1995 Tippeligaen Season

182 games · 100,000 simulations

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

62 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Molde

13.77 points above expected

47 points · 33.23 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Start

8.02 points below expected

34 points · 42.02 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Rosenborg	26	19	5	2	62	78	29	+49	55.4	+6.65
2	Molde	26	14	5	7	47	60	47	+13	33.2	+13.77
3	Bodo Glimt	26	12	7	7	43	65	43	+22	38.3	+4.73
4	Lillestrom	26	11	8	7	41	50	36	+14	47.3	-6.30
5	Viking	26	12	4	10	40	55	42	+13	46.5	-6.51
6	Valerenga	26	11	6	9	39	47	44	+3	33.0	+6.00
7	Tromso	26	11	5	10	38	53	42	+11	39.0	-1.03
8	Start	26	11	1	14	34	51	52	-1	42.0	-8.02
9	Stabaek	26	9	6	11	33	36	40	-4	28.4	+4.60
10	Brann	26	9	5	12	32	40	50	-10	31.9	+0.07
11	Kongsvinger	26	7	8	11	29	37	54	-17	35.6	-6.62
12	Hodd	26	8	4	14	28	38	57	-19	26.4	+1.55
13	Hamarkameratene	26	8	3	15	27	33	66	-33	31.3	-4.31
14	Strindheim	26	4	5	17	17	36	77	-41	19.5	-2.48

Form

Each team's 5-game rolling points-per-game across the season. Hot streaks push above the dashed 1.5 PPG reference line; cold spells drop below. Each team gets a distinct color; the legend below the plot lets you read off which line is which. (First 4 games of each team have no rolling window, so the lines start at game 5.)

League Race

Cumulative points across the season for each team. Highlighted teams are drawn in color (top finishers for the Title Race, bottom finishers for the Relegation Race); the rest of the league appears in light gray as context. Switch views with the buttons below.

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Rosenborg	1825	62	55.35	+6.65	88.0%	29	45	51	56	59	65	76
Bodo Glimt	1715	43	38.27	+4.73	78.8%	15	28	34	38	43	49	61
Lillestrom	1689	41	47.30	-6.30	18.9%	20	37	43	47	52	58	69
Tromso	1668	38	39.03	-1.03	47.1%	18	29	35	39	43	50	63
Viking	1666	40	46.51	-6.51	17.6%	24	36	42	47	51	57	71
Start	1628	34	42.02	-8.02	12.9%	18	31	38	42	47	53	70
Valerenga	1602	39	33.00	+6.00	75.5%	8	22	29	33	37	44	63
Molde	1561	47	33.23	+13.77	98.7%	11	23	29	33	38	44	55
Brann	1554	32	31.93	+0.07	54.1%	10	22	28	32	36	43	57
Kongsvinger	1540	29	35.62	-6.62	17.0%	12	25	31	36	40	46	58
Stabaek	1538	33	28.40	+4.60	78.9%	7	18	24	28	33	39	51
Hamarkameratene	1505	27	31.31	-4.31	27.7%	9	21	27	31	36	42	57
Hodd	1501	28	26.45	+1.55	64.3%	5	16	22	26	31	37	49
Strindheim	1386	17	19.48	-2.48	38.2%	3	10	15	19	23	29	45

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Team	BG	BRA	HAM	HOD	KON	LIL	MOL	ROS	STA	STA	STR	TRO	VAL	VIK
Bodo Glimt	—	1-0-1 3.60	2-0-0 3.19	1-1-0 3.66	1-1-0 2.81	0-2-0 2.30	2-0-0 2.85	0-1-1 1.50	0-0-2 3.71	1-0-1 2.31	1-1-0 4.22	1-0-1 2.51	1-1-0 2.89	1-0-1 2.62
Brann	1-0-1 1.98	—	2-0-0 2.63	0-0-2 3.06	0-1-1 2.69	1-1-0 1.73	0-0-2 3.26	0-1-1 1.29	1-0-1 3.01	0-0-2 1.90	1-1-0 3.73	1-1-0 2.21	1-0-1 2.49	1-0-1 1.88
Hamarkameratene	0-0-2 2.37	0-0-2 2.94	—	1-0-1 2.99	1-0-1 2.53	0-1-1 1.50	0-0-2 2.72	0-0-2 1.22	1-0-1 2.92	1-1-0 2.08	1-1-0 3.82	0-0-2 2.26	2-0-0 2.29	1-0-1 1.61
Hodd	0-1-1 1.96	2-0-0 2.51	1-0-1 2.57	—	1-0-1 2.11	0-0-2 1.46	0-1-1 2.28	0-0-2 1.03	0-1-1 2.88	2-0-0 1.63	1-1-0 3.17	0-0-2 1.62	1-0-1 1.84	0-0-2 1.39
Kongsvinger	0-1-1 2.75	1-1-0 2.89	1-0-1 3.04	1-0-1 3.46	—	0-0-2 2.05	0-0-2 3.03	0-1-1 1.45	0-2-0 3.24	1-0-1 2.28	2-0-0 4.22	0-1-1 2.62	1-1-0 2.83	0-1-1 1.98
Lillestrom	0-2-0 3.26	0-1-1 3.88	1-1-0 4.14	2-0-0 4.18	2-0-0 3.55	—	1-0-1 3.85	0-0-2 2.10	1-1-0 4.20	1-0-1 3.09	1-1-0 4.76	1-1-0 3.50	0-1-1 3.94	1-0-1 2.88
Molde	0-0-2 2.71	2-0-0 2.33	2-0-0 2.85	1-1-0 3.29	2-0-0 2.54	1-0-1 1.76	—	0-1-1 1.28	1-0-1 3.09	2-0-0 2.11	2-0-0 4.10	0-1-1 2.53	0-1-1 2.92	1-1-0 1.73
Rosenborg	1-1-0 4.14	1-1-0 4.39	2-0-0 4.47	2-0-0 4.69	1-1-0 4.18	2-0-0 3.49	1-1-0 4.39	—	1-0-1 4.69	2-0-0 3.82	2-0-0 4.91	2-0-0 4.12	1-0-1 4.41	1-1-0 3.61
Stabaek	2-0-0 1.90	1-0-1 2.55	1-0-1 2.63	1-1-0 2.68	0-2-0 2.32	0-1-1 1.45	1-0-1 2.48	1-0-1 1.03	—	0-0-2 2.00	1-0-1 3.63	0-1-1 2.06	0-1-1 2.16	1-0-1 1.54
Start	1-0-1 3.25	2-0-0 3.70	0-1-1 3.51	0-0-2 3.99	1-0-1 3.29	1-0-1 2.46	0-0-2 3.48	0-0-2 1.78	2-0-0 3.61	—	1-0-1 4.47	2-0-0 2.78	0-0-2 3.29	1-0-1 2.30
Strindheim	0-1-1 1.44	0-1-1 1.86	0-1-1 1.78	0-1-1 2.39	0-0-2 1.43	0-1-1 0.97	0-0-2 1.54	0-0-2 0.86	1-0-1 1.96	1-0-1 1.22	—	1-0-1 1.35	0-0-2 1.65	1-0-1 1.09
Tromso	1-0-1 3.06	0-1-1 3.36	2-0-0 3.35	2-0-0 4.00	1-1-0 2.94	0-1-1 2.08	1-1-0 3.04	0-0-2 1.52	1-1-0 3.53	0-0-2 2.77	1-0-1 4.31	—	1-0-1 3.12	1-0-1 1.97
Valerenga	0-1-1 2.69	1-0-1 3.07	0-0-2 3.27	1-0-1 3.76	0-1-1 2.73	1-1-0 1.68	1-1-0 2.64	1-0-1 1.26	1-1-0 3.41	2-0-0 2.29	2-0-0 3.97	1-0-1 2.45	—	0-1-1 1.81
Viking	1-0-1 2.96	1-0-1 3.72	1-0-1 4.02	2-0-0 4.26	1-1-0 3.60	1-0-1 2.68	0-1-1 3.88	0-1-1 1.97	1-0-1 4.08	1-0-1 3.28	1-0-1 4.61	1-0-1 3.62	1-1-0 3.79	—

Goal Differential vs Points

Each team plotted by their final goal differential (x) and final point total (y). Teams above the broad trend (more points than their GD would suggest) were efficient at narrow wins; teams below took more lopsided losses than their results imply.

