Home / Leagues / Norway / Tippeligaen / 2000
‹ ›

2000 Tippeligaen Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

54 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Bryne

10.46 points above expected

27 points · 16.54 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Haugesund

9.88 points below expected

19 points · 28.88 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Rosenborg 26 16 6 4 54 61 26 +35 53.35 +0.65
2 Brann 26 14 5 7 47 53 40 +13 41.03 +5.97
3 Viking 26 13 6 7 45 51 39 +12 41.48 +3.52
4 Tromso 26 13 5 8 44 51 46 +5 38.41 +5.59
5 Stabaek 26 12 6 8 42 59 33 +26 43.67 -1.67
6 Lillestrom 26 11 7 8 40 42 29 +13 41.78 -1.78
7 Molde 26 11 7 8 40 46 47 -1 41.67 -1.67
8 Odd Grenland 26 11 5 10 38 40 31 +9 29.39 +8.61
9 Moss 26 8 8 10 32 38 44 -6 33.44 -1.44
10 Bodo Glimt 26 6 10 10 28 48 59 -11 36.36 -8.36
11 Bryne 26 7 6 13 27 32 60 -28 16.54 +10.46
12 Valerenga 26 5 9 12 24 32 44 -12 33.71 -9.71
13 Start 26 5 6 15 21 40 66 -26 24.64 -3.64
14 Haugesund 26 5 4 17 19 33 62 -29 28.88 -9.88

Form

Each team's 5-game rolling points-per-game across the season. Hot streaks push above the dashed 1.5 PPG reference line; cold spells drop below. Each team gets a distinct color; the legend below the plot lets you read off which line is which. (First 4 games of each team have no rolling window, so the lines start at game 5.)

League Race

Cumulative points across the season for each team. Highlighted teams are drawn in color (top finishers for the Title Race, bottom finishers for the Relegation Race); the rest of the league appears in light gray as context. Switch views with the buttons below.

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Rosenborg 1888 54 53.35 +0.65 56.8% 29 43 49 53 58 63 74
Stabaek 1801 42 43.67 -1.67 42.8% 18 33 39 44 48 54 67
Lillestrom 1770 40 41.78 -1.78 42.3% 18 31 37 42 46 53 68
Viking 1765 45 41.48 +3.52 73.1% 19 31 37 41 46 52 65
Brann 1763 47 41.03 +5.97 84.1% 19 30 37 41 45 51 65
Molde 1745 40 41.67 -1.67 42.3% 14 31 37 42 46 52 65
Tromso 1739 44 38.41 +5.59 82.6% 17 28 34 38 43 49 66
Bodo Glimt 1694 28 36.36 -8.36 11.0% 13 26 32 36 41 47 60
Moss 1671 32 33.44 -1.44 44.4% 11 23 29 33 38 44 60
Odd Grenland 1664 38 29.39 +8.61 92.7% 8 19 25 29 34 40 54
Valerenga 1655 24 33.71 -9.71 7.2% 12 23 29 34 38 44 57
Haugesund 1598 19 28.88 -9.88 5.9% 7 19 25 29 33 39 52
Start 1566 21 24.64 -3.64 31.1% 5 15 20 25 29 35 49
Bryne 1493 27 16.54 +10.46 97.2% 1 8 13 16 20 26 41

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team BG BRA BRY HAU LIL MOL MOS OG ROS STA STA TRO VAL VIK
Bodo Glimt —
2-0-0
2.41
1-1-0
4.35
0-2-0
3.25
1-1-0
2.21
0-1-1
2.49
2-0-0
2.90
0-1-1
3.30
0-0-2
1.61
0-1-1
2.38
0-1-1
3.75
0-0-2
2.58
0-2-0
2.85
0-0-2
2.41
Brann
0-0-2
3.09
 —
1-1-0
4.56
2-0-0
3.73
1-0-1
2.67
2-0-0
2.78
1-0-1
3.36
0-1-1
3.76
0-2-0
1.84
0-1-1
2.48
2-0-0
3.89
1-0-1
2.96
2-0-0
3.27
2-0-0
2.61
Bryne
0-1-1
1.28
0-1-1
1.11
 —
1-0-1
1.69
1-1-0
1.07
0-1-1
1.05
1-0-1
1.45
1-0-1
1.60
0-1-1
0.66
1-0-1
0.99
1-0-1
1.91
0-0-2
1.21
1-1-0
1.35
0-0-2
1.10
Haugesund
0-2-0
2.25
0-0-2
1.81
1-0-1
3.87
 —
1-0-1
1.62
0-0-2
1.90
0-1-1
2.43
1-0-1
2.69
0-0-2
1.20
0-0-2
1.72
1-0-1
3.11
0-0-2
2.01
1-0-1
2.34
0-1-1
1.89
Lillestrom
0-1-1
3.29
1-0-1
2.83
0-1-1
4.62
1-0-1
3.94
 —
1-1-0
2.70
1-1-0
3.36
1-0-1
3.67
0-0-2
1.87
1-1-0
2.46
2-0-0
4.01
1-1-0
2.94
2-0-0
3.36
0-1-1
2.81
Molde
1-1-0
3.00
0-0-2
2.70
1-1-0
4.64
2-0-0
3.63
0-1-1
2.78
 —
1-0-1
3.50
1-0-1
3.70
1-0-1
1.90
0-0-2
2.55
0-2-0
4.07
1-1-0
2.98
2-0-0
3.43
1-1-0
2.77
Moss
0-0-2
2.60
1-0-1
2.15
1-0-1
4.15
1-1-0
3.07
0-1-1
2.15
1-0-1
2.02
 —
0-2-0
3.22
0-1-1
1.38
0-1-1
2.04
1-1-0
3.43
1-0-1
2.38
1-1-0
2.63
1-0-1
2.13
Odd Grenland
1-1-0
2.20
1-1-0
1.79
1-0-1
3.97
1-0-1
2.78
1-0-1
1.87
1-0-1
1.85
0-2-0
2.29
 —
0-0-2
1.21
2-0-0
1.67
1-0-1
3.21
1-0-1
2.09
1-1-0
2.53
0-0-2
1.92
Rosenborg
2-0-0
3.96
0-2-0
3.69
1-1-0
5.14
2-0-0
4.45
2-0-0
3.66
1-0-1
3.63
1-1-0
4.23
2-0-0
4.44
 —
2-0-0
3.46
1-0-1
4.77
0-1-1
3.99
1-1-0
4.25
1-0-1
3.69
Stabaek
1-1-0
3.11
1-1-0
3.00
1-0-1
4.71
2-0-0
3.85
0-1-1
3.03
2-0-0
2.94
1-1-0
3.48
0-0-2
3.89
0-0-2
2.06
 —
2-0-0
4.08
0-0-2
3.07
1-1-0
3.41
1-1-0
2.96
Start
1-1-0
1.79
0-0-2
1.67
1-0-1
3.62
1-0-1
2.38
0-0-2
1.56
0-2-0
1.51
0-1-1
2.09
1-0-1
2.28
1-0-1
0.95
0-0-2
1.51
 —
0-1-1
1.73
0-0-2
2.04
0-1-1
1.53
Tromso
2-0-0
2.91
1-0-1
2.54
2-0-0
4.45
2-0-0
3.52
0-1-1
2.55
0-1-1
2.52
1-0-1
3.11
1-0-1
3.42
1-1-0
1.58
2-0-0
2.43
1-1-0
3.83
 —
0-1-1
3.09
0-0-2
2.47
Valerenga
0-2-0
2.64
0-0-2
2.23
0-1-1
4.27
1-0-1
3.17
0-0-2
2.16
0-0-2
2.08
0-1-1
2.86
0-1-1
2.97
0-1-1
1.36
0-1-1
2.11
2-0-0
3.47
1-1-0
2.40
 —
1-1-0
2.02
Viking
2-0-0
3.08
0-0-2
2.88
2-0-0
4.58
1-1-0
3.63
1-1-0
2.68
0-1-1
2.73
1-0-1
3.39
2-0-0
3.61
1-0-1
1.85
0-1-1
2.54
1-1-0
4.06
2-0-0
3.02
0-1-1
3.50
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.69 +9.3
Allowed 0.64 -6.6
Differential 0.85 +5.0

