncos	0.98%	3.35%	8.97%	22.37%	23.86%	21.48%	15.75%	3.25%
Buffalo Bills	0.61%	2.76%	7.51%	20.25%	23.76%	23.56%	18.00%	3.55%
San Diego Chargers	0.61%	2.43%	7.44%	21.17%	23.77%	22.82%	17.50%	4.26%
New York Titans	0.16%	0.84%	3.11%	10.81%	17.69%	24.29%	32.86%	10.23%
Oakland Raiders	-	<0.01%	0.05%	0.39%	1.47%	4.50%	14.93%	78.65%

Win Totals in Context

How each team's actual results compared to their simulated results, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Click a division name in the legend to toggle it on or off.

Playoff Seed Probabilities

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team earned a given playoff seed in the simulation. Teams are sorted by likelihood of earning the top seed. Teams that missed the playoffs more often sit toward the bottom.

Team	1 Seed	Missed Playoffs
Houston Oilers	60.90%	39.10%
Boston Patriots	37.52%	62.48%
Buffalo Bills	1.22%	98.78%
New York Titans	0.37%	99.63%

Team	1 Seed	Missed Playoffs
Dallas Texans	84.18%	15.82%
Denver Broncos	8.76%	91.25%
San Diego Chargers	7.02%	92.98%
Oakland Raiders	0.05%	99.95%

Wins Required to Clinch Each Seed

The empirical cumulative distribution that shows the probability that a team earning that seed finished the regular season with at most a given number of wins. The point where each line passes through 50% is roughly the median wins for that seed.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Percentage of games won by the home team - percentage of games won by the away team
No Edge: under 2% · Slight Edge: 2% to 6% · Clear Edge: 6% to 10% · Fortress: 10% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points that 1 point is worth. A team this many Elo ratings points better than another would be expected to defeat their opponent by 1 point at a neutral location.
Scoring Tilt: Average home points - average away points per game. The gold line represents the expected home points edge according to the scoring value of a point of Elo and the number of Elo rating points home advantage is worth.
Road-Tilted: under -3.2 · Lean Road: -3.2 to 0 · Lean Home: 0 to 3.2 · Home-Tilted: 3.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeTieAway

+8.93%

Clear Edge

53.57%1.79%44.64%

Elo Value

Home Edge

33 Elo

0.030 points per Elo point

031.10100

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+1.48 points

Lean Home

-8+0.94+8

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of preseason title contenders. Calculated by taking 1 divided by the sum of squared preseason title odds. Higher numbers indicate more parity in the league while 1 indicates that the preseason favorite is a near-lock.
Front-Runner: under 2 · Few Contenders: 2 to 4 · Open Race: 4 to 8 · Wide Open: 8 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would win the title based on the simulated results. Location of the dot marks their rank across all teams, ranging from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st · Among the Favorites: 2nd · Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 4th · Longshot: 5th or lower.
Title Run Odds: Given that actual playoff bracket, the probability that the champion would win the exact series/games they faced in reality. The gold line represents their odds of winning if every series/game was a toss-up.
Long Shot: under 25% · Tough Road: 25% to 50% · Favored: 50% to 100% · Heavy Favorite: 100% and up.

Title-Race Openness

2.8

Few Contenders

1248

Champion Preseason Odds

45%

Dallas Texans, 1st of 8

LongshotFavorite

Title Run Odds

Coin-flip

45.6%

Tough Road

050.00%100%

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Average standard deviation of the difference between each team's actual wins total and their simulated average wins total. The gold line is the standard deviation the model expected from random chance alone.
Subdued: under 1.27 · As Expected: 1.27 to 1.75 · Elevated: 1.75 to 2.38 · High Variance: 2.38 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap in the rank of the final standings between where each team finished in the standings and where the model projected them to finish.
Pinpoint: under 0.82 · Close: 0.82 to 1.1 · Off Target: 1.1 to 1.44 · Well Off Target: 1.44 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team whose record finished in the highest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the top team in a league of 8 teams typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team whose record finished in the lowest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the bottom team in a league of 8 teams typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished either above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile. Even with a well-calibrated model, 10% of teams are expected to land in the extremes of their distributions.
Minimal Outliers: under 0.4 · As Expected: 0.4 to 0.96 · Several Outliers: 0.96 to 1.76 · Many Outliers: 1.76 and up.
Unexpected Playoff Teams: Number of teams that actually made the playoffs but were not in the model's projected field.The gold line represents how many playoff teams the simulation missed on average.
Fewer Than Expected: under 0.41 · As Expected: 0.41 to 0.69 · More Than Expected: 0.69 to 1.1 · Far More Than Expected: 1.1 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

