Home / Leagues / Norway / Tippeligaen / 1995
‹ ›

1995 Tippeligaen Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

62 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Molde

14.13 points above expected

47 points · 32.87 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Start

8.88 points below expected

34 points · 42.88 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Rosenborg 26 19 5 2 62 78 29 +49 55.86 +6.14
2 Molde 26 14 5 7 47 60 47 +13 32.87 +14.13
3 Bodo Glimt 26 12 7 7 43 65 43 +22 37.65 +5.35
4 Lillestrom 26 11 8 7 41 50 36 +14 47.90 -6.90
5 Viking 26 12 4 10 40 55 42 +13 47.27 -7.27
6 Valerenga 26 11 6 9 39 47 44 +3 32.68 +6.32
7 Tromso 26 11 5 10 38 53 42 +11 38.99 -0.99
8 Start 26 11 1 14 34 51 52 -1 42.88 -8.88
9 Stabaek 26 9 6 11 33 36 40 -4 28.48 +4.52
10 Brann 26 9 5 12 32 40 50 -10 31.28 +0.72
11 Kongsvinger 26 7 8 11 29 37 54 -17 35.26 -6.26
12 Hodd 26 8 4 14 28 38 57 -19 26.63 +1.37
13 Hamarkameratene 26 8 3 15 27 33 66 -33 31.04 -4.04
14 Strindheim 26 4 5 17 17 36 77 -41 19.59 -2.59

Form

Each team's 5-game rolling points-per-game across the season. Hot streaks push above the dashed 1.5 PPG reference line; cold spells drop below. Each team gets a distinct color; the legend below the plot lets you read off which line is which. (First 4 games of each team have no rolling window, so the lines start at game 5.)

League Race

Cumulative points across the season for each team. Highlighted teams are drawn in color (top finishers for the Title Race, bottom finishers for the Relegation Race); the rest of the league appears in light gray as context. Switch views with the buttons below.

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Rosenborg 1836 62 55.86 +6.14 86.4% 29 46 52 56 60 65 76
Bodo Glimt 1715 43 37.65 +5.35 81.5% 15 27 33 38 42 48 61
Lillestrom 1694 41 47.90 -6.90 16.4% 20 37 44 48 52 58 69
Viking 1670 40 47.27 -7.27 14.6% 24 36 43 47 52 58 71
Tromso 1669 38 38.99 -0.99 47.7% 17 28 35 39 43 50 65
Start 1632 34 42.88 -8.88 10.2% 19 32 38 43 47 54 70
Valerenga 1599 39 32.68 +6.32 77.2% 8 22 28 33 37 43 61
Molde 1556 47 32.87 +14.13 98.8% 9 22 28 33 37 44 55
Brann 1548 32 31.28 +0.72 58.2% 9 21 27 31 35 42 57
Stabaek 1538 33 28.48 +4.52 78.7% 7 18 24 28 33 39 52
Kongsvinger 1534 29 35.26 -6.26 18.4% 11 25 31 35 40 46 58
Hodd 1501 28 26.63 +1.37 63.0% 5 17 22 27 31 37 49
Hamarkameratene 1500 27 31.04 -4.04 28.9% 9 21 27 31 35 42 58
Strindheim 1383 17 19.59 -2.59 37.2% 3 11 16 19 23 29 45

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team BG BRA HAM HOD KON LIL MOL ROS STA STA STR TRO VAL VIK
Bodo Glimt —
1-0-1
3.63
2-0-0
3.18
1-1-0
3.60
1-1-0
2.80
0-2-0
2.21
2-0-0
2.84
0-1-1
1.40
0-0-2
3.67
1-0-1
2.20
1-1-0
4.16
1-0-1
2.46
1-1-0
2.88
1-0-1
2.52
Brann
1-0-1
1.96
 —
2-0-0
2.60
0-0-2
3.00
0-1-1
2.67
1-1-0
1.64
0-0-2
3.27
0-1-1
1.19
1-0-1
2.96
0-0-2
1.79
1-1-0
3.68
1-1-0
2.16
1-0-1
2.47
1-0-1
1.78
Hamarkameratene
0-0-2
2.41
0-0-2
2.98
 —
1-0-1
2.96
1-0-1
2.54
0-1-1
1.43
0-0-2
2.74
0-0-2
1.15
1-0-1
2.90
1-1-0
1.99
1-1-0
3.80
0-0-2
2.24
2-0-0
2.30
1-0-1
1.53
Hodd
0-1-1
2.01
2-0-0
2.59
1-0-1
2.62
 —
1-0-1
2.15
0-0-2
1.42
0-1-1
2.33
0-0-2
0.99
0-1-1
2.91
2-0-0
1.59
1-1-0
3.18
0-0-2
1.62
1-0-1
1.86
0-0-2
1.34
Kongsvinger
0-1-1
2.79
1-1-0
2.92
1-0-1
3.05
1-0-1
3.44
 —
0-0-2
1.97
0-0-2
3.05
0-1-1
1.35
0-2-0
3.22
1-0-1
2.19
2-0-0
4.18
0-1-1
2.60
1-1-0
2.85
0-1-1
1.89
Lillestrom
0-2-0
3.37
0-1-1
3.98
1-1-0
4.20
2-0-0
4.21
2-0-0
3.63
 —
1-0-1
3.93
0-0-2
2.06
1-1-0
4.23
1-0-1
3.09
1-1-0
4.73
1-1-0
3.58
0-1-1
4.02
1-0-1
2.88
Molde
0-0-2
2.75
2-0-0
2.34
2-0-0
2.85
1-1-0
3.26
2-0-0
2.54
1-0-1
1.68
 —
0-1-1
1.21
1-0-1
3.06
2-0-0
2.02
2-0-0
4.06
0-1-1
2.51
0-1-1
2.94
1-1-0
1.63
Rosenborg
1-1-0
4.23
1-1-0
4.46
2-0-0
4.52
2-0-0
4.68
1-1-0
4.28
2-0-0
3.54
1-1-0
4.44
 —
1-0-1
4.69
2-0-0
3.85
2-0-0
4.86
2-0-0
4.18
1-0-1
4.47
1-1-0
3.65
Stabaek
2-0-0
1.94
1-0-1
2.62
1-0-1
2.68
1-1-0
2.67
0-2-0
2.36
0-1-1
1.40
1-0-1
2.52
1-0-1
0.98
 —
0-0-2
1.96
1-0-1
3.63
0-1-1
2.06
0-1-1
2.19
1-0-1
1.48
Start
1-0-1
3.39
2-0-0
3.82
0-1-1
3.61
0-0-2
4.03
1-0-1
3.41
1-0-1
2.49
0-0-2
3.58
0-0-2
1.75
2-0-0
3.66
 —
1-0-1
4.47
2-0-0
2.87
0-0-2
3.40
1-0-1
2.30
Strindheim
0-1-1
1.48
0-1-1
1.91
0-1-1
1.80
0-1-1
2.41
0-0-2
1.45
0-1-1
0.95
0-0-2
1.57
0-0-2
0.85
1-0-1
1.96
1-0-1
1.18
 —
1-0-1
1.36
0-0-2
1.69
1-0-1
1.06
Tromso
1-0-1
3.12
0-1-1
3.43
2-0-0
3.37
2-0-0
4.00
1-1-0
2.98
0-1-1
2.02
1-1-0
3.07
0-0-2
1.44
1-1-0
3.54
0-0-2
2.71
1-0-1
4.28
 —
1-0-1
3.16
1-0-1
1.90
Valerenga
0-1-1
2.72
1-0-1
3.11
0-0-2
3.29
1-0-1
3.74
0-1-1
2.74
1-1-0
1.60
1-1-0
2.64
1-0-1
1.18
1-1-0
3.40
2-0-0
2.20
2-0-0
3.93
1-0-1
2.43
 —
0-1-1
1.72
Viking
1-0-1
3.07
1-0-1
3.83
1-0-1
4.10
2-0-0
4.29
1-1-0
3.71
1-0-1
2.70
0-1-1
3.98
0-1-1
1.95
1-0-1
4.14
1-0-1
3.30
1-0-1
4.60
1-0-1
3.70
1-1-0
3.89
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.83 +7.5
Allowed 0.74 -7.4
Differential 0.93 +4.4