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	4.40%	4.67%	3.85%	1.92%	1.37%	3.30%	19.51%
1	4.67%	6.04%	7.69%	6.59%	3.57%	1.10%	29.67%
2	3.85%	7.69%	8.24%	1.65%	1.10%	1.92%	24.45%
3	1.92%	6.59%	1.65%	1.10%	0.27%	0.27%	11.81%
4	1.37%	3.57%	1.10%	0.27%	—	0.82%	7.14%
5+	3.30%	1.10%	1.92%	0.27%	0.82%	—	7.42%
Total	19.51%	29.67%	24.45%	11.81%	7.14%	7.42%	100%

Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.87
Mean allowed	1.87
StdDev scored	1.65
StdDev allowed	1.65
Mean total goals/game	3.73
Correlation (home vs away score)	-0.174
Sample size (games)	182

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	15.38%
1	—	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	—	19.23%
2	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
3	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	23.08%
4	11.54%	—	—	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
Total	26.92%	19.23%	34.62%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	100%

Bodo Glimt — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	2.50
Mean allowed	1.65
StdDev scored	1.82
StdDev allowed	1.50
Mean total goals/game	4.15
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.390
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	26.92%
1	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	30.77%
2	—	7.69%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	19.23%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	3.85%	46.15%	23.08%	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	100%

Brann — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.54
Mean allowed	1.92
StdDev scored	1.39
StdDev allowed	1.32
Mean total goals/game	3.46
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.280
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	11.54%	26.92%
1	3.85%	—	3.85%	11.54%	15.38%	3.85%	38.46%
2	3.85%	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	26.92%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	19.23%	19.23%	15.38%	15.38%	15.38%	15.38%	100%

Hamarkameratene — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.27
Mean allowed	2.54
StdDev scored	1.22
StdDev allowed	2.20
Mean total goals/game	3.81
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.326
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	23.08%
1	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	34.62%
2	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	26.92%
3	7.69%	—	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	19.23%	30.77%	11.54%	15.38%	11.54%	11.54%	100%

Hodd — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.46
Mean allowed	2.19
StdDev scored	1.27
StdDev allowed	2.00
Mean total goals/game	3.65
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.272
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	7.69%	26.92%
1	3.85%	11.54%	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	34.62%
2	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	19.23%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	19.23%	30.77%	19.23%	15.38%	3.85%	11.54%	100%

Kongsvinger — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.42
Mean allowed	2.08
StdDev scored	1.33
StdDev allowed	2.04
Mean total goals/game	3.50
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.175
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
1	3.85%	11.54%	7.69%	15.38%	—	—	38.46%
2	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	19.23%
3	3.85%	11.54%	—	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%	—	7.69%
Total	26.92%	34.62%	15.38%	19.23%	3.85%	—	100%

Lillestrom — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.92
Mean allowed	1.38
StdDev scored	1.49
StdDev allowed	1.20
Mean total goals/game	3.31
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	0.039
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	15.38%
1	7.69%	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	15.38%
2	3.85%	7.69%	19.23%	3.85%	—	—	34.62%
3	—	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
4	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	11.54%
Total	15.38%	26.92%	38.46%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Molde — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	2.31
Mean allowed	1.81
StdDev scored	1.78
StdDev allowed	1.47
Mean total goals/game	4.12
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.190
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
1	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	19.23%
2	7.69%	15.38%	7.69%	—	—	—	30.77%
3	—	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	19.23%
Total	19.23%	53.85%	23.08%	3.85%	—	—	100%

Rosenborg — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	3.00
Mean allowed	1.12
StdDev scored	1.92
StdDev allowed	0.77
Mean total goals/game	4.12
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.136
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	7.69%	15.38%	—	—	3.85%	34.62%
1	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	19.23%
2	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	3.85%	23.08%
3	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	—	—	19.23%
4	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	26.92%	26.92%	30.77%	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	100%

Stabaek — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.38
Mean allowed	1.54
StdDev scored	1.27
StdDev allowed	1.45
Mean total goals/game	2.92
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.270
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	—	19.23%
1	3.85%	—	11.54%	11.54%	7.69%	—	34.62%
2	—	11.54%	—	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
5+	—	—	7.69%	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	11.54%	30.77%	30.77%	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	100%

Start — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.96
Mean allowed	2.00
StdDev scored	1.78
StdDev allowed	1.50
Mean total goals/game	3.96
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.015
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	—	7.69%	—	3.85%	19.23%
1	3.85%	11.54%	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	7.69%	50.00%
2	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	23.08%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	7.69%
Total	7.69%	19.23%	15.38%	23.08%	15.38%	19.23%	100%

Strindheim — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.38
Mean allowed	2.96
StdDev scored	1.39
StdDev allowed	2.03
Mean total goals/game	4.35
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	0.218
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
1	11.54%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	34.62%
2	3.85%	7.69%	11.54%	—	3.85%	—	26.92%
3	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	11.54%
5+	7.69%	—	—	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	26.92%	23.08%	30.77%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	100%

Tromso — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	2.04
Mean allowed	1.62
StdDev scored	1.99
StdDev allowed	1.44
Mean total goals/game	3.65
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.190
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	19.23%
1	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	26.92%
2	3.85%	11.54%	15.38%	3.85%	—	—	34.62%
3	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	15.38%	30.77%	34.62%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Valerenga — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	1.81
Mean allowed	1.69
StdDev scored	1.81
StdDev allowed	1.23
Mean total goals/game	3.50
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.136
Games played	26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	19.23%
1	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	19.23%
2	11.54%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	26.92%
3	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
4	—	—	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	7.69%
5+	11.54%	—	—	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	34.62%	23.08%	19.23%	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	100%

Viking — Summary Statistics

Mean scored	2.12
Mean allowed	1.62
StdDev scored	1.68
StdDev allowed	1.77
Mean total goals/game	3.73
Correlation (scored vs allowed)	-0.052
Games played	26

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Molde	47	33.2	+13.77
2	Rosenborg	62	55.4	+6.65
3	Valerenga	39	33.0	+6.00
4	Bodo Glimt	43	38.3	+4.73
5	Stabaek	33	28.4	+4.60

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Start	34	42.0	-8.02
2	Kongsvinger	29	35.6	-6.62
3	Viking	40	46.5	-6.51
4	Lillestrom	41	47.3	-6.30
5	Hamarkameratene	27	31.3	-4.31

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts W or D consecutively; Winless counts L or D consecutively.

Longest Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Molde	6	Apr 22 – May 16	1 in 1,608
2	Rosenborg	8	May 7 – Jun 18	1 in 63
3	Strindheim	2	Sep 2 – Sep 8	1 in 63
4	Brann	3	Aug 27 – Sep 9	1 in 46
5	Bodo Glimt	4	Jul 30 – Aug 26	1 in 34

Longest Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Start	4	Aug 20 – Sep 10	1 in 253
2	Hamarkameratene	6	May 6 – Jun 2	1 in 135
3	Viking	2	Aug 18 – Aug 27	1 in 34
4	Tromso	3	May 3 – May 14	1 in 31
5	Lillestrom	3	Sep 2 – Sep 23	1 in 23

Longest Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Molde	7	Apr 22 – May 21	1 in 131
2	Strindheim	3	Aug 27 – Sep 8	1 in 50
3	Stabaek	4	Sep 10 – Oct 8	1 in 33
4	Valerenga	6	Aug 6 – Sep 24	1 in 32
5	Rosenborg	15	Apr 21 – Jul 30	1 in 31

Longest Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Lillestrom	5	Aug 20 – Sep 23	1 in 77
2	Start	4	Aug 20 – Sep 10	1 in 25
3	Hamarkameratene	8	May 3 – Jun 11	1 in 22
4	Strindheim	13	May 7 – Jul 30	1 in 18
5	Kongsvinger	6	Sep 10 – Oct 22	1 in 9

