Home / Leagues / NFL / 1944

1944 NFL Season

50 regular-season games · 2 playoff teams

Final

Champion

Green Bay Packers

6th Title

Last Title: 1939

Runner-Up

New York Giants

7th Appearance

Last Appearance: 1941

Biggest Overachiever

Philadelphia Eagles

1.73 wins above expected

7 wins · 6.27 expected wins

Biggest Disappointment

Brooklyn Tigers

2.33 wins below expected

0 wins · 2.33 expected wins

Final Standings

Final regular season records. The vsSim column shows actual wins minus the simulation's mean wins - positive values indicate the team overachieved, negative values mean they underperformed.

# Team W L T Pct GB PF PA PD SimW vsSim
1 New York Giants Division 8 1 1 .850 - 206 75 +131 7.50 +1.00
2 Philadelphia Eagles 7 1 2 .800 0.5 267 131 +136 6.27 +1.73
3 Washington Redskins 6 3 1 .650 2 169 180 -11 7.27 -0.77
4 Boston Yanks 2 8 0 .200 6.5 82 233 -151 1.72 +0.28
5 Brooklyn Tigers 0 10 0 .000 8.5 69 166 -97 2.33 -2.33
# Team W L T Pct GB PF PA PD SimW vsSim
1 Green Bay Packers Division 8 2 0 .800 - 238 141 +97 7.95 +0.05
2 Detroit Lions 6 3 1 .650 1.5 216 151 +65 4.79 +1.71
3 Chicago Bears 6 3 1 .650 1.5 258 172 +86 6.10 +0.40
4 Cleveland Rams 4 6 0 .400 4 188 224 -36 4.23 -0.23
5 Card Pitt Carpets 0 10 0 .000 8 108 328 -220 1.83 -1.83

Playoff Bracket

NFL Championship Game

Green Bay Packers 14
New York Giants 7

Dec 17

Season Summary

Every team's regular season finish compared against the simulated win totals. Click on any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual total minus the simulation's mean. Positive values indicate the team outperformed the expected total; negative values indicate the team was unluckier than expected. Percentile represents where their actual result fell in the simulated distribution.

Team Conference Division Elo Actual Avg. Wins Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Chicago Bears West 1956 6.5 6.10 +0.40 69.29% 1 4 5 6 7 8 10
New York Giants East 1906 8.5 7.50 +1.00 86.83% 2 5 7 7 8 9 10
Detroit Lions West 1872 6.5 4.79 +1.71 95.77% 0 3 4 5 5 6 10
Philadelphia Eagles East 1703 8 6.27 +1.73 98.29% 1 4 5 6 7 8 10
Green Bay Packers West 1569 8 7.95 +0.05 71.41% 2 6 7 8 9 10 10
Washington Redskins East 1432 6.5 7.27 -0.77 25.75% 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
Cleveland Rams West 1385 4 4.23 -0.23 66.03% 0 2 3 4 5 6 10
Boston Yanks East 1151 2 1.72 +0.28 84.09% 0 0 1 2 2 3 7
Brooklyn Tigers East 1019 0 2.33 -2.33 3.44% 0 1 1 2 3 4 7
Card Pitt Carpets West 1007 0 1.83 -1.83 13.51% 0 0 1 2 2 3 7

Head-to-Head

Cells show each team's record against each opponent with the expected wins from the simulation below Gold-tinted cells indicate the team beat the model's expectations by more than a half-win while navy-tinted cells indicate they fell short by more than a half-win. The first table covers within-division games while the second covers games against teams outside the division.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Within East

Team Yanks Tigers Giants Eagles Redskins
Boston Yanks
2-0
(0.6 exp.)
0-2
(0.1 exp.)
0-2
(0.7 exp.)
0-2
(0.1 exp.)
Brooklyn Tigers
0-2
(1.3 exp.)
0-2
(0.2 exp.)
0-2
(0.1 exp.)
0-2
(0.1 exp.)
New York Giants
2-0
(1.8 exp.)
2-0
(1.7 exp.)
0-1-1
(1.0 exp.)
2-0
(1.7 exp.)
Philadelphia Eagles
2-0
(1.2 exp.)
2-0
(1.9 exp.)
1-0-1
(0.9 exp.)
1-0-1
(0.4 exp.)
Washington Redskins
2-0
(1.8 exp.)
2-0
(1.9 exp.)
0-2
(0.2 exp.)
0-1-1
(1.5 exp.)

East vs. Outside Teams

Team Carpets Bears Rams Lions Packers
Boston Yanks
-
0-1
(0.0 exp.)
-
0-1
(0.0 exp.)
-
Brooklyn Tigers
-
-
-
0-1
(0.4 exp.)
0-1
(0.1 exp.)
New York Giants
1-0
(0.9 exp.)
-
-
-
1-0
(0.2 exp.)
Philadelphia Eagles
-
0-1
(0.8 exp.)
1-0
(0.8 exp.)
-
-
Washington Redskins
1-0
(0.9 exp.)
-
1-0
(0.8 exp.)
-
-

Within West

Team Carpets Bears Rams Lions Packers
Card Pitt Carpets
0-2
(0.3 exp.)
0-2
(0.7 exp.)
0-2
(0.4 exp.)
0-2
(0.1 exp.)
Chicago Bears
2-0
(1.6 exp.)
1-1
(0.8 exp.)
0-1-1
(1.6 exp.)
1-1
(0.7 exp.)
Cleveland Rams
2-0
(1.2 exp.)
1-1
(1.0 exp.)
1-1
(0.8 exp.)
0-2
(0.6 exp.)
Detroit Lions
2-0
(1.6 exp.)
1-0-1
(0.3 exp.)
1-1
(1.1 exp.)
0-2
(0.1 exp.)
Green Bay Packers
2-0
(1.8 exp.)
1-1
(1.2 exp.)
2-0
(1.3 exp.)
2-0
(1.8 exp.)

