Home / Leagues / Norway / Tippeligaen / 1998
‹ ›

1998 Tippeligaen Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

63 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Stabaek

11.29 points above expected

53 points · 41.71 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Sogndal

7.18 points below expected

16 points · 23.18 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Rosenborg 26 20 3 3 63 79 23 +56 58.12 +4.88
2 Molde 26 16 6 4 54 70 34 +36 49.02 +4.98
3 Stabaek 26 16 5 5 53 63 29 +34 41.71 +11.29
4 Viking 26 14 4 8 46 66 44 +22 44.02 +1.98
5 Bodo Glimt 26 9 9 8 36 47 47 0 38.24 -2.24
6 Brann 26 9 8 9 35 44 39 +5 39.69 -4.69
7 Valerenga 26 10 3 13 33 44 48 -4 28.84 +4.16
8 Lillestrom 26 9 6 11 33 41 49 -8 32.67 +0.33
9 Moss 26 10 2 14 32 36 55 -19 22.80 +9.20
10 Stromsgodset 26 9 5 12 32 40 61 -21 36.41 -4.41
11 Tromso 26 7 7 12 28 39 48 -9 33.30 -5.30
12 Kongsvinger 26 7 5 14 26 35 59 -24 32.59 -6.59
13 Haugesund 26 6 5 15 23 41 55 -14 29.64 -6.64
14 Sogndal 26 4 4 18 16 26 80 -54 23.18 -7.18

Form

Each team's 5-game rolling points-per-game across the season. Hot streaks push above the dashed 1.5 PPG reference line; cold spells drop below. Each team gets a distinct color; the legend below the plot lets you read off which line is which. (First 4 games of each team have no rolling window, so the lines start at game 5.)

League Race

Cumulative points across the season for each team. Highlighted teams are drawn in color (top finishers for the Title Race, bottom finishers for the Relegation Race); the rest of the league appears in light gray as context. Switch views with the buttons below.

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Rosenborg 2018 63 58.12 +4.88 81.5% 37 48 54 58 62 67 78
Stabaek 1871 53 41.71 +11.29 96.5% 16 31 37 42 46 52 67
Molde 1868 54 49.02 +4.98 80.4% 24 39 45 49 53 59 71
Viking 1830 46 44.02 +1.98 64.6% 20 33 40 44 49 55 70
Brann 1796 35 39.69 -4.69 26.5% 16 29 35 40 44 50 64
Bodo Glimt 1753 36 38.24 -2.24 39.5% 14 27 34 38 43 49 63
Valerenga 1724 33 28.84 +4.16 76.5% 7 18 24 29 33 39 55
Lillestrom 1709 33 32.67 +0.33 55.7% 10 22 28 33 37 44 57
Stromsgodset 1675 32 36.41 -4.41 27.8% 14 26 32 36 41 47 59
Tromso 1663 28 33.30 -5.30 23.5% 8 23 29 33 38 44 60
Kongsvinger 1640 26 32.59 -6.59 17.2% 10 22 28 33 37 43 57
Haugesund 1637 23 29.64 -6.64 16.8% 7 20 25 29 34 40 54
Moss 1618 32 22.80 +9.20 93.7% 4 13 19 23 27 33 51
Sogndal 1510 16 23.18 -7.18 13.1% 3 14 19 23 27 33 44

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team BG BRA HAU KON LIL MOL MOS ROS SOG STA STR TRO VAL VIK
Bodo Glimt —
0-1-1
2.65
1-0-1
3.59
0-2-0
3.16
0-2-0
3.12
0-0-2
2.13
2-0-0
3.97
0-0-2
1.32
2-0-0
3.69
0-0-2
2.71
1-1-0
3.05
1-1-0
3.13
1-1-0
3.58
1-1-0
2.22
Brann
1-1-0
2.94
 —
1-1-0
3.65
1-1-0
2.98
0-1-1
3.25
0-2-0
2.23
0-0-2
4.18
0-1-1
1.37
1-0-1
4.17
1-1-0
2.39
1-0-1
3.05
1-0-1
3.20
1-0-1
3.72
1-0-1
2.36
Haugesund
1-0-1
2.00
0-1-1
1.94
 —
1-1-0
2.75
0-0-2
2.68
0-0-2
1.74
1-0-1
3.26
0-0-2
1.01
2-0-0
3.18
0-1-1
1.74
0-1-1
2.33
0-1-1
2.43
1-0-1
2.88
0-0-2
1.65
Kongsvinger
0-2-0
2.43
0-1-1
2.60
0-1-1
2.83
 —
2-0-0
2.75
0-0-2
1.66
0-0-2
3.72
0-0-2
0.87
2-0-0
3.42
0-0-2
2.42
1-0-1
2.51
1-0-1
2.65
1-0-1
3.11
0-1-1
1.69
Lillestrom
0-2-0
2.47
1-1-0
2.34
2-0-0
2.91
0-0-2
2.83
 —
0-1-1
1.68
1-0-1
3.69
0-0-2
1.08
0-1-1
3.81
0-1-1
2.01
1-0-1
2.47
1-0-1
2.58
2-0-0
3.01
1-0-1
1.80
Molde
2-0-0
3.47
0-2-0
3.37
2-0-0
3.88
2-0-0
3.97
1-1-0
3.92
 —
2-0-0
4.52
1-0-1
1.97
2-0-0
4.72
1-1-0
3.32
1-0-1
3.94
1-1-0
4.14
1-0-1
4.44
0-1-1
3.30
Moss
0-0-2
1.64
2-0-0
1.45
1-0-1
2.33
2-0-0
1.88
1-0-1
1.91
0-0-2
1.13
 —
0-0-2
0.73
0-1-1
2.60
1-0-1
1.59
1-0-1
1.78
1-1-0
2.02
1-0-1
2.38
0-0-2
1.37
Rosenborg
2-0-0
4.31
1-1-0
4.27
2-0-0
4.66
2-0-0
4.82
2-0-0
4.58
1-0-1
3.62
2-0-0
4.98
 —
1-0-1
5.10
0-1-1
4.29
2-0-0
4.13
1-1-0
4.62
2-0-0
4.76
2-0-0
3.99
Sogndal
0-0-2
1.91
1-0-1
1.46
0-0-2
2.41
0-0-2
2.17
1-1-0
1.80
0-0-2
0.95
1-1-0
2.98
1-0-1
0.63
 —
0-0-2
1.23
0-1-1
1.85
0-1-1
2.20
0-0-2
2.16
0-0-2
1.51
Stabaek
2-0-0
2.87
0-1-1
3.20
1-1-0
3.88
2-0-0
3.16
1-1-0
3.58
0-1-1
2.27
1-0-1
4.02
1-1-0
1.34
2-0-0
4.41
 —
1-0-1
3.30
2-0-0
3.31
1-0-1
3.81
2-0-0
2.57
Stromsgodset
0-1-1
2.53
1-0-1
2.54
1-1-0
3.25
1-0-1
3.08
1-0-1
3.11
1-0-1
1.67
1-0-1
3.83
0-0-2
1.49
1-1-0
3.75
1-0-1
2.29
 —
1-1-0
3.07
0-1-1
3.32
0-0-2
2.43
Tromso
0-1-1
2.46
1-0-1
2.38
1-1-0
3.16
1-0-1
2.93
1-0-1
3.00
0-1-1
1.48
0-1-1
3.57
0-1-1
1.06
1-1-0
3.40
0-0-2
2.27
0-1-1
2.51
 —
1-0-1
2.99
1-0-1
2.13
Valerenga
0-1-1
2.02
1-0-1
1.87
1-0-1
2.70
1-0-1
2.48
0-0-2
2.57
1-0-1
1.20
1-0-1
3.20
0-0-2
0.92
2-0-0
3.43
1-0-1
1.79
1-1-0
2.26
1-0-1
2.60
 —
0-1-1
1.80
Viking
0-1-1
3.37
1-0-1
3.23
2-0-0
3.96
1-1-0
3.91
1-0-1
3.81
1-1-0
2.29
2-0-0
4.26
0-0-2
1.63
2-0-0
4.12
0-0-2
3.02
2-0-0
3.16
1-0-1
3.46
1-1-0
3.80
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.93 +8.2
Allowed 0.81 -8.2
Differential 0.93 +4.4

