Home / Leagues / Norway / Tippeligaen / 1997
‹ ›

1997 Tippeligaen Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

61 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Stromsgodset

10.16 points above expected

46 points · 35.84 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Tromso

14.16 points below expected

28 points · 42.16 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Rosenborg 26 18 7 1 61 87 20 +67 56.50 +4.50
2 Brann 26 15 5 6 50 59 37 +22 44.71 +5.29
3 Stromsgodset 26 14 4 8 46 58 44 +14 35.84 +10.16
4 Molde 26 13 6 7 45 47 36 +11 40.32 +4.68
5 Stabaek 26 13 4 9 43 33 35 -2 39.28 +3.72
6 Kongsvinger 26 11 5 10 38 43 48 -5 34.46 +3.54
7 Bodo Glimt 26 10 7 9 37 39 34 +5 41.04 -4.04
8 Viking 26 8 10 8 34 42 34 +8 43.86 -9.86
9 Haugesund 26 9 5 12 32 31 38 -7 23.81 +8.19
10 Lillestrom 26 9 5 12 32 34 43 -9 40.14 -8.14
11 Sogndal 26 8 5 13 29 34 56 -22 22.78 +6.22
12 Tromso 26 6 10 10 28 37 44 -7 42.16 -14.16
13 Lyn Oslo 26 4 5 17 17 28 58 -30 17.51 -0.51
14 Skeid 26 3 4 19 13 27 72 -45 23.51 -10.51

Form

Each team's 5-game rolling points-per-game across the season. Hot streaks push above the dashed 1.5 PPG reference line; cold spells drop below. Each team gets a distinct color; the legend below the plot lets you read off which line is which. (First 4 games of each team have no rolling window, so the lines start at game 5.)

League Race

Cumulative points across the season for each team. Highlighted teams are drawn in color (top finishers for the Title Race, bottom finishers for the Relegation Race); the rest of the league appears in light gray as context. Switch views with the buttons below.

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Rosenborg 2033 61 56.50 +4.50 79.7% 32 47 53 57 61 66 75
Brann 1825 50 44.71 +5.29 81.2% 19 34 40 45 49 55 66
Molde 1798 45 40.32 +4.68 79.2% 16 30 36 40 45 51 66
Stromsgodset 1782 46 35.84 +10.16 95.4% 14 25 32 36 40 46 58
Viking 1770 34 43.86 -9.86 7.1% 23 33 40 44 48 54 67
Bodo Glimt 1743 37 41.04 -4.04 29.4% 16 30 37 41 45 52 64
Stabaek 1725 43 39.28 +3.72 74.2% 18 29 35 39 44 50 63
Kongsvinger 1698 38 34.46 +3.54 74.0% 12 24 30 34 39 45 58
Lillestrom 1685 32 40.14 -8.14 11.5% 18 30 36 40 44 51 64
Tromso 1649 28 42.16 -14.16 1.7% 18 31 38 42 46 53 64
Haugesund 1627 32 23.81 +8.19 92.5% 5 14 20 24 28 34 51
Sogndal 1597 29 22.78 +6.22 87.7% 4 14 19 23 27 32 47
Lyn Oslo 1510 17 17.51 -0.51 51.5% 2 9 14 17 21 26 39
Skeid 1439 13 23.51 -10.51 3.7% 4 14 19 23 27 33 45

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team BG BRA HAU KON LIL LO MOL ROS SKE SOG STA STR TRO VIK
Bodo Glimt —
0-0-2
2.71
0-2-0
4.12
1-1-0
3.05
0-0-2
2.66
2-0-0
4.49
1-0-1
3.03
0-1-1
1.38
2-0-0
4.32
2-0-0
4.22
0-2-0
2.91
1-1-0
2.95
1-0-1
2.48
0-0-2
2.73
Brann
2-0-0
2.82
 —
2-0-0
4.14
2-0-0
3.50
0-1-1
3.30
1-1-0
4.66
1-0-1
3.32
0-1-1
1.61
1-1-0
4.47
1-0-1
4.32
2-0-0
3.13
2-0-0
3.51
1-0-1
2.97
0-1-1
2.98
Haugesund
0-2-0
1.45
0-0-2
1.43
 —
0-1-1
1.73
2-0-0
1.93
1-0-1
3.41
1-0-1
1.56
0-0-2
0.80
2-0-0
2.99
1-0-1
2.67
0-0-2
1.55
0-1-1
1.64
0-1-1
1.42
2-0-0
1.26
Kongsvinger
0-1-1
2.47
0-0-2
2.03
1-1-0
3.82
 —
2-0-0
2.18
1-1-0
4.18
1-0-1
2.22
0-1-1
1.45
2-0-0
3.52
1-0-1
3.70
0-1-1
2.14
1-0-1
2.76
1-0-1
2.18
1-0-1
1.89
Lillestrom
2-0-0
2.86
1-1-0
2.23
0-0-2
3.62
0-0-2
3.36
 —
2-0-0
4.30
0-2-0
2.49
1-0-1
1.69
0-1-1
4.11
0-0-2
4.15
0-0-2
3.14
0-0-2
3.36
1-1-0
2.59
2-0-0
2.25
Lyn Oslo
0-0-2
1.11
0-1-1
0.97
1-0-1
2.12
0-1-1
1.40
0-0-2
1.29
 —
0-0-2
1.11
0-0-2
0.70
1-0-1
2.29
1-0-1
1.98
0-1-1
1.16
0-0-2
1.35
1-0-1
1.17
0-2-0
0.93
Molde
1-0-1
2.49
1-0-1
2.21
1-0-1
4.00
1-0-1
3.33
0-2-0
3.05
2-0-0
4.51
 —
0-0-2
1.38
1-1-0
3.93
1-1-0
4.31
2-0-0
2.83
1-0-1
3.10
1-1-0
2.77
1-1-0
2.32
Rosenborg
1-1-0
4.19
1-1-0
3.95
2-0-0
4.86
1-1-0
4.13
1-0-1
3.88
2-0-0
5.00
2-0-0
4.20
 —
2-0-0
5.13
2-0-0
4.88
2-0-0
4.05
2-0-0
4.23
0-2-0
3.93
0-2-0
4.01
Skeid
0-0-2
1.28
0-1-1
1.13
0-0-2
2.54
0-0-2
2.02
1-1-0
1.46
1-0-1
3.25
0-1-1
1.64
0-0-2
0.59
 —
1-0-1
2.89
0-0-2
1.57
0-0-2
2.21
0-1-1
1.54
0-0-2
1.35
Sogndal
0-0-2
1.36
1-0-1
1.27
1-0-1
2.85
1-0-1
1.85
2-0-0
1.43
1-0-1
3.56
0-1-1
1.28
0-0-2
0.78
1-0-1
2.63
 —
0-0-2
1.52
0-1-1
1.51
1-1-0
1.47
0-2-0
1.32
Stabaek
0-2-0
2.62
0-0-2
2.39
2-0-0
4.01
1-1-0
3.39
2-0-0
2.39
1-1-0
4.44
0-0-2
2.70
0-0-2
1.52
2-0-0
4.02
2-0-0
4.04
 —
0-0-2
2.86
2-0-0
2.38
1-0-1
2.60
Stromsgodset
0-1-1
2.59
0-0-2
2.03
1-1-0
3.91
1-0-1
2.76
2-0-0
2.18
2-0-0
4.24
1-0-1
2.43
0-0-2
1.35
2-0-0
3.32
1-1-0
4.05
2-0-0
2.67
 —
1-1-0
2.20
1-0-1
2.20
Tromso
1-0-1
3.05
1-0-1
2.56
1-1-0
4.15
1-0-1
3.35
0-1-1
2.94
1-0-1
4.43
0-1-1
2.76
0-2-0
1.62
1-1-0
4.02
0-1-1
4.09
0-0-2
3.15
0-1-1
3.33
 —
0-2-0
2.58
Viking
2-0-0
2.79
1-1-0
2.56
0-0-2
4.33
1-0-1
3.66
0-0-2
3.28
0-2-0
4.70
0-1-1
3.21
0-2-0
1.57
2-0-0
4.24
0-2-0
4.26
1-0-1
2.92
1-0-1
3.33
0-2-0
2.95
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.74 +6.8
Allowed 0.71 -8.4
Differential 0.88 +4.5

