Home / Leagues / NFL / 1948

1948 NFL Season

60 regular-season games · 2 playoff teams

Final

Champion

Philadelphia Eagles

1st Title

Runner-Up

Chicago Cardinals

2nd Appearance

Last Appearance: 1947

Biggest Overachiever

Chicago Cardinals

2.71 wins above expected

11 wins · 8.29 expected wins

Biggest Disappointment

Green Bay Packers

2.50 wins below expected

3 wins · 5.50 expected wins

Final Standings

Final regular season records. The vsSim column shows actual wins minus the simulation's mean wins - positive values indicate the team overachieved, negative values mean they underperformed.

# Team W L T Pct GB PF PA PD SimW vsSim
1 Philadelphia Eagles Division 9 2 1 .792 - 376 156 +220 8.51 +0.99
2 Washington Redskins 7 5 0 .583 2.5 291 287 +4 6.40 +0.60
3 Pittsburgh Steelers 4 8 0 .333 5.5 200 243 -43 5.38 -1.38
4 New York Giants 4 8 0 .333 5.5 297 388 -91 4.96 -0.96
5 Boston Yanks 3 9 0 .250 6.5 174 372 -198 2.79 +0.21
# Team W L T Pct GB PF PA PD SimW vsSim
1 Chicago Cardinals Division 11 1 0 .917 - 395 226 +169 8.29 +2.71
2 Chicago Bears 10 2 0 .833 1 375 151 +224 9.12 +0.88
3 Los Angeles Rams 6 5 1 .542 4.5 327 269 +58 6.13 +0.37
4 Green Bay Packers 3 9 0 .250 8 154 290 -136 5.50 -2.50
5 Detroit Lions 2 10 0 .167 9 200 407 -207 2.93 -0.93

Playoff Bracket

NFL Championship Game

Philadelphia Eagles 7
Chicago Cardinals 0

Dec 19

Season Summary

Every team's regular season finish compared against the simulated win totals. Click on any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual total minus the simulation's mean. Positive values indicate the team outperformed the expected total; negative values indicate the team was unluckier than expected. Percentile represents where their actual result fell in the simulated distribution.

Team Conference Division Elo Actual Avg. Wins Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Chicago Bears West 1793 10 9.12 +0.88 86.69% 2 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chicago Cardinals West 1792 11 8.29 +2.71 99.43% 1 6 7 8 9 10 12
Philadelphia Eagles East 1689 9.5 8.51 +0.99 78.20% 3 6 8 8 9 11 12
Los Angeles Rams West 1638 6.5 6.13 +0.37 61.56% 0 4 5 6 7 9 12
Washington Redskins East 1487 7 6.40 +0.60 77.86% 0 4 5 6 7 9 12
Pittsburgh Steelers East 1408 4 5.38 -1.38 30.70% 0 3 4 5 6 8 11
Boston Yanks East 1378 3 2.79 +0.21 72.83% 0 1 2 3 4 5 9
New York Giants East 1359 4 4.96 -0.96 41.49% 0 2 4 5 6 7 12
Detroit Lions West 1283 2 2.93 -0.93 41.00% 0 1 2 3 4 5 9
Green Bay Packers West 1173 3 5.50 -2.50 10.14% 0 3 4 5 6 8 11

Head-to-Head

Cells show each team's record against each opponent with the expected wins from the simulation below Gold-tinted cells indicate the team beat the model's expectations by more than a half-win while navy-tinted cells indicate they fell short by more than a half-win. The first table covers within-division games while the second covers games against teams outside the division.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Within East

Team Yanks Giants Eagles Steelers Redskins
Boston Yanks
0-2
(0.6 exp.)
1-1
(0.1 exp.)
1-1
(0.5 exp.)
0-2
(0.5 exp.)
New York Giants
2-0
(1.3 exp.)
0-2
(0.5 exp.)
1-1
(0.9 exp.)
0-2
(1.0 exp.)
Philadelphia Eagles
1-1
(1.9 exp.)
2-0
(1.5 exp.)
2-0
(1.7 exp.)
2-0
(1.2 exp.)
Pittsburgh Steelers
1-1
(1.4 exp.)
1-1
(1.1 exp.)
0-2
(0.3 exp.)
1-1
(0.9 exp.)
Washington Redskins
2-0
(1.5 exp.)
2-0
(1.0 exp.)
0-2
(0.7 exp.)
1-1
(1.1 exp.)

East vs. Outside Teams

Team Bears Cardinals Lions Packers Rams
Boston Yanks
0-1
(0.1 exp.)
0-1
(0.1 exp.)
1-0
(0.3 exp.)
0-1
(0.5 exp.)
-
New York Giants
0-1
(0.1 exp.)
0-1
(0.3 exp.)
-
1-0
(0.4 exp.)
0-1
(0.4 exp.)
Philadelphia Eagles
1-0
(0.5 exp.)
0-1
(0.4 exp.)
1-0
(0.9 exp.)
-
0-0-1
(0.3 exp.)
Pittsburgh Steelers
-
0-1
(0.3 exp.)
0-1
(0.6 exp.)
1-0
(0.6 exp.)
0-1
(0.2 exp.)
Washington Redskins
0-1
(0.2 exp.)
-
1-0
(0.9 exp.)
1-0
(0.3 exp.)
0-1
(0.6 exp.)

Within West

Team Bears Cardinals Lions Packers Rams
Chicago Bears
1-1
(1.2 exp.)
2-0
(1.9 exp.)
2-0
(1.3 exp.)
2-0
(1.5 exp.)
Chicago Cardinals
1-1
(0.7 exp.)
2-0
(1.8 exp.)
2-0
(1.4 exp.)
2-0
(1.4 exp.)
Detroit Lions
0-2
(0.1 exp.)
0-2
(0.2 exp.)
1-1
(0.6 exp.)
0-2
(0.7 exp.)
Green Bay Packers
0-2
(0.7 exp.)
0-2
(0.6 exp.)
1-1
(1.3 exp.)
1-1
(0.6 exp.)
Los Angeles Rams
0-2
(0.5 exp.)
0-2
(0.5 exp.)
2-0
(1.3 exp.)
1-1
(1.4 exp.)

