Home / Leagues / WNBA / 1998

1998 WNBA Season

150 regular-season games · 3 playoff teams

Final

Champion

Houston Comets

2nd Title

Last Title: 1997

Runner-Up

Charlotte Sting

1st Appearance

Biggest Overachiever

Detroit Shock

4.43 wins above expected

17 wins · 12.57 expected wins

Biggest Disappointment

Washington Mystics

3.23 wins below expected

3 wins · 6.23 expected wins

Final Standings

Final regular season records. The vsSim column shows actual wins minus the simulation's mean wins - positive values indicate the team overachieved, negative values mean they underperformed.

# Team W L Pct GB PPG OPP DIFF SimW vsSim
1 Cleveland Rockers 20 10 .667 - 73.1 70.3 +2.8 17.55 +2.45
2 Charlotte Sting Playoffs 18 12 .600 2 71.4 68.4 +3.1 18.30 -0.30
3 New York Liberty 18 12 .600 2 68.6 65.5 +3.1 16.67 +1.33
4 Detroit Shock 17 13 .567 3 69.6 69.3 +0.3 12.57 +4.43
5 Washington Mystics 3 27 .100 17 65.1 80.5 -15.4 6.23 -3.23
# Team W L Pct GB PPG OPP DIFF SimW vsSim
1 Houston Comets League 27 3 .900 - 76.2 63.5 +12.7 24.15 +2.85
2 Phoenix Mercury Playoffs 19 11 .633 8 73.9 67.5 +6.4 19.14 -0.14
3 Los Angeles Sparks 12 18 .400 15 71.6 72.3 -0.7 14.91 -2.91
4 Sacramento Monarchs 8 22 .267 19 63.9 69.4 -5.5 10.65 -2.65
5 Utah Starzz 8 22 .267 19 69.8 76.5 -6.7 9.83 -1.83

Playoff Bracket

Eastern Conference

Western Conference

Conference Final

Houston Comets 2
Phoenix Mercury 1

3 games · Aug 27–Sep 1

WNBA Finals

Houston Comets 2
Charlotte Sting 0

2 games · Aug 22–Aug 24

Season Summary

Every team's regular season finish compared against the simulated win totals. Click on any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual total minus the simulation's mean. Positive values indicate the team outperformed the expected total; negative values indicate the team was unluckier than expected. Percentile represents where their actual result fell in the simulated distribution.

Team Conference Division Elo Actual Avg. Wins Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Houston Comets Western 1807 27 24.15 +2.85 95.89% 14 21 23 24 26 27 30
Cleveland Rockers Eastern 1653 20 17.55 +2.45 88.98% 6 14 16 18 19 21 27
Phoenix Mercury Western 1627 19 19.14 -0.14 55.50% 8 15 18 19 21 23 28
New York Liberty Eastern 1604 18 16.67 +1.33 76.59% 5 13 15 17 18 21 27
Detroit Shock Eastern 1539 17 12.57 +4.43 97.63% 3 9 11 13 14 17 23
Charlotte Sting Eastern 1500 18 18.30 -0.30 52.85% 7 14 17 18 20 22 28
Los Angeles Sparks Western 1497 12 14.91 -2.91 16.85% 5 11 13 15 17 19 25
Sacramento Monarchs Western 1338 8 10.65 -2.65 18.98% 2 7 9 11 12 15 22
Utah Starzz Western 1293 8 9.83 -1.83 29.28% 1 6 8 10 11 14 23
Washington Mystics Eastern 1141 3 6.23 -3.23 8.60% 0 3 5 6 8 10 16

Head-to-Head

Cells show each team's record against each opponent with the expected wins from the simulation below Gold-tinted cells indicate the team beat the model's expectations by more than a half-win while navy-tinted cells indicate they fell short by more than a half-win. The first table covers within-division games while the second covers games against teams outside the division.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Within Eastern

Team Sting Rockers Shock Liberty Mystics
Charlotte Sting
1-3
(2.1 exp.)
3-1
(2.9 exp.)
3-1
(2.1 exp.)
4-0
(3.4 exp.)
Cleveland Rockers
3-1
(1.9 exp.)
2-2
(2.9 exp.)
3-1
(2.0 exp.)
4-0
(3.4 exp.)
Detroit Shock
1-3
(1.1 exp.)
2-2
(1.1 exp.)
2-2
(1.5 exp.)
3-1
(2.6 exp.)
New York Liberty
1-3
(1.9 exp.)
1-3
(2.0 exp.)
2-2
(2.5 exp.)
4-0
(3.5 exp.)
Washington Mystics
0-4
(0.6 exp.)
0-4
(0.6 exp.)
1-3
(1.4 exp.)
0-4
(0.5 exp.)

Eastern vs. Outside Teams

Team Comets Sparks Mercury Monarchs Starzz
Charlotte Sting
0-3
(0.9 exp.)
1-2
(1.7 exp.)
2-0
(0.8 exp.)
2-1
(2.3 exp.)
2-1
(2.1 exp.)
Cleveland Rockers
1-2
(0.7 exp.)
1-1
(1.1 exp.)
0-3
(1.4 exp.)
3-0
(1.9 exp.)
3-0
(2.2 exp.)
Detroit Shock
0-2
(0.3 exp.)
3-0
(1.5 exp.)
0-3
(0.9 exp.)
3-0
(1.8 exp.)
3-0
(1.8 exp.)
New York Liberty
1-2
(0.9 exp.)
2-1
(1.5 exp.)
3-0
(1.3 exp.)
3-0
(1.8 exp.)
1-1
(1.3 exp.)
Washington Mystics
0-3
(0.1 exp.)
1-2
(0.6 exp.)
0-3
(0.4 exp.)
0-2
(0.7 exp.)
1-2
(1.3 exp.)

Within Western

Team Comets Sparks Mercury Monarchs Starzz
Houston Comets
4-0
(3.1 exp.)
3-1
(2.9 exp.)
4-0
(3.5 exp.)
4-0
(3.6 exp.)
Los Angeles Sparks
0-4
(0.9 exp.)
2-2
(1.4 exp.)
1-3
(2.5 exp.)
3-1
(2.6 exp.)
Phoenix Mercury
1-3
(1.1 exp.)
2-2
(2.6 exp.)
4-0
(3.0 exp.)
3-1
(3.2 exp.)
Sacramento Monarchs
0-4
(0.5 exp.)
3-1
(1.5 exp.)
0-4
(1.0 exp.)
2-2
(2.1 exp.)
Utah Starzz
0-4
(0.4 exp.)
1-3
(1.4 exp.)
1-3
(0.8 exp.)
2-2
(1.9 exp.)

Western vs. Outside Teams

Team Sting Rockers Shock Liberty Mystics
Houston Comets
3-0
(2.1 exp.)
2-1
(2.3 exp.)
2-0
(1.7 exp.)
2-1
(2.1 exp.)
3-0
(2.9 exp.)
Los Angeles Sparks
2-1
(1.3 exp.)
1-1
(0.9 exp.)
0-3
(1.5 exp.)
1-2
(1.5 exp.)
2-1
(2.4 exp.)
Phoenix Mercury
0-2
(1.2 exp.)
3-0
(1.6 exp.)
3-0
(2.1 exp.)
0-3
(1.7 exp.)
3-0
(2.6 exp.)
Sacramento Monarchs
1-2
(0.7 exp.)
0-3
(1.1 exp.)
0-3
(1.2 exp.)
0-3
(1.2 exp.)
2-0
(1.3 exp.)
Utah Starzz
1-2
(0.9 exp.)
0-3
(0.8 exp.)
0-3
(1.2 exp.)
1-1
(0.7 exp.)
2-1
(1.7 exp.)

Scoreline Distribution

Cells represent the percentage of games that ended with a team's points in the row and its opponent's points in the column. Cells below the diagonal are wins (gold), and cells above are losses (blue). Totals along the edges show the marginal percentages for that row or column.

Win Loss Same range
↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<500.33%1.00%0.67%0.33%2.33%
50–590.33%3.33%4.00%4.00%1.67%13.33%
60–691.00%4.00%7.33%14.33%5.33%1.33%33.33%
70–790.67%4.00%14.33%11.33%3.00%0.67%34.00%
80–890.33%1.67%5.33%3.00%1.33%1.67%13.33%
90+1.33%0.67%1.67%3.67%
Total2.33%13.33%33.33%34.00%13.33%3.67%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 70.31 70.31 +0.00
SD 10.78 10.78 14.49
CV 0.15 0.15
Max 110 110 +45
Min 41 41 -45

Games Played: 150

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<503.33%3.33%
50–593.33%13.33%16.67%
60–693.33%6.67%6.67%6.67%23.33%
70–793.33%20.00%10.00%6.67%40.00%
80–896.67%3.33%10.00%
90+3.33%3.33%6.67%
Total16.67%50.00%16.67%16.67%100%

Charlotte Sting — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 71.43 68.37 +3.07
SD 11.78 9.70 13.64
CV 0.16 0.14
Max 105 86 +36
Min 49 50 -18

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<50
50–593.33%3.33%6.67%
60–6913.33%3.33%13.33%6.67%36.67%
70–793.33%16.67%6.67%3.33%30.00%
80–896.67%6.67%3.33%16.67%
90+3.33%6.67%10.00%
Total20.00%26.67%33.33%20.00%100%

Cleveland Rockers — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 73.10 70.33 +2.77
SD 10.84 9.80 12.52
CV 0.15 0.14
Max 96 87 +20
Min 57 51 -21

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<50
50–593.33%3.33%3.33%3.33%3.33%16.67%
60–693.33%3.33%6.67%16.67%3.33%33.33%
70–796.67%13.33%16.67%36.67%
80–896.67%3.33%3.33%13.33%
90+
Total6.67%13.33%30.00%40.00%3.33%6.67%100%

Detroit Shock — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 69.57 69.27 +0.30
SD 9.64 11.91 12.73
CV 0.14 0.17
Max 85 96 +17
Min 50 41 -30