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%6.87%4.40%3.85%2.75%1.92%23.63%
16.87%10.99%6.87%4.40%1.65%3.02%33.79%
24.40%6.87%4.40%0.82%1.10%0.55%18.13%
33.85%4.40%0.82%2.20%0.27%—11.54%
42.75%1.65%1.10%0.27%1.10%0.27%7.14%
5+1.92%3.02%0.55%—0.27%—5.77%
Total23.63%33.79%18.13%11.54%7.14%5.77%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.65 1.65 +0.00
SD 1.51 1.51 2.35
CV 0.92 0.92 —
Max 8 8 +8
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%—7.69%——19.23%
111.54%19.23%7.69%7.69%——46.15%
2—11.54%3.85%—3.85%—19.23%
3———————
47.69%3.85%————11.54%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total23.08%46.15%11.54%15.38%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 1.31 +0.19
SD 1.36 1.12 1.96
CV 0.91 0.86 —
Max 5 4 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%3.85%—3.85%3.85%—19.23%
17.69%7.69%7.69%—3.85%—26.92%
23.85%—3.85%———7.69%
33.85%7.69%3.85%———15.38%
43.85%7.69%3.85%3.85%——19.23%
5+—7.69%——3.85%—11.54%
Total26.92%34.62%19.23%7.69%11.54%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.27 1.42 +0.85
SD 1.82 1.30 2.17
CV 0.80 0.91 —
Max 6 4 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—19.23%—3.85%—3.85%26.92%
111.54%15.38%11.54%———38.46%
23.85%11.54%—3.85%—3.85%23.08%
37.69%——3.85%——11.54%
4———————
5+———————
Total23.08%46.15%11.54%11.54%—7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.19 1.46 -0.27
SD 0.98 1.50 1.85
CV 0.82 1.03 —
Max 3 6 +3
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%3.85%——3.85%3.85%19.23%
13.85%3.85%11.54%11.54%——30.77%
27.69%11.54%3.85%———23.08%
33.85%11.54%—3.85%——19.23%
4——3.85%——3.85%7.69%
5+———————
Total23.08%30.77%19.23%15.38%3.85%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.65 1.85 -0.19
SD 1.23 1.91 2.33
CV 0.74 1.04 —
Max 4 8 +3
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.69%11.54%3.85%——23.08%
17.69%11.54%3.85%7.69%3.85%3.85%38.46%
27.69%7.69%7.69%—3.85%—26.92%
3—7.69%————7.69%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+———————
Total19.23%34.62%23.08%11.54%7.69%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.31 1.65 -0.35
SD 1.05 1.35 1.94
CV 0.80 0.82 —
Max 4 5 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%11.54%7.69%7.69%3.85%3.85%42.31%
1—7.69%11.54%7.69%—11.54%38.46%
23.85%—————3.85%
33.85%—————3.85%
43.85%———3.85%—7.69%
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total19.23%19.23%23.08%15.38%7.69%15.38%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.08 2.23 -1.15
SD 1.41 1.77 2.38
CV 1.31 0.79 —
Max 5 6 +4
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%7.69%—7.69%—23.08%
17.69%7.69%7.69%———23.08%
27.69%7.69%————15.38%
37.69%7.69%3.85%7.69%——26.92%
43.85%3.85%——3.85%—11.54%
5+———————
Total30.77%30.77%19.23%7.69%11.54%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.81 1.38 +0.42
SD 1.39 1.33 2.02
CV 0.77 0.96 —
Max 4 4 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%—————3.85%
13.85%11.54%3.85%———19.23%
2—7.69%11.54%———19.23%
37.69%3.85%————11.54%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+23.08%15.38%3.85%———42.31%
Total42.31%38.46%19.23%———100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.35 0.77 +2.58
SD 1.98 0.76 2.30
CV 0.59 0.99 —
Max 7 2 +7
Min 0 0 -1

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%7.69%15.38%11.54%3.85%42.31%
1—3.85%7.69%7.69%3.85%7.69%30.77%
2—3.85%7.69%—3.85%—15.38%
33.85%——3.85%——7.69%
4———————
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total3.85%15.38%23.08%26.92%19.23%11.54%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.04 2.77 -1.73
SD 1.25 1.37 2.20
CV 1.20 0.49 —
Max 5 5 +4
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.69%3.85%7.69%—7.69%26.92%
17.69%3.85%11.54%3.85%3.85%—30.77%
23.85%11.54%7.69%——3.85%26.92%
3—7.69%—7.69%——15.38%
4———————
5+———————
Total11.54%30.77%23.08%19.23%3.85%11.54%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.31 2.15 -0.85
SD 1.05 1.69 2.20
CV 0.80 0.78 —
Max 3 7 +2
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%11.54%3.85%3.85%—3.85%26.92%
115.38%11.54%——3.85%7.69%38.46%
27.69%11.54%————19.23%
37.69%3.85%————11.54%
4—3.85%————3.85%
5+———————
Total34.62%42.31%3.85%3.85%3.85%11.54%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.27 1.35 -0.08
SD 1.12 1.65 2.26
CV 0.88 1.22 —
Max 4 5 +3
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——7.69%—3.85%—11.54%
111.54%11.54%3.85%—3.85%7.69%38.46%
27.69%———3.85%—11.54%
3—11.54%3.85%3.85%——19.23%
43.85%—3.85%———7.69%
5+3.85%7.69%————11.54%
Total26.92%30.77%19.23%3.85%11.54%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.23 1.69 +0.54
SD 1.95 1.69 2.97
CV 0.87 1.00 —
Max 8 6 +8
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%3.85%—3.85%—19.23%
13.85%23.08%3.85%7.69%—3.85%42.31%
23.85%7.69%7.69%3.85%——23.08%
33.85%———3.85%—7.69%
43.85%———3.85%—7.69%
5+———————
Total19.23%38.46%15.38%11.54%11.54%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.42 1.69 -0.27
SD 1.14 1.44 1.78
CV 0.80 0.85 —
Max 4 5 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.54%7.69%7.69%———26.92%
13.85%15.38%3.85%7.69%——30.77%
23.85%3.85%7.69%3.85%——19.23%
33.85%—————3.85%
43.85%3.85%3.85%—3.85%—15.38%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total26.92%34.62%23.08%11.54%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.62 1.31 +0.31
SD 1.53 1.12 1.76
CV 0.94 0.86 —
Max 5 4 +4
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 26

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Stromsgodset 46 35.84 +10.16
2 Haugesund 32 23.81 +8.19
3 Sogndal 29 22.78 +6.22
4 Brann 50 44.71 +5.29
5 Molde 45 40.32 +4.68

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Tromso 28 42.16 -14.16
2 Skeid 13 23.51 -10.51
3 Viking 34 43.86 -9.86
4 Lillestrom 32 40.14 -8.14
5 Bodo Glimt 37 41.04 -4.04

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts W or D consecutively; Winless counts L or D consecutively.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Sogndal 3 Oct 5 – Oct 19 1 in 92
2 Stabaek 6 Jul 23 – Aug 23 1 in 63
3 Kongsvinger 3 Sep 21 – Oct 12 1 in 43
4 Brann 6 Aug 31 – Oct 19 1 in 32
5 Stromsgodset 4 May 16 – May 29 1 in 18

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Lillestrom 3 Jun 1 – Jun 22 1 in 183
2 Skeid 8 Aug 10 – Oct 19 1 in 110
3 Tromso 3 Oct 5 – Oct 19 1 in 101
4 Sogndal 7 Apr 25 – May 25 1 in 72
5 Brann 3 May 11 – May 19 1 in 48

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Sogndal 4 Jun 1 – Jun 29 1 in 57
2 Rosenborg 24 Apr 25 – Oct 19 1 in 37
3 Molde 7 Jun 29 – Aug 24 1 in 24
4 Skeid 3 Jul 13 – Aug 3 1 in 23
5 Lyn Oslo 3 Apr 25 – May 8 1 in 23

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Viking 8 Jul 13 – Sep 21 1 in 304
2 Tromso 7 Aug 24 – Oct 19 1 in 71
3 Skeid 17 May 29 – Oct 19 1 in 62
4 Molde 4 Aug 9 – Sep 13 1 in 27
5 Rosenborg 4 Apr 13 – May 3 1 in 21