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.95%4.67%6.32%4.12%1.92%0.82%22.80%
14.67%9.34%6.59%1.92%2.75%2.20%27.47%
26.32%6.59%6.59%2.20%2.47%1.10%25.27%
34.12%1.92%2.20%2.75%0.55%—11.54%
41.92%2.75%2.47%0.55%1.10%—8.79%
5+0.82%2.20%1.10%———4.12%
Total22.80%27.47%25.27%11.54%8.79%4.12%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.72 1.72 +0.00
SD 1.50 1.50 2.26
CV 0.87 0.87 —
Max 9 9 +9
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%—3.85%3.85%——11.54%
1—7.69%11.54%—7.69%7.69%34.62%
23.85%3.85%19.23%———26.92%
33.85%—3.85%7.69%3.85%—19.23%
4—3.85%————3.85%
5+—3.85%————3.85%
Total11.54%19.23%38.46%11.54%11.54%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.85 2.27 -0.42
SD 1.35 1.69 2.37
CV 0.73 0.74 —
Max 6 7 +5
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%—11.54%———19.23%
13.85%3.85%——3.85%3.85%15.38%
211.54%11.54%3.85%7.69%——34.62%
33.85%7.69%————11.54%
43.85%3.85%3.85%—3.85%—15.38%
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total30.77%26.92%23.08%7.69%7.69%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.04 1.54 +0.50
SD 1.54 1.65 2.28
CV 0.75 1.08 —
Max 6 7 +4
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%—3.85%15.38%—7.69%30.77%
111.54%11.54%3.85%7.69%——34.62%
23.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%7.69%—23.08%
3———3.85%——3.85%
4——7.69%———7.69%
5+———————
Total19.23%15.38%19.23%30.77%7.69%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.23 2.31 -1.08
SD 1.18 1.95 2.45
CV 0.96 0.85 —
Max 4 9 +2
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%15.38%—3.85%—23.08%
17.69%3.85%11.54%3.85%11.54%—38.46%
2—3.85%11.54%—11.54%3.85%30.77%
3—3.85%————3.85%
4——3.85%———3.85%
5+———————
Total7.69%15.38%42.31%3.85%26.92%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.27 2.38 -1.12
SD 1.00 1.36 1.63
CV 0.79 0.57 —
Max 4 5 +2
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%7.69%3.85%3.85%——23.08%
17.69%15.38%11.54%———34.62%
215.38%3.85%——3.85%—23.08%
3———3.85%——3.85%
43.85%3.85%—3.85%——11.54%
5+3.85%—————3.85%
Total38.46%30.77%15.38%11.54%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.62 1.12 +0.50
SD 1.53 1.18 1.96
CV 0.94 1.06 —
Max 6 4 +6
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%3.85%3.85%7.69%3.85%—23.08%
115.38%7.69%—3.85%—3.85%30.77%
2—7.69%7.69%—3.85%—19.23%
3—3.85%3.85%7.69%——15.38%
4——3.85%———3.85%
5+—7.69%————7.69%
Total19.23%30.77%19.23%19.23%7.69%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.77 1.81 -0.04
SD 1.70 1.50 2.36
CV 0.96 0.83 —
Max 7 6 +6
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%7.69%11.54%3.85%——30.77%
1—11.54%——3.85%11.54%26.92%
23.85%7.69%11.54%———23.08%
33.85%—3.85%———7.69%
47.69%—————7.69%
5+3.85%—————3.85%
Total26.92%26.92%26.92%3.85%3.85%11.54%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.46 1.69 -0.23
SD 1.42 1.69 2.53
CV 0.97 1.00 —
Max 5 6 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.54%11.54%11.54%3.85%——38.46%
1——3.85%———3.85%
27.69%11.54%7.69%7.69%——34.62%
311.54%—————11.54%
43.85%—7.69%———11.54%
5+———————
Total34.62%23.08%30.77%11.54%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.54 1.19 +0.35
SD 1.42 1.06 1.85
CV 0.92 0.89 —
Max 4 3 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%3.85%———7.69%
17.69%11.54%7.69%———26.92%
211.54%11.54%3.85%———26.92%
311.54%7.69%—3.85%——23.08%
4—3.85%——3.85%—7.69%
5+3.85%3.85%————7.69%
Total34.62%42.31%15.38%3.85%3.85%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.35 1.00 +1.35
SD 1.83 1.02 2.17
CV 0.78 1.02 —
Max 9 4 +9
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.69%—11.54%3.85%——23.08%
13.85%7.69%11.54%———23.08%
211.54%—3.85%3.85%——19.23%
3———3.85%——3.85%
47.69%3.85%3.85%———15.38%
5+—11.54%3.85%———15.38%
Total30.77%23.08%34.62%11.54%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.27 1.27 +1.00
SD 2.11 1.04 2.47
CV 0.93 0.82 —
Max 7 3 +6
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%3.85%11.54%7.69%—26.92%
13.85%7.69%7.69%3.85%——23.08%
2—7.69%7.69%7.69%3.85%3.85%30.77%
3———3.85%3.85%—7.69%
4——3.85%3.85%3.85%—11.54%
5+———————
Total3.85%19.23%23.08%30.77%19.23%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.54 2.54 -1.00
SD 1.30 1.24 1.65
CV 0.85 0.49 —
Max 4 5 +2
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—3.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%3.85%19.23%
1—15.38%3.85%—3.85%—23.08%
211.54%3.85%———3.85%19.23%
37.69%—11.54%3.85%——23.08%
4—11.54%————11.54%
5+——3.85%———3.85%
Total19.23%34.62%23.08%7.69%7.69%7.69%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.96 1.77 +0.19
SD 1.46 1.58 2.48
CV 0.74 0.89 —
Max 5 6 +3
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.54%11.54%——7.69%—30.77%
1—11.54%15.38%3.85%—3.85%34.62%
23.85%—11.54%—3.85%—19.23%
33.85%3.85%3.85%———11.54%
4—3.85%————3.85%
5+———————
Total19.23%30.77%30.77%3.85%11.54%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.23 1.69 -0.46
SD 1.14 1.38 1.84
CV 0.93 0.81 —
Max 4 5 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.85%7.69%————11.54%
13.85%15.38%3.85%3.85%7.69%—34.62%
23.85%15.38%———3.85%23.08%
311.54%—3.85%———15.38%
4—3.85%——3.85%—7.69%
5+—3.85%3.85%———7.69%
Total23.08%46.15%11.54%3.85%11.54%3.85%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.96 1.50 +0.46
SD 1.43 1.53 2.06
CV 0.73 1.02 —
Max 5 6 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 26