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.40%4.67%3.85%1.92%1.37%3.30%19.51%
14.67%6.04%7.69%6.59%3.57%1.10%29.67%
23.85%7.69%8.24%1.65%1.10%1.92%24.45%
31.92%6.59%1.65%1.10%0.27%0.27%11.81%
41.37%3.57%1.10%0.27%—0.82%7.14%
5+3.30%1.10%1.92%0.27%0.82%—7.42%
Total19.51%29.67%24.45%11.81%7.14%7.42%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.87 1.87 +0.00
SD 1.65 1.65 2.54
CV 0.88 0.88 —
Max 9 9 +8
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%——3.85%3.85%15.38%
1—7.69%11.54%———19.23%
2—3.85%7.69%—3.85%—15.38%
33.85%3.85%7.69%7.69%——23.08%
411.54%—————11.54%
5+7.69%—7.69%———15.38%
Total26.92%19.23%34.62%7.69%7.69%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.50 1.65 +0.85
SD 1.82 1.50 2.77
CV 0.73 0.90 —
Max 6 6 +6
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—11.54%3.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%26.92%
13.85%11.54%3.85%11.54%——30.77%
2—7.69%7.69%—3.85%—19.23%
3—7.69%————7.69%
4—7.69%7.69%———15.38%
5+———————
Total3.85%46.15%23.08%15.38%7.69%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.54 1.92 -0.38
SD 1.39 1.32 2.17
CV 0.90 0.69 —
Max 4 6 +3
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%3.85%3.85%——11.54%26.92%
13.85%—3.85%11.54%15.38%3.85%38.46%
23.85%15.38%3.85%3.85%——26.92%
3———————
4——3.85%———3.85%
5+3.85%—————3.85%
Total19.23%19.23%15.38%15.38%15.38%15.38%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.27 2.54 -1.27
SD 1.22 2.20 2.84
CV 0.96 0.86 —
Max 5 9 +5
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%—3.85%3.85%3.85%23.08%
13.85%7.69%7.69%3.85%7.69%3.85%34.62%
23.85%7.69%3.85%7.69%—3.85%26.92%
37.69%—————7.69%
4—3.85%————3.85%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total19.23%30.77%11.54%15.38%11.54%11.54%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.46 2.19 -0.73
SD 1.27 2.00 2.65
CV 0.87 0.91 —
Max 5 7 +4
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.54%—3.85%3.85%—7.69%26.92%
13.85%11.54%7.69%11.54%——34.62%
23.85%3.85%7.69%——3.85%19.23%
3—7.69%——3.85%—11.54%
4—3.85%————3.85%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total19.23%30.77%19.23%15.38%3.85%11.54%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.42 2.08 -0.65
SD 1.33 2.04 2.62
CV 0.94 0.98 —
Max 5 8 +4
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%3.85%————11.54%
13.85%11.54%7.69%15.38%——38.46%
27.69%3.85%7.69%———19.23%
33.85%11.54%—3.85%——19.23%
4—3.85%————3.85%
5+3.85%———3.85%—7.69%
Total26.92%34.62%15.38%19.23%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.92 1.38 +0.54
SD 1.49 1.20 1.88
CV 0.78 0.87 —
Max 6 4 +6
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%3.85%3.85%—3.85%15.38%
17.69%—3.85%3.85%——15.38%
23.85%7.69%19.23%3.85%——34.62%
3—11.54%3.85%———15.38%
4—3.85%3.85%———7.69%
5+3.85%—3.85%—3.85%—11.54%
Total15.38%26.92%38.46%11.54%3.85%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.31 1.81 +0.50
SD 1.78 1.47 2.52
CV 0.77 0.81 —
Max 7 7 +6
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
13.85%7.69%7.69%———19.23%
27.69%15.38%7.69%———30.77%
3—15.38%3.85%3.85%——23.08%
4—7.69%————7.69%
5+7.69%7.69%3.85%———19.23%
Total19.23%53.85%23.08%3.85%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.00 1.12 +1.88
SD 1.92 0.77 2.16
CV 0.64 0.69 —
Max 9 3 +8
Min 1 0 -1

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%7.69%15.38%——3.85%34.62%
13.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%—19.23%
23.85%3.85%11.54%——3.85%23.08%
37.69%11.54%————19.23%
43.85%—————3.85%
5+———————
Total26.92%26.92%30.77%3.85%3.85%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.38 1.54 -0.15
SD 1.27 1.45 2.17
CV 0.92 0.94 —
Max 4 5 +4
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%11.54%———19.23%
13.85%—11.54%11.54%7.69%—34.62%
2—11.54%———3.85%15.38%
3—7.69%————7.69%
43.85%7.69%———3.85%15.38%
5+——7.69%———7.69%
Total11.54%30.77%30.77%11.54%7.69%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.96 2.00 -0.04
SD 1.78 1.50 2.34
CV 0.91 0.75 —
Max 6 6 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%—7.69%—3.85%19.23%
13.85%11.54%11.54%7.69%7.69%7.69%50.00%
2—3.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%7.69%23.08%
3———————
4———————
5+———3.85%3.85%—7.69%
Total7.69%19.23%15.38%23.08%15.38%19.23%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.38 2.96 -1.58
SD 1.39 2.03 2.19
CV 1.00 0.69 —
Max 6 9 +2
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%3.85%—3.85%—15.38%
111.54%3.85%11.54%3.85%3.85%—34.62%
23.85%7.69%11.54%—3.85%—26.92%
3——3.85%———3.85%
4—7.69%———3.85%11.54%
5+7.69%—————7.69%
Total26.92%23.08%30.77%3.85%11.54%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.04 1.62 +0.42
SD 1.99 1.44 2.67
CV 0.98 0.89 —
Max 8 5 +8
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%—3.85%3.85%3.85%19.23%
17.69%3.85%11.54%3.85%——26.92%
23.85%11.54%15.38%3.85%——34.62%
3—7.69%3.85%———11.54%
4—3.85%————3.85%
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total15.38%30.77%34.62%11.54%3.85%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.81 1.69 +0.12
SD 1.81 1.23 2.32
CV 1.00 0.72 —
Max 9 5 +7
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%7.69%———19.23%
13.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%—19.23%
211.54%3.85%7.69%——3.85%26.92%
33.85%7.69%———3.85%15.38%
4———3.85%—3.85%7.69%
5+11.54%—————11.54%
Total34.62%23.08%19.23%7.69%3.85%11.54%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.12 1.62 +0.50
SD 1.68 1.77 2.50
CV 0.79 1.09 —
Max 6 6 +6
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Molde 47 32.87 +14.13
2 Valerenga 39 32.68 +6.32
3 Rosenborg 62 55.86 +6.14
4 Bodo Glimt 43 37.65 +5.35
5 Stabaek 33 28.48 +4.52

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Start 34 42.88 -8.88
2 Viking 40 47.27 -7.27
3 Lillestrom 41 47.90 -6.90
4 Kongsvinger 29 35.26 -6.26
5 Hamarkameratene 27 31.04 -4.04

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts W or D consecutively; Winless counts L or D consecutively.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Molde 6 Apr 22 – May 16 1 in 1,958
2 Strindheim 2 Sep 2 – Sep 8 1 in 76
3 Rosenborg 8 May 7 – Jun 18 1 in 57
4 Brann 3 Aug 27 – Sep 9 1 in 50
5 Bodo Glimt 4 Jul 30 – Aug 26 1 in 37

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Start 4 Aug 20 – Sep 10 1 in 309
2 Hamarkameratene 6 May 6 – Jun 2 1 in 121
3 Viking 2 Aug 18 – Aug 27 1 in 40
4 Tromso 3 May 3 – May 14 1 in 28
5 Lillestrom 3 Sep 2 – Sep 23 1 in 25

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Molde 7 Apr 22 – May 21 1 in 151
2 Strindheim 3 Aug 27 – Sep 8 1 in 44
3 Valerenga 6 Aug 6 – Sep 24 1 in 36
4 Stabaek 4 Sep 10 – Oct 8 1 in 32
5 Bodo Glimt 8 Jul 30 – Oct 1 1 in 32

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Lillestrom 5 Aug 20 – Sep 23 1 in 73
2 Start 4 Aug 20 – Sep 10 1 in 26
3 Hamarkameratene 8 May 3 – Jun 11 1 in 22
4 Strindheim 13 May 7 – Jul 30 1 in 19
5 Tromso 5 May 21 – Jun 14 1 in 9

