Home / Leagues / Norway / Tippeligaen / 2002
‹ ›

2002 Tippeligaen Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

56 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Lyn Oslo

10.75 points above expected

47 points · 36.25 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Start

11.92 points below expected

11 points · 22.92 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Rosenborg 26 17 5 4 56 57 30 +27 49.34 +6.66
2 Molde 26 15 5 6 50 48 26 +22 44.41 +5.59
3 Lyn Oslo 26 14 5 7 47 36 29 +7 36.25 +10.75
4 Viking 26 11 11 4 44 44 31 +13 42.94 +1.06
5 Stabaek 26 12 6 8 42 48 34 +14 39.86 +2.14
6 Odd Grenland 26 12 5 9 41 36 30 +6 38.00 +3.00
7 Lillestrom 26 10 6 10 36 37 30 +7 41.31 -5.31
8 Valerenga 26 7 12 7 33 38 31 +7 36.33 -3.33
9 Bryne 26 8 7 11 31 38 39 -1 27.11 +3.89
10 Bodo Glimt 26 9 4 13 31 38 41 -3 36.29 -5.29
11 Sogndal 26 8 6 12 30 37 51 -14 25.05 +4.95
12 Brann 26 8 3 15 27 35 52 -17 34.03 -7.03
13 Moss 26 6 6 14 24 32 49 -17 28.78 -4.78
14 Start 26 2 5 19 11 21 72 -51 22.92 -11.92

Form

Each team's 5-game rolling points-per-game across the season. Hot streaks push above the dashed 1.5 PPG reference line; cold spells drop below. Each team gets a distinct color; the legend below the plot lets you read off which line is which. (First 4 games of each team have no rolling window, so the lines start at game 5.)

League Race

Cumulative points across the season for each team. Highlighted teams are drawn in color (top finishers for the Title Race, bottom finishers for the Relegation Race); the rest of the league appears in light gray as context. Switch views with the buttons below.

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Rosenborg 1836 56 49.34 +6.66 87.3% 27 39 45 49 54 60 71
Molde 1772 50 44.41 +5.59 83.2% 15 34 40 44 49 55 68
Viking 1733 44 42.94 +1.06 59.5% 19 32 38 43 47 54 70
Lillestrom 1730 36 41.31 -5.31 23.0% 19 31 37 41 46 52 64
Stabaek 1719 42 39.86 +2.14 65.5% 16 29 35 40 44 51 64
Odd Grenland 1678 41 38.00 +3.00 71.0% 15 27 34 38 42 49 62
Lyn Oslo 1673 47 36.25 +10.75 95.6% 16 26 32 36 41 47 62
Valerenga 1642 33 36.33 -3.33 33.3% 13 26 32 36 41 47 63
Bodo Glimt 1615 31 36.29 -5.29 23.3% 12 26 32 36 41 47 61
Bryne 1605 31 27.11 +3.89 76.0% 8 17 23 27 31 38 50
Brann 1572 27 34.03 -7.03 15.1% 9 24 30 34 38 45 57
Sogndal 1566 30 25.05 +4.95 81.5% 7 15 21 25 29 35 48
Moss 1546 24 28.78 -4.78 25.2% 8 19 24 29 33 40 59
Start 1377 11 22.92 -11.92 2.1% 4 14 19 23 27 33 44

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team BG BRA BRY LIL LO MOL MOS OG ROS SOG STA STA VAL VIK
Bodo Glimt —
1-0-1
2.97
1-0-1
3.57
0-0-2
2.38
0-0-2
2.84
0-0-2
1.89
1-0-1
3.23
1-0-1
2.86
0-0-2
1.66
2-0-0
3.61
1-0-1
2.40
2-0-0
3.97
0-2-0
2.68
0-2-0
2.34
Brann
1-0-1
2.54
 —
0-0-2
3.44
1-0-1
2.02
1-1-0
2.27
1-0-1
2.24
1-0-1
3.29
0-0-2
2.49
0-0-2
1.63
1-0-1
3.54
1-0-1
2.32
1-1-0
3.55
0-1-1
2.90
0-0-2
1.77
Bryne
1-0-1
1.95
2-0-0
2.09
 —
0-1-1
1.63
0-0-2
2.19
0-0-2
1.66
0-1-1
2.82
0-1-1
1.98
1-0-1
1.23
1-0-1
2.71
1-0-1
1.56
2-0-0
3.36
0-2-0
2.22
0-2-0
1.66
Lillestrom
2-0-0
3.12
1-0-1
3.50
1-1-0
3.91
 —
0-0-2
3.31
0-1-1
2.44
1-1-0
3.45
1-0-1
2.81
0-0-2
2.23
1-0-1
3.94
0-1-1
2.87
2-0-0
3.89
0-2-0
3.07
1-0-1
2.76
Lyn Oslo
2-0-0
2.66
0-1-1
3.25
2-0-0
3.33
2-0-0
2.20
 —
1-0-1
2.12
1-0-1
3.22
1-1-0
2.42
0-0-2
2.00
1-1-0
3.65
1-0-1
2.67
1-1-0
3.69
2-0-0
2.61
0-1-1
2.33
Molde
2-0-0
3.64
1-0-1
3.26
2-0-0
3.88
1-1-0
3.06
1-0-1
3.39
 —
2-0-0
3.89
0-2-0
3.08
0-0-2
2.39
0-1-1
4.23
1-0-1
3.37
2-0-0
4.23
2-0-0
3.42
1-1-0
2.69
Moss
1-0-1
2.27
1-0-1
2.22
1-1-0
2.67
0-1-1
2.08
1-0-1
2.30
0-0-2
1.64
 —
0-0-2
2.21
0-1-1
1.37
1-1-0
2.93
0-0-2
1.71
1-0-1
3.38
0-1-1
2.19
0-1-1
1.81
Odd Grenland
1-0-1
2.64
2-0-0
3.02
1-1-0
3.55
1-0-1
2.69
0-1-1
3.08
0-2-0
2.43
2-0-0
3.31
 —
1-0-1
2.00
1-0-1
3.61
0-1-1
2.57
1-0-1
3.87
0-0-2
2.88
2-0-0
2.23
Rosenborg
2-0-0
3.87
2-0-0
3.93
1-0-1
4.35
2-0-0
3.30
2-0-0
3.52
2-0-0
3.11
1-1-0
4.20
1-0-1
3.52
 —
1-1-0
4.41
1-1-0
3.46
2-0-0
4.56
0-2-0
3.71
0-0-2
3.32
Sogndal
0-0-2
1.91
1-0-1
1.97
1-0-1
2.79
1-0-1
1.59
0-1-1
1.87
1-1-0
1.34
0-1-1
2.57
1-0-1
1.92
0-1-1
1.18
 —
1-0-1
1.61
1-1-0
2.93
1-0-1
1.91
0-1-1
1.50
Stabaek
1-0-1
3.12
1-0-1
3.19
1-0-1
3.98
1-1-0
2.63
1-0-1
2.83
1-0-1
2.14
2-0-0
3.83
1-1-0
2.93
0-1-1
2.07
1-0-1
3.92
 —
1-1-0
3.78
1-1-0
3.06
0-1-1
2.44
Start
0-0-2
1.57
0-1-1
1.98
0-0-2
2.16
0-0-2
1.65
0-1-1
1.83
0-0-2
1.35
1-0-1
2.12
1-0-1
1.67
0-0-2
1.05
0-1-1
2.57
0-1-1
1.77
 —
0-0-2
1.58
0-1-1
1.61
Valerenga
0-2-0
2.82
1-1-0
2.61
0-2-0
3.30
0-2-0
2.44
0-0-2
2.89
0-0-2
2.09
1-1-0
3.33
2-0-0
2.63
0-2-0
1.82
1-0-1
3.61
0-1-1
2.45
2-0-0
3.97
 —
0-1-1
2.38
Viking
0-2-0
3.19
2-0-0
3.75
0-2-0
3.88
1-0-1
2.75
1-1-0
3.18
0-1-1
2.82
1-1-0
3.72
0-0-2
3.28
2-0-0
2.19
1-1-0
4.05
1-1-0
3.07
1-1-0
3.94
1-1-0
3.13
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.77 +12.1
Allowed 0.77 -8.0
Differential 0.89 +5.6