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.30%4.95%3.85%3.30%3.02%1.37%19.78%
14.95%8.24%6.04%4.12%2.47%2.20%28.02%
23.85%6.04%7.14%4.67%1.10%1.65%24.45%
33.30%4.12%4.67%—1.10%—13.19%
43.02%2.47%1.10%1.10%1.10%0.27%9.07%
5+1.37%2.20%1.65%—0.27%—5.49%
Total19.78%28.02%24.45%13.19%9.07%5.49%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.84 1.84 +0.00
SD 1.54 1.54 2.37
CV 0.84 0.84 —
Max 9 9 +9
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.54%3.85%3.85%3.85%——23.08%
13.85%7.69%3.85%3.85%——19.23%
2—11.54%11.54%3.85%—3.85%30.77%
33.85%3.85%7.69%———15.38%
4————3.85%3.85%7.69%
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total19.23%26.92%30.77%11.54%3.85%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.81 1.81 +0.00
SD 1.50 1.52 1.70
CV 0.83 0.84 —
Max 6 6 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%11.54%—3.85%——19.23%
1—7.69%7.69%—3.85%—19.23%
27.69%3.85%19.23%3.85%3.85%—38.46%
37.69%3.85%7.69%———19.23%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+———————
Total23.08%26.92%34.62%7.69%7.69%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.69 1.50 +0.19
SD 1.12 1.17 1.74
CV 0.66 0.78 —
Max 4 4 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.69%7.69%3.85%—3.85%23.08%
13.85%15.38%3.85%3.85%11.54%—38.46%
2——3.85%15.38%——19.23%
3—3.85%————3.85%
47.69%—————7.69%
5+—3.85%——3.85%—7.69%
Total11.54%30.77%15.38%23.08%15.38%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.58 2.12 -0.54
SD 1.50 1.42 2.25
CV 0.95 0.67 —
Max 5 5 +4
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%7.69%3.85%11.54%3.85%—34.62%
1—7.69%3.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%23.08%
2—7.69%3.85%—7.69%3.85%23.08%
37.69%—7.69%———15.38%
4———————
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total15.38%23.08%23.08%15.38%15.38%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.35 2.27 -0.92
SD 1.32 1.85 2.30
CV 0.98 0.81 —
Max 5 8 +3
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%—11.54%3.85%—26.92%
13.85%15.38%———3.85%23.08%
23.85%11.54%3.85%7.69%3.85%—30.77%
3——7.69%—3.85%—11.54%
4———————
5+3.85%3.85%————7.69%
Total15.38%38.46%11.54%19.23%11.54%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.58 1.88 -0.31
SD 1.42 1.53 2.24
CV 0.90 0.81 —
Max 5 6 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——3.85%———3.85%
13.85%7.69%—11.54%——23.08%
27.69%7.69%11.54%———26.92%
33.85%—3.85%———7.69%
47.69%19.23%——3.85%—30.77%
5+3.85%—3.85%———7.69%
Total26.92%34.62%23.08%11.54%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.69 1.31 +1.38
SD 1.59 1.12 2.16
CV 0.59 0.86 —
Max 6 4 +6
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%11.54%7.69%—3.85%7.69%34.62%
17.69%3.85%7.69%3.85%—3.85%26.92%
27.69%————3.85%11.54%
33.85%3.85%7.69%—3.85%—19.23%
4——3.85%3.85%——7.69%
5+———————
Total23.08%19.23%26.92%7.69%7.69%15.38%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.38 2.12 -0.73
SD 1.36 1.88 2.43
CV 0.98 0.89 —
Max 4 6 +3
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%—3.85%———7.69%
17.69%3.85%7.69%———19.23%
211.54%3.85%3.85%———19.23%
311.54%7.69%————19.23%
47.69%—3.85%3.85%——15.38%
5+3.85%7.69%7.69%———19.23%
Total46.15%23.08%26.92%3.85%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.04 0.88 +2.15
SD 2.14 0.95 2.20
CV 0.71 1.08 —
Max 8 3 +6
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%——3.85%23.08%3.85%34.62%
13.85%3.85%11.54%7.69%3.85%7.69%38.46%
2—7.69%7.69%3.85%—3.85%23.08%
3———————
4———3.85%——3.85%
5+———————
Total7.69%11.54%19.23%19.23%26.92%15.38%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.00 3.08 -2.08
SD 0.98 1.90 2.37
CV 0.98 0.62 —
Max 4 9 +1
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%7.69%———11.54%
17.69%15.38%3.85%—3.85%—30.77%
27.69%3.85%3.85%———15.38%
3—7.69%7.69%———15.38%
411.54%——3.85%——15.38%
5+3.85%7.69%————11.54%
Total30.77%38.46%23.08%3.85%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.42 1.12 +1.31
SD 2.02 1.03 2.51
CV 0.84 0.93 —
Max 9 4 +9
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——7.69%—3.85%3.85%15.38%
17.69%7.69%7.69%3.85%3.85%7.69%38.46%
23.85%7.69%11.54%3.85%—3.85%30.77%
3—3.85%3.85%———7.69%
4—3.85%3.85%———7.69%
5+———————
Total11.54%23.08%34.62%7.69%7.69%15.38%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.54 2.35 -0.81
SD 1.10 1.83 2.38
CV 0.72 0.78 —
Max 4 7 +3
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%7.69%——3.85%—19.23%
17.69%7.69%11.54%3.85%——30.77%
2—11.54%7.69%11.54%—3.85%34.62%
33.85%3.85%——3.85%—11.54%
4————3.85%—3.85%
5+———————
Total19.23%30.77%19.23%15.38%11.54%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 1.85 -0.35
SD 1.07 1.54 1.55
CV 0.71 0.83 —
Max 4 6 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%7.69%7.69%——19.23%
17.69%3.85%7.69%3.85%3.85%3.85%30.77%
23.85%—7.69%11.54%——23.08%
3—11.54%7.69%———19.23%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+3.85%—————3.85%
Total19.23%19.23%30.77%23.08%3.85%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.69 1.85 -0.15
SD 1.32 1.32 2.20
CV 0.78 0.71 —
Max 5 5 +5
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%————3.85%
13.85%7.69%7.69%11.54%——30.77%
2—7.69%3.85%3.85%——15.38%
33.85%7.69%3.85%—3.85%—19.23%
4—11.54%3.85%—3.85%—19.23%
5+—7.69%3.85%———11.54%
Total7.69%46.15%23.08%15.38%7.69%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.54 1.69 +0.85
SD 1.50 1.09 1.91
CV 0.59 0.64 —
Max 5 4 +4
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 26

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Stabaek 53 41.71 +11.29
2 Moss 32 22.80 +9.20
3 Molde 54 49.02 +4.98
4 Rosenborg 63 58.12 +4.88
5 Valerenga 33 28.84 +4.16

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Sogndal 16 23.18 -7.18
2 Haugesund 23 29.64 -6.64
3 Kongsvinger 26 32.59 -6.59
4 Tromso 28 33.30 -5.30
5 Brann 35 39.69 -4.69

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts W or D consecutively; Winless counts L or D consecutively.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Valerenga 4 Aug 30 – Sep 27 1 in 89
2 Molde 6 May 3 – Jul 1 1 in 78
3 Viking 5 Apr 30 – May 16 1 in 48
4 Sogndal 2 Jul 5 – Jul 9 1 in 45
5 Brann 4 Aug 22 – Sep 20 1 in 44

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Viking 4 Aug 30 – Sep 27 1 in 143
2 Brann 3 May 7 – May 16 1 in 26
3 Stromsgodset 3 Aug 29 – Sep 12 1 in 16
4 Molde 2 Sep 20 – Sep 26 1 in 14
5 Sogndal 4 May 3 – May 16 1 in 14

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Molde 21 Apr 13 – Sep 12 1 in 455
2 Lillestrom 6 May 16 – Jul 12 1 in 23
3 Stabaek 8 Aug 23 – Oct 25 1 in 18
4 Bodo Glimt 5 May 16 – Jul 12 1 in 13
5 Valerenga 4 Aug 30 – Sep 27 1 in 12

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Brann 11 Apr 13 – Jul 5 1 in 1,296
2 Sogndal 10 Apr 13 – Jul 1 1 in 40
3 Stromsgodset 6 Apr 13 – May 7 1 in 32
4 Tromso 8 Aug 22 – Oct 25 1 in 22
5 Viking 4 Aug 30 – Sep 27 1 in 16