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Finish Position Heatmap

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Rosenborg	68.95%	19.06%	7.09%	2.94%	1.12%	0.49%	0.16%	0.10%	0.04%	0.03%	0.02%	—	—	—
Molde	0.17%	0.99%	2.90%	4.82%	6.93%	9.50%	11.41%	12.16%	12.52%	11.69%	10.40%	8.82%	5.73%	1.96%
Bodo Glimt	1.17%	5.19%	9.00%	13.21%	14.03%	13.12%	11.57%	10.32%	7.55%	6.10%	4.29%	2.64%	1.42%	0.39%
Lillestrom	13.34%	29.13%	22.44%	13.70%	9.09%	5.16%	3.34%	1.87%	1.07%	0.51%	0.21%	0.09%	0.03%	0.02%
Viking	11.14%	24.96%	23.26%	15.75%	10.06%	5.83%	3.80%	2.37%	1.29%	0.83%	0.39%	0.27%	0.04%	0.01%
Valerenga	0.17%	0.73%	2.32%	4.40%	6.97%	9.05%	10.80%	11.51%	12.35%	12.83%	10.79%	9.47%	6.31%	2.30%
Tromso	1.26%	5.78%	9.63%	13.16%	15.08%	14.39%	11.55%	9.49%	7.52%	4.94%	3.79%	2.05%	1.15%	0.21%
Start	3.19%	10.81%	15.79%	17.29%	15.13%	11.88%	8.18%	6.72%	4.66%	2.88%	1.96%	0.96%	0.47%	0.08%
Stabaek	0.03%	0.16%	0.54%	1.07%	2.13%	3.82%	5.66%	6.79%	9.22%	12.17%	14.63%	17.80%	17.63%	8.35%
Brann	0.12%	0.72%	1.50%	2.94%	4.72%	6.72%	9.90%	10.59%	12.64%	13.47%	13.27%	12.03%	8.36%	3.02%
Kongsvinger	0.39%	1.92%	3.85%	7.54%	9.65%	12.10%	12.18%	12.41%	11.58%	9.43%	8.55%	5.77%	3.70%	0.93%
Hodd	—	0.09%	0.25%	0.63%	1.15%	2.05%	3.01%	4.97%	6.52%	9.76%	13.51%	18.63%	24.81%	14.62%
Hamarkameratene	0.07%	0.46%	1.42%	2.54%	3.87%	5.70%	8.10%	10.17%	11.90%	13.06%	13.89%	13.49%	11.24%	4.09%
Strindheim	—	—	0.01%	0.01%	0.07%	0.19%	0.34%	0.53%	1.14%	2.30%	4.30%	7.98%	19.11%	64.02%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Points Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

No Trend Data Yet

Season Trends will appear here once midseason progression snapshots are available for this season.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team	Same level	Direct relegation
Rosenborg	100%	—
Lillestrom	99.9%	0.1%
Viking	99.7%	0.3%
Start	98.5%	1.5%
Tromso	96.6%	3.4%
Bodo Glimt	95.5%	4.5%
Kongsvinger	89.6%	10.4%
Molde	83.5%	16.5%
Valerenga	81.9%	18.1%
Brann	76.6%	23.4%
Hamarkameratene	71.2%	28.8%
Stabaek	56.2%	43.8%
Hodd	41.9%	58.1%
Strindheim	8.9%	91.1%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Every regular-season game from each team's perspective. Use the team filter at the top of the tab; the table scrolls within its frame. Sort any column by clicking its header. @ before an opponent name indicates an away game.