West vs. Outside Teams

Team Yanks Giants Eagles Steelers Redskins
Chicago Bears
1-0
(0.9 exp.)
1-0
(0.9 exp.)
0-1
(0.5 exp.)
-
1-0
(0.8 exp.)
Chicago Cardinals
1-0
(0.9 exp.)
1-0
(0.7 exp.)
1-0
(0.6 exp.)
1-0
(0.7 exp.)
-
Detroit Lions
0-1
(0.7 exp.)
-
0-1
(0.1 exp.)
1-0
(0.4 exp.)
0-1
(0.1 exp.)
Green Bay Packers
1-0
(0.5 exp.)
0-1
(0.6 exp.)
-
0-1
(0.4 exp.)
0-1
(0.7 exp.)
Los Angeles Rams
-
1-0
(0.5 exp.)
0-0-1
(0.7 exp.)
1-0
(0.8 exp.)
1-0
(0.3 exp.)

Scoreline Distribution

Cells represent the percentage of games that ended with a team's points in the row and its opponent's points in the column. Cells below the diagonal are wins (gold), and cells above are losses (blue). Totals along the edges show the marginal percentages for that row or column.

Win Loss Same range
↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–60.83%1.67%0.83%1.67%3.33%8.33%
7–130.83%5.00%0.83%4.17%0.83%2.50%3.33%17.50%
14–201.67%0.83%5.00%2.50%3.33%2.50%2.50%18.33%
21–270.83%4.17%2.50%5.00%3.33%5.00%20.83%
28–341.67%0.83%3.33%3.33%1.67%0.83%11.67%
35–412.50%2.50%0.83%1.67%7.50%
42+3.33%3.33%2.50%5.00%1.67%15.83%
Total8.33%17.50%18.33%20.83%11.67%7.50%15.83%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 23.24 23.24 +0.00
SD 14.71 14.71 23.22
CV 0.63 0.63
Max 63 63 +46
Min 0 0 -46

Games Played: 60

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–68.33%8.33%16.67%
7–138.33%16.67%25.00%
14–208.33%8.33%8.33%8.33%33.33%
21–2716.67%16.67%
28–34
35–418.33%8.33%
42+
Total8.33%16.67%25.00%16.67%33.33%100%

Boston Yanks — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 14.50 31.00 -16.50
SD 10.67 16.50 19.84
CV 0.74 0.53
Max 37 59 +23
Min 0 7 -45

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–138.33%8.33%16.67%
14–20
21–278.33%8.33%16.67%
28–348.33%8.33%16.67%
35–418.33%8.33%
42+16.67%16.67%8.33%41.67%
Total25.00%25.00%33.33%16.67%100%

Chicago Bears — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 31.25 12.58 +18.67
SD 15.11 6.88 15.00
CV 0.48 0.55
Max 51 24 +38
Min 7 0 -5

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–13
14–208.33%8.33%16.67%
21–278.33%8.33%25.00%41.67%
28–348.33%8.33%
35–41
42+8.33%8.33%8.33%8.33%33.33%
Total25.00%25.00%33.33%8.33%8.33%100%

Chicago Cardinals — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 32.92 18.83 +14.08
SD 15.61 9.15 14.16
CV 0.47 0.49
Max 63 35 +36
Min 17 7 -11

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–68.33%8.33%
7–138.33%8.33%
14–2016.67%8.33%16.67%41.67%
21–278.33%16.67%16.67%41.67%
28–34
35–41
42+
Total25.00%33.33%41.67%100%

Detroit Lions — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 16.67 33.92 -17.25
SD 7.51 13.04 14.42
CV 0.45 0.38
Max 27 56 +4
Min 0 14 -37

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–68.33%8.33%16.67%
7–138.33%16.67%8.33%16.67%50.00%
14–208.33%8.33%16.67%
21–27
28–348.33%8.33%16.67%
35–41
42+
Total16.67%8.33%8.33%33.33%8.33%25.00%100%

Green Bay Packers — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 12.83 24.17 -11.33
SD 10.09 16.75 23.62
CV 0.79 0.69
Max 33 49 +31
Min 3 0 -46

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–68.33%8.33%16.67%
7–13
14–20
21–278.33%16.67%8.33%33.33%
28–348.33%8.33%8.33%25.00%
35–418.33%8.33%
42+8.33%8.33%16.67%
Total25.00%16.67%33.33%8.33%8.33%8.33%100%

Los Angeles Rams — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 27.25 22.42 +4.83
SD 14.85 10.81 18.06
CV 0.54 0.48
Max 52 42 +37
Min 0 7 -21

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–68.33%8.33%
7–138.33%8.33%
14–2016.67%16.67%
21–278.33%8.33%16.67%
28–348.33%8.33%8.33%25.00%
35–4116.67%16.67%
42+8.33%8.33%
Total8.33%8.33%8.33%8.33%8.33%33.33%25.00%100%

New York Giants — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 24.75 32.33 -7.58
SD 13.59 17.82 25.40
CV 0.55 0.55
Max 49 63 +46
Min 0 3 -45

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–138.33%8.33%
14–208.33%8.33%8.33%25.00%
21–27
28–348.33%8.33%16.67%
35–418.33%8.33%
42+25.00%16.67%41.67%
Total33.33%16.67%8.33%25.00%8.33%8.33%100%

Philadelphia Eagles — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 31.33 13.00 +18.33
SD 13.73 12.58 21.58
CV 0.44 0.97
Max 45 37 +45
Min 12 0 -23

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–68.33%8.33%
7–1316.67%8.33%8.33%33.33%
14–2016.67%8.33%25.00%
21–278.33%8.33%16.67%
28–34
35–418.33%8.33%16.67%
42+
Total25.00%33.33%8.33%33.33%100%

Pittsburgh Steelers — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 16.67 20.25 -3.58
SD 12.41 9.73 15.71
CV 0.74 0.48
Max 38 34 +31
Min 0 7 -27

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–68.33%8.33%
7–138.33%8.33%8.33%25.00%
14–208.33%8.33%
21–2716.67%8.33%25.00%
28–348.33%8.33%
35–418.33%8.33%
42+16.67%16.67%
Total33.33%8.33%25.00%8.33%25.00%100%

Washington Redskins — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 24.25 23.92 +0.33
SD 17.00 15.74 27.11
CV 0.70 0.66
Max 59 48 +38
Min 0 7 -45

Games Played: 12

Wins vs. Points Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Wins plotted against points scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in wins per 10 points).

Fit Metrics

Slope
Scored 0.83 +0.3
Allowed 0.66 -0.3
Differential 0.90 +0.2

Home-Field Advantage Edge

A measure of how well each team has taken advantage of home-field advantage during the season. For each team, sum the win probabilities for home games and compare against the team's actual performance at home. Repeat for games on the road. Positive values indicate the team has played comparatively better at home than on the road. Negative values indicate the team is not utilizing home field advantage.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

The teams that deviated the most from the simulated results.

