2014 USL Season

182 regular-season games

Final

Season Status

In Progress

Awaiting final results

Title Favorite

Orlando City SC

27.58% chance to win USL Championship

Biggest Overachiever

Sacramento Republic

10.02 points above expected

49 points · 38.98 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Orange County Blues FC

8.74 points below expected

25 points · 33.74 expected points

Final Standings

Final regular season records. The vsSim column shows actual points minus the simulation's mean points - positive values indicate the team overachieved, negative values mean they underperformed.

#	Team	W	L	T	Pts	Pt%	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Orlando City SC	17	4	5	56	.718	51	21	+30	46.91	+9.09
2	Richmond Kickers	13	3	10	49	.628	53	28	+25	46.08	+2.92
3	Sacramento Republic	15	7	4	49	.628	42	24	+18	38.98	+10.02
4	Los Angeles Galaxy II	13	7	6	45	.577	52	38	+14	39.21	+5.79
5	Charleston Battery	10	9	7	37	.474	34	30	+4	38.99	-1.99
6	Wilmington Hammerheads	9	7	10	37	.474	33	30	+3	33.98	+3.02
7	Arizona United SC	10	11	5	35	.449	31	38	-7	29.95	+5.05
8	Harrisburg City Islanders	9	10	7	34	.436	42	44	-2	35.42	-1.42
9	Rochester Rhinos	8	10	8	32	.410	24	25	-1	31.67	+0.33
10	Charlotte Eagles	9	14	3	30	.385	30	36	-6	34.40	-4.40
11	OKC Energy FC	8	13	5	29	.372	31	36	-5	36.18	-7.18
12	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	7	14	5	26	.333	27	46	-19	29.91	-3.91
13	Orange County Blues FC	8	17	1	25	.321	29	52	-23	33.74	-8.74
14	Dayton Dutch Lions	6	16	4	22	.282	27	58	-31	29.99	-7.99

Playoff Bracket

Season Summary

Every team's regular season finish compared against the simulated win totals. Click on any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual total minus the simulation's mean. Positive values indicate the team outperformed the expected total; negative values indicate the team was unluckier than expected. Percentile represents where their actual result fell in the simulated distribution.

Team	Elo	Points	Avg. Pts.	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Orlando City SC	1630	56	46.91	+9.09	92.66%	17	36	42	47	51	58	74
Richmond Kickers	1614	49	46.08	+2.92	69.33%	15	35	42	46	51	57	72
Sacramento Republic	1560	49	38.98	+10.02	94.15%	11	28	34	39	44	50	68
Los Angeles Galaxy II	1540	45	39.21	+5.79	82.41%	11	28	35	39	44	50	68
Charleston Battery	1540	37	38.99	-1.99	41.24%	13	28	34	39	44	50	66
Harrisburg City Islanders	1501	34	35.42	-1.42	45.05%	10	25	31	35	40	47	66
Wilmington Hammerheads	1498	37	33.98	+3.02	70.43%	6	23	29	34	38	45	63
OKC Energy FC	1483	29	36.18	-7.18	16.01%	10	25	32	36	41	47	65
Charlotte Eagles	1481	30	34.40	-4.40	28.24%	7	24	30	34	39	45	62
Rochester Rhinos	1468	32	31.67	+0.33	55.74%	6	21	27	32	36	43	58
Arizona United SC	1456	35	29.95	+5.05	80.26%	4	19	25	30	34	41	57
Orange County Blues FC	1420	25	33.74	-8.74	10.67%	6	23	29	34	38	45	62
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	1418	26	29.91	-3.91	30.60%	3	19	25	30	34	41	58
Dayton Dutch Lions	1390	22	29.99	-7.99	12.53%	4	19	26	30	34	41	58

Head-to-Head

Cells show the number of points earned against each opponent with the expected points from the simulation below. Gold-tinted cells indicate the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point while navy-tinted cells indicate they fell short by more than one point.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Team	SC	Battery	Eagles	Lions	Islanders	II	FC	FC	SC	Riverhounds	Kickers	Rhinos	Republic	Hammerheads
Arizona United SC	—	0 (1.0 exp.)	3 (1.3 exp.)	0 (1.5 exp.)	3 (1.1 exp.)	2 (4.3 exp.)	7 (4.6 exp.)	6 (4.8 exp.)	0 (1.0 exp.)	6 (2.9 exp.)	0 (0.9 exp.)	3 (1.3 exp.)	4 (4.3 exp.)	1 (1.0 exp.)
Charleston Battery	3 (1.8 exp.)	—	1 (3.2 exp.)	4 (3.4 exp.)	6 (4.5 exp.)	3 (1.5 exp.)	3 (1.4 exp.)	3 (1.8 exp.)	1 (3.5 exp.)	7 (5.3 exp.)	2 (3.4 exp.)	4 (4.8 exp.)	0 (1.2 exp.)	0 (3.3 exp.)
Charlotte Eagles	0 (1.5 exp.)	4 (2.4 exp.)	—	3 (4.8 exp.)	1 (2.8 exp.)	0 (1.2 exp.)	1 (1.6 exp.)	3 (2.9 exp.)	3 (2.7 exp.)	0 (3.3 exp.)	3 (2.9 exp.)	6 (2.9 exp.)	0 (1.4 exp.)	6 (4.1 exp.)
Dayton Dutch Lions	3 (1.3 exp.)	1 (2.1 exp.)	6 (3.5 exp.)	—	3 (4.8 exp.)	1 (2.2 exp.)	0 (1.2 exp.)	0 (1.1 exp.)	0 (1.5 exp.)	3 (2.8 exp.)	1 (1.8 exp.)	1 (4.3 exp.)	0 (1.3 exp.)	3 (2.1 exp.)
Harrisburg City Islanders	0 (1.7 exp.)	3 (3.8 exp.)	4 (2.7 exp.)	9 (6.3 exp.)	—	3 (1.3 exp.)	1 (1.5 exp.)	0 (1.3 exp.)	3 (1.9 exp.)	5 (4.6 exp.)	0 (2.8 exp.)	1 (3.3 exp.)	3 (1.2 exp.)	2 (2.9 exp.)
Los Angeles Galaxy II	8 (6.9 exp.)	0 (1.3 exp.)	3 (1.6 exp.)	4 (3.4 exp.)	0 (1.5 exp.)	—	12 (5.8 exp.)	12 (5.8 exp.)	0 (0.9 exp.)	0 (1.7 exp.)	1 (1.2 exp.)	0 (1.8 exp.)	4 (5.6 exp.)	1 (1.7 exp.)
OKC Energy FC	4 (6.5 exp.)	0 (1.4 exp.)	1 (1.2 exp.)	3 (1.6 exp.)	1 (1.2 exp.)	0 (5.2 exp.)	—	9 (6.2 exp.)	0 (2.3 exp.)	3 (1.7 exp.)	0 (1.2 exp.)	1 (1.6 exp.)	6 (4.9 exp.)	1 (1.1 exp.)
Orange County Blues FC	6 (6.3 exp.)	0 (1.0 exp.)	3 (2.7 exp.)	3 (1.6 exp.)	3 (1.4 exp.)	0 (5.3 exp.)	3 (4.9 exp.)	—	0 (0.8 exp.)	0 (1.3 exp.)	1 (0.8 exp.)	3 (1.2 exp.)	3 (5.0 exp.)	0 (1.3 exp.)
Orlando City SC	3 (1.8 exp.)	7 (4.9 exp.)	6 (5.7 exp.)	6 (4.2 exp.)	3 (3.7 exp.)	3 (1.9 exp.)	6 (3.3 exp.)	3 (2.0 exp.)	—	4 (3.7 exp.)	6 (2.8 exp.)	4 (5.7 exp.)	1 (1.8 exp.)	4 (5.6 exp.)
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	0 (2.6 exp.)	1 (3.1 exp.)	6 (2.3 exp.)	3 (2.7 exp.)	2 (3.7 exp.)	3 (1.0 exp.)	0 (1.0 exp.)	3 (1.4 exp.)	1 (1.9 exp.)	—	1 (2.7 exp.)	6 (3.9 exp.)	0 (1.0 exp.)	0 (2.5 exp.)
Richmond Kickers	3 (1.9 exp.)	5 (4.9 exp.)	6 (5.4 exp.)	4 (3.8 exp.)	9 (5.6 exp.)	1 (1.6 exp.)	3 (1.6 exp.)	1 (2.0 exp.)	0 (2.8 exp.)	7 (5.6 exp.)	—	2 (3.7 exp.)	3 (1.9 exp.)	5 (5.3 exp.)
Rochester Rhinos	0 (1.4 exp.)	4 (3.5 exp.)	0 (2.6 exp.)	7 (4.0 exp.)	4 (2.2 exp.)	3 (0.9 exp.)	1 (1.2 exp.)	0 (1.6 exp.)	4 (2.7 exp.)	3 (4.4 exp.)	2 (1.9 exp.)	—	0 (1.3 exp.)	4 (3.8 exp.)
Sacramento Republic	7 (6.8 exp.)	3 (1.6 exp.)	3 (1.3 exp.)	3 (1.5 exp.)	0 (1.6 exp.)	7 (5.5 exp.)	6 (6.2 exp.)	9 (6.1 exp.)	1 (1.0 exp.)	3 (1.8 exp.)	0 (0.9 exp.)	3 (1.4 exp.)	—	4 (3.3 exp.)
Wilmington Hammerheads	1 (1.7 exp.)	6 (2.3 exp.)	3 (4.2 exp.)	3 (3.4 exp.)	2 (2.6 exp.)	1 (1.1 exp.)	1 (1.6 exp.)	3 (1.5 exp.)	4 (2.8 exp.)	6 (3.0 exp.)	2 (3.1 exp.)	4 (4.5 exp.)	1 (2.2 exp.)	—

Scoreline Distribution

Cells represent the percentage of games that ended with a team's goals in the row and its opponent's goals in the column. Cells below the diagonal are wins (gold), and cells above are losses (blue). Totals along the edges show the marginal percentages for that row or column.

Win Loss Same range

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	9.34%	5.77%	1.65%	1.92%	0.82%	26.65%
1	9.34%	10.44%	7.97%	5.22%	1.65%	1.10%	35.71%
2	5.77%	7.97%	3.30%	1.92%	0.82%	—	19.78%
3	1.65%	5.22%	1.92%	1.10%	0.55%	0.27%	10.71%
4	1.92%	1.65%	0.82%	0.55%	—	—	4.95%
5+	0.82%	1.10%	—	0.27%	—	—	2.20%
Total	26.65%	35.71%	19.78%	10.71%	4.95%	2.20%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.39	1.39	+0.00
SD	1.27	1.27	1.88
CV	0.92	0.92	—
Max	7	7	+7
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	26.92%
1	11.54%	15.38%	7.69%	—	—	—	34.62%
2	—	19.23%	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	30.77%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	19.23%	46.15%	15.38%	7.69%	11.54%	—	100%

Arizona United SC — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.19	1.46	-0.27
SD	0.94	1.24	1.66
CV	0.79	0.85	—
Max	3	4	+3
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	15.38%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	34.62%
1	3.85%	7.69%	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	23.08%
2	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	26.92%
3	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
4	7.69%	—	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	38.46%	30.77%	15.38%	7.69%	7.69%	—	100%

Charleston Battery — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.31	1.15	+0.15
SD	1.26	1.26	1.97
CV	0.96	1.09	—
Max	4	4	+4
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	15.38%	7.69%	—	—	—	26.92%
1	3.85%	7.69%	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	—	38.46%
2	15.38%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	—	26.92%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	23.08%	38.46%	23.08%	7.69%	7.69%	—	100%

Charlotte Eagles — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.15	1.38	-0.23
SD	0.92	1.17	1.58
CV	0.80	0.84	—
Max	3	4	+2
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	30.77%
1	11.54%	11.54%	11.54%	3.85%	—	7.69%	46.15%
2	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
3	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	11.54%	30.77%	26.92%	7.69%	7.69%	15.38%	100%

Dayton Dutch Lions — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.04	2.23	-1.19
SD	0.96	1.80	2.04
CV	0.92	0.80	—
Max	3	7	+2
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	11.54%	—	—	3.85%	—	26.92%
1	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	30.77%
2	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
3	—	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
4	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%
Total	15.38%	38.46%	19.23%	15.38%	11.54%	—	100%

Harrisburg City Islanders — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.62	1.69	-0.08
SD	1.47	1.26	1.74
CV	0.91	0.74	—
Max	5	4	+3
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	11.54%	—	—	11.54%
1	7.69%	19.23%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	42.31%
2	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
3	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
4	3.85%	—	7.69%	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	19.23%	38.46%	19.23%	23.08%	—	—	100%

Los Angeles Galaxy II — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.00	1.46	+0.54
SD	1.52	1.07	2.16
CV	0.76	0.73	—
Max	5	3	+5
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	19.23%	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	30.77%
1	7.69%	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	34.62%
2	15.38%	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	23.08%
3	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
4	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	34.62%	26.92%	19.23%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	100%

OKC Energy FC — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.19	1.38	-0.19
SD	1.10	1.44	1.96
CV	0.92	1.04	—
Max	4	5	+4
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	—	30.77%
1	11.54%	3.85%	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	46.15%
2	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
3	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
4	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	15.38%	23.08%	26.92%	23.08%	7.69%	3.85%	100%

Orange County Blues FC — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.12	2.00	-0.88
SD	1.14	1.44	1.90
CV	1.02	0.72	—
Max	4	6	+3
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
1	15.38%	11.54%	—	3.85%	—	—	30.77%
2	11.54%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
3	3.85%	15.38%	3.85%	—	—	—	23.08%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	42.31%	42.31%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	100%