Finish Position Heatmap

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team1234567891011121314
Rosenborg68.97%19.18%7.48%2.70%1.00%0.44%0.12%0.06%0.03%0.01%0.01%———
Molde0.10%0.69%2.47%4.50%6.96%9.29%11.61%12.00%12.76%11.85%10.75%8.74%6.12%2.16%
Bodo Glimt0.73%3.97%7.75%12.15%14.16%13.86%12.12%10.77%8.39%6.70%4.43%2.94%1.52%0.51%
Lillestrom13.45%29.66%23.45%14.37%8.28%5.02%2.78%1.61%0.77%0.30%0.21%0.07%0.02%0.01%
Viking11.67%26.29%24.38%15.66%9.80%5.34%3.00%1.75%1.04%0.61%0.26%0.16%0.04%—
Valerenga0.15%0.62%1.80%4.28%6.56%9.48%10.53%11.75%12.48%12.60%11.16%9.26%6.79%2.54%
Tromso1.07%5.10%9.30%13.39%16.14%14.69%12.46%8.89%7.26%4.89%3.70%1.84%1.01%0.26%
Start3.40%12.11%16.60%19.59%15.83%10.95%7.48%5.84%3.60%2.22%1.39%0.60%0.33%0.06%
Stabaek0.03%0.12%0.55%1.13%2.34%4.02%6.13%7.75%9.23%11.72%14.31%17.64%16.95%8.08%
Brann0.08%0.46%1.26%2.47%4.24%6.23%9.42%10.68%12.12%13.90%13.67%12.16%9.58%3.73%
Kongsvinger0.29%1.40%3.56%6.77%9.54%12.40%12.40%13.12%11.61%9.62%8.30%6.13%3.76%1.10%
Hodd—0.07%0.23%0.62%1.32%2.18%3.59%5.11%7.27%10.04%13.90%18.50%23.17%14.00%
Hamarkameratene0.06%0.33%1.17%2.34%3.74%5.93%8.05%9.98%12.06%13.16%13.84%13.36%11.61%4.37%
Strindheim———0.03%0.09%0.17%0.31%0.69%1.38%2.38%4.07%8.60%19.10%63.18%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Points Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 5% * Slight Edge: 5% to 15% * Clear Edge: 15% to 25% * Strong Edge: 25% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+17.58%
Clear Edge
48.90%19.78%31.32%
Elo Value
Home Edge
173 Elo
0.006 goals per Elo point
061.73500
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.49 goals
Neutral
-2+0.36+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.15 * Tight Race: 0.15 to 0.4 * Comfortable: 0.4 to 0.75 * Runaway: 0.75 and up.
Title-Race Openness
2.0
One-Team Race
124610
Champion Preseason Odds
69%
Rosenborg, 1st of 14
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.58/gm
Comfortable
00.250.8/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 5.07 * Some Luck: 5.07 to 7.61 * Lucky: 7.61 to 10.14 * Wild Swing: 10.14 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.47 * Close: 1.47 to 2.21 * Off: 2.21 to 2.95 * Way Off: 2.95 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
6.27 points
Some Luck
06.3416
Average Finish Error
Expected
2.29
Off
01.844
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 96.43%
98.81%
Molde
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 3.57%
10.22%
Start
050
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 14
Minimal Outliers
01.47

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.12 * Even: 0.12 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.26 * Lopsided: 0.26 and up.
Noll-Scully
How much more spread out the table was than a league where every match is a coin flip. The gold line at 1 is that coin-flip baseline. Above it, real talent gaps stretched the table; below it, the league was tighter than luck alone would produce.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1 * Moderate Separation: 1 to 1.6 * Strong Separation: 1.6 to 2.2 * Wide Separation: 2.2 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 60% * Slight Edge: 60% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 80% * Wide Edge: 80% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 82% * Strong Edge: 82% to 92% * Dominant: 92% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 30% * Some Drama: 30% to 40% * Frequent: 40% to 50% * Very Frequent: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 8% * Occasional: 8% to 14% * Frequent: 14% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.15
Even
00.120.180.260.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.40
Moderate Separation
01.003
Interquartile Edge
68%
Slight Edge
50%60%70%80%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
93%
Dominant
50%91%100%
Close Games
Expected
49%
Frequent
0%44%100%
Blowouts
Expected
26%
Very Frequent
0%33%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.1 * Slight Separation: 0.1 to 0.18 * Notable Separation: 0.18 to 0.28 * Lopsided: 0.28 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.3 * Some Carryover: 0.3 to 0.6 * Strong Carryover: 0.6 to 0.85 * Near-Lock: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 25% * As Expected: 25% to 33% * Upset-Prone: 33% to 42% * Very Upset-Prone: 42% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 15% * As Expected: 15% to 25% * Shaky Favorites: 25% to 35% * Very Shaky: 35% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.60
Predictable
00.572
Matchup Imbalance
0.38
Lopsided
00.10.180.280.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.96
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.38
Some Carryover
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
27%
As Expected
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
25%
As Expected
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.18 * Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.24 * Well Above Noise: 0.24 and up.
Probability calibration
0.60
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.64
Overconfident
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.088
Well Within Noise
00.1180.3