1.28 wins

As Expected

01.594

Average Finish Error

Expected

0.88

00.962

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 93.75%

93.39%

Buffalo Bills

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected

18.07%

San Diego Chargers

06.25%50

Season Outliers

Expected

0 of 8

Minimal Outliers

00.88

Unexpected Playoff Teams

Expected

0 of 2

Fewer Than Expected

00.52

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: Measures how evenly wins were distributed across the league. Lower scores indicate there was less variability across the actual wins totals .Higher scores are an indication of more imbalance in the league with a few unusually strong or unusually weak teams.
Highly Balanced: under 0.08 · Balanced: 0.08 to 0.15 · Top-Heavy: 0.15 to 0.24 · Concentrated: 0.24 and up.
Noll-Scully: Measures how more times spread out the final standings were in reality compared to standings that were generated by flipping a coin for each game. The gold line at 1 indicates as much variability in the standings as s coin flip. Above it, talent gaps in team composition stretched the standings more than the variability produced by luck alone. Below it, the league was more competitive than coin flips alone would yield.
Compressed: under 0.9 · Coin-Flip Spread: 0.9 to 1.15 · Moderate Separation: 1.15 to 1.45 · Stratified: 1.45 and up.
Interquartile Edge: The probability that the team in the 75th percentile of the league's Elo ratings would defeat the team in the 25th percentile at a neutral site. The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league.
Even: under 58% · Competitive: 58% to 65% · Tilted: 65% to 73% · Lopsided: 73% and up.
Best vs. Worst: The probability that the team with the highest Elo rating would defeat the team with the lowest Elo rating at a neutral site.The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league. The gold line represents how high this probability is expected to be in a league of this size. A blue dot to the right indicates an unusually dominant team or an unusually weak team.
Tight: under 65% · Clear Edge: 65% to 78% · Lopsided: 78% to 88% · No Contest: 88% and up.
Close Games: Actual percentage of games decided by 3 run/points or fewer. The gold line indicates the proportion of close games you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Mostly Decisive: under 25% · Some Drama: 25% to 38% · Often Close: 38% to 50% · Nail-Biters: 50% and up.
Blowouts: Actual percentage of games decided by 17 runs/points or more. The gold line indicates the proportion of blowouts you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Rare: under 10% · Occasional: 10% to 20% · Frequent: 20% to 30% · Routine: 30% and up.

Gini Index

0.27

Concentrated

00.080.150.240.5

Noll-Scully

Coin-flip

1.45

Stratified

01.003

Interquartile Edge

83%

Lopsided

50%58%65%73%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline 96%

94%

No Contest

50%100%

Close Games

Expected

11%

Mostly Decisive

0%17%100%

Blowouts

Expected

38%

Routine

0%32%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame win probabilities aligned with the actual game result, averaged over the entire season. Picks that were both confident and correct are rewarded the most, while incorrect predictions and/or uncertain predictions are penalized more. Lower scores are better. 0 indicates every game was perfectly predicted with maximum confidence. For sports with where wins and losses are the only outcomes, Brier scores less than 0.25 indicate the model did better than random predictions. For sports where ties are possible, 0.67 is the cutoff for which the Brier score must be lower to beat random predictions. The lower the Brier score, the easier and more accurately the games were to predict.
Highly Predictable: under 0.18 · Predictable: 0.18 to 0.22 · Hard to Predict: 0.22 to 0.25 · Coin-Flip: 0.25 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, calculated by averaging the difference in the win probabilities divided by the sum of the win probabilities. Lower scores indicate more parity in the league. 0 indicates that every game was a 50-50 toss-up between evenly matched teams. 1 means every game pitted a heavy favorite against a huge underdog.
Evenly Matched: under 0.12 · Slight Separation: 0.12 to 0.22 · Wide Gaps: 0.22 to 0.34 · Lopsided: 0.34 and up.
Strangeness: How extreme the actual final standings were compared to what the model expected. A value of 0 would indicate that the simulated results perfectly matched the actual standings. A score of 1 indicates that the actual results were scattered around the projections by exactly the variance the model predicted. (i.e. The projections missed the actual standings by 1 standard deviation on average. Scores larger than 1 mean the season was wilder to forecast with more overperforming and underperforming teams than expected. Scores less than 1 indicate the season was more predictable.
Tighter Than Modeled: under 0.85 · As Expected: 0.85 to 1.15 · Volatile: 1.15 to 1.5 · Chaotic: 1.5 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the order of the final standings aligned with the ranked preseason Elo ratings as calculated by the Spearman rank correlation. Larger values indicate that the preseason Elo ratings were a strong predictor of the team's final rank in the standings while values near 0 mean.
Reshuffled: under 0.3 · Weak Alignment: 0.3 to 0.6 · Strong Alignment: 0.6 to 0.85 · Closely Aligned: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate: The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality. The gold line measures how often the model expected the underdog to win when considering the outcome probabilities. A blue dot to the right of the gold line means upsets were more prevalent than left. A dot to the left indicates that favorites won more often than expected.
Chalk Held: under 30% · As Expected: 30% to 40% · Upset-Prone: 40% to 46% · Bedlam: 46% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality, but only including games with a clear favorite, one at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside. This metrics ignores games that could be considered toss-ups. The gold line is how often the model expected these heavy favorites to lose. A dot to the right means the big favorites were upset more than expected; to the left means they took care of business.
Favorites Held: under 22% · As Expected: 22% to 32% · Shaky Favorites: 32% to 42% · Bedlam: 42% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.18