Orlando City SC — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.96	0.81	+1.15
SD	1.59	0.90	1.85
CV	0.81	1.11	—
Max	7	3	+7
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	15.38%	3.85%	—	3.85%	3.85%	34.62%
1	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	15.38%	—	3.85%	38.46%
2	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
3	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	11.54%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	23.08%	30.77%	15.38%	15.38%	7.69%	7.69%	100%

Pittsburgh Riverhounds — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.04	1.77	-0.73
SD	1.00	1.56	1.85
CV	0.96	0.88	—
Max	3	5	+2
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
1	3.85%	23.08%	3.85%	—	—	—	30.77%
2	3.85%	11.54%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	30.77%
3	—	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
4	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	19.23%	57.69%	19.23%	3.85%	—	—	100%

Richmond Kickers — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.04	1.08	+0.96
SD	1.28	0.74	1.51
CV	0.63	0.69	—
Max	5	3	+4
Min	0	0	-1

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	15.38%	19.23%	3.85%	—	—	—	38.46%
1	15.38%	11.54%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	38.46%
2	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	38.46%	38.46%	11.54%	11.54%	—	—	100%

Rochester Rhinos — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	0.92	0.96	-0.04
SD	0.98	1.00	1.28
CV	1.06	1.04	—
Max	4	3	+3
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
1	15.38%	7.69%	19.23%	—	—	—	42.31%
2	3.85%	23.08%	—	—	—	—	26.92%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	34.62%	38.46%	26.92%	—	—	—	100%

Sacramento Republic — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.62	0.92	+0.69
SD	1.42	0.80	1.76
CV	0.88	0.86	—
Max	6	2	+5
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	23.08%	—	19.23%	—	—	—	42.31%
1	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
2	—	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
3	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
4	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	38.46%	19.23%	30.77%	11.54%	—	—	100%

Wilmington Hammerheads — Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.27	1.15	+0.12
SD	1.48	1.08	1.63
CV	1.17	0.94	—
Max	5	3	+4
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.75	+8.8
Allowed	0.60	-7.2
Differential	0.94	+5.6

Home-Field Advantage Edge

A measure of how well each team has taken advantage of home-field advantage during the season. For each team, sum the win probabilities for home games and compare against the team's actual performance at home. Repeat for games on the road. Positive values indicate the team has played comparatively better at home than on the road. Negative values indicate the team is not utilizing home field advantage.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

The teams that deviated the most from the simulated results.

Top Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	Luck
1	Sacramento Republic	49	38.98	+10.02
2	Orlando City SC	56	46.91	+9.09
3	Los Angeles Galaxy II	45	39.21	+5.79
4	Arizona United SC	35	29.95	+5.05
5	Wilmington Hammerheads	37	33.98	+3.02

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	Luck
1	Orange County Blues FC	25	33.74	-8.74
2	Dayton Dutch Lions	22	29.99	-7.99
3	OKC Energy FC	29	36.18	-7.18
4	Charlotte Eagles	30	34.40	-4.40
5	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	26	29.91	-3.91

Top Streaks

The most unlikely streaks achieved by teams throughout the season according to the model's probabilities. Calculated by using the pregame win/tie/loss probabilities for all the games in each team's streak. Unbeaten counts W or T consecutively; Winless counts L or T consecutively.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Sacramento Republic	6	Jul 28 – Aug 28	1 in 82
2	Arizona United SC	4	Aug 15 – Sep 7	1 in 67
3	Wilmington Hammerheads	4	May 11 – Jun 1	1 in 65
4	Orlando City SC	7	May 18 – Jul 13	1 in 59
5	Harrisburg City Islanders	3	Jul 31 – Aug 10	1 in 22

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	OKC Energy FC	6	Aug 10 – Sep 5	1 in 313
2	Orange County Blues FC	6	Jul 8 – Aug 9	1 in 265
3	Dayton Dutch Lions	5	May 17 – Jun 9	1 in 58
4	Wilmington Hammerheads	4	Jul 27 – Aug 21	1 in 39
5	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	4	May 10 – May 25	1 in 20

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Richmond Kickers	19	Apr 20 – Aug 17	1 in 231
2	Orlando City SC	16	Mar 23 – Jul 18	1 in 123
3	Wilmington Hammerheads	8	May 4 – Jun 29	1 in 79
4	Sacramento Republic	10	Jul 15 – Sep 5	1 in 56
5	Rochester Rhinos	6	Apr 12 – May 18	1 in 50

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Richmond Kickers	5	Aug 17 – Sep 7	1 in 41
2	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	10	Mar 30 – Jun 2	1 in 36
3	Dayton Dutch Lions	8	Apr 27 – Jun 9	1 in 25
4	OKC Energy FC	7	Apr 27 – Jun 8	1 in 19
5	Orange County Blues FC	6	Jul 8 – Aug 9	1 in 17

Finish Position Heatmaps

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team finished in a given position in the simulation.

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Orlando City SC	36.89%	22.67%	13.46%	8.82%	5.96%	4.06%	2.82%	1.85%	1.35%	0.94%	0.58%	0.35%	0.18%	0.09%
Richmond Kickers	31.56%	22.95%	14.51%	9.67%	6.66%	4.67%	3.30%	2.29%	1.67%	1.10%	0.73%	0.50%	0.26%	0.12%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	6.61%	10.35%	12.16%	11.63%	10.64%	9.53%	8.48%	7.27%	6.32%	5.28%	4.37%	3.35%	2.47%	1.51%
Charleston Battery	6.78%	9.77%	11.38%	11.57%	10.72%	9.78%	8.63%	7.52%	6.44%	5.46%	4.41%	3.45%	2.50%	1.60%
Sacramento Republic	6.11%	9.99%	11.68%	11.57%	10.83%	9.55%	8.54%	7.53%	6.50%	5.48%	4.48%	3.50%	2.67%	1.58%
OKC Energy FC	3.09%	5.49%	7.60%	8.62%	9.20%	9.33%	9.20%	8.88%	8.54%	7.87%	6.99%	6.28%	5.17%	3.76%
Harrisburg City Islanders	2.44%	4.54%	6.36%	7.82%	8.48%	9.01%	9.25%	9.30%	8.73%	8.43%	7.87%	6.97%	6.07%	4.73%
Charlotte Eagles	1.83%	3.50%	5.19%	6.58%	7.63%	8.49%	8.79%	9.19%	9.18%	9.06%	8.72%	8.29%	7.61%	5.92%
Wilmington Hammerheads	1.52%	3.15%	4.79%	6.11%	7.22%	8.14%	8.82%	8.96%	9.34%	9.32%	9.16%	8.80%	8.09%	6.58%
Orange County Blues FC	1.28%	3.01%	4.89%	5.96%	7.00%	7.85%	8.34%	8.99%	9.26%	9.27%	9.42%	9.03%	8.46%	7.25%
Rochester Rhinos	0.73%	1.73%	2.71%	3.86%	4.98%	5.96%	7.00%	8.04%	8.88%	9.79%	10.82%	11.20%	11.92%	12.38%
Arizona United SC	0.37%	1.01%	1.84%	2.69%	3.60%	4.53%	5.58%	6.67%	7.81%	9.31%	10.65%	12.75%	15.20%	18.00%
Dayton Dutch Lions	0.38%	0.94%	1.73%	2.59%	3.55%	4.64%	5.61%	6.90%	8.10%	9.35%	10.85%	12.59%	14.79%	17.99%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	0.42%	0.92%	1.70%	2.50%	3.54%	4.46%	5.64%	6.60%	7.88%	9.35%	10.95%	12.93%	14.64%	18.48%

Win Totals in Context

How each team's actual results compared to their simulated results, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Click a division name in the legend to toggle it on or off.

Playoff Seed Probabilities

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team earned a given playoff seed in the simulation. Teams are sorted by likelihood of earning the top seed. Teams that missed the playoffs more often sit toward the bottom.

Team	1 Seed	2 Seed	3 Seed	4 Seed	5 Seed	6 Seed	7 Seed	8 Seed	Missed Playoffs
Orlando City SC	36.89%	22.67%	13.46%	8.82%	5.96%	4.06%	2.82%	1.85%	3.48%
Richmond Kickers	31.56%	22.95%	14.51%	9.67%	6.66%	4.67%	3.30%	2.29%	4.38%
Charleston Battery	6.78%	9.77%	11.38%	11.57%	10.72%	9.78%	8.63%	7.52%	23.86%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	6.61%	10.35%	12.16%	11.63%	10.64%	9.53%	8.48%	7.27%	23.32%
Sacramento Republic	6.11%	9.99%	11.68%	11.57%	10.83%	9.55%	8.54%	7.53%	24.20%
OKC Energy FC	3.09%	5.49%	7.60%	8.62%	9.20%	9.33%	9.20%	8.88%	38.59%
Harrisburg City Islanders	2.44%	4.54%	6.36%	7.82%	8.48%	9.01%	9.25%	9.30%	42.80%
Charlotte Eagles	1.83%	3.50%	5.19%	6.58%	7.63%	8.49%	8.79%	9.19%	48.79%
Wilmington Hammerheads	1.52%	3.15%	4.79%	6.11%	7.22%	8.14%	8.82%	8.96%	51.28%
Orange County Blues FC	1.28%	3.01%	4.89%	5.96%	7.00%	7.85%	8.34%	8.99%	52.68%
Rochester Rhinos	0.73%	1.73%	2.71%	3.86%	4.98%	5.96%	7.00%	8.04%	64.99%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	0.42%	0.92%	1.70%	2.50%	3.54%	4.46%	5.64%	6.60%	74.22%
Dayton Dutch Lions	0.38%	0.94%	1.73%	2.59%	3.55%	4.64%	5.61%	6.90%	73.67%
Arizona United SC	0.37%	1.01%	1.84%	2.69%	3.60%	4.53%	5.58%	6.67%	73.72%

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Percentage of games won by the home team - percentage of games won by the away team
No Edge: under 2% · Slight Edge: 2% to 6% · Clear Edge: 6% to 10% · Fortress: 10% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points that 1 goal is worth. A team this many Elo ratings points better than another would be expected to defeat their opponent by 1 goal at a neutral location.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals - average away goals per game. The gold line represents the expected home goals edge according to the scoring value of a point of Elo and the number of Elo rating points home advantage is worth.
Road-Tilted: under -0.8 · Lean Road: -0.8 to 0 · Lean Home: 0 to 0.8 · Home-Tilted: 0.8 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+7.69%

Clear Edge

42.86%21.98%35.16%

Elo Value

Home Edge: 26.78 Elo pts.

114 Elo

0.009 goals per Elo point

0300

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.26 goals

Lean Home

-2+0.23+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of preseason title contenders. Calculated by taking 1 divided by the sum of squared preseason title odds. Higher numbers indicate more parity in the league while 1 indicates that the preseason favorite is a near-lock.
Front-Runner: under 2 · Few Contenders: 2 to 4 · Open Race: 4 to 8 · Wide Open: 8 and up.

Title-Race Openness

6.0

Open Race

124810

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Average standard deviation of the difference between each team's actual points total and their simulated average points total. The gold line is the standard deviation the model expected from random chance alone.
Subdued: under 5.31 · As Expected: 5.31 to 7.3 · Elevated: 7.3 to 9.95 · High Variance: 9.95 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap in the rank of the final standings between where each team finished in the standings and where the model projected them to finish.
Pinpoint: under 2.36 · Close: 2.36 to 3.2 · Off Target: 3.2 to 4.17 · Well Off Target: 4.17 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team whose record finished in the highest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the top team in a league of 14 teams typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team whose record finished in the lowest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the bottom team in a league of 14 teams typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished either above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile. Even with a well-calibrated model, 10% of teams are expected to land in the extremes of their distributions.
Minimal Outliers: under 0.7 · As Expected: 0.7 to 1.68 · Several Outliers: 1.68 to 3.08 · Many Outliers: 3.08 and up.
Unexpected Playoff Teams: Number of teams that actually made the playoffs but were not in the model's projected field.The gold line represents how many playoff teams the simulation missed on average.
Fewer Than Expected: under 1.57 · As Expected: 1.57 to 2.62 · More Than Expected: 2.62 to 4.19 · Far More Than Expected: 4.19 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

5.93 points

As Expected

06.6317

Average Finish Error

Expected

2.29

Pinpoint

02.786

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 96.43%

94.15%

Sacramento Republic

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 3.57%

10.67%

Orange County Blues FC

050

Season Outliers

Expected

0 of 14

Minimal Outliers

01.47

Unexpected Playoff Teams

Expected

2 of 8

As Expected

02.18

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: Measures how evenly points were distributed across the league. Lower scores indicate there was less variability across the actual point totals .Higher scores are an indication of more imbalance in the league with a few unusually strong or unusually weak teams.
Highly Balanced: under 0.08 · Balanced: 0.08 to 0.15 · Top-Heavy: 0.15 to 0.24 · Concentrated: 0.24 and up.
Noll-Scully: Measures how more times spread out the final standings were in reality compared to standings that were generated by flipping a coin for each game. The gold line at 1 indicates as much variability in the standings as s coin flip. Above it, talent gaps in team composition stretched the standings more than the variability produced by luck alone. Below it, the league was more competitive than coin flips alone would yield.
Compressed: under 0.9 · Coin-Flip Spread: 0.9 to 1.15 · Moderate Separation: 1.15 to 1.45 · Stratified: 1.45 and up.
Interquartile Edge: The probability that the team in the 75th percentile of the league's Elo ratings would defeat the team in the 25th percentile at a neutral site. The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league.
Even: under 58% · Competitive: 58% to 65% · Tilted: 65% to 73% · Lopsided: 73% and up.
Best vs. Worst: The probability that the team with the highest Elo rating would defeat the team with the lowest Elo rating at a neutral site.The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league. The gold line represents how high this probability is expected to be in a league of this size. A blue dot to the right indicates an unusually dominant team or an unusually weak team.
Tight: under 65% · Clear Edge: 65% to 78% · Lopsided: 78% to 88% · No Contest: 88% and up.
Close Games: Actual percentage of games decided by 1 goal or fewer. The gold line indicates the proportion of close games you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Mostly Decisive: under 25% · Some Drama: 25% to 38% · Often Close: 38% to 50% · Nail-Biters: 50% and up.
Blowouts: Actual percentage of games decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line indicates the proportion of blowouts you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Rare: under 10% · Occasional: 10% to 20% · Frequent: 20% to 30% · Routine: 30% and up.