Date	Opponent	Score	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Elo Δ	Points
1995-04-21	Kongsvinger	W 6-0	1726	1629	59.8%	19.5%	20.7%	+21.0	3
1995-04-21	@ Rosenborg	L 0-6	1629	1726	20.7%	19.5%	59.8%	-21.0	0
1995-04-22	Molde	L 0-6	1607	1480	63.3%	18.4%	18.3%	-54.8	0
1995-04-22	@ Brann	W 6-0	1480	1607	18.3%	18.4%	63.3%	+54.8	3
1995-04-22	Tromso	L 0-1	1612	1628	45.3%	22.1%	32.6%	-7.9	0
1995-04-22	@ Hamarkameratene	W 1-0	1628	1612	32.6%	22.1%	45.3%	+7.9	3
1995-04-22	Strindheim	D 1-1	1478	1457	50.3%	21.6%	28.1%	-0.8	1
1995-04-22	@ Hodd	D 1-1	1457	1478	28.1%	21.6%	50.3%	+0.8	1
1995-04-22	Start	W 3-1	1688	1686	47.6%	21.9%	30.4%	+9.4	3
1995-04-22	@ Lillestrom	L 1-3	1686	1688	30.4%	21.9%	47.6%	-9.4	0
1995-04-22	Valerenga	L 0-2	1509	1604	34.2%	22.3%	43.5%	-11.9	0
1995-04-22	@ Stabaek	W 2-0	1604	1509	43.5%	22.3%	34.2%	+11.9	3
1995-04-22	Bodo Glimt	W 6-0	1671	1601	56.7%	20.3%	23.0%	+23.3	3
1995-04-22	@ Viking	L 0-6	1601	1671	23.0%	20.3%	56.7%	-23.3	0
1995-04-29	Viking	W 5-4	1534	1695	26.4%	21.2%	52.4%	+7.7	6
1995-04-29	@ Molde	L 4-5	1695	1534	52.4%	21.2%	26.4%	-7.7	3
1995-04-30	Lillestrom	D 3-3	1577	1697	31.0%	22.0%	47.0%	+0.4	1
1995-04-30	@ Bodo Glimt	D 3-3	1697	1577	47.0%	22.0%	31.0%	-0.4	4
1995-04-30	Brann	W 1-0	1608	1552	54.9%	20.7%	24.4%	+4.7	3
1995-04-30	@ Kongsvinger	L 0-1	1552	1608	24.4%	20.7%	54.9%	-4.7	0
1995-04-30	Stabaek	W 4-1	1677	1497	69.0%	16.2%	14.8%	+6.4	3
1995-04-30	@ Start	L 1-4	1497	1677	14.8%	16.2%	69.0%	-6.4	0
1995-04-30	Rosenborg	L 0-5	1458	1747	15.6%	16.9%	67.5%	-13.1	1
1995-04-30	@ Strindheim	W 5-0	1747	1458	67.5%	16.9%	15.6%	+13.1	6
1995-04-30	Hodd	W 4-1	1636	1478	66.7%	17.2%	16.1%	+7.1	6
1995-04-30	@ Tromso	L 1-4	1478	1636	16.1%	17.2%	66.7%	-7.1	1
1995-04-30	Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	1616	1604	49.2%	21.7%	29.1%	-8.0	3
1995-04-30	@ Valerenga	W 2-1	1604	1616	29.1%	21.7%	49.2%	+8.0	3
1995-05-03	Rosenborg	D 1-1	1547	1760	21.3%	19.7%	59.0%	+1.5	1
1995-05-03	@ Brann	D 1-1	1760	1547	59.0%	19.7%	21.3%	-1.5	7
1995-05-03	Start	D 0-0	1612	1684	37.4%	22.4%	40.2%	+0.1	4
1995-05-03	@ Hamarkameratene	D 0-0	1684	1612	40.2%	22.4%	37.4%	-0.1	4
1995-05-03	Valerenga	W 3-0	1470	1608	28.9%	21.7%	49.4%	+23.3	4
1995-05-03	@ Hodd	L 0-3	1608	1470	49.4%	21.7%	28.9%	-23.3	3
1995-05-03	Molde	L 0-1	1697	1542	66.3%	17.3%	16.4%	-10.9	4
1995-05-03	@ Lillestrom	W 1-0	1542	1697	16.4%	17.3%	66.3%	+10.9	9
1995-05-03	Bodo Glimt	W 4-0	1491	1578	35.3%	22.3%	42.4%	+26.8	3
1995-05-03	@ Stabaek	L 0-4	1578	1491	42.4%	22.3%	35.3%	-26.8	1
1995-05-03	Tromso	W 1-0	1445	1643	22.7%	20.2%	57.1%	+9.6	4
1995-05-03	@ Strindheim	L 0-1	1643	1445	57.1%	20.2%	22.7%	-9.6	6
1995-05-03	Kongsvinger	D 0-0	1687	1613	57.1%	20.2%	22.7%	-1.5	4
1995-05-03	@ Viking	D 0-0	1613	1687	22.7%	20.2%	57.1%	+1.5	4
1995-05-06	Hamarkameratene	W 5-0	1551	1612	38.9%	22.4%	38.7%	+30.8	4
1995-05-06	@ Bodo Glimt	L 0-5	1612	1551	38.7%	22.4%	38.9%	-30.8	4
1995-05-07	Strindheim	W 4-1	1549	1455	59.5%	19.6%	20.9%	+9.3	4
1995-05-07	@ Brann	L 1-4	1455	1549	20.9%	19.6%	59.5%	-9.4	4
1995-05-07	Lillestrom	L 1-3	1614	1686	37.4%	22.4%	40.2%	-11.1	4
1995-05-07	@ Kongsvinger	W 3-1	1686	1614	40.2%	22.4%	37.4%	+11.1	7
1995-05-07	Stabaek	W 1-0	1553	1518	52.2%	21.3%	26.6%	+5.1	12
1995-05-07	@ Molde	L 0-1	1518	1553	26.6%	21.3%	52.2%	-5.1	3
1995-05-07	Viking	W 1-0	1759	1686	57.0%	20.3%	22.8%	+4.4	10
1995-05-07	@ Rosenborg	L 0-1	1686	1759	22.8%	20.3%	57.0%	-4.4	4
1995-05-07	Hodd	L 0-2	1683	1494	70.0%	15.8%	14.2%	-21.4	4
1995-05-07	@ Start	W 2-0	1494	1683	14.2%	15.8%	70.0%	+21.3	7
1995-05-07	Tromso	W 2-1	1585	1633	40.7%	22.4%	36.9%	+6.3	6
1995-05-07	@ Valerenga	L 1-2	1633	1585	36.9%	22.4%	40.7%	-6.3	6
1995-05-13	Rosenborg	L 1-3	1697	1763	38.1%	22.4%	39.5%	-11.3	7
1995-05-13	@ Lillestrom	W 3-1	1763	1697	39.5%	22.4%	38.1%	+11.3	13
1995-05-14	Molde	L 1-2	1581	1558	50.6%	21.5%	27.9%	-8.2	4
1995-05-14	@ Hamarkameratene	W 2-1	1558	1581	27.9%	21.5%	50.6%	+8.2	15
1995-05-14	Bodo Glimt	D 0-0	1515	1582	38.1%	22.4%	39.5%	+0.1	8
1995-05-14	@ Hodd	D 0-0	1582	1515	39.5%	22.4%	38.1%	-0.0	5
1995-05-14	Kongsvinger	D 0-0	1513	1603	34.8%	22.3%	42.9%	+0.3	4
1995-05-14	@ Stabaek	D 0-0	1603	1513	42.9%	22.3%	34.8%	-0.3	5
1995-05-14	Valerenga	L 1-2	1445	1591	27.9%	21.5%	50.5%	-5.0	4
1995-05-14	@ Strindheim	W 2-1	1591	1445	50.5%	21.5%	27.9%	+5.0	9
1995-05-14	Start	L 1-4	1627	1662	42.6%	22.3%	35.1%	-17.4	6
1995-05-14	@ Tromso	W 4-1	1662	1627	35.1%	22.3%	42.6%	+17.4	7
1995-05-14	Brann	W 2-0	1681	1558	62.9%	18.6%	18.6%	+6.8	7
1995-05-14	@ Viking	L 0-2	1558	1681	18.6%	18.6%	62.9%	-6.8	4
1995-05-16	Tromso	L 1-2	1582	1609	43.6%	22.3%	34.1%	-7.2	5
1995-05-16	@ Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	1609	1582	34.1%	22.3%	43.6%	+7.2	9
1995-05-16	Lillestrom	D 1-1	1551	1686	29.3%	21.8%	48.9%	+0.7	5
1995-05-16	@ Brann	D 1-1	1686	1551	48.9%	21.8%	29.3%	-0.7	8
1995-05-16	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	1603	1573	51.5%	21.4%	27.1%	+12.0	8
1995-05-16	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-4	1573	1603	27.1%	21.4%	51.5%	-12.0	4
1995-05-16	Hodd	W 7-2	1566	1515	54.2%	20.9%	24.9%	+14.7	18
1995-05-16	@ Molde	L 2-7	1515	1566	24.9%	20.9%	54.2%	-14.7	8
1995-05-16	Stabaek	W 5-2	1774	1513	76.9%	12.6%	10.5%	+3.8	16
1995-05-16	@ Rosenborg	L 2-5	1513	1774	10.5%	12.6%	76.9%	-3.8	4
1995-05-16	Valerenga	L 0-1	1679	1596	58.2%	20.0%	21.9%	-9.8	7
1995-05-16	@ Start	W 1-0	1596	1679	21.9%	20.0%	58.2%	+9.8	12
1995-05-16	Strindheim	W 2-1	1688	1440	75.6%	13.2%	11.2%	+1.9	10
1995-05-16	@ Viking	L 1-2	1440	1688	11.2%	13.2%	75.6%	-1.9	4
1995-05-21	Rosenborg	L 1-3	1561	1778	20.9%	19.6%	59.5%	-6.6	4
1995-05-21	@ Hamarkameratene	W 3-1	1778	1561	59.5%	19.6%	20.9%	+6.6	19
1995-05-21	Kongsvinger	W 3-0	1500	1615	31.7%	22.1%	46.2%	+22.0	11
1995-05-21	@ Hodd	L 0-3	1615	1500	46.2%	22.1%	31.7%	-22.0	8
1995-05-21	Viking	W 4-1	1685	1690	46.8%	22.0%	31.2%	+13.5	11
1995-05-21	@ Lillestrom	L 1-4	1690	1685	31.2%	22.0%	46.8%	-13.5	10