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<50
50–593.33%3.33%
60–696.67%6.67%13.33%
70–796.67%10.00%36.67%6.67%60.00%
80–8913.33%3.33%16.67%
90+6.67%6.67%
Total6.67%16.67%63.33%13.33%100%

Houston Comets — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 76.17 63.47 +12.70
SD 10.39 6.98 11.86
CV 0.14 0.11
Max 110 74 +45
Min 54 44 -16

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<50
50–596.67%6.67%
60–693.33%3.33%23.33%6.67%36.67%
70–793.33%10.00%16.67%3.33%3.33%36.67%
80–896.67%10.00%3.33%20.00%
90+
Total13.33%20.00%50.00%13.33%3.33%100%

Los Angeles Sparks — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 71.60 72.30 -0.70
SD 9.35 8.69 10.83
CV 0.13 0.12
Max 89 92 +21
Min 56 52 -18

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<50
50–596.67%3.33%6.67%16.67%
60–696.67%3.33%13.33%13.33%6.67%43.33%
70–796.67%10.00%10.00%26.67%
80–893.33%6.67%10.00%
90+3.33%3.33%
Total10.00%16.67%33.33%33.33%6.67%100%

New York Liberty — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 68.60 65.53 +3.07
SD 9.93 10.70 14.83
CV 0.14 0.16
Max 92 82 +43
Min 51 45 -25

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<50
50–593.33%3.33%
60–693.33%16.67%13.33%33.33%
70–7923.33%13.33%36.67%
80–896.67%10.00%3.33%3.33%23.33%
90+3.33%3.33%
Total10.00%53.33%30.00%3.33%3.33%100%

Phoenix Mercury — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 73.90 67.50 +6.40
SD 9.24 7.61 12.12
CV 0.13 0.11
Max 96 90 +33
Min 56 54 -15

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<503.33%6.67%3.33%13.33%
50–596.67%10.00%6.67%23.33%
60–693.33%13.33%10.00%26.67%
70–793.33%10.00%13.33%6.67%33.33%
80–893.33%3.33%
90+
Total16.67%30.00%36.67%16.67%100%

Sacramento Monarchs — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 63.87 69.40 -5.53
SD 11.21 9.77 12.47
CV 0.18 0.14
Max 82 88 +27
Min 41 50 -31

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<50
50–593.33%3.33%3.33%3.33%13.33%
60–693.33%10.00%26.67%6.67%3.33%50.00%
70–793.33%10.00%6.67%20.00%
80–893.33%3.33%3.33%10.00%
90+6.67%6.67%
Total6.67%16.67%43.33%26.67%6.67%100%

Utah Starzz — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 69.77 76.47 -6.70
SD 9.91 9.91 10.91
CV 0.14 0.13
Max 99 96 +11
Min 55 57 -33

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →<5050–5960–6970–7980–8990+Total
<503.33%3.33%6.67%
50–596.67%10.00%10.00%26.67%
60–693.33%16.67%10.00%6.67%36.67%
70–793.33%10.00%3.33%3.33%20.00%
80–893.33%6.67%10.00%
90+
Total3.33%10.00%43.33%26.67%16.67%100%

Washington Mystics — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 65.13 80.50 -15.37
SD 10.53 11.78 14.18
CV 0.16 0.15
Max 88 110 +25
Min 45 53 -45

Games Played: 30

Wins vs. Points Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Wins plotted against points scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in wins per 10 points).

Fit Metrics

Slope
Scored 0.69 +15.6
Allowed 0.75 -12.3
Differential 0.94 +8.9

Home-Field Advantage Edge

A measure of how well each team has taken advantage of home-field advantage during the season. For each team, sum the win probabilities for home games and compare against the team's actual performance at home. Repeat for games on the road. Positive values indicate the team has played comparatively better at home than on the road. Negative values indicate the team is not utilizing home field advantage.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

The teams that deviated the most from the simulated results.

Top Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 Detroit Shock 17 12.57 +4.43
2 Houston Comets 27 24.15 +2.85
3 Cleveland Rockers 20 17.55 +2.45
4 New York Liberty 18 16.67 +1.33
5 Phoenix Mercury 19 19.14 -0.14

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 Washington Mystics 3 6.23 -3.23
2 Los Angeles Sparks 12 14.91 -2.91
3 Sacramento Monarchs 8 10.65 -2.65
4 Utah Starzz 8 9.83 -1.83
5 Charlotte Sting 18 18.30 -0.30

Top Streaks

The most unlikely streaks achieved by teams throughout the season according to the model's probabilities. Calculated by using the pregame win/loss probabilities for all the games in each team's streak.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Detroit Shock 6 Jun 21 – Jul 1 1 in 310
2 New York Liberty 6 Jul 18 – Aug 2 1 in 64
3 Houston Comets 15 Jun 27 – Jul 30 1 in 18
4 Charlotte Sting 5 Jun 18 – Jun 27 1 in 15
5 Sacramento Monarchs 2 Jul 26 – Jul 27 1 in 12

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Phoenix Mercury 5 Jul 21 – Jul 31 1 in 56
2 Los Angeles Sparks 5 Jun 21 – Jul 2 1 in 38
3 Washington Mystics 11 Jul 13 – Aug 7 1 in 17
4 Charlotte Sting 4 Aug 8 – Aug 14 1 in 13
5 Cleveland Rockers 2 Jun 23 – Jun 27 1 in 11

Finish Position Heatmaps

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team finished in a given position in the simulation.

Team12345
Charlotte Sting45.01%31.22%19.71%4.02%0.03%
Cleveland Rockers32.20%34.10%27.67%6.01%0.03%
New York Liberty21.50%29.92%36.89%11.58%0.11%
Detroit Shock1.29%4.76%15.63%74.62%3.69%
Washington Mystics-<0.01%0.10%3.77%96.12%
Team12345
Houston Comets93.11%6.69%0.21%--
Phoenix Mercury6.55%80.33%12.27%0.78%0.08%
Los Angeles Sparks0.34%12.10%69.31%14.60%3.66%
Sacramento Monarchs<0.01%0.59%11.32%48.28%39.81%
Utah Starzz-0.30%6.90%36.34%56.46%
Team12345678910
Houston Comets87.84%9.38%2.07%0.56%0.13%0.02%<0.01%---
Phoenix Mercury5.63%35.32%26.14%17.18%9.75%4.48%1.19%0.26%0.04%<0.01%
Charlotte Sting3.32%23.71%25.19%21.10%15.05%8.14%2.75%0.63%0.12%0.01%
Cleveland Rockers1.77%16.93%21.63%22.98%19.40%11.63%4.20%1.22%0.23%0.01%
New York Liberty1.18%10.85%16.20%20.76%22.63%17.11%7.92%2.70%0.61%0.04%
Los Angeles Sparks0.25%3.24%6.95%12.39%20.27%28.22%17.68%8.01%2.73%0.25%
Detroit Shock0.01%0.49%1.48%3.74%8.49%17.88%32.52%22.41%10.94%2.04%
Sacramento Monarchs<0.01%0.06%0.25%0.89%2.81%7.60%19.04%32.70%29.48%7.18%
Utah Starzz-0.02%0.10%0.40%1.44%4.77%13.76%27.69%38.72%13.10%
Washington Mystics---<0.01%0.02%0.14%0.95%4.39%17.14%77.37%

Win Totals in Context

How each team's actual results compared to their simulated results, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Click a division name in the legend to toggle it on or off.

Playoff Seed Probabilities

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team earned a given playoff seed in the simulation. Teams are sorted by likelihood of earning the top seed. Teams that missed the playoffs more often sit toward the bottom.

Team1 Seed2 Seed3 Seed4 SeedMissed Playoffs
Houston Comets87.84%9.38%2.07%0.56%0.15%
Phoenix Mercury5.63%35.32%26.14%17.18%15.72%
Charlotte Sting3.32%23.71%25.19%21.10%26.70%
Cleveland Rockers1.77%16.93%21.63%22.98%36.69%
New York Liberty1.18%10.85%16.20%20.76%51.01%
Los Angeles Sparks0.25%3.24%6.95%12.39%77.17%
Detroit Shock0.01%0.49%1.48%3.74%94.28%
Sacramento Monarchs<0.01%0.06%0.25%0.89%98.81%
Utah Starzz-0.02%0.10%0.40%99.47%
Washington Mystics---<0.01%100.00%

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Percentage of games won by the home team - percentage of games won by the away team
No Edge: under 2% · Slight Edge: 2% to 6% · Clear Edge: 6% to 10% · Fortress: 10% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points that 1 point is worth. A team this many Elo ratings points better than another would be expected to defeat their opponent by 1 point at a neutral location.
Scoring Tilt
Average home points - average away points per game. The gold line represents the expected home points edge according to the scoring value of a point of Elo and the number of Elo rating points home advantage is worth.
Road-Tilted: under -3.2 · Lean Road: -3.2 to 0 · Lean Home: 0 to 3.2 · Home-Tilted: 3.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeAway
+20.00%
Fortress
60.00%40.00%
Elo Value
Home Edge: 70.44 Elo pts.
24 Elo
0.042 points per Elo point
060
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+2.93 points
Lean Home
-8+2.95+8

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of preseason title contenders. Calculated by taking 1 divided by the sum of squared preseason title odds. Higher numbers indicate more parity in the league while 1 indicates that the preseason favorite is a near-lock.
Front-Runner: under 2 · Few Contenders: 2 to 4 · Open Race: 4 to 8 · Wide Open: 8 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would win the title based on the simulated results. Location of the dot marks their rank across all teams, ranging from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st · Among the Favorites: 2nd · Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 5th · Longshot: 6th or lower.
Title Run Odds
Given that actual playoff bracket, the probability that the champion would win the exact series/games they faced in reality. The gold line represents their odds of winning if every series/game was a toss-up.
Long Shot: under 12.5% · Tough Road: 12.5% to 25% · Favored: 25% to 50% · Heavy Favorite: 50% and up.
Title-Race Openness
2.0
Front-Runner
124810
Champion Preseason Odds
70%
Houston Comets, 1st of 10
LongshotFavorite
Title Run Odds
Coin-flip
71.4%
Heavy Favorite
025.00%100%