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
Rosenborg 100% —
Lillestrom 99.90% 0.10%
Viking 99.80% 0.20%
Start 99.01% 0.99%
Tromso 96.89% 3.11%
Bodo Glimt 95.03% 4.97%
Kongsvinger 89.01% 10.99%
Molde 82.98% 17.02%
Valerenga 81.41% 18.59%
Brann 74.53% 25.47%
Hamarkameratene 70.66% 29.34%
Stabaek 57.33% 42.67%
Hodd 44.33% 55.67%
Strindheim 9.12% 90.88%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss % Elo Δ Points
1995-04-21 Kongsvinger W 6-0 1742 1623 62.1% 19.1% 18.8% +20.1 3
1995-04-21 @ Rosenborg L 0-6 1623 1742 18.8% 19.1% 62.1% -20.1 0
1995-04-22 Molde L 0-6 1598 1468 63.2% 18.9% 17.9% -57.7 0
1995-04-22 @ Brann W 6-0 1468 1598 17.9% 18.9% 63.2% +57.7 3
1995-04-22 Tromso L 0-1 1608 1626 45.6% 20.9% 33.6% -8.2 0
1995-04-22 @ Hamarkameratene W 1-0 1626 1608 33.6% 20.9% 45.6% +8.2 3
1995-04-22 Strindheim D 1-1 1477 1458 50.6% 20.6% 28.8% -0.9 1
1995-04-22 @ Hodd D 1-1 1458 1477 28.8% 20.6% 50.6% +0.9 1
1995-04-22 Start W 3-1 1696 1701 47.4% 20.8% 31.8% +10.0 3
1995-04-22 @ Lillestrom L 1-3 1701 1696 31.8% 20.8% 47.4% -10.0 0
1995-04-22 Valerenga L 0-2 1508 1598 35.4% 20.9% 43.6% -12.7 0
1995-04-22 @ Stabaek W 2-0 1598 1508 43.6% 20.9% 35.4% +12.7 3
1995-04-22 Bodo Glimt W 6-0 1685 1588 59.9% 19.5% 20.6% +22.0 3
1995-04-22 @ Viking L 0-6 1588 1685 20.6% 19.5% 59.9% -22.0 0
1995-04-29 Viking W 5-4 1526 1707 24.4% 20.1% 55.4% +8.4 6
1995-04-29 @ Molde L 4-5 1707 1526 55.4% 20.1% 24.4% -8.4 3
1995-04-30 Lillestrom D 3-3 1566 1706 29.1% 20.6% 50.3% +0.5 1
1995-04-30 @ Bodo Glimt D 3-3 1706 1566 50.3% 20.6% 29.1% -0.5 4
1995-04-30 Brann W 1-0 1603 1540 56.0% 20.1% 23.9% +4.8 3
1995-04-30 @ Kongsvinger L 0-1 1540 1603 23.9% 20.1% 56.0% -4.8 0
1995-04-30 Stabaek W 4-1 1691 1495 69.3% 17.4% 13.2% +6.3 3
1995-04-30 @ Start L 1-4 1495 1691 13.2% 17.4% 69.3% -6.3 0
1995-04-30 Rosenborg L 0-5 1458 1762 14.2% 17.8% 67.9% -12.9 1
1995-04-30 @ Strindheim W 5-0 1762 1458 67.9% 17.8% 14.2% +12.9 6
1995-04-30 Hodd W 4-1 1635 1476 66.0% 18.3% 15.7% +7.4 6
1995-04-30 @ Tromso L 1-4 1476 1635 15.7% 18.3% 66.0% -7.4 1
1995-04-30 Hamarkameratene L 1-2 1611 1600 49.6% 20.7% 29.7% -8.4 3
1995-04-30 @ Valerenga W 2-1 1600 1611 29.7% 20.7% 49.6% +8.4 3
1995-05-03 Rosenborg D 1-1 1535 1775 19.0% 19.2% 61.8% +1.8 1
1995-05-03 @ Brann D 1-1 1775 1535 61.8% 19.2% 19.0% -1.8 7
1995-05-03 Start D 0-0 1608 1697 35.6% 20.9% 43.5% +0.3 4
1995-05-03 @ Hamarkameratene D 0-0 1697 1608 43.5% 20.9% 35.6% -0.3 4
1995-05-03 Valerenga W 3-0 1468 1603 29.8% 20.7% 49.5% +24.2 4
1995-05-03 @ Hodd L 0-3 1603 1468 49.5% 20.7% 29.8% -24.3 3
1995-05-03 Molde L 0-1 1706 1534 67.2% 18.0% 14.8% -11.6 4
1995-05-03 @ Lillestrom W 1-0 1534 1706 14.8% 18.0% 67.2% +11.6 9
1995-05-03 Bodo Glimt W 4-0 1489 1567 37.2% 21.0% 41.8% +27.5 3
1995-05-03 @ Stabaek L 0-4 1567 1489 41.8% 21.0% 37.2% -27.5 1
1995-05-03 Tromso W 1-0 1446 1642 22.9% 19.9% 57.2% +10.1 4
1995-05-03 @ Strindheim L 0-1 1642 1446 57.2% 19.9% 22.9% -10.1 6
1995-05-03 Kongsvinger D 0-0 1699 1608 59.2% 19.6% 21.1% -1.8 4
1995-05-03 @ Viking D 0-0 1608 1699 21.1% 19.6% 59.2% +1.8 4
1995-05-06 Hamarkameratene W 5-0 1539 1608 38.5% 21.0% 40.6% +33.1 4
1995-05-06 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-5 1608 1539 40.6% 21.0% 38.5% -33.1 4
1995-05-07 Strindheim W 4-1 1537 1456 58.1% 19.8% 22.1% +10.4 4
1995-05-07 @ Brann L 1-4 1456 1537 22.1% 19.8% 58.1% -10.3 4
1995-05-07 Lillestrom L 1-3 1609 1694 36.2% 20.9% 42.8% -11.2 4
1995-05-07 @ Kongsvinger W 3-1 1694 1609 42.8% 20.9% 36.2% +11.2 7
1995-05-07 Stabaek W 1-0 1546 1516 52.0% 20.5% 27.6% +5.5 12
1995-05-07 @ Molde L 0-1 1516 1546 27.6% 20.5% 52.0% -5.5 3
1995-05-07 Viking W 1-0 1773 1697 57.4% 19.9% 22.7% +4.6 10
1995-05-07 @ Rosenborg L 0-1 1697 1773 22.7% 19.9% 57.4% -4.6 4
1995-05-07 Hodd L 0-2 1697 1493 70.0% 17.2% 12.7% -22.8 4
1995-05-07 @ Start W 2-0 1493 1697 12.7% 17.2% 70.0% +22.8 7
1995-05-07 Tromso W 2-1 1579 1632 40.7% 21.0% 38.3% +6.8 6
1995-05-07 @ Valerenga L 1-2 1632 1579 38.3% 21.0% 40.7% -6.8 6
1995-05-13 Rosenborg L 1-3 1705 1777 38.0% 21.0% 41.0% -11.6 7
1995-05-13 @ Lillestrom W 3-1 1777 1705 41.0% 21.0% 38.0% +11.6 13
1995-05-14 Molde L 1-2 1575 1551 51.2% 20.5% 28.3% -8.6 4
1995-05-14 @ Hamarkameratene W 2-1 1551 1575 28.3% 20.5% 51.2% +8.6 15
1995-05-14 Bodo Glimt D 0-0 1515 1572 40.2% 21.0% 38.8% -0.1 8
1995-05-14 @ Hodd D 0-0 1572 1515 38.8% 21.0% 40.2% +0.1 5
1995-05-14 Kongsvinger D 0-0 1511 1598 35.9% 20.9% 43.2% +0.3 4
1995-05-14 @ Stabaek D 0-0 1598 1511 43.2% 20.9% 35.9% -0.3 5
1995-05-14 Valerenga L 1-2 1445 1585 29.1% 20.6% 50.3% -5.4 4
1995-05-14 @ Strindheim W 2-1 1585 1445 50.3% 20.6% 29.1% +5.4 9
1995-05-14 Start L 1-4 1625 1674 41.3% 21.0% 37.7% -17.6 6
1995-05-14 @ Tromso W 4-1 1674 1625 37.7% 21.0% 41.3% +17.6 7
1995-05-14 Brann W 2-0 1693 1547 64.8% 18.6% 16.6% +6.5 7
1995-05-14 @ Viking L 0-2 1547 1693 16.6% 18.6% 64.8% -6.4 4
1995-05-16 Tromso L 1-2 1572 1608 43.2% 20.9% 35.8% -7.4 5
1995-05-16 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1608 1572 35.8% 20.9% 43.2% +7.5 9
1995-05-16 Lillestrom D 1-1 1541 1694 27.6% 20.5% 51.9% +1.0 5
1995-05-16 @ Brann D 1-1 1694 1541 51.9% 20.5% 27.6% -1.0 8
1995-05-16 Hamarkameratene W 4-1 1598 1567 52.1% 20.5% 27.4% +12.5 8
1995-05-16 @ Kongsvinger L 1-4 1567 1598 27.4% 20.5% 52.1% -12.5 4
1995-05-16 Hodd W 7-2 1560 1515 53.8% 20.3% 25.9% +15.8 18
1995-05-16 @ Molde L 2-7 1515 1560 25.9% 20.3% 53.8% -15.8 8
1995-05-16 Stabaek W 5-2 1789 1511 75.6% 15.3% 9.1% +3.6 16
1995-05-16 @ Rosenborg L 2-5 1511 1789 9.1% 15.3% 75.6% -3.6 4
1995-05-16 Valerenga L 0-1 1692 1591 60.3% 19.5% 20.3% -10.5 7
1995-05-16 @ Start W 1-0 1591 1692 20.3% 19.5% 60.3% +10.5 12
1995-05-16 Strindheim W 2-1 1699 1440 74.3% 15.8% 9.9% +1.9 10
1995-05-16 @ Viking L 1-2 1440 1699 9.9% 15.8% 74.3% -1.9 4
1995-05-21 Rosenborg L 1-3 1554 1793 19.1% 19.2% 61.7% -6.4 4
1995-05-21 @ Hamarkameratene W 3-1 1793 1554 61.7% 19.2% 19.1% +6.4 19
1995-05-21 Kongsvinger W 3-0 1500 1610 32.8% 20.8% 46.4% +22.9 11