1995-05-21	Brann	W 3-0	1509	1552	41.5%	22.4%	36.1%	+18.1	7
1995-05-21	@ Stabaek	L 0-3	1552	1509	36.1%	22.4%	41.5%	-18.1	5
1995-05-21	Start	L 2-6	1438	1670	19.8%	19.1%	61.1%	-9.7	4
1995-05-21	@ Strindheim	W 6-2	1670	1438	61.1%	19.1%	19.8%	+9.7	10
1995-05-21	Molde	D 2-2	1617	1581	52.2%	21.2%	26.5%	-0.7	10
1995-05-21	@ Tromso	D 2-2	1581	1617	26.5%	21.2%	52.2%	+0.7	19
1995-05-21	Bodo Glimt	L 0-4	1606	1574	51.7%	21.3%	26.9%	-31.6	12
1995-05-21	@ Valerenga	W 4-0	1574	1606	26.9%	21.3%	51.7%	+31.6	8
1995-05-28	Start	L 1-2	1606	1679	37.1%	22.4%	40.5%	-6.4	8
1995-05-28	@ Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	1679	1606	40.5%	22.4%	37.1%	+6.4	13
1995-05-28	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	1534	1554	44.7%	22.2%	33.1%	+14.2	8
1995-05-28	@ Brann	L 1-4	1554	1534	33.1%	22.2%	44.7%	-14.2	4
1995-05-28	Tromso	D 1-1	1593	1616	44.3%	22.2%	33.5%	-0.4	9
1995-05-28	@ Kongsvinger	D 1-1	1616	1593	33.5%	22.2%	44.3%	+0.4	11
1995-05-28	Strindheim	W 3-0	1698	1429	77.6%	12.2%	10.2%	+5.0	14
1995-05-28	@ Lillestrom	L 0-3	1429	1698	10.2%	12.2%	77.6%	-4.9	4
1995-05-28	Valerenga	L 0-1	1582	1574	48.4%	21.8%	29.7%	-8.4	19
1995-05-28	@ Molde	W 1-0	1574	1582	29.7%	21.8%	48.4%	+8.4	15
1995-05-28	Hodd	W 6-1	1785	1522	77.0%	12.6%	10.5%	+6.8	22
1995-05-28	@ Rosenborg	L 1-6	1522	1785	10.5%	12.6%	77.0%	-6.9	11
1995-05-28	Stabaek	W 2-0	1676	1527	65.8%	17.5%	16.7%	+6.0	13
1995-05-28	@ Viking	L 0-2	1527	1676	16.7%	17.5%	65.8%	-6.0	7
1995-06-02	Viking	L 0-5	1540	1682	28.4%	21.6%	50.0%	-23.8	4
1995-06-02	@ Hamarkameratene	W 5-0	1682	1540	50.0%	21.6%	28.4%	+23.8	16
1995-06-02	Brann	W 1-0	1516	1548	43.0%	22.3%	34.7%	+6.4	14
1995-06-02	@ Hodd	L 0-1	1548	1516	34.7%	22.3%	43.0%	-6.4	8
1995-06-02	Lillestrom	L 0-2	1521	1703	24.2%	20.7%	55.2%	-8.8	7
1995-06-02	@ Stabaek	W 2-0	1703	1521	55.2%	20.7%	24.2%	+8.8	17
1995-06-02	Molde	L 1-3	1686	1573	61.7%	18.9%	19.4%	-16.7	13
1995-06-02	@ Start	W 3-1	1573	1686	19.4%	18.9%	61.7%	+16.7	22
1995-06-02	Bodo Glimt	D 1-1	1424	1600	24.8%	20.8%	54.4%	+1.1	5
1995-06-02	@ Strindheim	D 1-1	1600	1424	54.4%	20.8%	24.8%	-1.2	9
1995-06-02	Rosenborg	L 1-2	1616	1792	24.8%	20.9%	54.3%	-4.5	11
1995-06-02	@ Tromso	W 2-1	1792	1616	54.3%	20.9%	24.8%	+4.5	25
1995-06-02	Kongsvinger	L 1-3	1583	1592	46.2%	22.1%	31.8%	-13.1	15
1995-06-02	@ Valerenga	W 3-1	1592	1583	31.8%	22.1%	46.2%	+13.1	12
1995-06-11	Tromso	W 4-2	1542	1612	37.6%	22.4%	40.0%	+10.5	11
1995-06-11	@ Brann	L 2-4	1612	1542	40.0%	22.4%	37.6%	-10.5	11
1995-06-11	Start	W 2-0	1606	1669	38.6%	22.4%	39.0%	+13.2	15
1995-06-11	@ Kongsvinger	L 0-2	1669	1606	39.0%	22.4%	38.6%	-13.2	13
1995-06-11	Hamarkameratene	D 2-2	1712	1516	70.7%	15.5%	13.8%	-1.7	18
1995-06-11	@ Lillestrom	D 2-2	1516	1712	13.8%	15.5%	70.7%	+1.7	5
1995-06-11	Bodo Glimt	L 0-3	1590	1598	46.3%	22.1%	31.6%	-22.1	22
1995-06-11	@ Molde	W 3-0	1598	1590	31.6%	22.1%	46.3%	+22.1	12
1995-06-11	Valerenga	W 3-2	1796	1570	73.7%	14.2%	12.2%	+2.0	28
1995-06-11	@ Rosenborg	L 2-3	1570	1796	12.2%	14.2%	73.7%	-2.0	15
1995-06-11	Strindheim	W 3-0	1512	1425	58.7%	19.8%	21.5%	+11.4	10
1995-06-11	@ Stabaek	L 0-3	1425	1512	21.5%	19.8%	58.7%	-11.4	5
1995-06-11	Hodd	W 3-0	1706	1522	69.5%	16.0%	14.5%	+7.5	19
1995-06-11	@ Viking	L 0-3	1522	1706	14.5%	16.0%	69.5%	-7.5	14
1995-06-14	Tromso	W 5-4	1710	1601	61.3%	19.1%	19.7%	+3.3	21
1995-06-14	@ Lillestrom	L 4-5	1601	1710	19.7%	19.1%	61.3%	-3.3	11
1995-06-18	Kongsvinger	D 2-2	1620	1619	47.7%	21.9%	30.4%	-0.5	13
1995-06-18	@ Bodo Glimt	D 2-2	1619	1620	30.4%	21.9%	47.7%	+0.5	16
1995-06-18	Stabaek	W 5-0	1518	1524	46.7%	22.0%	31.3%	+25.9	8
1995-06-18	@ Hamarkameratene	L 0-5	1524	1518	31.3%	22.0%	46.7%	-25.9	10
1995-06-18	Lillestrom	L 0-1	1515	1714	22.5%	20.2%	57.3%	-4.4	14
1995-06-18	@ Hodd	W 1-0	1714	1515	57.3%	20.2%	22.5%	+4.4	24
1995-06-18	Rosenborg	L 1-3	1656	1798	28.4%	21.6%	50.0%	-8.8	13
1995-06-18	@ Start	W 3-1	1798	1656	50.0%	21.6%	28.4%	+8.8	31
1995-06-18	Molde	L 1-3	1413	1568	27.0%	21.4%	51.6%	-8.4	5
1995-06-18	@ Strindheim	W 3-1	1568	1413	51.6%	21.4%	27.0%	+8.5	25
1995-06-18	Viking	W 1-0	1598	1714	31.6%	22.0%	46.4%	+8.1	14
1995-06-18	@ Tromso	L 0-1	1714	1598	46.4%	22.0%	31.6%	-8.1	19
1995-06-18	Brann	W 3-1	1568	1552	49.6%	21.7%	28.7%	+8.9	18
1995-06-18	@ Valerenga	L 1-3	1552	1568	28.7%	21.7%	49.6%	-8.9	11
1995-06-25	Start	L 0-4	1543	1647	33.1%	22.2%	44.8%	-22.0	11
1995-06-25	@ Brann	W 4-0	1647	1543	44.8%	22.2%	33.1%	+22.0	16
1995-06-25	Strindheim	D 0-0	1544	1405	64.6%	17.9%	17.4%	-2.1	9
1995-06-25	@ Hamarkameratene	D 0-0	1405	1544	17.4%	17.9%	64.6%	+2.1	6
1995-06-25	Molde	L 0-2	1619	1576	53.2%	21.1%	25.7%	-17.0	16
1995-06-25	@ Kongsvinger	W 2-0	1576	1619	25.7%	21.1%	53.2%	+17.0	28
1995-06-25	Bodo Glimt	D 3-3	1807	1620	69.8%	15.9%	14.3%	-1.4	32
1995-06-25	@ Rosenborg	D 3-3	1620	1807	14.3%	15.9%	69.8%	+1.4	14
1995-06-25	Hodd	W 3-1	1498	1510	45.8%	22.1%	32.1%	+9.8	13
1995-06-25	@ Stabaek	L 1-3	1510	1498	32.1%	22.1%	45.8%	-9.8	14
1995-06-25	Valerenga	W 5-0	1706	1577	63.5%	18.3%	18.1%	+15.4	22
1995-06-25	@ Viking	L 0-5	1577	1706	18.1%	18.3%	63.5%	-15.4	18
1995-06-28	Stabaek	D 2-2	1606	1508	60.0%	19.4%	20.5%	-1.2	15
1995-06-28	@ Tromso	D 2-2	1508	1606	20.5%	19.4%	60.0%	+1.2	14
1995-07-02	Brann	W 3-1	1621	1521	60.2%	19.4%	20.4%	+6.5	17
1995-07-02	@ Bodo Glimt	L 1-3	1521	1621	20.4%	19.4%	60.2%	-6.5	11
1995-07-02	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	1500	1542	41.7%	22.4%	35.9%	+15.2	17
1995-07-02	@ Hodd	L 1-4	1542	1500	35.9%	22.4%	41.7%	-15.2	9
1995-07-02	Rosenborg	D 2-2	1593	1806	21.4%	19.8%	58.9%	+1.1	29
1995-07-02	@ Molde	D 2-2	1806	1593	58.9%	19.8%	21.4%	-1.1	33
1995-07-02	Viking	L 0-2	1669	1721	40.2%	22.4%	37.4%	-13.5	16
1995-07-02	@ Start	W 2-0	1721	1669	37.4%	22.4%	40.2%	+13.6	25
1995-07-02	Kongsvinger	L 1-3	1407	1602	22.9%	20.3%	56.8%	-7.2	6
1995-07-02	@ Strindheim	W 3-1	1602	1407	56.8%	20.3%	22.9%	+7.2	19
1995-07-02	Lillestrom	D 0-0	1561	1718	26.8%	21.3%	51.9%	+1.1	19
1995-07-02	@ Valerenga	D 0-0	1718	1561	51.9%	21.3%	26.8%	-1.1	25
