1892-93 Football League Second Division Season
132 games
Promoted
Sheffield United
via playoff
Darwen · via playoff
Relegated
Bootle
via dissolution
Biggest Overachiever
Small Heath Birmingham
10.40 points above expected
36 points · 25.60 expected points
Biggest Disappointment
Walsall Town Swifts
7.08 points below expected
13 points · 20.08 expected points
League Table
The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.
| # | Team | GP | W | D | L | Pts | GF | GA | GD | SimPts | vsSim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Small Heath Birmingham | 22 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 90 | 35 | +55 | 25.60 | +10.40 |
| 2 | Sheffield United Promoted | 22 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 35 | 62 | 19 | +43 | 25.87 | +9.13 |
| 3 | Darwen Promoted | 22 | 14 | 2 | 6 | 30 | 60 | 36 | +24 | 20.15 | +9.85 |
| 4 | Grimsby Town | 22 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 23 | 42 | 41 | +1 | 23.15 | -0.15 |
| 5 | Ardwick | 22 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 21 | 45 | 40 | +5 | 23.47 | -2.47 |
| 6 | Burton Swifts | 22 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 20 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 22.70 | -2.70 |
| 7 | Northwich Victoria | 22 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 20 | 42 | 58 | -16 | 20.81 | -0.81 |
| 8 | Bootle Dissolved | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 19 | 49 | 63 | -14 | 20.68 | -1.68 |
| 9 | Lincoln City | 22 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 45 | 51 | -6 | 21.67 | -4.67 |
| 10 | Crewe Alexandra | 22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 15 | 42 | 69 | -27 | 20.17 | -5.17 |
| 11 | Port Vale | 22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 15 | 30 | 57 | -27 | 19.66 | -4.66 |
| 12 | Walsall Town Swifts | 22 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 37 | 75 | -38 | 20.08 | -7.08 |
Notes
- Bootle resigned from the league at the end of the season and liquidated.
Form
Each team's 5-game rolling points-per-game across the season. Hot streaks push above the dashed 1.5 PPG reference line; cold spells drop below. Each team gets a distinct color; the legend below the plot lets you read off which line is which. (First 4 games of each team have no rolling window, so the lines start at game 5.)
League Race
Cumulative points across the season for each team. Highlighted teams are drawn in color (top finishers for the Title Race, bottom finishers for the Relegation Race); the rest of the league appears in light gray as context. Switch views with the buttons below.
Season Summary
Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).
| Team | Elo | Points | Avg | Luck | Percentile | Min | 5th | Q1 | Median | Q3 | 95th | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheffield United | 1867 | 35 | 25.87 | +9.13 | 99.7% | 12 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 28 | 32 | 39 |
| Small Heath Birmingham | 1864 | 36 | 25.60 | +10.40 | 100.0% | 12 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 28 | 31 | 37 |
| Grimsby Town | 1711 | 23 | 23.15 | -0.15 | 53.5% | 10 | 17 | 21 | 23 | 26 | 29 | 36 |
| Ardwick | 1690 | 21 | 23.47 | -2.47 | 29.1% | 9 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 26 | 29 | 36 |
| Darwen | 1689 | 30 | 20.15 | +9.85 | 99.7% | 8 | 14 | 18 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 33 |
| Burton Swifts | 1665 | 20 | 22.70 | -2.70 | 27.0% | 8 | 17 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 29 | 37 |
| Lincoln City | 1659 | 17 | 21.67 | -4.67 | 12.7% | 8 | 16 | 19 | 22 | 24 | 28 | 33 |
| Bootle | 1649 | 19 | 20.68 | -1.68 | 37.4% | 6 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 27 | 34 |
| Crewe Alexandra | 1612 | 15 | 20.17 | -5.17 | 10.3% | 8 | 14 | 18 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 34 |
| Northwich Victoria | 1611 | 20 | 20.81 | -0.81 | 46.6% | 6 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 27 | 35 |
| Walsall Town Swifts | 1586 | 13 | 20.08 | -7.08 | 3.3% | 6 | 14 | 18 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 34 |
| Port Vale | 1572 | 15 | 19.66 | -4.66 | 12.5% | 7 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 22 | 26 | 36 |
Head-to-Head
Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.
Beat expectations
Fell short
Within expectations
| Team | ARD | BOO | BS | CA | DAR | GT | LC | NV | PV | SU | SHB | WTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardwick | — |
1-0-1
3.14
|
0-1-1
3.02
|
1-0-1
3.09
|
1-0-1
3.44
|
0-0-2
3.09
|
1-0-1
3.05
|
1-1-0
3.08
|
2-0-0
3.15
|
0-0-2
2.20
|
0-1-1
2.53
|
2-0-0
3.29
|
| Bootle |
1-0-1
2.46
|
— |
1-0-1
2.55
|
1-0-1
2.84
|
1-0-1
2.73
|
1-0-1
2.49
|
1-0-1
2.69
|
0-0-2
2.71
|
0-2-0
2.72
|
1-0-1
2.59
|
0-0-2
2.17
|
1-1-0
2.86
|
| Burton Swifts |
1-1-0
2.58
|
1-0-1
3.05
|
— |
2-0-0
2.91
|
1-0-1
3.34
|
1-0-1
2.67
|
1-0-1
3.00
|
1-0-1
3.08
|
0-1-1
3.18
|
0-0-2
2.09
|
0-0-2
2.75
|
1-0-1
3.25
|
| Crewe Alexandra |
1-0-1
2.52
|
1-0-1
2.76
|
0-0-2
2.69
|
— |
0-1-1
2.71
|
1-0-1
2.63
|
1-1-0
2.61
|
1-0-1
2.82
|
1-0-1
2.74
|
0-0-2
1.72
|
0-0-2
2.02
|
0-1-1
2.87
|
| Darwen |
1-0-1
2.16
|
1-0-1
2.87
|
1-0-1
2.26
|
1-1-0
2.89
|
— |
2-0-0
2.36
|
1-1-0
2.73
|
1-0-1
3.09
|
2-0-0
2.49
|
1-0-1
2.47
|
1-0-1
2.26
|
2-0-0
2.34
|
| Grimsby Town |
2-0-0
2.51
|
1-0-1
3.10
|
1-0-1
2.92
|
1-0-1
2.97
|
0-0-2
3.25
|
— |
1-1-0
3.13
|
1-0-1
2.96
|
2-0-0
3.62
|
0-0-2
2.48
|
1-0-1
2.45
|
1-0-1
3.23
|
| Lincoln City |
1-0-1
2.55
|
1-0-1
2.91
|
1-0-1
2.60
|
0-1-1
2.99
|
0-1-1
2.87
|
0-1-1
2.48
|
— |
1-0-1
2.94
|
1-0-1
2.89
|
1-0-1
2.74
|
0-0-2
2.20
|
1-0-1
3.11
|
| Northwich Victoria |
0-1-1
2.53
|
2-0-0
2.89
|
1-0-1
2.52
|
1-0-1
2.79
|
1-0-1
2.51
|
1-0-1
2.64
|
1-0-1
2.66
|
— |
0-0-2
3.21
|
0-1-1
2.09
|
0-0-2
2.21
|
2-0-0
2.99
|
| Port Vale |
0-0-2
2.45
|
0-2-0
2.88
|
1-1-0
2.43
|
1-0-1
2.86
|
0-0-2
3.11
|
0-0-2
1.99
|
1-0-1
2.71
|
2-0-0
2.40
|
— |
0-0-2
2.23
|
0-0-2
1.77
|
1-0-1
2.53
|
| Sheffield United |
2-0-0
3.41
|
1-0-1
3.02
|
2-0-0
3.51
|
2-0-0
3.90
|
1-0-1
3.14
|
2-0-0
3.11
|
1-0-1
2.86
|
1-1-0
3.53
|
2-0-0
3.40
|
— |
1-1-0
2.59
|
1-1-0
4.19
|
| Small Heath Birmingham |
1-1-0
3.10
|
2-0-0
3.45
|
2-0-0
2.85
|
2-0-0
3.58
|
1-0-1
3.34
|
1-0-1
3.16
|
2-0-0
3.40
|
2-0-0
3.41
|
2-0-0
3.83
|
0-1-1
3.02
|
— |
2-0-0
3.10
|
| Walsall Town Swifts |
0-0-2
2.32
|
0-1-1
2.75
|
1-0-1
2.36
|
1-1-0
2.73
|
0-0-2
3.27
|
1-0-1
2.39
|
1-0-1
2.49
|
0-0-2
2.61
|
1-0-1
3.07
|
0-1-1
1.43
|
0-0-2
2.51
|
— |
Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential
Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).