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Average standard deviation of the difference between each team's actual wins total and their simulated average wins total. The gold line is the standard deviation the model expected from random chance alone.
Subdued: under 1.9 · As Expected: 1.9 to 2.61 · Elevated: 2.61 to 3.56 · High Variance: 3.56 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap in the rank of the final standings between where each team finished in the standings and where the model projected them to finish.
Pinpoint: under 0.75 · Close: 0.75 to 1.02 · Off Target: 1.02 to 1.33 · Well Off Target: 1.33 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team whose record finished in the highest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the top team in a league of 10 teams typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team whose record finished in the lowest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the bottom team in a league of 10 teams typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished either above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile. Even with a well-calibrated model, 10% of teams are expected to land in the extremes of their distributions.
Minimal Outliers: under 0.5 · As Expected: 0.5 to 1.2 · Several Outliers: 1.2 to 2.2 · Many Outliers: 2.2 and up.
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Number of teams that actually made the playoffs but were not in the model's projected field.The gold line represents how many playoff teams the simulation missed on average.
Fewer Than Expected: under 0.59 · As Expected: 0.59 to 0.99 · More Than Expected: 0.99 to 1.59 · Far More Than Expected: 1.59 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
2.55 wins
As Expected
02.376
Average Finish Error
Expected
0.80
Close
00.892
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.00%
97.63%
Detroit Shock
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 5.00%
8.60%
Washington Mystics
050
Season Outliers
Expected
2 of 10
Several Outliers
01.010
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Expected
0 of 4
Fewer Than Expected
00.84

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
Measures how evenly wins were distributed across the league. Lower scores indicate there was less variability across the actual wins totals .Higher scores are an indication of more imbalance in the league with a few unusually strong or unusually weak teams.
Highly Balanced: under 0.08 · Balanced: 0.08 to 0.15 · Top-Heavy: 0.15 to 0.24 · Concentrated: 0.24 and up.
Noll-Scully
Measures how more times spread out the final standings were in reality compared to standings that were generated by flipping a coin for each game. The gold line at 1 indicates as much variability in the standings as s coin flip. Above it, talent gaps in team composition stretched the standings more than the variability produced by luck alone. Below it, the league was more competitive than coin flips alone would yield.
Compressed: under 0.9 · Coin-Flip Spread: 0.9 to 1.15 · Moderate Separation: 1.15 to 1.45 · Stratified: 1.45 and up.
Interquartile Edge
The probability that the team in the 75th percentile of the league's Elo ratings would defeat the team in the 25th percentile at a neutral site. The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league.
Even: under 58% · Competitive: 58% to 65% · Tilted: 65% to 73% · Lopsided: 73% and up.
Best vs. Worst
The probability that the team with the highest Elo rating would defeat the team with the lowest Elo rating at a neutral site.The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league. The gold line represents how high this probability is expected to be in a league of this size. A blue dot to the right indicates an unusually dominant team or an unusually weak team.
Tight: under 65% · Clear Edge: 65% to 78% · Lopsided: 78% to 88% · No Contest: 88% and up.
Close Games
Actual percentage of games decided by 3 run/points or fewer. The gold line indicates the proportion of close games you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Mostly Decisive: under 25% · Some Drama: 25% to 38% · Often Close: 38% to 50% · Nail-Biters: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Actual percentage of games decided by 15 runs/points or more. The gold line indicates the proportion of blowouts you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Rare: under 10% · Occasional: 10% to 20% · Frequent: 20% to 30% · Routine: 30% and up.
Gini Index
0.25
Concentrated
00.080.150.240.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.92
Stratified
01.003
Interquartile Edge
80%
Lopsided
50%58%65%73%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 98%
98%
No Contest
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
19%
Mostly Decisive
0%16%100%
Blowouts
Expected
33%
Routine
0%32%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame win probabilities aligned with the actual game result, averaged over the entire season. Picks that were both confident and correct are rewarded the most, while incorrect predictions and/or uncertain predictions are penalized more. Lower scores are better. 0 indicates every game was perfectly predicted with maximum confidence. For sports with where wins and losses are the only outcomes, Brier scores less than 0.25 indicate the model did better than random predictions. For sports where ties are possible, 0.67 is the cutoff for which the Brier score must be lower to beat random predictions. The lower the Brier score, the easier and more accurately the games were to predict.
Highly Predictable: under 0.18 · Predictable: 0.18 to 0.22 · Hard to Predict: 0.22 to 0.25 · Coin-Flip: 0.25 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, calculated by averaging the difference in the win probabilities divided by the sum of the win probabilities. Lower scores indicate more parity in the league. 0 indicates that every game was a 50-50 toss-up between evenly matched teams. 1 means every game pitted a heavy favorite against a huge underdog.
Evenly Matched: under 0.12 · Slight Separation: 0.12 to 0.22 · Wide Gaps: 0.22 to 0.34 · Lopsided: 0.34 and up.
Strangeness
How extreme the actual final standings were compared to what the model expected. A value of 0 would indicate that the simulated results perfectly matched the actual standings. A score of 1 indicates that the actual results were scattered around the projections by exactly the variance the model predicted. (i.e. The projections missed the actual standings by 1 standard deviation on average. Scores larger than 1 mean the season was wilder to forecast with more overperforming and underperforming teams than expected. Scores less than 1 indicate the season was more predictable.
Tighter Than Modeled: under 0.85 · As Expected: 0.85 to 1.15 · Volatile: 1.15 to 1.5 · Chaotic: 1.5 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the order of the final standings aligned with the ranked preseason Elo ratings as calculated by the Spearman rank correlation. Larger values indicate that the preseason Elo ratings were a strong predictor of the team's final rank in the standings while values near 0 mean.
Reshuffled: under 0.3 · Weak Alignment: 0.3 to 0.6 · Strong Alignment: 0.6 to 0.85 · Closely Aligned: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality. The gold line measures how often the model expected the underdog to win when considering the outcome probabilities. A blue dot to the right of the gold line means upsets were more prevalent than left. A dot to the left indicates that favorites won more often than expected.
Chalk Held: under 30% · As Expected: 30% to 40% · Upset-Prone: 40% to 46% · Bedlam: 46% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality, but only including games with a clear favorite, one at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside. This metrics ignores games that could be considered toss-ups. The gold line is how often the model expected these heavy favorites to lose. A dot to the right means the big favorites were upset more than expected; to the left means they took care of business.
Favorites Held: under 22% · As Expected: 22% to 32% · Shaky Favorites: 32% to 42% · Bedlam: 42% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.18
Highly Predictable
00.191
Matchup Imbalance
0.42
Lopsided
00.120.220.340.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.21
Volatile
01.002
Repeatability
0.87
Closely Aligned
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
27%
Chalk Held
0%29%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
18%
Favorites Held
0%23%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Games are sorted into bins according to how confident the model was. Within each bin, the predicted number of wins, losses, and ties are compared against the actual counts. The p-value of this test is plotted below. Values above 0.05 indicate that the model's probabilities are well-calibrated for the season.
Clear Misfit: under 0.01 · Misfit: 0.01 to 0.05 · Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 · Well Calibrated: 0.1 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the model's probabilities is correct. Each probability is turned into their log-odds. A line is fit that predicts the actual results from the log-odds. The slope of this line is the calibration slope.A slope of 1.00 is perfect, indicating that the model's confidence matches the actual outcomes of the games. Slopes less than 1.00 indicate overconfidence. The model assigned higher probabilities to the favorites than was appropriate given the matchup, causing more losses by favored teams. Slopes greater than 1.00 indicate under-confidence. The model is more uncertain about too many results, assigning them lower probabilities when in reality the favorites should have had higher probabilities.
Overconfident: under 0.85 · Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 · Underconfident: 1.15 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
Calibration error (ECE) checks whether the model's probabilities mean what they say. ECE is calculated as the average weighted gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted outcome actually occurred. The smaller the ECE, the more confident we are about the model's probabilities. The gold line represents the noise ceiling, which is the amount of error that luck can produce on its own even if the probabilities are perfectly calibrated. Values below the noise ceiling indicate that the model's error is no larger than chance alone would produce. Values above the noice ceiling point to a genuine calibration issue since the error is larger than luck could explain.
Well Within Noise: under 0.06 · Within Noise: 0.06 to 0.12 · Above Noise: 0.12 to 0.25 · Well Above Noise: 0.25 and up.
Probability calibration
0.74
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.11
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.15
Underconfident
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.079
Within Noise
00.1240.3

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual wins, simulated final wins, playoff probability, and division-title probability - day by day. Select a division to see all five charts for its teams.

Elo Through the Playoffs

How each playoff team's Elo rating evolved as the postseason unfolded. Elo Progression traces each team's game-by-game Elo rating through their playoff run. Net Elo Change summarizes the difference in Elo rating between the beginning and end of the playoffs for each team.