Top Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 Chicago Cardinals 11 8.29 +2.71
2 Philadelphia Eagles 9.5 8.51 +0.99
3 Chicago Bears 10 9.12 +0.88
4 Washington Redskins 7 6.40 +0.60
5 Los Angeles Rams 6.5 6.13 +0.37

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 Green Bay Packers 3 5.50 -2.50
2 Pittsburgh Steelers 4 5.38 -1.38
3 New York Giants 4 4.96 -0.96
4 Detroit Lions 2 2.93 -0.93
5 Boston Yanks 3 2.79 +0.21

Top Streaks

The most unlikely streaks achieved by teams throughout the season according to the model's probabilities. Calculated by using the pregame win/tie/loss probabilities for all the games in each team's streak.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Chicago Cardinals 10 Oct 10 – Dec 12 1 in 48
2 Philadelphia Eagles 8 Oct 10 – Nov 28 1 in 16
3 Boston Yanks 2 Oct 9 – Oct 17 1 in 10
4 Washington Redskins 4 Oct 24 – Nov 14 1 in 7
5 Los Angeles Rams 3 Nov 28 – Dec 12 1 in 4

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Green Bay Packers 7 Oct 24 – Dec 5 1 in 56
2 Detroit Lions 5 Sep 22 – Oct 24 1 in 11
3 Pittsburgh Steelers 3 Oct 17 – Oct 31 1 in 10
4 Washington Redskins 3 Nov 21 – Dec 5 1 in 5
5 New York Giants 3 Oct 3 – Oct 17 1 in 4

Finish Position Heatmaps

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team finished in a given position in the simulation.

Team12345
Philadelphia Eagles73.27%19.86%5.55%1.24%0.08%
Washington Redskins16.91%39.97%26.07%13.92%3.14%
Pittsburgh Steelers5.75%22.86%34.06%27.95%9.38%
New York Giants3.95%15.63%27.89%37.13%15.41%
Boston Yanks0.13%1.69%6.43%19.76%71.99%
Team12345
Chicago Bears61.55%29.44%7.44%1.53%0.04%
Chicago Cardinals32.36%45.88%16.39%5.04%0.33%
Los Angeles Rams4.35%15.70%42.13%31.63%6.18%
Green Bay Packers1.71%8.69%30.84%47.58%11.18%
Detroit Lions0.02%0.29%3.19%14.22%82.27%
Team12345678910
Chicago Bears44.84%24.71%17.63%7.12%3.69%1.31%0.55%0.13%0.01%<0.01%
Philadelphia Eagles24.82%34.78%17.69%12.90%5.22%2.97%1.11%0.43%0.07%<0.01%
Chicago Cardinals23.09%20.89%26.22%13.81%8.49%4.30%2.15%0.83%0.17%0.04%
Washington Redskins2.92%8.52%12.31%21.87%16.26%15.67%10.51%8.06%2.89%1.01%
Los Angeles Rams2.53%4.33%10.59%13.32%21.67%17.03%15.75%9.39%4.11%1.27%
Pittsburgh Steelers0.64%2.84%5.42%12.46%13.81%19.40%16.52%16.99%7.58%4.34%
Green Bay Packers0.71%1.87%5.97%9.16%16.87%17.48%21.56%15.63%7.07%3.69%
New York Giants0.44%1.99%3.87%8.36%11.12%15.68%17.86%22.45%11.83%6.40%
Detroit Lions<0.01%0.03%0.14%0.36%1.44%2.71%7.10%12.34%39.45%36.43%
Boston Yanks<0.01%0.04%0.16%0.66%1.43%3.46%6.89%13.73%26.82%46.82%

Win Totals in Context

How each team's actual results compared to their simulated results, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Click a division name in the legend to toggle it on or off.

Playoff Seed Probabilities

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team earned a given playoff seed in the simulation. Teams are sorted by likelihood of earning the top seed. Teams that missed the playoffs more often sit toward the bottom.

Team1 SeedMissed Playoffs
Philadelphia Eagles73.27%26.73%
Washington Redskins16.91%83.09%
Pittsburgh Steelers5.75%94.25%
New York Giants3.95%96.05%
Boston Yanks0.13%99.87%
Team1 SeedMissed Playoffs
Chicago Bears61.55%38.45%
Chicago Cardinals32.36%67.64%
Los Angeles Rams4.35%95.65%
Green Bay Packers1.71%98.28%
Detroit Lions0.02%99.98%

Wins Required to Clinch Each Seed

The empirical cumulative distribution that shows the probability that a team earning that seed finished the regular season with at most a given number of wins. The point where each line passes through 50% is roughly the median wins for that seed.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Percentage of games won by the home team - percentage of games won by the away team
No Edge: under 2% · Slight Edge: 2% to 6% · Clear Edge: 6% to 10% · Fortress: 10% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points that 1 point is worth. A team this many Elo ratings points better than another would be expected to defeat their opponent by 1 point at a neutral location.
Scoring Tilt
Average home points - average away points per game. The gold line represents the expected home points edge according to the scoring value of a point of Elo and the number of Elo rating points home advantage is worth.
Road-Tilted: under -3.2 · Lean Road: -3.2 to 0 · Lean Home: 0 to 3.2 · Home-Tilted: 3.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeTieAway
+18.33%
Fortress
58.33%1.67%40.00%
Elo Value
Home Edge: 64.42 Elo pts.
20 Elo
0.050 points per Elo point
050
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+3.08 points
Lean Home
-8+3.23+8

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of preseason title contenders. Calculated by taking 1 divided by the sum of squared preseason title odds. Higher numbers indicate more parity in the league while 1 indicates that the preseason favorite is a near-lock.
Front-Runner: under 2 · Few Contenders: 2 to 4 · Open Race: 4 to 8 · Wide Open: 8 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would win the title based on the simulated results. Location of the dot marks their rank across all teams, ranging from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st · Among the Favorites: 2nd · Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 5th · Longshot: 6th or lower.
Title Run Odds
Given that actual playoff bracket, the probability that the champion would win the exact series/games they faced in reality. The gold line represents their odds of winning if every series/game was a toss-up.
Long Shot: under 25% · Tough Road: 25% to 50% · Favored: 50% to 100% · Heavy Favorite: 100% and up.
Title-Race Openness
3.2
Few Contenders
124810
Champion Preseason Odds
34%
Philadelphia Eagles, 2nd of 10
LongshotFavorite
Title Run Odds
Coin-flip
44.5%
Tough Road
050.00%100%