Fit Metrics
| R² | Slope | |
|---|---|---|
| Scored | 0.77 | +4.3 |
| Allowed | 0.76 | -4.2 |
| Differential | 0.95 | +2.6 |
Scoreline Distribution
Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.76% | 2.65% | 4.17% | 3.79% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 16.29% |
| 1 | 2.65% | 6.06% | 4.55% | 5.30% | 3.03% | 3.41% | 25.00% |
| 2 | 4.17% | 4.55% | 2.27% | 4.55% | 3.03% | 1.52% | 20.08% |
| 3 | 3.79% | 5.30% | 4.55% | 1.52% | 1.14% | 1.89% | 18.18% |
| 4 | 2.27% | 3.03% | 3.03% | 1.14% | 0.76% | — | 10.23% |
| 5+ | 2.65% | 3.41% | 1.52% | 1.89% | — | 0.76% | 10.23% |
| Total | 16.29% | 25.00% | 20.08% | 18.18% | 10.23% | 10.23% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.24 | 2.24 | +0.00 |
| SD | 1.88 | 1.88 | 2.97 |
| CV | 0.84 | 0.84 | — |
| Max | 12 | 12 | +12 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -12 |
Games Played: 132
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | — | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | — | 13.64% |
| 1 | — | 9.09% | 9.09% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | 27.27% |
| 2 | 9.09% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 9.09% | — | — | 27.27% |
| 3 | 4.55% | 9.09% | — | — | — | 4.55% | 18.18% |
| 4 | — | — | 9.09% | — | — | — | 9.09% |
| 5+ | 4.55% | — | — | — | — | — | 4.55% |
| Total | 18.18% | 22.73% | 31.82% | 18.18% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.05 | 1.82 | +0.23 |
| SD | 1.62 | 1.33 | 2.39 |
| CV | 0.79 | 0.73 | — |
| Max | 7 | 5 | +7 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -3 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.55% | — | — | 9.09% | — | 4.55% | 18.18% |
| 1 | — | 4.55% | 9.09% | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | 22.73% |
| 2 | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | 4.55% | — | 9.09% | 22.73% |
| 3 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | 4.55% | 13.64% |
| 4 | — | 4.55% | — | — | 4.55% | — | 9.09% |
| 5+ | — | 9.09% | — | 4.55% | — | — | 13.64% |
| Total | 9.09% | 27.27% | 13.64% | 18.18% | 9.09% | 22.73% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.23 | 2.86 | -0.64 |
| SD | 1.88 | 2.23 | 3.17 |
| CV | 0.84 | 0.78 | — |
| Max | 7 | 8 | +6 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -7 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | 18.18% |
| 1 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | 4.55% | 18.18% |
| 2 | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | 18.18% | — | — | 31.82% |
| 3 | — | — | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | — | 13.64% |
| 4 | — | — | 9.09% | — | — | — | 9.09% |
| 5+ | — | 9.09% | — | — | — | — | 9.09% |
| Total | 9.09% | 22.73% | 27.27% | 31.82% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.14 | 2.14 | +0.00 |
| SD | 1.75 | 1.25 | 2.45 |
| CV | 0.82 | 0.58 | — |
| Max | 7 | 5 | +6 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -4 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | — | — | — | 13.64% | 4.55% | 18.18% |
| 1 | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 9.09% | 9.09% | 4.55% | 36.36% |
| 2 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | 4.55% | — | 13.64% |
| 3 | — | — | — | 4.55% | — | 4.55% | 9.09% |
| 4 | — | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | — | — | 13.64% |
| 5+ | 4.55% | — | — | — | — | 4.55% | 9.09% |
| Total | 9.09% | 18.18% | 13.64% | 13.64% | 27.27% | 18.18% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.91 | 3.14 | -1.23 |
| SD | 1.63 | 2.10 | 2.96 |
| CV | 0.85 | 0.67 | — |
| Max | 5 | 7 | +5 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -6 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | — | 9.09% |
| 1 | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | — | 4.55% | 13.64% |
| 2 | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | 27.27% |
| 3 | 4.55% | 18.18% | — | — | — | — | 22.73% |
| 4 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | 13.64% |
| 5+ | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | 4.55% | — | — | 13.64% |
| Total | 18.18% | 40.91% | 13.64% | 18.18% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.73 | 1.64 | +1.09 |
| SD | 1.78 | 1.36 | 2.31 |
| CV | 0.65 | 0.83 | — |
| Max | 7 | 5 | +5 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -4 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | 13.64% | 4.55% | — | — | — | 18.18% |
| 1 | 4.55% | — | — | 9.09% | — | 9.09% | 22.73% |
| 2 | 9.09% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | — | 18.18% |
| 3 | 13.64% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | 9.09% | 31.82% |
| 4 | 9.09% | — | — | — | — | — | 9.09% |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 36.36% | 22.73% | 13.64% | 9.09% | — | 18.18% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.91 | 1.86 | +0.05 |
| SD | 1.31 | 2.27 | 2.75 |
| CV | 0.68 | 1.22 | — |
| Max | 4 | 8 | +4 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -5 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1 | 4.55% | 9.09% | 9.09% | 13.64% | 13.64% | — | 50.00% |
| 2 | — | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | 9.09% | — | 22.73% |
| 3 | — | 4.55% | — | — | 9.09% | — | 13.64% |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5+ | — | 13.64% | — | — | — | — | 13.64% |
| Total | 4.55% | 36.36% | 13.64% | 13.64% | 31.82% | — | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.05 | 2.32 | -0.27 |
| SD | 1.40 | 1.39 | 2.23 |
| CV | 0.68 | 0.60 | — |
| Max | 5 | 4 | +4 |
| Min | 1 | 0 | -3 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 18.18% |
| 1 | 4.55% | 9.09% | 4.55% | 9.09% | — | 4.55% | 31.82% |
| 2 | — | 9.09% | — | — | 9.09% | 4.55% | 22.73% |
| 3 | — | — | 9.09% | — | — | — | 9.09% |
| 4 | — | 4.55% | — | — | — | — | 4.55% |
| 5+ | — | — | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | — | 13.64% |
| Total | 4.55% | 22.73% | 27.27% | 18.18% | 13.64% | 13.64% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.91 | 2.64 | -0.73 |
| SD | 1.63 | 1.65 | 2.57 |
| CV | 0.85 | 0.63 | — |
| Max | 5 | 6 | +3 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -6 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.55% | 4.55% | 9.09% | 9.09% | 4.55% | 9.09% | 40.91% |
| 1 | 4.55% | 4.55% | 9.09% | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | 27.27% |
| 2 | — | — | — | — | 4.55% | — | 4.55% |
| 3 | 4.55% | — | — | 4.55% | — | — | 9.09% |
| 4 | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | 18.18% |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 18.18% | 13.64% | 22.73% | 18.18% | 13.64% | 13.64% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.36 | 2.59 | -1.23 |
| SD | 1.56 | 2.28 | 3.13 |
| CV | 1.14 | 0.88 | — |
| Max | 4 | 10 | +4 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -10 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | — | 9.09% |
| 1 | 4.55% | 13.64% | — | 4.55% | — | — | 22.73% |
| 2 | 13.64% | 4.55% | — | — | — | — | 18.18% |
| 3 | 9.09% | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | — | — | 22.73% |
| 4 | 13.64% | — | 4.55% | — | — | — | 18.18% |
| 5+ | 4.55% | — | — | 4.55% | — | — | 9.09% |
| Total | 45.45% | 31.82% | 13.64% | 9.09% | — | — | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.82 | 0.86 | +1.95 |
| SD | 2.38 | 0.99 | 2.61 |
| CV | 0.85 | 1.15 | — |
| Max | 10 | 3 | +10 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -2 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | — | 4.55% | — | — | — | 4.55% |
| 1 | — | 4.55% | — | — | — | — | 4.55% |
| 2 | — | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | 9.09% |
| 3 | 4.55% | 9.09% | 18.18% | — | 4.55% | — | 36.36% |
| 4 | — | 9.09% | — | 4.55% | — | — | 13.64% |
| 5+ | 13.64% | 4.55% | 9.09% | 4.55% | — | — | 31.82% |
| Total | 18.18% | 27.27% | 36.36% | 13.64% | 4.55% | — | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 4.09 | 1.59 | +2.50 |
| SD | 2.56 | 1.10 | 3.07 |
| CV | 0.63 | 0.69 | — |
| Max | 12 | 4 | +12 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -2 |
Games Played: 22
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | — | 4.55% | 13.64% | — | 9.09% | 27.27% |
| 1 | — | 4.55% | 4.55% | 9.09% | — | 4.55% | 22.73% |
| 2 | — | 4.55% | — | 9.09% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 22.73% |
| 3 | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.55% | — | — | 18.18% |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | 4.55% | — | 4.55% |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | 4.55% | 4.55% |
| Total | 4.55% | 13.64% | 13.64% | 36.36% | 9.09% | 22.73% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.68 | 3.41 | -1.73 |
| SD | 1.55 | 2.50 | 3.17 |
| CV | 0.92 | 0.73 | — |
| Max | 6 | 12 | +3 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -12 |
Games Played: 22
Home-Field Advantage Edge
The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.
Top Overachievers & Disappointments
Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.
Biggest Overachievers
| # | Team | Actual | Sim | vsSim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Small Heath Birmingham | 36 | 25.60 | +10.40 |
| 2 | Darwen | 30 | 20.15 | +9.85 |
| 3 | Sheffield United | 35 | 25.87 | +9.13 |
| 4 | Grimsby Town | 23 | 23.15 | -0.15 |
| 5 | Northwich Victoria | 20 | 20.81 | -0.81 |
Biggest Disappointments
| # | Team | Actual | Sim | vsSim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walsall Town Swifts | 13 | 20.08 | -7.08 |
| 2 | Crewe Alexandra | 15 | 20.17 | -5.17 |
| 3 | Lincoln City | 17 | 21.67 | -4.67 |
| 4 | Port Vale | 15 | 19.66 | -4.66 |
| 5 | Burton Swifts | 20 | 22.70 | -2.70 |
Top Streaks
Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts W or D consecutively; Winless counts L or D consecutively.