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Bryne 27 16.54 +10.46
2 Odd Grenland 38 29.39 +8.61
3 Brann 47 41.03 +5.97
4 Tromso 44 38.41 +5.59
5 Viking 45 41.48 +3.52

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Haugesund 19 28.88 -9.88
2 Valerenga 24 33.71 -9.71
3 Bodo Glimt 28 36.36 -8.36
4 Start 21 24.64 -3.64
5 Lillestrom 40 41.78 -1.78

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts W or D consecutively; Winless counts L or D consecutively.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Start 3 Aug 27 – Sep 17 1 in 142
2 Tromso 4 Jul 23 – Aug 6 1 in 32
3 Odd Grenland 3 Sep 17 – Oct 15 1 in 31
4 Brann 4 Sep 20 – Oct 22 1 in 22
5 Bryne 2 Aug 2 – Aug 6 1 in 19

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Molde 4 Jul 2 – Jul 17 1 in 71
2 Rosenborg 2 Aug 27 – Sep 9 1 in 56
3 Bodo Glimt 4 Aug 27 – Oct 1 1 in 40
4 Brann 3 Jul 30 – Aug 13 1 in 36
5 Haugesund 4 May 7 – May 16 1 in 25

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Bryne 4 Aug 20 – Sep 17 1 in 186
2 Start 5 Aug 13 – Sep 17 1 in 122
3 Tromso 10 May 16 – Aug 6 1 in 70
4 Bodo Glimt 8 Jul 16 – Aug 20 1 in 55
5 Odd Grenland 6 Jul 2 – Jul 30 1 in 37

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Bodo Glimt 10 May 13 – Jul 30 1 in 243
2 Valerenga 9 Aug 2 – Oct 15 1 in 36
3 Start 11 Apr 9 – Jul 2 1 in 28
4 Haugesund 10 Jul 2 – Aug 20 1 in 23
5 Rosenborg 2 Aug 27 – Sep 9 1 in 12

Finish Position Heatmap

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team1234567891011121314
Rosenborg68.08%17.00%7.48%3.44%2.01%0.88%0.60%0.37%0.11%0.01%0.01%0.01%——
Brann4.24%11.19%13.51%13.76%12.91%11.66%9.95%8.22%5.62%4.40%2.82%1.28%0.40%0.04%
Viking4.50%13.31%13.91%13.83%12.27%11.28%9.83%7.70%5.80%3.69%2.26%1.29%0.30%0.03%
Tromso1.98%6.57%8.08%9.96%11.21%11.98%11.82%11.54%10.12%7.33%5.31%2.61%1.34%0.15%
Stabaek9.53%19.55%17.57%13.57%11.60%8.96%7.10%4.95%3.26%2.12%1.14%0.48%0.15%0.02%
Lillestrom5.16%13.39%14.17%14.17%12.36%11.42%9.55%7.45%5.16%3.45%2.11%1.21%0.38%0.02%
Molde4.67%11.99%13.68%13.92%13.06%11.83%9.42%7.49%6.06%3.70%2.45%1.16%0.52%0.05%
Odd Grenland0.04%0.33%0.74%1.25%2.33%3.75%5.15%7.75%10.95%14.36%17.77%18.52%13.56%3.50%
Moss0.37%1.46%2.41%3.89%5.66%7.09%9.46%11.61%13.54%14.51%13.26%10.31%5.27%1.16%
Bodo Glimt1.02%3.33%4.99%6.94%8.86%10.61%11.95%12.42%12.39%11.02%8.06%5.45%2.58%0.38%
Bryne————0.01%0.08%0.03%0.10%0.24%0.80%1.71%5.00%16.27%75.76%
Valerenga0.38%1.55%2.73%4.05%5.65%7.02%9.67%11.62%13.27%14.12%13.66%10.34%5.16%0.78%
Start—0.06%0.12%0.17%0.43%0.66%1.34%2.84%4.24%7.41%11.83%21.05%36.47%13.38%
Haugesund0.03%0.27%0.61%1.05%1.64%2.78%4.13%5.94%9.24%13.08%17.61%21.29%17.60%4.73%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Points Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 5% * Slight Edge: 5% to 15% * Clear Edge: 15% to 25% * Strong Edge: 25% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+14.84%
Slight Edge
45.05%24.73%30.22%
Elo Value
Home Edge
168 Elo
0.006 goals per Elo point
051.93500
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.52 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.31+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.15 * Tight Race: 0.15 to 0.4 * Comfortable: 0.4 to 0.75 * Runaway: 0.75 and up.
Title-Race Openness
2.1
Top-Heavy
124610
Champion Preseason Odds
68%
Rosenborg, 1st of 14
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.27/gm
Tight Race
00.230.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 5.02 * Some Luck: 5.02 to 7.52 * Lucky: 7.52 to 10.03 * Wild Swing: 10.03 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.55 * Close: 1.55 to 2.33 * Off: 2.33 to 3.11 * Way Off: 3.11 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
6.26 points
Some Luck
06.2716
Average Finish Error
Expected
2.29
Close
01.944
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 96.43%
97.21%
Bryne
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 3.57%
5.92%
Haugesund
050
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 14
Minimal Outliers
01.47