1995-05-21 @ Hodd L 0-3 1610 1500 46.4% 20.8% 32.8% -22.9 8
1995-05-21 Viking W 4-1 1693 1701 47.0% 20.8% 32.2% +14.4 11
1995-05-21 @ Lillestrom L 1-4 1701 1693 32.2% 20.8% 47.0% -14.4 10
1995-05-21 Brann W 3-0 1507 1542 43.4% 20.9% 35.7% +18.5 7
1995-05-21 @ Stabaek L 0-3 1542 1507 35.7% 20.9% 43.4% -18.5 5
1995-05-21 Start L 2-6 1438 1681 18.6% 19.1% 62.2% -9.7 4
1995-05-21 @ Strindheim W 6-2 1681 1438 62.2% 19.1% 18.6% +9.7 10
1995-05-21 Molde D 2-2 1615 1576 53.1% 20.4% 26.5% -0.8 10
1995-05-21 @ Tromso D 2-2 1576 1615 26.5% 20.4% 53.1% +0.8 19
1995-05-21 Bodo Glimt L 0-4 1601 1565 52.8% 20.4% 26.8% -33.5 12
1995-05-21 @ Valerenga W 4-0 1565 1601 26.8% 20.4% 52.8% +33.5 8
1995-05-28 Start L 1-2 1598 1691 35.2% 20.9% 43.9% -6.3 8
1995-05-28 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1691 1598 43.9% 20.9% 35.2% +6.3 13
1995-05-28 Hamarkameratene W 4-1 1523 1548 44.8% 20.9% 34.3% +15.1 8
1995-05-28 @ Brann L 1-4 1548 1523 34.3% 20.9% 44.8% -15.2 4
1995-05-28 Tromso D 1-1 1587 1614 44.4% 20.9% 34.7% -0.4 9
1995-05-28 @ Kongsvinger D 1-1 1614 1587 34.7% 20.9% 44.4% +0.4 11
1995-05-28 Strindheim W 3-0 1707 1428 75.6% 15.3% 9.0% +5.0 14
1995-05-28 @ Lillestrom L 0-3 1428 1707 9.0% 15.3% 75.6% -5.0 4
1995-05-28 Valerenga L 0-1 1577 1568 49.3% 20.7% 30.1% -8.8 19
1995-05-28 @ Molde W 1-0 1568 1577 30.1% 20.7% 49.3% +8.8 15
1995-05-28 Hodd W 6-1 1799 1523 75.5% 15.4% 9.1% +6.7 22
1995-05-28 @ Rosenborg L 1-6 1523 1799 9.1% 15.4% 75.5% -6.7 11
1995-05-28 Stabaek W 2-0 1687 1526 66.2% 18.3% 15.5% +6.0 13
1995-05-28 @ Viking L 0-2 1526 1687 15.5% 18.3% 66.2% -6.0 7
1995-06-02 Viking L 0-5 1533 1693 26.8% 20.4% 52.8% -23.4 4
1995-06-02 @ Hamarkameratene W 5-0 1693 1533 52.8% 20.4% 26.8% +23.4 16
1995-06-02 Brann W 1-0 1516 1538 45.1% 20.9% 34.1% +6.5 14
1995-06-02 @ Hodd L 0-1 1538 1516 34.1% 20.9% 45.1% -6.5 8
1995-06-02 Lillestrom L 0-2 1520 1712 23.4% 20.0% 56.7% -8.9 7
1995-06-02 @ Stabaek W 2-0 1712 1520 56.7% 20.0% 23.4% +8.9 17
1995-06-02 Molde L 1-3 1697 1568 63.2% 18.9% 17.9% -18.0 13
1995-06-02 @ Start W 3-1 1568 1697 17.9% 18.9% 63.2% +18.0 22
1995-06-02 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1423 1592 25.8% 20.3% 53.9% +1.1 5
1995-06-02 @ Strindheim D 1-1 1592 1423 53.9% 20.3% 25.8% -1.1 9
1995-06-02 Rosenborg L 1-2 1615 1806 23.5% 20.0% 56.5% -4.5 11
1995-06-02 @ Tromso W 2-1 1806 1615 56.5% 20.0% 23.5% +4.5 25
1995-06-02 Kongsvinger L 1-3 1577 1587 46.7% 20.8% 32.5% -13.8 15
1995-06-02 @ Valerenga W 3-1 1587 1577 32.5% 20.8% 46.7% +13.8 12
1995-06-11 Tromso W 4-2 1532 1610 37.1% 21.0% 41.9% +11.2 11
1995-06-11 @ Brann L 2-4 1610 1532 41.9% 21.0% 37.1% -11.2 11
1995-06-11 Start W 2-0 1601 1679 37.1% 21.0% 41.9% +14.5 15
1995-06-11 @ Kongsvinger L 0-2 1679 1601 41.9% 21.0% 37.1% -14.5 13
1995-06-11 Hamarkameratene D 2-2 1721 1509 70.6% 17.1% 12.3% -1.9 18
1995-06-11 @ Lillestrom D 2-2 1509 1721 12.3% 17.1% 70.6% +1.9 5
1995-06-11 Bodo Glimt L 0-3 1586 1591 47.4% 20.8% 31.8% -23.4 22
1995-06-11 @ Molde W 3-0 1591 1586 31.8% 20.8% 47.4% +23.3 12
1995-06-11 Valerenga W 3-2 1810 1563 73.4% 16.2% 10.4% +1.9 28
1995-06-11 @ Rosenborg L 2-3 1563 1810 10.4% 16.2% 73.4% -1.9 15
1995-06-11 Strindheim W 3-0 1511 1424 58.7% 19.7% 21.6% +12.0 10
1995-06-11 @ Stabaek L 0-3 1424 1511 21.6% 19.7% 58.7% -12.0 5
1995-06-11 Hodd W 3-0 1716 1522 69.1% 17.5% 13.4% +7.5 19
1995-06-11 @ Viking L 0-3 1522 1716 13.4% 17.5% 69.1% -7.5 14
1995-06-14 Tromso W 5-4 1719 1599 62.3% 19.1% 18.6% +3.3 21
1995-06-14 @ Lillestrom L 4-5 1599 1719 18.6% 19.1% 62.3% -3.3 11
1995-06-18 Kongsvinger D 2-2 1614 1615 48.0% 20.8% 31.3% -0.5 13
1995-06-18 @ Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1615 1614 31.3% 20.8% 48.0% +0.5 16
1995-06-18 Stabaek W 5-0 1511 1523 46.5% 20.8% 32.7% +27.8 8
1995-06-18 @ Hamarkameratene L 0-5 1523 1511 32.7% 20.8% 46.5% -27.8 10
1995-06-18 Lillestrom L 0-1 1515 1722 21.8% 19.8% 58.4% -4.4 14
1995-06-18 @ Hodd W 1-0 1722 1515 58.4% 19.8% 21.8% +4.4 24
1995-06-18 Rosenborg L 1-3 1665 1812 28.3% 20.5% 51.2% -9.1 13
1995-06-18 @ Start W 3-1 1812 1665 51.2% 20.5% 28.3% +9.1 31
1995-06-18 Molde L 1-3 1412 1562 27.9% 20.5% 51.5% -9.0 5
1995-06-18 @ Strindheim W 3-1 1562 1412 51.5% 20.5% 27.9% +9.0 25
1995-06-18 Viking W 1-0 1596 1724 30.6% 20.7% 48.7% +8.7 14
1995-06-18 @ Tromso L 0-1 1724 1596 48.7% 20.7% 30.6% -8.7 19
1995-06-18 Brann W 3-1 1561 1543 50.4% 20.6% 29.0% +9.3 18
1995-06-18 @ Valerenga L 1-3 1543 1561 29.0% 20.6% 50.4% -9.3 11
1995-06-25 Start L 0-4 1534 1656 31.3% 20.8% 47.9% -21.8 11
1995-06-25 @ Brann W 4-0 1656 1534 47.9% 20.8% 31.3% +21.8 16
1995-06-25 Strindheim D 0-0 1539 1403 63.8% 18.8% 17.4% -2.2 9
1995-06-25 @ Hamarkameratene D 0-0 1403 1539 17.4% 18.8% 63.8% +2.2 6
1995-06-25 Molde L 0-2 1616 1571 53.8% 20.3% 25.9% -17.9 16
1995-06-25 @ Kongsvinger W 2-0 1571 1616 25.9% 20.3% 53.8% +18.0 28
1995-06-25 Bodo Glimt D 3-3 1821 1614 70.3% 17.2% 12.6% -1.5 32
1995-06-25 @ Rosenborg D 3-3 1614 1821 12.6% 17.2% 70.3% +1.5 14
1995-06-25 Hodd W 3-1 1495 1510 46.1% 20.8% 33.1% +10.4 13
1995-06-25 @ Stabaek L 1-3 1510 1495 33.1% 20.8% 46.1% -10.4 14
1995-06-25 Valerenga W 5-0 1715 1570 64.7% 18.6% 16.7% +15.1 22
1995-06-25 @ Viking L 0-5 1570 1715 16.7% 18.6% 64.7% -15.1 18
1995-06-28 Stabaek D 2-2 1604 1506 60.0% 19.5% 20.5% -1.2 15
1995-06-28 @ Tromso D 2-2 1506 1604 20.5% 19.5% 60.0% +1.2 14
1995-07-02 Brann W 3-1 1615 1512 60.5% 19.4% 20.1% +6.7 17
1995-07-02 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-3 1512 1615 20.1% 19.4% 60.5% -6.7 11
1995-07-02 Hamarkameratene W 4-1 1500 1537 43.1% 20.9% 36.0% +15.7 17
1995-07-02 @ Hodd L 1-4 1537 1500 36.0% 20.9% 43.1% -15.7 9
1995-07-02 Rosenborg D 2-2 1589 1820 19.8% 19.4% 60.9% +1.3 29
1995-07-02 @ Molde D 2-2 1820 1589 60.9% 19.4% 19.8% -1.3 33
1995-07-02 Viking L 0-2 1678 1730 40.8% 21.0% 38.2% -14.2 16
1995-07-02 @ Start W 2-0 1730 1678 38.2% 21.0% 40.8% +14.2 25
1995-07-02 Kongsvinger L 1-3 1406 1598 23.4% 20.0% 56.7% -7.7 6