1995-07-12	Tromso	L 0-2	1509	1605	34.1%	22.2%	43.7%	-11.9	14
1995-07-12	@ Stabaek	W 2-0	1605	1509	43.7%	22.2%	34.1%	+11.9	18
1995-07-16	Bodo Glimt	W 4-2	1515	1628	31.9%	22.1%	46.0%	+11.7	14
1995-07-16	@ Brann	L 2-4	1628	1515	46.0%	22.1%	31.9%	-11.7	17
1995-07-16	Hodd	W 2-1	1527	1516	49.0%	21.8%	29.3%	+5.2	12
1995-07-16	@ Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	1516	1527	29.3%	21.8%	49.0%	-5.2	17
1995-07-16	Strindheim	W 5-1	1610	1400	72.0%	14.9%	13.1%	+7.2	22
1995-07-16	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-5	1400	1610	13.1%	14.9%	72.0%	-7.2	6
1995-07-16	Valerenga	L 1-3	1717	1562	66.4%	17.3%	16.3%	-17.7	25
1995-07-16	@ Lillestrom	W 3-1	1562	1717	16.3%	17.3%	66.4%	+17.7	22
1995-07-16	Start	L 1-3	1735	1655	57.7%	20.1%	22.2%	-15.8	25
1995-07-16	@ Viking	W 3-1	1655	1735	22.2%	20.1%	57.7%	+15.8	19
1995-07-19	Lillestrom	D 0-0	1617	1699	35.9%	22.4%	41.8%	+0.2	19
1995-07-19	@ Tromso	D 0-0	1699	1617	41.8%	22.4%	35.9%	-0.2	26
1995-07-23	Rosenborg	L 1-2	1616	1804	23.5%	20.5%	56.0%	-4.3	17
1995-07-23	@ Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	1804	1616	56.0%	20.5%	23.5%	+4.3	36
1995-07-23	Stabaek	D 1-1	1510	1497	49.3%	21.7%	29.0%	-0.8	18
1995-07-23	@ Hodd	D 1-1	1497	1510	29.0%	21.7%	49.3%	+0.8	15
1995-07-23	Kongsvinger	W 3-1	1594	1617	44.4%	22.2%	33.4%	+10.1	32
1995-07-23	@ Molde	L 1-3	1617	1594	33.4%	22.2%	44.4%	-10.1	22
1995-07-23	Brann	W 1-0	1671	1527	65.3%	17.7%	17.0%	+3.3	22
1995-07-23	@ Start	L 0-1	1527	1671	17.0%	17.7%	65.3%	-3.3	14
1995-07-23	Hamarkameratene	L 2-4	1393	1532	28.7%	21.7%	49.6%	-8.0	6
1995-07-23	@ Strindheim	W 4-2	1532	1393	49.6%	21.7%	28.7%	+8.0	15
1995-07-23	Viking	D 1-1	1580	1719	28.8%	21.7%	49.5%	+0.8	23
1995-07-23	@ Valerenga	D 1-1	1719	1580	49.5%	21.7%	28.8%	-0.8	26
1995-07-30	Valerenga	W 2-1	1523	1581	39.4%	22.4%	38.2%	+6.5	17
1995-07-30	@ Brann	L 1-2	1581	1523	38.2%	22.4%	39.4%	-6.5	23
1995-07-30	Bodo Glimt	L 1-2	1607	1612	46.8%	22.0%	31.2%	-7.7	22
1995-07-30	@ Kongsvinger	W 2-1	1612	1607	31.2%	22.0%	46.8%	+7.7	20
1995-07-30	Hodd	W 6-0	1699	1510	70.0%	15.8%	14.2%	+14.0	29
1995-07-30	@ Lillestrom	L 0-6	1510	1699	14.2%	15.8%	70.0%	-14.0	18
1995-07-30	Strindheim	W 4-1	1605	1385	73.0%	14.4%	12.5%	+5.3	35
1995-07-30	@ Molde	L 1-4	1385	1605	12.5%	14.4%	73.0%	-5.3	6
1995-07-30	Start	W 4-1	1809	1674	64.1%	18.1%	17.8%	+7.9	39
1995-07-30	@ Rosenborg	L 1-4	1674	1809	17.8%	18.1%	64.1%	-7.9	22
1995-07-30	Hamarkameratene	W 3-1	1498	1540	41.6%	22.4%	36.0%	+10.8	18
1995-07-30	@ Stabaek	L 1-3	1540	1498	36.0%	22.4%	41.6%	-10.8	15
1995-07-30	Tromso	W 3-1	1718	1617	60.3%	19.4%	20.3%	+6.4	29
1995-07-30	@ Viking	L 1-3	1617	1718	20.3%	19.4%	60.3%	-6.4	19
1995-08-05	Viking	L 0-1	1496	1724	20.0%	19.2%	60.8%	-3.9	18
1995-08-05	@ Hodd	W 1-0	1724	1496	60.8%	19.2%	20.0%	+3.9	32
1995-08-06	Molde	W 3-2	1619	1610	48.8%	21.8%	29.4%	+5.0	23
1995-08-06	@ Bodo Glimt	L 2-3	1610	1619	29.4%	21.8%	48.8%	-5.0	35
1995-08-06	Lillestrom	L 0-2	1529	1713	24.0%	20.6%	55.4%	-8.7	15
1995-08-06	@ Hamarkameratene	W 2-0	1713	1529	55.4%	20.6%	24.0%	+8.7	32
1995-08-06	Kongsvinger	W 6-2	1667	1599	56.3%	20.4%	23.3%	+11.4	25
1995-08-06	@ Start	L 2-6	1599	1667	23.3%	20.4%	56.3%	-11.4	22
1995-08-06	Stabaek	W 2-1	1379	1509	29.9%	21.8%	48.3%	+7.9	9
1995-08-06	@ Strindheim	L 1-2	1509	1379	48.3%	21.8%	29.9%	-7.9	18
1995-08-06	Brann	D 2-2	1611	1530	57.9%	20.0%	22.1%	-1.1	20
1995-08-06	@ Tromso	D 2-2	1530	1611	22.1%	20.0%	57.9%	+1.0	18
1995-08-06	Rosenborg	W 2-1	1574	1817	18.9%	18.7%	62.4%	+9.8	26
1995-08-06	@ Valerenga	L 1-2	1817	1574	62.4%	18.7%	18.9%	-9.7	39
1995-08-18	Hamarkameratene	L 0-2	1728	1520	71.9%	15.0%	13.2%	-21.8	32
1995-08-18	@ Viking	W 2-0	1520	1728	13.2%	15.0%	71.9%	+21.8	18
1995-08-20	Strindheim	W 3-2	1624	1387	74.7%	13.7%	11.7%	+1.9	26
1995-08-20	@ Bodo Glimt	L 2-3	1387	1624	11.7%	13.7%	74.7%	-1.9	9
1995-08-20	Hodd	L 1-2	1531	1492	52.7%	21.2%	26.1%	-8.5	18
1995-08-20	@ Brann	W 2-1	1492	1531	26.1%	21.2%	52.7%	+8.5	21
1995-08-20	Valerenga	D 2-2	1588	1584	48.0%	21.9%	30.1%	-0.5	23
1995-08-20	@ Kongsvinger	D 2-2	1584	1588	30.1%	21.9%	48.0%	+0.5	27
1995-08-20	Stabaek	D 2-2	1722	1501	73.1%	14.4%	12.5%	-1.8	33
1995-08-20	@ Lillestrom	D 2-2	1501	1722	12.5%	14.4%	73.1%	+1.8	19
1995-08-20	Start	W 2-1	1605	1678	37.2%	22.4%	40.4%	+6.8	38
1995-08-20	@ Molde	L 1-2	1678	1605	40.4%	22.4%	37.2%	-6.8	25
1995-08-20	Tromso	W 2-0	1807	1610	70.8%	15.5%	13.7%	+4.8	42
1995-08-20	@ Rosenborg	L 0-2	1610	1807	13.7%	15.5%	70.8%	-4.8	20
1995-08-26	Bodo Glimt	L 2-5	1671	1626	53.4%	21.0%	25.5%	-18.1	25
1995-08-26	@ Start	W 5-2	1626	1671	25.5%	21.0%	53.4%	+18.2	29
1995-08-27	Brann	L 1-3	1542	1522	50.1%	21.6%	28.3%	-14.0	18
1995-08-27	@ Hamarkameratene	W 3-1	1522	1542	28.3%	21.6%	50.1%	+14.1	21
1995-08-27	Rosenborg	L 1-4	1500	1812	14.3%	15.9%	69.9%	-6.2	21
1995-08-27	@ Hodd	W 4-1	1812	1500	69.9%	15.9%	14.3%	+6.2	45
1995-08-27	Viking	W 2-0	1502	1706	22.1%	20.0%	57.9%	+18.3	22
1995-08-27	@ Stabaek	L 0-2	1706	1502	57.9%	20.0%	22.1%	-18.3	32
1995-08-27	Lillestrom	D 1-1	1385	1720	13.0%	14.8%	72.2%	+2.4	10
1995-08-27	@ Strindheim	D 1-1	1720	1385	72.2%	14.8%	13.0%	-2.4	34
1995-08-27	Kongsvinger	W 8-0	1605	1587	49.9%	21.6%	28.5%	+37.3	23
1995-08-27	@ Tromso	L 0-8	1587	1605	28.5%	21.6%	49.9%	-37.3	23
1995-08-27	Molde	D 2-2	1585	1612	43.7%	22.2%	34.0%	-0.3	28
1995-08-27	@ Valerenga	D 2-2	1612	1585	34.0%	22.2%	43.7%	+0.3	39
1995-09-02	Valerenga	D 2-2	1644	1584	55.4%	20.6%	24.0%	-0.9	30
1995-09-02	@ Bodo Glimt	D 2-2	1584	1644	24.0%	20.6%	55.4%	+0.9	29
1995-09-02	Stabaek	W 1-0	1536	1521	49.6%	21.7%	28.7%	+5.5	24
1995-09-02	@ Brann	L 0-1	1521	1536	28.7%	21.7%	49.6%	-5.5	22
1995-09-02	Hodd	W 2-1	1550	1494	54.8%	20.8%	24.4%	+4.5	26
1995-09-02	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-2	1494	1550	24.4%	20.8%	54.8%	-4.5	21
1995-09-02	Tromso	L 0-7	1612	1642	43.3%	22.3%	34.4%	-46.2	39
1995-09-02	@ Molde	W 7-0	1642	1612	34.4%	22.3%	43.3%	+46.2	26
1995-09-02	Hamarkameratene	W 9-1	1818	1528	79.3%	11.3%	9.3%	+9.2	48