Finish Position Heatmap

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team1234567891011121314
Rosenborg79.23%14.79%3.89%1.29%0.53%0.17%0.09%0.01%——————
Molde12.73%41.83%20.24%11.66%6.42%3.48%1.87%0.85%0.50%0.27%0.11%0.02%0.02%—
Stabaek1.94%11.23%17.92%17.21%14.91%11.74%8.67%6.27%4.20%3.11%1.54%0.76%0.45%0.05%
Viking3.93%16.65%23.09%18.09%13.22%9.08%5.93%4.34%2.58%1.49%1.00%0.45%0.14%0.01%
Bodo Glimt0.59%4.14%8.87%12.22%14.68%13.57%12.62%10.08%8.28%6.07%4.29%2.76%1.40%0.43%
Brann1.01%6.09%12.39%14.97%14.93%13.86%10.98%9.05%6.38%4.76%2.91%1.63%0.77%0.27%
Valerenga—0.22%0.64%1.37%2.62%4.34%6.25%8.67%10.84%12.28%14.31%16.48%13.20%8.78%
Lillestrom0.07%0.81%2.22%3.91%6.28%8.13%10.57%12.00%12.76%12.46%12.15%9.37%6.08%3.19%
Moss0.01%0.02%0.04%0.14%0.27%0.68%1.28%2.04%3.26%5.91%9.36%14.66%26.03%36.30%
Stromsgodset0.30%2.54%5.51%8.78%10.50%12.73%12.53%12.28%10.68%8.42%7.04%4.86%2.76%1.07%
Tromso0.10%0.98%2.63%4.64%6.92%8.77%11.26%12.22%12.85%12.35%10.69%8.80%5.33%2.46%
Kongsvinger0.07%0.53%1.81%3.84%5.70%7.87%10.15%11.18%12.77%13.47%12.41%10.01%6.55%3.64%
Haugesund0.02%0.16%0.72%1.72%2.67%4.81%6.54%8.94%11.25%13.51%15.00%15.51%12.04%7.11%
Sogndal—0.01%0.03%0.16%0.35%0.77%1.26%2.07%3.65%5.90%9.19%14.69%25.23%36.69%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Points Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 5% * Slight Edge: 5% to 15% * Clear Edge: 15% to 25% * Strong Edge: 25% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+14.29%
Slight Edge
47.25%19.78%32.97%
Elo Value
Home Edge
129 Elo
0.008 goals per Elo point
049.98400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.35 goals
Neutral
-2+0.39+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.15 * Tight Race: 0.15 to 0.4 * Comfortable: 0.4 to 0.75 * Runaway: 0.75 and up.
Title-Race Openness
1.5
One-Team Race
124610
Champion Preseason Odds
79%
Rosenborg, 1st of 14
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.35/gm
Tight Race
00.300.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 5.11 * Some Luck: 5.11 to 7.67 * Lucky: 7.67 to 10.23 * Wild Swing: 10.23 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.48 * Close: 1.48 to 2.22 * Off: 2.22 to 2.97 * Way Off: 2.97 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
5.95 points
Some Luck
06.3916
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.86
Close
01.854
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 96.43%
96.53%
Stabaek
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 3.57%
13.13%
Sogndal
050
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 14
Minimal Outliers
01.47

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.12 * Even: 0.12 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.26 * Lopsided: 0.26 and up.
Noll-Scully
How much more spread out the table was than a league where every match is a coin flip. The gold line at 1 is that coin-flip baseline. Above it, real talent gaps stretched the table; below it, the league was tighter than luck alone would produce.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1 * Moderate Separation: 1 to 1.6 * Strong Separation: 1.6 to 2.2 * Wide Separation: 2.2 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 60% * Slight Edge: 60% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 80% * Wide Edge: 80% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 82% * Strong Edge: 82% to 92% * Dominant: 92% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 30% * Some Drama: 30% to 40% * Frequent: 40% to 50% * Very Frequent: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 8% * Occasional: 8% to 14% * Frequent: 14% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.19
Top-Heavy
00.120.180.260.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.71
Strong Separation
01.003
Interquartile Edge
73%
Clear Edge
50%60%70%80%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 94%
95%
Dominant
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
54%
Very Frequent
0%47%100%
Blowouts
Expected
28%
Very Frequent
0%29%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.1 * Slight Separation: 0.1 to 0.18 * Notable Separation: 0.18 to 0.28 * Lopsided: 0.28 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.3 * Some Carryover: 0.3 to 0.6 * Strong Carryover: 0.6 to 0.85 * Near-Lock: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 25% * As Expected: 25% to 33% * Upset-Prone: 33% to 42% * Very Upset-Prone: 42% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 15% * As Expected: 15% to 25% * Shaky Favorites: 25% to 35% * Very Shaky: 35% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.57
Predictable
00.582
Matchup Imbalance
0.36
Lopsided
00.10.180.280.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.89
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.71
Strong Carryover
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
24%
Chalky
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
22%
As Expected
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.18 * Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.25 * Well Above Noise: 0.25 and up.
Probability calibration
0.88
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.98
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.055
Well Within Noise
00.1230.3