Predictable

00.181

Matchup Imbalance

0.48

Lopsided

00.120.220.340.5

Strangeness

Expected

0.68

Tighter Than Modeled

01.002

Repeatability

0.61

Strong Alignment

00.30.60.851

Upset Rate

Expected

30%

As Expected

0%25%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

27%

As Expected

0%23%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Games are sorted into bins according to how confident the model was. Within each bin, the predicted number of wins, losses, and ties are compared against the actual counts. The p-value of this test is plotted below. Values above 0.05 indicate that the model's probabilities are well-calibrated for the season.
Clear Misfit: under 0.01 · Misfit: 0.01 to 0.05 · Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 · Well Calibrated: 0.1 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the model's probabilities is correct. Each probability is turned into their log-odds. A line is fit that predicts the actual results from the log-odds. The slope of this line is the calibration slope.A slope of 1.00 is perfect, indicating that the model's confidence matches the actual outcomes of the games. Slopes less than 1.00 indicate overconfidence. The model assigned higher probabilities to the favorites than was appropriate given the matchup, causing more losses by favored teams. Slopes greater than 1.00 indicate under-confidence. The model is more uncertain about too many results, assigning them lower probabilities when in reality the favorites should have had higher probabilities.
Overconfident: under 0.85 · Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 · Underconfident: 1.15 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): Calibration error (ECE) checks whether the model's probabilities mean what they say. ECE is calculated as the average weighted gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted outcome actually occurred. The smaller the ECE, the more confident we are about the model's probabilities. The gold line represents the noise ceiling, which is the amount of error that luck can produce on its own even if the probabilities are perfectly calibrated. Values below the noise ceiling indicate that the model's error is no larger than chance alone would produce. Values above the noice ceiling point to a genuine calibration issue since the error is larger than luck could explain.
Well Within Noise: under 0.1 · Within Noise: 0.1 to 0.19 · Above Noise: 0.19 to 0.39 · Well Above Noise: 0.39 and up.

Probability calibration

0.65

Well Calibrated

0.010.050.11

Calibration slope

Ideal

0.91

Calibrated

0.51.001.5

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.123

Within Noise

00.1950.5

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual wins, simulated final wins, playoff probability, and division-title probability - day by day. Select a division to see all five charts for its teams.

Elo Through the Playoffs

How each playoff team's Elo rating evolved as the postseason unfolded. Elo Progression traces each team's game-by-game Elo rating through their playoff run. Net Elo Change summarizes the difference in Elo rating between the beginning and end of the playoffs for each team.