West vs. Outside Teams

Team Yanks Tigers Giants Eagles Redskins
Card Pitt Carpets
-
-
0-1
(0.1 exp.)
-
0-1
(0.0 exp.)
Chicago Bears
1-0
(1.0 exp.)
-
-
1-0
(0.1 exp.)
-
Cleveland Rams
-
-
-
0-1
(0.2 exp.)
0-1
(0.2 exp.)
Detroit Lions
1-0
(1.0 exp.)
1-0
(0.6 exp.)
-
-
-
Green Bay Packers
-
1-0
(0.8 exp.)
0-1
(0.8 exp.)
-
-

Scoreline Distribution

Cells represent the percentage of games that ended with a team's points in the row and its opponent's points in the column. Cells below the diagonal are wins (gold), and cells above are losses (blue). Totals along the edges show the marginal percentages for that row or column.

Win Loss Same range
↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–63.00%1.00%5.00%4.00%1.00%14.00%
7–133.00%6.00%5.00%4.00%2.00%2.00%22.00%
14–201.00%6.00%8.00%3.00%1.00%1.00%20.00%
21–275.00%5.00%3.00%4.00%2.00%1.00%20.00%
28–344.00%4.00%2.00%4.00%1.00%15.00%
35–411.00%2.00%1.00%1.00%5.00%
42+2.00%1.00%1.00%4.00%
Total14.00%22.00%20.00%20.00%15.00%5.00%4.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 18.01 18.01 +0.00
SD 11.82 11.82 19.18
CV 0.66 0.66
Max 49 49 +42
Min 0 0 -42

Games Played: 50

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–610.00%10.00%20.00%
7–1310.00%10.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%60.00%
14–2010.00%10.00%20.00%
21–27
28–34
35–41
42+
Total10.00%20.00%30.00%20.00%20.00%100%

Boston Yanks — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 8.20 23.30 -15.10
SD 5.55 10.53 14.99
CV 0.68 0.45
Max 17 38 +7
Min 0 6 -38

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–630.00%10.00%40.00%
7–1320.00%10.00%30.00%
14–2030.00%30.00%
21–27
28–34
35–41
42+
Total30.00%50.00%10.00%10.00%100%

Brooklyn Tigers — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 6.90 16.60 -9.70
SD 5.72 7.38 9.13
CV 0.83 0.44
Max 14 34 -3
Min 0 7 -34

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–620.00%10.00%30.00%
7–1310.00%20.00%10.00%40.00%
14–2010.00%10.00%20.00%
21–27
28–3410.00%10.00%
35–41
42+
Total30.00%40.00%10.00%20.00%100%

Card Pitt Carpets — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 10.80 32.80 -22.00
SD 8.73 8.38 10.49
CV 0.81 0.26
Max 28 49 -2
Min 0 21 -42

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–1310.00%10.00%
14–20
21–2710.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%40.00%
28–3420.00%10.00%10.00%40.00%
35–41
42+10.00%10.00%
Total10.00%40.00%10.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%100%

Chicago Bears — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 25.80 17.20 +8.60
SD 10.88 14.63 20.06
CV 0.42 0.85
Max 49 42 +42
Min 7 0 -20

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–1310.00%10.00%10.00%30.00%
14–2010.00%10.00%10.00%30.00%
21–2720.00%20.00%
28–3410.00%10.00%20.00%
35–41
42+
Total10.00%10.00%20.00%20.00%30.00%10.00%100%

Cleveland Rams — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 18.80 22.40 -3.60
SD 8.24 11.24 16.47
CV 0.44 0.50
Max 33 42 +27
Min 7 6 -35

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–610.00%10.00%20.00%
7–13
14–2020.00%20.00%
21–2710.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%40.00%
28–34
35–4110.00%10.00%20.00%
42+
Total10.00%20.00%40.00%30.00%100%

Detroit Lions — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 21.60 15.10 +6.50
SD 12.62 7.09 16.30
CV 0.58 0.47
Max 41 27 +31
Min 0 6 -21

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–620.00%20.00%
7–13
14–2010.00%10.00%20.00%
21–2710.00%10.00%
28–3410.00%10.00%20.00%
35–4110.00%10.00%
42+10.00%10.00%20.00%
Total20.00%30.00%10.00%30.00%10.00%100%

Green Bay Packers — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 23.80 14.10 +9.70
SD 15.87 9.64 18.91
CV 0.67 0.68
Max 42 28 +35
Min 0 0 -24

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–1310.00%10.00%
14–2020.00%10.00%30.00%
21–2720.00%10.00%10.00%40.00%
28–3420.00%20.00%
35–41
42+
Total50.00%30.00%20.00%100%

New York Giants — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 20.60 7.50 +13.10
SD 7.44 9.26 13.38
CV 0.36 1.24
Max 31 24 +31
Min 7 0 -7

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–6
7–1310.00%10.00%
14–20
21–2720.00%10.00%10.00%40.00%
28–3410.00%10.00%10.00%30.00%
35–4110.00%10.00%20.00%
42+
Total20.00%40.00%10.00%10.00%20.00%100%

Philadelphia Eagles — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 26.70 13.10 +13.60
SD 9.24 10.93 18.09
CV 0.35 0.83
Max 38 31 +38
Min 7 0 -21

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →0–67–1314–2021–2728–3435–4142+Total
0–610.00%10.00%
7–1310.00%10.00%10.00%30.00%
14–2020.00%10.00%30.00%
21–2710.00%10.00%
28–3410.00%10.00%
35–41
42+10.00%10.00%
Total10.00%20.00%40.00%20.00%10.00%100%

Washington Redskins — Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 16.90 18.00 -1.10
SD 12.06 11.78 16.88
CV 0.71 0.65
Max 42 37 +22
Min 0 0 -31

Games Played: 10

Wins vs. Points Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Wins plotted against points scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in wins per 10 points).

Fit Metrics

Slope
Scored 0.77 +0.4
Allowed 0.58 -0.3
Differential 0.86 +0.2

Home-Field Advantage Edge

A measure of how well each team has taken advantage of home-field advantage during the season. For each team, sum the win probabilities for home games and compare against the team's actual performance at home. Repeat for games on the road. Positive values indicate the team has played comparatively better at home than on the road. Negative values indicate the team is not utilizing home field advantage.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

The teams that deviated the most from the simulated results.