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Qualified for relegation playoff Direct relegation
Rosenborg 100% — —
Molde 99.96% 0.02% 0.02%
Viking 99.40% 0.45% 0.15%
Stabaek 98.74% 0.76% 0.50%
Brann 97.33% 1.63% 1.04%
Bodo Glimt 95.41% 2.76% 1.83%
Stromsgodset 91.31% 4.86% 3.83%
Tromso 83.41% 8.80% 7.79%
Lillestrom 81.36% 9.37% 9.27%
Kongsvinger 79.80% 10.01% 10.19%
Haugesund 65.34% 15.51% 19.15%
Valerenga 61.54% 16.48% 21.98%
Sogndal 23.39% 14.69% 61.92%
Moss 23.01% 14.66% 62.33%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss % Elo Δ Points
1998-04-13 Moss L 0-1 1803 1576 70.8% 17.2% 12.1% -12.8 0
1998-04-13 @ Brann W 1-0 1576 1803 12.1% 17.2% 70.8% +12.8 3
1998-04-13 Molde L 2-3 1683 1786 32.2% 20.8% 46.9% -5.9 0
1998-04-13 @ Haugesund W 3-2 1786 1683 46.9% 20.8% 32.2% +5.9 3
1998-04-13 Kongsvinger L 0-3 1717 1725 45.5% 20.9% 33.7% -23.7 0
1998-04-13 @ Lillestrom W 3-0 1725 1717 33.7% 20.9% 45.5% +23.7 3
1998-04-13 Tromso D 0-0 1662 1699 41.3% 21.0% 37.7% -0.2 1
1998-04-13 @ Sogndal D 0-0 1699 1662 37.7% 21.0% 41.3% +0.2 1
1998-04-13 Bodo Glimt W 3-2 1741 1753 44.9% 20.9% 34.2% +6.1 3
1998-04-13 @ Stabaek L 2-3 1753 1741 34.2% 20.9% 44.9% -6.1 0
1998-04-13 Rosenborg L 0-2 1776 1941 25.0% 20.2% 54.7% -9.9 0
1998-04-13 @ Stromsgodset W 2-0 1941 1776 54.7% 20.2% 25.0% +9.9 3
1998-04-13 Valerenga W 3-0 1771 1677 58.1% 19.9% 22.1% +12.9 3
1998-04-13 @ Viking L 0-3 1677 1771 22.1% 19.9% 58.1% -12.9 0
1998-04-18 Lillestrom W 4-0 1792 1694 58.7% 19.8% 21.6% +16.5 6
1998-04-18 @ Molde L 0-4 1694 1792 21.6% 19.8% 58.7% -16.5 0
1998-04-19 Sogndal W 3-0 1747 1662 57.1% 20.0% 22.9% +13.3 3
1998-04-19 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-3 1662 1747 22.9% 20.0% 57.1% -13.3 1
1998-04-19 Brann D 2-2 1749 1790 40.8% 21.0% 38.2% -0.1 4
1998-04-19 @ Kongsvinger D 2-2 1790 1749 38.2% 21.0% 40.8% +0.1 1
1998-04-19 Stabaek W 1-0 1589 1748 25.6% 20.3% 54.1% +10.0 6
1998-04-19 @ Moss L 0-1 1748 1589 54.1% 20.3% 25.6% -10.0 3
1998-04-19 Viking W 3-1 1951 1784 65.6% 18.5% 15.9% +5.6 6
1998-04-19 @ Rosenborg L 1-3 1784 1951 15.9% 18.5% 65.6% -5.6 3
1998-04-19 Stromsgodset D 2-2 1700 1767 37.1% 21.0% 41.9% +0.2 2
1998-04-19 @ Tromso D 2-2 1767 1700 41.9% 21.0% 37.1% -0.1 1
1998-04-19 Haugesund W 3-2 1665 1677 44.8% 20.9% 34.3% +6.2 3
1998-04-19 @ Valerenga L 2-3 1677 1665 34.3% 20.9% 44.8% -6.2 0
1998-04-26 Moss W 2-1 1760 1599 65.1% 18.6% 16.3% +3.3 6
1998-04-26 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1599 1760 16.3% 18.6% 65.1% -3.3 6
1998-04-26 Molde D 2-2 1790 1809 43.9% 20.9% 35.1% -0.3 2
1998-04-26 @ Brann D 2-2 1809 1790 35.1% 20.9% 43.9% +0.3 7
1998-04-26 Rosenborg L 0-3 1671 1956 14.6% 18.1% 67.3% -8.7 0
1998-04-26 @ Haugesund W 3-0 1956 1671 67.3% 18.1% 14.6% +8.7 9
1998-04-26 Stromsgodset D 2-2 1649 1766 30.4% 20.7% 48.9% +0.6 2
1998-04-26 @ Sogndal D 2-2 1766 1649 48.9% 20.7% 30.4% -0.6 2
1998-04-26 Kongsvinger W 2-1 1738 1749 45.0% 20.9% 34.1% +6.5 6
1998-04-26 @ Stabaek L 1-2 1749 1738 34.1% 20.9% 45.0% -6.5 4
1998-04-26 Tromso L 1-2 1778 1700 56.4% 20.1% 23.5% -9.8 3
1998-04-26 @ Viking W 2-1 1700 1778 23.5% 20.1% 56.4% +9.8 5
1998-04-27 Valerenga W 3-2 1677 1671 47.4% 20.8% 31.8% +5.8 3
1998-04-27 @ Lillestrom L 2-3 1671 1677 31.8% 20.8% 47.4% -5.8 3
1998-04-30 Bodo Glimt D 0-0 1742 1764 43.6% 20.9% 35.5% -0.4 5
1998-04-30 @ Kongsvinger D 0-0 1764 1742 35.5% 20.9% 43.6% +0.4 7
1998-04-30 Stabaek D 1-1 1809 1744 54.8% 20.2% 25.0% -1.3 8
1998-04-30 @ Molde D 1-1 1744 1809 25.0% 20.2% 54.8% +1.3 7
1998-04-30 Sogndal D 1-1 1595 1649 39.0% 21.0% 40.1% +0.0 7
1998-04-30 @ Moss D 1-1 1649 1595 40.1% 21.0% 39.0% -0.0 3
1998-04-30 Lillestrom W 6-1 1965 1683 74.9% 15.8% 9.3% +7.3 12
1998-04-30 @ Rosenborg L 1-6 1683 1965 9.3% 15.8% 74.9% -7.3 3
1998-04-30 Viking L 1-5 1766 1768 46.2% 20.8% 33.0% -26.1 2
1998-04-30 @ Stromsgodset W 5-1 1768 1766 33.0% 20.8% 46.2% +26.1 6
1998-04-30 Haugesund W 2-1 1710 1662 52.6% 20.4% 26.9% +5.3 8
1998-04-30 @ Tromso L 1-2 1662 1710 26.9% 20.4% 52.6% -5.3 0
1998-04-30 Brann W 3-2 1665 1790 29.5% 20.7% 49.8% +8.3 6
1998-04-30 @ Valerenga L 2-3 1790 1665 49.8% 20.7% 29.5% -8.4 2
1998-05-03 Molde L 0-2 1764 1808 40.4% 21.0% 38.6% -14.8 7
1998-05-03 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-0 1808 1764 38.6% 21.0% 40.4% +14.8 11
1998-05-03 Stromsgodset D 1-1 1657 1740 35.0% 20.9% 44.1% +0.4 1
1998-05-03 @ Haugesund D 1-1 1740 1657 44.1% 20.9% 35.0% -0.4 3
1998-05-03 Tromso W 2-1 1676 1715 41.1% 21.0% 37.9% +7.0 6
1998-05-03 @ Lillestrom L 1-2 1715 1676 37.9% 21.0% 41.1% -7.0 8
1998-05-03 Kongsvinger W 2-0 1595 1742 27.0% 20.5% 52.5% +18.5 10
1998-05-03 @ Moss L 0-2 1742 1595 52.5% 20.5% 27.0% -18.5 5
1998-05-03 Viking L 1-2 1649 1794 27.1% 20.5% 52.4% -5.3 3
1998-05-03 @ Sogndal W 2-1 1794 1649 52.4% 20.5% 27.1% +5.3 9
1998-05-03 Valerenga W 2-0 1745 1673 55.6% 20.2% 24.2% +9.6 10
1998-05-03 @ Stabaek L 0-2 1673 1745 24.2% 20.2% 55.6% -9.6 6
1998-05-04 Rosenborg D 0-0 1781 1972 22.3% 19.9% 57.8% +1.7 3
1998-05-04 @ Brann D 0-0 1972 1781 57.8% 19.9% 22.3% -1.7 13
1998-05-07 Sogndal W 3-2 1723 1644 56.5% 20.1% 23.4% +4.4 8
1998-05-07 @ Kongsvinger L 2-3 1644 1723 23.4% 20.1% 56.5% -4.4 3
1998-05-07 Moss W 6-0 1822 1614 69.3% 17.6% 13.1% +14.9 14
1998-05-07 @ Molde L 0-6 1614 1822 13.1% 17.6% 69.3% -14.9 10
1998-05-07 Stabaek D 2-2 1970 1755 69.8% 17.4% 12.7% -1.9 14
1998-05-07 @ Rosenborg D 2-2 1755 1970 12.7% 17.4% 69.8% +1.9 11
1998-05-07 Lillestrom L 2-3 1739 1683 53.8% 20.3% 25.9% -8.9 3
1998-05-07 @ Stromsgodset W 3-2 1683 1739 25.9% 20.3% 53.8% +9.0 9
1998-05-07 Brann W 1-0 1708 1783 36.0% 20.9% 43.1% +8.3 11
1998-05-07 @ Tromso L 0-1 1783 1708 43.1% 20.9% 36.0% -8.3 3
1998-05-07 Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1664 1749 34.6% 20.9% 44.5% +0.3 7
1998-05-07 @ Valerenga D 2-2 1749 1664 44.5% 20.9% 34.6% -0.3 8
1998-05-07 Haugesund W 3-1 1800 1658 63.2% 19.0% 17.8% +6.3 12
1998-05-07 @ Viking L 1-3 1658 1800 17.8% 19.0% 63.2% -6.3 1
1998-05-10 Rosenborg L 2-6 1749 1969 19.6% 19.4% 61.0% -10.7 8