Stochastic Playoff Outcomes

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team	Made Playoffs	Won Championship Game
Dallas Texans	84.18%	45.40%
Houston Oilers	60.90%	36.35%
Boston Patriots	37.52%	14.67%
Denver Broncos	8.76%	2.04%
San Diego Chargers	7.02%	0.95%
Buffalo Bills	1.22%	0.52%
New York Titans	0.37%	0.07%
Oakland Raiders	0.05%	<0.01%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Dallas Texans	Denver Broncos	Oakland Raiders	San Diego Chargers	Boston Patriots	Buffalo Bills	Houston Oilers	New York Titans
Boston Patriots	32.8%31.65%	67.2%3.23%	80.0%0.03%	80.3%2.61%
Buffalo Bills	36.3%1.02%	73.9%0.11%		74.1%0.08%
Houston Oilers	54.7%51.20%	82.7%5.37%	87.0%0.02%	90.6%4.30%
New York Titans	13.0%0.31%	41.0%0.04%		65.0%0.02%
Dallas Texans					67.2%31.65%	63.7%1.02%	45.3%51.20%	87.0%0.31%
Denver Broncos					32.8%3.23%	26.1%0.11%	17.3%5.37%	59.0%0.04%
Oakland Raiders					20.0%0.03%		13.0%0.02%
San Diego Chargers					19.7%2.61%	25.9%0.08%	9.4%4.30%	35.0%0.02%

Actual Bracket Simulation

Team	Won Championship Game	Actual Outcome
Houston Oilers	54.42%	Eliminated in Championship Game
Dallas Texans	45.58%	Won Championship Game

Loser → ↓ Winner	Dallas Texans	Houston Oilers
Houston Oilers	54.4%100.00%
Dallas Texans		45.6%100.00%

Most-Likely Championship Paths

For each playoff team, what was the most likely path they had to the championship across all simulations? Tiles represent the opponent they faced and defeated the most often in each round.

Houston Oilers 54.42% chance to win

Championship Game

vs. Dallas Texans

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

54.42%

Dallas Texans 45.58% chance to win

Championship Game

vs. Houston Oilers

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

45.58%

Regular Season Games

Summary of every regular-season game played this season.

Filter by Team:

Date	Opponent	Score	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Loss %	Elo Δ	Record
1962-09-08	@ Dallas Texans	L 28-42	1632.31	1490.00	64.35%	33.59%	-57.11	0-1
1962-09-16	Houston Oilers	W 34-21	1575.20	1722.95	32.90%	65.06%	+55.63	1-1
1962-09-21	Denver Broncos	W 41-16	1630.83	1431.10	78.02%	20.42%	+24.40	2-1
1962-10-06	@ New York Titans	W 43-14	1655.23	1408.57	76.51%	21.86%	+28.15	3-1
1962-10-12	Dallas Texans	L 7-27	1683.38	1562.78	69.43%	28.66%	-73.53	3-2
1962-10-19	San Diego Chargers	W 24-20	1609.85	1460.76	72.73%	25.48%	+12.20	4-2
1962-10-26	Oakland Raiders	W 26-16	1622.05	1219.19	91.78%	7.50%	+5.60	5-2
1962-11-03	@ Buffalo Bills	T 28-28	1627.65	1495.11	63.07%	34.84%	-1.66	5-2
1962-11-11	@ Denver Broncos	W 33-29	1625.99	1551.44	55.09%	42.69%	+20.41	6-2
1962-11-18	@ Houston Oilers	L 17-21	1646.40	1658.90	42.67%	55.11%	-20.40	6-3
1962-11-23	Buffalo Bills	W 21-10	1626.00	1542.13	64.84%	33.11%	+26.31	7-3
1962-11-30	New York Titans	W 24-17	1652.31	1424.19	80.64%	17.93%	+11.33	8-3
1962-12-09	@ San Diego Chargers	W 20-14	1663.64	1348.97	82.69%	15.99%	+9.33	9-3
1962-12-16	@ Oakland Raiders	L 0-20	1672.97	1159.51	93.63%	5.80%	-98.14	9-4
1962-09-09	Houston Oilers	L 23-28	1457.35	1711.66	21.13%	77.27%	-11.30	0-1
1962-09-15	Denver Broncos	L 20-23	1446.05	1406.89	58.85%	38.98%	-24.21	0-2
1962-09-22	New York Titans	L 6-17	1421.84	1438.83	50.90%	46.85%	-40.23	0-3
1962-09-30	@ Dallas Texans	L 21-41	1381.61	1565.28	21.94%	76.43%	-23.46	0-4
1962-10-07	@ Houston Oilers	L 14-17	1358.15	1710.03	9.77%	89.33%	-4.01	0-5
1962-10-13	San Diego Chargers	W 35-10	1354.14	1543.94	27.86%	70.26%	+83.18	1-5
1962-10-20	Oakland Raiders	W 14-6	1437.32	1232.69	78.49%	19.97%	+13.50	2-5
1962-10-28	@ Denver Broncos	W 45-38	1450.82	1582.21	27.43%	70.71%	+44.29	3-5
1962-11-03	Boston Patriots	T 28-28	1495.11	1627.65	34.84%	63.07%	+1.66	3-5
1962-11-11	@ San Diego Chargers	W 40-20	1496.77	1374.15	61.74%	36.14%	+38.70	4-5
1962-11-18	@ Oakland Raiders	W 10-6	1535.47	1193.30	84.80%	14.01%	+6.66	5-5
1962-11-23	@ Boston Patriots	L 10-21	1542.13	1626.00	33.11%	64.84%	-26.31	5-6
1962-12-02	Dallas Texans	W 23-14	1515.82	1729.73	25.20%	73.03%	+51.84	6-6
1962-12-08	@ New York Titans	W 20-3	1567.66	1412.87	65.96%	32.03%	+31.63	7-6
1962-09-08	Boston Patriots	W 42-28	1490.00	1632.31	33.59%	64.35%	+57.11	1-0
1962-09-23	@ Oakland Raiders	W 26-16	1547.11	1321.92	74.26%	24.01%	+18.17	2-0
1962-09-30	Buffalo Bills	W 41-21	1565.28	1381.61	76.43%	21.94%	+23.46	3-0
1962-10-07	@ San Diego Chargers	L 28-32	1588.74	1517.98	54.56%	43.22%	-25.96	3-1
1962-10-12	@ Boston Patriots	W 27-7	1562.78	1683.38	28.66%	69.43%	+73.54	4-1
1962-10-21	New York Titans	W 20-17	1636.32	1364.53	84.20%	14.57%	+6.01	5-1
1962-10-28	@ Houston Oilers	W 31-7	1642.33	1676.33	39.69%	58.13%	+67.67	6-1
1962-11-04	Houston Oilers	L 6-14	1710.00	1608.66	67.06%	30.95%	-44.95	6-2
1962-11-11	@ New York Titans	W 52-31	1665.05	1434.41	74.85%	23.45%	+25.71	7-2
1962-11-18	@ Denver Broncos	W 24-3	1690.76	1531.03	66.59%	31.42%	+34.49	8-2
1962-11-25	Oakland Raiders	W 35-7	1725.25	1186.63	96.02%	3.60%	+4.48	9-2
1962-12-02	@ Buffalo Bills	L 14-23	1729.73	1515.82	73.03%	25.20%	-51.83	9-3
1962-12-09	Denver Broncos	W 17-10	1677.90	1461.32	79.61%	18.91%	+11.95	10-3
1962-12-16	San Diego Chargers	W 26-17	1689.85	1339.63	89.24%	9.86%	+7.00	11-3
1962-09-07	San Diego Chargers	W 30-21	1358.13	1534.14	29.46%	68.60%	+48.76	1-0
1962-09-15	@ Buffalo Bills	W 23-20	1406.89	1446.05	38.98%	58.85%	+24.21	2-0
1962-09-21	@ Boston Patriots	L 16-41	1431.10	1630.83	20.42%	78.02%	-24.40	2-1
1962-09-30	@ New York Titans	W 32-10	1406.70	1479.05	34.58%	63.33%	+70.48	3-1
1962-10-05	Oakland Raiders	W 44-7	1477.18	1284.12	77.37%	21.04%	+30.60	4-1
1962-10-14	@ Oakland Raiders	W 23-6	1507.78	1253.52	77.27%	21.14%	+20.83	5-1
1962-10-21	Houston Oilers	W 20-10	1528.61	1729.93	26.56%	71.60%	+53.60	6-1
1962-10-28	Buffalo Bills	L 38-45	1582.21	1450.82	70.71%	27.43%	-44.29	6-2
1962-11-04	@ San Diego Chargers	W 23-20	1537.92	1387.68	65.38%	32.59%	+13.52	7-2
1962-11-11	Boston Patriots	L 29-33	1551.44	1625.99	42.69%	55.09%	-20.41	7-3
1962-11-18	Dallas Texans	L 3-24	1531.03	1690.76	31.42%	66.59%	-34.49	7-4
1962-11-22	New York Titans	L 45-46	1496.54	1408.69	65.35%	32.62%	-15.50	7-5
1962-12-02	@ Houston Oilers	L 17-34	1481.04	1685.21	20.01%	78.45%	-19.72	7-6