Finish Position Heatmap

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team1234567891011121314
Rosenborg78.85%13.06%4.35%2.01%0.94%0.41%0.24%0.09%0.04%0.01%————
Brann6.09%22.76%18.20%13.66%11.71%8.91%7.10%5.40%3.51%1.92%0.52%0.18%0.02%0.02%
Stromsgodset0.30%2.45%4.64%5.82%8.03%9.68%12.08%13.96%16.34%15.45%6.91%3.10%1.03%0.21%
Molde1.74%8.40%10.30%12.15%12.72%12.72%12.21%11.29%9.17%6.27%2.26%0.54%0.21%0.02%
Stabaek1.24%5.94%8.33%10.26%11.33%11.94%12.99%12.67%11.63%8.79%3.37%1.21%0.25%0.05%
Kongsvinger0.22%1.55%2.52%3.99%5.43%7.92%10.18%13.85%16.79%20.63%10.25%4.42%1.65%0.60%
Bodo Glimt2.20%9.49%12.16%12.54%12.75%12.17%11.31%10.56%8.42%5.76%1.84%0.60%0.17%0.03%
Viking4.87%17.94%17.00%14.28%12.57%10.22%8.32%6.37%4.71%2.67%0.79%0.24%0.02%—
Haugesund—0.01%0.07%0.06%0.16%0.45%0.83%1.98%4.21%9.38%24.76%24.84%21.17%12.08%
Lillestrom1.43%6.99%9.02%11.32%12.08%12.81%12.63%11.69%10.74%7.65%2.62%0.81%0.19%0.02%
Sogndal—0.02%0.01%0.04%0.07%0.25%0.54%1.09%2.99%7.12%19.44%26.36%26.15%15.92%
Tromso3.06%11.39%13.39%13.79%12.08%12.16%10.76%9.17%7.74%4.38%1.41%0.51%0.16%—
Lyn Oslo—————0.01%0.05%0.20%0.35%1.66%5.60%12.82%23.94%55.37%
Skeid——0.01%0.08%0.13%0.35%0.76%1.68%3.36%8.31%20.23%24.37%25.04%15.68%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Points Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 5% * Slight Edge: 5% to 15% * Clear Edge: 15% to 25% * Strong Edge: 25% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+14.84%
Slight Edge
46.15%22.53%31.32%
Elo Value
Home Edge
164 Elo
0.006 goals per Elo point
051.93500
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.37 goals
Neutral
-2+0.32+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.15 * Tight Race: 0.15 to 0.4 * Comfortable: 0.4 to 0.75 * Runaway: 0.75 and up.
Title-Race Openness
1.6
One-Team Race
124610
Champion Preseason Odds
79%
Rosenborg, 1st of 14
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.42/gm
Comfortable
00.280.6/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 4.92 * Some Luck: 4.92 to 7.39 * Lucky: 7.39 to 9.85 * Wild Swing: 9.85 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.43 * Close: 1.43 to 2.15 * Off: 2.15 to 2.86 * Way Off: 2.86 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
7.54 points
Lucky
06.1615
Average Finish Error
Expected
2.86
Off
01.794
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 96.43%
95.40%
Stromsgodset
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 3.57%
1.72%
Tromso
050
Season Outliers
Expected
3 of 14
Minimal Outliers
01.47

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.12 * Even: 0.12 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.26 * Lopsided: 0.26 and up.
Noll-Scully
How much more spread out the table was than a league where every match is a coin flip. The gold line at 1 is that coin-flip baseline. Above it, real talent gaps stretched the table; below it, the league was tighter than luck alone would produce.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1 * Moderate Separation: 1 to 1.6 * Strong Separation: 1.6 to 2.2 * Wide Separation: 2.2 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 60% * Slight Edge: 60% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 80% * Wide Edge: 80% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 82% * Strong Edge: 82% to 92% * Dominant: 92% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 30% * Some Drama: 30% to 40% * Frequent: 40% to 50% * Very Frequent: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 8% * Occasional: 8% to 14% * Frequent: 14% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.19
Top-Heavy
00.120.180.260.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.66
Strong Separation
01.003
Interquartile Edge
70%
Slight Edge
50%60%70%80%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 95%
97%
Dominant
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
52%
Very Frequent
0%48%100%
Blowouts
Expected
27%
Very Frequent
0%29%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.1 * Slight Separation: 0.1 to 0.18 * Notable Separation: 0.18 to 0.28 * Lopsided: 0.28 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.3 * Some Carryover: 0.3 to 0.6 * Strong Carryover: 0.6 to 0.85 * Near-Lock: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 25% * As Expected: 25% to 33% * Upset-Prone: 33% to 42% * Very Upset-Prone: 42% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 15% * As Expected: 15% to 25% * Shaky Favorites: 25% to 35% * Very Shaky: 35% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.59
Predictable
00.572
Matchup Imbalance
0.42
Lopsided
00.10.180.280.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.47
Chaotic
01.002
Repeatability
0.44
Some Carryover
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
23%
Chalky
0%22%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
19%
As Expected
0%19%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.18 * Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.24 * Well Above Noise: 0.24 and up.
Probability calibration
0.36
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.93
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.086
Well Within Noise
00.1220.3