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Average standard deviation of the difference between each team's actual wins total and their simulated average wins total. The gold line is the standard deviation the model expected from random chance alone.
Subdued: under 1.17 · As Expected: 1.17 to 1.61 · Elevated: 1.61 to 2.19 · High Variance: 2.19 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap in the rank of the final standings between where each team finished in the standings and where the model projected them to finish.
Pinpoint: under 1.1 · Close: 1.1 to 1.49 · Off Target: 1.49 to 1.94 · Well Off Target: 1.94 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team whose record finished in the highest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the top team in a league of 10 teams typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team whose record finished in the lowest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the bottom team in a league of 10 teams typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished either above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile. Even with a well-calibrated model, 10% of teams are expected to land in the extremes of their distributions.
Minimal Outliers: under 0.5 · As Expected: 0.5 to 1.2 · Several Outliers: 1.2 to 2.2 · Many Outliers: 2.2 and up.
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Number of teams that actually made the playoffs but were not in the model's projected field.The gold line represents how many playoff teams the simulation missed on average.
Fewer Than Expected: under 0.49 · As Expected: 0.49 to 0.81 · More Than Expected: 0.81 to 1.3 · Far More Than Expected: 1.3 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
1.40 wins
As Expected
01.464
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.10
Close
01.293
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.00%
99.43%
Chicago Cardinals
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 5.00%
10.14%
Green Bay Packers
050
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 10
As Expected
01.010
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Expected
1 of 2
More Than Expected
00.72

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
Measures how evenly wins were distributed across the league. Lower scores indicate there was less variability across the actual wins totals .Higher scores are an indication of more imbalance in the league with a few unusually strong or unusually weak teams.
Highly Balanced: under 0.08 · Balanced: 0.08 to 0.15 · Top-Heavy: 0.15 to 0.24 · Concentrated: 0.24 and up.
Noll-Scully
Measures how more times spread out the final standings were in reality compared to standings that were generated by flipping a coin for each game. The gold line at 1 indicates as much variability in the standings as s coin flip. Above it, talent gaps in team composition stretched the standings more than the variability produced by luck alone. Below it, the league was more competitive than coin flips alone would yield.
Compressed: under 0.9 · Coin-Flip Spread: 0.9 to 1.15 · Moderate Separation: 1.15 to 1.45 · Stratified: 1.45 and up.
Interquartile Edge
The probability that the team in the 75th percentile of the league's Elo ratings would defeat the team in the 25th percentile at a neutral site. The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league.
Even: under 58% · Competitive: 58% to 65% · Tilted: 65% to 73% · Lopsided: 73% and up.
Best vs. Worst
The probability that the team with the highest Elo rating would defeat the team with the lowest Elo rating at a neutral site.The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league. The gold line represents how high this probability is expected to be in a league of this size. A blue dot to the right indicates an unusually dominant team or an unusually weak team.
Tight: under 65% · Clear Edge: 65% to 78% · Lopsided: 78% to 88% · No Contest: 88% and up.
Close Games
Actual percentage of games decided by 3 run/points or fewer. The gold line indicates the proportion of close games you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Mostly Decisive: under 25% · Some Drama: 25% to 38% · Often Close: 38% to 50% · Nail-Biters: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Actual percentage of games decided by 17 runs/points or more. The gold line indicates the proportion of blowouts you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Rare: under 10% · Occasional: 10% to 20% · Frequent: 20% to 30% · Routine: 30% and up.
Gini Index
0.29
Concentrated
00.080.150.240.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.26
Moderate Separation
01.003
Interquartile Edge
86%
Lopsided
50%58%65%73%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 98%
97%
No Contest
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
13%
Mostly Decisive
0%12%100%
Blowouts
Expected
52%
Routine
0%48%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame win probabilities aligned with the actual game result, averaged over the entire season. Picks that were both confident and correct are rewarded the most, while incorrect predictions and/or uncertain predictions are penalized more. Lower scores are better. 0 indicates every game was perfectly predicted with maximum confidence. For sports with where wins and losses are the only outcomes, Brier scores less than 0.25 indicate the model did better than random predictions. For sports where ties are possible, 0.67 is the cutoff for which the Brier score must be lower to beat random predictions. The lower the Brier score, the easier and more accurately the games were to predict.
Highly Predictable: under 0.18 · Predictable: 0.18 to 0.22 · Hard to Predict: 0.22 to 0.25 · Coin-Flip: 0.25 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, calculated by averaging the difference in the win probabilities divided by the sum of the win probabilities. Lower scores indicate more parity in the league. 0 indicates that every game was a 50-50 toss-up between evenly matched teams. 1 means every game pitted a heavy favorite against a huge underdog.
Evenly Matched: under 0.12 · Slight Separation: 0.12 to 0.22 · Wide Gaps: 0.22 to 0.34 · Lopsided: 0.34 and up.
Strangeness
How extreme the actual final standings were compared to what the model expected. A value of 0 would indicate that the simulated results perfectly matched the actual standings. A score of 1 indicates that the actual results were scattered around the projections by exactly the variance the model predicted. (i.e. The projections missed the actual standings by 1 standard deviation on average. Scores larger than 1 mean the season was wilder to forecast with more overperforming and underperforming teams than expected. Scores less than 1 indicate the season was more predictable.
Tighter Than Modeled: under 0.85 · As Expected: 0.85 to 1.15 · Volatile: 1.15 to 1.5 · Chaotic: 1.5 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the order of the final standings aligned with the ranked preseason Elo ratings as calculated by the Spearman rank correlation. Larger values indicate that the preseason Elo ratings were a strong predictor of the team's final rank in the standings while values near 0 mean.
Reshuffled: under 0.3 · Weak Alignment: 0.3 to 0.6 · Strong Alignment: 0.6 to 0.85 · Closely Aligned: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality. The gold line measures how often the model expected the underdog to win when considering the outcome probabilities. A blue dot to the right of the gold line means upsets were more prevalent than left. A dot to the left indicates that favorites won more often than expected.
Chalk Held: under 30% · As Expected: 30% to 40% · Upset-Prone: 40% to 46% · Bedlam: 46% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality, but only including games with a clear favorite, one at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside. This metrics ignores games that could be considered toss-ups. The gold line is how often the model expected these heavy favorites to lose. A dot to the right means the big favorites were upset more than expected; to the left means they took care of business.
Favorites Held: under 22% · As Expected: 22% to 32% · Shaky Favorites: 32% to 42% · Bedlam: 42% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.17
Highly Predictable
00.181
Matchup Imbalance
0.46
Lopsided
00.120.220.340.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.92
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.79
Strong Alignment
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
30%
As Expected
0%27%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
24%
As Expected
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Games are sorted into bins according to how confident the model was. Within each bin, the predicted number of wins, losses, and ties are compared against the actual counts. The p-value of this test is plotted below. Values above 0.05 indicate that the model's probabilities are well-calibrated for the season.
Clear Misfit: under 0.01 · Misfit: 0.01 to 0.05 · Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 · Well Calibrated: 0.1 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the model's probabilities is correct. Each probability is turned into their log-odds. A line is fit that predicts the actual results from the log-odds. The slope of this line is the calibration slope.A slope of 1.00 is perfect, indicating that the model's confidence matches the actual outcomes of the games. Slopes less than 1.00 indicate overconfidence. The model assigned higher probabilities to the favorites than was appropriate given the matchup, causing more losses by favored teams. Slopes greater than 1.00 indicate under-confidence. The model is more uncertain about too many results, assigning them lower probabilities when in reality the favorites should have had higher probabilities.
Overconfident: under 0.85 · Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 · Underconfident: 1.15 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
Calibration error (ECE) checks whether the model's probabilities mean what they say. ECE is calculated as the average weighted gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted outcome actually occurred. The smaller the ECE, the more confident we are about the model's probabilities. The gold line represents the noise ceiling, which is the amount of error that luck can produce on its own even if the probabilities are perfectly calibrated. Values below the noise ceiling indicate that the model's error is no larger than chance alone would produce. Values above the noice ceiling point to a genuine calibration issue since the error is larger than luck could explain.
Well Within Noise: under 0.09 · Within Noise: 0.09 to 0.19 · Above Noise: 0.19 to 0.37 · Well Above Noise: 0.37 and up.
Probability calibration
0.64
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.11
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.05
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.141
Within Noise
00.1860.5