Gini Index

0.15

Top-Heavy

00.080.150.240.5

Noll-Scully

Coin-flip

1.33

Moderate Separation

01.003

Interquartile Edge

61%

Competitive

50%58%65%73%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline

80%

Lopsided

50%81%100%

Close Games

Expected

62%

Nail-Biters

0%57%100%

Blowouts

Expected

14%

Occasional

0%18%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame win probabilities aligned with the actual game result, averaged over the entire season. Picks that were both confident and correct are rewarded the most, while incorrect predictions and/or uncertain predictions are penalized more. Lower scores are better. 0 indicates every game was perfectly predicted with maximum confidence. For sports with where wins and losses are the only outcomes, Brier scores less than 0.25 indicate the model did better than random predictions. For sports where ties are possible, 0.67 is the cutoff for which the Brier score must be lower to beat random predictions. The lower the Brier score, the easier and more accurately the games were to predict.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 · Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 · Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 · Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, calculated by averaging the difference in the win probabilities divided by the sum of the win probabilities. Lower scores indicate more parity in the league. 0 indicates that every game was a 50-50 toss-up between evenly matched teams. 1 means every game pitted a heavy favorite against a huge underdog.
Evenly Matched: under 0.12 · Slight Separation: 0.12 to 0.22 · Wide Gaps: 0.22 to 0.34 · Lopsided: 0.34 and up.
Strangeness: How extreme the actual final standings were compared to what the model expected. A value of 0 would indicate that the simulated results perfectly matched the actual standings. A score of 1 indicates that the actual results were scattered around the projections by exactly the variance the model predicted. (i.e. The projections missed the actual standings by 1 standard deviation on average. Scores larger than 1 mean the season was wilder to forecast with more overperforming and underperforming teams than expected. Scores less than 1 indicate the season was more predictable.
Tighter Than Modeled: under 0.85 · As Expected: 0.85 to 1.15 · Volatile: 1.15 to 1.5 · Chaotic: 1.5 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the order of the final standings aligned with the ranked preseason Elo ratings as calculated by the Spearman rank correlation. Larger values indicate that the preseason Elo ratings were a strong predictor of the team's final rank in the standings while values near 0 mean.
Reshuffled: under 0.3 · Weak Alignment: 0.3 to 0.6 · Strong Alignment: 0.6 to 0.85 · Closely Aligned: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate: The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality. The gold line measures how often the model expected the underdog to win when considering the outcome probabilities. A blue dot to the right of the gold line means upsets were more prevalent than left. A dot to the left indicates that favorites won more often than expected.
Chalk Held: under 30% · As Expected: 30% to 40% · Upset-Prone: 40% to 46% · Bedlam: 46% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality, but only including games with a clear favorite, one at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside. This metrics ignores games that could be considered toss-ups. The gold line is how often the model expected these heavy favorites to lose. A dot to the right means the big favorites were upset more than expected; to the left means they took care of business.
Favorites Held: under 22% · As Expected: 22% to 32% · Shaky Favorites: 32% to 42% · Bedlam: 42% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.62

Predictable

00.632

Matchup Imbalance

0.22

Slight Separation

00.120.220.340.5

Strangeness

Expected

0.80

Tighter Than Modeled

01.002

Repeatability

0.51

Weak Alignment

00.30.60.851

Upset Rate

Expected

32%

As Expected

0%30%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

20%

Favorites Held

0%26%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Games are sorted into bins according to how confident the model was. Within each bin, the predicted number of wins, losses, and ties are compared against the actual counts. The p-value of this test is plotted below. Values above 0.05 indicate that the model's probabilities are well-calibrated for the season.
Clear Misfit: under 0.01 · Misfit: 0.01 to 0.05 · Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 · Well Calibrated: 0.1 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the model's probabilities is correct. Each probability is turned into their log-odds. A line is fit that predicts the actual results from the log-odds. The slope of this line is the calibration slope.A slope of 1.00 is perfect, indicating that the model's confidence matches the actual outcomes of the games. Slopes less than 1.00 indicate overconfidence. The model assigned higher probabilities to the favorites than was appropriate given the matchup, causing more losses by favored teams. Slopes greater than 1.00 indicate under-confidence. The model is more uncertain about too many results, assigning them lower probabilities when in reality the favorites should have had higher probabilities.
Overconfident: under 0.85 · Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 · Underconfident: 1.15 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): Calibration error (ECE) checks whether the model's probabilities mean what they say. ECE is calculated as the average weighted gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted outcome actually occurred. The smaller the ECE, the more confident we are about the model's probabilities. The gold line represents the noise ceiling, which is the amount of error that luck can produce on its own even if the probabilities are perfectly calibrated. Values below the noise ceiling indicate that the model's error is no larger than chance alone would produce. Values above the noice ceiling point to a genuine calibration issue since the error is larger than luck could explain.
Well Within Noise: under 0.06 · Within Noise: 0.06 to 0.12 · Above Noise: 0.12 to 0.24 · Well Above Noise: 0.24 and up.

Probability calibration

0.24

Well Calibrated

0.010.050.11

Calibration slope

Ideal

1.38

Underconfident

0.51.001.5

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.062

Within Noise

00.1180.3

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual points, simulated final points, playoff probability, and division-title probability - day by day. Select a division to see all five charts for its teams.

Elo Through the Playoffs

How each playoff team's Elo rating evolved as the postseason unfolded. Elo Progression traces each team's game-by-game Elo rating through their playoff run. Net Elo Change summarizes the difference in Elo rating between the beginning and end of the playoffs for each team.

Stochastic Playoff Outcomes

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team	Made Playoffs	Advanced to Conference Finals	Advanced to USL Championship	Won USL Championship
Orlando City SC	96.52%	67.69%	44.07%	27.58%
Richmond Kickers	95.62%	65.16%	40.86%	24.10%
Sacramento Republic	75.80%	42.21%	21.72%	10.55%
Charleston Battery	76.14%	40.07%	19.26%	8.88%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	76.68%	40.39%	19.32%	8.81%
Harrisburg City Islanders	57.19%	24.95%	10.50%	4.17%
OKC Energy FC	61.41%	25.77%	10.22%	3.90%
Wilmington Hammerheads	48.72%	20.85%	8.60%	3.43%
Charlotte Eagles	51.21%	20.51%	8.18%	3.05%
Rochester Rhinos	35.01%	13.09%	4.84%	1.72%
Orange County Blues FC	47.32%	15.10%	4.68%	1.42%
Arizona United SC	26.28%	9.21%	3.31%	1.13%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	25.78%	7.81%	2.43%	0.72%
Dayton Dutch Lions	26.33%	7.18%	2.01%	0.53%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Arizona United SC	Charleston Battery	Charlotte Eagles	Dayton Dutch Lions	Harrisburg City Islanders	Los Angeles Galaxy II	OKC Energy FC	Orange County Blues FC	Orlando City SC	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	Richmond Kickers	Rochester Rhinos	Sacramento Republic	Wilmington Hammerheads
Arizona United SC		34.9%2.74%	46.8%1.36%	57.8%0.52%	42.9%1.57%	35.8%2.61%	44.5%1.58%	54.3%0.99%	24.9%5.08%	59.7%0.46%	24.7%4.94%	48.1%0.78%	34.9%2.48%	39.1%1.18%
Charleston Battery	65.1%2.74%		59.6%5.30%	70.8%2.60%	56.9%6.20%	50.5%8.59%	58.1%6.89%	68.5%5.17%	35.4%9.36%	67.9%2.45%	38.5%9.65%	61.2%3.50%	47.3%8.48%	58.2%5.21%
Charlotte Eagles	53.2%1.36%	40.4%5.30%		63.2%1.12%	47.6%3.48%	40.5%5.78%	49.1%3.93%	58.3%2.64%	27.6%8.39%	57.4%1.18%	28.9%8.20%	50.6%1.74%	36.0%5.51%	48.6%2.57%
Dayton Dutch Lions	42.2%0.52%	29.2%2.60%	36.8%1.12%		33.9%1.32%	27.7%2.75%	34.5%1.75%	42.5%1.17%	18.1%5.19%	51.3%0.45%	18.7%4.94%	38.9%0.66%	27.6%2.73%	33.1%1.13%
Harrisburg City Islanders	57.1%1.57%	43.1%6.20%	52.4%3.48%	66.1%1.32%		44.1%6.27%	50.9%4.37%	62.6%3.22%	29.3%8.82%	63.6%1.43%	31.7%9.03%	56.4%2.07%	41.4%6.25%	49.7%3.19%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	64.2%2.61%	49.5%8.59%	59.5%5.78%	72.3%2.75%	55.9%6.27%		59.2%6.95%	68.5%5.02%	36.0%8.79%	68.9%2.71%	37.0%9.14%	61.1%3.69%	47.3%9.03%	57.0%5.36%
OKC Energy FC	55.5%1.58%	41.9%6.89%	50.9%3.93%	65.5%1.75%	49.1%4.37%	40.8%6.95%		60.5%3.35%	27.8%9.06%	60.6%1.75%	29.1%8.83%	54.2%2.45%	38.4%6.75%	47.5%3.74%
Orange County Blues FC	45.7%0.99%	31.5%5.17%	41.7%2.64%	57.5%1.17%	37.4%3.22%	31.5%5.02%	39.5%3.35%		21.2%7.93%	50.5%1.12%	22.3%7.61%	43.6%1.65%	29.3%4.95%	40.8%2.50%
Orlando City SC	75.1%5.08%	64.6%9.36%	72.4%8.39%	81.9%5.19%	70.7%8.82%	64.0%8.79%	72.2%9.06%	78.8%7.93%		79.4%5.13%	53.0%5.19%	74.1%6.50%	61.5%8.97%	70.3%8.12%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	40.3%0.46%	32.1%2.45%	42.6%1.18%	48.7%0.45%	36.4%1.43%	31.1%2.71%	39.4%1.75%	49.5%1.12%	20.6%5.13%		22.0%4.76%	43.4%0.61%	28.3%2.64%	36.2%1.09%
Richmond Kickers	75.3%4.94%	61.5%9.65%	71.1%8.20%	81.3%4.94%	68.3%9.03%	63.0%9.14%	70.9%8.83%	77.7%7.61%	47.0%5.19%	78.0%4.76%		72.4%6.15%	59.7%9.23%	68.5%7.94%
Rochester Rhinos	51.9%0.78%	38.8%3.50%	49.4%1.74%	61.1%0.66%	43.6%2.07%	38.9%3.69%	45.8%2.45%	56.4%1.65%	25.9%6.50%	56.6%0.61%	27.6%6.15%		34.5%3.65%	43.9%1.56%
Sacramento Republic	65.1%2.48%	52.7%8.48%	64.0%5.51%	72.4%2.73%	58.6%6.25%	52.7%9.03%	61.6%6.75%	70.7%4.95%	38.5%8.97%	71.7%2.64%	40.3%9.23%	65.5%3.65%		60.2%5.14%
Wilmington Hammerheads	60.9%1.18%	41.8%5.21%	51.4%2.57%	66.9%1.13%	50.3%3.19%	43.0%5.36%	52.5%3.74%	59.2%2.50%	29.7%8.12%	63.8%1.09%	31.5%7.94%	56.1%1.56%	39.8%5.14%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Arizona United SC	Charleston Battery	Charlotte Eagles	Dayton Dutch Lions	Harrisburg City Islanders	Los Angeles Galaxy II	OKC Energy FC	Orange County Blues FC	Orlando City SC	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	Richmond Kickers	Rochester Rhinos	Sacramento Republic	Wilmington Hammerheads
Arizona United SC		37.0%0.95%	46.5%0.47%	62.6%0.16%	44.5%0.58%	35.5%0.82%	47.0%0.53%	52.4%0.29%	25.8%1.74%	53.6%0.15%	27.8%1.79%	43.2%0.29%	32.3%0.92%	46.5%0.51%
Charleston Battery	63.0%0.95%		58.6%2.08%	71.6%0.69%	55.3%2.41%	49.8%4.31%	57.8%2.65%	69.0%1.55%	36.0%8.68%	67.5%0.73%	38.1%8.03%	61.9%1.31%	46.4%4.51%	58.9%2.18%
Charlotte Eagles	53.5%0.47%	41.4%2.08%		62.3%0.35%	49.1%1.27%	42.0%2.08%	50.0%1.24%	58.3%0.67%	29.9%4.10%	61.4%0.40%	29.6%3.95%	53.6%0.65%	39.4%2.28%	46.5%0.98%
Dayton Dutch Lions	37.4%0.16%	28.4%0.69%	37.7%0.35%		32.2%0.40%	31.8%0.72%	37.5%0.47%	43.7%0.26%	18.6%1.35%	37.0%0.11%	20.1%1.34%	44.4%0.21%	25.5%0.80%	37.2%0.33%
Harrisburg City Islanders	55.5%0.58%	44.7%2.41%	50.9%1.27%	67.8%0.40%		42.5%2.61%	53.1%1.62%	61.1%0.94%	31.0%5.14%	64.4%0.46%	33.5%4.82%	54.1%0.80%	39.9%2.65%	51.4%1.26%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	64.5%0.82%	50.2%4.31%	58.0%2.08%	68.2%0.72%	57.5%2.61%		58.3%2.51%	66.8%1.47%	35.8%8.79%	65.0%0.83%	37.8%8.36%	62.6%1.32%	46.5%4.38%	58.2%2.18%
OKC Energy FC	53.0%0.53%	42.2%2.65%	50.0%1.24%	62.5%0.47%	46.9%1.62%	41.7%2.51%		60.2%0.83%	28.6%5.43%	62.7%0.50%	31.0%5.21%	53.4%0.77%	39.6%2.68%	49.0%1.33%
Orange County Blues FC	47.6%0.29%	31.0%1.55%	41.7%0.67%	56.3%0.26%	38.9%0.94%	33.2%1.47%	39.8%0.83%		21.9%3.09%	54.8%0.27%	23.0%2.97%	42.1%0.45%	30.2%1.55%	37.8%0.75%
Orlando City SC	74.2%1.74%	64.0%8.68%	70.1%4.10%	81.4%1.35%	69.0%5.14%	64.2%8.79%	71.4%5.43%	78.1%3.09%		79.8%1.51%	52.2%12.05%	73.9%2.57%	60.6%9.12%	69.4%4.13%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	46.4%0.15%	32.5%0.73%	38.6%0.40%	63.0%0.11%	35.6%0.46%	35.0%0.83%	37.3%0.50%	45.2%0.27%	20.2%1.51%		22.2%1.43%	48.8%0.21%	31.8%0.82%	38.2%0.40%
Richmond Kickers	72.2%1.79%	61.9%8.03%	70.4%3.95%	79.9%1.34%	66.5%4.82%	62.2%8.36%	69.0%5.21%	77.0%2.97%	47.8%12.05%	77.8%1.43%		71.2%2.46%	58.8%8.83%	67.2%3.94%
Rochester Rhinos	56.8%0.29%	38.1%1.31%	46.4%0.65%	55.6%0.21%	45.9%0.80%	37.4%1.32%	46.6%0.77%	57.9%0.45%	26.1%2.57%	51.2%0.21%	28.8%2.46%		36.3%1.44%	43.7%0.62%
Sacramento Republic	67.7%0.92%	53.6%4.51%	60.6%2.28%	74.5%0.80%	60.1%2.65%	53.5%4.38%	60.4%2.68%	69.8%1.55%	39.4%9.12%	68.2%0.82%	41.2%8.83%	63.7%1.44%		60.9%2.23%
Wilmington Hammerheads	53.5%0.51%	41.1%2.18%	53.5%0.98%	62.8%0.33%	48.6%1.26%	41.8%2.18%	51.0%1.33%	62.2%0.75%	30.6%4.13%	61.8%0.40%	32.8%3.94%	56.3%0.62%	39.1%2.23%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Arizona United SC	Charleston Battery	Charlotte Eagles	Dayton Dutch Lions	Harrisburg City Islanders	Los Angeles Galaxy II	OKC Energy FC	Orange County Blues FC	Orlando City SC	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	Richmond Kickers	Rochester Rhinos	Sacramento Republic	Wilmington Hammerheads
Arizona United SC		44.4%0.33%	42.7%0.13%	52.2%0.02%	48.4%0.15%	39.8%0.30%	50.7%0.14%	52.6%0.06%	23.6%0.84%	46.5%0.04%	27.5%0.75%	47.4%0.08%	32.4%0.34%	39.5%0.12%
Charleston Battery	55.6%0.33%		59.2%0.76%	77.0%0.18%	55.8%0.99%	51.0%1.89%	58.8%1.00%	68.4%0.43%	36.9%5.12%	67.4%0.23%	38.7%4.73%	59.1%0.46%	47.6%2.23%	55.6%0.88%
Charlotte Eagles	57.3%0.13%	40.8%0.76%		61.3%0.07%	48.0%0.39%	41.3%0.85%	44.4%0.40%	61.2%0.15%	30.0%2.05%	63.6%0.09%	30.4%1.86%	49.7%0.16%	38.4%0.97%	42.8%0.30%
Dayton Dutch Lions	47.8%0.02%	23.0%0.18%	38.7%0.07%		33.0%0.09%	28.8%0.18%	44.7%0.09%	45.2%0.04%	20.7%0.49%	52.9%0.02%	17.2%0.47%	35.7%0.04%	29.0%0.22%	39.5%0.09%
Harrisburg City Islanders	51.6%0.15%	44.2%0.99%	52.0%0.39%	67.0%0.09%		40.6%1.05%	52.5%0.52%	59.5%0.24%	31.0%2.76%	59.8%0.09%	34.2%2.40%	54.0%0.24%	41.5%1.16%	50.1%0.43%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	60.2%0.30%	49.0%1.89%	58.7%0.85%	71.2%0.18%	59.4%1.05%		55.1%0.96%	66.1%0.45%	35.9%5.25%	63.7%0.24%	39.4%4.66%	61.9%0.47%	46.1%2.18%	54.4%0.83%
OKC Energy FC	49.3%0.14%	41.2%1.00%	55.6%0.40%	55.3%0.09%	47.5%0.52%	44.9%0.96%		64.3%0.18%	28.7%2.60%	62.8%0.11%	31.2%2.42%	55.0%0.22%	38.7%1.16%	50.1%0.41%
Orange County Blues FC	47.4%0.06%	31.6%0.43%	38.8%0.15%	54.8%0.04%	40.5%0.24%	33.9%0.45%	35.7%0.18%		23.5%1.20%	42.9%0.05%	24.2%1.06%	37.8%0.10%	36.4%0.49%	37.1%0.23%
Orlando City SC	76.4%0.84%	63.1%5.12%	70.0%2.05%	79.3%0.49%	69.0%2.76%	64.1%5.25%	71.3%2.60%	76.5%1.20%		81.0%0.62%	52.5%13.72%	73.4%1.27%	61.6%5.92%	70.2%2.22%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds	53.5%0.04%	32.6%0.23%	36.4%0.09%	47.1%0.02%	40.2%0.09%	36.3%0.24%	37.2%0.11%	57.1%0.05%	19.0%0.62%		25.5%0.51%	43.2%0.04%	28.6%0.28%	38.1%0.10%
Richmond Kickers	72.5%0.75%	61.3%4.73%	69.6%1.86%	82.8%0.47%	65.8%2.40%	60.6%4.66%	68.8%2.42%	75.8%1.06%	47.5%13.72%	74.5%0.51%		70.7%1.07%	58.9%5.31%	68.9%1.92%
Rochester Rhinos	52.6%0.08%	40.9%0.46%	50.3%0.16%	64.3%0.04%	46.0%0.24%	38.1%0.47%	45.0%0.22%	62.2%0.10%	26.6%1.27%	56.8%0.04%	29.3%1.07%		37.3%0.54%	35.3%0.15%
Sacramento Republic	67.6%0.34%	52.4%2.23%	61.6%0.97%	71.0%0.22%	58.5%1.16%	53.9%2.18%	61.3%1.16%	63.6%0.49%	38.4%5.92%	71.4%0.28%	41.1%5.31%	62.7%0.54%		58.1%0.92%
Wilmington Hammerheads	60.5%0.12%	44.4%0.88%	57.2%0.30%	60.5%0.09%	49.9%0.43%	45.6%0.83%	49.9%0.41%	62.9%0.23%	29.8%2.22%	61.9%0.10%	31.1%1.92%	64.7%0.15%	41.9%0.92%