Most Unlikely Winning Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheffield United | 8 | Feb 6 – Apr 12 | 1 in 748 |
| 2 | Darwen | 4 | Sep 17 – Oct 8 | 1 in 335 |
| 3 | Small Heath Birmingham | 9 | Dec 17 – Apr 1 | 1 in 251 |
| 4 | Ardwick | 4 | Sep 3 – Sep 17 | 1 in 48 |
| 5 | Burton Swifts | 4 | Sep 3 – Oct 1 | 1 in 37 |
Most Unlikely Losing Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walsall Town Swifts | 5 | Sep 3 – Oct 1 | 1 in 539 |
| 2 | Crewe Alexandra | 5 | Sep 24 – Nov 5 | 1 in 103 |
| 3 | Ardwick | 5 | Dec 24 – Feb 4 | 1 in 72 |
| 4 | Port Vale | 4 | Nov 26 – Dec 17 | 1 in 47 |
| 5 | Grimsby Town | 3 | Sep 10 – Sep 27 | 1 in 26 |
Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheffield United | 15 | Nov 26 – Apr 15 | 1 in 450 |
| 2 | Small Heath Birmingham | 9 | Dec 17 – Apr 1 | 1 in 14 |
| 3 | Ardwick | 6 | Sep 3 – Oct 1 | 1 in 10 |
| 4 | Darwen | 5 | Nov 5 – Dec 10 | 1 in 8 |
| 5 | Burton Swifts | 4 | Sep 3 – Oct 1 | 1 in 7 |
Most Unlikely Winless Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bootle | 9 | Sep 17 – Dec 3 | 1 in 41 |
| 2 | Walsall Town Swifts | 8 | Nov 26 – Feb 11 | 1 in 34 |
| 3 | Port Vale | 6 | Nov 5 – Dec 17 | 1 in 28 |
| 4 | Burton Swifts | 7 | Feb 6 – Apr 1 | 1 in 20 |
| 5 | Crewe Alexandra | 5 | Sep 24 – Nov 5 | 1 in 11 |
Finish Position Heatmap
Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small Heath Birmingham | 28.43% | 20.30% | 14.55% | 10.52% | 7.56% | 5.61% | 4.39% | 3.00% | 2.33% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 0.66% |
| Sheffield United | 30.48% | 20.00% | 13.82% | 10.21% | 7.90% | 5.60% | 4.06% | 3.02% | 2.08% | 1.49% | 0.93% | 0.41% |
| Darwen | 2.22% | 3.77% | 5.64% | 6.70% | 7.67% | 9.06% | 9.14% | 10.30% | 11.11% | 11.73% | 11.10% | 11.56% |
| Grimsby Town | 8.67% | 11.39% | 11.69% | 11.50% | 10.83% | 10.04% | 8.83% | 7.52% | 6.65% | 5.51% | 4.47% | 2.90% |
| Ardwick | 9.89% | 12.78% | 12.64% | 12.23% | 11.14% | 9.39% | 8.56% | 7.21% | 5.68% | 4.53% | 3.76% | 2.19% |
| Burton Swifts | 7.08% | 9.73% | 10.83% | 10.69% | 10.37% | 10.49% | 9.42% | 8.39% | 7.51% | 6.48% | 5.38% | 3.63% |
| Northwich Victoria | 2.64% | 4.02% | 5.74% | 6.85% | 7.89% | 8.87% | 10.23% | 10.17% | 10.75% | 11.22% | 10.82% | 10.80% |
| Bootle | 2.41% | 3.87% | 5.55% | 7.02% | 7.87% | 8.76% | 9.96% | 10.05% | 10.71% | 11.29% | 11.53% | 10.98% |
| Lincoln City | 4.08% | 5.89% | 8.21% | 9.07% | 10.01% | 10.04% | 10.07% | 10.24% | 9.23% | 8.70% | 7.46% | 7.00% |
| Crewe Alexandra | 1.66% | 3.20% | 4.09% | 5.67% | 6.96% | 7.35% | 8.85% | 9.89% | 10.93% | 12.52% | 13.35% | 15.53% |
| Port Vale | 1.16% | 2.27% | 3.60% | 4.45% | 5.41% | 7.15% | 8.08% | 9.86% | 11.26% | 12.87% | 16.13% | 17.76% |
| Walsall Town Swifts | 1.28% | 2.78% | 3.64% | 5.09% | 6.39% | 7.64% | 8.41% | 10.35% | 11.76% | 12.07% | 14.01% | 16.58% |
Points Required Per Position
The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.
Points Totals in Context
How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).
Season Trends
How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.
Edges & Scoring
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Home Edge
- Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.No Edge: under 5% * Slight Edge: 5% to 15% * Clear Edge: 15% to 25% * Strong Edge: 25% and up.
- Elo Value
- Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
- Scoring Tilt
- Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+41.67%
Strong Edge
65.15%11.36%23.48%
Elo Value
Home Edge
114 Elo
0.009 goals per Elo point
0154.14300
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+1.25 goals
Strong Home
-2+1.35+2
Title Race
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Title-Race Openness
- Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
- Title Margin
- Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.Photo Finish: under 0.15 * Tight Race: 0.15 to 0.4 * Comfortable: 0.4 to 0.75 * Runaway: 0.75 and up.
Title-Race Openness
5.0
Open
124610
Title Margin
Expected
0.05/gm
Photo Finish
00.100.5/gm
Simulation-Based Surprises
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Luck Spread
- Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.As Expected: under 2.91 * Some Luck: 2.91 to 4.37 * Lucky: 4.37 to 5.82 * Wild Swing: 5.82 and up.
- Average Finish Error
- Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.Pinpoint: under 2.21 * Close: 2.21 to 3.31 * Off: 3.31 to 4.42 * Way Off: 4.42 and up.
- Biggest Overachiever
- The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 12 typically lands.
- Biggest Underachiever
- The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 12 typically lands.
- Season Outliers
- Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.Minimal Outliers: under 12 * As Expected: 12 to 19.2 * Several Outliers: 19.2 to 26.4 * Many Outliers: 26.4 and up.
- Unexpected Relegations
- Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.As Expected: under 0.5 * A Surprise: 0.5 to 0.8 * Several Surprises: 0.8 to 1.1 * Many Surprises: 1.1 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
5.96 points
Wild Swing
03.649
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.50
Pinpoint
02.766
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.83%
99.99%
Small Heath Birmingham
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 4.17%
3.31%
Walsall Town Swifts
050
Season Outliers
Expected
4 of 12
Minimal Outliers
01.26
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
1 of 1
Several Surprises
00.41
Parity
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Gini Index
- How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.Balanced: under 0.12 * Even: 0.12 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.26 * Lopsided: 0.26 and up.
- Noll-Scully
- How much more spread out the table was than a league where every match is a coin flip. The gold line at 1 is that coin-flip baseline. Above it, real talent gaps stretched the table; below it, the league was tighter than luck alone would produce.Coin-Flip Parity: under 1 * Moderate Separation: 1 to 1.6 * Strong Separation: 1.6 to 2.2 * Wide Separation: 2.2 and up.
- Interquartile Edge
- Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.Even: under 60% * Slight Edge: 60% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 80% * Wide Edge: 80% and up.
- Best vs. Worst
- Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.Even: under 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 82% * Strong Edge: 82% to 92% * Dominant: 92% and up.
- Close Games
- Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.Few: under 30% * Some Drama: 30% to 40% * Frequent: 40% to 50% * Very Frequent: 50% and up.
- Blowouts
- Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.Rare: under 8% * Occasional: 8% to 14% * Frequent: 14% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.18
Top-Heavy
00.120.180.260.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.64
Strong Separation
01.003
Interquartile Edge
62%
Slight Edge
50%60%70%80%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
85%
Strong Edge
50%87%100%
Close Games
Expected
38%
Some Drama
0%38%100%
Blowouts
Expected
36%
Very Frequent
0%40%100%
Predictability
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Brier Score
- How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
- Matchup Imbalance
- How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.Very Even: under 0.1 * Slight Separation: 0.1 to 0.18 * Notable Separation: 0.18 to 0.28 * Lopsided: 0.28 and up.
- Strangeness
- How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
- Repeatability
- How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.Weak Carryover: under 0.3 * Some Carryover: 0.3 to 0.6 * Strong Carryover: 0.6 to 0.85 * Near-Lock: 0.85 and up.
- Upset Rate
- Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.Chalky: under 25% * As Expected: 25% to 33% * Upset-Prone: 33% to 42% * Very Upset-Prone: 42% and up.
- Clear Favorite Upset Rate
- Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.Solid Favorites: under 15% * As Expected: 15% to 25% * Shaky Favorites: 25% to 35% * Very Shaky: 35% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.49
Highly Predictable
00.542
Matchup Imbalance
0.53
Lopsided
00.10.180.280.5
Strangeness
Expected
2.72
Chaotic
01.002
Repeatability
-0.31
Weak Carryover
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
22%
Chalky
0%19%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
19%
As Expected
0%18%50%
Calibration
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Probability calibration
- An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
- Calibration slope
- Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
- Calibration error (ECE)
- The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.Well Within Noise: under 0.11 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.11 to 0.16 * Above Noise: 0.16 to 0.22 * Well Above Noise: 0.22 and up.
Probability calibration
0.11
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.71
Very Underconfident
0.07205481.001.92795
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.088
Well Within Noise
00.1080.25
Next-Season Status
Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.