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Qualified for relegation playoff Direct relegation
Rosenborg 100% — —
Viking 99.74% 0.24% 0.02%
Brann 99.78% 0.18% 0.04%
Tromso 99.33% 0.51% 0.16%
Bodo Glimt 99.20% 0.60% 0.20%
Lillestrom 98.98% 0.81% 0.21%
Molde 99.23% 0.54% 0.23%
Stabaek 98.49% 1.21% 0.30%
Stromsgodset 95.66% 3.10% 1.24%
Kongsvinger 93.33% 4.42% 2.25%
Haugesund 41.91% 24.84% 33.25%
Skeid 34.91% 24.37% 40.72%
Sogndal 31.57% 26.36% 42.07%
Lyn Oslo 7.87% 12.82% 79.31%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss % Elo Δ Points
1997-04-12 Lillestrom W 4-1 1728 1807 34.2% 23.8% 41.9% +24.8 3
1997-04-12 @ Stabaek L 1-4 1807 1728 41.9% 23.8% 34.2% -24.8 0
1997-04-13 Tromso D 1-1 1559 1772 19.2% 22.3% 58.5% +2.2 1
1997-04-13 @ Haugesund D 1-1 1772 1559 58.5% 22.3% 19.2% -2.2 1
1997-04-13 Kongsvinger L 1-2 1503 1709 19.9% 22.4% 57.7% -5.5 0
1997-04-13 @ Lyn Oslo W 2-1 1709 1503 57.7% 22.4% 19.9% +5.5 3
1997-04-13 Brann D 1-1 1883 1766 59.3% 22.1% 18.6% -2.3 1
1997-04-13 @ Rosenborg D 1-1 1766 1883 18.6% 22.1% 59.3% +2.3 1
1997-04-13 Skeid W 4-0 1658 1619 50.4% 23.4% 26.2% +26.5 3
1997-04-13 @ Stromsgodset L 0-4 1619 1658 26.2% 23.4% 50.4% -26.5 0
1997-04-13 Sogndal D 2-2 1781 1601 65.3% 20.7% 14.0% -2.2 1
1997-04-13 @ Viking D 2-2 1601 1781 14.0% 20.7% 65.3% +2.2 1
1997-04-19 Rosenborg W 2-1 1783 1881 31.7% 23.8% 44.6% +10.6 3
1997-04-19 @ Lillestrom L 1-2 1881 1783 44.6% 23.8% 31.7% -10.6 1
1997-04-20 Bodo Glimt W 3-1 1768 1759 46.6% 23.6% 29.8% +13.4 4
1997-04-20 @ Brann L 1-3 1759 1768 29.8% 23.6% 46.6% -13.4 0
1997-04-20 Haugesund W 2-1 1715 1561 62.9% 21.3% 15.8% +4.4 6
1997-04-20 @ Kongsvinger L 1-2 1561 1715 15.8% 21.3% 62.9% -4.4 1
1997-04-20 Viking L 1-2 1592 1779 21.7% 22.8% 55.5% -5.9 0
1997-04-20 @ Skeid W 2-1 1779 1592 55.5% 22.8% 21.7% +5.9 4
1997-04-20 Lyn Oslo W 2-1 1604 1497 58.1% 22.3% 19.5% +5.4 4
1997-04-20 @ Sogndal L 1-2 1497 1604 19.5% 22.3% 58.1% -5.4 0
1997-04-20 Molde W 2-0 1685 1736 38.2% 23.9% 38.0% +18.7 6
1997-04-20 @ Stromsgodset L 0-2 1736 1685 38.0% 23.9% 38.2% -18.7 0
1997-04-25 Lillestrom L 0-1 1745 1793 38.6% 23.9% 37.5% -10.1 0
1997-04-25 @ Bodo Glimt W 1-0 1793 1745 37.5% 23.9% 38.6% +10.1 6
1997-04-25 Sogndal W 3-0 1556 1609 37.9% 23.9% 38.2% +27.3 4
1997-04-25 @ Haugesund L 0-3 1609 1556 38.2% 23.9% 37.9% -27.3 4
1997-04-25 Tromso D 0-0 1870 1770 57.5% 22.4% 20.1% -2.4 2
1997-04-25 @ Rosenborg D 0-0 1770 1870 20.1% 22.4% 57.5% +2.4 2
1997-04-25 Molde L 0-3 1587 1717 27.7% 23.5% 48.8% -21.2 0
1997-04-25 @ Skeid W 3-0 1717 1587 48.8% 23.5% 27.7% +21.2 3
1997-04-25 Kongsvinger D 0-0 1753 1719 49.7% 23.4% 26.9% -1.4 4
1997-04-25 @ Stabaek D 0-0 1719 1753 26.9% 23.4% 49.7% +1.4 7
1997-04-25 Lyn Oslo D 0-0 1785 1492 74.1% 17.5% 8.3% -4.3 5
1997-04-25 @ Viking D 0-0 1492 1785 8.3% 17.5% 74.1% +4.3 1
1997-04-26 Brann L 0-4 1703 1781 34.4% 23.8% 41.8% -32.9 6
1997-04-26 @ Stromsgodset W 4-0 1781 1703 41.8% 23.8% 34.4% +32.9 7
1997-05-03 Rosenborg D 2-2 1720 1868 25.8% 23.3% 50.9% +1.0 8
1997-05-03 @ Kongsvinger D 2-2 1868 1720 50.9% 23.3% 25.8% -1.0 3
1997-05-04 Skeid W 4-2 1814 1565 70.9% 18.8% 10.2% +4.4 10
1997-05-04 @ Brann L 2-4 1565 1814 10.2% 18.8% 70.9% -4.4 0
1997-05-04 Stromsgodset L 0-1 1803 1670 60.9% 21.8% 17.3% -14.8 6
1997-05-04 @ Lillestrom W 1-0 1670 1803 17.3% 21.8% 60.9% +14.8 9
1997-05-04 Haugesund W 3-0 1496 1584 33.1% 23.8% 43.0% +30.0 4
1997-05-04 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-3 1584 1496 43.0% 23.8% 33.1% -30.0 4
1997-05-04 Viking D 0-0 1738 1781 39.4% 23.9% 36.7% -0.2 4
1997-05-04 @ Molde D 0-0 1781 1738 36.7% 23.9% 39.4% +0.2 6
1997-05-04 Stabaek L 0-3 1582 1752 23.4% 23.0% 53.6% -18.3 4
1997-05-04 @ Sogndal W 3-0 1752 1582 53.6% 23.0% 23.4% +18.3 7
1997-05-04 Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1773 1735 50.1% 23.4% 26.5% +7.0 5
1997-05-04 @ Tromso L 1-2 1735 1773 26.5% 23.4% 50.1% -7.0 0
1997-05-08 Kongsvinger W 4-0 1728 1722 46.2% 23.7% 30.1% +29.7 3
1997-05-08 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-4 1722 1728 30.1% 23.7% 46.2% -29.7 8
1997-05-08 Brann L 0-2 1738 1819 34.1% 23.8% 42.1% -17.2 4
1997-05-08 @ Molde W 2-0 1819 1738 42.1% 23.8% 34.1% +17.2 13
1997-05-08 Sogndal W 5-0 1867 1563 74.8% 17.2% 7.9% +10.0 6
1997-05-08 @ Rosenborg L 0-5 1563 1867 7.9% 17.2% 74.8% -10.0 4
1997-05-08 Lillestrom W 5-1 1561 1789 18.1% 22.0% 59.9% +43.5 3
1997-05-08 @ Skeid L 1-5 1789 1561 59.9% 22.0% 18.1% -43.5 6
1997-05-08 Lyn Oslo D 1-1 1770 1526 70.5% 19.0% 10.5% -3.5 8
1997-05-08 @ Stabaek D 1-1 1526 1770 10.5% 19.0% 70.5% +3.6 5
1997-05-08 Tromso W 3-2 1685 1780 32.2% 23.8% 44.0% +10.0 12
1997-05-08 @ Stromsgodset L 2-3 1780 1685 44.0% 23.8% 32.2% -10.0 5
1997-05-08 Haugesund L 0-2 1781 1554 69.2% 19.5% 11.3% -31.3 6
1997-05-08 @ Viking W 2-0 1554 1781 11.3% 19.5% 69.2% +31.3 7
1997-05-11 Viking L 1-4 1836 1750 56.0% 22.7% 21.4% -31.7 13
1997-05-11 @ Brann W 4-1 1750 1836 21.4% 22.7% 56.0% +31.7 9
1997-05-11 Stabaek L 0-1 1585 1766 22.2% 22.8% 54.9% -6.4 7
1997-05-11 @ Haugesund W 1-0 1766 1585 54.9% 22.8% 22.2% +6.4 11
1997-05-11 Stromsgodset W 4-2 1692 1695 44.8% 23.7% 31.4% +12.5 11
1997-05-11 @ Kongsvinger L 2-4 1695 1692 31.4% 23.7% 44.8% -12.5 12
1997-05-11 Molde D 1-1 1745 1721 48.5% 23.5% 28.0% -1.1 7
1997-05-11 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1721 1745 28.0% 23.5% 48.5% +1.1 5
1997-05-11 Rosenborg L 0-5 1530 1877 10.5% 19.0% 70.5% -13.6 5
1997-05-11 @ Lyn Oslo W 5-0 1877 1530 70.5% 19.0% 10.5% +13.6 9
1997-05-11 Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1553 1758 20.1% 22.4% 57.5% -5.5 4
1997-05-11 @ Sogndal W 2-1 1758 1553 57.5% 22.4% 20.1% +5.5 6
1997-05-11 Skeid D 2-2 1770 1604 63.9% 21.1% 15.0% -2.1 6
1997-05-11 @ Tromso D 2-2 1604 1770 15.0% 21.1% 63.9% +2.1 4
1997-05-16 Lyn Oslo W 1-0 1763 1516 70.8% 18.9% 10.3% +3.0 9
1997-05-16 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-1 1516 1763 10.3% 18.9% 70.8% -3.0 5
1997-05-16 Lillestrom L 1-2 1804 1744 52.9% 23.1% 24.0% -12.3 13
1997-05-16 @ Brann W 2-1 1744 1804 24.0% 23.1% 52.9% +12.3 10