Top Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 Philadelphia Eagles 8 6.27 +1.73
2 Detroit Lions 6.5 4.79 +1.71
3 New York Giants 8.5 7.50 +1.00
4 Chicago Bears 6.5 6.10 +0.40
5 Boston Yanks 2 1.72 +0.28

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim Luck
1 Brooklyn Tigers 0 2.33 -2.33
2 Card Pitt Carpets 0 1.83 -1.83
3 Washington Redskins 6.5 7.27 -0.77
4 Cleveland Rams 4 4.23 -0.23
5 Green Bay Packers 8 7.95 +0.05

Top Streaks

The most unlikely streaks achieved by teams throughout the season according to the model's probabilities. Calculated by using the pregame win/tie/loss probabilities for all the games in each team's streak.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Detroit Lions 5 Nov 5 – Dec 3 1 in 20
2 Chicago Bears 3 Oct 29 – Nov 12 1 in 10
3 New York Giants 4 Nov 19 – Dec 10 1 in 8
4 Boston Yanks 1 Oct 29 – Oct 29 1 in 7
5 Cleveland Rams 3 Sep 24 – Oct 15 1 in 6

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Brooklyn Tigers 10 Sep 17 – Dec 3 1 in 56
2 Card Pitt Carpets 10 Sep 24 – Dec 3 1 in 12
3 Philadelphia Eagles 1 Nov 26 – Nov 26 1 in 8
4 Cleveland Rams 4 Oct 22 – Nov 12 1 in 7
5 New York Giants 1 Oct 29 – Oct 29 1 in 5

Finish Position Heatmaps

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team finished in a given position in the simulation.

Team12345
New York Giants44.14%35.58%20.07%0.20%<0.01%
Washington Redskins40.20%39.08%20.55%0.17%<0.01%
Philadelphia Eagles15.65%25.27%57.88%1.17%0.04%
Brooklyn Tigers<0.01%0.06%1.21%67.75%30.98%
Boston Yanks-0.01%0.30%30.71%68.98%
Team12345
Green Bay Packers81.23%14.99%3.08%0.68%0.02%
Chicago Bears14.52%52.77%23.53%8.81%0.37%
Detroit Lions2.39%20.70%46.86%27.77%2.29%
Cleveland Rams1.85%11.36%24.79%50.73%11.27%
Card Pitt Carpets0.01%0.18%1.74%12.02%86.05%
Team12345678910
Green Bay Packers48.66%25.67%11.44%8.34%3.55%1.70%0.56%0.06%<0.01%-
New York Giants23.01%25.36%25.19%13.86%9.80%2.48%0.24%0.05%<0.01%<0.01%
Washington Redskins16.87%27.70%26.30%14.90%10.33%3.51%0.31%0.07%<0.01%<0.01%
Philadelphia Eagles6.30%11.04%18.28%17.45%29.80%13.85%2.67%0.56%0.05%<0.01%
Chicago Bears4.50%8.12%13.48%28.34%19.25%17.47%7.87%0.81%0.16%0.01%
Detroit Lions0.27%1.08%2.78%10.75%17.02%38.04%21.95%6.39%1.46%0.26%
Cleveland Rams0.40%1.02%2.48%6.22%9.41%19.38%40.55%12.14%6.25%2.13%
Brooklyn Tigers-<0.01%0.02%0.07%0.51%1.64%13.74%43.86%21.27%18.89%
Card Pitt Carpets-<0.01%0.01%0.07%0.25%1.56%8.11%14.06%39.22%36.71%
Boston Yanks--<0.01%0.01%0.07%0.36%3.98%22.00%31.58%41.98%

Win Totals in Context

How each team's actual results compared to their simulated results, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Click a division name in the legend to toggle it on or off.

Playoff Seed Probabilities

Cells represent the percentage of the time a team earned a given playoff seed in the simulation. Teams are sorted by likelihood of earning the top seed. Teams that missed the playoffs more often sit toward the bottom.

Team1 SeedMissed Playoffs
New York Giants44.14%55.86%
Washington Redskins40.20%59.80%
Philadelphia Eagles15.65%84.35%
Brooklyn Tigers<0.01%100.00%
Boston Yanks-100.00%
Team1 SeedMissed Playoffs
Green Bay Packers81.23%18.77%
Chicago Bears14.52%85.48%
Detroit Lions2.39%97.61%
Cleveland Rams1.85%98.15%
Card Pitt Carpets0.01%99.99%

Wins Required to Clinch Each Seed

The empirical cumulative distribution that shows the probability that a team earning that seed finished the regular season with at most a given number of wins. The point where each line passes through 50% is roughly the median wins for that seed.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Percentage of games won by the home team - percentage of games won by the away team
No Edge: under 2% · Slight Edge: 2% to 6% · Clear Edge: 6% to 10% · Fortress: 10% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points that 1 point is worth. A team this many Elo ratings points better than another would be expected to defeat their opponent by 1 point at a neutral location.
Scoring Tilt
Average home points - average away points per game. The gold line represents the expected home points edge according to the scoring value of a point of Elo and the number of Elo rating points home advantage is worth.
Road-Tilted: under -3.2 · Lean Road: -3.2 to 0 · Lean Home: 0 to 3.2 · Home-Tilted: 3.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeTieAway
+14.00%
Fortress
54.00%6.00%40.00%
Elo Value
Home Edge
36 Elo
0.028 points per Elo point
048.96100
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+2.22 points
Lean Home
-8+1.36+8