1998-05-10 @ Bodo Glimt W 6-2 1969 1749 61.0% 19.4% 19.6% +10.7 17
1998-05-10 Stromsgodset L 0-1 1775 1730 52.3% 20.5% 27.2% -9.8 3
1998-05-10 @ Brann W 1-0 1730 1775 27.2% 20.5% 52.3% +9.8 6
1998-05-10 Molde L 0-3 1728 1837 31.4% 20.8% 47.8% -17.5 8
1998-05-10 @ Kongsvinger W 3-0 1837 1728 47.8% 20.8% 31.4% +17.5 17
1998-05-10 Viking L 2-3 1692 1806 30.8% 20.7% 48.4% -5.6 9
1998-05-10 @ Lillestrom W 3-2 1806 1692 48.4% 20.7% 30.8% +5.6 15
1998-05-10 Haugesund L 0-4 1640 1651 44.9% 20.9% 34.2% -30.6 3
1998-05-10 @ Sogndal W 4-0 1651 1640 34.2% 20.9% 44.9% +30.6 4
1998-05-10 Tromso W 1-0 1757 1716 51.8% 20.5% 27.6% +5.7 14
1998-05-10 @ Stabaek L 0-1 1716 1757 27.6% 20.5% 51.8% -5.7 11
1998-05-11 Valerenga W 3-2 1599 1664 37.4% 21.0% 41.6% +7.2 13
1998-05-11 @ Moss L 2-3 1664 1599 41.6% 21.0% 37.4% -7.2 7
1998-05-16 Viking L 1-4 1765 1812 40.0% 21.0% 39.0% -18.0 3
1998-05-16 @ Brann W 4-1 1812 1765 39.0% 21.0% 40.0% +18.0 18
1998-05-16 Lillestrom L 0-2 1682 1686 45.9% 20.9% 33.2% -16.4 4
1998-05-16 @ Haugesund W 2-0 1686 1682 33.2% 20.9% 45.9% +16.4 12
1998-05-16 Sogndal W 4-0 1855 1609 72.3% 16.7% 11.1% +8.5 20
1998-05-16 @ Molde L 0-4 1609 1855 11.1% 16.7% 72.3% -8.5 3
1998-05-16 Moss W 6-0 1979 1606 80.5% 13.4% 6.1% +6.5 20
1998-05-16 @ Rosenborg L 0-6 1606 1979 6.1% 13.4% 80.5% -6.5 13
1998-05-16 Stabaek W 2-1 1740 1763 43.4% 20.9% 35.6% +6.7 9
1998-05-16 @ Stromsgodset L 1-2 1763 1740 35.6% 20.9% 43.4% -6.7 14
1998-05-16 Bodo Glimt D 4-4 1710 1738 42.7% 20.9% 36.4% -0.1 12
1998-05-16 @ Tromso D 4-4 1738 1710 36.4% 20.9% 42.7% +0.1 9
1998-05-16 Kongsvinger L 2-3 1657 1710 39.0% 21.0% 40.0% -6.8 7
1998-05-16 @ Valerenga W 3-2 1710 1657 40.0% 21.0% 39.0% +6.8 11
1998-06-07 Haugesund D 2-2 1747 1665 56.7% 20.0% 23.2% -1.1 4
1998-06-07 @ Brann D 2-2 1665 1747 23.2% 20.0% 56.7% +1.1 5
1998-06-07 Valerenga W 4-1 1863 1650 69.7% 17.5% 12.8% +6.4 23
1998-06-07 @ Molde L 1-4 1650 1863 12.8% 17.5% 69.7% -6.4 7
1998-06-07 Tromso W 3-2 1600 1710 31.3% 20.8% 47.9% +8.1 16
1998-06-07 @ Moss L 2-3 1710 1600 47.9% 20.8% 31.3% -8.1 12
1998-06-07 Lillestrom D 2-2 1600 1703 32.4% 20.8% 46.8% +0.4 4
1998-06-07 @ Sogndal D 2-2 1703 1600 46.8% 20.8% 32.4% -0.4 13
1998-06-07 Stabaek L 1-3 1830 1756 55.8% 20.1% 24.0% -16.9 18
1998-06-07 @ Viking W 3-1 1756 1830 24.0% 20.1% 55.8% +16.9 17
1998-07-01 Stabaek L 0-1 1667 1773 31.8% 20.8% 47.4% -6.5 5
1998-07-01 @ Haugesund W 1-0 1773 1667 47.4% 20.8% 31.8% +6.5 20
1998-07-01 Brann D 1-1 1702 1746 40.4% 21.0% 38.6% -0.1 14
1998-07-01 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1746 1702 38.6% 21.0% 40.4% +0.1 5
1998-07-01 Molde L 1-2 1986 1870 60.6% 19.5% 20.0% -10.5 20
1998-07-01 @ Rosenborg W 2-1 1870 1986 20.0% 19.5% 60.6% +10.5 26
1998-07-01 Moss W 2-0 1747 1608 62.9% 19.1% 18.0% +7.3 12
1998-07-01 @ Stromsgodset L 0-2 1608 1747 18.0% 19.1% 62.9% -7.3 16
1998-07-01 Kongsvinger W 3-0 1702 1717 44.5% 20.9% 34.6% +19.0 15
1998-07-01 @ Tromso L 0-3 1717 1702 34.6% 20.9% 44.5% -19.0 11
1998-07-01 Sogndal W 4-0 1644 1601 52.1% 20.5% 27.4% +20.4 10
1998-07-01 @ Valerenga L 0-4 1601 1644 27.4% 20.5% 52.1% -20.4 4
1998-07-01 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1813 1738 55.9% 20.1% 23.9% -1.4 19
1998-07-01 @ Viking D 1-1 1738 1813 23.9% 20.1% 55.9% +1.4 10
1998-07-04 Lillestrom D 1-1 1779 1702 56.2% 20.1% 23.7% -1.4 21
1998-07-04 @ Stabaek D 1-1 1702 1779 23.7% 20.1% 56.2% +1.4 15
1998-07-05 Haugesund W 3-2 1740 1660 56.5% 20.1% 23.4% +4.4 13
1998-07-05 @ Bodo Glimt L 2-3 1660 1740 23.4% 20.1% 56.5% -4.4 5
1998-07-05 Tromso D 2-2 1880 1721 64.9% 18.7% 16.4% -1.6 27
1998-07-05 @ Molde D 2-2 1721 1880 16.4% 18.7% 64.9% +1.6 16
1998-07-05 Viking L 0-1 1601 1811 20.4% 19.6% 60.0% -4.4 16
1998-07-05 @ Moss W 1-0 1811 1601 60.0% 19.6% 20.4% +4.4 22
1998-07-05 Brann W 2-1 1580 1746 24.9% 20.2% 54.9% +9.6 7
1998-07-05 @ Sogndal L 1-2 1746 1580 54.9% 20.2% 24.9% -9.6 5
1998-07-05 Rosenborg L 0-2 1664 1975 13.0% 17.5% 69.5% -5.3 10
1998-07-05 @ Valerenga W 2-0 1975 1664 69.5% 17.5% 13.0% +5.3 23
1998-07-09 Stabaek W 2-0 1736 1778 40.7% 21.0% 38.3% +14.2 8
1998-07-09 @ Brann L 0-2 1778 1736 38.3% 21.0% 40.7% -14.2 21
1998-07-09 Moss W 5-1 1656 1596 54.1% 20.3% 25.5% +16.0 8
1998-07-09 @ Haugesund L 1-5 1596 1656 25.5% 20.3% 54.1% -16.0 16
1998-07-09 Bodo Glimt D 0-0 1703 1744 40.9% 21.0% 38.2% -0.1 16
1998-07-09 @ Lillestrom D 0-0 1744 1703 38.2% 21.0% 40.9% +0.1 14
1998-07-09 Rosenborg W 2-1 1590 1980 9.0% 15.6% 75.5% +12.7 10
1998-07-09 @ Sogndal L 1-2 1980 1590 75.5% 15.6% 9.0% -12.7 23
1998-07-09 Molde L 1-2 1754 1879 29.6% 20.7% 49.8% -5.7 12
1998-07-09 @ Stromsgodset W 2-1 1879 1754 49.8% 20.7% 29.6% +5.7 30
1998-07-09 Valerenga W 2-1 1723 1659 54.7% 20.2% 25.1% +5.0 19
1998-07-09 @ Tromso L 1-2 1659 1723 25.1% 20.2% 54.7% -5.0 10
1998-07-09 Kongsvinger W 4-2 1816 1698 60.7% 19.5% 19.8% +6.2 25
1998-07-09 @ Viking L 2-4 1698 1816 19.8% 19.5% 60.7% -6.2 11
1998-07-12 Brann D 2-2 1744 1751 45.6% 20.9% 33.5% -0.4 15
1998-07-12 @ Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1751 1744 33.5% 20.9% 45.6% +0.4 9
1998-07-12 Lillestrom L 1-2 1580 1703 29.7% 20.7% 49.6% -5.8 16
1998-07-12 @ Moss W 2-1 1703 1580 49.6% 20.7% 29.7% +5.8 19
1998-07-12 Sogndal W 5-1 1764 1603 65.0% 18.6% 16.3% +10.5 24
1998-07-12 @ Stabaek L 1-5 1603 1764 16.3% 18.6% 65.0% -10.5 10
1998-07-12 Rosenborg L 3-4 1728 1968 17.9% 19.1% 63.0% -3.4 19
1998-07-12 @ Tromso W 4-3 1968 1728 63.0% 19.1% 17.9% +3.4 26
1998-07-13 Viking D 4-4 1884 1822 54.5% 20.3% 25.2% -0.7 31
1998-07-13 @ Molde D 4-4 1822 1884 25.2% 20.3% 54.5% +0.7 26
1998-07-13 Stromsgodset D 1-1 1654 1748 33.3% 20.9% 45.8% +0.5 11
1998-07-13 @ Valerenga D 1-1 1748 1654 45.8% 20.9% 33.3% -0.5 13
1998-07-19 Stabaek L 1-3 1744 1774 42.3% 20.9% 36.7% -13.3 15
1998-07-19 @ Bodo Glimt W 3-1 1774 1744 36.7% 20.9% 42.3% +13.3 27
1998-07-19 Lillestrom W 3-0 1692 1709 44.1% 20.9% 34.9% +19.1 14
1998-07-19 @ Kongsvinger L 0-3 1709 1692 34.9% 20.9% 44.1% -19.1 19
1998-07-19 Haugesund W 4-1 1884 1672 69.6% 17.5% 12.9% +6.5 34