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
06.59%6.04%9.62%3.30%2.20%0.55%28.30%
16.04%9.89%4.40%3.85%1.92%0.82%26.92%
29.62%4.40%4.95%3.02%0.82%1.10%23.90%
33.30%3.85%3.02%2.20%0.55%—12.91%
42.20%1.92%0.82%0.55%——5.49%
5+0.55%0.82%1.10%———2.47%
Total28.30%26.92%23.90%12.91%5.49%2.47%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 1.50 +0.00
SD 1.37 1.37 2.04
CV 0.91 0.91 —
Max 7 7 +7
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%11.54%11.54%3.85%——30.77%
1—3.85%3.85%7.69%3.85%—19.23%
215.38%3.85%7.69%———26.92%
33.85%3.85%3.85%—7.69%—19.23%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+———————
Total26.92%23.08%26.92%11.54%11.54%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.46 1.58 -0.12
SD 1.24 1.33 1.90
CV 0.85 0.84 —
Max 4 4 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.69%7.69%—11.54%—26.92%
111.54%7.69%7.69%7.69%3.85%—38.46%
2——3.85%11.54%——15.38%
3—3.85%7.69%———11.54%
4—7.69%————7.69%
5+———————
Total11.54%26.92%26.92%19.23%15.38%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.35 2.00 -0.65
SD 1.23 1.26 1.96
CV 0.91 0.63 —
Max 4 4 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%11.54%3.85%—3.85%—26.92%
1—11.54%11.54%3.85%——26.92%
23.85%11.54%3.85%7.69%——26.92%
33.85%3.85%—3.85%——11.54%
43.85%——3.85%——7.69%
5+———————
Total19.23%38.46%19.23%19.23%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.46 1.50 -0.04
SD 1.24 1.14 1.66
CV 0.85 0.76 —
Max 4 4 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%11.54%7.69%———23.08%
13.85%19.23%3.85%11.54%——38.46%
215.38%7.69%———3.85%26.92%
37.69%—————7.69%
4———————
5+3.85%—————3.85%
Total34.62%38.46%11.54%11.54%—3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.42 1.15 +0.27
SD 1.45 1.26 2.16
CV 1.02 1.09 —
Max 7 5 +7
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%3.85%——3.85%19.23%
123.08%7.69%———3.85%34.62%
215.38%3.85%7.69%7.69%——34.62%
33.85%7.69%————11.54%
4———————
5+———————
Total46.15%26.92%11.54%7.69%—7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.38 1.12 +0.27
SD 0.94 1.48 1.87
CV 0.68 1.33 —
Max 3 5 +3
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.54%——3.85%——15.38%
13.85%3.85%7.69%3.85%3.85%—23.08%
226.92%3.85%——3.85%—34.62%
311.54%—3.85%3.85%——19.23%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total57.69%11.54%11.54%11.54%7.69%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.85 1.00 +0.85
SD 1.26 1.39 1.99
CV 0.68 1.39 —
Max 5 4 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%23.08%———34.62%
115.38%7.69%—3.85%3.85%3.85%34.62%
2——7.69%7.69%—3.85%19.23%
3———3.85%——3.85%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total23.08%19.23%30.77%15.38%3.85%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.23 1.88 -0.65
SD 1.42 1.68 2.15
CV 1.16 0.89 —
Max 6 7 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%7.69%7.69%7.69%——30.77%
17.69%11.54%—7.69%——26.92%
215.38%——3.85%——19.23%
33.85%15.38%————19.23%
4——3.85%———3.85%
5+———————
Total34.62%34.62%11.54%19.23%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.38 1.15 +0.23
SD 1.24 1.12 1.82
CV 0.89 0.97 —
Max 4 3 +3
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%3.85%7.69%———19.23%
13.85%3.85%3.85%———11.54%
23.85%11.54%7.69%———23.08%
37.69%7.69%11.54%———26.92%
43.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%——15.38%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total26.92%34.62%34.62%3.85%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.19 1.15 +1.04
SD 1.47 0.88 1.61
CV 0.67 0.76 —
Max 5 3 +4
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%11.54%11.54%7.69%—38.46%
13.85%3.85%3.85%———11.54%
27.69%3.85%7.69%3.85%3.85%—26.92%
33.85%—7.69%7.69%——19.23%
4———————
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total19.23%11.54%34.62%23.08%11.54%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.42 1.96 -0.54
SD 1.39 1.28 2.00
CV 0.98 0.65 —
Max 5 4 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%3.85%11.54%———23.08%
17.69%11.54%11.54%—3.85%—34.62%
23.85%11.54%————15.38%
3——3.85%3.85%——7.69%
43.85%—3.85%———7.69%
5+3.85%—7.69%———11.54%
Total26.92%26.92%38.46%3.85%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.85 1.31 +0.54
SD 1.85 1.05 2.06
CV 1.00 0.80 —
Max 7 4 +5
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%19.23%7.69%7.69%3.85%46.15%
1—7.69%3.85%7.69%3.85%3.85%26.92%
27.69%—7.69%—3.85%7.69%26.92%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total11.54%11.54%30.77%15.38%15.38%15.38%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.81 2.77 -1.96
SD 0.85 1.95 2.09
CV 1.05 0.70 —
Max 2 7 +2
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.54%3.85%11.54%3.85%——30.77%
1—26.92%3.85%—3.85%—34.62%
27.69%—7.69%———15.38%
3—7.69%————7.69%
47.69%—————7.69%
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total26.92%38.46%26.92%3.85%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.46 1.19 +0.27
SD 1.65 1.02 2.03
CV 1.13 0.86 —
Max 7 4 +5
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
015.38%—7.69%7.69%——30.77%
13.85%11.54%————15.38%
211.54%3.85%7.69%———23.08%
3—3.85%3.85%7.69%——15.38%
4—15.38%————15.38%
5+———————
Total30.77%34.62%19.23%15.38%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.69 1.19 +0.50
SD 1.46 1.06 1.73
CV 0.86 0.89 —
Max 4 3 +3
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Lyn Oslo 47 36.25 +10.75
2 Rosenborg 56 49.34 +6.66
3 Molde 50 44.41 +5.59
4 Sogndal 30 25.05 +4.95
5 Bryne 31 27.11 +3.89

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Start 11 22.92 -11.92
2 Brann 27 34.03 -7.03
3 Lillestrom 36 41.31 -5.31
4 Bodo Glimt 31 36.29 -5.29
5 Moss 24 28.78 -4.78

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts W or D consecutively; Winless counts L or D consecutively.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Lyn Oslo 5 May 1 – May 16 1 in 175
2 Rosenborg 7 Jul 29 – Sep 1 1 in 66
3 Molde 6 May 12 – Jun 16 1 in 60
4 Brann 3 May 5 – May 12 1 in 26
5 Sogndal 2 Jul 28 – Jul 31 1 in 25

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Lillestrom 6 Jun 2 – Jul 21 1 in 1,293
2 Bodo Glimt 5 May 16 – Jun 16 1 in 105
3 Brann 4 Aug 12 – Sep 1 1 in 85
4 Start 8 Aug 25 – Oct 27 1 in 50
5 Stabaek 2 Aug 4 – Aug 11 1 in 26

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Viking 12 Jun 15 – Sep 30 1 in 42
2 Sogndal 4 Aug 25 – Sep 29 1 in 22
3 Lillestrom 8 Aug 18 – Oct 27 1 in 19
4 Stabaek 5 May 12 – Jun 9 1 in 13
5 Rosenborg 12 Jul 29 – Oct 27 1 in 13

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Bodo Glimt 9 May 11 – Jul 28 1 in 58
2 Lillestrom 6 Jun 2 – Jul 21 1 in 35
3 Moss 9 Apr 28 – Jun 10 1 in 26
4 Valerenga 7 Aug 14 – Oct 6 1 in 24
5 Brann 6 Aug 1 – Sep 1 1 in 18