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of preseason title contenders. Calculated by taking 1 divided by the sum of squared preseason title odds. Higher numbers indicate more parity in the league while 1 indicates that the preseason favorite is a near-lock.
Front-Runner: under 2 · Few Contenders: 2 to 4 · Open Race: 4 to 8 · Wide Open: 8 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would win the title based on the simulated results. Location of the dot marks their rank across all teams, ranging from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st · Among the Favorites: 2nd · Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 5th · Longshot: 6th or lower.
Title Run Odds
Given that actual playoff bracket, the probability that the champion would win the exact series/games they faced in reality. The gold line represents their odds of winning if every series/game was a toss-up.
Long Shot: under 25% · Tough Road: 25% to 50% · Favored: 50% to 100% · Heavy Favorite: 100% and up.
Title-Race Openness
4.0
Open Race
124810
Champion Preseason Odds
28%
Green Bay Packers, 2nd of 10
LongshotFavorite
Title Run Odds
Coin-flip
9.7%
Long Shot
050.00%100%

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Average standard deviation of the difference between each team's actual wins total and their simulated average wins total. The gold line is the standard deviation the model expected from random chance alone.
Subdued: under 0.92 · As Expected: 0.92 to 1.27 · Elevated: 1.27 to 1.73 · High Variance: 1.73 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap in the rank of the final standings between where each team finished in the standings and where the model projected them to finish.
Pinpoint: under 0.86 · Close: 0.86 to 1.17 · Off Target: 1.17 to 1.53 · Well Off Target: 1.53 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team whose record finished in the highest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the top team in a league of 10 teams typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team whose record finished in the lowest percentile within its own simulated range of outcomes. The gold line indicates where the bottom team in a league of 10 teams typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished either above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile. Even with a well-calibrated model, 10% of teams are expected to land in the extremes of their distributions.
Minimal Outliers: under 0.5 · As Expected: 0.5 to 1.2 · Several Outliers: 1.2 to 2.2 · Many Outliers: 2.2 and up.
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Number of teams that actually made the playoffs but were not in the model's projected field.The gold line represents how many playoff teams the simulation missed on average.
Fewer Than Expected: under 0.56 · As Expected: 0.56 to 0.93 · More Than Expected: 0.93 to 1.49 · Far More Than Expected: 1.49 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
1.30 wins
Elevated
01.153
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.10
Close
01.022.5
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.00%
98.29%
Philadelphia Eagles
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 5.00%
3.44%
Brooklyn Tigers
050
Season Outliers
Expected
3 of 10
Many Outliers
01.010
Unexpected Playoff Teams
Expected
0 of 2
Fewer Than Expected
00.72

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
Measures how evenly wins were distributed across the league. Lower scores indicate there was less variability across the actual wins totals .Higher scores are an indication of more imbalance in the league with a few unusually strong or unusually weak teams.
Highly Balanced: under 0.08 · Balanced: 0.08 to 0.15 · Top-Heavy: 0.15 to 0.24 · Concentrated: 0.24 and up.
Noll-Scully
Measures how more times spread out the final standings were in reality compared to standings that were generated by flipping a coin for each game. The gold line at 1 indicates as much variability in the standings as s coin flip. Above it, talent gaps in team composition stretched the standings more than the variability produced by luck alone. Below it, the league was more competitive than coin flips alone would yield.
Compressed: under 0.9 · Coin-Flip Spread: 0.9 to 1.15 · Moderate Separation: 1.15 to 1.45 · Stratified: 1.45 and up.
Interquartile Edge
The probability that the team in the 75th percentile of the league's Elo ratings would defeat the team in the 25th percentile at a neutral site. The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league.
Even: under 58% · Competitive: 58% to 65% · Tilted: 65% to 73% · Lopsided: 73% and up.
Best vs. Worst
The probability that the team with the highest Elo rating would defeat the team with the lowest Elo rating at a neutral site.The higher the probability, the larger the gap between the top teams and bottom teams in the league. The gold line represents how high this probability is expected to be in a league of this size. A blue dot to the right indicates an unusually dominant team or an unusually weak team.
Tight: under 65% · Clear Edge: 65% to 78% · Lopsided: 78% to 88% · No Contest: 88% and up.
Close Games
Actual percentage of games decided by 3 run/points or fewer. The gold line indicates the proportion of close games you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Mostly Decisive: under 25% · Some Drama: 25% to 38% · Often Close: 38% to 50% · Nail-Biters: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Actual percentage of games decided by 17 runs/points or more. The gold line indicates the proportion of blowouts you would expect after considering the Elo ratings of the involved teams and the scoring value of a single Elo point.
Rare: under 10% · Occasional: 10% to 20% · Frequent: 20% to 30% · Routine: 30% and up.
Gini Index
0.34
Concentrated
00.080.150.240.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.51
Stratified
01.003
Interquartile Edge
97%
Lopsided
50%58%65%73%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 100%
100%
No Contest
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
16%
Mostly Decisive
0%14%100%
Blowouts
Expected
40%
Routine
0%39%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame win probabilities aligned with the actual game result, averaged over the entire season. Picks that were both confident and correct are rewarded the most, while incorrect predictions and/or uncertain predictions are penalized more. Lower scores are better. 0 indicates every game was perfectly predicted with maximum confidence. For sports with where wins and losses are the only outcomes, Brier scores less than 0.25 indicate the model did better than random predictions. For sports where ties are possible, 0.67 is the cutoff for which the Brier score must be lower to beat random predictions. The lower the Brier score, the easier and more accurately the games were to predict.
Highly Predictable: under 0.18 · Predictable: 0.18 to 0.22 · Hard to Predict: 0.22 to 0.25 · Coin-Flip: 0.25 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, calculated by averaging the difference in the win probabilities divided by the sum of the win probabilities. Lower scores indicate more parity in the league. 0 indicates that every game was a 50-50 toss-up between evenly matched teams. 1 means every game pitted a heavy favorite against a huge underdog.
Evenly Matched: under 0.12 · Slight Separation: 0.12 to 0.22 · Wide Gaps: 0.22 to 0.34 · Lopsided: 0.34 and up.
Strangeness
How extreme the actual final standings were compared to what the model expected. A value of 0 would indicate that the simulated results perfectly matched the actual standings. A score of 1 indicates that the actual results were scattered around the projections by exactly the variance the model predicted. (i.e. The projections missed the actual standings by 1 standard deviation on average. Scores larger than 1 mean the season was wilder to forecast with more overperforming and underperforming teams than expected. Scores less than 1 indicate the season was more predictable.
Tighter Than Modeled: under 0.85 · As Expected: 0.85 to 1.15 · Volatile: 1.15 to 1.5 · Chaotic: 1.5 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the order of the final standings aligned with the ranked preseason Elo ratings as calculated by the Spearman rank correlation. Larger values indicate that the preseason Elo ratings were a strong predictor of the team's final rank in the standings while values near 0 mean.
Reshuffled: under 0.3 · Weak Alignment: 0.3 to 0.6 · Strong Alignment: 0.6 to 0.85 · Closely Aligned: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality. The gold line measures how often the model expected the underdog to win when considering the outcome probabilities. A blue dot to the right of the gold line means upsets were more prevalent than left. A dot to the left indicates that favorites won more often than expected.
Chalk Held: under 30% · As Expected: 30% to 40% · Upset-Prone: 40% to 46% · Bedlam: 46% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
The percentage of the time the underdog won the game in reality, but only including games with a clear favorite, one at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside. This metrics ignores games that could be considered toss-ups. The gold line is how often the model expected these heavy favorites to lose. A dot to the right means the big favorites were upset more than expected; to the left means they took care of business.
Favorites Held: under 22% · As Expected: 22% to 32% · Shaky Favorites: 32% to 42% · Bedlam: 42% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.15
Highly Predictable
00.131
Matchup Imbalance
0.64
Lopsided
00.120.220.340.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.41
Volatile
01.002
Repeatability
0.30
Reshuffled
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
20%
Chalk Held
0%17%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
18%
Favorites Held
0%14%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Games are sorted into bins according to how confident the model was. Within each bin, the predicted number of wins, losses, and ties are compared against the actual counts. The p-value of this test is plotted below. Values above 0.05 indicate that the model's probabilities are well-calibrated for the season.
Clear Misfit: under 0.01 · Misfit: 0.01 to 0.05 · Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 · Well Calibrated: 0.1 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the model's probabilities is correct. Each probability is turned into their log-odds. A line is fit that predicts the actual results from the log-odds. The slope of this line is the calibration slope.A slope of 1.00 is perfect, indicating that the model's confidence matches the actual outcomes of the games. Slopes less than 1.00 indicate overconfidence. The model assigned higher probabilities to the favorites than was appropriate given the matchup, causing more losses by favored teams. Slopes greater than 1.00 indicate under-confidence. The model is more uncertain about too many results, assigning them lower probabilities when in reality the favorites should have had higher probabilities.
Overconfident: under 0.85 · Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 · Underconfident: 1.15 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
Calibration error (ECE) checks whether the model's probabilities mean what they say. ECE is calculated as the average weighted gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted outcome actually occurred. The smaller the ECE, the more confident we are about the model's probabilities. The gold line represents the noise ceiling, which is the amount of error that luck can produce on its own even if the probabilities are perfectly calibrated. Values below the noise ceiling indicate that the model's error is no larger than chance alone would produce. Values above the noice ceiling point to a genuine calibration issue since the error is larger than luck could explain.
Well Within Noise: under 0.09 · Within Noise: 0.09 to 0.18 · Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.36 · Well Above Noise: 0.36 and up.
Probability calibration
0.20
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.11
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.80
Overconfident
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.151
Within Noise
00.1800.4