| Team | Lost promotion playoff | Same level | Direct relegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Darwen | 100% | — | — |
| Sheffield United | 100% | — | — |
| Small Heath Birmingham | 100% | — | — |
| Ardwick | 35.31% | 48.53% | 16.16% |
| Grimsby Town | 31.75% | 48.72% | 19.53% |
| Burton Swifts | 27.64% | 49.36% | 23.00% |
| Lincoln City | 18.18% | 49.43% | 32.39% |
| Northwich Victoria | 12.40% | 44.01% | 43.59% |
| Bootle | 11.83% | 43.66% | 44.51% |
| Crewe Alexandra | 8.95% | 38.72% | 52.33% |
| Walsall Town Swifts | 7.70% | 37.88% | 54.42% |
| Port Vale | 7.03% | 34.95% | 58.02% |
Overall Game Log
Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Pre Elo | Opp Elo | Win % | Tie % | Loss % | Elo Δ | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1892-09-03 | Port Vale | W 5-1 | 1691 | 1691 | 62.52% | 19.91% | 17.57% | +9.9 | 2 |
| 1892-09-03 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 1-5 | 1691 | 1691 | 17.57% | 19.91% | 62.52% | -9.9 | 0 |
| 1892-09-03 | Crewe Alexandra | W 7-1 | 1691 | 1691 | 62.52% | 19.91% | 17.57% | +14.3 | 2 |
| 1892-09-03 | @ Burton Swifts | L 1-7 | 1691 | 1691 | 17.57% | 19.91% | 62.52% | -14.3 | 0 |
| 1892-09-03 | Northwich Victoria | W 2-1 | 1691 | 1691 | 62.52% | 19.91% | 17.57% | +3.1 | 2 |
| 1892-09-03 | @ Grimsby Town | L 1-2 | 1691 | 1691 | 17.57% | 19.91% | 62.52% | -3.1 | 0 |
| 1892-09-03 | Bootle | W 7-0 | 1691 | 1691 | 62.52% | 19.91% | 17.57% | +20.1 | 2 |
| 1892-09-03 | @ Ardwick | L 0-7 | 1691 | 1691 | 17.57% | 19.91% | 62.52% | -20.1 | 0 |
| 1892-09-03 | Lincoln City | W 4-2 | 1691 | 1691 | 62.52% | 19.91% | 17.57% | +4.8 | 2 |
| 1892-09-03 | @ Sheffield United | L 2-4 | 1691 | 1691 | 17.57% | 19.91% | 62.52% | -4.8 | 0 |
| 1892-09-03 | Darwen | L 1-2 | 1691 | 1568 | 71.68% | 18.74% | 9.58% | -10.7 | 0 |
| 1892-09-03 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | W 2-1 | 1568 | 1691 | 9.58% | 18.74% | 71.68% | +10.7 | 2 |
| 1892-09-10 | Sheffield United | W 2-0 | 1671 | 1696 | 60.17% | 20.06% | 19.77% | +6.9 | 2 |
| 1892-09-10 | @ Bootle | L 0-2 | 1696 | 1671 | 19.77% | 20.06% | 60.17% | -6.9 | 2 |
| 1892-09-10 | Grimsby Town | W 1-0 | 1677 | 1695 | 60.90% | 20.01% | 19.09% | +3.6 | 2 |
| 1892-09-10 | @ Crewe Alexandra | L 0-1 | 1695 | 1677 | 19.09% | 20.01% | 60.90% | -3.6 | 2 |
| 1892-09-10 | Ardwick | L 0-3 | 1688 | 1712 | 60.34% | 20.05% | 19.61% | -26.2 | 0 |
| 1892-09-10 | @ Northwich Victoria | W 3-0 | 1712 | 1688 | 19.61% | 20.05% | 60.34% | +26.2 | 4 |
| 1892-09-10 | Small Heath Birmingham | L 1-3 | 1681 | 1701 | 60.59% | 20.03% | 19.37% | -15.7 | 0 |
| 1892-09-10 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | W 3-1 | 1701 | 1681 | 19.37% | 20.03% | 60.59% | +15.7 | 4 |
| 1892-09-10 | Burton Swifts | L 2-3 | 1579 | 1706 | 48.58% | 20.33% | 31.09% | -7.0 | 2 |
| 1892-09-10 | @ Darwen | W 3-2 | 1706 | 1579 | 31.09% | 20.33% | 48.58% | +7.0 | 4 |
| 1892-09-12 | Port Vale | W 2-0 | 1738 | 1682 | 67.17% | 19.46% | 13.37% | +4.9 | 6 |
| 1892-09-12 | @ Ardwick | L 0-2 | 1682 | 1738 | 13.37% | 19.46% | 67.17% | -4.9 | 0 |
| 1892-09-17 | Port Vale | D 1-1 | 1678 | 1677 | 62.67% | 19.90% | 17.44% | -1.7 | 3 |
| 1892-09-17 | @ Bootle | D 1-1 | 1677 | 1678 | 17.44% | 19.90% | 62.67% | +1.7 | 1 |
| 1892-09-17 | Northwich Victoria | W 4-2 | 1681 | 1662 | 64.16% | 19.78% | 16.06% | +4.5 | 4 |
| 1892-09-17 | @ Crewe Alexandra | L 2-4 | 1662 | 1681 | 16.06% | 19.78% | 64.16% | -4.5 | 0 |
| 1892-09-17 | Small Heath Birmingham | W 2-0 | 1689 | 1717 | 59.90% | 20.07% | 20.03% | +7.0 | 4 |
| 1892-09-17 | @ Sheffield United | L 0-2 | 1717 | 1689 | 20.03% | 20.07% | 59.90% | -7.0 | 4 |
| 1892-09-17 | Darwen | L 0-1 | 1691 | 1572 | 71.42% | 18.79% | 9.78% | -11.3 | 2 |
| 1892-09-17 | @ Grimsby Town | W 1-0 | 1572 | 1691 | 9.78% | 18.79% | 71.42% | +11.3 | 4 |
| 1892-09-17 | Ardwick | L 2-4 | 1665 | 1743 | 54.57% | 20.27% | 25.17% | -12.7 | 0 |
| 1892-09-17 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | W 4-2 | 1743 | 1665 | 25.17% | 20.27% | 54.57% | +12.7 | 8 |
| 1892-09-24 | Lincoln City | W 4-1 | 1710 | 1687 | 64.57% | 19.74% | 15.70% | +6.9 | 6 |
| 1892-09-24 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 1-4 | 1687 | 1710 | 15.70% | 19.74% | 64.57% | -6.9 | 0 |
| 1892-09-24 | Bootle | W 2-1 | 1713 | 1677 | 65.62% | 19.64% | 14.75% | +2.7 | 6 |
| 1892-09-24 | @ Burton Swifts | L 1-2 | 1677 | 1713 | 14.75% | 19.64% | 65.62% | -2.7 | 3 |
| 1892-09-24 | Crewe Alexandra | W 4-1 | 1678 | 1685 | 61.91% | 19.95% | 18.14% | +7.9 | 3 |
| 1892-09-24 | @ Port Vale | L 1-4 | 1685 | 1678 | 18.14% | 19.95% | 61.91% | -7.9 | 4 |
| 1892-09-24 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 5-0 | 1583 | 1652 | 55.54% | 20.24% | 24.21% | +19.4 | 6 |
| 1892-09-24 | @ Darwen | L 0-5 | 1652 | 1583 | 24.21% | 20.24% | 55.54% | -19.4 | 0 |
| 1892-09-24 | Northwich Victoria | D 1-1 | 1755 | 1658 | 70.08% | 19.04% | 10.88% | -2.3 | 9 |
| 1892-09-24 | @ Ardwick | D 1-1 | 1658 | 1755 | 10.88% | 19.04% | 70.08% | +2.3 | 1 |
| 1892-09-27 | Grimsby Town | W 2-0 | 1696 | 1680 | 64.00% | 19.79% | 16.21% | +5.8 | 6 |
| 1892-09-27 | @ Sheffield United | L 0-2 | 1680 | 1696 | 16.21% | 19.79% | 64.00% | -5.8 | 2 |
| 1892-10-01 | Sheffield United | W 1-0 | 1680 | 1702 | 60.41% | 20.04% | 19.55% | +3.7 | 2 |
| 1892-10-01 | @ Lincoln City | L 0-1 | 1702 | 1680 | 19.55% | 20.04% | 60.41% | -3.6 | 6 |
| 1892-10-01 | Burton Swifts | L 2-4 | 1677 | 1715 | 58.85% | 20.12% | 21.03% | -13.6 | 4 |
| 1892-10-01 | @ Crewe Alexandra | W 4-2 | 1715 | 1677 | 21.03% | 20.12% | 58.85% | +13.6 | 8 |
| 1892-10-01 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 2-0 | 1753 | 1633 | 71.49% | 18.78% | 9.73% | +3.6 | 11 |
| 1892-10-01 | @ Ardwick | L 0-2 | 1633 | 1753 | 9.73% | 18.78% | 71.49% | -3.6 | 0 |
| 1892-10-01 | Small Heath Birmingham | W 3-2 | 1674 | 1717 | 58.34% | 20.15% | 21.51% | +3.5 | 4 |
| 1892-10-01 | @ Grimsby Town | L 2-3 | 1717 | 1674 | 21.51% | 20.15% | 58.34% | -3.5 | 6 |
| 1892-10-01 | Darwen | L 2-4 | 1686 | 1603 | 69.14% | 19.19% | 11.67% | -16.0 | 3 |
| 1892-10-01 | @ Port Vale | W 4-2 | 1603 | 1686 | 11.67% | 19.19% | 69.14% | +16.0 | 8 |
| 1892-10-01 | Bootle | W 3-2 | 1660 | 1674 | 61.23% | 19.99% | 18.78% | +3.1 | 3 |
| 1892-10-01 | @ Northwich Victoria | L 2-3 | 1674 | 1660 | 18.78% | 19.99% | 61.23% | -3.2 | 3 |
| 1892-10-03 | Small Heath Birmingham | L 2-3 | 1729 | 1713 | 63.91% | 19.80% | 16.29% | -9.1 | 8 |
| 1892-10-03 | @ Burton Swifts | W 3-2 | 1713 | 1729 | 16.29% | 19.80% | 63.91% | +9.1 | 8 |