Finish Position Heatmap

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team1234567891011121314
Rosenborg48.35%21.55%11.93%7.09%4.57%2.83%1.62%0.92%0.76%0.22%0.10%0.06%——
Molde17.61%20.62%16.44%12.69%10.44%7.36%5.57%3.83%2.56%1.68%0.69%0.32%0.17%0.02%
Lyn Oslo1.87%4.03%5.97%8.33%9.20%10.81%10.66%11.82%11.35%9.72%7.71%4.94%2.45%1.14%
Viking11.64%16.80%15.66%13.60%11.37%9.20%7.39%5.28%4.04%2.32%1.67%0.74%0.21%0.08%
Stabaek5.63%9.47%11.26%12.54%12.55%11.28%10.16%8.57%7.21%5.16%3.19%2.03%0.68%0.27%
Odd Grenland3.13%5.93%8.26%9.59%11.09%12.02%12.00%10.38%9.00%8.13%5.31%3.16%1.35%0.65%
Lillestrom7.58%11.76%13.56%13.94%11.85%11.01%9.43%7.42%5.54%3.62%2.36%1.35%0.49%0.09%
Valerenga1.68%3.68%6.63%8.11%9.02%11.10%11.54%11.48%10.76%10.32%7.46%4.64%2.62%0.96%
Bryne0.03%0.18%0.37%0.64%1.28%2.13%3.24%5.08%7.96%11.12%15.12%18.88%19.11%14.86%
Bodo Glimt1.63%3.52%5.86%7.22%9.51%10.00%11.67%12.36%11.57%10.04%7.89%4.81%2.87%1.05%
Sogndal0.02%0.06%0.13%0.30%0.58%1.09%1.61%3.14%4.77%7.70%13.01%17.82%24.78%24.99%
Brann0.76%2.12%3.24%4.50%6.29%7.66%9.89%11.61%12.80%13.42%11.12%8.70%5.53%2.36%
Moss0.07%0.28%0.67%1.36%2.05%3.06%4.34%6.47%9.04%12.13%15.97%17.66%16.23%10.67%
Start——0.02%0.09%0.20%0.45%0.88%1.64%2.64%4.42%8.40%14.89%23.51%42.86%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Points Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 5% * Slight Edge: 5% to 15% * Clear Edge: 15% to 25% * Strong Edge: 25% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+14.84%
Slight Edge
45.60%23.63%30.77%
Elo Value
Home Edge
157 Elo
0.006 goals per Elo point
051.93400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.41 goals
Neutral
-2+0.33+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.15 * Tight Race: 0.15 to 0.4 * Comfortable: 0.4 to 0.75 * Runaway: 0.75 and up.
Title-Race Openness
3.5
Top-Heavy
124610
Champion Preseason Odds
48%
Rosenborg, 1st of 14
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.23/gm
Tight Race
00.180.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 5.09 * Some Luck: 5.09 to 7.63 * Lucky: 7.63 to 10.17 * Wild Swing: 10.17 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.71 * Close: 1.71 to 2.57 * Off: 2.57 to 3.42 * Way Off: 3.42 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
6.14 points
Some Luck
06.3616
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.57
Pinpoint
02.145
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 96.43%
95.57%
Lyn Oslo
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 3.57%
2.05%
Start
050
Season Outliers
Expected
2 of 14
Minimal Outliers
01.47

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.12 * Even: 0.12 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.26 * Lopsided: 0.26 and up.
Noll-Scully
How much more spread out the table was than a league where every match is a coin flip. The gold line at 1 is that coin-flip baseline. Above it, real talent gaps stretched the table; below it, the league was tighter than luck alone would produce.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1 * Moderate Separation: 1 to 1.6 * Strong Separation: 1.6 to 2.2 * Wide Separation: 2.2 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 60% * Slight Edge: 60% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 80% * Wide Edge: 80% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 82% * Strong Edge: 82% to 92% * Dominant: 92% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 30% * Some Drama: 30% to 40% * Frequent: 40% to 50% * Very Frequent: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 8% * Occasional: 8% to 14% * Frequent: 14% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.18
Even
00.120.180.260.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.53
Moderate Separation
01.003
Interquartile Edge
70%
Slight Edge
50%60%70%80%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
93%
Dominant
50%92%100%
Close Games
Expected
52%
Very Frequent
0%54%100%
Blowouts
Expected
20%
Frequent
0%22%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.1 * Slight Separation: 0.1 to 0.18 * Notable Separation: 0.18 to 0.28 * Lopsided: 0.28 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.3 * Some Carryover: 0.3 to 0.6 * Strong Carryover: 0.6 to 0.85 * Near-Lock: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 25% * As Expected: 25% to 33% * Upset-Prone: 33% to 42% * Very Upset-Prone: 42% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 15% * As Expected: 15% to 25% * Shaky Favorites: 25% to 35% * Very Shaky: 35% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.60
Predictable
00.612
Matchup Imbalance
0.33
Lopsided
00.10.180.280.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.97
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.56
Some Carryover
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
27%
As Expected
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
25%
Shaky Favorites
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.18 * Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.25 * Well Above Noise: 0.25 and up.
Probability calibration
0.68
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.93
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.067
Well Within Noise
00.1230.3