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual wins, simulated final wins, playoff probability, and division-title probability - day by day. Select a division to see all five charts for its teams.

Elo Through the Playoffs

How each playoff team's Elo rating evolved as the postseason unfolded. Elo Progression traces each team's game-by-game Elo rating through their playoff run. Net Elo Change summarizes the difference in Elo rating between the beginning and end of the playoffs for each team.

Stochastic Playoff Outcomes

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Made Playoffs Won Super Bowl
New York Giants 44.14% 36.58%
Green Bay Packers 81.23% 27.71%
Washington Redskins 40.20% 13.30%
Philadelphia Eagles 15.65% 10.57%
Chicago Bears 14.52% 10.15%
Detroit Lions 2.39% 1.46%
Cleveland Rams 1.85% 0.24%
Card Pitt Carpets 0.01% <0.01%
Brooklyn Tigers <0.01% -
Loser →
↓ Winner
Card Pitt CarpetsChicago BearsCleveland RamsDetroit LionsGreen Bay PackersBrooklyn TigersNew York GiantsPhiladelphia EaglesWashington Redskins
Brooklyn Tigers0.0%<0.01%0.0%<0.01%
New York Giants100.0%<0.01%48.7%7.42%96.3%1.15%60.8%1.23%90.6%34.34%
Philadelphia Eagles66.7%<0.01%23.7%1.73%89.7%0.21%31.1%0.33%73.8%13.37%
Washington Redskins100.0%<0.01%6.4%5.36%65.2%0.49%9.4%0.83%37.5%33.51%
Card Pitt Carpets0.0%<0.01%33.3%<0.01%0.0%<0.01%
Chicago Bears100.0%<0.01%51.3%7.42%76.3%1.73%93.6%5.36%
Cleveland Rams3.7%1.15%10.3%0.21%34.8%0.49%
Detroit Lions39.2%1.23%68.9%0.33%90.6%0.83%
Green Bay Packers100.0%<0.01%9.4%34.34%26.2%13.37%62.5%33.51%

Actual Bracket Simulation

How we would have expected the postseason to play out at the beginning of the season according to the simulation. The table summarizes each team's chances of advancing to each round. Individual matchup heat maps for each round are displayed using the subsequent buttons. The top percentage in each cell represents each team's winning percentage against the corresponding opponent. The bottom percentage represents how often that specific matchup occurred during that round in the simulation.

Team Won Super Bowl
New York Giants 90.31%
Green Bay Packers 9.69%
Loser →
↓ Winner
Green Bay PackersNew York Giants
New York Giants90.3%100.00%
Green Bay Packers9.7%100.00%

Most-Likely Championship Paths

For each playoff team, what was the most likely path they had to the championship across all simulations? Tiles represent the opponent they faced and defeated the most often in each round.