| 1892-10-08 | Burton Swifts | W 1-0 | 1670 | 1720 | 57.64% | 20.17% | 22.19% | +4.1 | 5 |
| 1892-10-08 | @ Port Vale | L 0-1 | 1720 | 1670 | 22.19% | 20.17% | 57.64% | -4.1 | 8 |
| 1892-10-08 | Ardwick | W 3-1 | 1619 | 1757 | 47.13% | 20.33% | 32.54% | +9.2 | 10 |
| 1892-10-08 | @ Darwen | L 1-3 | 1757 | 1619 | 32.54% | 20.33% | 47.13% | -9.2 | 11 |
| 1892-10-08 | Bootle | W 3-0 | 1677 | 1671 | 63.12% | 19.86% | 17.02% | +8.8 | 6 |
| 1892-10-08 | @ Grimsby Town | L 0-3 | 1671 | 1677 | 17.02% | 19.86% | 63.12% | -8.8 | 3 |
| 1892-10-08 | Lincoln City | W 2-1 | 1629 | 1683 | 57.19% | 20.19% | 22.62% | +3.9 | 2 |
| 1892-10-08 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | L 1-2 | 1683 | 1629 | 22.62% | 20.19% | 57.19% | -3.9 | 2 |
| 1892-10-08 | Crewe Alexandra | W 6-0 | 1722 | 1664 | 67.37% | 19.43% | 13.20% | +13.3 | 10 |
| 1892-10-08 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 0-6 | 1664 | 1722 | 13.20% | 19.43% | 67.37% | -13.3 | 4 |
| 1892-10-10 | Ardwick | L 1-2 | 1674 | 1747 | 55.08% | 20.26% | 24.66% | -8.3 | 5 |
| 1892-10-10 | @ Port Vale | W 2-1 | 1747 | 1674 | 24.66% | 20.26% | 55.08% | +8.3 | 13 |
| 1892-10-15 | Darwen | W 2-0 | 1699 | 1628 | 68.23% | 19.32% | 12.45% | +4.5 | 8 |
| 1892-10-15 | @ Sheffield United | L 0-2 | 1628 | 1699 | 12.45% | 19.32% | 68.23% | -4.5 | 10 |
| 1892-10-22 | Crewe Alexandra | W 4-1 | 1663 | 1650 | 63.66% | 19.82% | 16.52% | +7.2 | 5 |
| 1892-10-22 | @ Northwich Victoria | L 1-4 | 1650 | 1663 | 16.52% | 19.82% | 63.66% | -7.2 | 4 |
| 1892-10-22 | Small Heath Birmingham | D 2-2 | 1756 | 1736 | 64.27% | 19.77% | 15.96% | -1.4 | 14 |
| 1892-10-22 | @ Ardwick | D 2-2 | 1736 | 1756 | 15.96% | 19.77% | 64.27% | +1.4 | 11 |
| 1892-10-22 | Grimsby Town | W 3-1 | 1633 | 1686 | 57.30% | 20.19% | 22.52% | +6.7 | 4 |
| 1892-10-22 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | L 1-3 | 1686 | 1633 | 22.52% | 20.19% | 57.30% | -6.7 | 6 |
| 1892-10-22 | Port Vale | L 3-4 | 1679 | 1666 | 63.71% | 19.81% | 16.48% | -8.8 | 2 |
| 1892-10-22 | @ Lincoln City | W 4-3 | 1666 | 1679 | 16.48% | 19.81% | 63.71% | +8.8 | 7 |
| 1892-10-22 | Bootle | W 3-0 | 1623 | 1662 | 58.80% | 20.13% | 21.07% | +10.7 | 12 |
| 1892-10-22 | @ Darwen | L 0-3 | 1662 | 1623 | 21.07% | 20.13% | 58.80% | -10.7 | 3 |
| 1892-10-29 | Darwen | W 3-2 | 1737 | 1634 | 70.43% | 18.98% | 10.59% | +1.8 | 13 |
| 1892-10-29 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 2-3 | 1634 | 1737 | 10.59% | 18.98% | 70.43% | -1.8 | 12 |
| 1892-11-05 | Port Vale | W 4-1 | 1632 | 1675 | 58.38% | 20.14% | 21.48% | +9.1 | 14 |
| 1892-11-05 | @ Darwen | L 1-4 | 1675 | 1632 | 21.48% | 20.14% | 58.38% | -9.1 | 7 |
| 1892-11-05 | Small Heath Birmingham | L 1-4 | 1651 | 1739 | 53.39% | 20.29% | 26.32% | -19.7 | 3 |
| 1892-11-05 | @ Bootle | W 4-1 | 1739 | 1651 | 26.32% | 20.29% | 53.39% | +19.7 | 15 |
| 1892-11-05 | Northwich Victoria | W 2-0 | 1716 | 1670 | 66.36% | 19.56% | 14.08% | +5.1 | 10 |
| 1892-11-05 | @ Burton Swifts | L 0-2 | 1670 | 1716 | 14.08% | 19.56% | 66.36% | -5.1 | 5 |
| 1892-11-05 | Walsall Town Swifts | L 5-6 | 1643 | 1640 | 62.80% | 19.89% | 17.32% | -8.5 | 4 |
| 1892-11-05 | @ Crewe Alexandra | W 6-5 | 1640 | 1643 | 17.32% | 19.89% | 62.80% | +8.5 | 6 |
| 1892-11-05 | Ardwick | W 2-0 | 1680 | 1754 | 54.88% | 20.26% | 24.85% | +8.5 | 8 |
| 1892-11-05 | @ Grimsby Town | L 0-2 | 1754 | 1680 | 24.85% | 20.26% | 54.88% | -8.5 | 14 |
| 1892-11-12 | Darwen | D 1-1 | 1671 | 1641 | 65.05% | 19.69% | 15.26% | -1.9 | 3 |
| 1892-11-12 | @ Lincoln City | D 1-1 | 1641 | 1671 | 15.26% | 19.69% | 65.05% | +1.9 | 15 |
| 1892-11-12 | Burton Swifts | W 3-2 | 1759 | 1721 | 65.73% | 19.62% | 14.64% | +2.5 | 17 |
| 1892-11-12 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 2-3 | 1721 | 1759 | 14.64% | 19.62% | 65.73% | -2.5 | 10 |
| 1892-11-12 | Bootle | D 0-0 | 1666 | 1632 | 65.45% | 19.65% | 14.90% | -2.2 | 8 |
| 1892-11-12 | @ Port Vale | D 0-0 | 1632 | 1666 | 14.90% | 19.65% | 65.45% | +2.2 | 4 |
| 1892-11-19 | Sheffield United | W 3-1 | 1643 | 1703 | 56.56% | 20.21% | 23.23% | +6.9 | 17 |
| 1892-11-19 | @ Darwen | L 1-3 | 1703 | 1643 | 23.23% | 20.21% | 56.56% | -6.9 | 8 |
| 1892-11-26 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 5-2 | 1665 | 1649 | 64.00% | 19.79% | 16.21% | +6.2 | 7 |
| 1892-11-26 | @ Northwich Victoria | L 2-5 | 1649 | 1665 | 16.21% | 19.79% | 64.00% | -6.2 | 6 |
| 1892-11-26 | Bootle | W 8-3 | 1696 | 1634 | 67.63% | 19.40% | 12.97% | +6.9 | 10 |
| 1892-11-26 | @ Sheffield United | L 3-8 | 1634 | 1696 | 12.97% | 19.40% | 67.63% | -6.9 | 4 |
| 1892-11-26 | Burton Swifts | D 1-1 | 1746 | 1719 | 64.89% | 19.71% | 15.40% | -1.9 | 15 |
| 1892-11-26 | @ Ardwick | D 1-1 | 1719 | 1746 | 15.40% | 19.71% | 64.89% | +1.9 | 11 |
| 1892-11-26 | Port Vale | W 5-0 | 1635 | 1664 | 59.77% | 20.08% | 20.16% | +16.5 | 6 |
| 1892-11-26 | @ Crewe Alexandra | L 0-5 | 1664 | 1635 | 20.16% | 20.08% | 59.77% | -16.5 | 8 |
| 1892-12-03 | Northwich Victoria | L 2-5 | 1627 | 1671 | 58.19% | 20.15% | 21.66% | -18.5 | 4 |
| 1892-12-03 | @ Bootle | W 5-2 | 1671 | 1627 | 21.66% | 20.15% | 58.19% | +18.5 | 9 |
| 1892-12-03 | Lincoln City | L 1-2 | 1647 | 1669 | 60.49% | 20.04% | 19.47% | -9.1 | 8 |
| 1892-12-03 | @ Port Vale | W 2-1 | 1669 | 1647 | 19.47% | 20.04% | 60.49% | +9.0 | 5 |
| 1892-12-03 | Crewe Alexandra | W 7-3 | 1650 | 1651 | 62.44% | 19.91% | 17.64% | +7.7 | 19 |
| 1892-12-03 | @ Darwen | L 3-7 | 1651 | 1650 | 17.64% | 19.91% | 62.44% | -7.7 | 6 |
| 1892-12-03 | Sheffield United | D 1-1 | 1761 | 1703 | 67.32% | 19.44% | 13.24% | -2.1 | 18 |
| 1892-12-03 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | D 1-1 | 1703 | 1761 | 13.24% | 19.44% | 67.32% | +2.1 | 11 |
| 1892-12-03 | Burton Swifts | W 4-0 | 1688 | 1720 | 59.42% | 20.10% | 20.48% | +13.6 | 10 |
| 1892-12-03 | @ Grimsby Town | L 0-4 | 1720 | 1688 | 20.48% | 20.10% | 59.42% | -13.6 | 11 |
| 1892-12-10 | Small Heath Birmingham | W 4-3 | 1658 | 1759 | 51.78% | 20.32% | 27.91% | +4.3 | 21 |
| 1892-12-10 | @ Darwen | L 3-4 | 1759 | 1658 | 27.91% | 20.32% | 51.78% | -4.3 | 18 |
| 1892-12-10 | Sheffield United | L 0-10 | 1638 | 1705 | 55.75% | 20.24% | 24.02% | -75.6 | 8 |
| 1892-12-10 | @ Port Vale | W 10-0 | 1705 | 1638 | 24.02% | 20.24% | 55.75% | +75.6 | 13 |
| 1892-12-17 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 12-0 | 1755 | 1642 | 71.02% | 18.87% | 10.11% | +20.0 | 20 |
| 1892-12-17 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 0-12 | 1642 | 1755 | 10.11% | 18.87% | 71.02% | -20.0 | 6 |
| 1892-12-17 | Lincoln City | W 4-2 | 1707 | 1678 | 65.04% | 19.69% | 15.27% | +4.3 | 13 |