1995-09-02	@ Rosenborg	L 1-9	1528	1818	9.3%	11.3%	79.3%	-9.2	18
1995-09-02	Strindheim	L 4-6	1653	1388	77.2%	12.4%	10.4%	-16.2	25
1995-09-02	@ Start	W 6-4	1388	1653	10.4%	12.4%	77.2%	+16.2	13
1995-09-02	Lillestrom	W 3-1	1688	1717	43.4%	22.3%	34.3%	+10.4	35
1995-09-02	@ Viking	L 1-3	1717	1688	34.3%	22.3%	43.4%	-10.4	34
1995-09-08	Viking	W 5-3	1404	1699	15.3%	16.6%	68.1%	+15.3	16
1995-09-08	@ Strindheim	L 3-5	1699	1404	68.1%	16.6%	15.3%	-15.3	35
1995-09-09	Brann	L 1-3	1707	1542	67.5%	16.9%	15.7%	-18.0	34
1995-09-09	@ Lillestrom	W 3-1	1542	1707	15.7%	16.9%	67.5%	+18.0	27
1995-09-09	Bodo Glimt	L 0-4	1688	1644	53.4%	21.0%	25.6%	-32.5	26
1995-09-09	@ Tromso	W 4-0	1644	1688	25.6%	21.0%	53.4%	+32.5	33
1995-09-10	Kongsvinger	W 2-1	1519	1554	42.6%	22.3%	35.1%	+6.1	21
1995-09-10	@ Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	1554	1519	35.1%	22.3%	42.6%	-6.1	26
1995-09-10	Molde	D 2-2	1490	1566	36.8%	22.4%	40.9%	+0.1	22
1995-09-10	@ Hodd	D 2-2	1566	1490	40.9%	22.4%	36.8%	-0.1	40
1995-09-10	Rosenborg	W 2-1	1515	1827	14.2%	15.9%	69.9%	+10.7	25
1995-09-10	@ Stabaek	L 1-2	1827	1515	69.9%	15.9%	14.2%	-10.7	48
1995-09-10	Start	W 4-1	1585	1637	40.2%	22.4%	37.4%	+15.7	32
1995-09-10	@ Valerenga	L 1-4	1637	1585	37.4%	22.4%	40.2%	-15.7	25
1995-09-23	Lillestrom	W 2-1	1816	1689	63.3%	18.4%	18.3%	+3.3	51
1995-09-23	@ Rosenborg	L 1-2	1689	1816	18.3%	18.4%	63.3%	-3.3	34
1995-09-24	Hodd	W 4-0	1676	1490	69.7%	16.0%	14.4%	+9.7	36
1995-09-24	@ Bodo Glimt	L 0-4	1490	1676	14.4%	16.0%	69.7%	-9.7	22
1995-09-24	Stabaek	D 0-0	1548	1526	50.4%	21.6%	28.0%	-1.0	27
1995-09-24	@ Kongsvinger	D 0-0	1526	1548	28.0%	21.6%	50.4%	+1.0	26
1995-09-24	Hamarkameratene	W 3-2	1566	1525	52.9%	21.1%	26.0%	+4.5	43
1995-09-24	@ Molde	L 2-3	1525	1566	26.0%	21.1%	52.9%	-4.5	21
1995-09-24	Tromso	W 2-1	1621	1656	42.7%	22.3%	35.0%	+6.1	28
1995-09-24	@ Start	L 1-2	1656	1621	35.0%	22.3%	42.7%	-6.1	26
1995-09-24	Strindheim	W 9-2	1601	1419	69.2%	16.2%	14.6%	+11.3	35
1995-09-24	@ Valerenga	L 2-9	1419	1601	14.6%	16.2%	69.2%	-11.3	16
1995-09-30	Rosenborg	D 2-2	1683	1820	29.0%	21.7%	49.3%	+0.6	36
1995-09-30	@ Viking	D 2-2	1820	1683	49.3%	21.7%	29.0%	-0.6	52
1995-10-01	Bodo Glimt	L 0-6	1520	1686	25.9%	21.1%	53.0%	-26.0	21
1995-10-01	@ Hamarkameratene	W 6-0	1686	1520	53.0%	21.1%	25.9%	+26.0	39
1995-10-01	Start	W 2-1	1480	1627	27.8%	21.5%	50.7%	+8.2	25
1995-10-01	@ Hodd	L 1-2	1627	1480	50.7%	21.5%	27.8%	-8.2	28
1995-10-01	Kongsvinger	W 3-1	1686	1547	64.6%	17.9%	17.4%	+5.5	37
1995-10-01	@ Lillestrom	L 1-3	1547	1686	17.4%	17.9%	64.6%	-5.5	27
1995-10-01	Molde	W 3-1	1527	1570	41.5%	22.4%	36.2%	+10.8	29
1995-10-01	@ Stabaek	L 1-3	1570	1527	36.2%	22.4%	41.5%	-10.8	43
1995-10-01	Brann	D 2-2	1408	1560	27.3%	21.4%	51.3%	+0.7	17
1995-10-01	@ Strindheim	D 2-2	1560	1408	51.3%	21.4%	27.3%	-0.7	28
1995-10-01	Valerenga	W 2-1	1650	1612	52.5%	21.2%	26.3%	+4.8	29
1995-10-01	@ Tromso	L 1-2	1612	1650	26.3%	21.2%	52.5%	-4.8	35
1995-10-04	Molde	W 2-0	1819	1559	76.8%	12.7%	10.6%	+3.6	55
1995-10-04	@ Rosenborg	L 0-2	1559	1819	10.6%	12.7%	76.8%	-3.6	43
1995-10-04	Viking	W 2-1	1559	1684	30.4%	21.9%	47.6%	+7.8	31
1995-10-04	@ Brann	L 1-2	1684	1559	47.6%	21.9%	30.4%	-7.8	36
1995-10-07	Lillestrom	L 1-2	1556	1691	29.1%	21.7%	49.1%	-5.2	43
1995-10-07	@ Molde	W 2-1	1691	1556	49.1%	21.7%	29.1%	+5.2	40
1995-10-08	Stabaek	L 0-1	1712	1538	68.4%	16.5%	15.1%	-11.1	39
1995-10-08	@ Bodo Glimt	W 1-0	1538	1712	15.1%	16.5%	68.4%	+11.1	32
1995-10-08	Viking	L 3-4	1542	1676	29.3%	21.8%	49.0%	-4.9	27
1995-10-08	@ Kongsvinger	W 4-3	1676	1542	49.0%	21.8%	29.3%	+4.9	39
1995-10-08	Brann	W 3-1	1823	1567	76.4%	12.8%	10.8%	+3.2	58
1995-10-08	@ Rosenborg	L 1-3	1567	1823	10.8%	12.8%	76.4%	-3.2	31
1995-10-08	Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	1619	1494	63.0%	18.5%	18.5%	-9.8	28
1995-10-08	@ Start	W 2-1	1494	1619	18.5%	18.5%	63.0%	+9.8	24
1995-10-08	Strindheim	W 1-0	1655	1408	75.5%	13.3%	11.2%	+2.0	32
1995-10-08	@ Tromso	L 0-1	1408	1655	11.2%	13.3%	75.5%	-2.0	17
1995-10-08	Hodd	W 3-2	1607	1488	62.4%	18.7%	18.9%	+3.3	38
1995-10-08	@ Valerenga	L 2-3	1488	1607	18.9%	18.7%	62.4%	-3.3	25
1995-10-15	Kongsvinger	D 1-1	1564	1537	51.1%	21.4%	27.5%	-0.9	32
1995-10-15	@ Brann	D 1-1	1537	1564	27.5%	21.4%	51.1%	+0.9	28
1995-10-15	Valerenga	W 1-0	1504	1611	32.7%	22.1%	45.1%	+7.9	27
1995-10-15	@ Hamarkameratene	L 0-1	1611	1504	45.1%	22.1%	32.7%	-7.9	38
1995-10-15	Tromso	L 2-3	1485	1657	25.2%	20.9%	53.8%	-4.3	25
1995-10-15	@ Hodd	W 3-2	1657	1485	53.8%	20.9%	25.2%	+4.3	35
1995-10-15	Bodo Glimt	D 1-1	1696	1701	46.9%	22.0%	31.1%	-0.6	41
1995-10-15	@ Lillestrom	D 1-1	1701	1696	31.1%	22.0%	46.9%	+0.6	40
1995-10-15	Strindheim	W 2-1	1826	1406	88.6%	6.2%	5.2%	+0.8	61
1995-10-15	@ Rosenborg	L 1-2	1406	1826	5.2%	6.2%	88.6%	-0.8	17
1995-10-15	Start	L 1-3	1549	1609	39.0%	22.4%	38.6%	-11.5	32
1995-10-15	@ Stabaek	W 3-1	1609	1549	38.6%	22.4%	39.0%	+11.5	31
1995-10-15	Molde	D 2-2	1681	1550	63.7%	18.3%	18.0%	-1.4	40
1995-10-15	@ Viking	D 2-2	1550	1681	18.0%	18.3%	63.7%	+1.3	44
1995-10-22	Viking	W 6-2	1701	1680	50.4%	21.6%	28.1%	+13.5	43
1995-10-22	@ Bodo Glimt	L 2-6	1680	1701	28.1%	21.6%	50.4%	-13.5	40
1995-10-22	Rosenborg	D 1-1	1538	1827	15.6%	16.8%	67.5%	+2.1	29
1995-10-22	@ Kongsvinger	D 1-1	1827	1538	67.5%	16.8%	15.6%	-2.1	62
1995-10-22	Brann	W 4-2	1552	1563	46.0%	22.1%	31.9%	+8.7	47
1995-10-22	@ Molde	L 2-4	1563	1552	31.9%	22.1%	46.0%	-8.7	32
1995-10-22	Lillestrom	W 2-1	1621	1696	36.9%	22.4%	40.7%	+6.8	34
1995-10-22	@ Start	L 1-2	1696	1621	40.7%	22.4%	36.9%	-6.9	41
1995-10-22	Hodd	L 1-5	1406	1481	36.9%	22.4%	40.7%	-20.1	17
1995-10-22	@ Strindheim	W 5-1	1481	1406	40.7%	22.4%	36.9%	+20.1	28
1995-10-22	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	1661	1512	65.7%	17.5%	16.7%	+7.4	38
1995-10-22	@ Tromso	L 1-4	1512	1661	16.7%	17.5%	65.7%	-7.4	27
1995-10-22	Stabaek	D 2-2	1603	1537	56.0%	20.5%	23.5%	-1.0	39
1995-10-22	@ Valerenga	D 2-2	1537	1603	23.5%	20.5%	56.0%	+0.9	33