Stochastic Playoff Outcomes

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Made Playoffs Advanced to Finals Won Finals
Houston Comets 99.85% 86.03% 69.56%
Phoenix Mercury 84.28% 43.57% 11.88%
Cleveland Rockers 63.31% 30.27% 10.17%
New York Liberty 48.99% 17.96% 4.97%
Charlotte Sting 73.30% 16.50% 2.44%
Los Angeles Sparks 22.83% 4.37% 0.72%
Detroit Shock 5.72% 1.23% 0.26%
Utah Starzz 0.53% 0.03% <0.01%
Sacramento Monarchs 1.19% 0.06% <0.01%
Washington Mystics <0.01% - -
Loser →
↓ Winner
Charlotte StingCleveland RockersDetroit ShockHouston CometsLos Angeles SparksNew York LibertyPhoenix MercurySacramento MonarchsUtah StarzzWashington Mystics
Charlotte Sting24.5%12.42%43.8%0.59%6.8%21.96%52.8%2.99%32.9%8.15%27.0%27.01%86.4%0.13%80.4%0.05%
Cleveland Rockers75.5%12.42%69.5%0.40%20.8%22.68%76.7%2.22%59.8%5.85%54.0%19.66%89.8%0.06%91.3%0.02%
Detroit Shock56.2%0.59%30.5%0.40%8.8%3.45%48.3%0.09%34.5%0.23%35.6%0.95%66.7%<0.01%100.0%<0.01%
Houston Comets93.2%21.96%79.2%22.68%91.2%3.45%93.4%11.56%84.3%20.26%82.1%18.74%97.8%0.82%99.2%0.38%100.0%<0.01%
Los Angeles Sparks47.2%2.99%23.3%2.22%51.7%0.09%6.6%11.56%31.2%1.35%25.9%4.61%87.5%<0.01%100.0%<0.01%
New York Liberty67.1%8.15%40.2%5.85%65.5%0.23%15.7%20.26%68.8%1.35%44.6%13.10%88.5%0.03%85.0%0.02%
Phoenix Mercury73.0%27.01%46.0%19.66%64.4%0.95%17.9%18.74%74.1%4.61%55.4%13.10%89.2%0.15%85.7%0.06%
Sacramento Monarchs13.6%0.13%10.2%0.06%33.3%<0.01%2.2%0.82%12.5%<0.01%11.5%0.03%10.8%0.15%
Utah Starzz19.6%0.05%8.7%0.02%0.0%<0.01%0.8%0.38%0.0%<0.01%15.0%0.02%14.3%0.06%
Loser →
↓ Winner
Charlotte StingCleveland RockersDetroit ShockHouston CometsLos Angeles SparksNew York LibertyPhoenix MercurySacramento MonarchsUtah Starzz
Charlotte Sting25.9%1.49%43.5%0.06%9.8%12.50%51.7%0.15%33.1%0.87%31.2%1.42%66.7%<0.01%
Cleveland Rockers74.1%1.49%70.9%0.11%24.0%22.27%73.0%0.44%56.1%1.76%55.4%4.18%100.0%<0.01%80.0%<0.01%
Detroit Shock56.5%0.06%29.1%0.11%11.0%0.79%72.7%0.01%38.5%0.05%37.7%0.20%
Houston Comets90.2%12.50%76.0%22.27%89.0%0.79%90.6%3.00%81.5%12.62%79.3%34.77%100.0%0.04%88.9%0.02%
Los Angeles Sparks48.3%0.15%27.0%0.44%27.3%0.01%9.4%3.00%38.4%0.22%28.9%0.55%
New York Liberty66.9%0.87%43.9%1.76%61.5%0.05%18.5%12.62%61.6%0.22%45.9%2.43%100.0%<0.01%100.0%<0.01%
Phoenix Mercury68.8%1.42%44.6%4.18%62.3%0.20%20.7%34.77%71.1%0.55%54.1%2.43%100.0%0.01%
Sacramento Monarchs33.3%<0.01%0.0%<0.01%0.0%0.04%0.0%<0.01%0.0%0.01%
Utah Starzz20.0%<0.01%11.1%0.02%0.0%<0.01%

Actual Bracket Simulation

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Advanced to Finals Won Finals Actual Outcome
Houston Comets 93.12% 70.83% Won Finals
Charlotte Sting 6.88% 2.05% Eliminated in Finals
Loser →
↓ Winner
Charlotte StingCleveland RockersHouston CometsPhoenix Mercury
Charlotte Sting6.9%100.00%
Cleveland Rockers59.2%100.00%
Houston Comets93.1%100.00%
Phoenix Mercury40.8%100.00%
Loser →
↓ Winner
Charlotte StingCleveland RockersHouston CometsPhoenix Mercury
Charlotte Sting28.5%4.04%31.6%2.84%
Cleveland Rockers71.5%4.04%24.4%55.16%
Houston Comets75.6%55.16%76.7%37.97%
Phoenix Mercury68.4%2.84%23.3%37.97%

Most-Likely Championship Paths

For each playoff team, what was the most likely path they had to the championship across all simulations? Tiles represent the opponent they faced and defeated the most often in each round.

Houston Comets 70.83% chance to win
Semifinals
vs. Charlotte Sting
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
93.12%
Finals
vs. Cleveland Rockers
Matchup
58.89%
Win Prob
75.63%
Cleveland Rockers 16.33% chance to win
Semifinals
vs. Phoenix Mercury
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
59.19%
Finals
vs. Houston Comets
Matchup
82.33%
Win Prob
24.37%
Phoenix Mercury 10.79% chance to win
Semifinals
vs. Cleveland Rockers
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
40.81%
Finals
vs. Houston Comets
Matchup
81.97%
Win Prob
23.30%
Charlotte Sting 2.05% chance to win
Semifinals
vs. Houston Comets
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
6.88%
Finals
vs. Cleveland Rockers
Matchup
56.18%
Win Prob
28.50%