| 1892-12-17 | @ Burton Swifts | L 2-4 | 1678 | 1707 | 15.27% | 19.69% | 65.04% | -4.3 | 5 |
| 1892-12-17 | Grimsby Town | W 3-1 | 1608 | 1702 | 52.74% | 20.30% | 26.95% | +7.8 | 6 |
| 1892-12-17 | @ Bootle | L 1-3 | 1702 | 1608 | 26.95% | 20.30% | 52.74% | -7.8 | 10 |
| 1892-12-17 | Darwen | W 4-2 | 1744 | 1662 | 69.01% | 19.21% | 11.78% | +3.3 | 17 |
| 1892-12-17 | @ Ardwick | L 2-4 | 1662 | 1744 | 11.78% | 19.21% | 69.01% | -3.3 | 21 |
| 1892-12-17 | Port Vale | W 4-0 | 1781 | 1562 | 76.64% | 17.44% | 5.92% | +4.1 | 15 |
| 1892-12-17 | @ Sheffield United | L 0-4 | 1562 | 1781 | 5.92% | 17.44% | 76.64% | -4.1 | 8 |
| 1892-12-24 | Crewe Alexandra | W 4-0 | 1694 | 1643 | 66.72% | 19.51% | 13.76% | +9.5 | 12 |
| 1892-12-24 | @ Grimsby Town | L 0-4 | 1643 | 1694 | 13.76% | 19.51% | 66.72% | -9.5 | 6 |
| 1892-12-24 | Bootle | D 4-4 | 1622 | 1616 | 63.07% | 19.87% | 17.06% | -1.0 | 7 |
| 1892-12-24 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | D 4-4 | 1616 | 1622 | 17.06% | 19.87% | 63.07% | +1.0 | 7 |
| 1892-12-24 | Ardwick | W 2-1 | 1674 | 1747 | 55.00% | 20.26% | 24.74% | +4.2 | 7 |
| 1892-12-24 | @ Lincoln City | L 1-2 | 1747 | 1674 | 24.74% | 20.26% | 55.00% | -4.2 | 17 |
| 1892-12-24 | Small Heath Birmingham | L 0-6 | 1690 | 1775 | 53.72% | 20.29% | 25.99% | -44.9 | 9 |
| 1892-12-24 | @ Northwich Victoria | W 6-0 | 1775 | 1690 | 25.99% | 20.29% | 53.72% | +44.9 | 22 |
| 1892-12-24 | Darwen | L 0-2 | 1711 | 1659 | 66.87% | 19.50% | 13.63% | -20.0 | 13 |
| 1892-12-24 | @ Burton Swifts | W 2-0 | 1659 | 1711 | 13.63% | 19.50% | 66.87% | +20.0 | 23 |
| 1892-12-26 | Crewe Alexandra | D 1-1 | 1678 | 1634 | 66.22% | 19.57% | 14.21% | -2.0 | 8 |
| 1892-12-26 | @ Lincoln City | D 1-1 | 1634 | 1678 | 14.21% | 19.57% | 66.22% | +2.0 | 7 |
| 1892-12-31 | Lincoln City | W 2-1 | 1645 | 1676 | 59.60% | 20.09% | 20.31% | +3.6 | 11 |
| 1892-12-31 | @ Northwich Victoria | L 1-2 | 1676 | 1645 | 20.31% | 20.09% | 59.60% | -3.5 | 8 |
| 1892-12-31 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 3-0 | 1558 | 1621 | 56.19% | 20.22% | 23.58% | +11.8 | 10 |
| 1892-12-31 | @ Port Vale | L 0-3 | 1621 | 1558 | 23.58% | 20.22% | 56.19% | -11.8 | 7 |
| 1892-12-31 | Darwen | W 5-1 | 1617 | 1679 | 56.35% | 20.22% | 23.43% | +12.7 | 9 |
| 1892-12-31 | @ Bootle | L 1-5 | 1679 | 1617 | 23.43% | 20.22% | 56.35% | -12.7 | 23 |
| 1892-12-31 | Small Heath Birmingham | L 1-3 | 1636 | 1820 | 40.85% | 20.25% | 38.90% | -11.0 | 7 |
| 1892-12-31 | @ Crewe Alexandra | W 3-1 | 1820 | 1636 | 38.90% | 20.25% | 40.85% | +11.0 | 24 |
| 1893-01-07 | Bootle | W 2-1 | 1625 | 1630 | 62.07% | 19.94% | 17.99% | +3.2 | 9 |
| 1893-01-07 | @ Crewe Alexandra | L 1-2 | 1630 | 1625 | 17.99% | 19.94% | 62.07% | -3.2 | 9 |
| 1893-01-07 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 3-0 | 1785 | 1610 | 74.57% | 18.07% | 7.36% | +3.9 | 17 |
| 1893-01-07 | @ Sheffield United | L 0-3 | 1610 | 1785 | 7.36% | 18.07% | 74.57% | -3.9 | 7 |
| 1893-01-07 | Small Heath Birmingham | L 3-4 | 1672 | 1831 | 44.35% | 20.31% | 35.34% | -6.3 | 8 |
| 1893-01-07 | @ Lincoln City | W 4-3 | 1831 | 1672 | 35.34% | 20.31% | 44.35% | +6.3 | 26 |
| 1893-01-07 | Grimsby Town | W 5-3 | 1649 | 1703 | 57.12% | 20.19% | 22.69% | +5.7 | 13 |
| 1893-01-07 | @ Northwich Victoria | L 3-5 | 1703 | 1649 | 22.69% | 20.19% | 57.12% | -5.7 | 12 |
| 1893-01-14 | Port Vale | W 2-0 | 1697 | 1570 | 71.93% | 18.69% | 9.37% | +3.5 | 14 |
| 1893-01-14 | @ Grimsby Town | L 0-2 | 1570 | 1697 | 9.37% | 18.69% | 71.93% | -3.4 | 10 |
| 1893-01-14 | Northwich Victoria | W 6-2 | 1837 | 1654 | 74.94% | 17.96% | 7.09% | +3.5 | 28 |
| 1893-01-14 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 2-6 | 1654 | 1837 | 7.09% | 17.96% | 74.94% | -3.5 | 13 |
| 1893-01-14 | Ardwick | W 2-0 | 1691 | 1743 | 57.40% | 20.18% | 22.42% | +7.8 | 15 |
| 1893-01-14 | @ Burton Swifts | L 0-2 | 1743 | 1691 | 22.42% | 20.18% | 57.40% | -7.8 | 17 |
| 1893-01-14 | Crewe Alexandra | D 3-3 | 1606 | 1628 | 60.41% | 20.04% | 19.54% | -1.0 | 8 |
| 1893-01-14 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | D 3-3 | 1628 | 1606 | 19.54% | 20.04% | 60.41% | +1.0 | 10 |
| 1893-01-14 | Lincoln City | W 3-1 | 1666 | 1666 | 62.55% | 19.90% | 17.54% | +5.4 | 25 |
| 1893-01-14 | @ Darwen | L 1-3 | 1666 | 1666 | 17.54% | 19.90% | 62.55% | -5.4 | 8 |
| 1893-01-21 | Ardwick | W 5-3 | 1627 | 1735 | 50.87% | 20.32% | 28.80% | +7.0 | 11 |
| 1893-01-21 | @ Bootle | L 3-5 | 1735 | 1627 | 28.80% | 20.32% | 50.87% | -7.0 | 17 |
| 1893-01-23 | Northwich Victoria | D 1-1 | 1789 | 1651 | 72.55% | 18.56% | 8.89% | -2.5 | 18 |
| 1893-01-23 | @ Sheffield United | D 1-1 | 1651 | 1789 | 8.89% | 18.56% | 72.55% | +2.5 | 14 |
| 1893-01-28 | Lincoln City | W 4-1 | 1629 | 1660 | 59.53% | 20.09% | 20.38% | +8.7 | 12 |
| 1893-01-28 | @ Crewe Alexandra | L 1-4 | 1660 | 1629 | 20.38% | 20.09% | 59.53% | -8.7 | 8 |
| 1893-01-30 | Grimsby Town | L 0-3 | 1728 | 1701 | 64.90% | 19.71% | 15.39% | -28.2 | 17 |
| 1893-01-30 | @ Ardwick | W 3-0 | 1701 | 1728 | 15.39% | 19.71% | 64.90% | +28.2 | 16 |
| 1893-02-04 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 3-2 | 1699 | 1605 | 69.85% | 19.08% | 11.08% | +1.9 | 17 |
| 1893-02-04 | @ Burton Swifts | L 2-3 | 1605 | 1699 | 11.08% | 19.08% | 69.85% | -1.9 | 8 |
| 1893-02-04 | Ardwick | W 4-1 | 1638 | 1700 | 56.28% | 20.22% | 23.49% | +9.9 | 14 |
| 1893-02-04 | @ Crewe Alexandra | L 1-4 | 1700 | 1638 | 23.49% | 20.22% | 56.28% | -9.9 | 17 |
| 1893-02-06 | Burton Swifts | W 3-1 | 1786 | 1701 | 69.27% | 19.17% | 11.56% | +3.7 | 20 |
| 1893-02-06 | @ Sheffield United | L 1-3 | 1701 | 1786 | 11.56% | 19.17% | 69.27% | -3.7 | 17 |
| 1893-02-11 | Burton Swifts | W 5-1 | 1652 | 1697 | 58.10% | 20.16% | 21.75% | +11.9 | 10 |
| 1893-02-11 | @ Lincoln City | L 1-5 | 1697 | 1652 | 21.75% | 20.16% | 58.10% | -11.9 | 17 |
| 1893-02-11 | Northwich Victoria | L 2-3 | 1603 | 1653 | 57.55% | 20.18% | 22.27% | -8.2 | 8 |
| 1893-02-11 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | W 3-2 | 1653 | 1603 | 22.27% | 20.18% | 57.55% | +8.2 | 16 |
| 1893-02-11 | Grimsby Town | L 0-1 | 1567 | 1729 | 43.81% | 20.30% | 35.89% | -7.2 | 10 |
| 1893-02-11 | @ Port Vale | W 1-0 | 1729 | 1567 | 35.89% | 20.30% | 43.81% | +7.1 | 18 |
| 1893-02-14 | Northwich Victoria | W 3-1 | 1672 | 1662 | 63.42% | 19.84% | 16.74% | +5.2 | 27 |
| 1893-02-14 | @ Darwen | L 1-3 | 1662 | 1672 | 16.74% | 19.84% | 63.42% | -5.2 | 16 |
| 1893-02-18 | Lincoln City | D 2-2 | 1736 | 1664 | 68.37% | 19.30% | 12.33% | -1.6 | 19 |