1998-07-19 @ Molde L 1-4 1672 1884 12.9% 17.5% 69.6% -6.4 8
1998-07-19 Brann W 3-0 1574 1751 23.7% 20.1% 56.2% +28.5 19
1998-07-19 @ Moss L 0-3 1751 1574 56.2% 20.1% 23.7% -28.5 9
1998-07-19 Stromsgodset W 7-1 1971 1748 70.5% 17.2% 12.3% +11.5 29
1998-07-19 @ Rosenborg L 1-7 1748 1971 12.3% 17.2% 70.5% -11.5 13
1998-07-19 Sogndal W 3-1 1724 1592 62.2% 19.2% 18.6% +6.5 22
1998-07-19 @ Tromso L 1-3 1592 1724 18.6% 19.2% 62.2% -6.5 10
1998-07-19 Viking D 2-2 1654 1823 24.6% 20.2% 55.2% +1.0 12
1998-07-19 @ Valerenga D 2-2 1823 1654 55.2% 20.2% 24.6% -1.0 27
1998-07-22 Stromsgodset W 2-1 1711 1736 43.0% 20.9% 36.1% +6.8 17
1998-07-22 @ Kongsvinger L 1-2 1736 1711 36.1% 20.9% 43.0% -6.8 13
1998-07-25 Rosenborg L 1-2 1822 1983 25.4% 20.3% 54.3% -5.0 27
1998-07-25 @ Viking W 2-1 1983 1822 54.3% 20.3% 25.4% +5.0 32
1998-07-26 Kongsvinger W 3-0 1722 1718 47.1% 20.8% 32.0% +17.8 12
1998-07-26 @ Brann L 0-3 1718 1722 32.0% 20.8% 47.1% -17.8 17
1998-07-26 Valerenga W 3-1 1665 1655 47.9% 20.8% 31.4% +10.4 11
1998-07-26 @ Haugesund L 1-3 1655 1665 31.4% 20.8% 47.9% -10.4 12
1998-07-26 Molde D 1-1 1690 1890 21.4% 19.7% 58.9% +1.6 20
1998-07-26 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1890 1690 58.9% 19.7% 21.4% -1.6 35
1998-07-26 Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1586 1730 27.2% 20.5% 52.3% -5.3 10
1998-07-26 @ Sogndal W 2-1 1730 1586 52.3% 20.5% 27.2% +5.3 18
1998-07-26 Moss W 4-0 1787 1603 67.2% 18.1% 14.6% +11.4 30
1998-07-26 @ Stabaek L 0-4 1603 1787 14.6% 18.1% 67.2% -11.4 19
1998-07-26 Tromso W 3-2 1730 1731 46.4% 20.8% 32.8% +5.9 16
1998-07-26 @ Stromsgodset L 2-3 1731 1730 32.8% 20.8% 46.4% -5.9 22
1998-07-30 Stromsgodset W 6-2 1736 1736 46.5% 20.8% 32.6% +16.7 21
1998-07-30 @ Bodo Glimt L 2-6 1736 1736 32.6% 20.8% 46.5% -16.7 16
1998-08-01 Brann D 2-2 1889 1740 63.8% 18.9% 17.3% -1.5 36
1998-08-01 @ Molde D 2-2 1740 1889 17.3% 18.9% 63.8% +1.5 13
1998-08-02 Stabaek L 1-5 1700 1799 32.8% 20.8% 46.4% -19.8 17
1998-08-02 @ Kongsvinger W 5-1 1799 1700 46.4% 20.8% 32.8% +19.8 33
1998-08-02 Bodo Glimt L 0-1 1592 1753 25.4% 20.3% 54.3% -5.3 19
1998-08-02 @ Moss W 1-0 1753 1592 54.3% 20.3% 25.4% +5.3 24
1998-08-02 Haugesund W 1-0 1988 1676 76.9% 15.0% 8.1% +1.7 35
1998-08-02 @ Rosenborg L 0-1 1676 1988 8.1% 15.0% 76.9% -1.7 11
1998-08-02 Sogndal W 2-1 1719 1580 62.9% 19.1% 18.1% +3.7 19
1998-08-02 @ Stromsgodset L 1-2 1580 1719 18.1% 19.1% 62.9% -3.7 10
1998-08-02 Viking L 1-2 1725 1817 33.7% 20.9% 45.4% -6.4 22
1998-08-02 @ Tromso W 2-1 1817 1725 45.4% 20.9% 33.7% +6.4 30
1998-08-02 Lillestrom L 1-5 1645 1692 40.0% 21.0% 39.1% -23.2 12
1998-08-02 @ Valerenga W 5-1 1692 1645 39.1% 21.0% 40.0% +23.2 23
1998-08-08 Valerenga W 3-0 1742 1622 61.0% 19.4% 19.6% +11.5 16
1998-08-08 @ Brann L 0-3 1622 1742 19.6% 19.4% 61.0% -11.5 12
1998-08-08 Molde L 1-4 1819 1887 36.9% 21.0% 42.1% -16.9 33
1998-08-08 @ Stabaek W 4-1 1887 1819 42.1% 21.0% 36.9% +16.9 39
1998-08-08 Stromsgodset W 4-1 1823 1723 58.9% 19.7% 21.4% +10.5 33
1998-08-08 @ Viking L 1-4 1723 1823 21.4% 19.7% 58.9% -10.5 19
1998-08-09 Kongsvinger D 0-0 1758 1680 56.3% 20.1% 23.6% -1.6 25
1998-08-09 @ Bodo Glimt D 0-0 1680 1758 23.6% 20.1% 56.3% +1.6 18
1998-08-09 Tromso D 1-1 1674 1718 40.3% 21.0% 38.7% -0.1 12
1998-08-09 @ Haugesund D 1-1 1718 1674 38.7% 21.0% 40.3% +0.1 23
1998-08-09 Rosenborg L 0-3 1715 1989 15.3% 18.4% 66.3% -9.1 23
1998-08-09 @ Lillestrom W 3-0 1989 1715 66.3% 18.4% 15.3% +9.1 38
1998-08-09 Moss W 4-3 1577 1586 45.2% 20.9% 33.9% +6.0 13
1998-08-09 @ Sogndal L 3-4 1586 1577 33.9% 20.9% 45.2% -6.0 19
1998-08-12 Haugesund L 0-1 1682 1674 47.6% 20.8% 31.6% -9.0 18
1998-08-12 @ Kongsvinger W 1-0 1674 1682 31.6% 20.8% 47.6% +9.0 15
1998-08-15 Brann W 4-2 1998 1753 72.2% 16.7% 11.1% +3.5 41
1998-08-15 @ Rosenborg L 2-4 1753 1998 11.1% 16.7% 72.2% -3.5 16
1998-08-16 Moss L 2-4 1673 1580 58.0% 19.9% 22.1% -15.6 18
1998-08-16 @ Kongsvinger W 4-2 1580 1673 22.1% 19.9% 58.0% +15.6 22
1998-08-16 Bodo Glimt W 1-0 1904 1756 63.8% 18.9% 17.3% +3.7 42
1998-08-16 @ Molde L 0-1 1756 1904 17.3% 18.9% 63.8% -3.7 25
1998-08-16 Haugesund W 4-1 1712 1683 50.4% 20.6% 29.0% +13.8 22
1998-08-16 @ Stromsgodset L 1-4 1683 1712 29.0% 20.6% 50.4% -13.8 15
1998-08-16 Lillestrom W 1-0 1719 1706 48.2% 20.8% 31.0% +6.3 26
1998-08-16 @ Tromso L 0-1 1706 1719 31.0% 20.8% 48.2% -6.3 23
1998-08-16 Stabaek W 2-0 1610 1802 22.2% 19.9% 57.9% +20.2 15
1998-08-16 @ Valerenga L 0-2 1802 1610 57.9% 19.9% 22.2% -20.2 33
1998-08-16 Sogndal W 5-1 1834 1583 72.6% 16.6% 10.8% +6.9 36
1998-08-16 @ Viking L 1-5 1583 1834 10.8% 16.6% 72.6% -6.9 13
1998-08-22 Tromso W 3-1 1750 1725 49.8% 20.7% 29.5% +9.9 19
1998-08-22 @ Brann L 1-3 1725 1750 29.5% 20.7% 49.8% -9.9 26
1998-08-22 Viking L 1-4 1669 1840 24.3% 20.2% 55.6% -11.8 15
1998-08-22 @ Haugesund W 4-1 1840 1669 55.6% 20.2% 24.3% +11.8 39
1998-08-22 Stromsgodset L 2-4 1699 1726 42.9% 20.9% 36.2% -12.0 23
1998-08-22 @ Lillestrom W 4-2 1726 1699 36.2% 20.9% 42.9% +12.0 25
1998-08-22 Molde L 0-2 1596 1908 12.9% 17.5% 69.5% -5.3 22
1998-08-22 @ Moss W 2-0 1908 1596 69.5% 17.5% 12.9% +5.3 45
1998-08-23 Valerenga W 2-1 1753 1630 61.2% 19.4% 19.4% +3.9 28
1998-08-23 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1630 1753 19.4% 19.4% 61.2% -3.9 15
1998-08-23 Kongsvinger L 2-5 1576 1657 35.1% 20.9% 44.0% -14.0 13
1998-08-23 @ Sogndal W 5-2 1657 1576 44.0% 20.9% 35.1% +14.0 21
1998-08-23 Rosenborg W 2-0 1782 2002 19.6% 19.4% 61.0% +21.1 36
1998-08-23 @ Stabaek L 0-2 2002 1782 61.0% 19.4% 19.6% -21.2 41
1998-08-29 Brann L 0-2 1738 1760 43.5% 20.9% 35.6% -15.7 25
1998-08-29 @ Stromsgodset W 2-0 1760 1738 35.6% 20.9% 43.5% +15.7 22
1998-08-30 Sogndal W 4-0 1657 1562 58.3% 19.8% 21.9% +16.7 18
1998-08-30 @ Haugesund L 0-4 1562 1657 21.9% 19.8% 58.3% -16.7 13
1998-08-30 Kongsvinger W 4-1 1913 1671 71.9% 16.8% 11.3% +5.6 48
1998-08-30 @ Molde L 1-4 1671 1913 11.3% 16.8% 71.9% -5.6 21
1998-08-30 Bodo Glimt W 3-0 1981 1756 70.6% 17.2% 12.2% +7.2 44