1995-07-02 @ Strindheim W 3-1 1598 1406 56.7% 20.0% 23.4% +7.7 19
1995-07-02 Lillestrom D 0-0 1555 1727 25.5% 20.3% 54.2% +1.3 19
1995-07-02 @ Valerenga D 0-0 1727 1555 54.2% 20.3% 25.5% -1.3 25
1995-07-12 Tromso L 0-2 1507 1603 34.7% 20.9% 44.4% -12.5 14
1995-07-12 @ Stabaek W 2-0 1603 1507 44.4% 20.9% 34.7% +12.5 18
1995-07-16 Bodo Glimt W 4-2 1505 1622 32.0% 20.8% 47.2% +12.4 14
1995-07-16 @ Brann L 2-4 1622 1505 47.2% 20.8% 32.0% -12.4 17
1995-07-16 Hodd W 2-1 1521 1516 48.8% 20.7% 30.5% +5.6 12
1995-07-16 @ Hamarkameratene L 1-2 1516 1521 30.5% 20.7% 48.8% -5.6 17
1995-07-16 Strindheim W 5-1 1606 1398 70.3% 17.2% 12.5% +7.7 22
1995-07-16 @ Kongsvinger L 1-5 1398 1606 12.5% 17.2% 70.3% -7.7 6
1995-07-16 Valerenga L 1-3 1726 1556 67.0% 18.1% 14.9% -19.0 25
1995-07-16 @ Lillestrom W 3-1 1556 1726 14.9% 18.1% 67.0% +19.0 22
1995-07-16 Start L 1-3 1744 1663 58.1% 19.8% 22.1% -16.7 25
1995-07-16 @ Viking W 3-1 1663 1744 22.1% 19.8% 58.1% +16.7 19
1995-07-19 Lillestrom D 0-0 1616 1707 35.4% 20.9% 43.6% +0.3 19
1995-07-19 @ Tromso D 0-0 1707 1616 43.6% 20.9% 35.4% -0.3 26
1995-07-23 Rosenborg L 1-2 1610 1818 21.7% 19.7% 58.5% -4.2 17
1995-07-23 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1818 1610 58.5% 19.7% 21.7% +4.2 36
1995-07-23 Stabaek D 1-1 1510 1494 50.2% 20.6% 29.2% -0.8 18
1995-07-23 @ Hodd D 1-1 1494 1510 29.2% 20.6% 50.2% +0.8 15
1995-07-23 Kongsvinger W 3-1 1591 1613 45.0% 20.9% 34.1% +10.6 32
1995-07-23 @ Molde L 1-3 1613 1591 34.1% 20.9% 45.0% -10.6 22
1995-07-23 Brann W 1-0 1680 1518 66.3% 18.2% 15.4% +3.2 22
1995-07-23 @ Start L 0-1 1518 1680 15.4% 18.2% 66.3% -3.2 14
1995-07-23 Hamarkameratene L 2-4 1390 1526 29.6% 20.6% 49.8% -8.5 6
1995-07-23 @ Strindheim W 4-2 1526 1390 49.8% 20.6% 29.6% +8.5 15
1995-07-23 Viking D 1-1 1575 1728 27.7% 20.5% 51.8% +1.0 23
1995-07-23 @ Valerenga D 1-1 1728 1575 51.8% 20.5% 27.7% -1.0 26
1995-07-30 Valerenga W 2-1 1515 1576 39.5% 21.0% 39.5% +6.9 17
1995-07-30 @ Brann L 1-2 1576 1515 39.5% 21.0% 39.5% -6.9 23
1995-07-30 Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1603 1605 47.7% 20.8% 31.5% -8.1 22
1995-07-30 @ Kongsvinger W 2-1 1605 1603 31.5% 20.8% 47.7% +8.1 20
1995-07-30 Hodd W 6-0 1706 1509 69.4% 17.4% 13.2% +14.1 29
1995-07-30 @ Lillestrom L 0-6 1509 1706 13.2% 17.4% 69.4% -14.2 18
1995-07-30 Strindheim W 4-1 1601 1382 71.2% 16.9% 11.9% +5.6 35
1995-07-30 @ Molde L 1-4 1382 1601 11.9% 16.9% 71.2% -5.6 6
1995-07-30 Start W 4-1 1823 1683 64.2% 18.7% 17.1% +8.1 39
1995-07-30 @ Rosenborg L 1-4 1683 1823 17.1% 18.7% 64.2% -8.1 22
1995-07-30 Hamarkameratene W 3-1 1495 1535 42.6% 20.9% 36.4% +11.2 18
1995-07-30 @ Stabaek L 1-3 1535 1495 36.4% 20.9% 42.6% -11.2 15
1995-07-30 Tromso W 3-1 1727 1616 61.3% 19.3% 19.4% +6.5 29
1995-07-30 @ Viking L 1-3 1616 1727 19.4% 19.3% 61.3% -6.5 19
1995-08-05 Viking L 0-1 1495 1733 19.1% 19.2% 61.7% -3.9 18
1995-08-05 @ Hodd W 1-0 1733 1495 61.7% 19.2% 19.1% +3.9 32
1995-08-06 Molde W 3-2 1614 1607 49.0% 20.7% 30.3% +5.3 23
1995-08-06 @ Bodo Glimt L 2-3 1607 1614 30.3% 20.7% 49.0% -5.3 35
1995-08-06 Lillestrom L 0-2 1524 1720 22.9% 19.9% 57.2% -8.7 15
1995-08-06 @ Hamarkameratene W 2-0 1720 1524 57.2% 19.9% 22.9% +8.7 32
1995-08-06 Kongsvinger W 6-2 1675 1594 58.0% 19.8% 22.2% +11.4 25
1995-08-06 @ Start L 2-6 1594 1675 22.2% 19.8% 58.0% -11.4 22
1995-08-06 Stabaek W 2-1 1376 1506 30.3% 20.7% 49.0% +8.3 9
1995-08-06 @ Strindheim L 1-2 1506 1376 49.0% 20.7% 30.3% -8.3 18
1995-08-06 Brann D 2-2 1610 1521 58.9% 19.7% 21.5% -1.1 20
1995-08-06 @ Tromso D 2-2 1521 1610 21.5% 19.7% 58.9% +1.1 18
1995-08-06 Rosenborg W 2-1 1569 1831 17.2% 18.8% 64.0% +10.5 26
1995-08-06 @ Valerenga L 1-2 1831 1569 64.0% 18.8% 17.2% -10.5 39
1995-08-18 Hamarkameratene L 0-2 1737 1515 71.5% 16.8% 11.7% -23.2 32
1995-08-18 @ Viking W 2-0 1515 1737 11.7% 16.8% 71.5% +23.2 18
1995-08-20 Strindheim W 3-2 1619 1384 72.4% 16.5% 11.1% +2.0 26
1995-08-20 @ Bodo Glimt L 2-3 1384 1619 11.1% 16.5% 72.4% -2.0 9
1995-08-20 Hodd L 1-2 1523 1491 52.1% 20.5% 27.4% -8.7 18
1995-08-20 @ Brann W 2-1 1491 1523 27.4% 20.5% 52.1% +8.7 21
1995-08-20 Valerenga D 2-2 1583 1580 48.5% 20.7% 30.8% -0.5 23
1995-08-20 @ Kongsvinger D 2-2 1580 1583 30.8% 20.7% 48.5% +0.5 27
1995-08-20 Stabaek D 2-2 1729 1498 72.1% 16.6% 11.3% -1.9 33
1995-08-20 @ Lillestrom D 2-2 1498 1729 11.3% 16.6% 72.1% +1.9 19
1995-08-20 Start W 2-1 1602 1686 36.3% 20.9% 42.8% +7.4 38
1995-08-20 @ Molde L 1-2 1686 1602 42.8% 20.9% 36.3% -7.4 25
1995-08-20 Tromso W 2-0 1820 1608 70.6% 17.1% 12.3% +4.8 42
1995-08-20 @ Rosenborg L 0-2 1608 1820 12.3% 17.1% 70.6% -4.8 20
1995-08-26 Bodo Glimt L 2-5 1679 1621 55.4% 20.1% 24.4% -19.6 25
1995-08-26 @ Start W 5-2 1621 1679 24.4% 20.1% 55.4% +19.6 29
1995-08-27 Brann L 1-3 1538 1514 51.2% 20.5% 28.2% -14.9 18
1995-08-27 @ Hamarkameratene W 3-1 1514 1538 28.2% 20.5% 51.2% +14.9 21
1995-08-27 Rosenborg L 1-4 1500 1825 12.9% 17.3% 69.8% -6.1 21
1995-08-27 @ Hodd W 4-1 1825 1500 69.8% 17.3% 12.9% +6.1 45
1995-08-27 Viking W 2-0 1500 1714 21.3% 19.7% 59.1% +19.5 22
1995-08-27 @ Stabaek L 0-2 1714 1500 59.1% 19.7% 21.3% -19.5 32
1995-08-27 Lillestrom D 1-1 1382 1727 11.8% 16.8% 71.4% +2.5 10
1995-08-27 @ Strindheim D 1-1 1727 1382 71.4% 16.8% 11.8% -2.5 34
1995-08-27 Kongsvinger W 8-0 1604 1583 50.9% 20.6% 28.6% +38.7 23
1995-08-27 @ Tromso L 0-8 1583 1604 28.6% 20.6% 50.9% -38.7 23
1995-08-27 Molde D 2-2 1580 1609 44.2% 20.9% 34.9% -0.3 28
1995-08-27 @ Valerenga D 2-2 1609 1580 34.9% 20.9% 44.2% +0.3 39
1995-09-02 Valerenga D 2-2 1640 1580 55.7% 20.1% 24.2% -1.0 30
1995-09-02 @ Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1580 1640 24.2% 20.1% 55.7% +0.9 29
1995-09-02 Stabaek W 1-0 1529 1520 49.3% 20.7% 30.0% +5.9 24
1995-09-02 @ Brann L 0-1 1520 1529 30.0% 20.7% 49.3% -5.9 22
1995-09-02 Hodd W 2-1 1544 1494 54.4% 20.2% 25.3% +4.8 26
1995-09-02 @ Kongsvinger L 1-2 1494 1544 25.3% 20.2% 54.4% -4.8 21
1995-09-02 Tromso L 0-7 1609 1642 43.6% 20.9% 35.5% -48.2 39
1995-09-02 @ Molde W 7-0 1642 1609 35.5% 20.9% 43.6% +48.2 26