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.12 * Even: 0.12 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.26 * Lopsided: 0.26 and up.
Noll-Scully
How much more spread out the table was than a league where every match is a coin flip. The gold line at 1 is that coin-flip baseline. Above it, real talent gaps stretched the table; below it, the league was tighter than luck alone would produce.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1 * Moderate Separation: 1 to 1.6 * Strong Separation: 1.6 to 2.2 * Wide Separation: 2.2 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 60% * Slight Edge: 60% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 80% * Wide Edge: 80% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 82% * Strong Edge: 82% to 92% * Dominant: 92% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 30% * Some Drama: 30% to 40% * Frequent: 40% to 50% * Very Frequent: 50% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 8% * Occasional: 8% to 14% * Frequent: 14% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.16
Even
00.120.180.260.5
Noll-Scully
Coin-flip
1.40
Moderate Separation
01.003
Interquartile Edge
65%
Slight Edge
50%60%70%80%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
91%
Strong Edge
50%89%100%
Close Games
Expected
53%
Very Frequent
0%49%100%
Blowouts
Expected
26%
Very Frequent
0%27%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.1 * Slight Separation: 0.1 to 0.18 * Notable Separation: 0.18 to 0.28 * Lopsided: 0.28 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.3 * Some Carryover: 0.3 to 0.6 * Strong Carryover: 0.6 to 0.85 * Near-Lock: 0.85 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 25% * As Expected: 25% to 33% * Upset-Prone: 33% to 42% * Very Upset-Prone: 42% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 15% * As Expected: 15% to 25% * Shaky Favorites: 25% to 35% * Very Shaky: 35% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.62
Predictable
00.592
Matchup Imbalance
0.36
Lopsided
00.10.180.280.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.06
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.76
Strong Carryover
00.30.60.851
Upset Rate
Expected
25%
As Expected
0%24%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
22%
As Expected
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.13 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.13 to 0.19 * Above Noise: 0.19 to 0.26 * Well Above Noise: 0.26 and up.
Probability calibration
0.62
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.82
Overconfident
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.073
Well Within Noise
00.1300.3