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual wins, simulated final wins, playoff probability, and division-title probability - day by day. Select a division to see all five charts for its teams.

Elo Through the Playoffs

How each playoff team's Elo rating evolved as the postseason unfolded. Elo Progression traces each team's game-by-game Elo rating through their playoff run. Net Elo Change summarizes the difference in Elo rating between the beginning and end of the playoffs for each team.

Stochastic Playoff Outcomes

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Made Playoffs Won Super Bowl
Chicago Bears 61.55% 38.73%
Philadelphia Eagles 73.27% 34.07%
Chicago Cardinals 32.36% 20.22%
Washington Redskins 16.91% 3.68%
Los Angeles Rams 4.35% 1.77%
Pittsburgh Steelers 5.75% 0.91%
New York Giants 3.95% 0.50%
Green Bay Packers 1.71% 0.10%
Boston Yanks 0.13% 0.02%
Detroit Lions 0.02% <0.01%
Loser →
↓ Winner
Chicago BearsChicago CardinalsDetroit LionsGreen Bay PackersLos Angeles RamsBoston YanksNew York GiantsPhiladelphia EaglesPittsburgh SteelersWashington Redskins
Boston Yanks11.8%0.08%14.3%0.03%100.0%<0.01%0.0%<0.01%
New York Giants11.7%2.62%11.0%1.15%0.0%<0.01%80.0%0.03%27.0%0.14%
Philadelphia Eagles44.3%44.79%44.8%23.63%100.0%0.02%96.3%1.42%66.4%3.40%
Pittsburgh Steelers14.9%3.95%13.3%1.51%100.0%<0.01%78.6%0.06%31.2%0.23%
Washington Redskins20.5%10.10%20.3%6.03%66.7%<0.01%86.4%0.20%38.2%0.57%
Chicago Bears88.2%0.08%88.3%2.62%55.7%44.79%85.1%3.95%79.5%10.10%
Chicago Cardinals85.7%0.03%89.0%1.15%55.2%23.63%86.7%1.51%79.7%6.03%
Detroit Lions100.0%<0.01%0.0%0.02%0.0%<0.01%33.3%<0.01%
Green Bay Packers0.0%<0.01%20.0%0.03%3.7%1.42%21.4%0.06%13.6%0.20%
Los Angeles Rams100.0%<0.01%73.0%0.14%33.6%3.40%68.8%0.23%61.8%0.57%

Actual Bracket Simulation

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Won Super Bowl
Chicago Cardinals 55.47%
Philadelphia Eagles 44.53%
Loser →
↓ Winner
Chicago CardinalsPhiladelphia Eagles
Philadelphia Eagles44.5%100.00%
Chicago Cardinals55.5%100.00%

Most-Likely Championship Paths

For each playoff team, what was the most likely path they had to the championship across all simulations? Tiles represent the opponent they faced and defeated the most often in each round.

Chicago Cardinals 55.47% chance to win
Super Bowl
vs. Philadelphia Eagles
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
55.47%
Philadelphia Eagles 44.53% chance to win
Super Bowl
vs. Chicago Cardinals
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
44.53%