1995-09-02 Hamarkameratene W 9-1 1831 1523 77.6% 14.5% 7.9% +8.8 48
1995-09-02 @ Rosenborg L 1-9 1523 1831 7.9% 14.5% 77.6% -8.8 18
1995-09-02 Strindheim L 4-6 1659 1385 75.3% 15.4% 9.2% -17.1 25
1995-09-02 @ Start W 6-4 1385 1659 9.2% 15.4% 75.3% +17.1 13
1995-09-02 Lillestrom W 3-1 1694 1725 44.0% 20.9% 35.1% +10.9 35
1995-09-02 @ Viking L 1-3 1725 1694 35.1% 20.9% 44.0% -10.9 34
1995-09-08 Viking W 5-3 1402 1705 14.2% 17.8% 67.9% +16.2 16
1995-09-08 @ Strindheim L 3-5 1705 1402 67.9% 17.8% 14.2% -16.2 35
1995-09-09 Brann L 1-3 1714 1535 67.8% 17.9% 14.3% -19.2 34
1995-09-09 @ Lillestrom W 3-1 1535 1714 14.3% 17.9% 67.8% +19.2 27
1995-09-09 Bodo Glimt L 0-4 1691 1639 54.6% 20.2% 25.2% -34.5 26
1995-09-09 @ Tromso W 4-0 1639 1691 25.2% 20.2% 54.6% +34.5 33
1995-09-10 Kongsvinger W 2-1 1514 1549 43.4% 20.9% 35.6% +6.4 21
1995-09-10 @ Hamarkameratene L 1-2 1549 1514 35.6% 20.9% 43.4% -6.4 26
1995-09-10 Molde D 2-2 1489 1561 38.0% 21.0% 41.0% +0.1 22
1995-09-10 @ Hodd D 2-2 1561 1489 41.0% 21.0% 38.0% -0.1 40
1995-09-10 Rosenborg W 2-1 1514 1840 12.8% 17.3% 69.9% +11.4 25
1995-09-10 @ Stabaek L 1-2 1840 1514 69.9% 17.3% 12.8% -11.4 48
1995-09-10 Start W 4-1 1581 1642 39.6% 21.0% 39.4% +16.9 32
1995-09-10 @ Valerenga L 1-4 1642 1581 39.4% 21.0% 39.6% -16.9 25
1995-09-23 Lillestrom W 2-1 1828 1695 63.6% 18.9% 17.5% +3.4 51
1995-09-23 @ Rosenborg L 1-2 1695 1828 17.5% 18.9% 63.6% -3.4 34
1995-09-24 Hodd W 4-0 1674 1489 68.3% 17.7% 13.9% +10.2 36
1995-09-24 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-4 1489 1674 13.9% 17.7% 68.3% -10.2 22
1995-09-24 Stabaek D 0-0 1542 1525 50.3% 20.6% 29.1% -1.0 27
1995-09-24 @ Kongsvinger D 0-0 1525 1542 29.1% 20.6% 50.3% +0.9 26
1995-09-24 Hamarkameratene W 3-2 1561 1521 53.3% 20.4% 26.4% +4.7 43
1995-09-24 @ Molde L 2-3 1521 1561 26.4% 20.4% 53.3% -4.7 21
1995-09-24 Tromso W 2-1 1625 1656 43.9% 20.9% 35.2% +6.3 28
1995-09-24 @ Start L 1-2 1656 1625 35.2% 20.9% 43.9% -6.3 26
1995-09-24 Strindheim W 9-2 1598 1418 67.9% 17.8% 14.2% +12.0 35
1995-09-24 @ Valerenga L 2-9 1418 1598 14.2% 17.8% 67.9% -12.0 16
1995-09-30 Rosenborg D 2-2 1689 1832 28.8% 20.6% 50.6% +0.7 36
1995-09-30 @ Viking D 2-2 1832 1689 50.6% 20.6% 28.8% -0.6 52
1995-10-01 Bodo Glimt L 0-6 1516 1684 25.9% 20.3% 53.8% -27.0 21
1995-10-01 @ Hamarkameratene W 6-0 1684 1516 53.8% 20.3% 25.9% +27.0 39
1995-10-01 Start W 2-1 1479 1632 27.6% 20.5% 51.9% +8.7 25
1995-10-01 @ Hodd L 1-2 1632 1479 51.9% 20.5% 27.6% -8.7 28
1995-10-01 Kongsvinger W 3-1 1691 1541 65.2% 18.5% 16.3% +5.5 37
1995-10-01 @ Lillestrom L 1-3 1541 1691 16.3% 18.5% 65.2% -5.5 27
1995-10-01 Molde W 3-1 1526 1566 42.7% 20.9% 36.4% +11.2 29
1995-10-01 @ Stabaek L 1-3 1566 1526 36.4% 20.9% 42.7% -11.2 43
1995-10-01 Brann D 2-2 1406 1554 28.2% 20.5% 51.2% +0.7 17
1995-10-01 @ Strindheim D 2-2 1554 1406 51.2% 20.5% 28.2% -0.7 28
1995-10-01 Valerenga W 2-1 1650 1610 53.2% 20.4% 26.4% +5.0 29
1995-10-01 @ Tromso L 1-2 1610 1650 26.4% 20.4% 53.2% -5.0 35
1995-10-04 Molde W 2-0 1831 1554 75.5% 15.4% 9.1% +3.5 55
1995-10-04 @ Rosenborg L 0-2 1554 1831 9.1% 15.4% 75.5% -3.5 43
1995-10-04 Viking W 2-1 1553 1690 29.5% 20.6% 49.8% +8.4 31
1995-10-04 @ Brann L 1-2 1690 1553 49.8% 20.6% 29.5% -8.4 36
1995-10-07 Lillestrom L 1-2 1551 1697 28.5% 20.6% 51.0% -5.3 43
1995-10-07 @ Molde W 2-1 1697 1551 51.0% 20.6% 28.5% +5.3 40
1995-10-08 Stabaek L 0-1 1711 1537 67.4% 18.0% 14.6% -11.7 39
1995-10-08 @ Bodo Glimt W 1-0 1537 1711 14.6% 18.0% 67.4% +11.7 32
1995-10-08 Viking L 3-4 1536 1681 28.5% 20.6% 51.0% -4.9 27
1995-10-08 @ Kongsvinger W 4-3 1681 1536 51.0% 20.6% 28.5% +4.9 39
1995-10-08 Brann W 3-1 1835 1562 75.2% 15.5% 9.3% +3.0 58
1995-10-08 @ Rosenborg L 1-3 1562 1835 9.3% 15.5% 75.2% -3.0 31
1995-10-08 Hamarkameratene L 1-2 1623 1489 63.6% 18.9% 17.5% -10.5 28
1995-10-08 @ Start W 2-1 1489 1623 17.5% 18.9% 63.6% +10.5 24
1995-10-08 Strindheim W 1-0 1655 1407 73.4% 16.2% 10.4% +2.1 32
1995-10-08 @ Tromso L 0-1 1407 1655 10.4% 16.2% 73.4% -2.1 17
1995-10-08 Hodd W 3-2 1605 1488 62.0% 19.2% 18.9% +3.5 38
1995-10-08 @ Valerenga L 2-3 1488 1605 18.9% 19.2% 62.0% -3.4 25
1995-10-15 Kongsvinger D 1-1 1558 1531 51.7% 20.5% 27.8% -1.0 32
1995-10-15 @ Brann D 1-1 1531 1558 27.8% 20.5% 51.7% +1.0 28
1995-10-15 Valerenga W 1-0 1500 1609 33.0% 20.8% 46.2% +8.3 27
1995-10-15 @ Hamarkameratene L 0-1 1609 1500 46.2% 20.8% 33.0% -8.3 38
1995-10-15 Tromso L 2-3 1484 1657 25.4% 20.3% 54.4% -4.5 25
1995-10-15 @ Hodd W 3-2 1657 1484 54.4% 20.3% 25.4% +4.5 35
1995-10-15 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1702 1700 48.4% 20.7% 30.9% -0.7 41
1995-10-15 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1700 1702 30.9% 20.7% 48.4% +0.7 40
1995-10-15 Strindheim W 2-1 1838 1405 84.5% 11.2% 4.3% +0.8 61
1995-10-15 @ Rosenborg L 1-2 1405 1838 4.3% 11.2% 84.5% -0.8 17
1995-10-15 Start L 1-3 1549 1613 39.2% 21.0% 39.8% -11.9 32
1995-10-15 @ Stabaek W 3-1 1613 1549 39.8% 21.0% 39.2% +11.9 31
1995-10-15 Molde D 2-2 1686 1546 64.3% 18.7% 17.0% -1.5 40
1995-10-15 @ Viking D 2-2 1546 1686 17.0% 18.7% 64.3% +1.5 44
1995-10-22 Viking W 6-2 1700 1685 50.1% 20.6% 29.2% +14.5 43
1995-10-22 @ Bodo Glimt L 2-6 1685 1700 29.2% 20.6% 50.1% -14.5 40
1995-10-22 Rosenborg D 1-1 1532 1838 14.0% 17.8% 68.2% +2.3 29
1995-10-22 @ Kongsvinger D 1-1 1838 1532 68.2% 17.8% 14.0% -2.3 62
1995-10-22 Brann W 4-2 1547 1558 46.7% 20.8% 32.5% +9.1 47
1995-10-22 @ Molde L 2-4 1558 1547 32.5% 20.8% 46.7% -9.1 32
1995-10-22 Lillestrom W 2-1 1624 1701 37.4% 21.0% 41.7% +7.2 34
1995-10-22 @ Start L 1-2 1701 1624 41.7% 21.0% 37.4% -7.2 41
1995-10-22 Hodd L 1-5 1404 1480 37.5% 21.0% 41.5% -21.0 17
1995-10-22 @ Strindheim W 5-1 1480 1404 41.5% 21.0% 37.5% +21.0 28
1995-10-22 Hamarkameratene W 4-1 1661 1508 65.5% 18.4% 16.0% +7.6 38
1995-10-22 @ Tromso L 1-4 1508 1661 16.0% 18.4% 65.5% -7.6 27
1995-10-22 Stabaek D 2-2 1600 1537 56.0% 20.1% 23.9% -1.0 39
1995-10-22 @ Valerenga D 2-2 1537 1600 23.9% 20.1% 56.0% +1.0 33