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Qualified for relegation playoff Direct relegation
Rosenborg 99.94% 0.06% —
Molde 99.49% 0.32% 0.19%
Viking 98.97% 0.74% 0.29%
Lillestrom 98.07% 1.35% 0.58%
Stabaek 97.02% 2.03% 0.95%
Odd Grenland 94.84% 3.16% 2.00%
Valerenga 91.78% 4.64% 3.58%
Lyn Oslo 91.47% 4.94% 3.59%
Bodo Glimt 91.27% 4.81% 3.92%
Brann 83.41% 8.70% 7.89%
Moss 55.44% 17.66% 26.90%
Bryne 47.15% 18.88% 33.97%
Sogndal 32.41% 17.82% 49.77%
Start 18.74% 14.89% 66.37%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss % Elo Δ Points
2002-04-13 Brann W 2-0 1677 1688 43.2% 24.9% 31.8% +15.6 3
2002-04-13 @ Molde L 0-2 1688 1677 31.8% 24.9% 43.2% -15.6 0
2002-04-14 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1623 1651 40.8% 25.0% 34.2% -0.3 1
2002-04-14 @ Valerenga D 1-1 1651 1623 34.2% 25.0% 40.8% +0.3 1
2002-04-14 Lyn Oslo L 0-1 1553 1586 40.2% 25.0% 34.7% -9.9 0
2002-04-14 @ Bryne W 1-0 1586 1553 34.7% 25.0% 40.2% +9.9 3
2002-04-14 Odd Grenland L 0-1 1768 1654 58.4% 23.0% 18.6% -13.5 0
2002-04-14 @ Rosenborg W 1-0 1654 1768 18.6% 23.0% 58.4% +13.5 3
2002-04-14 Sogndal D 3-3 1608 1578 48.6% 24.5% 26.8% -0.7 1
2002-04-14 @ Moss D 3-3 1578 1608 26.8% 24.5% 48.6% +0.7 1
2002-04-14 Stabaek D 1-1 1575 1674 31.1% 24.9% 44.0% +0.7 1
2002-04-14 @ Start D 1-1 1674 1575 44.0% 24.9% 31.1% -0.7 1
2002-04-14 Viking W 2-0 1737 1692 50.6% 24.3% 25.1% +12.9 3
2002-04-14 @ Lillestrom L 0-2 1692 1737 25.1% 24.3% 50.6% -12.9 0
2002-04-20 Valerenga D 0-0 1673 1622 51.2% 24.2% 24.5% -1.6 2
2002-04-20 @ Stabaek D 0-0 1622 1673 24.5% 24.2% 51.2% +1.5 2
2002-04-21 Bryne W 4-0 1651 1544 57.8% 23.1% 19.1% +19.1 4
2002-04-21 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-4 1544 1651 19.1% 23.1% 57.8% -19.1 0
2002-04-21 Lillestrom W 2-0 1596 1750 24.6% 24.2% 51.2% +22.8 6
2002-04-21 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-2 1750 1596 51.2% 24.2% 24.6% -22.8 3
2002-04-21 Molde D 1-1 1668 1692 41.3% 25.0% 33.7% -0.4 4
2002-04-21 @ Odd Grenland D 1-1 1692 1668 33.7% 25.0% 41.3% +0.4 4
2002-04-21 Moss L 0-1 1672 1608 52.9% 24.0% 23.1% -12.4 0
2002-04-21 @ Brann W 1-0 1608 1672 23.1% 24.0% 52.9% +12.4 4
2002-04-21 Rosenborg W 2-0 1679 1754 34.2% 25.0% 40.7% +18.9 3
2002-04-21 @ Viking L 0-2 1754 1679 40.7% 25.0% 34.2% -18.9 0
2002-04-21 Start D 0-0 1579 1575 45.2% 24.8% 30.0% -0.9 2
2002-04-21 @ Sogndal D 0-0 1575 1579 30.0% 24.8% 45.2% +0.9 2
2002-04-27 Lyn Oslo W 5-1 1735 1619 58.7% 22.9% 18.4% +15.4 3
2002-04-27 @ Rosenborg L 1-5 1619 1735 18.4% 22.9% 58.7% -15.4 6
2002-04-28 Brann D 2-2 1576 1660 33.1% 25.0% 41.9% +0.3 3
2002-04-28 @ Start D 2-2 1660 1576 41.9% 25.0% 33.1% -0.3 1
2002-04-28 Lillestrom D 1-1 1524 1727 19.8% 23.3% 56.8% +2.0 1
2002-04-28 @ Bryne D 1-1 1727 1524 56.8% 23.3% 19.8% -2.0 4
2002-04-28 Odd Grenland L 0-1 1620 1667 38.1% 25.1% 36.8% -9.5 4
2002-04-28 @ Moss W 1-0 1667 1620 36.8% 25.1% 38.1% +9.5 7
2002-04-28 Sogndal W 2-0 1624 1578 50.6% 24.3% 25.1% +12.8 5
2002-04-28 @ Valerenga L 0-2 1578 1624 25.1% 24.3% 50.6% -12.8 2
2002-04-28 Stabaek W 2-0 1671 1672 44.6% 24.9% 30.6% +15.1 7
2002-04-28 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-2 1672 1671 30.6% 24.9% 44.6% -15.1 2
2002-04-28 Viking W 3-0 1693 1698 44.0% 24.9% 31.1% +22.3 7
2002-04-28 @ Molde L 0-3 1698 1693 31.1% 24.9% 44.0% -22.3 3
2002-05-01 Bodo Glimt L 0-2 1565 1686 28.4% 24.7% 46.9% -14.3 2
2002-05-01 @ Sogndal W 2-0 1686 1565 46.9% 24.7% 28.4% +14.3 10
2002-05-01 Bryne W 2-1 1656 1526 60.1% 22.6% 17.3% +4.6 5
2002-05-01 @ Stabaek L 1-2 1526 1656 17.3% 22.6% 60.1% -4.6 1
2002-05-01 Molde W 3-1 1603 1715 29.4% 24.8% 45.8% +17.9 9
2002-05-01 @ Lyn Oslo L 1-3 1715 1603 45.8% 24.8% 29.4% -18.0 7
2002-05-01 Moss W 4-1 1676 1610 53.0% 24.0% 23.0% +14.6 6
2002-05-01 @ Viking L 1-4 1610 1676 23.0% 24.0% 53.0% -14.6 4
2002-05-01 Rosenborg L 0-1 1725 1751 41.3% 25.0% 33.7% -10.1 4
2002-05-01 @ Lillestrom W 1-0 1751 1725 33.7% 25.0% 41.3% +10.1 6
2002-05-01 Start W 2-0 1677 1577 57.0% 23.3% 19.7% +10.4 10
2002-05-01 @ Odd Grenland L 0-2 1577 1677 19.7% 23.3% 57.0% -10.4 3
2002-05-01 Valerenga L 0-4 1659 1637 47.7% 24.6% 27.7% -40.7 1
2002-05-01 @ Brann W 4-0 1637 1659 27.7% 24.6% 47.7% +40.7 8
2002-05-04 Lillestrom D 0-0 1697 1715 42.2% 25.0% 32.8% -0.5 8
2002-05-04 @ Molde D 0-0 1715 1697 32.8% 25.0% 42.2% +0.5 5
2002-05-05 Brann L 0-1 1700 1619 54.9% 23.7% 21.4% -12.8 10
2002-05-05 @ Bodo Glimt W 1-0 1619 1700 21.4% 23.7% 54.9% +12.8 4
2002-05-05 Lyn Oslo L 0-2 1596 1621 41.2% 25.0% 33.8% -19.0 4
2002-05-05 @ Moss W 2-0 1621 1596 33.8% 25.0% 41.2% +19.0 12
2002-05-05 Odd Grenland W 2-0 1677 1687 43.4% 24.9% 31.7% +15.6 11
2002-05-05 @ Valerenga L 0-2 1687 1677 31.7% 24.9% 43.4% -15.6 10
2002-05-05 Rosenborg W 2-1 1522 1761 16.9% 22.5% 60.6% +13.2 4
2002-05-05 @ Bryne L 1-2 1761 1522 60.6% 22.5% 16.9% -13.2 6
2002-05-05 Sogndal W 4-0 1661 1551 58.0% 23.1% 18.9% +19.0 8
2002-05-05 @ Stabaek L 0-4 1551 1661 18.9% 23.1% 58.0% -19.0 2
2002-05-05 Viking D 1-1 1566 1690 28.0% 24.6% 47.4% +1.0 4
2002-05-05 @ Start D 1-1 1690 1566 47.4% 24.6% 28.0% -1.0 7
2002-05-08 Bodo Glimt L 2-3 1672 1687 42.6% 24.9% 32.4% -9.3 10
2002-05-08 @ Odd Grenland W 3-2 1687 1672 32.4% 24.9% 42.6% +9.3 13
2002-05-08 Start W 1-0 1640 1567 53.9% 23.9% 22.2% +6.2 15
2002-05-08 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-1 1567 1640 22.2% 23.9% 53.9% -6.2 4
2002-05-08 Valerenga W 4-1 1689 1693 44.2% 24.9% 30.9% +18.7 10
2002-05-08 @ Viking L 1-4 1693 1689 30.9% 24.9% 44.2% -18.7 11
2002-05-09 Molde W 3-0 1747 1697 51.2% 24.2% 24.5% +18.3 9
2002-05-09 @ Rosenborg L 0-3 1697 1747 24.5% 24.2% 51.2% -18.3 8
2002-05-09 Moss D 1-1 1716 1577 61.0% 22.4% 16.6% -2.4 6
2002-05-09 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1577 1716 16.6% 22.4% 61.0% +2.4 5
2002-05-09 Stabaek W 4-1 1631 1680 38.0% 25.1% 37.0% +21.5 7
2002-05-09 @ Brann L 1-4 1680 1631 37.0% 25.1% 38.0% -21.5 8
2002-05-11 Lyn Oslo L 1-2 1674 1646 48.4% 24.6% 27.1% -10.8 11
2002-05-11 @ Valerenga W 2-1 1646 1674 27.1% 24.6% 48.4% +10.8 18