Regular Season Games

Summary of every regular-season game played this season.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1948-09-17 Green Bay Packers L 0-31 1454.11 1524.39 48.22% 49.91% -84.60 0-1
1948-09-23 New York Giants L 7-27 1369.51 1473.72 43.39% 54.77% -61.24 0-2
1948-10-03 @ Pittsburgh Steelers L 14-24 1308.27 1468.72 21.07% 77.62% -21.02 0-3
1948-10-09 @ Detroit Lions W 17-14 1287.25 1354.85 31.15% 67.20% +36.48 1-3
1948-10-17 Pittsburgh Steelers W 13-7 1323.73 1518.28 31.38% 66.96% +51.40 2-3
1948-10-24 @ Chicago Cardinals L 27-49 1375.13 1633.66 13.26% 85.79% -19.54 2-4
1948-10-31 @ Washington Redskins L 21-59 1355.59 1520.29 20.67% 78.03% -40.21 2-5
1948-11-07 Washington Redskins L 7-23 1315.38 1560.49 25.54% 72.97% -32.28 2-6
1948-11-14 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 0-45 1283.10 1775.05 3.88% 95.78% -8.10 2-7
1948-11-21 Chicago Bears L 17-51 1275.00 1772.03 7.57% 91.83% -13.80 2-8
1948-11-28 @ New York Giants L 14-28 1261.20 1427.21 20.54% 78.16% -24.25 2-9
1948-12-05 Philadelphia Eagles W 37-14 1236.95 1819.36 4.79% 94.81% +141.08 3-9
1948-09-26 @ Green Bay Packers W 45-7 1554.56 1608.99 32.78% 65.53% +126.64 1-0
1948-10-04 @ Chicago Cardinals W 28-17 1681.20 1570.41 55.70% 42.46% +44.46 2-0
1948-10-10 Los Angeles Rams W 42-21 1725.66 1571.03 77.04% 21.62% +31.28 3-0
1948-10-17 Detroit Lions W 28-0 1756.94 1318.37 94.37% 5.19% +8.56 4-0
1948-10-24 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 7-12 1765.50 1688.09 50.93% 47.20% -35.85 4-1
1948-10-31 New York Giants W 35-14 1729.65 1380.85 90.97% 8.38% +12.02 5-1
1948-11-07 @ Los Angeles Rams W 21-6 1741.67 1477.71 75.03% 23.56% +28.82 6-1
1948-11-14 Green Bay Packers W 7-6 1770.49 1322.97 94.64% 4.95% +1.54 7-1
1948-11-21 @ Boston Yanks W 51-17 1772.03 1275.00 91.83% 7.57% +13.79 8-1
1948-11-28 Washington Redskins W 48-13 1785.82 1581.85 81.60% 17.25% +32.15 9-1
1948-12-05 @ Detroit Lions W 42-14 1817.97 1305.38 92.47% 6.97% +11.53 10-1
1948-12-12 Chicago Cardinals L 21-24 1829.50 1755.22 68.03% 30.34% -36.93 10-2
1948-09-24 Philadelphia Eagles W 21-14 1537.96 1529.61 59.38% 38.82% +32.45 1-0
1948-10-04 Chicago Bears L 17-28 1570.41 1681.20 42.46% 55.70% -44.46 1-1
1948-10-10 @ Green Bay Packers W 17-7 1525.95 1512.63 41.80% 56.36% +56.01 2-1
1948-10-17 @ New York Giants W 63-35 1581.96 1383.45 67.46% 30.90% +51.70 3-1
1948-10-24 Boston Yanks W 49-27 1633.66 1375.13 85.79% 13.26% +19.54 4-1
1948-10-31 @ Los Angeles Rams W 27-22 1653.20 1504.00 61.03% 37.20% +26.29 5-1
1948-11-07 Detroit Lions W 56-20 1679.49 1319.11 91.49% 7.89% +14.80 6-1
1948-11-14 @ Pittsburgh Steelers W 24-7 1694.29 1458.42 71.93% 26.55% +34.60 7-1
1948-11-21 Los Angeles Rams W 27-24 1728.89 1502.78 83.41% 15.53% +8.47 8-1
1948-11-25 @ Detroit Lions W 28-14 1737.36 1318.70 87.82% 11.34% +13.31 9-1
1948-12-05 Green Bay Packers W 42-7 1750.67 1177.67 97.30% 2.48% +4.55 10-1
1948-12-12 @ Chicago Bears W 24-21 1755.22 1829.50 30.34% 68.03% +36.92 11-1
1948-09-22 @ Los Angeles Rams L 7-44 1444.40 1514.73 30.82% 67.54% -59.27 0-1
1948-10-03 @ Green Bay Packers L 21-33 1385.13 1482.34 27.65% 70.79% -30.28 0-2
1948-10-09 Boston Yanks L 14-17 1354.85 1287.25 67.20% 31.15% -36.48 0-3
1948-10-17 @ Chicago Bears L 0-28 1318.37 1756.94 5.19% 94.37% -8.57 0-4
1948-10-24 Los Angeles Rams L 27-34 1309.80 1474.60 35.14% 63.12% -29.39 0-5
1948-10-31 Green Bay Packers W 24-20 1280.41 1434.30 36.57% 61.66% +38.70 1-5
1948-11-07 @ Chicago Cardinals L 20-56 1319.11 1679.49 7.89% 91.49% -14.80 1-6
1948-11-14 @ Washington Redskins L 21-46 1304.31 1592.78 11.42% 87.74% -17.92 1-7
1948-11-21 Pittsburgh Steelers W 17-14 1286.39 1423.82 38.78% 59.42% +32.31 2-7
1948-11-25 Chicago Cardinals L 14-28 1318.70 1737.36 11.34% 87.82% -13.32 2-8
1948-12-05 Chicago Bears L 14-42 1305.38 1817.97 6.97% 92.47% -11.52 2-9
1948-12-12 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 21-45 1293.86 1678.28 6.95% 92.50% -10.63 2-10
1948-09-17 @ Boston Yanks W 31-0 1524.39 1454.11 49.91% 48.22% +84.60 1-0
1948-09-26 Chicago Bears L 7-45 1608.99 1554.56 65.53% 32.78% -126.65 1-1
1948-10-03 Detroit Lions W 33-21 1482.34 1385.13 70.79% 27.65% +30.29 2-1
1948-10-10 Chicago Cardinals L 7-17 1512.63 1525.95 56.36% 41.80% -56.01 2-2
1948-10-17 Los Angeles Rams W 16-0 1456.62 1539.75 46.38% 51.75% +65.14 3-2
1948-10-24 Washington Redskins L 7-23 1521.76 1432.82 69.81% 28.60% -87.46 3-3
1948-10-31 @ Detroit Lions L 20-24 1434.30 1280.41 61.66% 36.57% -38.70 3-4
1948-11-07 @ Pittsburgh Steelers L 7-38 1395.60 1385.78 41.31% 56.86% -72.63 3-5
1948-11-14 @ Chicago Bears L 6-7 1322.97 1770.49 4.95% 94.64% -1.55 3-6
1948-11-21 New York Giants L 3-49 1321.42 1295.82 61.73% 36.50% -131.38 3-7
1948-11-28 @ Los Angeles Rams L 10-24 1190.04 1494.31 10.54% 88.67% -12.37 3-8