1997-05-16 Tromso W 2-1 1722 1767 39.0% 23.9% 37.1% +9.2 8
1997-05-16 @ Molde L 1-2 1767 1722 37.1% 23.9% 39.0% -9.2 6
1997-05-16 Haugesund W 5-0 1891 1579 75.4% 17.0% 7.6% +9.6 12
1997-05-16 @ Rosenborg L 0-5 1579 1891 7.6% 17.0% 75.4% -9.6 7
1997-05-16 Kongsvinger L 0-2 1607 1704 31.8% 23.8% 44.5% -16.3 4
1997-05-16 @ Skeid W 2-0 1704 1607 44.5% 23.8% 31.8% +16.3 14
1997-05-16 Sogndal W 3-1 1683 1548 61.1% 21.8% 17.2% +8.3 15
1997-05-16 @ Stromsgodset L 1-3 1548 1683 17.2% 21.8% 61.1% -8.3 4
1997-05-16 Stabaek W 5-1 1781 1773 46.4% 23.6% 29.9% +24.6 12
1997-05-16 @ Viking L 1-5 1773 1781 29.9% 23.6% 46.4% -24.5 11
1997-05-19 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1569 1766 20.7% 22.6% 56.7% +2.0 8
1997-05-19 @ Haugesund D 1-1 1766 1569 56.7% 22.6% 20.7% -2.0 10
1997-05-19 Molde L 1-3 1721 1731 43.9% 23.8% 32.4% -18.2 14
1997-05-19 @ Kongsvinger W 3-1 1731 1721 32.4% 23.8% 43.9% +18.2 11
1997-05-19 Viking W 2-0 1756 1806 38.4% 23.9% 37.7% +18.6 13
1997-05-19 @ Lillestrom L 0-2 1806 1756 37.7% 23.9% 38.4% -18.6 12
1997-05-19 Stromsgodset L 1-3 1513 1691 22.6% 22.9% 54.5% -10.6 5
1997-05-19 @ Lyn Oslo W 3-1 1691 1513 54.5% 22.9% 22.6% +10.6 18
1997-05-19 Skeid L 1-2 1540 1590 38.2% 23.9% 37.9% -9.4 4
1997-05-19 @ Sogndal W 2-1 1590 1540 37.9% 23.9% 38.2% +9.4 7
1997-05-19 Rosenborg L 0-3 1748 1900 25.3% 23.2% 51.5% -19.6 11
1997-05-19 @ Stabaek W 3-0 1900 1748 51.5% 23.2% 25.3% +19.6 15
1997-05-19 Brann W 3-0 1758 1792 40.6% 23.9% 35.5% +25.8 9
1997-05-19 @ Tromso L 0-3 1792 1758 35.5% 23.9% 40.6% -25.8 13
1997-05-25 Stabaek D 1-1 1764 1729 49.9% 23.4% 26.7% -1.3 11
1997-05-25 @ Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1729 1764 26.7% 23.4% 49.9% +1.3 12
1997-05-25 Kongsvinger W 3-1 1766 1702 53.3% 23.0% 23.6% +11.0 16
1997-05-25 @ Brann L 1-3 1702 1766 23.6% 23.0% 53.3% -11.0 14
1997-05-25 Tromso D 1-1 1775 1784 44.1% 23.8% 32.2% -0.6 14
1997-05-25 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1784 1775 32.2% 23.8% 44.1% +0.6 10
1997-05-25 Sogndal W 2-0 1749 1530 68.6% 19.7% 11.7% +6.5 14
1997-05-25 @ Molde L 0-2 1530 1749 11.7% 19.7% 68.6% -6.5 4
1997-05-25 Lyn Oslo W 3-0 1600 1503 57.1% 22.5% 20.4% +16.2 10
1997-05-25 @ Skeid L 0-3 1503 1600 20.4% 22.5% 57.1% -16.2 5
1997-05-25 Haugesund W 1-0 1702 1571 60.6% 21.8% 17.5% +5.1 21
1997-05-25 @ Stromsgodset L 0-1 1571 1702 17.5% 21.8% 60.6% -5.2 8
1997-05-25 Rosenborg D 1-1 1787 1920 27.5% 23.5% 49.1% +1.2 13
1997-05-25 @ Viking D 1-1 1920 1787 49.1% 23.5% 27.5% -1.2 16
1997-05-29 Molde W 4-0 1763 1756 46.2% 23.7% 30.1% +29.6 14
1997-05-29 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-4 1756 1763 30.1% 23.7% 46.2% -29.6 14
1997-05-29 Skeid W 2-1 1566 1616 38.3% 23.9% 37.8% +9.3 11
1997-05-29 @ Haugesund L 1-2 1616 1566 37.8% 23.9% 38.3% -9.3 10
1997-05-29 Stromsgodset L 0-1 1730 1707 48.3% 23.5% 28.1% -12.1 12
1997-05-29 @ Stabaek W 1-0 1707 1730 28.1% 23.5% 48.3% +12.1 24
1997-05-29 Viking D 1-1 1785 1788 44.8% 23.7% 31.5% -0.7 11
1997-05-29 @ Tromso D 1-1 1788 1785 31.5% 23.7% 44.8% +0.7 14
1997-05-29 Lyn Oslo D 1-1 1691 1486 67.4% 20.1% 12.5% -3.2 15
1997-05-29 @ Kongsvinger D 1-1 1486 1691 12.5% 20.1% 67.4% +3.2 6
1997-06-01 Lyn Oslo D 0-0 1777 1490 73.7% 17.7% 8.6% -4.3 17
1997-06-01 @ Brann D 0-0 1490 1777 8.6% 17.7% 73.7% +4.3 7
1997-06-01 Sogndal L 1-3 1774 1524 71.1% 18.8% 10.1% -27.6 14
1997-06-01 @ Lillestrom W 3-1 1524 1774 10.1% 18.8% 71.1% +27.6 7
1997-06-01 Haugesund W 1-0 1726 1575 62.6% 21.4% 16.0% +4.7 17
1997-06-01 @ Molde L 0-1 1575 1726 16.0% 21.4% 62.6% -4.7 11
1997-06-01 Stabaek L 1-3 1607 1718 30.1% 23.7% 46.3% -13.5 10
1997-06-01 @ Skeid W 3-1 1718 1607 46.3% 23.7% 30.1% +13.5 15
1997-06-01 Rosenborg L 1-5 1719 1919 20.5% 22.5% 57.0% -17.8 24
1997-06-01 @ Stromsgodset W 5-1 1919 1719 57.0% 22.5% 20.5% +17.8 19
1997-06-01 Kongsvinger W 2-1 1784 1688 57.0% 22.5% 20.5% +5.6 14
1997-06-01 @ Tromso L 1-2 1688 1784 20.5% 22.5% 57.0% -5.6 15
1997-06-01 Bodo Glimt W 4-2 1789 1793 44.8% 23.7% 31.4% +12.5 17
1997-06-01 @ Viking L 2-4 1793 1789 31.4% 23.7% 44.8% -12.5 14
1997-06-04 Stabaek L 0-1 1790 1731 52.7% 23.1% 24.2% -13.0 14
1997-06-04 @ Tromso W 1-0 1731 1790 24.2% 23.1% 52.7% +13.0 18
1997-06-15 Stromsgodset W 2-1 1780 1701 55.1% 22.8% 22.1% +6.0 17
1997-06-15 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1701 1780 22.1% 22.8% 55.1% -6.0 24
1997-06-15 Brann L 0-1 1570 1773 20.2% 22.5% 57.3% -5.9 11
1997-06-15 @ Haugesund W 1-0 1773 1570 57.3% 22.5% 20.2% +5.9 20
1997-06-15 Skeid W 5-1 1936 1593 77.3% 16.0% 6.6% +5.5 22
1997-06-15 @ Rosenborg L 1-5 1593 1936 6.6% 16.0% 77.3% -5.5 10
1997-06-15 Tromso D 2-2 1551 1777 18.3% 22.0% 59.7% +1.8 8
1997-06-15 @ Sogndal D 2-2 1777 1551 59.7% 22.0% 18.3% -1.8 15
1997-06-15 Molde L 0-1 1744 1731 47.0% 23.6% 29.3% -11.8 18
1997-06-15 @ Stabaek W 1-0 1731 1744 29.3% 23.6% 47.0% +11.8 20
1997-06-15 Kongsvinger W 1-0 1802 1683 59.5% 22.1% 18.5% +5.4 20
1997-06-15 @ Viking L 0-1 1683 1802 18.5% 22.1% 59.5% -5.4 15
1997-06-18 Lillestrom W 2-0 1677 1747 35.6% 23.9% 40.6% +19.7 18
1997-06-18 @ Kongsvinger L 0-2 1747 1677 40.6% 23.9% 35.6% -19.7 14
1997-06-18 Molde L 1-3 1494 1743 16.4% 21.5% 62.1% -7.9 7
1997-06-18 @ Lyn Oslo W 3-1 1743 1494 62.1% 21.5% 16.4% +7.9 23
1997-06-18 Bodo Glimt W 1-0 1942 1786 63.1% 21.3% 15.6% +4.6 25
1997-06-18 @ Rosenborg L 0-1 1786 1942 15.6% 21.3% 63.1% -4.6 17
1997-06-18 Tromso W 2-0 1732 1775 39.4% 23.9% 36.7% +18.2 21
1997-06-18 @ Stabaek L 0-2 1775 1732 36.7% 23.9% 39.4% -18.2 15
1997-06-22 Brann W 1-0 1553 1779 18.2% 22.0% 59.7% +14.6 11
1997-06-22 @ Sogndal L 0-1 1779 1553 59.7% 22.0% 18.2% -14.5 20
1997-06-22 Haugesund L 1-2 1727 1565 63.7% 21.1% 15.2% -14.5 14
1997-06-22 @ Lillestrom W 2-1 1565 1727 15.2% 21.1% 63.7% +14.5 14
1997-06-22 Rosenborg L 0-4 1751 1947 20.8% 22.6% 56.6% -21.6 23
1997-06-22 @ Molde W 4-0 1947 1751 56.6% 22.6% 20.8% +21.6 28
1997-06-22 Bodo Glimt L 0-1 1588 1781 21.0% 22.6% 56.4% -6.1 10
1997-06-22 @ Skeid W 1-0 1781 1588 56.4% 22.6% 21.0% +6.1 20
1997-06-22 Viking L 0-2 1695 1807 30.0% 23.7% 46.4% -15.6 24
1997-06-22 @ Stromsgodset W 2-0 1807 1695 46.4% 23.7% 30.0% +15.6 23