2002-05-11 Viking D 0-0 1696 1708 43.1% 24.9% 31.9% -0.6 14
2002-05-11 @ Bodo Glimt D 0-0 1708 1696 31.9% 24.9% 43.1% +0.6 11
2002-05-12 Brann L 2-3 1532 1653 28.3% 24.7% 47.0% -6.8 2
2002-05-12 @ Sogndal W 3-2 1653 1532 47.0% 24.7% 28.3% +6.8 10
2002-05-12 Lillestrom L 0-2 1561 1713 24.8% 24.3% 50.9% -12.7 4
2002-05-12 @ Start W 2-0 1713 1561 50.9% 24.3% 24.8% +12.7 9
2002-05-12 Molde L 0-2 1535 1678 25.8% 24.4% 49.8% -13.2 4
2002-05-12 @ Bryne W 2-0 1678 1535 49.8% 24.4% 25.8% +13.2 11
2002-05-12 Odd Grenland W 1-0 1658 1663 44.2% 24.9% 30.9% +8.1 11
2002-05-12 @ Stabaek L 0-1 1663 1658 30.9% 24.9% 44.2% -8.1 10
2002-05-12 Rosenborg D 2-2 1579 1766 21.3% 23.7% 55.0% +1.3 6
2002-05-12 @ Moss D 2-2 1766 1579 55.0% 23.7% 21.3% -1.3 10
2002-05-16 Bodo Glimt W 3-1 1657 1696 39.4% 25.0% 35.6% +14.7 21
2002-05-16 @ Lyn Oslo L 1-3 1696 1657 35.6% 25.0% 39.4% -14.7 14
2002-05-16 Bryne L 1-2 1660 1522 60.9% 22.4% 16.7% -13.2 10
2002-05-16 @ Brann W 2-1 1522 1660 16.7% 22.4% 60.9% +13.3 7
2002-05-16 Moss W 5-1 1691 1581 58.1% 23.1% 18.8% +15.8 14
2002-05-16 @ Molde L 1-5 1581 1691 18.8% 23.1% 58.1% -15.8 6
2002-05-16 Sogndal W 4-2 1654 1525 60.0% 22.6% 17.4% +7.1 13
2002-05-16 @ Odd Grenland L 2-4 1525 1654 17.4% 22.6% 60.0% -7.1 2
2002-05-16 Stabaek D 3-3 1709 1667 50.2% 24.4% 25.5% -0.8 12
2002-05-16 @ Viking D 3-3 1667 1709 25.5% 24.4% 50.2% +0.8 12
2002-05-16 Start W 4-2 1764 1548 68.1% 20.1% 11.8% +4.8 13
2002-05-16 @ Rosenborg L 2-4 1548 1764 11.8% 20.1% 68.1% -4.8 4
2002-05-16 Valerenga D 1-1 1726 1664 52.7% 24.0% 23.3% -1.5 10
2002-05-16 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1664 1726 23.3% 24.0% 52.7% +1.5 12
2002-05-20 Bryne W 3-2 1518 1535 42.4% 25.0% 32.6% +7.5 5
2002-05-20 @ Sogndal L 2-3 1535 1518 32.6% 25.0% 42.4% -7.6 7
2002-05-25 Rosenborg D 0-0 1665 1769 30.4% 24.8% 44.8% +0.8 13
2002-05-25 @ Valerenga D 0-0 1769 1665 44.8% 24.8% 30.4% -0.8 14
2002-05-26 Lillestrom L 0-1 1681 1725 38.7% 25.1% 36.3% -9.6 14
2002-05-26 @ Bodo Glimt W 1-0 1725 1681 36.3% 25.1% 38.7% +9.6 13
2002-05-26 Molde L 0-4 1544 1707 23.6% 24.1% 52.3% -23.1 4
2002-05-26 @ Start W 4-0 1707 1544 52.3% 24.1% 23.6% +23.1 17
2002-05-26 Moss D 0-0 1528 1565 39.6% 25.0% 35.4% -0.2 8
2002-05-26 @ Bryne D 0-0 1565 1528 35.4% 25.0% 39.6% +0.2 7
2002-05-26 Odd Grenland L 1-3 1646 1662 42.6% 24.9% 32.4% -17.0 10
2002-05-26 @ Brann W 3-1 1662 1646 32.4% 24.9% 42.6% +16.9 16
2002-05-26 Viking L 0-2 1526 1708 21.8% 23.8% 54.5% -11.4 5
2002-05-26 @ Sogndal W 2-0 1708 1526 54.5% 23.8% 21.8% +11.4 15
2002-05-27 Lyn Oslo W 5-0 1667 1672 44.1% 24.9% 31.0% +35.8 15
2002-05-27 @ Stabaek L 0-5 1672 1667 31.0% 24.9% 44.1% -35.8 21
2002-06-02 Bodo Glimt W 4-3 1768 1671 56.6% 23.4% 20.0% +4.9 17
2002-06-02 @ Rosenborg L 3-4 1671 1768 20.0% 23.4% 56.6% -4.9 14
2002-06-02 Brann W 4-1 1719 1629 55.8% 23.5% 20.7% +13.3 18
2002-06-02 @ Viking L 1-4 1629 1719 20.7% 23.5% 55.8% -13.3 10
2002-06-02 Bryne W 3-1 1679 1527 62.2% 22.0% 15.7% +7.3 19
2002-06-02 @ Odd Grenland L 1-3 1527 1679 15.7% 22.0% 62.2% -7.3 8
2002-06-02 Sogndal W 1-0 1636 1514 59.3% 22.8% 17.9% +5.0 24
2002-06-02 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-1 1514 1636 17.9% 22.8% 59.3% -5.1 5
2002-06-02 Stabaek L 1-2 1734 1703 48.8% 24.5% 26.7% -10.9 13
2002-06-02 @ Lillestrom W 2-1 1703 1734 26.7% 24.5% 48.8% +10.9 18
2002-06-02 Start L 0-2 1565 1520 50.5% 24.3% 25.2% -22.5 7
2002-06-02 @ Moss W 2-0 1520 1565 25.2% 24.3% 50.5% +22.5 7
2002-06-02 Valerenga W 2-0 1730 1666 52.9% 24.0% 23.1% +12.0 20
2002-06-02 @ Molde L 0-2 1666 1730 23.1% 24.0% 52.9% -12.0 13
2002-06-08 Lillestrom W 5-2 1509 1723 18.9% 23.1% 58.0% +26.9 8
2002-06-08 @ Sogndal L 2-5 1723 1509 58.0% 23.1% 18.9% -27.0 13
2002-06-09 Lyn Oslo D 1-1 1616 1641 41.3% 25.0% 33.7% -0.4 11
2002-06-09 @ Brann D 1-1 1641 1616 33.7% 25.0% 41.3% +0.4 25
2002-06-09 Molde L 0-2 1667 1742 34.1% 25.0% 40.9% -16.5 14
2002-06-09 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-0 1742 1667 40.9% 25.0% 34.1% +16.5 23
2002-06-09 Rosenborg D 0-0 1714 1773 36.4% 25.1% 38.5% +0.1 19
2002-06-09 @ Stabaek D 0-0 1773 1714 38.5% 25.1% 36.4% -0.1 18
2002-06-09 Start W 3-1 1520 1543 41.6% 25.0% 33.4% +14.0 11
2002-06-09 @ Bryne L 1-3 1543 1520 33.4% 25.0% 41.6% -14.1 7
2002-06-09 Viking W 2-0 1686 1732 38.2% 25.1% 36.7% +17.4 22
2002-06-09 @ Odd Grenland L 0-2 1732 1686 36.7% 25.1% 38.2% -17.4 18
2002-06-10 Moss W 3-1 1654 1543 58.2% 23.1% 18.8% +8.6 16
2002-06-10 @ Valerenga L 1-3 1543 1654 18.8% 23.1% 58.2% -8.6 7
2002-06-15 Viking D 3-3 1534 1715 21.9% 23.8% 54.4% +1.1 12
2002-06-15 @ Bryne D 3-3 1715 1534 54.4% 23.8% 21.9% -1.1 19
2002-06-16 Bodo Glimt W 1-0 1534 1650 28.9% 24.7% 46.4% +11.1 10
2002-06-16 @ Moss L 0-1 1650 1534 46.4% 24.7% 28.9% -11.1 14
2002-06-16 Brann L 0-1 1696 1616 54.8% 23.7% 21.5% -12.8 13
2002-06-16 @ Lillestrom W 1-0 1616 1696 21.5% 23.7% 54.8% +12.8 14
2002-06-16 Odd Grenland W 3-0 1642 1703 36.1% 25.1% 38.9% +26.4 28
2002-06-16 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-3 1703 1642 38.9% 25.1% 36.1% -26.4 22
2002-06-16 Sogndal W 3-0 1773 1536 69.8% 19.4% 10.7% +8.2 21
2002-06-16 @ Rosenborg L 0-3 1536 1773 10.7% 19.4% 69.8% -8.2 8
2002-06-16 Stabaek W 1-0 1759 1714 50.5% 24.3% 25.2% +6.8 26
2002-06-16 @ Molde L 0-1 1714 1759 25.2% 24.3% 50.5% -6.8 19
2002-06-16 Valerenga L 2-7 1529 1662 26.8% 24.5% 48.6% -22.1 7
2002-06-16 @ Start W 7-2 1662 1529 48.6% 24.5% 26.8% +22.1 19
2002-06-22 Lillestrom W 3-1 1677 1683 43.8% 24.9% 31.3% +13.4 25
2002-06-22 @ Odd Grenland L 1-3 1683 1677 31.3% 24.9% 43.8% -13.3 13
2002-06-30 Bryne W 1-0 1668 1535 60.4% 22.5% 17.1% +4.8 31
2002-06-30 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-1 1535 1668 17.1% 22.5% 60.4% -4.8 12
2002-06-30 Lillestrom W 3-1 1714 1670 50.4% 24.3% 25.3% +11.2 22
2002-06-30 @ Viking L 1-3 1670 1714 25.3% 24.3% 50.4% -11.2 13
2002-06-30 Molde W 4-1 1629 1766 26.5% 24.5% 49.1% +26.9 17
2002-06-30 @ Brann L 1-4 1766 1629 49.1% 24.5% 26.5% -26.9 26
2002-06-30 Moss L 0-4 1528 1545 42.4% 25.0% 32.6% -37.0 8