1948-12-05 @ Chicago Cardinals L 7-42 1177.67 1750.67 2.48% 97.30% -4.55 3-9
1948-09-22 Detroit Lions W 44-7 1514.73 1444.40 67.54% 30.82% +59.28 1-0
1948-10-03 Philadelphia Eagles T 28-28 1574.01 1497.16 68.35% 30.03% -2.98 1-0
1948-10-10 @ Chicago Bears L 21-42 1571.03 1725.66 21.62% 77.04% -31.28 1-1
1948-10-17 @ Green Bay Packers L 0-16 1539.75 1456.62 51.75% 46.38% -65.15 1-2
1948-10-24 @ Detroit Lions W 34-27 1474.60 1309.80 63.12% 35.14% +29.40 2-2
1948-10-31 Chicago Cardinals L 22-27 1504.00 1653.20 37.20% 61.03% -26.29 2-3
1948-11-07 Chicago Bears L 6-21 1477.71 1741.67 23.56% 75.03% -28.82 2-4
1948-11-14 @ New York Giants W 52-37 1448.89 1349.71 54.05% 44.10% +53.89 3-4
1948-11-21 @ Chicago Cardinals L 24-27 1502.78 1728.89 15.53% 83.41% -8.47 3-5
1948-11-28 Green Bay Packers W 24-10 1494.31 1190.04 88.67% 10.54% +12.37 4-5
1948-12-05 @ Washington Redskins W 41-13 1506.68 1549.70 34.23% 64.05% +106.29 5-5
1948-12-12 Pittsburgh Steelers W 31-14 1612.97 1433.42 79.44% 19.32% +25.13 6-5
1948-09-23 @ Boston Yanks W 27-7 1473.72 1369.51 54.77% 43.39% +61.24 1-0
1948-10-03 @ Washington Redskins L 10-41 1534.96 1497.80 45.16% 52.98% -79.31 1-1
1948-10-10 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 0-45 1455.65 1500.14 34.04% 64.24% -72.20 1-2
1948-10-17 Chicago Cardinals L 35-63 1383.45 1581.96 30.90% 67.46% -51.70 1-3
1948-10-24 Pittsburgh Steelers W 34-27 1331.75 1466.87 39.10% 59.10% +49.10 2-3
1948-10-31 @ Chicago Bears L 14-35 1380.85 1729.65 8.38% 90.97% -12.01 2-4
1948-11-07 Philadelphia Eagles L 14-35 1368.84 1755.93 13.28% 85.77% -19.13 2-5
1948-11-14 Los Angeles Rams L 37-52 1349.71 1448.89 44.10% 54.05% -53.89 2-6
1948-11-21 @ Green Bay Packers W 49-3 1295.82 1321.42 36.50% 61.73% +131.39 3-6
1948-11-28 Boston Yanks W 28-14 1427.21 1261.20 78.16% 20.54% +24.26 4-6
1948-12-05 @ Pittsburgh Steelers L 28-38 1451.47 1384.14 49.48% 48.65% -49.28 4-7
1948-12-12 Washington Redskins L 21-28 1402.19 1443.41 52.40% 45.74% -43.62 4-8
1948-09-24 @ Chicago Cardinals L 14-21 1529.61 1537.96 38.82% 59.38% -32.45 0-1
1948-10-03 @ Los Angeles Rams T 28-28 1497.16 1574.01 30.03% 68.35% +2.98 0-1
1948-10-10 New York Giants W 45-0 1500.14 1455.65 64.24% 34.04% +72.20 1-1
1948-10-17 @ Washington Redskins W 45-0 1572.34 1548.58 43.26% 54.89% +115.75 2-1
1948-10-24 Chicago Bears W 12-7 1688.09 1765.50 47.20% 50.93% +35.85 3-1
1948-10-31 @ Pittsburgh Steelers W 34-7 1723.94 1417.77 79.23% 19.51% +31.99 4-1
1948-11-07 @ New York Giants W 35-14 1755.93 1368.84 85.77% 13.28% +19.12 5-1
1948-11-14 Boston Yanks W 45-0 1775.05 1283.10 95.78% 3.88% +8.10 6-1
1948-11-21 Washington Redskins W 42-21 1783.15 1610.70 78.77% 19.95% +28.85 7-1
1948-11-28 Pittsburgh Steelers W 17-0 1812.00 1391.50 93.80% 5.73% +7.36 8-1
1948-12-05 @ Boston Yanks L 14-37 1819.36 1236.95 94.81% 4.79% -141.08 8-2
1948-12-12 Detroit Lions W 45-21 1678.28 1293.86 92.50% 6.95% +10.63 9-2
1948-09-26 @ Washington Redskins L 14-17 1491.87 1474.64 42.35% 55.81% -23.15 0-1
1948-10-03 Boston Yanks W 24-14 1468.72 1308.27 77.62% 21.07% +21.02 1-1
1948-10-10 Washington Redskins W 10-7 1489.74 1577.11 45.77% 52.36% +28.54 2-1
1948-10-17 @ Boston Yanks L 7-13 1518.28 1323.73 66.96% 31.38% -51.41 2-2
1948-10-24 @ New York Giants L 27-34 1466.87 1331.75 59.10% 39.10% -49.10 2-3
1948-10-31 Philadelphia Eagles L 7-34 1417.77 1723.94 19.51% 79.23% -31.99 2-4
1948-11-07 Green Bay Packers W 38-7 1385.78 1395.60 56.86% 41.31% +72.64 3-4
1948-11-14 Chicago Cardinals L 7-24 1458.42 1694.29 26.55% 71.93% -34.60 3-5
1948-11-21 @ Detroit Lions L 14-17 1423.82 1286.39 59.42% 38.78% -32.32 3-6
1948-11-28 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 0-17 1391.50 1812.00 5.73% 93.80% -7.36 3-7
1948-12-05 New York Giants W 38-28 1384.14 1451.47 48.65% 49.48% +49.28 4-7
1948-12-12 @ Los Angeles Rams L 14-31 1433.42 1612.97 19.32% 79.44% -25.12 4-8
1948-09-26 Pittsburgh Steelers W 17-14 1474.64 1491.87 55.81% 42.35% +23.16 1-0
1948-10-03 New York Giants W 41-10 1497.80 1534.96 52.98% 45.16% +79.31 2-0
1948-10-10 @ Pittsburgh Steelers L 7-10 1577.11 1489.74 52.36% 45.77% -28.53 2-1
1948-10-17 Philadelphia Eagles L 0-45 1548.58 1572.34 54.89% 43.26% -115.76 2-2
1948-10-24 @ Green Bay Packers W 23-7 1432.82 1521.76 28.60% 69.81% +87.47 3-2
1948-10-31 Boston Yanks W 59-21 1520.29 1355.59 78.03% 20.67% +40.20 4-2
1948-11-07 @ Boston Yanks W 23-7 1560.49 1315.38 72.97% 25.54% +32.29 5-2
1948-11-14 Detroit Lions W 46-21 1592.78 1304.31 87.74% 11.42% +17.92 6-2
1948-11-21 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 21-42 1610.70 1783.15 19.95% 78.77% -28.85 6-3
1948-11-28 @ Chicago Bears L 13-48 1581.85 1785.82 17.25% 81.60% -32.15 6-4
1948-12-05 Los Angeles Rams L 13-41 1549.70 1506.68 64.05% 34.23% -106.29 6-5
1948-12-12 @ New York Giants W 28-21 1443.41 1402.19 45.74% 52.40% +43.61 7-5