| 1893-02-18 | @ Grimsby Town | D 2-2 | 1664 | 1736 | 12.33% | 19.30% | 68.37% | +1.6 | 11 |
| 1893-02-18 | Port Vale | W 3-0 | 1595 | 1560 | 65.54% | 19.64% | 14.82% | +7.8 | 10 |
| 1893-02-18 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | L 0-3 | 1560 | 1595 | 14.82% | 19.64% | 65.54% | -7.8 | 10 |
| 1893-02-18 | Bootle | W 6-2 | 1840 | 1634 | 76.11% | 17.62% | 6.28% | +3.1 | 30 |
| 1893-02-18 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 2-6 | 1634 | 1840 | 6.28% | 17.62% | 76.11% | -3.1 | 11 |
| 1893-02-18 | Crewe Alexandra | W 3-1 | 1690 | 1648 | 66.12% | 19.58% | 14.30% | +4.5 | 19 |
| 1893-02-18 | @ Ardwick | L 1-3 | 1648 | 1690 | 14.30% | 19.58% | 66.12% | -4.5 | 14 |
| 1893-02-18 | Sheffield United | L 1-3 | 1656 | 1790 | 47.67% | 20.33% | 31.99% | -12.6 | 16 |
| 1893-02-18 | @ Northwich Victoria | W 3-1 | 1790 | 1656 | 31.99% | 20.33% | 47.67% | +12.5 | 22 |
| 1893-02-25 | Burton Swifts | W 3-2 | 1631 | 1685 | 57.13% | 20.19% | 22.68% | +3.7 | 13 |
| 1893-02-25 | @ Bootle | L 2-3 | 1685 | 1631 | 22.68% | 20.19% | 57.13% | -3.7 | 17 |
| 1893-02-25 | Grimsby Town | W 8-3 | 1844 | 1735 | 70.81% | 18.91% | 10.28% | +5.5 | 32 |
| 1893-02-25 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 3-8 | 1735 | 1844 | 10.28% | 18.91% | 70.81% | -5.5 | 19 |
| 1893-02-25 | Darwen | D 2-2 | 1643 | 1677 | 59.31% | 20.10% | 20.58% | -1.1 | 15 |
| 1893-02-25 | @ Crewe Alexandra | D 2-2 | 1677 | 1643 | 20.58% | 20.10% | 59.31% | +1.1 | 28 |
| 1893-02-25 | Northwich Victoria | W 5-1 | 1665 | 1644 | 64.41% | 19.75% | 15.84% | +9.0 | 13 |
| 1893-02-25 | @ Lincoln City | L 1-5 | 1644 | 1665 | 15.84% | 19.75% | 64.41% | -9.0 | 16 |
| 1893-03-04 | Grimsby Town | L 1-3 | 1674 | 1729 | 57.10% | 20.19% | 22.71% | -14.8 | 13 |
| 1893-03-04 | @ Lincoln City | W 3-1 | 1729 | 1674 | 22.71% | 20.19% | 57.10% | +14.8 | 21 |
| 1893-03-04 | Sheffield United | L 2-3 | 1695 | 1803 | 50.95% | 20.32% | 28.72% | -7.3 | 19 |
| 1893-03-04 | @ Ardwick | W 3-2 | 1803 | 1695 | 28.72% | 20.32% | 50.95% | +7.3 | 24 |
| 1893-03-04 | Northwich Victoria | W 4-0 | 1552 | 1635 | 53.93% | 20.28% | 25.79% | +16.6 | 12 |
| 1893-03-04 | @ Port Vale | L 0-4 | 1635 | 1552 | 25.79% | 20.28% | 53.93% | -16.6 | 16 |
| 1893-03-04 | Burton Swifts | W 3-2 | 1602 | 1682 | 54.40% | 20.27% | 25.33% | +4.1 | 12 |
| 1893-03-04 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | L 2-3 | 1682 | 1602 | 25.33% | 20.27% | 54.40% | -4.1 | 17 |
| 1893-03-18 | Crewe Alexandra | W 4-0 | 1810 | 1642 | 74.18% | 18.17% | 7.65% | +5.3 | 26 |
| 1893-03-18 | @ Sheffield United | L 0-4 | 1642 | 1810 | 7.65% | 18.17% | 74.18% | -5.3 | 15 |
| 1893-03-18 | Grimsby Town | W 6-1 | 1678 | 1744 | 55.86% | 20.23% | 23.90% | +15.9 | 30 |
| 1893-03-18 | @ Darwen | L 1-6 | 1744 | 1678 | 23.90% | 20.23% | 55.86% | -15.9 | 21 |
| 1893-03-18 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 7-1 | 1634 | 1607 | 64.94% | 19.70% | 15.36% | +12.7 | 15 |
| 1893-03-18 | @ Bootle | L 1-7 | 1607 | 1634 | 15.36% | 19.70% | 64.94% | -12.7 | 12 |
| 1893-03-18 | Port Vale | D 3-3 | 1677 | 1568 | 70.82% | 18.91% | 10.28% | -1.5 | 18 |
| 1893-03-18 | @ Burton Swifts | D 3-3 | 1568 | 1677 | 10.28% | 18.91% | 70.82% | +1.5 | 13 |
| 1893-03-25 | Burton Swifts | W 2-1 | 1618 | 1676 | 56.79% | 20.21% | 23.01% | +4.0 | 18 |
| 1893-03-25 | @ Northwich Victoria | L 1-2 | 1676 | 1618 | 23.01% | 20.21% | 56.79% | -4.0 | 18 |
| 1893-03-25 | Ardwick | W 2-1 | 1815 | 1687 | 71.96% | 18.69% | 9.36% | +1.7 | 28 |
| 1893-03-25 | @ Sheffield United | L 1-2 | 1687 | 1815 | 9.36% | 18.69% | 71.96% | -1.7 | 19 |
| 1893-03-25 | Crewe Alexandra | W 2-1 | 1647 | 1637 | 63.44% | 19.84% | 16.72% | +3.0 | 17 |
| 1893-03-25 | @ Bootle | L 1-2 | 1637 | 1647 | 16.72% | 19.84% | 63.44% | -3.0 | 15 |
| 1893-03-25 | Small Heath Birmingham | L 0-3 | 1570 | 1849 | 28.24% | 19.72% | 52.03% | -13.6 | 13 |
| 1893-03-25 | @ Port Vale | W 3-0 | 1849 | 1570 | 52.03% | 19.72% | 28.24% | +13.6 | 34 |
| 1893-03-31 | Sheffield United | L 0-1 | 1728 | 1817 | 53.25% | 20.29% | 26.45% | -8.5 | 21 |
| 1893-03-31 | @ Grimsby Town | W 1-0 | 1817 | 1728 | 26.45% | 20.29% | 53.25% | +8.5 | 30 |
| 1893-03-31 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 3-1 | 1660 | 1594 | 67.87% | 19.37% | 12.76% | +4.0 | 15 |
| 1893-03-31 | @ Lincoln City | L 1-3 | 1594 | 1660 | 12.76% | 19.37% | 67.87% | -4.0 | 12 |
| 1893-04-01 | Bootle | W 5-1 | 1664 | 1650 | 63.72% | 19.81% | 16.47% | +9.3 | 17 |
| 1893-04-01 | @ Lincoln City | L 1-5 | 1650 | 1664 | 16.47% | 19.81% | 63.72% | -9.3 | 17 |
| 1893-04-01 | Ardwick | W 3-2 | 1863 | 1686 | 74.66% | 18.04% | 7.30% | +1.3 | 36 |
| 1893-04-01 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | L 2-3 | 1686 | 1863 | 7.30% | 18.04% | 74.66% | -1.3 | 19 |
| 1893-04-01 | Sheffield United | L 0-3 | 1672 | 1825 | 45.04% | 20.31% | 34.65% | -20.0 | 18 |
| 1893-04-01 | @ Burton Swifts | W 3-0 | 1825 | 1672 | 34.65% | 20.31% | 45.04% | +20.0 | 32 |
| 1893-04-01 | Walsall Town Swifts | W 3-0 | 1720 | 1590 | 72.07% | 18.66% | 9.27% | +5.0 | 23 |
| 1893-04-01 | @ Grimsby Town | L 0-3 | 1590 | 1720 | 9.27% | 18.66% | 72.07% | -4.9 | 12 |
| 1893-04-08 | Grimsby Town | W 5-1 | 1652 | 1725 | 55.13% | 20.25% | 24.61% | +13.3 | 20 |
| 1893-04-08 | @ Burton Swifts | L 1-5 | 1725 | 1652 | 24.61% | 20.25% | 55.13% | -13.3 | 23 |
| 1893-04-08 | Lincoln City | W 3-1 | 1684 | 1673 | 63.56% | 19.83% | 16.62% | +5.1 | 21 |
| 1893-04-08 | @ Ardwick | L 1-3 | 1673 | 1684 | 16.62% | 19.83% | 63.56% | -5.1 | 17 |
| 1893-04-08 | Port Vale | L 2-4 | 1622 | 1556 | 67.90% | 19.37% | 12.73% | -15.7 | 18 |
| 1893-04-08 | @ Northwich Victoria | W 4-2 | 1556 | 1622 | 12.73% | 19.37% | 67.90% | +15.7 | 15 |
| 1893-04-12 | Sheffield United | L 0-4 | 1634 | 1845 | 36.93% | 20.14% | 42.93% | -22.2 | 15 |
| 1893-04-12 | @ Crewe Alexandra | W 4-0 | 1845 | 1634 | 42.93% | 20.14% | 36.93% | +22.2 | 34 |
| 1893-04-15 | Sheffield United | D 1-1 | 1585 | 1868 | 27.84% | 19.70% | 52.47% | +0.9 | 13 |
| 1893-04-15 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | D 1-1 | 1868 | 1585 | 52.47% | 19.70% | 27.84% | -0.9 | 35 |
| 1893-04-15 | Lincoln City | W 4-1 | 1641 | 1668 | 59.97% | 20.07% | 19.96% | +8.6 | 19 |
| 1893-04-15 | @ Bootle | L 1-4 | 1668 | 1641 | 19.96% | 20.07% | 59.97% | -8.6 | 17 |
| 1893-04-15 | Darwen | W 1-0 | 1607 | 1694 | 53.45% | 20.29% | 26.26% | +4.7 | 20 |
| 1893-04-15 | @ Northwich Victoria | L 0-1 | 1694 | 1607 | 26.26% | 20.29% | 53.45% | -4.7 | 30 |
Biggest Upsets
The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.