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Qualified for relegation playoff Direct relegation
Rosenborg 99.99% 0.01% —
Stabaek 99.35% 0.48% 0.17%
Viking 98.38% 1.29% 0.33%
Lillestrom 98.39% 1.21% 0.40%
Brann 98.28% 1.28% 0.44%
Molde 98.27% 1.16% 0.57%
Tromso 95.90% 2.61% 1.49%
Bodo Glimt 91.59% 5.45% 2.96%
Valerenga 83.72% 10.34% 5.94%
Moss 83.26% 10.31% 6.43%
Odd Grenland 64.42% 18.52% 17.06%
Haugesund 56.38% 21.29% 22.33%
Start 29.10% 21.05% 49.85%
Bryne 2.97% 5.00% 92.03%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent Score Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss % Elo Δ Points
2000-04-08 Rosenborg L 0-2 1762 1854 31.4% 25.9% 42.6% -7.2 0
2000-04-08 @ Stabaek W 2-0 1854 1762 42.6% 25.9% 31.4% +7.2 3
2000-04-09 Viking W 4-1 1740 1750 42.9% 25.9% 31.2% +8.7 3
2000-04-09 @ Brann L 1-4 1750 1740 31.2% 25.9% 42.9% -8.7 0
2000-04-09 Start W 4-2 1480 1611 26.9% 25.1% 48.0% +7.7 3
2000-04-09 @ Bryne L 2-4 1611 1480 48.0% 25.1% 26.9% -7.7 0
2000-04-09 Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1664 1720 36.2% 26.2% 37.6% +0.0 1
2000-04-09 @ Haugesund D 2-2 1720 1664 37.6% 26.2% 36.2% -0.0 1
2000-04-09 Molde D 1-1 1749 1770 41.3% 26.1% 32.6% -0.2 1
2000-04-09 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1770 1749 32.6% 26.1% 41.3% +0.2 1
2000-04-09 Odd Grenland D 0-0 1679 1607 53.9% 23.5% 22.5% -0.8 1
2000-04-09 @ Moss D 0-0 1607 1679 22.5% 23.5% 53.9% +0.9 1
2000-04-09 Tromso W 4-1 1689 1738 37.4% 26.2% 36.4% +9.8 3
2000-04-09 @ Valerenga L 1-4 1738 1689 36.4% 26.2% 37.4% -9.8 0
2000-04-15 Lillestrom D 1-1 1741 1749 43.2% 25.9% 31.0% -0.3 1
2000-04-15 @ Viking D 1-1 1749 1741 31.0% 25.9% 43.2% +0.3 2
2000-04-16 Valerenga D 0-0 1720 1699 47.2% 25.2% 27.5% -0.5 2
2000-04-16 @ Bodo Glimt D 0-0 1699 1720 27.5% 25.2% 47.2% +0.5 4
2000-04-16 Haugesund W 2-1 1770 1664 58.3% 22.0% 19.7% +2.3 4
2000-04-16 @ Molde L 1-2 1664 1770 19.7% 22.0% 58.3% -2.3 1
2000-04-16 Stabaek W 2-0 1608 1754 25.3% 24.6% 50.1% +10.2 4
2000-04-16 @ Odd Grenland L 0-2 1754 1608 50.1% 24.6% 25.3% -10.2 0
2000-04-16 Brann D 4-4 1861 1748 59.1% 21.7% 19.2% -0.5 4
2000-04-16 @ Rosenborg D 4-4 1748 1861 19.2% 21.7% 59.1% +0.5 4
2000-04-16 Moss D 1-1 1604 1678 33.8% 26.1% 40.1% +0.1 1
2000-04-16 @ Start D 1-1 1678 1604 40.1% 26.1% 33.8% -0.1 2
2000-04-16 Bryne W 3-0 1728 1488 73.3% 14.9% 11.8% +3.7 3
2000-04-16 @ Tromso L 0-3 1488 1728 11.8% 14.9% 73.3% -3.7 3
2000-04-19 Odd Grenland D 0-0 1749 1618 61.3% 20.8% 17.9% -1.2 5
2000-04-19 @ Brann D 0-0 1618 1749 17.9% 20.8% 61.3% +1.2 5
2000-04-19 Bodo Glimt L 1-2 1484 1720 17.9% 20.7% 61.4% -2.1 3
2000-04-19 @ Bryne W 2-1 1720 1484 61.4% 20.7% 17.9% +2.1 5
2000-04-19 Valerenga W 4-2 1661 1700 38.9% 26.2% 34.9% +6.0 4
2000-04-19 @ Haugesund L 2-4 1700 1661 34.9% 26.2% 38.9% -6.0 4
2000-04-19 Rosenborg L 0-2 1749 1860 29.1% 25.6% 45.3% -6.7 2
2000-04-19 @ Lillestrom W 2-0 1860 1749 45.3% 25.6% 29.1% +6.7 7
2000-04-19 Viking D 0-0 1772 1741 48.7% 24.9% 26.4% -0.6 5
2000-04-19 @ Molde D 0-0 1741 1772 26.4% 24.9% 48.7% +0.6 2
2000-04-19 Tromso W 4-0 1678 1731 36.6% 26.2% 37.1% +15.4 5
2000-04-19 @ Moss L 0-4 1731 1678 37.1% 26.2% 36.6% -15.4 3
2000-04-19 Start W 1-0 1744 1604 62.5% 20.2% 17.3% +2.1 3
2000-04-19 @ Stabaek L 0-1 1604 1744 17.3% 20.2% 62.5% -2.1 1
2000-04-29 Molde L 0-1 1867 1772 57.0% 22.5% 20.5% -6.0 7
2000-04-29 @ Rosenborg W 1-0 1772 1867 20.5% 22.5% 57.0% +6.0 8
2000-04-29 Brann L 0-2 1602 1748 25.3% 24.6% 50.0% -6.0 1
2000-04-29 @ Start W 2-0 1748 1602 50.0% 24.6% 25.3% +6.0 8
2000-04-30 Moss W 4-1 1722 1693 48.2% 25.0% 26.7% +7.6 8
2000-04-30 @ Bodo Glimt L 1-4 1693 1722 26.7% 25.0% 48.2% -7.7 5
2000-04-30 Lillestrom W 2-1 1619 1742 27.8% 25.3% 46.9% +4.9 8
2000-04-30 @ Odd Grenland L 1-2 1742 1619 46.9% 25.3% 27.8% -4.9 2
2000-04-30 Stabaek W 2-1 1716 1746 40.0% 26.1% 33.9% +3.8 6
2000-04-30 @ Tromso L 1-2 1746 1716 33.9% 26.1% 40.0% -3.8 3
2000-04-30 Bryne D 2-2 1694 1482 70.4% 16.4% 13.2% -1.0 5
2000-04-30 @ Valerenga D 2-2 1482 1694 13.2% 16.4% 70.4% +1.1 4
2000-04-30 Haugesund W 4-1 1741 1667 54.2% 23.4% 22.4% +6.5 5
2000-04-30 @ Viking L 1-4 1667 1741 22.4% 23.4% 54.2% -6.5 4
2000-05-03 Bryne W 3-1 1661 1483 66.8% 18.2% 15.0% +3.0 7
2000-05-03 @ Haugesund L 1-3 1483 1661 15.0% 18.2% 66.8% -3.0 4
2000-05-03 Start W 4-0 1737 1596 62.6% 20.2% 17.2% +7.6 5
2000-05-03 @ Lillestrom L 0-4 1596 1737 17.2% 20.2% 62.6% -7.6 1
2000-05-03 Odd Grenland W 3-2 1778 1624 64.0% 19.6% 16.4% +1.8 11
2000-05-03 @ Molde L 2-3 1624 1778 16.4% 19.6% 64.0% -1.8 8
2000-05-03 Valerenga W 2-1 1686 1692 43.3% 25.9% 30.9% +3.5 8
2000-05-03 @ Moss L 1-2 1692 1686 30.9% 25.9% 43.3% -3.5 5