New York Giants 90.31% chance to win
Super Bowl
vs. Green Bay Packers
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
90.31%
Green Bay Packers 9.69% chance to win
Super Bowl
vs. New York Giants
Matchup
100.00%
Win Prob
9.69%

Regular Season Games

Summary of every regular-season game played this season.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1944-09-26 Philadelphia Eagles L 7-28 1275.00 1223.53 60.50% 32.90% -214.40 0-1
1944-10-08 New York Giants L 10-22 1060.60 1564.05 6.55% 91.39% -17.23 0-2
1944-10-15 Washington Redskins L 14-21 1043.37 1713.79 2.67% 96.41% -5.25 0-3
1944-10-22 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 0-38 1038.12 1448.78 6.38% 91.61% -29.82 0-4
1944-10-29 @ Brooklyn Tigers W 17-14 1008.30 1259.06 14.11% 81.97% +107.36 1-4
1944-11-05 @ New York Giants L 0-31 1115.66 1504.69 7.13% 90.64% -30.24 1-5
1944-11-12 @ Chicago Bears L 7-21 1085.42 1951.27 0.51% 99.29% -1.40 1-6
1944-11-19 Brooklyn Tigers W 13-6 1084.02 1123.15 47.86% 45.04% +93.88 2-6
1944-11-26 @ Washington Redskins L 7-14 1177.90 1482.71 10.89% 85.92% -22.31 2-7
1944-12-03 @ Detroit Lions L 7-38 1155.59 1866.78 1.23% 98.32% -5.05 2-8
1944-09-17 @ Green Bay Packers L 7-14 1403.57 1646.34 14.65% 81.32% -30.37 0-1
1944-10-08 @ Detroit Lions L 14-19 1373.20 1391.80 37.09% 56.04% -65.97 0-2
1944-10-15 New York Giants L 7-14 1307.23 1581.28 19.80% 75.20% -41.52 0-3
1944-10-22 @ Washington Redskins L 14-17 1265.71 1719.04 5.09% 93.25% -6.65 0-4
1944-10-29 Boston Yanks L 14-17 1259.06 1008.30 81.97% 14.11% -107.37 0-5
1944-11-05 Philadelphia Eagles L 7-21 1151.69 1630.69 7.43% 90.27% -21.20 0-6
1944-11-12 Washington Redskins L 0-10 1130.49 1773.10 3.11% 95.83% -7.34 0-7
1944-11-19 @ Boston Yanks L 6-13 1123.15 1084.02 45.04% 47.86% -93.87 0-8
1944-11-26 @ New York Giants L 0-7 1029.28 1832.02 0.73% 98.99% -1.43 0-9
1944-12-03 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 0-34 1027.85 1650.77 2.02% 97.27% -8.72 0-10
1944-09-24 Cleveland Rams L 28-30 1500.00 1525.26 49.86% 43.08% -55.16 0-1
1944-10-08 @ Green Bay Packers L 7-34 1444.84 1835.80 7.06% 90.73% -27.93 0-2
1944-10-15 @ Chicago Bears L 7-34 1416.91 1475.67 32.01% 61.47% -132.73 0-3
1944-10-22 @ New York Giants L 0-23 1284.18 1622.80 9.21% 88.02% -33.97 0-4
1944-10-29 @ Washington Redskins L 20-42 1250.21 1725.69 4.53% 93.99% -15.95 0-5
1944-11-05 Detroit Lions L 6-27 1234.26 1415.21 29.15% 64.59% -106.66 0-6
1944-11-12 @ Detroit Lions L 7-21 1127.60 1521.86 6.94% 90.89% -19.76 0-7
1944-11-19 Cleveland Rams L 6-33 1107.84 1382.11 19.78% 75.22% -81.46 0-8
1944-11-26 Green Bay Packers L 20-35 1026.38 1552.35 5.82% 92.32% -17.06 0-9
1944-12-03 Chicago Bears L 7-49 1009.32 1952.93 0.57% 99.20% -2.73 0-10
1944-09-24 @ Green Bay Packers L 28-42 1721.82 1676.71 45.90% 47.01% -135.11 0-1
1944-10-08 @ Cleveland Rams L 7-19 1586.71 1580.42 40.44% 52.56% -111.04 0-2
1944-10-15 Card Pitt Carpets W 34-7 1475.67 1416.91 61.47% 32.01% +132.73 1-2
1944-10-22 Detroit Lions T 21-21 1608.40 1425.30 75.89% 19.20% -10.66 1-2
1944-10-29 Cleveland Rams W 28-21 1597.74 1668.66 43.32% 49.61% +102.71 2-2
1944-11-05 Green Bay Packers W 21-0 1700.45 1939.75 22.99% 71.51% +250.82 3-2
1944-11-12 Boston Yanks W 21-7 1951.27 1085.42 99.29% 0.51% +1.40 4-2
1944-11-19 @ Detroit Lions L 21-41 1952.67 1541.63 86.46% 10.46% -290.47 4-3
1944-11-26 @ Philadelphia Eagles W 28-7 1662.20 1941.50 12.33% 84.15% +290.73 5-3
1944-12-03 @ Card Pitt Carpets W 49-7 1952.93 1009.32 99.20% 0.57% +2.73 6-3
1944-09-24 @ Card Pitt Carpets W 30-28 1525.26 1500.00 43.08% 49.86% +55.16 1-0
1944-10-08 Chicago Bears W 19-7 1580.42 1586.71 52.56% 40.44% +111.03 2-0
1944-10-15 @ Detroit Lions W 20-17 1691.45 1457.77 70.88% 23.54% +32.47 3-0
1944-10-22 @ Green Bay Packers L 21-30 1723.92 1863.74 23.14% 71.33% -55.26 3-1
1944-10-29 @ Chicago Bears L 21-28 1668.66 1597.74 49.61% 43.32% -102.71 3-2
1944-11-05 @ Washington Redskins L 10-14 1565.95 1741.65 19.84% 75.15% -31.45 3-3
1944-11-12 Green Bay Packers L 7-42 1534.50 1688.94 32.28% 61.17% -152.39 3-4