2002-06-30 @ Sogndal W 4-0 1545 1528 32.6% 25.0% 42.4% +37.0 13
2002-06-30 Rosenborg L 1-3 1690 1781 32.1% 24.9% 43.0% -13.6 25
2002-06-30 @ Odd Grenland W 3-1 1781 1690 43.0% 24.9% 32.1% +13.6 24
2002-06-30 Start W 5-2 1707 1507 66.8% 20.6% 12.6% +7.1 22
2002-06-30 @ Stabaek L 2-5 1507 1707 12.6% 20.6% 66.8% -7.1 7
2002-06-30 Valerenga D 2-2 1639 1685 38.4% 25.1% 36.6% -0.1 15
2002-06-30 @ Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1685 1639 36.6% 25.1% 38.4% +0.1 20
2002-07-20 Brann L 0-1 1582 1655 34.4% 25.0% 40.5% -8.8 13
2002-07-20 @ Moss W 1-0 1655 1582 40.5% 25.0% 34.4% +8.8 20
2002-07-20 Odd Grenland D 0-0 1739 1677 52.6% 24.1% 23.3% -1.7 27
2002-07-20 @ Molde D 0-0 1677 1739 23.3% 24.1% 52.6% +1.7 26
2002-07-21 Bodo Glimt W 4-3 1530 1639 29.8% 24.8% 45.3% +9.5 15
2002-07-21 @ Bryne L 3-4 1639 1530 45.3% 24.8% 29.8% -9.5 15
2002-07-21 Lyn Oslo L 0-1 1659 1673 42.8% 24.9% 32.2% -10.4 13
2002-07-21 @ Lillestrom W 1-0 1673 1659 32.2% 24.9% 42.8% +10.4 34
2002-07-21 Stabaek L 0-2 1685 1714 40.6% 25.0% 34.4% -18.8 20
2002-07-21 @ Valerenga W 2-0 1714 1685 34.4% 25.0% 40.6% +18.8 25
2002-07-22 Viking L 0-2 1795 1725 53.5% 23.9% 22.6% -23.7 24
2002-07-22 @ Rosenborg W 2-0 1725 1795 22.6% 23.9% 53.5% +23.7 25
2002-07-28 Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1733 1629 57.4% 23.2% 19.4% +5.1 28
2002-07-28 @ Stabaek L 1-2 1629 1733 19.4% 23.2% 57.4% -5.1 15
2002-07-28 Bryne W 2-1 1649 1540 57.9% 23.1% 19.0% +5.0 16
2002-07-28 @ Lillestrom L 1-2 1540 1649 19.0% 23.1% 57.9% -5.0 15
2002-07-28 Molde D 0-0 1749 1737 46.3% 24.7% 29.0% -1.0 26
2002-07-28 @ Viking D 0-0 1737 1749 29.0% 24.7% 46.3% +1.0 28
2002-07-28 Moss W 2-0 1678 1573 57.5% 23.2% 19.3% +10.2 29
2002-07-28 @ Odd Grenland L 0-2 1573 1678 19.3% 23.2% 57.5% -10.2 13
2002-07-28 Valerenga W 2-0 1491 1666 22.5% 23.9% 53.6% +23.7 11
2002-07-28 @ Sogndal L 0-2 1666 1491 53.6% 23.9% 22.5% -23.7 20
2002-07-29 Rosenborg L 2-3 1683 1771 32.5% 25.0% 42.6% -7.5 34
2002-07-29 @ Lyn Oslo W 3-2 1771 1683 42.6% 25.0% 32.5% +7.5 27
2002-07-31 Molde W 2-1 1515 1738 18.1% 22.9% 59.0% +12.9 14
2002-07-31 @ Sogndal L 1-2 1738 1515 59.0% 22.9% 18.1% -12.9 28
2002-07-31 Moss W 3-2 1738 1563 64.5% 21.3% 14.1% +3.6 31
2002-07-31 @ Stabaek L 2-3 1563 1738 14.1% 21.3% 64.5% -3.6 13
2002-07-31 Start W 2-0 1624 1500 59.6% 22.7% 17.7% +9.4 18
2002-07-31 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-2 1500 1624 17.7% 22.7% 59.6% -9.4 7
2002-08-01 Lyn Oslo D 0-0 1748 1676 53.8% 23.9% 22.3% -1.9 27
2002-08-01 @ Viking D 0-0 1676 1748 22.3% 23.9% 53.8% +1.8 35
2002-08-01 Rosenborg L 2-3 1664 1779 29.1% 24.8% 46.2% -6.9 20
2002-08-01 @ Brann W 3-2 1779 1664 46.2% 24.8% 29.1% +6.9 30
2002-08-04 Lillestrom W 3-1 1786 1654 60.3% 22.5% 17.1% +7.9 33
2002-08-04 @ Rosenborg L 1-3 1654 1786 17.1% 22.5% 60.3% -7.9 16
2002-08-04 Lyn Oslo W 2-0 1725 1678 50.8% 24.3% 24.9% +12.8 31
2002-08-04 @ Molde L 0-2 1678 1725 24.9% 24.3% 50.8% -12.8 35
2002-08-04 Odd Grenland W 2-0 1490 1688 20.2% 23.4% 56.3% +24.7 10
2002-08-04 @ Start L 0-2 1688 1490 56.3% 23.4% 20.2% -24.8 29
2002-08-04 Sogndal W 2-1 1634 1528 57.6% 23.2% 19.2% +5.1 21
2002-08-04 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1528 1634 19.2% 23.2% 57.6% -5.1 14
2002-08-04 Stabaek W 2-1 1535 1742 19.5% 23.2% 57.3% +12.6 18
2002-08-04 @ Bryne L 1-2 1742 1535 57.3% 23.2% 19.5% -12.6 31
2002-08-04 Viking D 2-2 1559 1746 21.3% 23.7% 55.0% +1.3 14
2002-08-04 @ Moss D 2-2 1746 1559 55.0% 23.7% 21.3% -1.3 28
2002-08-05 Brann D 1-1 1642 1657 42.6% 24.9% 32.4% -0.5 21
2002-08-05 @ Valerenga D 1-1 1657 1642 32.4% 24.9% 42.6% +0.5 21
2002-08-10 Molde L 0-2 1646 1738 31.9% 24.9% 43.1% -15.7 16
2002-08-10 @ Lillestrom W 2-0 1738 1646 43.1% 24.9% 31.9% +15.7 34
2002-08-11 Bryne W 3-2 1794 1547 70.6% 19.1% 10.3% +2.6 36
2002-08-11 @ Rosenborg L 2-3 1547 1794 10.3% 19.1% 70.6% -2.6 18
2002-08-11 Moss L 0-1 1665 1561 57.4% 23.2% 19.4% -13.3 35
2002-08-11 @ Lyn Oslo W 1-0 1561 1665 19.4% 23.2% 57.4% +13.3 17
2002-08-11 Stabaek W 2-0 1523 1729 19.5% 23.2% 57.3% +25.1 17
2002-08-11 @ Sogndal L 0-2 1729 1523 57.3% 23.2% 19.5% -25.1 31
2002-08-11 Start W 4-1 1745 1515 69.2% 19.7% 11.1% +7.2 31
2002-08-11 @ Viking L 1-4 1515 1745 11.1% 19.7% 69.2% -7.2 10
2002-08-11 Valerenga L 1-3 1664 1642 47.6% 24.6% 27.7% -18.5 29
2002-08-11 @ Odd Grenland W 3-1 1642 1664 27.7% 24.6% 47.6% +18.5 24
2002-08-12 Bodo Glimt L 1-3 1658 1639 47.3% 24.7% 28.1% -18.4 21
2002-08-12 @ Brann W 3-1 1639 1658 28.1% 24.7% 47.3% +18.4 24
2002-08-14 Bryne D 1-1 1660 1545 58.6% 23.0% 18.5% -2.2 25
2002-08-14 @ Valerenga D 1-1 1545 1660 18.5% 23.0% 58.6% +2.2 19
2002-08-14 Sogndal L 0-3 1508 1548 39.2% 25.1% 35.8% -26.6 10
2002-08-14 @ Start W 3-0 1548 1508 35.8% 25.1% 39.2% +26.6 20
2002-08-17 Rosenborg L 1-2 1754 1796 38.8% 25.1% 36.1% -9.1 34
2002-08-17 @ Molde W 2-1 1796 1754 36.1% 25.1% 38.8% +9.1 39
2002-08-18 Brann W 1-0 1704 1639 52.9% 24.0% 23.1% +6.4 34
2002-08-18 @ Stabaek L 0-1 1639 1704 23.1% 24.0% 52.9% -6.3 21
2002-08-18 Lillestrom L 0-2 1574 1630 36.9% 25.1% 38.0% -17.5 17
2002-08-18 @ Moss W 2-0 1630 1574 38.0% 25.1% 36.9% +17.5 19
2002-08-18 Lyn Oslo D 2-2 1481 1652 22.9% 24.0% 53.1% +1.2 11
2002-08-18 @ Start D 2-2 1652 1481 53.1% 24.0% 22.9% -1.2 36
2002-08-18 Odd Grenland L 1-3 1657 1645 46.3% 24.7% 28.9% -18.1 24
2002-08-18 @ Bodo Glimt W 3-1 1645 1657 28.9% 24.7% 46.3% +18.1 32
2002-08-18 Sogndal W 3-0 1547 1574 41.0% 25.0% 34.0% +23.9 22
2002-08-18 @ Bryne L 0-3 1574 1547 34.0% 25.0% 41.0% -23.9 20
2002-08-18 Viking D 0-0 1658 1752 31.7% 24.9% 43.4% +0.6 26
2002-08-18 @ Valerenga D 0-0 1752 1658 43.4% 24.9% 31.7% -0.6 32
2002-08-24 Valerenga W 1-0 1650 1659 43.6% 24.9% 31.5% +8.2 39
2002-08-24 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-1 1659 1650 31.5% 24.9% 43.6% -8.2 26
2002-08-25 Bryne W 2-1 1744 1571 64.3% 21.4% 14.2% +3.8 37
2002-08-25 @ Molde L 1-2 1571 1744 14.2% 21.4% 64.3% -3.8 22
2002-08-25 Moss W 2-0 1805 1557 70.8% 19.0% 10.2% +5.3 42
2002-08-25 @ Rosenborg L 0-2 1557 1805 10.2% 19.0% 70.8% -5.3 17
2002-08-25 Sogndal L 2-3 1633 1550 55.0% 23.7% 21.3% -11.5 21