2000-05-03 Bodo Glimt W 6-1 1743 1730 46.1% 25.4% 28.5% +12.8 6
2000-05-03 @ Stabaek L 1-6 1730 1743 28.5% 25.4% 46.1% -12.8 8
2000-05-03 Rosenborg L 0-1 1748 1861 28.9% 25.5% 45.6% -3.5 5
2000-05-03 @ Viking W 1-0 1861 1748 45.6% 25.5% 28.9% +3.5 10
2000-05-04 Tromso W 2-0 1754 1720 48.9% 24.9% 26.2% +6.1 11
2000-05-04 @ Brann L 0-2 1720 1754 26.2% 24.9% 48.9% -6.1 6
2000-05-06 Viking L 2-3 1622 1744 27.9% 25.3% 46.8% -3.1 8
2000-05-06 @ Odd Grenland W 3-2 1744 1622 46.8% 25.3% 27.9% +3.1 8
2000-05-07 Brann W 3-2 1717 1760 38.2% 26.2% 35.6% +3.7 11
2000-05-07 @ Bodo Glimt L 2-3 1760 1717 35.6% 26.2% 38.2% -3.7 11
2000-05-07 Moss W 2-0 1480 1689 19.8% 22.0% 58.2% +11.5 7
2000-05-07 @ Bryne L 0-2 1689 1480 58.2% 22.0% 19.8% -11.5 8
2000-05-07 Haugesund W 4-1 1865 1664 69.3% 17.0% 13.7% +3.8 13
2000-05-07 @ Rosenborg L 1-4 1664 1865 13.7% 17.0% 69.3% -3.8 7
2000-05-07 Molde D 2-2 1588 1780 21.2% 22.8% 56.0% +0.6 2
2000-05-07 @ Start D 2-2 1780 1588 56.0% 22.8% 21.2% -0.6 12
2000-05-07 Lillestrom D 1-1 1714 1745 39.8% 26.2% 34.0% -0.1 7
2000-05-07 @ Tromso D 1-1 1745 1714 34.0% 26.2% 39.8% +0.1 6
2000-05-07 Stabaek D 0-0 1689 1755 34.8% 26.2% 39.0% +0.1 6
2000-05-07 @ Valerenga D 0-0 1755 1689 39.0% 26.2% 34.8% -0.1 7
2000-05-10 Valerenga W 3-1 1756 1689 53.3% 23.7% 23.0% +4.7 14
2000-05-10 @ Brann L 1-3 1689 1756 23.0% 23.7% 53.3% -4.7 6
2000-05-10 Moss L 0-2 1660 1678 41.8% 26.0% 32.2% -8.9 7
2000-05-10 @ Haugesund W 2-0 1678 1660 32.2% 26.0% 41.8% +8.9 11
2000-05-10 Tromso D 3-3 1779 1714 53.1% 23.8% 23.1% -0.5 13
2000-05-10 @ Molde D 3-3 1714 1779 23.1% 23.8% 53.1% +0.4 8
2000-05-10 Odd Grenland W 2-0 1868 1619 74.3% 14.4% 11.3% +2.4 16
2000-05-10 @ Rosenborg L 0-2 1619 1868 11.3% 14.4% 74.3% -2.4 8
2000-05-10 Bryne W 2-0 1755 1492 75.6% 13.7% 10.7% +2.3 10
2000-05-10 @ Stabaek L 0-2 1492 1755 10.7% 13.7% 75.6% -2.3 7
2000-05-10 Start W 3-0 1747 1589 64.6% 19.3% 16.1% +5.4 11
2000-05-10 @ Viking L 0-3 1589 1747 16.1% 19.3% 64.6% -5.4 2
2000-05-13 Molde D 2-2 1721 1779 36.0% 26.2% 37.8% +0.0 12
2000-05-13 @ Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1779 1721 37.8% 26.2% 36.0% -0.0 14
2000-05-13 Brann L 0-3 1490 1761 15.6% 18.8% 65.6% -5.2 7
2000-05-13 @ Bryne W 3-0 1761 1490 65.6% 18.8% 15.6% +5.2 17
2000-05-13 Stabaek D 1-1 1686 1757 34.2% 26.2% 39.6% +0.1 12
2000-05-13 @ Moss D 1-1 1757 1686 39.6% 26.2% 34.2% -0.1 11
2000-05-13 Haugesund W 4-2 1617 1651 39.4% 26.2% 34.4% +6.0 11
2000-05-13 @ Odd Grenland L 2-4 1651 1617 34.4% 26.2% 39.4% -6.0 7
2000-05-13 Rosenborg L 1-3 1583 1871 14.6% 17.9% 67.4% -2.9 2
2000-05-13 @ Start W 3-1 1871 1583 67.4% 17.9% 14.6% +2.9 19
2000-05-13 Viking L 2-5 1714 1753 38.8% 26.2% 35.0% -8.9 8
2000-05-13 @ Tromso W 5-2 1753 1714 35.0% 26.2% 38.8% +8.9 14
2000-05-13 Lillestrom L 0-1 1684 1745 35.6% 26.2% 38.1% -4.2 6
2000-05-13 @ Valerenga W 1-0 1745 1684 38.1% 26.2% 35.6% +4.2 9
2000-05-16 Moss W 2-0 1766 1687 54.9% 23.2% 21.9% +5.2 20
2000-05-16 @ Brann L 0-2 1687 1766 21.9% 23.2% 54.9% -5.2 12
2000-05-16 Stabaek L 0-4 1645 1757 29.0% 25.6% 45.4% -12.7 7
2000-05-16 @ Haugesund W 4-0 1757 1645 45.4% 25.6% 29.0% +12.7 14
2000-05-16 Bryne D 1-1 1749 1484 75.8% 13.6% 10.6% -1.6 10
2000-05-16 @ Lillestrom D 1-1 1484 1749 10.6% 13.6% 75.8% +1.6 8
2000-05-16 Valerenga W 2-1 1778 1680 57.4% 22.3% 20.3% +2.4 17
2000-05-16 @ Molde L 1-2 1680 1778 20.3% 22.3% 57.4% -2.4 6
2000-05-16 Start W 3-0 1623 1581 50.1% 24.6% 25.3% +8.6 14
2000-05-16 @ Odd Grenland L 0-3 1581 1623 25.3% 24.6% 50.1% -8.6 2
2000-05-16 Tromso D 1-1 1874 1705 65.8% 18.7% 15.5% -1.2 20
2000-05-16 @ Rosenborg D 1-1 1705 1874 15.5% 18.7% 65.8% +1.2 9
2000-05-16 Bodo Glimt W 2-0 1762 1721 49.9% 24.6% 25.5% +6.0 17
2000-05-16 @ Viking L 0-2 1721 1762 25.5% 24.6% 49.9% -6.0 12
2000-05-21 Molde L 1-3 1486 1781 14.2% 17.5% 68.2% -2.8 8
2000-05-21 @ Bryne W 3-1 1781 1486 68.2% 17.5% 14.2% +2.8 20
2000-05-21 Lillestrom D 0-0 1681 1748 34.9% 26.2% 39.0% +0.1 13
2000-05-21 @ Moss D 0-0 1748 1681 39.0% 26.2% 34.9% -0.1 11
2000-05-21 Brann W 7-1 1770 1771 44.1% 25.7% 30.1% +15.9 17
2000-05-21 @ Stabaek L 1-7 1771 1770 30.1% 25.7% 44.1% -15.8 20
2000-05-21 Haugesund L 1-2 1572 1633 35.6% 26.2% 38.1% -4.0 2
2000-05-21 @ Start W 2-1 1633 1572 38.1% 26.2% 35.6% +4.0 10
2000-05-21 Odd Grenland W 2-0 1706 1631 54.4% 23.4% 22.3% +5.3 12
2000-05-21 @ Tromso L 0-2 1631 1706 22.3% 23.4% 54.4% -5.3 14
2000-05-21 Viking W 3-1 1678 1767 31.8% 26.0% 42.3% +7.8 9
2000-05-21 @ Valerenga L 1-3 1767 1678 42.3% 26.0% 31.8% -7.8 17
2000-05-22 Rosenborg L 0-3 1715 1873 24.2% 24.2% 51.6% -8.3 12
2000-05-22 @ Bodo Glimt W 3-0 1873 1715 51.6% 24.2% 24.2% +8.3 23