1944-11-19 @ Card Pitt Carpets W 33-6 1382.11 1107.84 75.22% 19.78% +81.46 4-4
1944-11-26 Detroit Lions L 14-26 1463.57 1832.10 12.85% 83.51% -34.68 4-5
1944-12-10 @ Philadelphia Eagles L 13-26 1428.89 1659.49 15.50% 80.30% -43.89 4-6
1944-10-01 @ Green Bay Packers L 6-27 1415.78 1811.82 6.88% 90.97% -23.98 0-1
1944-10-08 Brooklyn Tigers W 19-14 1391.80 1373.20 56.04% 37.09% +65.97 1-1
1944-10-15 Cleveland Rams L 17-20 1457.77 1691.45 23.54% 70.88% -32.47 1-2
1944-10-22 @ Chicago Bears T 21-21 1425.30 1608.40 19.20% 75.89% +10.66 1-2
1944-10-29 Green Bay Packers L 0-14 1435.96 1919.00 7.28% 90.46% -20.75 1-3
1944-11-05 @ Card Pitt Carpets W 27-6 1415.21 1234.26 64.59% 29.15% +106.65 2-3
1944-11-12 Card Pitt Carpets W 21-7 1521.86 1127.60 90.89% 6.94% +19.77 3-3
1944-11-19 Chicago Bears W 41-21 1541.63 1952.67 10.46% 86.46% +290.47 4-3
1944-11-26 @ Cleveland Rams W 26-14 1832.10 1463.57 83.51% 12.85% +34.68 5-3
1944-12-03 Boston Yanks W 38-7 1866.78 1155.59 98.32% 1.23% +5.05 6-3
1944-09-17 Brooklyn Tigers W 14-7 1646.34 1403.57 81.32% 14.65% +30.37 1-0
1944-09-24 Chicago Bears W 42-28 1676.71 1721.82 47.01% 45.90% +135.11 2-0
1944-10-01 Detroit Lions W 27-6 1811.82 1415.78 90.97% 6.88% +23.98 3-0
1944-10-08 Card Pitt Carpets W 34-7 1835.80 1444.84 90.73% 7.06% +27.94 4-0
1944-10-22 Cleveland Rams W 30-21 1863.74 1723.92 71.33% 23.14% +55.26 5-0
1944-10-29 @ Detroit Lions W 14-0 1919.00 1435.96 90.46% 7.28% +20.75 6-0
1944-11-05 @ Chicago Bears L 0-21 1939.75 1700.45 71.51% 22.99% -250.81 6-1
1944-11-12 @ Cleveland Rams W 42-7 1688.94 1534.50 61.17% 32.28% +152.38 7-1
1944-11-19 @ New York Giants L 0-24 1841.32 1543.05 77.57% 17.79% -288.97 7-2
1944-11-26 @ Card Pitt Carpets W 35-20 1552.35 1026.38 92.32% 5.82% +17.06 8-2
1944-10-08 @ Boston Yanks W 22-10 1564.05 1060.60 91.39% 6.55% +17.23 1-0
1944-10-15 @ Brooklyn Tigers W 14-7 1581.28 1307.23 75.20% 19.80% +41.52 2-0
1944-10-22 Card Pitt Carpets W 23-0 1622.80 1284.18 88.02% 9.21% +33.97 3-0
1944-10-29 Philadelphia Eagles L 17-24 1656.77 1478.61 75.40% 19.62% -152.08 3-1
1944-11-05 Boston Yanks W 31-0 1504.69 1115.66 90.64% 7.13% +30.25 4-1
1944-11-12 @ Philadelphia Eagles T 21-21 1534.94 1651.89 25.44% 68.72% +8.11 4-1
1944-11-19 Green Bay Packers W 24-0 1543.05 1841.32 17.79% 77.57% +288.97 5-1
1944-11-26 Brooklyn Tigers W 7-0 1832.02 1029.28 98.99% 0.73% +1.43 6-1
1944-12-03 Washington Redskins W 16-13 1833.45 1505.01 87.42% 9.69% +12.93 7-1
1944-12-10 @ Washington Redskins W 31-0 1846.38 1492.08 82.42% 13.75% +59.80 8-1
1944-09-26 @ Boston Yanks W 28-7 1223.53 1275.00 32.90% 60.50% +214.40 1-0
1944-10-08 Washington Redskins T 31-31 1437.93 1724.64 18.73% 76.46% +10.85 1-0
1944-10-22 Boston Yanks W 38-0 1448.78 1038.12 91.61% 6.38% +29.83 2-0
1944-10-29 @ New York Giants W 24-17 1478.61 1656.77 19.62% 75.40% +152.08 3-0
1944-11-05 @ Brooklyn Tigers W 21-7 1630.69 1151.69 90.27% 7.43% +21.20 4-0
1944-11-12 New York Giants T 21-21 1651.89 1534.94 68.72% 25.44% -8.11 4-0
1944-11-19 @ Washington Redskins W 37-7 1643.78 1780.43 23.45% 70.98% +297.72 5-0
1944-11-26 Chicago Bears L 7-28 1941.50 1662.20 84.15% 12.33% -290.73 5-1
1944-12-03 Brooklyn Tigers W 34-0 1650.77 1027.85 97.27% 2.02% +8.72 6-1
1944-12-10 Cleveland Rams W 26-13 1659.49 1428.89 80.30% 15.50% +43.89 7-1
1944-10-08 @ Philadelphia Eagles T 31-31 1724.64 1437.93 76.46% 18.73% -10.85 0-0
1944-10-15 @ Boston Yanks W 21-14 1713.79 1043.37 96.41% 2.67% +5.25 1-0
1944-10-22 Brooklyn Tigers W 17-14 1719.04 1265.71 93.25% 5.09% +6.65 2-0
1944-10-29 Card Pitt Carpets W 42-20 1725.69 1250.21 93.99% 4.53% +15.96 3-0
1944-11-05 Cleveland Rams W 14-10 1741.65 1565.95 75.15% 19.84% +31.45 4-0
1944-11-12 @ Brooklyn Tigers W 10-0 1773.10 1130.49 95.83% 3.11% +7.33 5-0
1944-11-19 Philadelphia Eagles L 7-37 1780.43 1643.78 70.98% 23.45% -297.72 5-1
1944-11-26 Boston Yanks W 14-7 1482.71 1177.90 85.92% 10.89% +22.30 6-1
1944-12-03 @ New York Giants L 13-16 1505.01 1833.45 9.69% 87.42% -12.93 6-2
1944-12-10 New York Giants L 0-31 1492.08 1846.38 13.75% 82.42% -59.81 6-3