Regular Season Games

Summary of every regular-season game played this season.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1998-06-11 Washington Mystics W 83-57 1541.20 1350.00 81.85% 18.15% +15.03 1-0
1998-06-13 @ Detroit Shock W 78-69 1556.23 1350.00 68.60% 31.40% +15.28 2-0
1998-06-15 Houston Comets L 65-79 1571.51 1627.60 52.06% 47.94% -31.61 2-1
1998-06-18 Detroit Shock W 71-67 1539.90 1320.11 84.17% 15.83% +5.13 3-1
1998-06-21 @ Phoenix Mercury W 72-71 1545.03 1600.23 32.67% 67.33% +10.93 4-1
1998-06-24 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 77-73 1555.96 1521.67 44.82% 55.18% +17.91 5-1
1998-06-25 @ Utah Starzz W 91-83 1573.87 1403.08 64.05% 35.95% +16.51 6-1
1998-06-27 Sacramento Monarchs W 58-50 1590.38 1398.10 81.94% 18.06% +8.29 7-1
1998-06-29 @ Detroit Shock L 49-60 1598.67 1425.99 64.30% 35.70% -34.62 7-2
1998-07-04 Phoenix Mercury W 68-66 1564.05 1650.18 47.74% 52.26% +12.00 8-2
1998-07-07 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 79-86 1576.05 1469.75 55.14% 44.86% -23.68 8-3
1998-07-08 @ Utah Starzz W 77-69 1552.37 1382.51 63.93% 36.07% +16.56 9-3
1998-07-10 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 63-55 1568.93 1419.83 61.13% 38.87% +17.84 10-3
1998-07-12 @ New York Liberty W 75-57 1586.77 1527.33 48.42% 51.58% +35.52 11-3
1998-07-15 New York Liberty W 72-65 1622.29 1491.81 76.07% 23.93% +10.27 12-3
1998-07-17 Washington Mystics W 86-56 1632.56 1301.08 91.00% 9.00% +8.00 13-3
1998-07-19 @ Cleveland Rockers L 69-85 1640.56 1462.92 64.96% 35.04% -42.17 13-4
1998-07-21 @ Washington Mystics W 84-67 1598.39 1263.19 82.11% 17.89% +11.97 14-4
1998-07-22 Utah Starzz L 58-61 1610.36 1354.87 86.72% 13.28% -24.37 14-5
1998-07-25 Houston Comets L 58-67 1585.99 1818.07 28.28% 71.72% -13.77 14-6
1998-07-27 Sacramento Monarchs L 70-76 1572.22 1359.72 83.60% 16.40% -33.24 14-7
1998-07-30 Cleveland Rockers W 79-64 1538.98 1548.82 58.63% 41.37% +26.00 15-7
1998-08-02 @ New York Liberty L 67-85 1564.98 1588.05 36.86% 63.14% -25.38 15-8
1998-08-03 Detroit Shock W 71-68 1539.60 1475.58 68.44% 31.56% +8.87 16-8
1998-08-05 New York Liberty W 69-61 1548.47 1613.43 50.79% 49.21% +22.60 17-8
1998-08-08 @ Cleveland Rockers L 58-65 1571.07 1585.00 38.09% 61.91% -16.36 17-9
1998-08-10 @ Houston Comets L 67-70 1554.71 1840.93 11.37% 88.63% -3.20 17-10
1998-08-12 Los Angeles Sparks L 52-65 1551.51 1453.21 72.54% 27.46% -42.45 17-11
1998-08-14 Cleveland Rockers L 72-85 1509.06 1595.38 47.72% 52.28% -27.92 17-12
1998-08-19 @ Washington Mystics W 105-69 1481.14 1159.44 80.94% 19.06% +18.56 18-12
1998-06-11 New York Liberty W 78-71 1559.81 1556.75 60.42% 39.58% +17.00 1-0
1998-06-15 @ Detroit Shock W 96-85 1576.81 1334.71 72.87% 27.13% +14.60 2-0
1998-06-18 @ Houston Comets L 69-87 1591.41 1659.22 31.09% 68.91% -21.41 2-1
1998-06-20 Detroit Shock W 68-66 1570.00 1314.97 86.69% 13.31% +3.06 3-1
1998-06-22 Utah Starzz W 88-72 1573.06 1416.94 78.65% 21.35% +13.85 4-1
1998-06-23 @ New York Liberty L 57-59 1586.91 1530.04 48.05% 51.95% -11.02 4-2
1998-06-27 Detroit Shock L 73-84 1575.89 1381.80 82.09% 17.91% -44.19 4-3
1998-07-01 @ Washington Mystics W 92-80 1531.70 1280.59 73.88% 26.12% +14.68 5-3
1998-07-02 Phoenix Mercury L 61-76 1546.38 1618.94 49.69% 50.31% -31.24 5-4
1998-07-06 Houston Comets L 64-78 1515.14 1728.35 30.54% 69.46% -18.54 5-5
1998-07-08 Washington Mystics W 77-65 1496.60 1254.08 85.83% 14.17% +7.96 6-5
1998-07-10 @ Phoenix Mercury L 60-76 1504.56 1647.08 22.69% 77.31% -14.73 6-6
1998-07-12 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 66-87 1489.83 1467.03 43.19% 56.81% -32.12 6-7
1998-07-14 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 61-58 1457.71 1401.98 47.88% 52.12% +14.65 7-7
1998-07-16 New York Liberty W 60-51 1472.36 1481.53 58.73% 41.27% +20.10 8-7
1998-07-18 @ Detroit Shock L 57-72 1492.46 1442.96 46.99% 53.01% -29.54 8-8
1998-07-19 Charlotte Sting W 85-69 1462.92 1640.56 35.04% 64.96% +42.17 9-8
1998-07-25 Utah Starzz W 69-59 1505.09 1379.24 75.58% 24.42% +12.53 10-8
1998-07-27 Los Angeles Sparks W 83-67 1517.62 1458.97 67.77% 32.23% +20.93 11-8
1998-07-29 Sacramento Monarchs W 75-67 1538.55 1392.96 77.62% 22.38% +10.27 12-8
1998-07-30 @ Charlotte Sting L 64-79 1548.82 1538.98 41.37% 58.63% -26.00 12-9
1998-08-01 @ Houston Comets W 74-71 1522.82 1843.23 9.54% 90.46% +25.43 13-9
1998-08-04 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 72-60 1548.25 1374.67 64.42% 35.58% +20.00 14-9
1998-08-06 @ Utah Starzz W 79-69 1568.25 1371.80 67.38% 32.62% +16.75 15-9
1998-08-08 Charlotte Sting W 65-58 1585.00 1571.07 61.91% 38.09% +16.35 16-9
1998-08-10 Phoenix Mercury L 80-82 1601.35 1554.47 66.27% 33.73% -15.21 16-10
1998-08-12 @ Washington Mystics W 75-55 1586.14 1181.26 87.27% 12.73% +9.24 17-10
1998-08-14 @ Charlotte Sting W 85-72 1595.38 1509.06 52.28% 47.72% +27.92 18-10
1998-08-15 Washington Mystics W 90-71 1623.30 1166.76 95.41% 4.59% +3.25 19-10
1998-08-17 @ New York Liberty W 70-64 1626.55 1666.37 34.64% 65.36% +25.98 20-10
1998-06-13 Charlotte Sting L 69-78 1350.00 1556.23 31.40% 68.60% -15.29 0-1
1998-06-15 Cleveland Rockers L 85-96 1334.71 1576.81 27.13% 72.87% -14.60 0-2
1998-06-18 @ Charlotte Sting L 67-71 1320.11 1539.90 15.83% 84.17% -5.14 0-3
1998-06-20 @ Cleveland Rockers L 66-68 1314.97 1570.00 13.31% 86.69% -3.06 0-4
1998-06-21 @ Washington Mystics W 70-57 1311.91 1350.84 34.76% 65.24% +38.18 1-4
1998-06-23 Sacramento Monarchs W 61-57 1350.09 1429.41 48.72% 51.28% +16.65 2-4
1998-06-25 Washington Mystics W 79-71 1366.74 1312.67 67.19% 32.81% +15.06 3-4
1998-06-27 @ Cleveland Rockers W 84-73 1381.80 1575.89 17.91% 82.09% +44.19 4-4
1998-06-29 Charlotte Sting W 60-49 1425.99 1598.67 35.70% 64.30% +34.61 5-4
1998-07-01 New York Liberty W 82-65 1460.60 1570.08 44.41% 55.59% +37.21 6-4
1998-07-06 @ New York Liberty L 56-59 1497.81 1544.70 33.73% 66.27% -9.49 6-5
1998-07-08 Phoenix Mercury L 76-78 1488.32 1638.18 38.77% 61.23% -8.89 6-6
1998-07-09 @ Houston Comets L 66-96 1479.43 1773.75 10.91% 89.09% -9.70 6-7
1998-07-11 @ Washington Mystics L 53-78 1469.73 1246.12 70.72% 29.28% -57.39 6-8
1998-07-13 @ Utah Starzz W 74-67 1412.34 1364.10 46.81% 53.19% +22.84 7-8
1998-07-15 @ Phoenix Mercury L 60-73 1435.18 1672.45 14.54% 85.46% -8.51 7-9
1998-07-17 Utah Starzz W 79-67 1426.67 1341.26 71.04% 28.96% +16.29 8-9
1998-07-18 Cleveland Rockers W 72-57 1442.96 1492.46 53.01% 46.99% +29.53 9-9
1998-07-22 Washington Mystics W 76-61 1472.49 1251.22 84.28% 15.72% +9.88 10-9
1998-07-25 Los Angeles Sparks W 69-67 1482.37 1467.69 62.01% 37.99% +8.72 11-9
1998-07-26 @ New York Liberty L 62-78 1491.09 1559.18 31.06% 68.94% -20.16 11-10
1998-07-31 Sacramento Monarchs W 78-77 1470.93 1382.68 71.37% 28.63% +4.65 12-10
1998-08-03 @ Charlotte Sting L 68-71 1475.58 1539.60 31.56% 68.44% -8.87 12-11
1998-08-05 Los Angeles Sparks W 73-61 1466.71 1516.70 52.94% 47.06% +26.45 13-11
1998-08-07 Houston Comets L 57-61 1493.16 1835.31 17.31% 82.69% -5.61 13-12
1998-08-10 @ Utah Starzz W 77-73 1487.55 1347.88 59.83% 40.17% +13.04 14-12
1998-08-11 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 50-41 1500.59 1369.07 58.70% 41.30% +20.10 15-12
1998-08-14 @ Phoenix Mercury L 59-84 1520.69 1564.06 34.18% 65.82% -27.74 15-13
1998-08-16 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 77-76 1492.95 1512.37 37.35% 62.65% +10.17 16-13
1998-08-19 New York Liberty W 82-68 1503.12 1640.39 40.50% 59.50% +36.13 17-13
1998-06-13 New York Liberty W 73-62 1611.10 1539.75 69.34% 30.66% +16.50 1-0
1998-06-15 @ Charlotte Sting W 79-65 1627.60 1571.51 47.94% 52.06% +31.62 2-0
1998-06-18 Cleveland Rockers W 87-69 1659.22 1591.41 68.91% 31.09% +21.41 3-0
1998-06-20 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 79-68 1680.63 1444.38 72.20% 27.80% +14.96 4-0
1998-06-21 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 79-63 1695.59 1546.94 61.07% 38.93% +25.27 5-0
1998-06-24 @ Phoenix Mercury L 66-69 1720.86 1589.30 58.71% 41.29% -16.50 5-1
1998-06-27 Los Angeles Sparks W 75-64 1704.36 1503.76 82.64% 17.36% +9.35 6-1
1998-06-29 Washington Mystics W 73-48 1713.71 1284.93 94.65% 5.35% +4.34 7-1