Actual Bracket Simulation

Team	Advanced to Conference Finals	Advanced to USL Championship	Won USL Championship
Orlando City SC	71.33%	42.75%	28.59%
Richmond Kickers	64.79%	32.78%	21.03%
Sacramento Republic	62.76%	37.98%	16.54%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	63.97%	31.43%	12.38%
Charleston Battery	35.21%	14.49%	7.18%
Wilmington Hammerheads	37.24%	16.29%	5.61%
Harrisburg City Islanders	28.67%	9.98%	4.41%
Rochester Rhinos	36.03%	14.30%	4.25%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Charleston Battery	Harrisburg City Islanders	Los Angeles Galaxy II	Orlando City SC	Richmond Kickers	Rochester Rhinos	Sacramento Republic	Wilmington Hammerheads
Charleston Battery					35.2%100.00%
Harrisburg City Islanders				28.7%100.00%
Los Angeles Galaxy II						64.0%100.00%
Orlando City SC		71.3%100.00%
Richmond Kickers	64.8%100.00%
Rochester Rhinos			36.0%100.00%
Sacramento Republic								62.8%100.00%
Wilmington Hammerheads							37.2%100.00%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Charleston Battery	Harrisburg City Islanders	Los Angeles Galaxy II	Orlando City SC	Richmond Kickers	Rochester Rhinos	Sacramento Republic	Wilmington Hammerheads
Charleston Battery		59.0%10.15%		33.9%25.06%
Harrisburg City Islanders	41.0%10.15%				31.4%18.52%
Los Angeles Galaxy II							42.7%40.09%	59.9%23.89%
Orlando City SC	66.1%25.06%				56.6%46.27%
Richmond Kickers		68.6%18.52%		43.4%46.27%
Rochester Rhinos							33.7%22.67%	49.8%13.36%
Sacramento Republic			57.3%40.09%			66.3%22.67%
Wilmington Hammerheads			40.1%23.89%			50.2%13.36%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Charleston Battery	Harrisburg City Islanders	Los Angeles Galaxy II	Orlando City SC	Richmond Kickers	Rochester Rhinos	Sacramento Republic	Wilmington Hammerheads
Charleston Battery			46.6%4.49%			63.7%2.09%	43.6%5.47%	56.4%2.44%
Harrisburg City Islanders			42.0%3.10%			56.4%1.41%	40.6%3.84%	46.2%1.64%
Los Angeles Galaxy II	53.4%4.49%	58.0%3.10%		34.0%13.44%	34.8%10.40%
Orlando City SC			66.0%13.44%			74.3%6.21%	63.4%16.20%	70.1%6.89%
Richmond Kickers			65.2%10.40%			72.0%4.58%	57.9%12.47%	69.7%5.33%
Rochester Rhinos	36.3%2.09%	43.6%1.41%		25.7%6.21%	28.0%4.58%
Sacramento Republic	56.4%5.47%	59.4%3.84%		36.6%16.20%	42.1%12.47%
Wilmington Hammerheads	43.6%2.44%	53.8%1.64%		29.9%6.89%	30.3%5.33%

Most-Likely Championship Paths

For each playoff team, what was the most likely path they had to the championship across all simulations? Tiles represent the opponent they faced and defeated the most often in each round.

Orlando City SC 28.59% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Harrisburg City Islanders

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

71.33%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Richmond Kickers

Matchup

61.26%

Win Prob

56.60%

→

USL Championship

vs. Sacramento Republic

Matchup

35.93%

Win Prob

63.40%

Richmond Kickers 21.03% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Charleston Battery

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

64.79%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Orlando City SC

Matchup

61.25%

Win Prob

43.40%

→

USL Championship

vs. Sacramento Republic

Matchup

34.37%

Win Prob

57.94%

Sacramento Republic 16.54% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Wilmington Hammerheads

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

62.76%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Los Angeles Galaxy II

Matchup

60.45%

Win Prob

57.28%

→

USL Championship

vs. Orlando City SC

Matchup

35.84%

Win Prob

36.60%

Los Angeles Galaxy II 12.38% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Rochester Rhinos

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

63.97%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Sacramento Republic

Matchup

54.49%

Win Prob

42.72%

→

USL Championship

vs. Orlando City SC

Matchup

36.91%

Win Prob

34.02%

Charleston Battery 7.18% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Richmond Kickers

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

35.21%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Orlando City SC

Matchup

58.68%

Win Prob

33.93%

→

USL Championship

vs. Sacramento Republic

Matchup

33.19%

Win Prob

43.58%

Wilmington Hammerheads 5.61% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Sacramento Republic

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

37.24%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Los Angeles Galaxy II

Matchup

58.83%

Win Prob

40.12%

→

USL Championship

vs. Orlando City SC

Matchup

36.66%

Win Prob

29.86%

Harrisburg City Islanders 4.41% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Orlando City SC

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

28.67%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Richmond Kickers

Matchup

58.32%

Win Prob

31.43%

→

USL Championship

vs. Sacramento Republic

Matchup

35.32%

Win Prob

40.57%

Rochester Rhinos 4.25% chance to win

Conference Semifinals

vs. Los Angeles Galaxy II

Matchup

100.00%

Win Prob

36.03%

→

Conference Finals

vs. Sacramento Republic

Matchup

53.50%

Win Prob

33.74%

→

USL Championship

vs. Orlando City SC

Matchup

37.57%

Win Prob

25.71%

Regular Season Games

Summary of every regular-season game played this season.