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1995-09-02 9.21% Strindheim 1385 6 @ Start 1659 4
2 1995-08-18 11.74% Hamarkameratene 1515 2 @ Viking 1737 0
3 1995-05-07 12.72% Hodd 1493 2 @ Start 1697 0
4 1995-09-10 12.84% @ Stabaek 1514 2 Rosenborg 1840 1
5 1995-09-08 14.25% @ Strindheim 1402 5 Viking 1705 3
6 1995-09-09 14.29% Brann 1535 3 @ Lillestrom 1714 1
7 1995-10-08 14.63% Stabaek 1537 1 @ Bodo Glimt 1711 0
8 1995-05-03 14.79% Molde 1534 1 @ Lillestrom 1706 0
9 1995-07-16 14.94% Valerenga 1556 3 @ Lillestrom 1726 1
10 1995-08-06 17.22% @ Valerenga 1569 2 Rosenborg 1831 1
11 1995-10-08 17.51% Hamarkameratene 1489 2 @ Start 1623 1
12 1995-06-02 17.86% Molde 1568 3 @ Start 1697 1
13 1995-04-22 17.88% Molde 1468 6 @ Brann 1598 0
14 1995-05-16 20.26% Valerenga 1591 1 @ Start 1692 0
15 1995-08-27 21.26% @ Stabaek 1500 2 Viking 1714 0
16 1995-07-16 22.14% Start 1663 3 @ Viking 1744 1
17 1995-05-03 22.91% @ Strindheim 1446 1 Tromso 1642 0
18 1995-08-26 24.44% Bodo Glimt 1621 5 @ Start 1679 2
19 1995-04-29 24.45% @ Molde 1526 5 Viking 1707 4
20 1995-09-09 25.18% Bodo Glimt 1639 4 @ Tromso 1691 0
21 1995-06-25 25.92% Molde 1571 2 @ Kongsvinger 1616 0
22 1995-05-21 26.81% Bodo Glimt 1565 4 @ Valerenga 1601 0
23 1995-08-20 27.38% Hodd 1491 2 @ Brann 1523 1
24 1995-10-01 27.62% @ Hodd 1479 2 Start 1632 1
25 1995-08-27 28.21% Brann 1514 3 @ Hamarkameratene 1538 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1995-04-22 57.70 Molde 6 1468 17.88% @ Brann 0 1598 63.18% 18.94%
2 1995-09-02 48.16 Tromso 7 1642 35.51% @ Molde 0 1609 43.57% 20.93%
3 1995-08-27 38.72 @ Tromso 8 1604 50.86% Kongsvinger 0 1583 28.57% 20.57%
4 1995-09-09 34.51 Bodo Glimt 4 1639 25.18% @ Tromso 0 1691 54.58% 20.23%
5 1995-05-21 33.49 Bodo Glimt 4 1565 26.81% @ Valerenga 0 1601 52.78% 20.41%
6 1995-05-06 33.06 @ Bodo Glimt 5 1539 38.46% Hamarkameratene 0 1608 40.57% 20.97%
7 1995-06-18 27.78 @ Hamarkameratene 5 1511 46.48% Stabaek 0 1523 32.69% 20.83%
8 1995-05-03 27.50 @ Stabaek 4 1489 37.20% Bodo Glimt 0 1567 41.84% 20.96%
9 1995-10-01 27.03 Bodo Glimt 6 1684 53.80% @ Hamarkameratene 0 1516 25.89% 20.31%
10 1995-05-03 24.26 @ Hodd 3 1468 29.80% Valerenga 0 1603 49.54% 20.66%
11 1995-06-02 23.45 Viking 5 1693 52.81% @ Hamarkameratene 0 1533 26.78% 20.41%
12 1995-06-11 23.36 Bodo Glimt 3 1591 31.81% @ Molde 0 1586 47.41% 20.78%
13 1995-08-18 23.17 Hamarkameratene 2 1515 11.74% @ Viking 0 1737 71.45% 16.82%
14 1995-05-21 22.93 @ Hodd 3 1500 32.78% Kongsvinger 0 1610 46.39% 20.83%
15 1995-05-07 22.77 Hodd 2 1493 12.72% @ Start 0 1697 70.02% 17.25%
16 1995-04-22 21.99 @ Viking 6 1685 59.85% Bodo Glimt 0 1588 20.61% 19.53%
17 1995-06-25 21.76 Start 4 1656 47.90% @ Brann 0 1534 31.34% 20.76%
18 1995-10-22 21.03 Hodd 5 1480 41.48% @ Strindheim 1 1404 37.55% 20.96%
19 1995-04-21 20.11 @ Rosenborg 6 1742 62.11% Kongsvinger 0 1623 18.75% 19.15%
20 1995-08-26 19.56 Bodo Glimt 5 1621 24.44% @ Start 2 1679 55.42% 20.14%
21 1995-08-27 19.54 @ Stabaek 2 1500 21.26% Viking 0 1714 59.09% 19.65%
22 1995-09-09 19.19 Brann 3 1535 14.29% @ Lillestrom 1 1714 67.85% 17.86%
23 1995-07-16 18.96 Valerenga 3 1556 14.94% @ Lillestrom 1 1726 66.97% 18.09%
24 1995-05-21 18.52 @ Stabaek 3 1507 43.41% Brann 0 1542 35.66% 20.93%
25 1995-06-02 18.00 Molde 3 1568 17.86% @ Start 1 1697 63.21% 18.93%