1998-08-30 @ Rosenborg L 0-3 1756 1981 12.2% 17.2% 70.6% -7.2 28
1998-08-30 Stabaek L 0-4 1715 1803 34.2% 20.9% 44.9% -24.6 26
1998-08-30 @ Tromso W 4-0 1803 1715 44.9% 20.9% 34.2% +24.6 39
1998-08-30 Moss W 1-0 1626 1591 51.2% 20.6% 28.2% +5.8 18
1998-08-30 @ Valerenga L 0-1 1591 1626 28.2% 20.6% 51.2% -5.8 22
1998-08-30 Lillestrom L 0-1 1852 1687 65.4% 18.6% 16.0% -12.0 39
1998-08-30 @ Viking W 1-0 1687 1852 16.0% 18.6% 65.4% +12.0 26
1998-09-08 Stromsgodset W 3-1 1585 1722 28.0% 20.5% 51.4% +15.7 25
1998-09-08 @ Moss L 1-3 1722 1585 51.4% 20.5% 28.0% -15.7 25
1998-09-09 Rosenborg L 2-8 1666 1988 12.3% 17.3% 70.4% -9.5 21
1998-09-09 @ Kongsvinger W 8-2 1988 1666 70.4% 17.3% 12.3% +9.5 47
1998-09-12 Tromso W 3-2 1749 1690 54.1% 20.3% 25.6% +4.8 31
1998-09-12 @ Bodo Glimt L 2-3 1690 1749 25.6% 20.3% 54.1% -4.8 26
1998-09-12 Valerenga L 1-3 1656 1632 49.7% 20.7% 29.6% -15.2 21
1998-09-12 @ Kongsvinger W 3-1 1632 1656 29.6% 20.7% 49.7% +15.2 21
1998-09-12 Haugesund W 5-0 1699 1674 49.9% 20.6% 29.4% +26.7 29
1998-09-12 @ Lillestrom L 0-5 1674 1699 29.4% 20.6% 49.9% -26.7 18
1998-09-12 Rosenborg L 1-3 1600 1997 8.7% 15.4% 75.9% -3.0 25
1998-09-12 @ Moss W 3-1 1997 1600 75.9% 15.4% 8.7% +3.0 50
1998-09-12 Molde L 1-4 1545 1918 9.7% 16.0% 74.3% -4.8 13
1998-09-12 @ Sogndal W 4-1 1918 1545 74.3% 16.0% 9.7% +4.8 51
1998-09-12 Stromsgodset W 4-0 1827 1706 61.1% 19.4% 19.5% +15.0 42
1998-09-12 @ Stabaek L 0-4 1706 1827 19.5% 19.4% 61.1% -15.0 25
1998-09-12 Brann L 2-3 1840 1775 54.8% 20.2% 25.0% -9.1 39
1998-09-12 @ Viking W 3-2 1775 1840 25.0% 20.2% 54.8% +9.1 25
1998-09-19 Viking W 4-3 1842 1831 48.0% 20.8% 31.2% +5.6 45
1998-09-19 @ Stabaek L 3-4 1831 1842 31.2% 20.8% 48.0% -5.6 39
1998-09-20 Brann L 2-3 1647 1785 28.0% 20.5% 51.4% -5.2 18
1998-09-20 @ Haugesund W 3-2 1785 1647 51.4% 20.5% 28.0% +5.2 28
1998-09-20 Sogndal L 0-1 1726 1540 67.3% 18.1% 14.6% -12.3 29
1998-09-20 @ Lillestrom W 1-0 1540 1726 14.6% 18.1% 67.3% +12.3 16
1998-09-20 Kongsvinger W 4-0 2000 1641 79.8% 13.7% 6.5% +4.8 53
1998-09-20 @ Rosenborg L 0-4 1641 2000 6.5% 13.7% 79.8% -4.8 21
1998-09-20 Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1691 1754 37.7% 21.0% 41.3% +0.1 26
1998-09-20 @ Stromsgodset D 2-2 1754 1691 41.3% 21.0% 37.7% -0.1 32
1998-09-20 Moss D 0-0 1686 1597 57.5% 19.9% 22.6% -1.7 27
1998-09-20 @ Tromso D 0-0 1597 1686 22.6% 19.9% 57.5% +1.7 26
1998-09-20 Molde W 3-1 1647 1923 15.2% 18.3% 66.4% +19.8 24
1998-09-20 @ Valerenga L 1-3 1923 1647 66.4% 18.3% 15.2% -19.8 51
1998-09-26 Lillestrom L 1-2 1790 1714 56.1% 20.1% 23.8% -9.8 28
1998-09-26 @ Brann W 2-1 1714 1790 23.8% 20.1% 56.1% +9.8 32
1998-09-26 Rosenborg L 0-2 1903 2005 32.4% 20.8% 46.8% -12.4 51
1998-09-26 @ Molde W 2-0 2005 1903 46.8% 20.8% 32.4% +12.4 56
1998-09-27 Viking W 3-1 1754 1826 36.4% 20.9% 42.6% +13.4 35
1998-09-27 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-3 1826 1754 42.6% 20.9% 36.4% -13.4 39
1998-09-27 Tromso W 2-1 1636 1684 39.8% 21.0% 39.2% +7.2 24
1998-09-27 @ Kongsvinger L 1-2 1684 1636 39.2% 21.0% 39.8% -7.2 27
1998-09-27 Valerenga L 1-3 1553 1667 30.8% 20.7% 48.5% -10.3 16
1998-09-27 @ Sogndal W 3-1 1667 1553 48.5% 20.7% 30.8% +10.3 27
1998-09-27 Haugesund D 1-1 1848 1642 69.1% 17.6% 13.3% -2.5 46
1998-09-27 @ Stabaek D 1-1 1642 1848 13.3% 17.6% 69.1% +2.5 19
1998-10-04 Sogndal W 4-0 1780 1542 71.6% 16.9% 11.5% +8.8 31
1998-10-04 @ Brann L 0-4 1542 1780 11.5% 16.9% 71.6% -8.8 16
1998-10-04 Bodo Glimt W 5-4 1644 1767 29.8% 20.7% 49.6% +8.0 22
1998-10-04 @ Haugesund L 4-5 1767 1644 49.6% 20.7% 29.8% -8.0 35
1998-10-04 Stabaek L 2-3 1724 1845 29.9% 20.7% 49.4% -5.5 32
1998-10-04 @ Lillestrom W 3-2 1845 1724 49.4% 20.7% 29.9% +5.5 49
1998-10-04 Valerenga W 1-0 2018 1677 78.7% 14.2% 7.1% +1.5 59
1998-10-04 @ Rosenborg L 0-1 1677 2018 7.1% 14.2% 78.7% -1.5 27
1998-10-04 Kongsvinger W 1-0 1692 1643 52.8% 20.4% 26.8% +5.6 29
1998-10-04 @ Stromsgodset L 0-1 1643 1692 26.8% 20.4% 52.8% -5.6 24
1998-10-04 Molde L 2-6 1677 1891 20.1% 19.5% 60.4% -10.9 27
1998-10-04 @ Tromso W 6-2 1891 1677 60.4% 19.5% 20.1% +10.9 54
1998-10-04 Moss W 5-2 1812 1599 69.7% 17.5% 12.9% +5.6 42
1998-10-04 @ Viking L 2-5 1599 1812 12.9% 17.5% 69.7% -5.6 26
1998-10-17 Lillestrom D 1-1 1759 1718 51.9% 20.5% 27.6% -1.0 36
1998-10-17 @ Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1718 1759 27.6% 20.5% 51.9% +1.0 33
1998-10-18 Viking D 1-1 1638 1818 23.4% 20.0% 56.6% +1.4 25
1998-10-18 @ Kongsvinger D 1-1 1818 1638 56.6% 20.0% 23.4% -1.4 43
1998-10-18 Stromsgodset L 1-3 1902 1697 69.0% 17.7% 13.4% -20.5 54
1998-10-18 @ Molde W 3-1 1697 1902 13.4% 17.7% 69.0% +20.5 32
1998-10-18 Haugesund W 2-0 1594 1652 38.2% 21.0% 40.8% +14.9 29
1998-10-18 @ Moss L 0-2 1652 1594 40.8% 21.0% 38.2% -14.9 22
1998-10-18 Sogndal W 4-0 2019 1533 86.0% 10.5% 3.5% +2.4 62
1998-10-18 @ Rosenborg L 0-4 1533 2019 3.5% 10.5% 86.0% -2.4 16
1998-10-18 Brann D 1-1 1851 1789 54.5% 20.3% 25.2% -1.2 50
1998-10-18 @ Stabaek D 1-1 1789 1851 25.2% 20.3% 54.5% +1.2 32
1998-10-18 Tromso W 1-0 1676 1666 47.9% 20.8% 31.4% +6.4 30
1998-10-18 @ Valerenga L 0-1 1666 1676 31.4% 20.8% 47.9% -6.4 27
1998-10-25 Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1790 1758 50.7% 20.6% 28.7% +5.6 35
1998-10-25 @ Brann L 1-2 1758 1790 28.7% 20.6% 50.7% -5.6 36
1998-10-25 Kongsvinger D 1-1 1638 1639 46.3% 20.8% 32.9% -0.5 23
1998-10-25 @ Haugesund D 1-1 1639 1638 32.9% 20.8% 46.3% +0.6 26
1998-10-25 Moss L 3-4 1719 1608 60.0% 19.6% 20.4% -9.6 33
1998-10-25 @ Lillestrom W 4-3 1608 1719 20.4% 19.6% 60.0% +9.6 32
1998-10-25 Tromso D 1-1 2022 1659 79.9% 13.7% 6.4% -3.3 63
1998-10-25 @ Rosenborg D 1-1 1659 2022 6.4% 13.7% 79.9% +3.3 28
1998-10-25 Stabaek L 0-9 1531 1850 12.5% 17.3% 70.1% -20.9 16
1998-10-25 @ Sogndal W 9-0 1850 1531 70.1% 17.3% 12.5% +20.9 53
1998-10-25 Valerenga L 0-5 1718 1682 51.2% 20.6% 28.3% -42.2 32
1998-10-25 @ Stromsgodset W 5-0 1682 1718 28.3% 20.6% 51.2% +42.2 33
1998-10-25 Molde W 3-1 1816 1882 37.4% 21.0% 41.7% +13.1 46
1998-10-25 @ Viking L 1-3 1882 1816 41.7% 21.0% 37.4% -13.1 54