Filter by Team:

Date	Opponent	Score	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Elo Δ	Points
2014-04-13	OKC Energy FC	L 0-4	1459.23	1503.48	36.17%	23.28%	40.55%	-17.15	0
2014-04-20	Sacramento Republic	W 2-1	1442.08	1511.39	32.84%	23.04%	44.12%	+5.28	3
2014-04-26	Los Angeles Galaxy II	T 1-1	1447.36	1506.04	34.22%	23.17%	42.61%	+0.22	4
2014-05-04	Charlotte Eagles	W 2-1	1447.58	1503.54	34.58%	23.19%	42.23%	+5.09	7
2014-05-10	@ Richmond Kickers	L 0-4	1452.67	1563.24	22.27%	20.30%	57.43%	-11.10	7
2014-05-11	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	W 1-0	1441.57	1480.90	29.46%	22.54%	48.00%	+5.99	10
2014-05-18	Orlando City SC	L 0-1	1447.56	1590.17	24.63%	21.24%	54.13%	-3.43	10
2014-06-01	@ Orange County Blues FC	L 0-2	1444.13	1476.04	30.33%	22.70%	46.97%	-7.82	10
2014-06-08	@ Sacramento Republic	T 1-1	1436.31	1518.72	24.87%	21.33%	53.80%	+0.80	11
2014-06-12	Dayton Dutch Lions	L 1-2	1437.11	1435.55	42.70%	23.16%	34.14%	-5.14	11
2014-06-15	Rochester Rhinos	W 1-0	1431.97	1468.82	37.20%	23.31%	39.49%	+5.13	14
2014-06-22	Los Angeles Galaxy II	T 1-1	1437.10	1528.92	30.07%	22.65%	47.27%	+0.46	15
2014-06-27	@ Sacramento Republic	L 0-1	1437.56	1508.10	26.06%	21.71%	52.23%	-3.62	15
2014-06-29	Orange County Blues FC	L 2-3	1433.94	1486.02	35.10%	23.22%	41.67%	-4.18	15
2014-07-05	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 2-4	1429.76	1519.25	24.19%	21.08%	54.73%	-4.92	15
2014-07-13	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 2-1	1424.84	1486.04	27.03%	21.99%	50.98%	+5.92	18
2014-07-18	@ OKC Energy FC	T 1-1	1430.76	1501.88	26.00%	21.69%	52.31%	+0.73	19
2014-07-20	Orange County Blues FC	W 3-0	1431.49	1480.11	35.57%	23.25%	41.18%	+14.51	22
2014-07-26	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	T 0-0	1446.00	1505.24	27.24%	22.04%	50.71%	+0.72	23
2014-07-27	@ Charleston Battery	L 0-2	1446.72	1509.36	26.88%	21.95%	51.17%	-7.02	23
2014-08-03	Sacramento Republic	L 1-2	1439.70	1525.18	30.83%	22.78%	46.39%	-3.96	23
2014-08-10	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 2-3	1435.74	1526.60	24.06%	21.04%	54.90%	-3.00	23
2014-08-15	@ OKC Energy FC	W 2-1	1432.74	1507.97	25.58%	21.56%	52.85%	+6.10	26
2014-08-17	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 3-1	1438.84	1435.99	42.88%	23.15%	33.97%	+7.45	29
2014-08-23	OKC Energy FC	W 1-0	1446.29	1496.83	35.31%	23.24%	41.45%	+5.32	32
2014-09-07	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 2-1	1451.61	1422.86	38.33%	23.32%	38.36%	+4.73	35
2014-03-23	Orlando City SC	T 1-1	1528.50	1568.94	36.70%	23.29%	40.01%	+0.09	1
2014-03-30	Richmond Kickers	T 2-2	1528.59	1551.11	39.25%	23.31%	37.44%	-0.04	2
2014-04-13	@ Orlando City SC	L 0-1	1528.55	1572.98	28.88%	22.42%	48.70%	-3.97	2
2014-04-27	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	T 0-0	1524.58	1454.61	44.21%	23.03%	32.76%	-0.34	3
2014-04-27	@ Rochester Rhinos	L 0-1	1524.24	1453.63	44.30%	23.02%	32.67%	-5.62	3
2014-05-03	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	W 4-0	1518.62	1499.34	36.98%	23.30%	39.72%	+18.44	6
2014-05-05	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 2-0	1537.06	1473.16	43.35%	23.11%	33.54%	+8.51	9
2014-05-11	Wilmington Hammerheads	L 0-1	1545.57	1476.17	52.08%	21.75%	26.18%	-6.40	9
2014-05-18	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	L 0-1	1539.17	1482.57	42.32%	23.19%	34.50%	-5.42	9
2014-05-25	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 1-0	1533.75	1434.15	56.03%	20.72%	23.25%	+3.25	12
2014-06-01	@ Orlando City SC	L 0-2	1537.00	1599.10	26.94%	21.96%	51.10%	-7.04	12
2014-06-15	Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 3-0	1529.96	1541.99	40.76%	23.27%	35.97%	+13.07	15
2014-06-22	@ Charlotte Eagles	L 1-3	1543.03	1481.45	43.02%	23.13%	33.84%	-8.96	15
2014-07-06	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	L 1-4	1534.07	1481.58	41.73%	23.22%	35.05%	-12.37	15
2014-07-13	Charlotte Eagles	T 0-0	1521.70	1485.30	47.59%	22.61%	29.80%	-0.54	16
2014-07-20	@ Richmond Kickers	L 0-4	1521.16	1603.77	24.85%	21.32%	53.83%	-12.37	16
2014-07-23	Richmond Kickers	T 1-1	1508.79	1616.15	28.29%	22.30%	49.41%	+0.57	17
2014-07-27	Arizona United SC	W 2-0	1509.36	1446.72	51.17%	21.95%	26.88%	+7.03	20
2014-08-02	@ Rochester Rhinos	T 0-0	1516.39	1459.36	42.38%	23.18%	34.44%	-0.24	21
2014-08-09	Dayton Dutch Lions	T 2-2	1516.15	1409.28	56.96%	20.44%	22.60%	-0.72	22
2014-08-14	Orange County Blues FC	W 3-2	1515.43	1446.56	52.01%	21.76%	26.23%	+3.26	25
2014-08-16	Rochester Rhinos	W 2-1	1518.69	1453.89	51.46%	21.88%	26.66%	+3.48	28
2014-08-25	@ OKC Energy FC	W 2-0	1522.17	1491.50	38.60%	23.32%	38.08%	+9.41	31
2014-08-28	@ Sacramento Republic	L 1-3	1531.58	1555.33	31.32%	22.85%	45.83%	-6.96	31
2014-08-31	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 4-0	1524.62	1434.90	54.76%	21.08%	24.17%	+12.05	34
2014-09-06	Harrisburg City Islanders	W 2-1	1536.67	1496.54	48.10%	22.52%	29.37%	+3.80	37
2014-04-05	Dayton Dutch Lions	L 0-1	1493.91	1475.46	45.09%	22.94%	31.97%	-5.69	0
2014-04-13	Richmond Kickers	W 2-1	1488.22	1556.69	32.95%	23.05%	44.00%	+5.26	3
2014-04-27	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	W 2-0	1493.48	1486.60	35.27%	23.23%	41.50%	+10.06	6
2014-05-04	@ Arizona United SC	L 1-2	1503.54	1447.58	42.23%	23.19%	34.58%	-5.10	6
2014-05-06	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 1-2	1498.44	1520.41	31.54%	22.88%	45.58%	-4.04	6
2014-05-09	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 2-0	1494.40	1479.88	36.32%	23.28%	40.40%	+9.85	9
2014-05-22	@ Orlando City SC	L 1-3	1504.25	1593.60	24.20%	21.09%	54.71%	-5.51	9
2014-05-25	@ Richmond Kickers	L 0-2	1498.74	1584.56	24.54%	21.21%	54.25%	-6.44	9
2014-06-01	Wilmington Hammerheads	L 1-2	1492.30	1499.94	41.39%	23.24%	35.37%	-5.02	9
2014-06-08	OKC Energy FC	T 1-1	1487.28	1475.67	44.12%	23.04%	32.84%	-0.30	10
2014-06-14	Orange County Blues FC	L 0-1	1486.98	1480.50	43.40%	23.10%	33.50%	-5.53	10
2014-06-22	Charleston Battery	W 3-1	1481.45	1543.03	33.84%	23.13%	43.02%	+8.96	13
2014-06-28	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	T 1-1	1490.41	1481.73	35.52%	23.25%	41.24%	+0.15	14
2014-06-29	@ Rochester Rhinos	W 1-0	1490.56	1472.10	36.87%	23.30%	39.84%	+5.17	17
2014-07-06	Dayton Dutch Lions	L 1-3	1495.73	1427.14	51.97%	21.77%	26.26%	-10.43	17
2014-07-13	@ Charleston Battery	T 0-0	1485.30	1521.70	29.80%	22.61%	47.59%	+0.54	18
2014-07-15	Sacramento Republic	L 0-1	1485.84	1503.39	39.97%	23.29%	36.74%	-5.18	18
2014-07-18	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	L 0-2	1480.66	1426.68	41.94%	23.21%	34.85%	-10.14	18
2014-07-20	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 2-1	1470.52	1430.03	40.01%	23.29%	36.69%	+4.57	21
2014-07-27	Wilmington Hammerheads	W 2-0	1475.09	1504.52	38.26%	23.32%	38.42%	+9.47	24
2014-08-03	@ Orlando City SC	L 1-4	1484.56	1625.59	19.78%	19.02%	61.21%	-6.33	24
2014-08-10	@ Richmond Kickers	L 1-2	1478.23	1624.47	19.38%	18.79%	61.84%	-2.53	24
2014-08-17	Rochester Rhinos	W 3-1	1475.70	1450.41	46.05%	22.82%	31.13%	+6.93	27
2014-08-21	Orlando City SC	W 2-0	1482.63	1631.36	24.05%	21.03%	54.92%	+12.59	30
2014-08-30	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	L 0-1	1495.22	1428.54	51.71%	21.83%	26.46%	-6.36	30
2014-09-07	Harrisburg City Islanders	L 2-4	1488.86	1492.74	41.92%	23.21%	34.87%	-7.85	30
2014-04-05	@ Charlotte Eagles	W 1-0	1475.46	1493.91	31.97%	22.94%	45.09%	+5.70	3
2014-04-12	Rochester Rhinos	T 1-1	1481.16	1453.21	46.42%	22.78%	30.81%	-0.42	4
2014-04-20	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	W 1-0	1480.74	1511.14	30.51%	22.73%	46.76%	+5.86	7
2014-04-27	Richmond Kickers	L 1-5	1486.60	1550.76	33.50%	23.11%	43.39%	-13.44	7
2014-05-05	Charleston Battery	L 0-2	1473.16	1537.06	33.54%	23.11%	43.35%	-8.51	7
2014-05-11	Los Angeles Galaxy II	T 1-1	1464.65	1524.45	34.07%	23.15%	42.77%	+0.23	8
2014-05-17	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	L 3-5	1464.88	1474.92	33.04%	23.06%	43.90%	-6.15	8
2014-05-26	Sacramento Republic	L 1-2	1458.73	1514.35	34.63%	23.19%	42.18%	-4.36	8
2014-06-02	Rochester Rhinos	L 0-1	1454.37	1462.59	41.30%	23.24%	35.45%	-5.31	8
2014-06-08	@ Orange County Blues FC	L 3-4	1449.06	1483.86	29.99%	22.64%	47.37%	-3.59	8
2014-06-09	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 1-5	1445.47	1538.30	23.88%	20.97%	55.16%	-9.92	8
2014-06-12	@ Arizona United SC	W 2-1	1435.55	1437.11	34.14%	23.16%	42.70%	+5.14	11
2014-06-21	@ Rochester Rhinos	L 0-2	1440.69	1463.69	31.41%	22.86%	45.72%	-8.05	11
2014-06-22	Orlando City SC	L 0-2	1432.64	1613.08	21.24%	19.80%	58.96%	-5.58	11
2014-06-29	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 1-0	1427.06	1423.98	34.76%	23.20%	42.04%	+5.39	14
2014-07-03	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	L 1-2	1432.45	1418.59	44.44%	23.01%	32.55%	-5.31	14
2014-07-06	@ Charlotte Eagles	W 3-1	1427.14	1495.73	26.26%	21.77%	51.97%	+10.43	17
2014-07-13	Harrisburg City Islanders	L 1-3	1437.57	1493.95	34.53%	23.19%	42.29%	-7.54	17
2014-07-20	Charlotte Eagles	L 1-2	1430.03	1470.52	36.69%	23.29%	40.01%	-4.57	17
2014-07-27	OKC Energy FC	L 0-3	1425.46	1496.21	32.66%	23.02%	44.32%	-12.09	17
2014-08-03	Harrisburg City Islanders	L 0-1	1413.37	1506.82	29.88%	22.62%	47.50%	-4.09	17
2014-08-09	@ Charleston Battery	T 2-2	1409.28	1516.15	22.60%	20.44%	56.96%	+0.72	18
2014-08-10	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	W 2-1	1410.00	1489.03	25.20%	21.44%	53.36%	+6.15	21
2014-08-17	@ Richmond Kickers	T 1-1	1416.15	1627.00	15.05%	15.73%	69.22%	+1.55	22
2014-09-01	@ Orlando City SC	L 0-7	1417.70	1612.92	16.00%	16.49%	67.51%	-13.13	22
2014-09-06	Wilmington Hammerheads	L 0-4	1404.57	1492.76	30.50%	22.73%	46.77%	-14.91	22
2014-04-06	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	T 0-0	1511.14	1482.16	38.36%	23.32%	38.32%	+0.00	1
2014-04-20	Dayton Dutch Lions	L 0-1	1511.14	1480.74	46.76%	22.73%	30.51%	-5.86	1
2014-04-25	@ Orange County Blues FC	L 1-4	1505.28	1487.36	36.79%	23.30%	39.92%	-11.22	1
2014-04-27	@ Sacramento Republic	W 2-1	1494.06	1506.12	32.78%	23.03%	44.19%	+5.28	4
2014-05-03	Charleston Battery	L 0-4	1499.34	1518.62	39.72%	23.30%	36.98%	-18.44	4
2014-05-11	Arizona United SC	L 0-1	1480.90	1441.57	48.00%	22.54%	29.46%	-5.98	4
2014-05-17	Dayton Dutch Lions	W 5-3	1474.92	1464.88	43.90%	23.06%	33.04%	+6.15	7
2014-06-01	Richmond Kickers	L 2-3	1481.07	1590.19	28.10%	22.25%	49.65%	-3.47	7
2014-06-02	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	T 1-1	1477.60	1430.91	40.90%	23.26%	35.84%	-0.13	8
2014-06-08	@ Richmond Kickers	L 0-1	1477.47	1593.66	21.79%	20.07%	58.14%	-3.04	8
2014-06-12	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 3-1	1474.43	1436.37	39.67%	23.30%	37.03%	+7.98	11
2014-06-15	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	T 0-0	1482.41	1428.40	50.00%	22.18%	27.81%	-0.68	12
2014-06-28	Charlotte Eagles	T 1-1	1481.73	1490.41	41.24%	23.25%	35.52%	-0.15	13
2014-07-06	Charleston Battery	W 4-1	1481.58	1534.07	35.05%	23.22%	41.73%	+12.37	16
2014-07-13	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 3-1	1493.95	1437.57	42.29%	23.19%	34.53%	+7.54	19
2014-07-19	Wilmington Hammerheads	T 0-0	1501.49	1500.18	42.66%	23.16%	34.18%	-0.25	20