1962-12-09	@ Dallas Texans	L 10-17	1461.32	1677.90	18.91%	79.61%	-11.95	7-7
1962-09-09	@ Buffalo Bills	W 28-23	1711.66	1457.35	77.27%	21.13%	+11.29	1-0
1962-09-16	@ Boston Patriots	L 21-34	1722.95	1575.20	65.06%	32.90%	-55.62	1-1
1962-09-23	@ San Diego Chargers	W 42-17	1667.33	1541.05	62.24%	35.66%	+42.70	2-1
1962-10-07	Buffalo Bills	W 17-14	1710.03	1358.15	89.33%	9.77%	+4.01	3-1
1962-10-14	New York Titans	W 56-17	1714.04	1380.42	88.31%	10.73%	+15.89	4-1
1962-10-21	@ Denver Broncos	L 10-20	1729.93	1528.61	71.60%	26.56%	-53.60	4-2
1962-10-28	Dallas Texans	L 7-31	1676.33	1642.33	58.13%	39.69%	-67.67	4-3
1962-11-04	@ Dallas Texans	W 14-6	1608.66	1710.00	30.95%	67.06%	+44.96	5-3
1962-11-11	@ Oakland Raiders	W 28-20	1653.62	1198.58	91.35%	7.90%	+5.28	6-3
1962-11-18	Boston Patriots	W 21-17	1658.90	1646.40	55.11%	42.67%	+20.40	7-3
1962-11-25	San Diego Chargers	W 33-27	1679.30	1335.45	88.89%	10.18%	+5.91	8-3
1962-12-02	Denver Broncos	W 34-17	1685.21	1481.04	78.45%	20.01%	+19.72	9-3
1962-12-09	Oakland Raiders	W 32-17	1704.93	1162.73	96.10%	3.53%	+3.21	10-3
1962-12-15	@ New York Titans	W 44-10	1708.14	1381.23	83.66%	15.08%	+20.95	11-3
1962-09-09	@ Oakland Raiders	W 28-17	1464.81	1351.60	60.47%	37.39%	+29.69	1-0
1962-09-16	@ San Diego Chargers	L 14-40	1494.50	1485.38	45.72%	52.03%	-55.67	1-1
1962-09-22	@ Buffalo Bills	W 17-6	1438.83	1421.84	46.85%	50.90%	+40.22	2-1
1962-09-30	Denver Broncos	L 10-32	1479.05	1406.70	63.33%	34.58%	-70.48	2-2
1962-10-06	Boston Patriots	L 14-43	1408.57	1655.23	21.86%	76.51%	-28.15	2-3
1962-10-14	@ Houston Oilers	L 17-56	1380.42	1714.04	10.73%	88.31%	-15.89	2-4
1962-10-21	@ Dallas Texans	L 17-20	1364.53	1636.32	14.57%	84.20%	-6.01	2-5
1962-10-28	San Diego Chargers	W 23-3	1358.52	1448.56	40.53%	57.27%	+60.88	3-5
1962-11-04	Oakland Raiders	W 31-21	1419.40	1213.59	78.60%	19.87%	+15.01	4-5
1962-11-11	Dallas Texans	L 31-52	1434.41	1665.05	23.45%	74.85%	-25.72	4-6
1962-11-22	@ Denver Broncos	W 46-45	1408.69	1496.54	32.62%	65.35%	+15.50	5-6
1962-11-30	@ Boston Patriots	L 17-24	1424.19	1652.31	17.93%	80.64%	-11.32	5-7
1962-12-08	Buffalo Bills	L 3-20	1412.87	1567.66	32.03%	65.96%	-31.64	5-8
1962-12-15	Houston Oilers	L 10-44	1381.23	1708.14	15.08%	83.66%	-20.94	5-9
1962-09-09	New York Titans	L 17-28	1351.60	1464.81	37.39%	60.47%	-29.68	0-1
1962-09-23	Dallas Texans	L 16-26	1321.92	1547.11	24.01%	74.26%	-18.17	0-2
1962-09-30	San Diego Chargers	L 33-42	1303.75	1498.36	27.31%	70.83%	-19.63	0-3
1962-10-05	@ Denver Broncos	L 7-44	1284.12	1477.18	21.04%	77.37%	-30.60	0-4
1962-10-14	Denver Broncos	L 6-23	1253.52	1507.78	21.14%	77.27%	-20.83	0-5
1962-10-20	@ Buffalo Bills	L 6-14	1232.69	1437.32	19.97%	78.49%	-13.50	0-6
1962-10-26	@ Boston Patriots	L 16-26	1219.19	1622.05	7.50%	91.78%	-5.60	0-7
1962-11-04	@ New York Titans	L 21-31	1213.59	1419.40	19.87%	78.60%	-15.01	0-8
1962-11-11	Houston Oilers	L 20-28	1198.58	1653.62	7.90%	91.35%	-5.28	0-9
1962-11-18	Buffalo Bills	L 6-10	1193.30	1535.47	14.01%	84.80%	-6.67	0-10
1962-11-25	@ Dallas Texans	L 7-35	1186.63	1725.25	3.60%	96.02%	-4.48	0-11
1962-12-02	@ San Diego Chargers	L 21-31	1182.15	1329.54	25.66%	72.54%	-19.42	0-12
1962-12-09	@ Houston Oilers	L 17-32	1162.73	1704.93	3.53%	96.10%	-3.22	0-13
1962-12-16	Boston Patriots	W 20-0	1159.51	1672.97	5.80%	93.63%	+98.14	1-13
1962-09-07	@ Denver Broncos	L 21-30	1534.14	1358.13	68.60%	29.46%	-48.76	0-1
1962-09-16	New York Titans	W 40-14	1485.38	1494.50	52.03%	45.72%	+55.67	1-1
1962-09-23	Houston Oilers	L 17-42	1541.05	1667.33	35.66%	62.24%	-42.69	1-2
1962-09-30	@ Oakland Raiders	W 42-33	1498.36	1303.75	70.83%	27.31%	+19.62	2-2
1962-10-07	Dallas Texans	W 32-28	1517.98	1588.74	43.22%	54.56%	+25.96	3-2
1962-10-13	@ Buffalo Bills	L 10-35	1543.94	1354.14	70.26%	27.86%	-83.18	3-3
1962-10-19	@ Boston Patriots	L 20-24	1460.76	1609.85	25.48%	72.73%	-12.20	3-4
1962-10-28	@ New York Titans	L 3-23	1448.56	1358.52	57.27%	40.53%	-60.88	3-5
1962-11-04	Denver Broncos	L 20-23	1387.68	1537.92	32.59%	65.38%	-13.53	3-6
1962-11-11	Buffalo Bills	L 20-40	1374.15	1496.77	36.14%	61.74%	-38.70	3-7
1962-11-25	@ Houston Oilers	L 27-33	1335.45	1679.30	10.18%	88.89%	-5.91	3-8
1962-12-02	Oakland Raiders	W 31-21	1329.54	1182.15	72.54%	25.66%	+19.43	4-8
1962-12-09	Boston Patriots	L 14-20	1348.97	1663.64	15.99%	82.69%	-9.34	4-9
1962-12-16	@ Dallas Texans	L 17-26	1339.63	1689.85	9.86%	89.24%	-7.01	4-10