1998-06-30 @ Utah Starzz W 75-73 1718.05 1371.77 83.03% 16.97% +3.89 8-1
1998-07-03 Sacramento Monarchs W 84-67 1721.94 1402.41 90.42% 9.58% +6.41 9-1
1998-07-06 @ Cleveland Rockers W 78-64 1728.35 1515.14 69.46% 30.54% +18.55 10-1
1998-07-08 @ New York Liberty W 79-54 1746.90 1554.19 66.90% 33.10% +26.85 11-1
1998-07-09 Detroit Shock W 96-66 1773.75 1479.43 89.09% 10.91% +9.70 12-1
1998-07-11 Utah Starzz W 72-68 1783.45 1365.95 94.32% 5.68% +1.85 13-1
1998-07-13 Washington Mystics W 81-67 1785.30 1303.50 96.00% 4.00% +2.43 14-1
1998-07-17 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 74-68 1787.73 1498.37 77.91% 22.09% +8.78 15-1
1998-07-18 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 75-44 1796.51 1377.49 88.15% 11.85% +10.71 16-1
1998-07-21 @ Phoenix Mercury W 65-62 1807.22 1656.20 61.39% 38.61% +10.85 17-1
1998-07-25 @ Charlotte Sting W 67-58 1818.07 1585.99 71.72% 28.28% +13.77 18-1
1998-07-28 Phoenix Mercury W 72-62 1831.84 1591.38 85.69% 14.31% +7.35 19-1
1998-07-30 Utah Starzz W 88-65 1839.19 1405.31 94.80% 5.20% +4.04 20-1
1998-08-01 Cleveland Rockers L 71-74 1843.23 1522.82 90.46% 9.54% -25.43 20-2
1998-08-02 Sacramento Monarchs W 70-53 1817.80 1378.04 94.96% 5.04% +3.37 21-2
1998-08-04 @ Utah Starzz W 77-57 1821.17 1379.46 89.45% 10.55% +7.66 22-2
1998-08-06 Phoenix Mercury W 75-64 1828.83 1553.77 87.96% 12.04% +6.48 23-2
1998-08-07 @ Detroit Shock W 61-57 1835.31 1493.16 82.69% 17.31% +5.62 24-2
1998-08-10 Charlotte Sting W 70-67 1840.93 1554.71 88.63% 11.37% +3.20 25-2
1998-08-15 @ New York Liberty L 54-70 1844.13 1620.45 70.73% 29.27% -45.92 25-3
1998-08-17 @ Washington Mystics W 110-65 1798.21 1163.51 96.26% 3.74% +4.07 26-3
1998-08-19 Los Angeles Sparks W 80-71 1802.28 1502.20 89.41% 10.59% +5.16 27-3
1998-06-11 @ Utah Starzz W 89-83 1556.40 1438.06 56.85% 43.15% +17.15 1-0
1998-06-14 @ Phoenix Mercury L 60-70 1573.55 1571.47 40.29% 59.71% -20.67 1-1
1998-06-16 @ Sacramento Monarchs L 69-73 1552.88 1465.21 52.48% 47.52% -17.04 1-2
1998-06-19 New York Liberty W 78-75 1535.84 1532.10 60.52% 39.48% +11.10 2-2
1998-06-21 Houston Comets L 63-79 1546.94 1695.59 38.93% 61.07% -25.27 2-3
1998-06-24 Charlotte Sting L 73-77 1521.67 1555.96 55.18% 44.82% -17.91 2-4
1998-06-27 @ Houston Comets L 64-75 1503.76 1704.36 17.36% 82.64% -9.35 2-5
1998-06-30 @ Sacramento Monarchs L 56-58 1494.41 1389.81 54.90% 45.10% -12.60 2-6
1998-07-02 Utah Starzz L 57-58 1481.81 1367.88 74.29% 25.71% -12.06 2-7
1998-07-07 Charlotte Sting W 86-79 1469.75 1576.05 44.86% 55.14% +23.68 3-7
1998-07-08 Sacramento Monarchs L 71-76 1493.43 1393.43 72.73% 27.27% -26.40 3-8
1998-07-12 Cleveland Rockers W 87-66 1467.03 1489.83 56.81% 43.19% +32.12 4-8
1998-07-13 @ Phoenix Mercury L 62-72 1499.15 1661.81 20.72% 79.28% -10.63 4-9
1998-07-15 Sacramento Monarchs W 81-76 1488.52 1387.33 72.87% 27.13% +9.85 5-9
1998-07-17 Houston Comets L 68-74 1498.37 1787.73 22.09% 77.91% -8.79 5-10
1998-07-21 New York Liberty L 77-92 1489.58 1494.89 59.26% 40.74% -37.25 5-11
1998-07-23 Phoenix Mercury W 70-68 1452.33 1645.35 33.06% 66.94% +15.36 6-11
1998-07-25 @ Detroit Shock L 67-69 1467.69 1482.37 37.99% 62.01% -8.72 6-12
1998-07-27 @ Cleveland Rockers L 67-83 1458.97 1517.62 32.23% 67.77% -20.92 6-13
1998-07-29 @ Washington Mystics W 77-68 1438.05 1212.66 70.93% 29.07% +14.15 7-13
1998-07-31 Phoenix Mercury W 71-56 1452.20 1584.03 41.26% 58.74% +36.93 8-13
1998-08-01 @ Utah Starzz W 73-65 1489.13 1401.27 52.51% 47.49% +21.80 9-13
1998-08-03 Washington Mystics W 86-72 1510.93 1189.79 90.50% 9.50% +5.77 10-13
1998-08-05 @ Detroit Shock L 61-73 1516.70 1466.71 47.06% 52.94% -26.46 10-14
1998-08-08 @ New York Liberty L 62-80 1490.24 1590.84 27.20% 72.80% -18.73 10-15
1998-08-09 @ Washington Mystics L 74-76 1471.51 1162.96 79.75% 20.25% -18.30 10-16
1998-08-12 @ Charlotte Sting W 65-52 1453.21 1551.51 27.46% 72.54% +42.45 11-16
1998-08-14 Utah Starzz W 87-67 1495.66 1356.38 76.98% 23.02% +16.71 12-16
1998-08-16 Detroit Shock L 76-77 1512.37 1492.95 62.65% 37.35% -10.17 12-17
1998-08-19 @ Houston Comets L 71-80 1502.20 1802.28 10.59% 89.41% -5.16 12-18
1998-06-11 @ Cleveland Rockers L 71-78 1556.75 1559.81 39.58% 60.42% -17.00 0-1
1998-06-13 @ Houston Comets L 62-73 1539.75 1611.10 30.66% 69.34% -16.50 0-2
1998-06-15 @ Utah Starzz L 60-71 1523.25 1425.59 53.91% 46.09% -29.02 0-3
1998-06-18 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 64-48 1494.23 1482.25 41.67% 58.33% +37.87 1-3
1998-06-19 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 75-78 1532.10 1535.84 39.48% 60.52% -11.10 1-4
1998-06-21 Utah Starzz W 68-64 1521.00 1425.97 72.16% 27.84% +9.04 2-4
1998-06-23 Cleveland Rockers W 59-57 1530.04 1586.91 51.95% 48.05% +11.03 3-4
1998-06-26 Sacramento Monarchs W 62-48 1541.07 1412.77 75.84% 24.16% +14.67 4-4
1998-06-29 Phoenix Mercury W 71-68 1555.74 1633.28 48.98% 51.02% +14.34 5-4
1998-07-01 @ Detroit Shock L 65-82 1570.08 1460.60 55.59% 44.41% -37.20 5-5
1998-07-03 Washington Mystics W 76-60 1532.88 1265.91 87.46% 12.54% +8.14 6-5
1998-07-05 @ Washington Mystics W 62-61 1541.02 1257.77 77.30% 22.70% +3.68 7-5
1998-07-06 Detroit Shock W 59-56 1544.70 1497.81 66.27% 33.73% +9.49 8-5
1998-07-08 Houston Comets L 54-79 1554.19 1746.90 33.10% 66.90% -26.86 8-6
1998-07-12 Charlotte Sting L 57-75 1527.33 1586.77 51.58% 48.42% -35.52 8-7
1998-07-15 @ Charlotte Sting L 65-72 1491.81 1622.29 23.93% 76.07% -10.28 8-8
1998-07-16 @ Cleveland Rockers L 51-60 1481.53 1472.36 41.27% 58.73% -20.09 8-9
1998-07-18 @ Phoenix Mercury W 69-63 1461.44 1680.95 15.85% 84.15% +33.45 9-9
1998-07-21 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 92-77 1494.89 1489.58 40.74% 59.26% +37.25 10-9
1998-07-24 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 76-54 1532.14 1358.08 64.49% 35.51% +27.04 11-9
1998-07-26 Detroit Shock W 78-62 1559.18 1491.09 68.94% 31.06% +20.16 12-9
1998-08-01 @ Washington Mystics W 67-53 1579.34 1198.50 85.65% 14.35% +8.71 13-9
1998-08-02 Charlotte Sting W 85-67 1588.05 1564.98 63.14% 36.86% +25.38 14-9
1998-08-05 @ Charlotte Sting L 61-69 1613.43 1548.47 49.21% 50.79% -22.59 14-10
1998-08-08 Los Angeles Sparks W 80-62 1590.84 1490.24 72.80% 27.20% +18.73 15-10
1998-08-11 Phoenix Mercury W 79-78 1609.57 1569.68 65.37% 34.63% +5.62 16-10
1998-08-13 Washington Mystics W 88-45 1615.19 1172.02 95.06% 4.94% +5.26 17-10
1998-08-15 Houston Comets W 70-54 1620.45 1844.13 29.27% 70.73% +45.92 18-10
1998-08-17 Cleveland Rockers L 64-70 1666.37 1626.55 65.36% 34.64% -25.98 18-11
1998-08-19 @ Detroit Shock L 68-82 1640.39 1503.12 59.50% 40.50% -36.14 18-12
1998-06-11 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 73-70 1557.75 1478.93 51.21% 48.79% +13.72 1-0
1998-06-14 Los Angeles Sparks W 70-60 1571.47 1573.55 59.71% 40.29% +20.67 2-0
1998-06-15 Washington Mystics W 69-54 1592.14 1330.29 87.13% 12.87% +8.09 3-0
1998-06-21 Charlotte Sting L 71-72 1600.23 1545.03 67.33% 32.67% -10.93 3-1
1998-06-24 Houston Comets W 69-66 1589.30 1720.86 41.29% 58.71% +16.51 4-1
1998-06-26 Utah Starzz W 96-63 1605.81 1386.58 84.12% 15.88% +14.80 5-1
1998-06-28 @ Washington Mystics W 86-69 1620.61 1297.60 81.06% 18.94% +12.67 6-1
1998-06-29 @ New York Liberty L 68-71 1633.28 1555.74 51.02% 48.98% -14.34 6-2
1998-07-02 @ Cleveland Rockers W 76-61 1618.94 1546.38 50.31% 49.69% +31.24 7-2
1998-07-04 @ Charlotte Sting L 66-68 1650.18 1564.05 52.26% 47.74% -12.00 7-3
1998-07-08 @ Detroit Shock W 78-76 1638.18 1488.32 61.23% 38.77% +8.90 8-3
1998-07-10 Cleveland Rockers W 76-60 1647.08 1504.56 77.31% 22.69% +14.73 9-3
1998-07-13 Los Angeles Sparks W 72-62 1661.81 1499.15 79.28% 20.72% +10.64 10-3
1998-07-15 Detroit Shock W 73-60 1672.45 1435.18 85.46% 14.54% +8.50 11-3
1998-07-18 New York Liberty L 63-69 1680.95 1461.44 84.15% 15.85% -33.45 11-4
1998-07-20 Sacramento Monarchs W 88-67 1647.50 1366.78 88.30% 11.70% +8.70 12-4
1998-07-21 Houston Comets L 62-65 1656.20 1807.22 38.61% 61.39% -10.85 12-5
1998-07-23 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 68-70 1645.35 1452.33 66.94% 33.06% -15.37 12-6