2014-07-24	OKC Energy FC	T 3-3	1501.24	1496.06	43.21%	23.12%	33.67%	-0.16	21
2014-07-27	@ Richmond Kickers	L 1-2	1501.08	1615.57	21.93%	20.14%	57.93%	-2.88	21
2014-07-31	Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 3-1	1498.20	1545.42	35.76%	23.26%	40.98%	+8.62	24
2014-08-03	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 1-0	1506.82	1413.37	47.50%	22.62%	29.88%	+4.10	27
2014-08-10	Orlando City SC	W 3-2	1510.92	1631.92	26.81%	21.93%	51.26%	+5.64	30
2014-08-17	@ Orlando City SC	L 1-3	1516.56	1626.27	22.35%	20.33%	57.32%	-5.08	30
2014-08-24	@ Rochester Rhinos	T 2-2	1511.48	1443.49	43.93%	23.06%	33.01%	-0.22	31
2014-08-31	Rochester Rhinos	L 1-4	1511.26	1443.70	51.83%	21.80%	26.37%	-14.72	31
2014-09-06	@ Charleston Battery	L 1-2	1496.54	1536.67	29.37%	22.52%	48.10%	-3.80	31
2014-09-07	@ Charlotte Eagles	W 4-2	1492.74	1488.86	34.87%	23.21%	41.92%	+7.85	34
2014-03-23	Orange County Blues FC	W 3-1	1500.00	1508.28	41.30%	23.24%	35.46%	+7.71	3
2014-03-30	Sacramento Republic	T 1-1	1507.71	1500.00	43.57%	23.09%	33.34%	-0.28	4
2014-04-08	OKC Energy FC	W 4-2	1507.43	1510.26	42.07%	23.20%	34.72%	+6.78	7
2014-04-14	Sacramento Republic	L 0-3	1514.21	1495.80	45.08%	22.94%	31.98%	-15.59	7
2014-04-20	Orange County Blues FC	W 3-1	1498.62	1494.79	43.02%	23.14%	33.84%	+7.42	10
2014-04-26	@ Arizona United SC	T 1-1	1506.04	1447.36	42.61%	23.17%	34.22%	-0.22	11
2014-04-28	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 3-0	1505.82	1498.58	35.32%	23.24%	41.44%	+14.59	14
2014-05-06	Charlotte Eagles	W 2-1	1520.41	1498.44	45.58%	22.88%	31.54%	+4.04	17
2014-05-11	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	T 1-1	1524.45	1464.65	42.77%	23.15%	34.07%	-0.23	18
2014-05-18	@ Sacramento Republic	L 1-2	1524.22	1504.94	36.98%	23.30%	39.72%	-4.60	18
2014-05-26	OKC Energy FC	W 5-0	1519.62	1494.03	46.09%	22.82%	31.09%	+18.68	21
2014-06-09	Dayton Dutch Lions	W 5-1	1538.30	1445.47	55.16%	20.97%	23.88%	+9.92	24
2014-06-12	Rochester Rhinos	L 1-2	1548.22	1462.58	54.22%	21.22%	24.56%	-6.23	24
2014-06-15	@ Charleston Battery	L 0-3	1541.99	1529.96	35.97%	23.27%	40.76%	-13.07	24
2014-06-22	@ Arizona United SC	T 1-1	1528.92	1437.10	47.27%	22.65%	30.07%	-0.47	25
2014-06-29	@ Orlando City SC	L 0-3	1528.45	1618.65	24.12%	21.06%	54.82%	-9.20	25
2014-07-05	Arizona United SC	W 4-2	1519.25	1429.76	54.73%	21.08%	24.19%	+4.92	28
2014-07-20	@ OKC Energy FC	W 1-0	1524.17	1501.16	37.51%	23.31%	39.18%	+5.10	31
2014-07-27	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 4-0	1529.27	1465.59	43.32%	23.11%	33.57%	+16.15	34
2014-07-31	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	L 1-3	1545.42	1498.20	40.98%	23.26%	35.76%	-8.62	34
2014-08-03	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	L 1-3	1536.80	1420.98	50.56%	22.07%	27.37%	-10.20	34
2014-08-10	Arizona United SC	W 3-2	1526.60	1435.74	54.90%	21.04%	24.06%	+3.00	37
2014-08-17	@ OKC Energy FC	W 1-0	1529.60	1501.86	38.18%	23.32%	38.50%	+5.03	40
2014-08-24	Wilmington Hammerheads	T 3-3	1534.63	1480.40	50.03%	22.18%	27.79%	-0.38	41
2014-09-02	Richmond Kickers	T 1-1	1534.25	1619.34	30.88%	22.79%	46.34%	+0.42	42
2014-09-07	@ Sacramento Republic	W 2-1	1534.67	1565.44	30.47%	22.72%	46.81%	+5.53	45
2014-04-06	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 2-0	1500.00	1500.57	34.27%	23.17%	42.56%	+10.26	3
2014-04-08	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 2-4	1510.26	1507.43	34.72%	23.20%	42.07%	-6.78	3
2014-04-13	@ Arizona United SC	W 4-0	1503.48	1459.23	40.55%	23.28%	36.17%	+17.15	6
2014-04-27	Orlando City SC	L 1-2	1520.63	1576.96	34.53%	23.19%	42.28%	-4.36	6
2014-05-05	@ Orlando City SC	L 1-3	1516.27	1581.31	26.63%	21.88%	51.49%	-6.03	6
2014-05-11	Orange County Blues FC	L 0-1	1510.24	1470.04	48.12%	22.52%	29.36%	-6.00	6
2014-05-17	Richmond Kickers	L 1-4	1504.24	1574.35	32.74%	23.03%	44.23%	-10.21	6
2014-05-26	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 0-5	1494.03	1519.62	31.09%	22.82%	46.09%	-18.68	6
2014-06-07	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	T 2-2	1475.35	1504.95	30.61%	22.74%	46.65%	+0.32	7
2014-06-08	@ Charlotte Eagles	T 1-1	1475.67	1487.28	32.84%	23.04%	44.12%	+0.30	8
2014-06-15	Sacramento Republic	W 2-0	1475.97	1517.92	36.49%	23.29%	40.22%	+9.82	11
2014-06-23	Rochester Rhinos	T 0-0	1485.79	1471.74	44.47%	23.01%	32.53%	-0.36	12
2014-06-29	Sacramento Republic	W 2-0	1485.43	1511.72	38.71%	23.32%	37.97%	+9.39	15
2014-07-13	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 2-0	1494.82	1433.74	50.96%	21.99%	27.05%	+7.06	18
2014-07-18	Arizona United SC	T 1-1	1501.88	1430.76	52.31%	21.69%	26.00%	-0.72	19
2014-07-20	Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 0-1	1501.16	1524.17	39.18%	23.31%	37.51%	-5.10	19
2014-07-24	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	T 3-3	1496.06	1501.24	33.67%	23.12%	43.21%	+0.15	20
2014-07-27	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 3-0	1496.21	1425.46	44.32%	23.02%	32.66%	+12.09	23
2014-08-03	Orange County Blues FC	W 1-0	1508.30	1449.44	50.66%	22.05%	27.29%	+3.78	26
2014-08-10	@ Sacramento Republic	L 1-2	1512.08	1529.15	32.15%	22.96%	44.89%	-4.11	26
2014-08-15	Arizona United SC	L 1-2	1507.97	1432.74	52.85%	21.56%	25.58%	-6.11	26
2014-08-17	Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 0-1	1501.86	1529.60	38.50%	23.32%	38.18%	-5.03	26
2014-08-23	@ Arizona United SC	L 0-1	1496.83	1446.29	41.45%	23.24%	35.31%	-5.33	26
2014-08-25	Charleston Battery	L 0-2	1491.50	1522.17	38.08%	23.32%	38.60%	-9.40	26
2014-09-05	@ Sacramento Republic	L 0-1	1482.10	1561.94	25.12%	21.41%	53.46%	-3.50	26
2014-09-07	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 1-0	1478.60	1424.87	41.91%	23.21%	34.88%	+4.66	29
2014-03-23	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 1-3	1508.28	1500.00	35.46%	23.24%	41.30%	-7.71	0
2014-04-06	OKC Energy FC	L 0-2	1500.57	1500.00	42.56%	23.17%	34.27%	-10.26	0
2014-04-13	Sacramento Republic	W 2-1	1490.31	1500.27	41.06%	23.26%	35.69%	+4.48	3
2014-04-20	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 1-3	1494.79	1498.62	33.84%	23.14%	43.02%	-7.43	3
2014-04-25	Harrisburg City Islanders	W 4-1	1487.36	1505.28	39.92%	23.30%	36.79%	+11.22	6
2014-04-28	Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 0-3	1498.58	1505.82	41.44%	23.24%	35.32%	-14.59	6
2014-05-04	@ Sacramento Republic	L 1-2	1483.99	1500.83	32.18%	22.96%	44.86%	-4.11	6
2014-05-09	Charlotte Eagles	L 0-2	1479.88	1494.40	40.40%	23.28%	36.32%	-9.84	6
2014-05-11	@ OKC Energy FC	W 1-0	1470.04	1510.24	29.36%	22.52%	48.12%	+6.00	9
2014-06-01	Arizona United SC	W 2-0	1476.04	1444.13	46.97%	22.70%	30.33%	+7.82	12
2014-06-08	Dayton Dutch Lions	W 4-3	1483.86	1449.06	47.37%	22.64%	29.99%	+3.58	15
2014-06-12	@ Orlando City SC	L 1-4	1487.44	1606.14	21.58%	19.97%	58.46%	-6.94	15
2014-06-14	@ Charlotte Eagles	W 1-0	1480.50	1486.98	33.50%	23.10%	43.40%	+5.52	18
2014-06-29	@ Arizona United SC	W 3-2	1486.02	1433.94	41.67%	23.22%	35.10%	+4.19	21
2014-07-08	@ Sacramento Republic	L 1-2	1490.21	1502.33	32.77%	23.03%	44.20%	-4.17	21
2014-07-13	Arizona United SC	L 1-2	1486.04	1424.84	50.98%	21.99%	27.03%	-5.93	21
2014-07-20	@ Arizona United SC	L 0-3	1480.11	1431.49	41.18%	23.25%	35.57%	-14.52	21
2014-07-27	Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 0-4	1465.59	1529.27	33.57%	23.11%	43.32%	-16.15	21
2014-08-03	@ OKC Energy FC	L 0-1	1449.44	1508.30	27.29%	22.05%	50.66%	-3.77	21
2014-08-09	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	L 0-1	1445.67	1431.18	36.31%	23.28%	40.41%	-4.81	21
2014-08-11	@ Rochester Rhinos	W 1-0	1440.86	1459.59	31.94%	22.93%	45.13%	+5.70	24
2014-08-14	@ Charleston Battery	L 2-3	1446.56	1515.43	26.23%	21.76%	52.01%	-3.26	24
2014-08-18	Sacramento Republic	L 1-6	1443.30	1533.26	30.29%	22.69%	47.01%	-15.12	24
2014-08-24	Wilmington Hammerheads	L 1-2	1428.18	1475.93	35.69%	23.26%	41.05%	-4.48	24
2014-08-31	Richmond Kickers	T 1-1	1423.70	1620.51	19.93%	19.10%	60.97%	+1.17	25
2014-09-07	OKC Energy FC	L 0-1	1424.87	1478.60	34.88%	23.21%	41.91%	-4.66	25
2014-03-23	@ Charleston Battery	T 1-1	1568.94	1528.50	40.01%	23.29%	36.70%	-0.09	1
2014-03-30	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	T 1-1	1568.85	1462.98	56.84%	20.48%	22.69%	-0.96	2
2014-04-06	Rochester Rhinos	W 3-1	1567.89	1458.30	57.31%	20.33%	22.36%	+5.09	5
2014-04-13	Charleston Battery	W 1-0	1572.98	1528.55	48.70%	22.42%	28.88%	+3.98	8
2014-04-27	@ OKC Energy FC	W 2-1	1576.96	1520.63	42.28%	23.19%	34.53%	+4.35	11
2014-05-05	OKC Energy FC	W 3-1	1581.31	1516.27	51.49%	21.88%	26.63%	+6.03	14
2014-05-10	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 1-0	1587.34	1454.95	52.78%	21.58%	25.64%	+3.56	17
2014-05-11	@ Rochester Rhinos	T 1-1	1590.90	1460.57	52.51%	21.65%	25.85%	-0.73	18
2014-05-18	@ Arizona United SC	W 1-0	1590.17	1447.56	54.13%	21.24%	24.63%	+3.43	21
2014-05-22	Charlotte Eagles	W 3-1	1593.60	1504.25	54.71%	21.09%	24.20%	+5.50	24
2014-06-01	Charleston Battery	W 2-0	1599.10	1537.00	51.10%	21.96%	26.94%	+7.04	27
2014-06-12	Orange County Blues FC	W 4-1	1606.14	1487.44	58.46%	19.97%	21.58%	+6.94	30
2014-06-22	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 2-0	1613.08	1432.64	58.96%	19.80%	21.24%	+5.57	33
2014-06-29	Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 3-0	1618.65	1528.45	54.82%	21.06%	24.12%	+9.21	36
2014-07-13	Wilmington Hammerheads	W 2-0	1627.86	1505.77	58.88%	19.83%	21.29%	+5.59	39
2014-07-18	@ Sacramento Republic	T 0-0	1633.45	1508.57	51.78%	21.81%	26.41%	-0.78	40
2014-07-27	@ Rochester Rhinos	L 0-1	1632.67	1452.28	58.95%	19.81%	21.24%	-7.08	40
2014-08-03	Charlotte Eagles	W 4-1	1625.59	1484.56	61.21%	19.02%	19.78%	+6.33	43
2014-08-10	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	L 2-3	1631.92	1510.92	51.26%	21.93%	26.81%	-5.65	43
2014-08-17	Harrisburg City Islanders	W 3-1	1626.27	1516.56	57.32%	20.33%	22.35%	+5.09	46
2014-08-21	@ Charlotte Eagles	L 0-2	1631.36	1482.63	54.92%	21.03%	24.05%	-12.60	46
2014-08-24	@ Richmond Kickers	W 3-2	1618.76	1625.45	33.47%	23.10%	43.43%	+4.95	49
2014-08-29	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	L 1-3	1623.71	1480.78	54.17%	21.23%	24.60%	-10.79	49
2014-09-01	Dayton Dutch Lions	W 7-0	1612.92	1417.70	67.51%	16.49%	16.00%	+13.13	52
2014-09-04	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	T 0-0	1626.05	1491.91	53.01%	21.53%	25.46%	-0.85	53
2014-09-07	Richmond Kickers	W 1-0	1625.20	1618.93	43.37%	23.11%	33.53%	+4.51	56
2014-03-30	@ Orlando City SC	T 1-1	1462.98	1568.85	22.69%	20.48%	56.84%	+0.95	1
2014-04-06	@ Richmond Kickers	L 1-3	1463.93	1551.14	24.41%	21.16%	54.43%	-5.55	1
2014-04-13	Wilmington Hammerheads	L 3-4	1458.38	1482.16	39.07%	23.31%	37.62%	-4.44	1
2014-04-20	@ Richmond Kickers	T 2-2	1453.94	1551.43	23.44%	20.80%	55.76%	+0.67	2
2014-04-27	Charleston Battery	T 0-0	1454.61	1524.58	32.76%	23.03%	44.21%	+0.34	3
2014-05-10	Orlando City SC	L 0-1	1454.95	1587.34	25.64%	21.58%	52.78%	-3.56	3
2014-05-18	Rochester Rhinos	L 0-1	1451.39	1461.30	41.06%	23.26%	35.68%	-5.29	3
2014-05-24	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	L 1-5	1446.10	1487.99	29.17%	22.48%	48.35%	-11.95	3
2014-05-25	@ Charleston Battery	L 0-1	1434.15	1533.75	23.25%	20.72%	56.03%	-3.24	3