1997-06-22 Lyn Oslo W 2-0 1757 1486 72.5% 18.2% 9.3% +5.1 18
1997-06-22 @ Tromso L 0-2 1486 1757 9.3% 18.2% 72.5% -5.1 7
1997-06-29 Rosenborg L 1-2 1764 1968 20.1% 22.4% 57.5% -5.5 20
1997-06-29 @ Brann W 2-1 1968 1764 57.5% 22.4% 20.1% +5.5 31
1997-06-29 Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1729 1788 37.1% 23.9% 39.0% +9.6 26
1997-06-29 @ Molde L 1-2 1788 1729 39.0% 23.9% 37.1% -9.6 20
1997-06-29 Stromsgodset L 1-5 1582 1680 31.7% 23.8% 44.5% -25.8 10
1997-06-29 @ Skeid W 5-1 1680 1582 44.5% 23.8% 31.7% +25.8 27
1997-06-29 Viking D 1-1 1568 1823 16.0% 21.4% 62.6% +2.7 12
1997-06-29 @ Sogndal D 1-1 1823 1568 62.6% 21.4% 16.0% -2.7 24
1997-06-29 Haugesund W 1-0 1762 1579 65.5% 20.6% 13.8% +4.1 21
1997-06-29 @ Tromso L 0-1 1579 1762 13.8% 20.6% 65.5% -4.1 14
1997-07-02 Lillestrom L 0-4 1481 1712 17.8% 21.9% 60.3% -18.7 7
1997-07-02 @ Lyn Oslo W 4-0 1712 1481 60.3% 21.9% 17.8% +18.7 17
1997-07-02 Stabaek W 5-1 1759 1751 46.4% 23.7% 30.0% +24.6 23
1997-07-02 @ Brann L 1-5 1751 1759 30.0% 23.7% 46.4% -24.6 21
1997-07-02 Sogndal W 2-1 1697 1570 60.2% 21.9% 17.8% +4.9 21
1997-07-02 @ Kongsvinger L 1-2 1570 1697 17.8% 21.9% 60.2% -4.9 12
1997-07-07 Brann L 0-3 1778 1783 44.6% 23.8% 31.7% -30.9 20
1997-07-07 @ Bodo Glimt W 3-0 1783 1778 31.7% 23.8% 44.6% +30.9 26
1997-07-07 Sogndal W 5-2 1462 1565 31.1% 23.7% 45.2% +22.8 10
1997-07-07 @ Lyn Oslo L 2-5 1565 1462 45.2% 23.7% 31.1% -22.8 12
1997-07-07 Stromsgodset W 2-0 1739 1705 49.6% 23.4% 26.9% +14.2 29
1997-07-07 @ Molde L 0-2 1705 1739 26.9% 23.4% 49.6% -14.2 27
1997-07-07 Lillestrom W 3-0 1974 1731 70.5% 19.0% 10.5% +8.5 34
1997-07-07 @ Rosenborg L 0-3 1731 1974 10.5% 19.0% 70.5% -8.4 17
1997-07-07 Skeid W 4-0 1820 1556 72.1% 18.4% 9.5% +9.9 27
1997-07-07 @ Viking L 0-4 1556 1820 9.5% 18.4% 72.1% -9.9 10
1997-07-13 Stromsgodset W 4-1 1814 1691 59.9% 22.0% 18.1% +12.3 29
1997-07-13 @ Brann L 1-4 1691 1814 18.1% 22.0% 59.9% -12.3 27
1997-07-13 Bodo Glimt W 3-1 1723 1747 41.9% 23.8% 34.2% +15.0 20
1997-07-13 @ Lillestrom L 1-3 1747 1723 34.2% 23.8% 41.9% -15.0 20
1997-07-13 Viking D 4-4 1485 1830 10.6% 19.1% 70.3% +1.9 11
1997-07-13 @ Lyn Oslo D 4-4 1830 1485 70.3% 19.1% 10.6% -1.9 28
1997-07-13 Skeid D 3-3 1753 1546 67.6% 20.0% 12.4% -2.0 30
1997-07-13 @ Molde D 3-3 1546 1753 12.4% 20.0% 67.6% +2.0 11
1997-07-13 Haugesund W 2-1 1543 1575 40.8% 23.9% 35.3% +8.9 15
1997-07-13 @ Sogndal L 1-2 1575 1543 35.3% 23.9% 40.8% -8.9 14
1997-07-13 Rosenborg D 1-1 1766 1982 19.0% 22.2% 58.8% +2.3 22
1997-07-13 @ Tromso D 1-1 1982 1766 58.8% 22.2% 19.0% -2.3 35
1997-07-23 Stabaek L 0-2 1738 1726 46.8% 23.6% 29.5% -22.1 20
1997-07-23 @ Lillestrom W 2-0 1726 1738 29.5% 23.6% 46.8% +22.2 24
1997-07-23 Kongsvinger D 3-3 1566 1702 27.1% 23.4% 49.5% +0.8 15
1997-07-23 @ Haugesund D 3-3 1702 1566 49.5% 23.4% 27.1% -0.8 22
1997-07-27 Tromso W 5-1 1732 1768 40.4% 23.9% 35.8% +28.3 23
1997-07-27 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-5 1768 1732 35.8% 23.9% 40.4% -28.3 22
1997-07-27 Lyn Oslo W 1-0 1567 1487 55.2% 22.8% 22.0% +6.4 18
1997-07-27 @ Haugesund L 0-1 1487 1567 22.0% 22.8% 55.2% -6.3 11
1997-07-27 Kongsvinger W 3-1 1980 1701 73.1% 18.0% 8.9% +4.2 38
1997-07-27 @ Rosenborg L 1-3 1701 1980 8.9% 18.0% 73.1% -4.2 22
1997-07-27 Brann D 1-1 1548 1826 14.3% 20.8% 64.8% +3.0 12
1997-07-27 @ Skeid D 1-1 1826 1548 64.8% 20.8% 14.3% -2.9 30
1997-07-27 Sogndal W 1-0 1748 1551 66.8% 20.3% 13.0% +3.8 27
1997-07-27 @ Stabaek L 0-1 1551 1748 13.0% 20.3% 66.8% -3.8 15
1997-07-27 Lillestrom W 4-2 1679 1715 40.2% 23.9% 35.9% +13.9 30
1997-07-27 @ Stromsgodset L 2-4 1715 1679 35.9% 23.9% 40.2% -13.9 20
1997-07-27 Molde L 2-3 1828 1751 54.9% 22.8% 22.3% -12.1 28
1997-07-27 @ Viking W 3-2 1751 1828 22.3% 22.8% 54.9% +12.1 33
1997-08-03 Molde L 0-4 1824 1763 53.0% 23.1% 23.9% -46.7 30
1997-08-03 @ Brann W 4-0 1763 1824 23.9% 23.1% 53.0% +46.7 36
1997-08-03 Viking W 1-0 1573 1816 16.9% 21.7% 61.4% +14.9 21
1997-08-03 @ Haugesund L 0-1 1816 1573 61.4% 21.7% 16.9% -14.9 28
1997-08-03 Bodo Glimt D 0-0 1697 1760 36.4% 23.9% 39.7% +0.2 23
1997-08-03 @ Kongsvinger D 0-0 1760 1697 39.7% 23.9% 36.4% -0.2 24
1997-08-03 Skeid D 2-2 1702 1551 62.6% 21.4% 16.0% -2.0 21
1997-08-03 @ Lillestrom D 2-2 1551 1702 16.0% 21.4% 62.6% +2.0 13
1997-08-03 Stabaek L 0-1 1481 1752 14.8% 21.0% 64.2% -4.4 11
1997-08-03 @ Lyn Oslo W 1-0 1752 1481 64.2% 21.0% 14.8% +4.4 30
1997-08-03 Rosenborg L 0-7 1548 1984 6.9% 16.4% 76.7% -11.9 15
1997-08-03 @ Sogndal W 7-0 1984 1548 76.7% 16.4% 6.9% +11.9 41
1997-08-03 Stromsgodset D 1-1 1740 1693 51.3% 23.3% 25.4% -1.4 23
1997-08-03 @ Tromso D 1-1 1693 1740 25.4% 23.3% 51.3% +1.4 31
1997-08-09 Lillestrom D 1-1 1810 1700 58.5% 22.3% 19.2% -2.2 37
1997-08-09 @ Molde D 1-1 1700 1810 19.2% 22.3% 58.5% +2.2 22
1997-08-09 Brann D 0-0 1801 1777 48.5% 23.5% 28.0% -1.2 29
1997-08-09 @ Viking D 0-0 1777 1801 28.0% 23.5% 48.5% +1.2 31
1997-08-10 Sogndal W 1-0 1760 1536 69.0% 19.5% 11.4% +3.4 27
1997-08-10 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-1 1536 1760 11.4% 19.5% 69.0% -3.4 15
1997-08-10 Lyn Oslo W 5-1 1996 1476 86.2% 10.9% 2.8% +2.1 44
1997-08-10 @ Rosenborg L 1-5 1476 1996 2.8% 10.9% 86.2% -2.1 11
1997-08-10 Tromso L 0-4 1553 1738 21.8% 22.8% 55.4% -22.5 13
1997-08-10 @ Skeid W 4-0 1738 1553 55.4% 22.8% 21.8% +22.6 26
1997-08-10 Haugesund W 2-1 1756 1588 64.2% 21.0% 14.8% +4.1 33
1997-08-10 @ Stabaek L 1-2 1588 1756 14.8% 21.0% 64.2% -4.1 21
1997-08-10 Kongsvinger W 8-0 1694 1697 44.9% 23.7% 31.4% +58.9 34
1997-08-10 @ Stromsgodset L 0-8 1697 1694 31.4% 23.7% 44.9% -58.9 23
1997-08-13 Stabaek L 1-2 1638 1761 28.7% 23.6% 47.8% -7.5 23
1997-08-13 @ Kongsvinger W 2-1 1761 1638 47.8% 23.6% 28.7% +7.5 36
1997-08-23 Rosenborg L 2-6 1584 1998 7.7% 17.0% 75.3% -5.6 21
1997-08-23 @ Haugesund W 6-2 1998 1584 75.3% 17.0% 7.7% +5.6 47
1997-08-23 Brann D 2-2 1702 1778 34.6% 23.8% 41.5% +0.3 23
1997-08-23 @ Lillestrom D 2-2 1778 1702 41.5% 23.8% 34.6% -0.3 32
1997-08-23 Viking W 2-1 1768 1800 41.0% 23.9% 35.2% +8.8 39
1997-08-23 @ Stabaek L 1-2 1800 1768 35.2% 23.9% 41.0% -8.8 29