1998-07-27 @ Utah Starzz L 80-90 1629.98 1366.71 75.21% 24.79% -38.60 12-7
1998-07-28 @ Houston Comets L 62-72 1591.38 1831.84 14.31% 85.69% -7.35 12-8
1998-07-31 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 56-71 1584.03 1452.20 58.74% 41.26% -36.92 12-9
1998-08-04 Washington Mystics W 88-59 1547.11 1184.02 92.38% 7.62% +6.66 13-9
1998-08-06 @ Houston Comets L 64-75 1553.77 1828.83 12.04% 87.96% -6.48 13-10
1998-08-08 Utah Starzz W 68-62 1547.29 1355.06 81.94% 18.06% +7.18 14-10
1998-08-10 @ Cleveland Rockers W 82-80 1554.47 1601.35 33.73% 66.27% +15.21 15-10
1998-08-11 @ New York Liberty L 78-79 1569.68 1609.57 34.63% 65.37% -5.62 15-11
1998-08-14 Detroit Shock W 84-59 1564.06 1520.69 65.82% 34.18% +27.74 16-11
1998-08-16 @ Sacramento Monarchs W 85-69 1591.80 1362.59 71.38% 28.62% +18.58 17-11
1998-08-17 @ Utah Starzz W 75-64 1610.38 1304.50 79.50% 20.50% +11.03 18-11
1998-08-19 Sacramento Monarchs W 71-62 1621.41 1344.01 88.10% 11.90% +5.80 19-11
1998-06-11 Phoenix Mercury L 70-73 1478.93 1557.75 48.79% 51.21% -13.72 0-1
1998-06-16 Los Angeles Sparks W 73-69 1465.21 1552.88 47.52% 52.48% +17.04 1-1
1998-06-18 New York Liberty L 48-64 1482.25 1494.23 58.33% 41.67% -37.87 1-2
1998-06-20 Houston Comets L 68-79 1444.38 1680.63 27.80% 72.20% -14.97 1-3
1998-06-23 @ Detroit Shock L 57-61 1429.41 1350.09 51.28% 48.72% -16.64 1-4
1998-06-26 @ New York Liberty L 48-62 1412.77 1541.07 24.16% 75.84% -14.67 1-5
1998-06-27 @ Charlotte Sting L 50-58 1398.10 1590.38 18.06% 81.94% -8.29 1-6
1998-06-30 Los Angeles Sparks W 58-56 1389.81 1494.41 45.10% 54.90% +12.60 2-6
1998-07-03 @ Houston Comets L 67-84 1402.41 1721.94 9.58% 90.42% -6.41 2-7
1998-07-05 Utah Starzz W 70-66 1396.00 1379.94 62.20% 37.80% +12.27 3-7
1998-07-06 @ Utah Starzz L 64-68 1408.27 1367.67 45.72% 54.28% -14.84 3-8
1998-07-08 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 76-71 1393.43 1493.43 27.27% 72.73% +26.40 4-8
1998-07-10 Charlotte Sting L 55-63 1419.83 1568.93 38.87% 61.13% -17.85 4-9
1998-07-14 Cleveland Rockers L 58-61 1401.98 1457.71 52.12% 47.88% -14.65 4-10
1998-07-15 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 76-81 1387.33 1488.52 27.13% 72.87% -9.84 4-11
1998-07-18 Houston Comets L 44-75 1377.49 1796.51 11.85% 88.15% -10.71 4-12
1998-07-20 @ Phoenix Mercury L 67-88 1366.78 1647.50 11.70% 88.30% -8.70 4-13
1998-07-24 New York Liberty L 54-76 1358.08 1532.14 35.51% 64.49% -27.04 4-14
1998-07-26 @ Washington Mystics W 79-65 1331.04 1241.34 52.77% 47.23% +28.68 5-14
1998-07-27 @ Charlotte Sting W 76-70 1359.72 1572.22 16.40% 83.60% +33.24 6-14
1998-07-29 @ Cleveland Rockers L 67-75 1392.96 1538.55 22.38% 77.62% -10.28 6-15
1998-07-31 @ Detroit Shock L 77-78 1382.68 1470.93 28.63% 71.37% -4.64 6-16
1998-08-02 @ Houston Comets L 53-70 1378.04 1817.80 5.04% 94.96% -3.37 6-17
1998-08-04 Cleveland Rockers L 60-72 1374.67 1548.25 35.58% 64.42% -20.00 6-18
1998-08-07 Washington Mystics W 76-55 1354.67 1177.36 80.63% 19.37% +14.40 7-18
1998-08-11 Detroit Shock L 41-50 1369.07 1500.59 41.30% 58.70% -20.11 7-19
1998-08-12 @ Utah Starzz L 71-81 1348.96 1334.84 41.97% 58.03% -21.53 7-20
1998-08-15 Utah Starzz W 82-55 1327.43 1339.67 58.30% 41.70% +35.16 8-20
1998-08-16 Phoenix Mercury L 69-85 1362.59 1591.80 28.62% 71.38% -18.58 8-21
1998-08-19 @ Phoenix Mercury L 62-71 1344.01 1621.41 11.90% 88.10% -5.79 8-22
1998-06-11 Los Angeles Sparks L 83-89 1438.06 1556.40 43.15% 56.85% -17.16 0-1
1998-06-13 Washington Mystics W 78-77 1420.90 1334.98 71.10% 28.90% +4.69 1-1
1998-06-15 New York Liberty W 71-60 1425.59 1523.25 46.09% 53.91% +29.02 2-1
1998-06-19 @ Washington Mystics L 76-85 1454.61 1322.20 58.83% 41.17% -28.64 2-2
1998-06-21 @ New York Liberty L 64-68 1425.97 1521.00 27.84% 72.16% -9.03 2-3
1998-06-22 @ Cleveland Rockers L 72-88 1416.94 1573.06 21.35% 78.65% -13.86 2-4
1998-06-25 Charlotte Sting L 83-91 1403.08 1573.87 35.95% 64.05% -16.50 2-5
1998-06-26 @ Phoenix Mercury L 63-96 1386.58 1605.81 15.88% 84.12% -14.81 2-6
1998-06-30 Houston Comets L 73-75 1371.77 1718.05 16.97% 83.03% -3.89 2-7
1998-07-02 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 58-57 1367.88 1481.81 25.71% 74.29% +12.06 3-7
1998-07-05 @ Sacramento Monarchs L 66-70 1379.94 1396.00 37.80% 62.20% -12.27 3-8
1998-07-06 Sacramento Monarchs W 68-64 1367.67 1408.27 54.28% 45.72% +14.84 4-8
1998-07-08 Charlotte Sting L 69-77 1382.51 1552.37 36.07% 63.93% -16.56 4-9
1998-07-11 @ Houston Comets L 68-72 1365.95 1783.45 5.68% 94.32% -1.85 4-10
1998-07-13 Detroit Shock L 67-74 1364.10 1412.34 53.19% 46.81% -22.84 4-11
1998-07-17 @ Detroit Shock L 67-79 1341.26 1426.67 28.96% 71.04% -16.28 4-12
1998-07-19 @ Washington Mystics W 99-88 1324.98 1293.08 44.48% 55.52% +29.89 5-12
1998-07-22 @ Charlotte Sting W 61-58 1354.87 1610.36 13.28% 86.72% +24.37 6-12
1998-07-25 @ Cleveland Rockers L 59-69 1379.24 1505.09 24.42% 75.58% -12.53 6-13
1998-07-27 Phoenix Mercury W 90-80 1366.71 1629.98 24.79% 75.21% +38.60 7-13
1998-07-30 @ Houston Comets L 65-88 1405.31 1839.19 5.20% 94.80% -4.04 7-14
1998-08-01 Los Angeles Sparks L 65-73 1401.27 1489.13 47.49% 52.51% -21.81 7-15
1998-08-04 Houston Comets L 57-77 1379.46 1821.17 10.55% 89.45% -7.66 7-16
1998-08-06 Cleveland Rockers L 69-79 1371.80 1568.25 32.62% 67.38% -16.74 7-17
1998-08-08 @ Phoenix Mercury L 62-68 1355.06 1547.29 18.06% 81.94% -7.18 7-18
1998-08-10 Detroit Shock L 73-77 1347.88 1487.55 40.17% 59.83% -13.04 7-19
1998-08-12 Sacramento Monarchs W 81-71 1334.84 1348.96 58.03% 41.97% +21.54 8-19
1998-08-14 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 67-87 1356.38 1495.66 23.02% 76.98% -16.71 8-20
1998-08-15 @ Sacramento Monarchs L 55-82 1339.67 1327.43 41.70% 58.30% -35.17 8-21
1998-08-17 Phoenix Mercury L 64-75 1304.50 1610.38 20.50% 79.50% -11.03 8-22
1998-06-11 @ Charlotte Sting L 57-83 1350.00 1541.20 18.15% 81.85% -15.02 0-1
1998-06-13 @ Utah Starzz L 77-78 1334.98 1420.90 28.90% 71.10% -4.69 0-2
1998-06-15 @ Phoenix Mercury L 54-69 1330.29 1592.14 12.87% 87.13% -8.09 0-3
1998-06-19 Utah Starzz W 85-76 1322.20 1454.61 41.17% 58.83% +28.64 1-3
1998-06-21 Detroit Shock L 57-70 1350.84 1311.91 65.24% 34.76% -38.17 1-4
1998-06-25 @ Detroit Shock L 71-79 1312.67 1366.74 32.81% 67.19% -15.07 1-5
1998-06-28 Phoenix Mercury L 69-86 1297.60 1620.61 18.94% 81.06% -12.67 1-6
1998-06-29 @ Houston Comets L 48-73 1284.93 1713.71 5.35% 94.65% -4.34 1-7
1998-07-01 Cleveland Rockers L 80-92 1280.59 1531.70 26.12% 73.88% -14.68 1-8
1998-07-03 @ New York Liberty L 60-76 1265.91 1532.88 12.54% 87.46% -8.14 1-9
1998-07-05 New York Liberty L 61-62 1257.77 1541.02 22.70% 77.30% -3.69 1-10
1998-07-08 @ Cleveland Rockers L 65-77 1254.08 1496.60 14.17% 85.83% -7.96 1-11
1998-07-11 Detroit Shock W 78-53 1246.12 1469.73 29.28% 70.72% +57.38 2-11
1998-07-13 @ Houston Comets L 67-81 1303.50 1785.30 4.00% 96.00% -2.42 2-12
1998-07-17 @ Charlotte Sting L 56-86 1301.08 1632.56 9.00% 91.00% -8.00 2-13
1998-07-19 Utah Starzz L 88-99 1293.08 1324.98 55.52% 44.48% -29.89 2-14
1998-07-21 Charlotte Sting L 67-84 1263.19 1598.39 17.89% 82.11% -11.97 2-15
1998-07-22 @ Detroit Shock L 61-76 1251.22 1472.49 15.72% 84.28% -9.88 2-16
1998-07-26 Sacramento Monarchs L 65-79 1241.34 1331.04 47.23% 52.77% -28.68 2-17
1998-07-29 Los Angeles Sparks L 68-77 1212.66 1438.05 29.07% 70.93% -14.16 2-18
1998-08-01 New York Liberty L 53-67 1198.50 1579.34 14.35% 85.65% -8.71 2-19
1998-08-03 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 72-86 1189.79 1510.93 9.50% 90.50% -5.77 2-20
1998-08-04 @ Phoenix Mercury L 59-88 1184.02 1547.11 7.62% 92.38% -6.66 2-21
1998-08-07 @ Sacramento Monarchs L 55-76 1177.36 1354.67 19.37% 80.63% -14.40 2-22
1998-08-09 Los Angeles Sparks W 76-74 1162.96 1471.51 20.25% 79.75% +18.30 3-22
1998-08-12 Cleveland Rockers L 55-75 1181.26 1586.14 12.73% 87.27% -9.24 3-23
1998-08-13 @ New York Liberty L 45-88 1172.02 1615.19 4.94% 95.06% -5.26 3-24
1998-08-15 @ Cleveland Rockers L 71-90 1166.76 1623.30 4.59% 95.41% -3.25 3-25
1998-08-17 Houston Comets L 65-110 1163.51 1798.21 3.74% 96.26% -4.07 3-26
1998-08-19 Charlotte Sting L 69-105 1159.44 1481.14 19.06% 80.94% -18.55 3-27