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1998-07-09 8.98% @ Sogndal 1590 2 Rosenborg 1980 1
2 1998-04-13 12.08% Moss 1576 1 @ Brann 1803 0
3 1998-10-18 13.36% Stromsgodset 1697 3 @ Molde 1902 1
4 1998-09-20 14.58% Sogndal 1540 1 @ Lillestrom 1726 0
5 1998-09-20 15.24% @ Valerenga 1647 3 Molde 1923 1
6 1998-08-30 16.03% Lillestrom 1687 1 @ Viking 1852 0
7 1998-08-23 19.58% @ Stabaek 1782 2 Rosenborg 2002 0
8 1998-07-01 19.96% Molde 1870 2 @ Rosenborg 1986 1
9 1998-10-25 20.44% Moss 1608 4 @ Lillestrom 1719 3
10 1998-08-16 22.14% Moss 1580 4 @ Kongsvinger 1673 2
11 1998-08-16 22.21% @ Valerenga 1610 2 Stabaek 1802 0
12 1998-04-26 23.54% Tromso 1700 2 @ Viking 1778 1
13 1998-07-19 23.74% @ Moss 1574 3 Brann 1751 0
14 1998-09-26 23.79% Lillestrom 1714 2 @ Brann 1790 1
15 1998-06-07 24.03% Stabaek 1756 3 @ Viking 1830 1
16 1998-07-05 24.89% @ Sogndal 1580 2 Brann 1746 1
17 1998-09-12 24.96% Brann 1775 3 @ Viking 1840 2
18 1998-04-19 25.60% @ Moss 1589 1 Stabaek 1748 0
19 1998-05-07 25.87% Lillestrom 1683 3 @ Stromsgodset 1739 2
20 1998-05-03 27.00% @ Moss 1595 2 Kongsvinger 1742 0
21 1998-05-10 27.24% Stromsgodset 1730 1 @ Brann 1775 0
22 1998-09-08 28.03% @ Moss 1585 3 Stromsgodset 1722 1
23 1998-10-25 28.27% Valerenga 1682 5 @ Stromsgodset 1718 0
24 1998-04-30 29.55% @ Valerenga 1665 3 Brann 1790 2
25 1998-09-12 29.64% Valerenga 1632 3 @ Kongsvinger 1656 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1998-10-25 42.18 Valerenga 5 1682 28.27% @ Stromsgodset 0 1718 51.16% 20.57%
2 1998-05-10 30.60 Haugesund 4 1651 34.21% @ Sogndal 0 1640 44.90% 20.89%
3 1998-07-19 28.48 @ Moss 3 1574 23.74% Brann 0 1751 56.17% 20.09%
4 1998-09-12 26.72 @ Lillestrom 5 1699 49.89% Haugesund 0 1674 29.45% 20.65%
5 1998-04-30 26.12 Viking 5 1768 32.97% @ Stromsgodset 1 1766 46.19% 20.85%
6 1998-08-30 24.60 Stabaek 4 1803 44.85% @ Tromso 0 1715 34.25% 20.89%
7 1998-04-13 23.67 Kongsvinger 3 1725 33.65% @ Lillestrom 0 1717 45.48% 20.87%
8 1998-08-02 23.19 Lillestrom 5 1692 39.07% @ Valerenga 1 1645 39.95% 20.97%
9 1998-08-23 21.15 @ Stabaek 2 1782 19.58% Rosenborg 0 2002 61.01% 19.41%
10 1998-10-25 20.87 Stabaek 9 1850 70.11% @ Sogndal 0 1531 12.53% 17.35%
11 1998-10-18 20.46 Stromsgodset 3 1697 13.36% @ Molde 1 1902 68.96% 17.68%
12 1998-07-01 20.40 @ Valerenga 4 1644 52.08% Sogndal 0 1601 27.42% 20.49%
13 1998-08-16 20.16 @ Valerenga 2 1610 22.21% Stabaek 0 1802 57.92% 19.87%
14 1998-09-20 19.79 @ Valerenga 3 1647 15.24% Molde 1 1923 66.44% 18.32%
15 1998-08-02 19.77 Stabaek 5 1799 46.37% @ Kongsvinger 1 1700 32.79% 20.84%
16 1998-07-19 19.13 @ Kongsvinger 3 1692 44.15% Lillestrom 0 1709 34.94% 20.91%
17 1998-07-01 19.00 @ Tromso 3 1702 44.46% Kongsvinger 0 1717 34.64% 20.91%
18 1998-05-03 18.47 @ Moss 2 1595 27.00% Kongsvinger 0 1742 52.54% 20.46%
19 1998-05-16 17.97 Viking 4 1812 39.04% @ Brann 1 1765 39.98% 20.97%
20 1998-07-26 17.83 @ Brann 3 1722 47.14% Kongsvinger 0 1718 32.05% 20.81%
21 1998-05-10 17.53 Molde 3 1837 47.80% @ Kongsvinger 0 1728 31.43% 20.77%
22 1998-06-07 16.89 Stabaek 3 1756 24.03% @ Viking 1 1830 55.84% 20.13%
23 1998-08-08 16.87 Molde 4 1887 42.14% @ Stabaek 1 1819 36.91% 20.96%
24 1998-07-30 16.71 @ Bodo Glimt 6 1736 46.54% Stromsgodset 2 1736 32.63% 20.83%
25 1998-08-30 16.67 @ Haugesund 4 1657 58.33% Sogndal 0 1562 21.86% 19.82%