1997-08-24 Skeid W 3-0 1631 1530 57.5% 22.4% 20.1% +16.0 26
1997-08-24 @ Kongsvinger L 0-3 1530 1631 20.1% 22.4% 57.5% -16.0 13
1997-08-24 Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1474 1764 13.7% 20.6% 65.8% -3.8 11
1997-08-24 @ Lyn Oslo W 2-1 1764 1474 65.8% 20.6% 13.7% +3.8 30
1997-08-24 Stromsgodset D 3-3 1532 1753 18.6% 22.1% 59.2% +1.4 16
1997-08-24 @ Sogndal D 3-3 1753 1532 59.2% 22.1% 18.6% -1.4 35
1997-08-24 Molde D 4-4 1761 1808 38.8% 23.9% 37.3% -0.0 27
1997-08-24 @ Tromso D 4-4 1808 1761 37.3% 23.9% 38.8% +0.0 38
1997-08-31 Haugesund D 1-1 1767 1578 66.1% 20.5% 13.4% -3.1 31
1997-08-31 @ Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1578 1767 13.4% 20.5% 66.1% +3.1 22
1997-08-31 Tromso W 4-3 1778 1761 47.5% 23.6% 28.9% +7.0 35
1997-08-31 @ Brann L 3-4 1761 1778 28.9% 23.6% 47.5% -7.0 27
1997-08-31 Kongsvinger L 0-1 1808 1647 63.6% 21.2% 15.3% -15.4 38
1997-08-31 @ Molde W 1-0 1647 1808 15.3% 21.2% 63.6% +15.4 29
1997-08-31 Stabaek W 5-0 2004 1777 69.2% 19.5% 11.3% +14.7 50
1997-08-31 @ Rosenborg L 0-5 1777 2004 11.3% 19.5% 69.2% -14.7 39
1997-08-31 Sogndal L 1-3 1514 1534 42.6% 23.8% 33.6% -17.8 13
1997-08-31 @ Skeid W 3-1 1534 1514 33.6% 23.8% 42.6% +17.8 19
1997-08-31 Lyn Oslo W 6-1 1752 1470 73.3% 17.9% 8.8% +9.3 38
1997-08-31 @ Stromsgodset L 1-6 1470 1752 8.8% 17.9% 73.3% -9.3 11
1997-08-31 Lillestrom L 0-1 1791 1702 56.2% 22.7% 21.1% -13.8 29
1997-08-31 @ Viking W 1-0 1702 1791 21.1% 22.7% 56.2% +13.8 26
1997-09-13 Stromsgodset D 1-1 1582 1761 22.4% 22.9% 54.7% +1.8 23
1997-09-13 @ Haugesund D 1-1 1761 1582 54.7% 22.9% 22.4% -1.8 39
1997-09-13 Brann L 4-6 1662 1785 28.6% 23.6% 47.8% -10.6 29
1997-09-13 @ Kongsvinger W 6-4 1785 1662 47.8% 23.6% 28.6% +10.6 38
1997-09-13 Skeid W 2-0 1461 1496 40.4% 23.9% 35.7% +17.9 14
1997-09-13 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-2 1496 1461 35.7% 23.9% 40.4% -17.9 13
1997-09-13 Viking D 2-2 2018 1777 70.4% 19.1% 10.6% -2.6 51
1997-09-13 @ Rosenborg D 2-2 1777 2018 10.6% 19.1% 70.4% +2.6 30
1997-09-13 Molde D 3-3 1552 1792 17.0% 21.7% 61.2% +1.6 20
1997-09-13 @ Sogndal D 3-3 1792 1552 61.2% 21.7% 17.0% -1.6 39
1997-09-13 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1762 1764 45.0% 23.7% 31.2% -0.7 40
1997-09-13 @ Stabaek D 1-1 1764 1762 31.2% 23.7% 45.0% +0.7 32
1997-09-13 Lillestrom L 1-3 1754 1716 50.2% 23.4% 26.4% -20.4 27
1997-09-13 @ Tromso W 3-1 1716 1754 26.4% 23.4% 50.2% +20.4 29
1997-09-20 Rosenborg D 2-2 1765 2016 16.3% 21.5% 62.2% +2.0 33
1997-09-20 @ Bodo Glimt D 2-2 2016 1765 62.2% 21.5% 16.3% -2.0 52
1997-09-21 Sogndal W 4-1 1795 1553 70.4% 19.0% 10.5% +7.2 41
1997-09-21 @ Brann L 1-4 1553 1795 10.5% 19.0% 70.4% -7.1 20
1997-09-21 Kongsvinger L 1-3 1736 1651 55.8% 22.7% 21.5% -22.3 29
1997-09-21 @ Lillestrom W 3-1 1651 1736 21.5% 22.7% 55.8% +22.3 32
1997-09-21 Lyn Oslo W 3-0 1791 1479 75.3% 17.0% 7.7% +6.0 42
1997-09-21 @ Molde L 0-3 1479 1791 7.7% 17.0% 75.3% -6.0 14
1997-09-21 Haugesund L 0-3 1479 1583 30.9% 23.7% 45.4% -23.1 13
1997-09-21 @ Skeid W 3-0 1583 1479 45.4% 23.7% 30.9% +23.1 26
1997-09-21 Stabaek W 2-0 1759 1762 45.0% 23.7% 31.3% +16.1 42
1997-09-21 @ Stromsgodset L 0-2 1762 1759 31.3% 23.7% 45.0% -16.1 40
1997-09-21 Tromso D 1-1 1780 1733 51.2% 23.3% 25.5% -1.4 31
1997-09-21 @ Viking D 1-1 1733 1780 25.5% 23.3% 51.2% +1.4 28
1997-10-04 Stromsgodset W 6-1 2014 1775 70.2% 19.1% 10.7% +11.5 55
1997-10-04 @ Rosenborg L 1-6 1775 2014 10.7% 19.1% 70.2% -11.5 42
1997-10-05 Viking L 0-3 1767 1778 43.8% 23.8% 32.4% -30.4 33
1997-10-05 @ Bodo Glimt W 3-0 1778 1767 32.4% 23.8% 43.8% +30.4 34
1997-10-05 Molde W 2-1 1606 1797 21.4% 22.7% 55.9% +12.9 29
1997-10-05 @ Haugesund L 1-2 1797 1606 55.9% 22.7% 21.4% -12.9 42
1997-10-05 Tromso W 3-1 1674 1735 36.8% 23.9% 39.4% +16.7 35
1997-10-05 @ Kongsvinger L 1-3 1735 1674 39.4% 23.9% 36.8% -16.7 28
1997-10-05 Brann L 1-5 1473 1802 11.4% 19.5% 69.1% -10.0 14
1997-10-05 @ Lyn Oslo W 5-1 1802 1473 69.1% 19.5% 11.4% +10.0 44
1997-10-05 Lillestrom W 2-0 1546 1714 23.6% 23.0% 53.4% +24.8 23
1997-10-05 @ Sogndal L 0-2 1714 1546 53.4% 23.0% 23.6% -24.8 29
1997-10-05 Skeid W 3-0 1745 1455 73.9% 17.6% 8.5% +6.7 43
1997-10-05 @ Stabaek L 0-3 1455 1745 8.5% 17.6% 73.9% -6.7 13
1997-10-11 Stabaek W 4-1 1784 1752 49.4% 23.4% 27.2% +17.6 45
1997-10-11 @ Molde L 1-4 1752 1784 27.2% 23.4% 49.4% -17.6 43
1997-10-12 Haugesund W 3-2 1812 1619 66.4% 20.4% 13.2% +3.5 47
1997-10-12 @ Brann L 2-3 1619 1812 13.2% 20.4% 66.4% -3.5 29
1997-10-12 Viking W 3-1 1690 1809 29.2% 23.6% 47.2% +19.3 38
1997-10-12 @ Kongsvinger L 1-3 1809 1690 47.2% 23.6% 29.2% -19.3 34
1997-10-12 Lyn Oslo W 2-0 1689 1463 69.2% 19.5% 11.3% +6.3 32
1997-10-12 @ Lillestrom L 0-2 1463 1689 11.3% 19.5% 69.2% -6.3 14
1997-10-12 Rosenborg L 0-5 1449 2025 3.6% 12.2% 84.2% -4.1 13
1997-10-12 @ Skeid W 5-0 2025 1449 84.2% 12.2% 3.6% +4.1 58
1997-10-12 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1764 1737 48.9% 23.5% 27.7% -1.2 43
1997-10-12 @ Stromsgodset D 1-1 1737 1764 27.7% 23.5% 48.9% +1.1 34
1997-10-12 Sogndal L 0-1 1718 1571 62.3% 21.5% 16.2% -15.1 28
1997-10-12 @ Tromso W 1-0 1571 1718 16.2% 21.5% 62.3% +15.1 26
1997-10-19 Skeid W 4-1 1738 1445 74.1% 17.5% 8.3% +5.5 37
1997-10-19 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-4 1445 1738 8.3% 17.5% 74.1% -5.5 13
1997-10-19 Lillestrom W 1-0 1616 1695 34.2% 23.8% 42.0% +10.7 32
1997-10-19 @ Haugesund L 0-1 1695 1616 42.0% 23.8% 34.2% -10.7 32
1997-10-19 Tromso W 4-0 1457 1703 16.6% 21.6% 61.8% +53.7 17
1997-10-19 @ Lyn Oslo L 0-4 1703 1457 61.8% 21.6% 16.6% -53.7 28
1997-10-19 Molde W 2-1 2029 1801 69.3% 19.4% 11.2% +3.1 61
1997-10-19 @ Rosenborg L 1-2 1801 2029 11.2% 19.4% 69.3% -3.1 45
1997-10-19 Kongsvinger W 2-1 1586 1710 28.5% 23.6% 47.9% +11.3 29
1997-10-19 @ Sogndal L 1-2 1710 1586 47.9% 23.6% 28.5% -11.3 38
1997-10-19 Brann L 0-1 1735 1816 33.9% 23.8% 42.2% -9.1 43
1997-10-19 @ Stabaek W 1-0 1816 1735 42.2% 23.8% 33.9% +9.1 50
1997-10-19 Stromsgodset L 1-3 1789 1763 48.8% 23.5% 27.7% -19.9 34
1997-10-19 @ Viking W 3-1 1763 1789 27.7% 23.5% 48.8% +19.9 46