Playoff Games

Every playoff game from the selected team's perspective.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1998-08-22 Houston Comets L 71-85 1499.70 1807.44 20.33% 79.67% -12.35 0-1
1998-08-24 @ Houston Comets L 61-77 1487.35 1819.79 8.96% 91.04% -5.81 0-2
1998-08-22 @ Phoenix Mercury L 68-78 1652.53 1627.21 43.54% 56.46% -22.34 0-1
1998-08-24 Phoenix Mercury W 67-66 1630.19 1649.55 57.30% 42.70% +6.93 1-1
1998-08-25 Phoenix Mercury L 60-71 1637.12 1642.62 59.24% 40.76% -31.89 1-2
1998-08-22 @ Charlotte Sting W 85-71 1807.44 1499.70 79.67% 20.33% +12.35 1-0
1998-08-24 Charlotte Sting W 77-61 1819.79 1487.35 91.04% 8.96% +5.81 2-0
1998-08-27 @ Phoenix Mercury L 51-54 1825.60 1674.51 61.40% 38.60% -17.26 2-1
1998-08-29 Phoenix Mercury W 74-69 1808.34 1691.77 74.58% 25.42% +9.22 3-1
1998-09-01 Phoenix Mercury W 80-71 1817.56 1682.55 76.54% 23.46% +11.42 4-1
1998-08-22 Cleveland Rockers W 78-68 1627.21 1652.53 56.46% 43.54% +22.34 1-0
1998-08-24 @ Cleveland Rockers L 66-67 1649.55 1630.19 42.70% 57.30% -6.93 1-1
1998-08-25 @ Cleveland Rockers W 71-60 1642.62 1637.12 40.76% 59.24% +31.89 2-1
1998-08-27 Houston Comets W 54-51 1674.51 1825.60 38.60% 61.40% +17.26 3-1
1998-08-29 @ Houston Comets L 69-74 1691.77 1808.34 25.42% 74.58% -9.22 3-2
1998-09-01 @ Houston Comets L 71-80 1682.55 1817.56 23.46% 76.54% -11.42 3-3

Biggest Upsets

The 25 biggest upsets of the seasons, ranked by lowest pregame win probability. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1998-08-01 9.54% Cleveland Rockers 1522.82 74 @ Houston Comets 1843.23 71
2 1998-07-22 13.28% Utah Starzz 1354.87 61 @ Charlotte Sting 1610.36 58
3 1998-07-18 15.85% New York Liberty 1461.44 69 @ Phoenix Mercury 1680.95 63
4 1998-07-27 16.40% Sacramento Monarchs 1359.72 76 @ Charlotte Sting 1572.22 70
5 1998-06-27 17.91% Detroit Shock 1381.80 84 @ Cleveland Rockers 1575.89 73
6 1998-08-09 20.25% @ Washington Mystics 1162.96 76 Los Angeles Sparks 1471.51 74
7 1998-07-27 24.79% @ Utah Starzz 1366.71 90 Phoenix Mercury 1629.98 80
8 1998-07-02 25.71% Utah Starzz 1367.88 58 @ Los Angeles Sparks 1481.81 57
9 1998-07-08 27.27% Sacramento Monarchs 1393.43 76 @ Los Angeles Sparks 1493.43 71
10 1998-08-12 27.46% Los Angeles Sparks 1453.21 65 @ Charlotte Sting 1551.51 52
11 1998-08-15 29.27% @ New York Liberty 1620.45 70 Houston Comets 1844.13 54
12 1998-07-11 29.28% @ Washington Mystics 1246.12 78 Detroit Shock 1469.73 53
13 1998-06-21 32.67% Charlotte Sting 1545.03 72 @ Phoenix Mercury 1600.23 71
14 1998-07-23 33.06% @ Los Angeles Sparks 1452.33 70 Phoenix Mercury 1645.35 68
15 1998-08-10 33.73% Phoenix Mercury 1554.47 82 @ Cleveland Rockers 1601.35 80
16 1998-08-17 34.64% Cleveland Rockers 1626.55 70 @ New York Liberty 1666.37 64
17 1998-06-21 34.76% Detroit Shock 1311.91 70 @ Washington Mystics 1350.84 57
18 1998-07-19 35.04% @ Cleveland Rockers 1462.92 85 Charlotte Sting 1640.56 69
19 1998-06-29 35.70% @ Detroit Shock 1425.99 60 Charlotte Sting 1598.67 49
20 1998-08-16 37.35% Detroit Shock 1492.95 77 @ Los Angeles Sparks 1512.37 76
21 1998-08-27 * 38.60% @ Phoenix Mercury 1674.51 54 Houston Comets 1825.60 51
22 1998-08-19 40.50% @ Detroit Shock 1503.12 82 New York Liberty 1640.39 68
23 1998-07-21 40.74% New York Liberty 1494.89 92 @ Los Angeles Sparks 1489.58 77
24 1998-08-25 * 40.76% Phoenix Mercury 1642.62 71 @ Cleveland Rockers 1637.12 60
25 1998-06-19 41.17% @ Washington Mystics 1322.20 85 Utah Starzz 1454.61 76

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1998-07-11 57.39 @ Washington Mystics 78 1246.12 29.28% Detroit Shock 53 1469.73 70.72%
2 1998-08-15 45.92 @ New York Liberty 70 1620.45 29.27% Houston Comets 54 1844.13 70.73%
3 1998-06-27 44.19 Detroit Shock 84 1381.80 17.91% @ Cleveland Rockers 73 1575.89 82.09%
4 1998-08-12 42.45 Los Angeles Sparks 65 1453.21 27.46% @ Charlotte Sting 52 1551.51 72.54%
5 1998-07-19 42.17 @ Cleveland Rockers 85 1462.92 35.04% Charlotte Sting 69 1640.56 64.96%
6 1998-07-27 38.60 @ Utah Starzz 90 1366.71 24.79% Phoenix Mercury 80 1629.98 75.21%
7 1998-06-21 38.18 Detroit Shock 70 1311.91 34.76% @ Washington Mystics 57 1350.84 65.24%
8 1998-06-18 37.87 New York Liberty 64 1494.23 41.67% @ Sacramento Monarchs 48 1482.25 58.33%
9 1998-07-21 37.25 New York Liberty 92 1494.89 40.74% @ Los Angeles Sparks 77 1489.58 59.26%
10 1998-07-01 37.21 @ Detroit Shock 82 1460.60 44.41% New York Liberty 65 1570.08 55.59%
11 1998-07-31 36.93 @ Los Angeles Sparks 71 1452.20 41.26% Phoenix Mercury 56 1584.03 58.74%
12 1998-08-19 36.14 @ Detroit Shock 82 1503.12 40.50% New York Liberty 68 1640.39 59.50%
13 1998-07-12 35.52 Charlotte Sting 75 1586.77 48.42% @ New York Liberty 57 1527.33 51.58%
14 1998-08-15 35.17 @ Sacramento Monarchs 82 1327.43 58.30% Utah Starzz 55 1339.67 41.70%
15 1998-06-29 34.62 @ Detroit Shock 60 1425.99 35.70% Charlotte Sting 49 1598.67 64.30%
16 1998-07-18 33.45 New York Liberty 69 1461.44 15.85% @ Phoenix Mercury 63 1680.95 84.15%
17 1998-07-27 33.24 Sacramento Monarchs 76 1359.72 16.40% @ Charlotte Sting 70 1572.22 83.60%
18 1998-07-12 32.12 @ Los Angeles Sparks 87 1467.03 56.81% Cleveland Rockers 66 1489.83 43.19%
19 1998-08-25 * 31.89 Phoenix Mercury 71 1642.62 40.76% @ Cleveland Rockers 60 1637.12 59.24%
20 1998-06-15 31.62 Houston Comets 79 1627.60 47.94% @ Charlotte Sting 65 1571.51 52.06%
21 1998-07-02 31.24 Phoenix Mercury 76 1618.94 50.31% @ Cleveland Rockers 61 1546.38 49.69%
22 1998-07-19 29.89 Utah Starzz 99 1324.98 44.48% @ Washington Mystics 88 1293.08 55.52%
23 1998-07-18 29.54 @ Detroit Shock 72 1442.96 53.01% Cleveland Rockers 57 1492.46 46.99%
24 1998-06-15 29.02 @ Utah Starzz 71 1425.59 46.09% New York Liberty 60 1523.25 53.91%
25 1998-07-26 28.68 Sacramento Monarchs 79 1331.04 52.77% @ Washington Mystics 65 1241.34 47.23%