| # | Date | Underdog Win % | Winning Team | Losing Team | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Elo | Score | Team | Elo | Score | |||
| 1 | 1892-09-03 | 9.58% | Darwen | 1568 | 2 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | 1691 | 1 |
| 2 | 1892-09-17 | 9.78% | Darwen | 1572 | 1 | @ Grimsby Town | 1691 | 0 |
| 3 | 1892-10-01 | 11.67% | Darwen | 1603 | 4 | @ Port Vale | 1686 | 2 |
| 4 | 1893-04-08 | 12.73% | Port Vale | 1556 | 4 | @ Northwich Victoria | 1622 | 2 |
| 5 | 1892-12-24 | 13.63% | Darwen | 1659 | 2 | @ Burton Swifts | 1711 | 0 |
| 6 | 1893-01-30 | 15.39% | Grimsby Town | 1701 | 3 | @ Ardwick | 1728 | 0 |
| 7 | 1892-10-03 | 16.29% | Small Heath Birmingham | 1713 | 3 | @ Burton Swifts | 1729 | 2 |
| 8 | 1892-10-22 | 16.48% | Port Vale | 1666 | 4 | @ Lincoln City | 1679 | 3 |
| 9 | 1892-11-05 | 17.32% | Walsall Town Swifts | 1640 | 6 | @ Crewe Alexandra | 1643 | 5 |
| 10 | 1892-09-10 | 19.37% | Small Heath Birmingham | 1701 | 3 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | 1681 | 1 |
| 11 | 1892-12-03 | 19.47% | Lincoln City | 1669 | 2 | @ Port Vale | 1647 | 1 |
| 12 | 1892-09-10 | 19.61% | Ardwick | 1712 | 3 | @ Northwich Victoria | 1688 | 0 |
| 13 | 1892-10-01 | 21.03% | Burton Swifts | 1715 | 4 | @ Crewe Alexandra | 1677 | 2 |
| 14 | 1892-12-03 | 21.66% | Northwich Victoria | 1671 | 5 | @ Bootle | 1627 | 2 |
| 15 | 1893-02-11 | 22.27% | Northwich Victoria | 1653 | 3 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | 1603 | 2 |
| 16 | 1893-03-04 | 22.71% | Grimsby Town | 1729 | 3 | @ Lincoln City | 1674 | 1 |
| 17 | 1892-12-10 | 24.02% | Sheffield United | 1705 | 10 | @ Port Vale | 1638 | 0 |
| 18 | 1892-10-10 | 24.66% | Ardwick | 1747 | 2 | @ Port Vale | 1674 | 1 |
| 19 | 1892-09-17 | 25.17% | Ardwick | 1743 | 4 | @ Walsall Town Swifts | 1665 | 2 |
| 20 | 1892-12-24 | 25.99% | Small Heath Birmingham | 1775 | 6 | @ Northwich Victoria | 1690 | 0 |
| 21 | 1892-11-05 | 26.32% | Small Heath Birmingham | 1739 | 4 | @ Bootle | 1651 | 1 |
| 22 | 1893-03-31 | 26.45% | Sheffield United | 1817 | 1 | @ Grimsby Town | 1728 | 0 |
| 23 | 1893-03-04 | 28.72% | Sheffield United | 1803 | 3 | @ Ardwick | 1695 | 2 |
| 24 | 1892-09-10 | 31.09% | Burton Swifts | 1706 | 3 | @ Darwen | 1579 | 2 |
| 25 | 1893-02-18 | 31.99% | Sheffield United | 1790 | 3 | @ Northwich Victoria | 1656 | 1 |
Biggest Elo Changes
The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.
| # | Date | Elo Δ | Winning Team | Losing Team | Tie % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Score | Elo | Win % | Team | Score | Elo | Win % | ||||
| 1 | 1892-12-10 | 75.63 | Sheffield United | 10 | 1705 | 24.02% | @ Port Vale | 0 | 1638 | 55.75% | 20.24% |
| 2 | 1892-12-24 | 44.85 | Small Heath Birmingham | 6 | 1775 | 25.99% | @ Northwich Victoria | 0 | 1690 | 53.72% | 20.29% |
| 3 | 1893-01-30 | 28.18 | Grimsby Town | 3 | 1701 | 15.39% | @ Ardwick | 0 | 1728 | 64.90% | 19.71% |
| 4 | 1892-09-10 | 26.21 | Ardwick | 3 | 1712 | 19.61% | @ Northwich Victoria | 0 | 1688 | 60.34% | 20.05% |
| 5 | 1893-04-12 | 22.23 | Sheffield United | 4 | 1845 | 42.93% | @ Crewe Alexandra | 0 | 1634 | 36.93% | 20.14% |
| 6 | 1892-09-03 | 20.09 | @ Ardwick | 7 | 1691 | 62.52% | Bootle | 0 | 1691 | 17.57% | 19.91% |
| 7 | 1893-04-01 | 20.04 | Sheffield United | 3 | 1825 | 34.65% | @ Burton Swifts | 0 | 1672 | 45.04% | 20.31% |
| 8 | 1892-12-17 | 20.03 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | 12 | 1755 | 71.02% | Walsall Town Swifts | 0 | 1642 | 10.11% | 18.87% |
| 9 | 1892-12-24 | 20.00 | Darwen | 2 | 1659 | 13.63% | @ Burton Swifts | 0 | 1711 | 66.87% | 19.50% |
| 10 | 1892-11-05 | 19.67 | Small Heath Birmingham | 4 | 1739 | 26.32% | @ Bootle | 1 | 1651 | 53.39% | 20.29% |
| 11 | 1892-09-24 | 19.36 | @ Darwen | 5 | 1583 | 55.54% | Walsall Town Swifts | 0 | 1652 | 24.21% | 20.24% |
| 12 | 1892-12-03 | 18.48 | Northwich Victoria | 5 | 1671 | 21.66% | @ Bootle | 2 | 1627 | 58.19% | 20.15% |
| 13 | 1893-03-04 | 16.57 | @ Port Vale | 4 | 1552 | 53.93% | Northwich Victoria | 0 | 1635 | 25.79% | 20.28% |
| 14 | 1892-11-26 | 16.51 | @ Crewe Alexandra | 5 | 1635 | 59.77% | Port Vale | 0 | 1664 | 20.16% | 20.08% |
| 15 | 1892-10-01 | 16.01 | Darwen | 4 | 1603 | 11.67% | @ Port Vale | 2 | 1686 | 69.14% | 19.19% |
| 16 | 1893-03-18 | 15.86 | @ Darwen | 6 | 1678 | 55.86% | Grimsby Town | 1 | 1744 | 23.90% | 20.23% |
| 17 | 1893-04-08 | 15.73 | Port Vale | 4 | 1556 | 12.73% | @ Northwich Victoria | 2 | 1622 | 67.90% | 19.37% |
| 18 | 1892-09-10 | 15.70 | Small Heath Birmingham | 3 | 1701 | 19.37% | @ Walsall Town Swifts | 1 | 1681 | 60.59% | 20.03% |
| 19 | 1893-03-04 | 14.82 | Grimsby Town | 3 | 1729 | 22.71% | @ Lincoln City | 1 | 1674 | 57.10% | 20.19% |
| 20 | 1892-09-03 | 14.32 | @ Burton Swifts | 7 | 1691 | 62.52% | Crewe Alexandra | 1 | 1691 | 17.57% | 19.91% |
| 21 | 1892-10-01 | 13.65 | Burton Swifts | 4 | 1715 | 21.03% | @ Crewe Alexandra | 2 | 1677 | 58.85% | 20.12% |
| 22 | 1892-12-03 | 13.59 | @ Grimsby Town | 4 | 1688 | 59.42% | Burton Swifts | 0 | 1720 | 20.48% | 20.10% |
| 23 | 1893-03-25 | 13.58 | Small Heath Birmingham | 3 | 1849 | 52.03% | @ Port Vale | 0 | 1570 | 28.24% | 19.72% |
| 24 | 1892-10-08 | 13.32 | @ Small Heath Birmingham | 6 | 1722 | 67.37% | Crewe Alexandra | 0 | 1664 | 13.20% | 19.43% |
| 25 | 1893-04-08 | 13.28 | @ Burton Swifts | 5 | 1652 | 55.13% | Grimsby Town | 1 | 1725 | 24.61% | 20.25% |