Playoff Games

Every playoff game from the selected team's perspective.

Date	Opponent	Score	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Loss %	Elo Δ	Record
1962-12-23	@ Houston Oilers	W 20-17	1696.85	1729.09	40.99%	59.01%	+23.83	1-0
1962-12-23	Dallas Texans	L 17-20	1729.09	1696.85	59.01%	40.99%	-23.83	0-1

Biggest Upsets

The 25 biggest upsets of the seasons, ranked by lowest pregame win probability. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	1962-12-16	5.80%	@ Oakland Raiders	1159.51	20	Boston Patriots	1672.97	0
2	1962-12-02	25.20%	@ Buffalo Bills	1515.82	23	Dallas Texans	1729.73	14
3	1962-10-21	26.56%	@ Denver Broncos	1528.61	20	Houston Oilers	1729.93	10
4	1962-10-28	27.43%	Buffalo Bills	1450.82	45	@ Denver Broncos	1582.21	38
5	1962-10-13	27.86%	@ Buffalo Bills	1354.14	35	San Diego Chargers	1543.94	10
6	1962-10-12	28.66%	Dallas Texans	1562.78	27	@ Boston Patriots	1683.38	7
7	1962-09-07	29.46%	@ Denver Broncos	1358.13	30	San Diego Chargers	1534.14	21
8	1962-11-04	30.95%	Houston Oilers	1608.66	14	@ Dallas Texans	1710.00	6
9	1962-11-22	32.62%	New York Titans	1408.69	46	@ Denver Broncos	1496.54	45
10	1962-09-16	32.90%	@ Boston Patriots	1575.20	34	Houston Oilers	1722.95	21
11	1962-09-08	33.59%	@ Dallas Texans	1490.00	42	Boston Patriots	1632.31	28
12	1962-09-30	34.58%	Denver Broncos	1406.70	32	@ New York Titans	1479.05	10
13	1962-09-15	38.98%	Denver Broncos	1406.89	23	@ Buffalo Bills	1446.05	20
14	1962-10-28	39.69%	Dallas Texans	1642.33	31	@ Houston Oilers	1676.33	7
15	1962-10-28	40.53%	@ New York Titans	1358.52	23	San Diego Chargers	1448.56	3
16	1962-12-23 *	40.99%	Dallas Texans	1696.85	20	@ Houston Oilers	1729.09	17
17	1962-10-07	43.22%	@ San Diego Chargers	1517.98	32	Dallas Texans	1588.74	28
18	1962-09-22	46.85%	New York Titans	1438.83	17	@ Buffalo Bills	1421.84	6