2014-06-02	Harrisburg City Islanders	T 1-1	1430.91	1477.60	35.84%	23.26%	40.90%	+0.13	4
2014-06-08	@ Rochester Rhinos	W 3-2	1431.04	1467.91	29.75%	22.60%	47.65%	+5.33	7
2014-06-12	Harrisburg City Islanders	L 1-3	1436.37	1474.43	37.03%	23.30%	39.67%	-7.97	7
2014-06-15	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	T 0-0	1428.40	1482.41	27.81%	22.18%	50.00%	+0.67	8
2014-06-22	Richmond Kickers	L 1-3	1429.07	1596.05	22.39%	20.35%	57.27%	-5.09	8
2014-06-29	Dayton Dutch Lions	L 0-1	1423.98	1427.06	42.04%	23.20%	34.76%	-5.39	8
2014-07-03	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 2-1	1418.59	1432.45	32.55%	23.01%	44.44%	+5.31	11
2014-07-05	Rochester Rhinos	W 2-0	1423.90	1466.93	36.34%	23.28%	40.38%	+9.84	14
2014-07-13	@ OKC Energy FC	L 0-2	1433.74	1494.82	27.05%	21.99%	50.96%	-7.06	14
2014-07-18	Charlotte Eagles	W 2-0	1426.68	1480.66	34.85%	23.21%	41.94%	+10.14	17
2014-07-28	@ Sacramento Republic	L 0-5	1436.82	1509.35	25.86%	21.65%	52.49%	-15.84	17
2014-08-03	Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 3-1	1420.98	1536.80	27.37%	22.07%	50.56%	+10.20	20
2014-08-09	Orange County Blues FC	W 1-0	1431.18	1445.67	40.41%	23.28%	36.31%	+4.81	23
2014-08-17	@ Arizona United SC	L 1-3	1435.99	1438.84	33.97%	23.15%	42.88%	-7.45	23
2014-08-30	@ Charlotte Eagles	W 1-0	1428.54	1495.22	26.46%	21.83%	51.71%	+6.36	26
2014-08-31	@ Charleston Battery	L 0-4	1434.90	1524.62	24.17%	21.08%	54.76%	-12.04	26
2014-09-07	Arizona United SC	L 1-2	1422.86	1451.61	38.36%	23.32%	38.33%	-4.73	26
2014-03-30	@ Charleston Battery	T 2-2	1551.11	1528.59	37.44%	23.31%	39.25%	+0.03	1
2014-04-06	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 3-1	1551.14	1463.93	54.43%	21.16%	24.41%	+5.55	4
2014-04-13	@ Charlotte Eagles	L 1-2	1556.69	1488.22	44.00%	23.05%	32.95%	-5.26	4
2014-04-20	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	T 2-2	1551.43	1453.94	55.76%	20.80%	23.44%	-0.67	5
2014-04-27	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 5-1	1550.76	1486.60	43.39%	23.11%	33.50%	+13.44	8
2014-05-03	Rochester Rhinos	T 1-1	1564.20	1459.24	56.72%	20.51%	22.77%	-0.96	9
2014-05-10	Arizona United SC	W 4-0	1563.24	1452.67	57.43%	20.30%	22.27%	+11.11	12
2014-05-17	@ OKC Energy FC	W 4-1	1574.35	1504.24	44.23%	23.03%	32.74%	+10.21	15
2014-05-25	Charlotte Eagles	W 2-0	1584.56	1498.74	54.25%	21.21%	24.54%	+6.45	18
2014-05-31	@ Rochester Rhinos	T 0-0	1591.01	1461.78	52.36%	21.68%	25.96%	-0.82	19
2014-06-01	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	W 3-2	1590.19	1481.07	49.65%	22.25%	28.10%	+3.47	22
2014-06-08	Harrisburg City Islanders	W 1-0	1593.66	1477.47	58.14%	20.07%	21.79%	+3.04	25
2014-06-15	Wilmington Hammerheads	T 2-2	1596.70	1504.63	55.06%	20.99%	23.95%	-0.65	26
2014-06-22	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 3-1	1596.05	1429.07	57.27%	20.35%	22.39%	+5.10	29
2014-06-29	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	T 1-1	1601.15	1505.28	47.83%	22.57%	29.60%	-0.50	30
2014-07-13	Sacramento Republic	W 2-1	1600.65	1506.51	55.33%	20.92%	23.75%	+3.12	33
2014-07-20	Charleston Battery	W 4-0	1603.77	1521.16	53.83%	21.32%	24.85%	+12.38	36
2014-07-23	@ Charleston Battery	T 1-1	1616.15	1508.79	49.41%	22.30%	28.29%	-0.58	37
2014-07-27	Harrisburg City Islanders	W 2-1	1615.57	1501.08	57.93%	20.14%	21.93%	+2.89	40
2014-08-02	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	W 3-1	1618.46	1495.05	51.58%	21.86%	26.56%	+6.01	43
2014-08-10	Charlotte Eagles	W 2-1	1624.47	1478.23	61.84%	18.79%	19.38%	+2.53	46
2014-08-17	Dayton Dutch Lions	T 1-1	1627.00	1416.15	69.22%	15.73%	15.05%	-1.55	47
2014-08-24	Orlando City SC	L 2-3	1625.45	1618.76	43.43%	23.10%	33.47%	-4.94	47
2014-08-31	@ Orange County Blues FC	T 1-1	1620.51	1423.70	60.97%	19.10%	19.93%	-1.17	48
2014-09-02	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	T 1-1	1619.34	1534.25	46.34%	22.79%	30.88%	-0.41	49
2014-09-07	@ Orlando City SC	L 0-1	1618.93	1625.20	33.53%	23.11%	43.37%	-4.51	49
2014-04-06	@ Orlando City SC	L 1-3	1458.30	1567.89	22.36%	20.33%	57.31%	-5.09	0
2014-04-12	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	T 1-1	1453.21	1481.16	30.81%	22.78%	46.42%	+0.42	1
2014-04-27	Charleston Battery	W 1-0	1453.63	1524.24	32.67%	23.02%	44.30%	+5.61	4
2014-05-03	@ Richmond Kickers	T 1-1	1459.24	1564.20	22.77%	20.51%	56.72%	+0.95	5
2014-05-04	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	T 0-0	1460.19	1476.55	32.24%	22.97%	44.79%	+0.38	6
2014-05-11	Orlando City SC	T 1-1	1460.57	1590.90	25.85%	21.65%	52.51%	+0.73	7
2014-05-18	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 1-0	1461.30	1451.39	35.68%	23.26%	41.06%	+5.29	10
2014-05-24	Sacramento Republic	L 0-1	1466.59	1509.54	36.35%	23.28%	40.37%	-4.81	10
2014-05-31	Richmond Kickers	T 0-0	1461.78	1591.01	25.96%	21.68%	52.36%	+0.81	11
2014-06-02	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 1-0	1462.59	1454.37	35.45%	23.24%	41.30%	+5.32	14
2014-06-08	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	L 2-3	1467.91	1431.04	47.65%	22.60%	29.75%	-5.33	14
2014-06-12	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 2-1	1462.58	1548.22	24.56%	21.22%	54.22%	+6.24	17
2014-06-15	@ Arizona United SC	L 0-1	1468.82	1431.97	39.49%	23.31%	37.20%	-5.13	17
2014-06-21	Dayton Dutch Lions	W 2-0	1463.69	1440.69	45.72%	22.86%	31.41%	+8.05	20
2014-06-23	@ OKC Energy FC	T 0-0	1471.74	1485.79	32.53%	23.01%	44.47%	+0.36	21
2014-06-29	Charlotte Eagles	L 0-1	1472.10	1490.56	39.84%	23.30%	36.87%	-5.17	21
2014-07-05	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	L 0-2	1466.93	1423.90	40.38%	23.28%	36.34%	-9.84	21
2014-07-20	Wilmington Hammerheads	L 0-1	1457.09	1500.43	36.30%	23.28%	40.42%	-4.81	21
2014-07-27	Orlando City SC	W 1-0	1452.28	1632.67	21.24%	19.81%	58.95%	+7.08	24
2014-08-02	Charleston Battery	T 0-0	1459.36	1516.39	34.44%	23.18%	42.38%	+0.23	25
2014-08-11	Orange County Blues FC	L 0-1	1459.59	1440.86	45.13%	22.93%	31.94%	-5.70	25
2014-08-16	@ Charleston Battery	L 1-2	1453.89	1518.69	26.66%	21.88%	51.46%	-3.48	25
2014-08-17	@ Charlotte Eagles	L 1-3	1450.41	1475.70	31.13%	22.82%	46.05%	-6.92	25
2014-08-24	Harrisburg City Islanders	T 2-2	1443.49	1511.48	33.01%	23.06%	43.93%	+0.21	26
2014-08-31	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	W 4-1	1443.70	1511.26	26.37%	21.80%	51.83%	+14.72	29
2014-09-07	Wilmington Hammerheads	W 2-0	1458.42	1507.67	35.49%	23.25%	41.27%	+10.01	32
2014-03-30	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	T 1-1	1500.00	1507.71	33.34%	23.09%	43.57%	+0.27	1
2014-04-13	@ Orange County Blues FC	L 1-2	1500.27	1490.31	35.69%	23.26%	41.06%	-4.47	1
2014-04-14	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 3-0	1495.80	1514.21	31.98%	22.94%	45.08%	+15.59	4
2014-04-20	@ Arizona United SC	L 1-2	1511.39	1442.08	44.12%	23.04%	32.84%	-5.27	4
2014-04-27	Harrisburg City Islanders	L 1-2	1506.12	1494.06	44.19%	23.03%	32.78%	-5.29	4
2014-05-04	Orange County Blues FC	W 2-1	1500.83	1483.99	44.86%	22.96%	32.18%	+4.11	7
2014-05-18	Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 2-1	1504.94	1524.22	39.72%	23.30%	36.98%	+4.60	10
2014-05-24	@ Rochester Rhinos	W 1-0	1509.54	1466.59	40.37%	23.28%	36.35%	+4.81	13
2014-05-26	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 2-1	1514.35	1458.73	42.18%	23.19%	34.63%	+4.37	16
2014-06-08	Arizona United SC	T 1-1	1518.72	1436.31	53.80%	21.33%	24.87%	-0.80	17
2014-06-15	@ OKC Energy FC	L 0-2	1517.92	1475.97	40.22%	23.29%	36.49%	-9.82	17
2014-06-27	Arizona United SC	W 1-0	1508.10	1437.56	52.23%	21.71%	26.06%	+3.62	20
2014-06-29	@ OKC Energy FC	L 0-2	1511.72	1485.43	37.97%	23.32%	38.71%	-9.39	20
2014-07-08	Orange County Blues FC	W 2-1	1502.33	1490.21	44.20%	23.03%	32.77%	+4.18	23
2014-07-13	@ Richmond Kickers	L 1-2	1506.51	1600.65	23.75%	20.92%	55.33%	-3.12	23
2014-07-15	@ Charlotte Eagles	W 1-0	1503.39	1485.84	36.74%	23.29%	39.97%	+5.18	26
2014-07-18	Orlando City SC	T 0-0	1508.57	1633.45	26.41%	21.81%	51.78%	+0.78	27
2014-07-28	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 5-0	1509.35	1436.82	52.49%	21.65%	25.86%	+15.83	30
2014-08-03	@ Arizona United SC	W 2-1	1525.18	1439.70	46.39%	22.78%	30.83%	+3.97	33
2014-08-10	OKC Energy FC	W 2-1	1529.15	1512.08	44.89%	22.96%	32.15%	+4.11	36
2014-08-18	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 6-1	1533.26	1443.30	47.01%	22.69%	30.29%	+15.12	39
2014-08-21	Wilmington Hammerheads	W 2-0	1548.38	1482.88	51.56%	21.86%	26.58%	+6.95	42
2014-08-28	Charleston Battery	W 3-1	1555.33	1531.58	45.83%	22.85%	31.32%	+6.96	45
2014-08-31	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	T 0-0	1562.29	1491.57	44.32%	23.02%	32.66%	-0.35	46
2014-09-05	OKC Energy FC	W 1-0	1561.94	1482.10	53.46%	21.41%	25.12%	+3.50	49
2014-09-07	Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 1-2	1565.44	1534.67	46.81%	22.72%	30.47%	-5.53	49
2014-04-06	Harrisburg City Islanders	T 0-0	1482.16	1511.14	38.32%	23.32%	38.36%	+0.00	1
2014-04-13	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 4-3	1482.16	1458.38	37.62%	23.31%	39.07%	+4.44	4
2014-04-27	Charlotte Eagles	L 0-2	1486.60	1493.48	41.50%	23.23%	35.27%	-10.05	4
2014-05-04	Rochester Rhinos	T 0-0	1476.55	1460.19	44.79%	22.97%	32.24%	-0.38	5
2014-05-11	@ Charleston Battery	W 1-0	1476.17	1545.57	26.18%	21.75%	52.08%	+6.40	8
2014-05-18	Charleston Battery	W 1-0	1482.57	1539.17	34.50%	23.19%	42.32%	+5.42	11
2014-05-24	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	W 5-1	1487.99	1446.10	48.35%	22.48%	29.17%	+11.95	14
2014-06-01	@ Charlotte Eagles	W 2-1	1499.94	1492.30	35.37%	23.24%	41.39%	+5.01	17
2014-06-07	OKC Energy FC	T 2-2	1504.95	1475.35	46.65%	22.74%	30.61%	-0.32	18
2014-06-15	@ Richmond Kickers	T 2-2	1504.63	1596.70	23.95%	20.99%	55.06%	+0.65	19
2014-06-29	Richmond Kickers	T 1-1	1505.28	1601.15	29.60%	22.57%	47.83%	+0.49	20
2014-07-13	@ Orlando City SC	L 0-2	1505.77	1627.86	21.29%	19.83%	58.88%	-5.59	20
2014-07-19	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	T 0-0	1500.18	1501.49	34.18%	23.16%	42.66%	+0.25	21
2014-07-20	@ Rochester Rhinos	W 1-0	1500.43	1457.09	40.42%	23.28%	36.30%	+4.81	24
2014-07-26	Arizona United SC	T 0-0	1505.24	1446.00	50.71%	22.04%	27.24%	-0.72	25
2014-07-27	@ Charlotte Eagles	L 0-2	1504.52	1475.09	38.42%	23.32%	38.26%	-9.47	25
2014-08-02	Richmond Kickers	L 1-3	1495.05	1618.46	26.56%	21.86%	51.58%	-6.02	25
2014-08-10	Dayton Dutch Lions	L 1-2	1489.03	1410.00	53.36%	21.44%	25.20%	-6.15	25
2014-08-21	@ Sacramento Republic	L 0-2	1482.88	1548.38	26.58%	21.86%	51.56%	-6.95	25
2014-08-24	@ Orange County Blues FC	W 2-1	1475.93	1428.18	41.05%	23.26%	35.69%	+4.47	28
2014-08-24	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	T 3-3	1480.40	1534.63	27.79%	22.18%	50.03%	+0.38	29
2014-08-29	Orlando City SC	W 3-1	1480.78	1623.71	24.60%	21.23%	54.17%	+10.79	32
2014-08-31	Sacramento Republic	T 0-0	1491.57	1562.29	32.66%	23.02%	44.32%	+0.34	33
2014-09-04	Orlando City SC	T 0-0	1491.91	1626.05	25.46%	21.53%	53.01%	+0.85	34
2014-09-06	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	W 4-0	1492.76	1404.57	46.77%	22.73%	30.50%	+14.91	37
2014-09-07	@ Rochester Rhinos	L 0-2	1507.67	1458.42	41.27%	23.25%	35.49%	-10.01	37