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	1995-09-02	10.36%	Strindheim	1388	6	@ Start	1653	4
2	1995-08-18	13.15%	Hamarkameratene	1520	2	@ Viking	1728	0
3	1995-05-07	14.17%	Hodd	1494	2	@ Start	1683	0
4	1995-09-10	14.25%	@ Stabaek	1515	2	Rosenborg	1827	1
5	1995-10-08	15.11%	Stabaek	1538	1	@ Bodo Glimt	1712	0
6	1995-09-08	15.28%	@ Strindheim	1404	5	Viking	1699	3
7	1995-09-09	15.66%	Brann	1542	3	@ Lillestrom	1707	1
8	1995-07-16	16.34%	Valerenga	1562	3	@ Lillestrom	1717	1
9	1995-05-03	16.36%	Molde	1542	1	@ Lillestrom	1697	0
10	1995-04-22	18.28%	Molde	1480	6	@ Brann	1607	0
11	1995-10-08	18.46%	Hamarkameratene	1494	2	@ Start	1619	1
12	1995-08-06	18.90%	@ Valerenga	1574	2	Rosenborg	1817	1
13	1995-06-02	19.40%	Molde	1573	3	@ Start	1686	1
14	1995-05-16	21.86%	Valerenga	1596	1	@ Start	1679	0
15	1995-08-27	22.09%	@ Stabaek	1502	2	Viking	1706	0
16	1995-07-16	22.21%	Start	1655	3	@ Viking	1735	1
17	1995-05-03	22.66%	@ Strindheim	1445	1	Tromso	1643	0
18	1995-08-26	25.54%	Bodo Glimt	1626	5	@ Start	1671	2
19	1995-09-09	25.55%	Bodo Glimt	1644	4	@ Tromso	1688	0
20	1995-06-25	25.73%	Molde	1576	2	@ Kongsvinger	1619	0
21	1995-08-20	26.14%	Hodd	1492	2	@ Brann	1531	1
22	1995-04-29	26.37%	@ Molde	1534	5	Viking	1695	4
23	1995-05-21	26.93%	Bodo Glimt	1574	4	@ Valerenga	1606	0
24	1995-10-01	27.81%	@ Hodd	1480	2	Start	1627	1
25	1995-05-14	27.88%	Molde	1558	2	@ Hamarkameratene	1581	1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that moved the Elo needle the most. Elo Δ is the magnitude of the rating swing; both teams move by the same amount per game (one up, one down). The winning side is shown first. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1995-04-22	54.78	Molde	6	1480	18.28%	@ Brann	0	1607	63.33%
2	1995-09-02	46.24	Tromso	7	1642	34.41%	@ Molde	0	1612	43.31%
3	1995-08-27	37.33	@ Tromso	8	1605	49.87%	Kongsvinger	0	1587	28.49%
4	1995-09-09	32.46	Bodo Glimt	4	1644	25.55%	@ Tromso	0	1688	53.41%
5	1995-05-21	31.60	Bodo Glimt	4	1574	26.93%	@ Valerenga	0	1606	51.73%
6	1995-05-06	30.78	@ Bodo Glimt	5	1551	38.89%	Hamarkameratene	0	1612	38.71%
7	1995-05-03	26.82	@ Stabaek	4	1491	35.31%	Bodo Glimt	0	1578	42.37%
8	1995-10-01	26.02	Bodo Glimt	6	1686	53.04%	@ Hamarkameratene	0	1520	25.85%
9	1995-06-18	25.93	@ Hamarkameratene	5	1518	46.68%	Stabaek	0	1524	31.31%
10	1995-06-02	23.81	Viking	5	1682	50.02%	@ Hamarkameratene	0	1540	28.37%
11	1995-04-22	23.28	@ Viking	6	1671	56.71%	Bodo Glimt	0	1601	22.97%
12	1995-05-03	23.28	@ Hodd	3	1470	28.88%	Valerenga	0	1608	49.42%
13	1995-06-11	22.07	Bodo Glimt	3	1598	31.62%	@ Molde	0	1590	46.33%
14	1995-05-21	22.04	@ Hodd	3	1500	31.69%	Kongsvinger	0	1615	46.25%
15	1995-06-25	22.02	Start	4	1647	44.75%	@ Brann	0	1543	33.07%
16	1995-08-18	21.77	Hamarkameratene	2	1520	13.15%	@ Viking	0	1728	71.86%
17	1995-05-07	21.35	Hodd	2	1494	14.17%	@ Start	0	1683	70.03%
18	1995-04-21	20.97	@ Rosenborg	6	1726	59.84%	Kongsvinger	0	1629	20.67%
19	1995-10-22	20.06	Hodd	5	1481	40.69%	@ Strindheim	1	1406	36.93%
20	1995-08-27	18.30	@ Stabaek	2	1502	22.09%	Viking	0	1706	57.88%
21	1995-08-26	18.15	Bodo Glimt	5	1626	25.54%	@ Start	2	1671	53.42%
22	1995-05-21	18.11	@ Stabaek	3	1509	41.51%	Brann	0	1552	36.14%
23	1995-09-09	17.98	Brann	3	1542	15.66%	@ Lillestrom	1	1707	67.49%
24	1995-07-16	17.74	Valerenga	3	1562	16.34%	@ Lillestrom	1	1717	66.36%
25	1995-05-14	17.38	Start	4	1662	35.11%	@ Tromso	1	1627	42.58%