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %
1	1962-12-16	98.14	@ Oakland Raiders	20	1159.51	5.80%	Boston Patriots	0	1672.97	93.63%
2	1962-10-13	83.18	@ Buffalo Bills	35	1354.14	27.86%	San Diego Chargers	10	1543.94	70.26%
3	1962-10-12	73.54	Dallas Texans	27	1562.78	28.66%	@ Boston Patriots	7	1683.38	69.43%
4	1962-09-30	70.48	Denver Broncos	32	1406.70	34.58%	@ New York Titans	10	1479.05	63.33%
5	1962-10-28	67.67	Dallas Texans	31	1642.33	39.69%	@ Houston Oilers	7	1676.33	58.13%
6	1962-10-28	60.88	@ New York Titans	23	1358.52	40.53%	San Diego Chargers	3	1448.56	57.27%
7	1962-09-08	57.11	@ Dallas Texans	42	1490.00	33.59%	Boston Patriots	28	1632.31	64.35%
8	1962-09-16	55.67	@ San Diego Chargers	40	1485.38	52.03%	New York Titans	14	1494.50	45.72%
9	1962-09-16	55.63	@ Boston Patriots	34	1575.20	32.90%	Houston Oilers	21	1722.95	65.06%
10	1962-10-21	53.60	@ Denver Broncos	20	1528.61	26.56%	Houston Oilers	10	1729.93	71.60%
11	1962-12-02	51.84	@ Buffalo Bills	23	1515.82	25.20%	Dallas Texans	14	1729.73	73.03%
12	1962-09-07	48.76	@ Denver Broncos	30	1358.13	29.46%	San Diego Chargers	21	1534.14	68.60%
13	1962-11-04	44.96	Houston Oilers	14	1608.66	30.95%	@ Dallas Texans	6	1710.00	67.06%
14	1962-10-28	44.29	Buffalo Bills	45	1450.82	27.43%	@ Denver Broncos	38	1582.21	70.71%
15	1962-09-23	42.70	Houston Oilers	42	1667.33	62.24%	@ San Diego Chargers	17	1541.05	35.66%
16	1962-09-22	40.23	New York Titans	17	1438.83	46.85%	@ Buffalo Bills	6	1421.84	50.90%
17	1962-11-11	38.70	Buffalo Bills	40	1496.77	61.74%	@ San Diego Chargers	20	1374.15	36.14%
18	1962-11-18	34.49	Dallas Texans	24	1690.76	66.59%	@ Denver Broncos	3	1531.03	31.42%
19	1962-12-08	31.64	Buffalo Bills	20	1567.66	65.96%	@ New York Titans	3	1412.87	32.03%
20	1962-10-05	30.60	@ Denver Broncos	44	1477.18	77.37%	Oakland Raiders	7	1284.12	21.04%
21	1962-09-09	29.69	New York Titans	28	1464.81	60.47%	@ Oakland Raiders	17	1351.60	37.39%
22	1962-10-06	28.15	Boston Patriots	43	1655.23	76.51%	@ New York Titans	14	1408.57	21.86%
23	1962-11-23	26.31	@ Boston Patriots	21	1626.00	64.84%	Buffalo Bills	10	1542.13	33.11%
24	1962-10-07	25.96	@ San Diego Chargers	32	1517.98	43.22%	Dallas Texans	28	1588.74	54.56%
25	1962-11-11	25.72	Dallas Texans	52	1665.05	74.85%	@ New York Titans	31	1434.41	23.45%