2002-08-25 @ Brann W 3-2 1550 1633 21.3% 23.7% 55.0% +11.5 23
2002-08-25 Stabaek D 1-1 1663 1711 38.1% 25.1% 36.8% -0.1 33
2002-08-25 @ Odd Grenland D 1-1 1711 1663 36.8% 25.1% 38.1% +0.1 35
2002-08-25 Start W 7-0 1648 1482 63.6% 21.6% 14.8% +25.4 22
2002-08-25 @ Lillestrom L 0-7 1482 1648 14.8% 21.6% 63.6% -25.4 11
2002-08-26 Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1751 1639 58.3% 23.0% 18.7% -1.6 33
2002-08-26 @ Viking D 2-2 1639 1751 18.7% 23.0% 58.3% +1.6 25
2002-09-01 Brann W 4-0 1567 1622 37.1% 25.1% 37.8% +33.8 25
2002-09-01 @ Bryne L 0-4 1622 1567 37.8% 25.1% 37.1% -33.8 21
2002-09-01 Lyn Oslo L 0-2 1641 1659 42.3% 25.0% 32.8% -19.4 25
2002-09-01 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-0 1659 1641 32.8% 25.0% 42.3% +19.4 42
2002-09-01 Molde L 2-3 1551 1748 20.4% 23.5% 56.2% -5.1 17
2002-09-01 @ Moss W 3-2 1748 1551 56.2% 23.5% 20.4% +5.1 40
2002-09-01 Odd Grenland W 1-0 1562 1663 30.8% 24.9% 44.4% +10.7 26
2002-09-01 @ Sogndal L 0-1 1663 1562 44.4% 24.9% 30.8% -10.7 33
2002-09-01 Rosenborg L 1-2 1457 1811 10.1% 19.0% 70.9% -2.6 11
2002-09-01 @ Start W 2-1 1811 1457 70.9% 19.0% 10.1% +2.7 45
2002-09-01 Viking L 1-2 1711 1750 39.3% 25.1% 35.6% -9.2 35
2002-09-01 @ Stabaek W 2-1 1750 1711 35.6% 25.1% 39.3% +9.2 36
2002-09-02 Lillestrom D 1-1 1650 1673 41.6% 25.0% 33.4% -0.4 27
2002-09-02 @ Valerenga D 1-1 1673 1650 33.4% 25.0% 41.6% +0.4 23
2002-09-11 Start W 3-1 1588 1454 60.5% 22.5% 17.0% +7.9 24
2002-09-11 @ Brann L 1-3 1454 1588 17.0% 22.5% 60.5% -7.9 11
2002-09-14 Valerenga D 1-1 1813 1650 63.4% 21.7% 14.9% -2.7 46
2002-09-14 @ Rosenborg D 1-1 1650 1813 14.9% 21.7% 63.4% +2.7 28
2002-09-15 Bodo Glimt W 2-0 1673 1621 51.4% 24.2% 24.4% +12.6 26
2002-09-15 @ Lillestrom L 0-2 1621 1673 24.4% 24.2% 51.4% -12.6 25
2002-09-15 Bryne W 1-0 1546 1601 37.1% 25.1% 37.9% +9.5 20
2002-09-15 @ Moss L 0-1 1601 1546 37.9% 25.1% 37.1% -9.5 25
2002-09-15 Sogndal D 1-1 1759 1573 65.5% 21.0% 13.5% -2.9 37
2002-09-15 @ Viking D 1-1 1573 1759 13.5% 21.0% 65.5% +2.9 27
2002-09-15 Stabaek W 2-0 1678 1702 41.5% 25.0% 33.5% +16.3 45
2002-09-15 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-2 1702 1678 33.5% 25.0% 41.5% -16.3 35
2002-09-15 Start W 2-0 1753 1447 75.1% 17.1% 7.8% +4.0 43
2002-09-15 @ Molde L 0-2 1447 1753 7.8% 17.1% 75.1% -4.0 11
2002-09-16 Brann W 2-0 1653 1596 52.0% 24.1% 23.9% +12.3 36
2002-09-16 @ Odd Grenland L 0-2 1596 1653 23.9% 24.1% 52.0% -12.3 24
2002-09-29 Lillestrom D 1-1 1685 1686 44.6% 24.9% 30.5% -0.7 36
2002-09-29 @ Stabaek D 1-1 1686 1685 30.5% 24.9% 44.6% +0.7 27
2002-09-29 Lyn Oslo D 2-2 1576 1694 28.6% 24.7% 46.7% +0.7 28
2002-09-29 @ Sogndal D 2-2 1694 1576 46.7% 24.7% 28.6% -0.7 46
2002-09-29 Molde L 0-3 1653 1757 30.3% 24.8% 44.8% -21.8 28
2002-09-29 @ Valerenga W 3-0 1757 1653 44.8% 24.8% 30.3% +21.8 46
2002-09-29 Moss L 1-6 1443 1556 29.3% 24.8% 46.0% -28.3 11
2002-09-29 @ Start W 6-1 1556 1443 46.0% 24.8% 29.3% +28.3 23
2002-09-29 Odd Grenland D 0-0 1591 1665 34.5% 25.0% 40.5% +0.3 26
2002-09-29 @ Bryne D 0-0 1665 1591 40.5% 25.0% 34.5% -0.3 37
2002-09-29 Rosenborg L 1-4 1609 1811 19.9% 23.4% 56.7% -12.9 25
2002-09-29 @ Bodo Glimt W 4-1 1811 1609 56.7% 23.4% 19.9% +12.9 49
2002-09-30 Viking L 2-3 1583 1756 22.7% 23.9% 53.4% -5.6 24
2002-09-30 @ Brann W 3-2 1756 1583 53.4% 23.9% 22.7% +5.6 40
2002-10-06 Bodo Glimt W 3-0 1779 1596 65.2% 21.1% 13.6% +10.5 49
2002-10-06 @ Molde L 0-3 1596 1779 13.6% 21.1% 65.2% -10.5 25
2002-10-06 Brann L 2-3 1694 1578 58.6% 22.9% 18.4% -12.2 46
2002-10-06 @ Lyn Oslo W 3-2 1578 1694 18.4% 22.9% 58.6% +12.2 27
2002-10-06 Bryne L 0-2 1414 1592 22.2% 23.8% 54.0% -11.6 11
2002-10-06 @ Start W 2-0 1592 1414 54.0% 23.8% 22.2% +11.6 29
2002-10-06 Sogndal W 3-0 1687 1576 58.1% 23.1% 18.9% +14.5 30
2002-10-06 @ Lillestrom L 0-3 1576 1687 18.9% 23.1% 58.1% -14.5 28
2002-10-06 Stabaek W 2-1 1823 1685 61.0% 22.4% 16.6% +4.4 52
2002-10-06 @ Rosenborg L 1-2 1685 1823 16.6% 22.4% 61.0% -4.4 36
2002-10-06 Valerenga D 1-1 1584 1631 38.2% 25.1% 36.8% -0.1 24
2002-10-06 @ Moss D 1-1 1631 1584 36.8% 25.1% 38.2% +0.1 29
2002-10-07 Odd Grenland L 0-3 1761 1665 56.6% 23.4% 20.0% -36.1 40
2002-10-07 @ Viking W 3-0 1665 1761 20.0% 23.4% 56.6% +36.1 40
2002-10-19 Rosenborg D 2-2 1562 1828 15.0% 21.7% 63.3% +2.0 29
2002-10-19 @ Sogndal D 2-2 1828 1562 63.3% 21.7% 15.0% -2.0 53
2002-10-20 Bryne D 1-1 1725 1603 59.3% 22.8% 17.9% -2.2 41
2002-10-20 @ Viking D 1-1 1603 1725 17.9% 22.8% 59.3% +2.2 30
2002-10-20 Lillestrom L 1-2 1590 1701 29.5% 24.8% 45.7% -7.4 27
2002-10-20 @ Brann W 2-1 1701 1590 45.7% 24.8% 29.5% +7.4 33
2002-10-20 Molde W 4-2 1680 1790 29.7% 24.8% 45.5% +16.0 39
2002-10-20 @ Stabaek L 2-4 1790 1680 45.5% 24.8% 29.7% -16.0 49
2002-10-20 Moss W 2-0 1585 1584 44.9% 24.8% 30.3% +15.0 28
2002-10-20 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-2 1584 1585 30.3% 24.8% 44.9% -15.0 24
2002-10-20 Start W 4-0 1631 1403 69.1% 19.7% 11.2% +11.2 32
2002-10-20 @ Valerenga L 0-4 1403 1631 11.2% 19.7% 69.1% -11.2 11
2002-10-21 Lyn Oslo D 1-1 1701 1681 47.3% 24.7% 28.1% -1.0 41
2002-10-21 @ Odd Grenland D 1-1 1681 1701 28.1% 24.7% 47.3% +1.0 47
2002-10-27 Bodo Glimt L 0-3 1392 1600 19.3% 23.2% 57.5% -14.8 11
2002-10-27 @ Start W 3-0 1600 1392 57.5% 23.2% 19.3% +14.8 31
2002-10-27 Brann W 4-0 1826 1583 70.3% 19.2% 10.4% +10.4 56
2002-10-27 @ Rosenborg L 0-4 1583 1826 10.4% 19.2% 70.3% -10.4 27
2002-10-27 Odd Grenland W 3-0 1708 1700 45.9% 24.8% 29.3% +21.3 36
2002-10-27 @ Lillestrom L 0-3 1700 1708 29.3% 24.8% 45.9% -21.3 41
2002-10-27 Sogndal D 3-3 1774 1564 67.6% 20.3% 12.1% -1.9 50
2002-10-27 @ Molde D 3-3 1564 1774 12.1% 20.3% 67.6% +1.9 30
2002-10-27 Stabaek L 2-7 1569 1696 27.6% 24.6% 47.8% -22.6 24
2002-10-27 @ Moss W 7-2 1696 1569 47.8% 24.6% 27.6% +22.6 42
2002-10-27 Valerenga D 2-2 1606 1642 39.7% 25.0% 35.3% -0.2 31
2002-10-27 @ Bryne D 2-2 1642 1606 35.3% 25.0% 39.7% +0.2 33
2002-10-27 Viking L 0-1 1682 1723 39.1% 25.1% 35.9% -9.7 47
2002-10-27 @ Lyn Oslo W 1-0 1723 1682 35.9% 25.1% 39.1% +9.7 44