Playoff Games

Every playoff game from the selected team's perspective.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Loss % Elo Δ Record
1944-12-17 @ New York Giants W 14-7 1569.41 1906.18 9.79% 90.21% +174.30 1-0
1944-12-17 Green Bay Packers L 7-14 1906.18 1569.41 90.21% 9.79% -174.29 0-1

Biggest Upsets

The 25 biggest upsets of the seasons, ranked by lowest pregame win probability. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1944-12-17 * 9.79% Green Bay Packers 1569.41 14 @ New York Giants 1906.18 7
2 1944-11-19 10.46% @ Detroit Lions 1541.63 41 Chicago Bears 1952.67 21
3 1944-11-26 12.33% Chicago Bears 1662.20 28 @ Philadelphia Eagles 1941.50 7
4 1944-10-29 14.11% Boston Yanks 1008.30 17 @ Brooklyn Tigers 1259.06 14
5 1944-11-19 17.79% @ New York Giants 1543.05 24 Green Bay Packers 1841.32 0
6 1944-10-29 19.62% Philadelphia Eagles 1478.61 24 @ New York Giants 1656.77 17
7 1944-11-05 22.99% @ Chicago Bears 1700.45 21 Green Bay Packers 1939.75 0
8 1944-11-19 23.45% Philadelphia Eagles 1643.78 37 @ Washington Redskins 1780.43 7
9 1944-09-26 32.90% Philadelphia Eagles 1223.53 28 @ Boston Yanks 1275.00 7
10 1944-09-24 43.08% Cleveland Rams 1525.26 30 @ Card Pitt Carpets 1500.00 28
11 1944-10-29 43.32% @ Chicago Bears 1597.74 28 Cleveland Rams 1668.66 21

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1944-11-19 297.72 Philadelphia Eagles 37 1643.78 23.45% @ Washington Redskins 7 1780.43 70.98%
2 1944-11-26 290.73 Chicago Bears 28 1662.20 12.33% @ Philadelphia Eagles 7 1941.50 84.15%
3 1944-11-19 290.47 @ Detroit Lions 41 1541.63 10.46% Chicago Bears 21 1952.67 86.46%
4 1944-11-19 288.97 @ New York Giants 24 1543.05 17.79% Green Bay Packers 0 1841.32 77.57%
5 1944-11-05 250.82 @ Chicago Bears 21 1700.45 22.99% Green Bay Packers 0 1939.75 71.51%
6 1944-09-26 214.40 Philadelphia Eagles 28 1223.53 32.90% @ Boston Yanks 7 1275.00 60.50%
7 1944-12-17 * 174.30 Green Bay Packers 14 1569.41 9.79% @ New York Giants 7 1906.18 90.21%
8 1944-11-12 152.39 Green Bay Packers 42 1688.94 61.17% @ Cleveland Rams 7 1534.50 32.28%
9 1944-10-29 152.08 Philadelphia Eagles 24 1478.61 19.62% @ New York Giants 17 1656.77 75.40%
10 1944-09-24 135.11 @ Green Bay Packers 42 1676.71 47.01% Chicago Bears 28 1721.82 45.90%
11 1944-10-15 132.73 @ Chicago Bears 34 1475.67 61.47% Card Pitt Carpets 7 1416.91 32.01%
12 1944-10-08 111.04 @ Cleveland Rams 19 1580.42 52.56% Chicago Bears 7 1586.71 40.44%
13 1944-10-29 107.37 Boston Yanks 17 1008.30 14.11% @ Brooklyn Tigers 14 1259.06 81.97%
14 1944-11-05 106.66 Detroit Lions 27 1415.21 64.59% @ Card Pitt Carpets 6 1234.26 29.15%
15 1944-10-29 102.71 @ Chicago Bears 28 1597.74 43.32% Cleveland Rams 21 1668.66 49.61%
16 1944-11-19 93.88 @ Boston Yanks 13 1084.02 47.86% Brooklyn Tigers 6 1123.15 45.04%
17 1944-11-19 81.46 Cleveland Rams 33 1382.11 75.22% @ Card Pitt Carpets 6 1107.84 19.78%
18 1944-10-08 65.97 @ Detroit Lions 19 1391.80 56.04% Brooklyn Tigers 14 1373.20 37.09%
19 1944-12-10 59.81 New York Giants 31 1846.38 82.42% @ Washington Redskins 0 1492.08 13.75%
20 1944-10-22 55.26 @ Green Bay Packers 30 1863.74 71.33% Cleveland Rams 21 1723.92 23.14%
21 1944-09-24 55.16 Cleveland Rams 30 1525.26 43.08% @ Card Pitt Carpets 28 1500.00 49.86%
22 1944-12-10 43.89 @ Philadelphia Eagles 26 1659.49 80.30% Cleveland Rams 13 1428.89 15.50%
23 1944-10-15 41.52 New York Giants 14 1581.28 75.20% @ Brooklyn Tigers 7 1307.23 19.80%
24 1944-11-26 34.68 Detroit Lions 26 1832.10 83.51% @ Cleveland Rams 14 1463.57 12.85%
25 1944-10-22 33.97 @ New York Giants 23 1622.80 88.02% Card Pitt Carpets 0 1284.18 9.21%