2000-07-02 Brann L 2-4 1637 1755 28.3% 25.4% 46.3% -5.1 10
2000-07-02 @ Haugesund W 4-2 1755 1637 46.3% 25.4% 28.3% +5.1 23
2000-07-02 Moss L 0-3 1784 1681 57.8% 22.2% 20.0% -16.7 20
2000-07-02 @ Molde W 3-0 1681 1784 20.0% 22.2% 57.8% +16.6 16
2000-07-02 Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1626 1706 33.0% 26.1% 40.9% +0.1 15
2000-07-02 @ Odd Grenland D 2-2 1706 1626 40.9% 26.1% 33.0% -0.1 13
2000-07-02 Valerenga W 2-1 1881 1686 68.7% 17.3% 14.0% +1.6 26
2000-07-02 @ Rosenborg L 1-2 1686 1881 14.0% 17.3% 68.7% -1.6 9
2000-07-02 Tromso D 1-1 1568 1712 25.6% 24.7% 49.7% +0.6 3
2000-07-02 @ Start D 1-1 1712 1568 49.7% 24.7% 25.6% -0.6 13
2000-07-02 Bryne W 3-0 1760 1483 76.8% 13.0% 10.2% +3.1 20
2000-07-02 @ Viking L 0-3 1483 1760 10.2% 13.0% 76.8% -3.1 8
2000-07-05 Start L 3-4 1706 1569 62.2% 20.4% 17.5% -5.6 13
2000-07-05 @ Bodo Glimt W 4-3 1569 1706 17.5% 20.4% 62.2% +5.6 6
2000-07-05 Lillestrom L 0-2 1760 1748 46.1% 25.4% 28.5% -9.6 23
2000-07-05 @ Brann W 2-0 1748 1760 28.5% 25.4% 46.1% +9.6 14
2000-07-05 Rosenborg D 3-3 1480 1882 9.3% 11.9% 78.8% +1.1 9
2000-07-05 @ Bryne D 3-3 1882 1480 78.8% 11.9% 9.3% -1.1 27
2000-07-05 Tromso L 0-2 1631 1711 33.1% 26.1% 40.8% -7.5 10
2000-07-05 @ Haugesund W 2-0 1711 1631 40.8% 26.1% 33.1% +7.5 16
2000-07-05 Viking L 1-5 1698 1763 35.1% 26.2% 38.7% -12.3 16
2000-07-05 @ Moss W 5-1 1763 1698 38.7% 26.2% 35.1% +12.3 23
2000-07-05 Molde W 6-1 1786 1767 46.9% 25.3% 27.8% +12.5 20
2000-07-05 @ Stabaek L 1-6 1767 1786 27.8% 25.3% 46.9% -12.5 20
2000-07-05 Odd Grenland D 0-0 1684 1626 52.1% 24.1% 23.8% -0.8 10
2000-07-05 @ Valerenga D 0-0 1626 1684 23.8% 24.1% 52.1% +0.8 16
2000-07-09 Haugesund W 4-1 1757 1624 61.6% 20.6% 17.8% +5.1 17
2000-07-09 @ Lillestrom L 1-4 1624 1757 17.8% 20.6% 61.6% -5.1 10
2000-07-09 Bryne W 4-2 1627 1481 63.1% 20.0% 16.9% +3.0 19
2000-07-09 @ Odd Grenland L 2-4 1481 1627 16.9% 20.0% 63.1% -3.0 9
2000-07-09 Moss W 5-1 1881 1686 68.7% 17.3% 14.0% +5.0 30
2000-07-09 @ Rosenborg L 1-5 1686 1881 14.0% 17.3% 68.7% -5.0 16
2000-07-09 Valerenga L 2-3 1574 1683 29.4% 25.6% 45.0% -3.2 6
2000-07-09 @ Start W 3-2 1683 1574 45.0% 25.6% 29.4% +3.2 13
2000-07-09 Bodo Glimt W 4-1 1718 1701 46.8% 25.3% 27.9% +8.0 19
2000-07-09 @ Tromso L 1-4 1701 1718 27.9% 25.3% 46.8% -7.9 13
2000-07-12 Rosenborg L 0-1 1754 1886 26.8% 25.0% 48.1% -3.3 20
2000-07-12 @ Molde W 1-0 1886 1754 48.1% 25.0% 26.8% +3.3 33
2000-07-16 Haugesund D 2-2 1693 1619 54.2% 23.4% 22.4% -0.6 14
2000-07-16 @ Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1619 1693 22.4% 23.4% 54.2% +0.6 11
2000-07-16 Moss D 2-2 1630 1681 37.1% 26.2% 36.7% +0.0 20
2000-07-16 @ Odd Grenland D 2-2 1681 1630 36.7% 26.2% 37.1% +0.0 17
2000-07-16 Stabaek W 3-0 1890 1798 56.5% 22.7% 20.9% +7.2 36
2000-07-16 @ Rosenborg L 0-3 1798 1890 20.9% 22.7% 56.5% -7.2 20
2000-07-16 Bryne W 4-2 1571 1478 56.6% 22.6% 20.8% +3.8 9
2000-07-16 @ Start L 2-4 1478 1571 20.8% 22.6% 56.6% -3.8 9
2000-07-16 Valerenga D 1-1 1726 1686 49.8% 24.7% 25.6% -0.6 20
2000-07-16 @ Tromso D 1-1 1686 1726 25.6% 24.7% 49.8% +0.6 14
2000-07-16 Brann L 2-6 1775 1751 47.6% 25.1% 27.2% -13.2 23
2000-07-16 @ Viking W 6-2 1751 1775 27.2% 25.1% 47.6% +13.2 26
2000-07-17 Lillestrom L 0-2 1751 1762 42.7% 25.9% 31.4% -9.0 20
2000-07-17 @ Molde W 2-0 1762 1751 31.4% 25.9% 42.7% +9.0 20
2000-07-23 Rosenborg D 1-1 1764 1897 26.7% 25.0% 48.3% +0.5 27
2000-07-23 @ Brann D 1-1 1897 1764 48.3% 25.0% 26.7% -0.5 37
2000-07-23 Tromso L 2-3 1474 1726 16.8% 19.9% 63.3% -1.8 9
2000-07-23 @ Bryne W 3-2 1726 1474 63.3% 19.9% 16.8% +1.9 23
2000-07-23 Molde L 2-4 1620 1742 27.8% 25.3% 46.9% -5.0 11
2000-07-23 @ Haugesund W 4-2 1742 1620 46.9% 25.3% 27.8% +5.0 23
2000-07-23 Viking L 0-1 1771 1762 45.6% 25.5% 28.9% -5.0 20
2000-07-23 @ Lillestrom W 1-0 1762 1771 28.9% 25.5% 45.6% +5.0 26
2000-07-23 Start W 4-0 1681 1575 58.3% 22.0% 19.7% +8.8 20
2000-07-23 @ Moss L 0-4 1575 1681 19.7% 22.0% 58.3% -8.8 9
2000-07-23 Odd Grenland L 1-2 1791 1630 64.9% 19.1% 16.0% -6.3 20
2000-07-23 @ Stabaek W 2-1 1630 1791 16.0% 19.1% 64.9% +6.3 23
2000-07-23 Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1687 1692 43.6% 25.8% 30.6% -0.3 15
2000-07-23 @ Valerenga D 1-1 1692 1687 30.6% 25.8% 43.6% +0.3 15
2000-07-26 Bodo Glimt D 3-3 1766 1692 54.2% 23.4% 22.4% -0.5 21
2000-07-26 @ Lillestrom D 3-3 1692 1766 22.4% 23.4% 54.2% +0.5 16
2000-07-26 Brann L 1-3 1747 1764 41.8% 26.0% 32.2% -7.7 23
2000-07-26 @ Molde W 3-1 1764 1747 32.2% 26.0% 41.8% +7.7 30
2000-07-26 Haugesund W 2-0 1687 1615 54.0% 23.5% 22.5% +5.3 18
2000-07-26 @ Valerenga L 0-2 1615 1687 22.5% 23.5% 54.0% -5.3 11