Playoff Games

Every playoff game from the selected team's perspective.

Date	Opponent	Score	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Elo Δ	Record
2014-09-13	@ Richmond Kickers	L 1-2	1540.47	1614.42	35.62%	0.00%	64.38%	-3.37	0-1
2014-09-13	@ Orlando City SC	W 1-0	1500.59	1629.71	28.71%	0.00%	71.29%	+7.15	1-0
2014-09-20	@ Richmond Kickers	W 3-2	1507.74	1617.79	31.01%	0.00%	68.99%	+6.19	2-0
2014-09-27	@ Sacramento Republic	L 0-2	1513.93	1572.32	37.70%	0.00%	62.30%	-7.13	2-1
2014-09-13	Rochester Rhinos	W 2-1	1540.20	1468.43	64.09%	0.00%	35.91%	+3.40	1-0
2014-09-20	@ Sacramento Republic	L 2-3	1543.60	1568.52	42.32%	0.00%	57.68%	-3.80	1-1
2014-09-13	Harrisburg City Islanders	L 0-1	1629.71	1500.59	71.29%	0.00%	28.71%	-7.15	0-1
2014-09-13	Charleston Battery	W 2-1	1614.42	1540.47	64.38%	0.00%	35.62%	+3.37	1-0
2014-09-20	Harrisburg City Islanders	L 2-3	1617.79	1507.74	68.99%	0.00%	31.01%	-6.19	1-1
2014-09-13	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	L 1-2	1468.43	1540.20	35.91%	0.00%	64.09%	-3.40	0-1
2014-09-13	Wilmington Hammerheads	W 4-1	1559.91	1497.66	62.82%	0.00%	37.18%	+8.61	1-0
2014-09-20	Los Angeles Galaxy II	W 3-2	1568.52	1543.60	57.68%	0.00%	42.32%	+3.80	2-0
2014-09-27	Harrisburg City Islanders	W 2-0	1572.32	1513.93	62.30%	0.00%	37.70%	+7.13	3-0
2014-09-13	@ Sacramento Republic	L 1-4	1497.66	1559.91	37.18%	0.00%	62.82%	-8.61	0-1

Biggest Upsets

The 25 biggest upsets of the seasons, ranked by lowest pregame win probability. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	2014-07-27	21.24%	@ Rochester Rhinos	1452.28	1	Orlando City SC	1632.67	0
2	2014-08-21	24.05%	@ Charlotte Eagles	1482.63	2	Orlando City SC	1631.36	0
3	2014-06-12	24.56%	Rochester Rhinos	1462.58	2	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	1548.22	1
4	2014-08-29	24.60%	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	1480.78	3	Orlando City SC	1623.71	1
5	2014-08-10	25.20%	Dayton Dutch Lions	1410.00	2	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	1489.03	1
6	2014-08-15	25.58%	Arizona United SC	1432.74	2	@ OKC Energy FC	1507.97	1
7	2014-05-11	26.18%	Wilmington Hammerheads	1476.17	1	@ Charleston Battery	1545.57	0
8	2014-07-06	26.26%	Dayton Dutch Lions	1427.14	3	@ Charlotte Eagles	1495.73	1
9	2014-08-31	26.37%	Rochester Rhinos	1443.70	4	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	1511.26	1
10	2014-08-30	26.46%	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	1428.54	1	@ Charlotte Eagles	1495.22	0
11	2014-08-10	26.81%	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	1510.92	3	Orlando City SC	1631.92	2
12	2014-07-13	27.03%	Arizona United SC	1424.84	2	@ Orange County Blues FC	1486.04	1
13	2014-08-03	27.37%	@ Pittsburgh Riverhounds	1420.98	3	Los Angeles Galaxy II	1536.80	1
14	2014-09-13 *	28.71%	Harrisburg City Islanders	1500.59	1	@ Orlando City SC	1629.71	0
15	2014-05-11	29.36%	Orange County Blues FC	1470.04	1	@ OKC Energy FC	1510.24	0
16	2014-05-11	29.46%	Arizona United SC	1441.57	1	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	1480.90	0
17	2014-06-08	29.75%	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	1431.04	3	@ Rochester Rhinos	1467.91	2
18	2014-09-07	30.47%	Los Angeles Galaxy II	1534.67	2	@ Sacramento Republic	1565.44	1
19	2014-04-20	30.51%	Dayton Dutch Lions	1480.74	1	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	1511.14	0
20	2014-09-20 *	31.01%	Harrisburg City Islanders	1507.74	3	@ Richmond Kickers	1617.79	2
21	2014-08-11	31.94%	Orange County Blues FC	1440.86	1	@ Rochester Rhinos	1459.59	0
22	2014-04-05	31.97%	Dayton Dutch Lions	1475.46	1	@ Charlotte Eagles	1493.91	0
23	2014-04-14	31.98%	Sacramento Republic	1495.80	3	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	1514.21	0
24	2014-07-03	32.55%	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	1418.59	2	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	1432.45	1
25	2014-04-27	32.67%	@ Rochester Rhinos	1453.63	1	Charleston Battery	1524.24	0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2014-05-26	18.68	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	5	1519.62	46.09%	OKC Energy FC	0	1494.03	31.09%	22.82%
2	2014-05-03	18.44	Charleston Battery	4	1518.62	36.98%	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	0	1499.34	39.72%	23.30%
3	2014-04-13	17.15	OKC Energy FC	4	1503.48	40.55%	@ Arizona United SC	0	1459.23	36.17%	23.28%
4	2014-07-27	16.15	Los Angeles Galaxy II	4	1529.27	43.32%	@ Orange County Blues FC	0	1465.59	33.57%	23.11%
5	2014-07-28	15.84	@ Sacramento Republic	5	1509.35	52.49%	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	0	1436.82	25.86%	21.65%
6	2014-04-14	15.59	Sacramento Republic	3	1495.80	31.98%	@ Los Angeles Galaxy II	0	1514.21	45.08%	22.94%
7	2014-08-18	15.12	Sacramento Republic	6	1533.26	47.01%	@ Orange County Blues FC	1	1443.30	30.29%	22.69%
8	2014-09-06	14.91	Wilmington Hammerheads	4	1492.76	46.77%	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	0	1404.57	30.50%	22.73%
9	2014-08-31	14.72	Rochester Rhinos	4	1443.70	26.37%	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	1	1511.26	51.83%	21.80%
10	2014-04-28	14.59	Los Angeles Galaxy II	3	1505.82	35.32%	@ Orange County Blues FC	0	1498.58	41.44%	23.24%
11	2014-07-20	14.52	@ Arizona United SC	3	1431.49	35.57%	Orange County Blues FC	0	1480.11	41.18%	23.25%
12	2014-04-27	13.44	Richmond Kickers	5	1550.76	43.39%	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	1	1486.60	33.50%	23.11%
13	2014-09-01	13.13	@ Orlando City SC	7	1612.92	67.51%	Dayton Dutch Lions	0	1417.70	16.00%	16.49%
14	2014-06-15	13.07	@ Charleston Battery	3	1529.96	40.76%	Los Angeles Galaxy II	0	1541.99	35.97%	23.27%
15	2014-08-21	12.60	@ Charlotte Eagles	2	1482.63	24.05%	Orlando City SC	0	1631.36	54.92%	21.03%
16	2014-07-20	12.38	@ Richmond Kickers	4	1603.77	53.83%	Charleston Battery	0	1521.16	24.85%	21.32%
17	2014-07-06	12.37	@ Harrisburg City Islanders	4	1481.58	35.05%	Charleston Battery	1	1534.07	41.73%	23.22%
18	2014-07-27	12.09	OKC Energy FC	3	1496.21	44.32%	@ Dayton Dutch Lions	0	1425.46	32.66%	23.02%
19	2014-08-31	12.05	@ Charleston Battery	4	1524.62	54.76%	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	0	1434.90	24.17%	21.08%
20	2014-05-24	11.95	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	5	1487.99	48.35%	Pittsburgh Riverhounds	1	1446.10	29.17%	22.48%
21	2014-04-25	11.22	@ Orange County Blues FC	4	1487.36	39.92%	Harrisburg City Islanders	1	1505.28	36.79%	23.30%
22	2014-05-10	11.11	@ Richmond Kickers	4	1563.24	57.43%	Arizona United SC	0	1452.67	22.27%	20.30%
23	2014-08-29	10.79	@ Wilmington Hammerheads	3	1480.78	24.60%	Orlando City SC	1	1623.71	54.17%	21.23%
24	2014-07-06	10.43	Dayton Dutch Lions	3	1427.14	26.26%	@ Charlotte Eagles	1	1495.73	51.97%	21.77%
25	2014-04-06	10.26	OKC Energy FC	2	1500.00	34.27%	@ Orange County Blues FC	0	1500.57	42.56%	23.17%