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 2002-05-16 16.70% Bryne 1522 2 @ Brann 1660 1
2 2002-05-05 16.91% @ Bryne 1522 2 Rosenborg 1761 1
3 2002-07-31 18.13% @ Sogndal 1515 2 Molde 1738 1
4 2002-10-06 18.41% Brann 1578 3 @ Lyn Oslo 1694 2
5 2002-04-14 18.62% Odd Grenland 1654 1 @ Rosenborg 1768 0
6 2002-06-08 18.89% @ Sogndal 1509 5 Lillestrom 1723 2
7 2002-08-11 19.39% Moss 1561 1 @ Lyn Oslo 1665 0
8 2002-08-04 19.46% @ Bryne 1535 2 Stabaek 1742 1
9 2002-08-11 19.49% @ Sogndal 1523 2 Stabaek 1729 0
10 2002-10-07 20.02% Odd Grenland 1665 3 @ Viking 1761 0
11 2002-08-04 20.25% @ Start 1490 2 Odd Grenland 1688 0
12 2002-08-25 21.32% Sogndal 1550 3 @ Brann 1633 2
13 2002-05-05 21.45% Brann 1619 1 @ Bodo Glimt 1700 0
14 2002-06-16 21.53% Brann 1616 1 @ Lillestrom 1696 0
15 2002-07-28 22.47% @ Sogndal 1491 2 Valerenga 1666 0
16 2002-07-22 22.56% Viking 1725 2 @ Rosenborg 1795 0
17 2002-04-21 23.10% Moss 1608 1 @ Brann 1672 0
18 2002-04-21 24.56% @ Lyn Oslo 1596 2 Lillestrom 1750 0
19 2002-06-02 25.18% Start 1520 2 @ Moss 1565 0
20 2002-06-30 26.45% @ Brann 1629 4 Molde 1766 1
21 2002-06-02 26.70% Stabaek 1703 2 @ Lillestrom 1734 1
22 2002-05-11 27.05% Lyn Oslo 1646 2 @ Valerenga 1674 1
23 2002-05-01 27.69% Valerenga 1637 4 @ Brann 1659 0
24 2002-08-11 27.73% Valerenga 1642 3 @ Odd Grenland 1664 1
25 2002-08-12 28.08% Bodo Glimt 1639 3 @ Brann 1658 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 2002-05-01 40.68 Valerenga 4 1637 27.69% @ Brann 0 1659 47.69% 24.62%
2 2002-06-30 36.96 Moss 4 1545 32.62% @ Sogndal 0 1528 42.42% 24.96%
3 2002-10-07 36.10 Odd Grenland 3 1665 20.02% @ Viking 0 1761 56.61% 23.37%
4 2002-05-27 35.79 @ Stabaek 5 1667 44.10% Lyn Oslo 0 1672 31.02% 24.88%
5 2002-09-01 33.84 @ Bryne 4 1567 37.10% Brann 0 1622 37.84% 25.06%
6 2002-09-29 28.31 Moss 6 1556 45.95% @ Start 1 1443 29.29% 24.76%
7 2002-06-08 26.95 @ Sogndal 5 1509 18.89% Lillestrom 2 1723 58.03% 23.08%
8 2002-06-30 26.89 @ Brann 4 1629 26.45% Molde 1 1766 49.06% 24.49%
9 2002-08-14 26.60 Sogndal 3 1548 35.76% @ Start 0 1508 39.19% 25.05%
10 2002-06-16 26.43 @ Lyn Oslo 3 1642 36.09% Odd Grenland 0 1703 38.85% 25.05%
11 2002-08-25 25.37 @ Lillestrom 7 1648 63.56% Start 0 1482 14.79% 21.65%
12 2002-08-11 25.11 @ Sogndal 2 1523 19.49% Stabaek 0 1729 57.26% 23.24%
13 2002-08-04 24.75 @ Start 2 1490 20.25% Odd Grenland 0 1688 56.32% 23.43%
14 2002-08-18 23.89 @ Bryne 3 1547 40.97% Sogndal 0 1574 34.02% 25.01%
15 2002-07-28 23.70 @ Sogndal 2 1491 22.47% Valerenga 0 1666 53.64% 23.90%
16 2002-07-22 23.67 Viking 2 1725 22.56% @ Rosenborg 0 1795 53.52% 23.92%
17 2002-05-26 23.15 Molde 4 1707 52.33% @ Start 0 1544 23.58% 24.09%
18 2002-04-21 22.77 @ Lyn Oslo 2 1596 24.56% Lillestrom 0 1750 51.19% 24.24%
19 2002-10-27 22.56 Stabaek 7 1696 47.81% @ Moss 2 1569 27.58% 24.61%
20 2002-06-02 22.50 Start 2 1520 25.18% @ Moss 0 1565 50.49% 24.33%
21 2002-04-28 22.27 @ Molde 3 1693 44.03% Viking 0 1698 31.09% 24.89%
22 2002-06-16 22.06 Valerenga 7 1662 48.62% @ Start 2 1529 26.84% 24.54%
23 2002-09-29 21.84 Molde 3 1757 44.83% @ Valerenga 0 1653 30.33% 24.84%
24 2002-05-09 21.47 @ Brann 4 1631 37.96% Stabaek 1 1680 36.98% 25.06%
25 2002-10-27 21.27 @ Lillestrom 3 1708 45.89% Odd Grenland 0 1700 29.34% 24.77%