Playoff Games

Every playoff game from the selected team's perspective.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1948-12-19 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 0-7 1792.14 1688.91 55.56% 44.44% -45.44 0-1
1948-12-19 Chicago Cardinals W 7-0 1688.91 1792.14 44.44% 55.56% +45.44 1-0

Biggest Upsets

The 25 biggest upsets of the seasons, ranked by lowest pregame win probability. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1948-12-05 4.79% @ Boston Yanks 1236.95 37 Philadelphia Eagles 1819.36 14
2 1948-10-24 28.60% Washington Redskins 1432.82 23 @ Green Bay Packers 1521.76 7
3 1948-12-12 30.34% Chicago Cardinals 1755.22 24 @ Chicago Bears 1829.50 21
4 1948-10-09 31.15% Boston Yanks 1287.25 17 @ Detroit Lions 1354.85 14
5 1948-10-17 31.38% @ Boston Yanks 1323.73 13 Pittsburgh Steelers 1518.28 7
6 1948-09-26 32.78% Chicago Bears 1554.56 45 @ Green Bay Packers 1608.99 7
7 1948-12-05 34.23% Los Angeles Rams 1506.68 41 @ Washington Redskins 1549.70 13
8 1948-11-21 36.50% New York Giants 1295.82 49 @ Green Bay Packers 1321.42 3
9 1948-10-31 36.57% @ Detroit Lions 1280.41 24 Green Bay Packers 1434.30 20
10 1948-11-21 38.78% @ Detroit Lions 1286.39 17 Pittsburgh Steelers 1423.82 14
11 1948-10-24 39.10% @ New York Giants 1331.75 34 Pittsburgh Steelers 1466.87 27
12 1948-10-10 41.80% Chicago Cardinals 1525.95 17 @ Green Bay Packers 1512.63 7
13 1948-10-17 43.26% Philadelphia Eagles 1572.34 45 @ Washington Redskins 1548.58 0
14 1948-12-19 * 44.44% @ Philadelphia Eagles 1688.91 7 Chicago Cardinals 1792.14 0
15 1948-12-12 45.74% Washington Redskins 1443.41 28 @ New York Giants 1402.19 21
16 1948-10-10 45.77% @ Pittsburgh Steelers 1489.74 10 Washington Redskins 1577.11 7
17 1948-10-17 46.38% @ Green Bay Packers 1456.62 16 Los Angeles Rams 1539.75 0
18 1948-10-24 47.20% @ Philadelphia Eagles 1688.09 12 Chicago Bears 1765.50 7
19 1948-12-05 48.65% @ Pittsburgh Steelers 1384.14 38 New York Giants 1451.47 28

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1948-12-05 141.08 @ Boston Yanks 37 1236.95 4.79% Philadelphia Eagles 14 1819.36 94.81%
2 1948-11-21 131.39 New York Giants 49 1295.82 36.50% @ Green Bay Packers 3 1321.42 61.73%
3 1948-09-26 126.65 Chicago Bears 45 1554.56 32.78% @ Green Bay Packers 7 1608.99 65.53%
4 1948-10-17 115.76 Philadelphia Eagles 45 1572.34 43.26% @ Washington Redskins 0 1548.58 54.89%
5 1948-12-05 106.29 Los Angeles Rams 41 1506.68 34.23% @ Washington Redskins 13 1549.70 64.05%
6 1948-10-24 87.47 Washington Redskins 23 1432.82 28.60% @ Green Bay Packers 7 1521.76 69.81%
7 1948-09-17 84.60 Green Bay Packers 31 1524.39 49.91% @ Boston Yanks 0 1454.11 48.22%
8 1948-10-03 79.31 @ Washington Redskins 41 1497.80 52.98% New York Giants 10 1534.96 45.16%
9 1948-11-07 72.64 @ Pittsburgh Steelers 38 1385.78 56.86% Green Bay Packers 7 1395.60 41.31%
10 1948-10-10 72.20 @ Philadelphia Eagles 45 1500.14 64.24% New York Giants 0 1455.65 34.04%
11 1948-10-17 65.15 @ Green Bay Packers 16 1456.62 46.38% Los Angeles Rams 0 1539.75 51.75%
12 1948-09-23 61.24 New York Giants 27 1473.72 54.77% @ Boston Yanks 7 1369.51 43.39%
13 1948-09-22 59.28 @ Los Angeles Rams 44 1514.73 67.54% Detroit Lions 7 1444.40 30.82%
14 1948-10-10 56.01 Chicago Cardinals 17 1525.95 41.80% @ Green Bay Packers 7 1512.63 56.36%
15 1948-11-14 53.89 Los Angeles Rams 52 1448.89 54.05% @ New York Giants 37 1349.71 44.10%
16 1948-10-17 51.70 Chicago Cardinals 63 1581.96 67.46% @ New York Giants 35 1383.45 30.90%
17 1948-10-17 51.41 @ Boston Yanks 13 1323.73 31.38% Pittsburgh Steelers 7 1518.28 66.96%
18 1948-12-05 49.28 @ Pittsburgh Steelers 38 1384.14 48.65% New York Giants 28 1451.47 49.48%
19 1948-10-24 49.10 @ New York Giants 34 1331.75 39.10% Pittsburgh Steelers 27 1466.87 59.10%
20 1948-12-19 * 45.44 @ Philadelphia Eagles 7 1688.91 44.44% Chicago Cardinals 0 1792.14 55.56%
21 1948-10-04 44.46 Chicago Bears 28 1681.20 55.70% @ Chicago Cardinals 17 1570.41 42.46%
22 1948-12-12 43.62 Washington Redskins 28 1443.41 45.74% @ New York Giants 21 1402.19 52.40%
23 1948-10-31 40.21 @ Washington Redskins 59 1520.29 78.03% Boston Yanks 21 1355.59 20.67%
24 1948-10-31 38.70 @ Detroit Lions 24 1280.41 36.57% Green Bay Packers 20 1434.30 61.66%
25 1948-12-12 36.93 Chicago Cardinals 24 1755.22 30.34% @ Chicago Bears 21 1829.50 68.03%