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1997-06-01 10.14% Sogndal 1524 3 @ Lillestrom 1774 1
2 1997-05-08 11.29% Haugesund 1554 2 @ Viking 1781 0
3 1997-06-22 15.17% Haugesund 1565 2 @ Lillestrom 1727 1
4 1997-08-31 15.27% Kongsvinger 1647 1 @ Molde 1808 0
5 1997-10-12 16.24% Sogndal 1571 1 @ Tromso 1718 0
6 1997-10-19 16.60% @ Lyn Oslo 1457 4 Tromso 1703 0
7 1997-08-03 16.89% @ Haugesund 1573 1 Viking 1816 0
8 1997-05-04 17.34% Stromsgodset 1670 1 @ Lillestrom 1803 0
9 1997-05-08 18.07% @ Skeid 1561 5 Lillestrom 1789 1
10 1997-06-22 18.23% @ Sogndal 1553 1 Brann 1779 0
11 1997-08-31 21.14% Lillestrom 1702 1 @ Viking 1791 0
12 1997-05-11 21.37% Viking 1750 4 @ Brann 1836 1
13 1997-10-05 21.38% @ Haugesund 1606 2 Molde 1797 1
14 1997-09-21 21.52% Kongsvinger 1651 3 @ Lillestrom 1736 1
15 1997-07-27 22.28% Molde 1751 3 @ Viking 1828 2
16 1997-10-05 23.59% @ Sogndal 1546 2 Lillestrom 1714 0
17 1997-08-03 23.95% Molde 1763 4 @ Brann 1824 0
18 1997-05-16 23.97% Lillestrom 1744 2 @ Brann 1804 1
19 1997-06-04 24.18% Stabaek 1731 1 @ Tromso 1790 0
20 1997-09-13 26.41% Lillestrom 1716 3 @ Tromso 1754 1
21 1997-10-19 27.69% Stromsgodset 1763 3 @ Viking 1789 1
22 1997-05-29 28.14% Stromsgodset 1707 1 @ Stabaek 1730 0
23 1997-10-19 28.51% @ Sogndal 1586 2 Kongsvinger 1710 1
24 1997-10-12 29.19% @ Kongsvinger 1690 3 Viking 1809 1
25 1997-06-15 29.34% Molde 1731 1 @ Stabaek 1744 0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1997-08-10 58.93 @ Stromsgodset 8 1694 44.90% Kongsvinger 0 1697 31.37% 23.73%
2 1997-10-19 53.68 @ Lyn Oslo 4 1457 16.60% Tromso 0 1703 61.81% 21.59%
3 1997-08-03 46.74 Molde 4 1763 23.95% @ Brann 0 1824 52.97% 23.08%
4 1997-05-08 43.51 @ Skeid 5 1561 18.07% Lillestrom 1 1789 59.94% 21.99%
5 1997-04-26 32.94 Brann 4 1781 41.76% @ Stromsgodset 0 1703 34.40% 23.84%
6 1997-05-11 31.67 Viking 4 1750 21.37% @ Brann 1 1836 55.95% 22.69%
7 1997-05-08 31.26 Haugesund 2 1554 11.29% @ Viking 0 1781 69.25% 19.46%
8 1997-07-07 30.89 Brann 3 1783 31.66% @ Bodo Glimt 0 1778 44.59% 23.75%
9 1997-10-05 30.43 Viking 3 1778 32.44% @ Bodo Glimt 0 1767 43.78% 23.78%
10 1997-05-04 30.03 @ Lyn Oslo 3 1496 33.14% Haugesund 0 1584 43.05% 23.81%
11 1997-05-08 29.66 @ Bodo Glimt 4 1728 46.18% Kongsvinger 0 1722 30.15% 23.67%
12 1997-05-29 29.62 @ Bodo Glimt 4 1763 46.23% Molde 0 1756 30.10% 23.66%
13 1997-07-27 28.30 @ Bodo Glimt 5 1732 40.35% Tromso 1 1768 35.78% 23.87%
14 1997-06-01 27.65 Sogndal 3 1524 10.14% @ Lillestrom 1 1774 71.06% 18.80%
15 1997-04-25 27.31 @ Haugesund 3 1556 37.94% Sogndal 0 1609 38.17% 23.89%
16 1997-04-13 26.46 @ Stromsgodset 4 1658 50.39% Skeid 0 1619 26.25% 23.35%
17 1997-05-19 25.83 @ Tromso 3 1758 40.65% Brann 0 1792 35.49% 23.87%
18 1997-06-29 25.75 Stromsgodset 5 1680 44.51% @ Skeid 1 1582 31.73% 23.75%
19 1997-04-12 24.80 @ Stabaek 4 1728 34.21% Lillestrom 1 1807 41.95% 23.84%
20 1997-10-05 24.80 @ Sogndal 2 1546 23.59% Lillestrom 0 1714 53.38% 23.04%
21 1997-07-02 24.60 @ Brann 5 1759 46.36% Stabaek 1 1751 29.98% 23.66%
22 1997-05-16 24.56 @ Viking 5 1781 46.44% Stabaek 1 1773 29.91% 23.65%
23 1997-09-21 23.14 Haugesund 3 1583 45.42% @ Skeid 0 1479 30.87% 23.71%
24 1997-07-07 22.81 @ Lyn Oslo 5 1462 31.09% Sogndal 2 1565 45.19% 23.72%
25 1997-08-10 22.56 Tromso 4 1738 55.42% @ Skeid 0 1553 21.82% 22.76%