2000-07-30 Bryne D 1-1 1693 1472 71.4% 15.9% 12.7% -1.4 17
2000-07-30 @ Bodo Glimt D 1-1 1472 1693 12.7% 15.9% 71.4% +1.5 10
2000-07-30 Brann W 2-0 1636 1772 26.4% 24.9% 48.7% +10.0 26
2000-07-30 @ Odd Grenland L 0-2 1772 1636 48.7% 24.9% 26.4% -10.0 30
2000-07-30 Lillestrom W 2-1 1896 1766 61.3% 20.8% 17.9% +2.1 40
2000-07-30 @ Rosenborg L 1-2 1766 1896 17.9% 20.8% 61.3% -2.1 21
2000-07-30 Stabaek L 2-5 1566 1785 19.0% 21.5% 59.5% -4.8 9
2000-07-30 @ Start W 5-2 1785 1566 59.5% 21.5% 19.0% +4.7 23
2000-07-30 Moss W 3-0 1728 1690 49.5% 24.7% 25.8% +8.8 26
2000-07-30 @ Tromso L 0-3 1690 1728 25.8% 24.7% 49.5% -8.8 20
2000-07-30 Molde L 0-1 1767 1739 48.1% 25.1% 26.9% -5.3 26
2000-07-30 @ Viking W 1-0 1739 1767 26.9% 25.1% 48.1% +5.3 26
2000-08-02 Valerenga W 1-0 1474 1692 19.1% 21.6% 59.3% +6.2 13
2000-08-02 @ Bryne L 0-1 1692 1474 59.3% 21.6% 19.1% -6.2 18
2000-08-02 Viking D 1-1 1609 1762 24.7% 24.4% 50.9% +0.6 12
2000-08-02 @ Haugesund D 1-1 1762 1609 50.9% 24.4% 24.7% -0.6 27
2000-08-02 Odd Grenland W 2-0 1764 1646 59.7% 21.4% 18.9% +4.4 24
2000-08-02 @ Lillestrom L 0-2 1646 1764 18.9% 21.4% 59.7% -4.4 26
2000-08-02 Bodo Glimt L 1-6 1681 1691 42.8% 25.9% 31.3% -17.5 20
2000-08-02 @ Moss W 6-1 1691 1681 31.3% 25.9% 42.8% +17.5 20
2000-08-02 Tromso L 2-3 1790 1736 51.5% 24.2% 24.2% -5.0 23
2000-08-02 @ Stabaek W 3-2 1736 1790 24.2% 24.2% 51.5% +5.0 29
2000-08-06 Stabaek D 3-3 1709 1785 33.6% 26.1% 40.3% +0.1 21
2000-08-06 @ Bodo Glimt D 3-3 1785 1709 40.3% 26.1% 33.6% -0.1 24
2000-08-06 Haugesund W 1-0 1480 1610 27.1% 25.1% 47.9% +5.2 16
2000-08-06 @ Bryne L 0-1 1610 1480 47.9% 25.1% 27.1% -5.2 12
2000-08-06 Molde W 3-0 1642 1745 30.1% 25.7% 44.1% +13.5 29
2000-08-06 @ Odd Grenland L 0-3 1745 1642 44.1% 25.7% 30.1% -13.5 26
2000-08-06 Viking L 1-2 1898 1761 62.1% 20.4% 17.5% -6.1 40
2000-08-06 @ Rosenborg W 2-1 1761 1898 17.5% 20.4% 62.1% +6.1 30
2000-08-06 Brann W 4-1 1741 1762 41.3% 26.0% 32.6% +9.0 32
2000-08-06 @ Tromso L 1-4 1762 1741 32.6% 26.0% 41.3% -9.0 30
2000-08-06 Moss D 2-2 1686 1663 47.4% 25.2% 27.4% -0.3 19
2000-08-06 @ Valerenga D 2-2 1663 1686 27.4% 25.2% 47.4% +0.4 21
2000-08-09 Stabaek L 1-4 1767 1785 41.8% 26.0% 32.2% -10.9 30
2000-08-09 @ Viking W 4-1 1785 1767 32.2% 26.0% 41.8% +10.9 27
2000-08-12 Rosenborg L 1-3 1605 1892 14.6% 17.9% 67.5% -2.9 12
2000-08-12 @ Haugesund W 3-1 1892 1605 67.5% 17.9% 14.6% +2.9 43
2000-08-13 Bodo Glimt L 0-2 1753 1709 50.3% 24.5% 25.1% -10.3 30
2000-08-13 @ Brann W 2-0 1709 1753 25.1% 24.5% 50.3% +10.3 24
2000-08-13 Tromso W 6-0 1768 1750 46.7% 25.3% 28.0% +18.0 27
2000-08-13 @ Lillestrom L 0-6 1750 1768 28.0% 25.3% 46.7% -18.0 32
2000-08-13 Start D 3-3 1731 1561 65.9% 18.7% 15.4% -0.8 27
2000-08-13 @ Molde D 3-3 1561 1731 15.4% 18.7% 65.9% +0.8 10
2000-08-13 Bryne W 5-0 1664 1485 66.8% 18.2% 14.9% +7.9 24
2000-08-13 @ Moss L 0-5 1485 1664 14.9% 18.2% 66.8% -7.9 16
2000-08-13 Valerenga W 4-0 1796 1685 58.8% 21.8% 19.4% +8.7 30
2000-08-13 @ Stabaek L 0-4 1685 1796 19.4% 21.8% 58.8% -8.7 19
2000-08-13 Odd Grenland W 2-1 1756 1655 57.7% 22.2% 20.1% +2.4 33
2000-08-13 @ Viking L 1-2 1655 1756 20.1% 22.2% 57.7% -2.4 29
2000-08-20 Lillestrom W 3-0 1719 1786 34.8% 26.2% 39.0% +12.3 27
2000-08-20 @ Bodo Glimt L 0-3 1786 1719 39.0% 26.2% 34.8% -12.3 27
2000-08-20 Stabaek W 2-1 1477 1804 12.6% 15.8% 71.6% +6.7 19
2000-08-20 @ Bryne L 1-2 1804 1477 71.6% 15.8% 12.6% -6.7 30
2000-08-20 Haugesund D 2-2 1672 1602 53.7% 23.6% 22.7% -0.6 25
2000-08-20 @ Moss D 2-2 1602 1672 22.7% 23.6% 53.7% +0.6 13
2000-08-20 Rosenborg L 0-3 1653 1895 17.4% 20.4% 62.2% -5.9 29
2000-08-20 @ Odd Grenland W 3-0 1895 1653 62.2% 20.4% 17.4% +5.9 46
2000-08-20 Viking D 4-4 1562 1759 20.8% 22.6% 56.7% +0.5 11
2000-08-20 @ Start D 4-4 1759 1562 56.7% 22.6% 20.8% -0.5 34
2000-08-20 Molde L 0-1 1732 1730 44.5% 25.7% 29.8% -5.0 32
2000-08-20 @ Tromso W 1-0 1730 1732 29.8% 25.7% 44.5% +5.0 30
2000-08-20 Brann L 0-1 1677 1743 34.9% 26.2% 38.9% -4.1 19
2000-08-20 @ Valerenga W 1-0 1743 1677 38.9% 26.2% 34.9% +4.1 33
2000-08-27 Bryne D 0-0 1747 1484 75.6% 13.7% 10.7% -1.8 34
2000-08-27 @ Brann D 0-0 1484 1747 10.7% 13.7% 75.6% +1.8 20
2000-08-27 Odd Grenland W 1-0 1602 1647 37.9% 26.2% 35.9% +4.2 16
2000-08-27 @ Haugesund L 0-1 1647 1602 35.9% 26.2% 37.9% -4.2 29
2000-08-27 Valerenga W 2-1 1774 1673 57.7% 22.2% 20.1% +2.4 30
2000-08-27 @ Lillestrom L 1-2 1673 1774 20.1% 22.2% 57.7% -2.4 19
2000-08-27 Bodo Glimt W 7-1 1735 1732 44.8% 25.6% 29.5% +15.6 33
2000-08-27 @ Molde L 1-7 1732 1735 29.5% 25.6% 44.8% -15.6 27
2000-08-27 Start L 1-2 1901 1562 82.1% 10.1% 7.8% -7.3 46
2000-08-27 @ Rosenborg W 2-1 1562 1901 7.8% 10.1% 82.1% +7.3 14
2000-08-27 Moss W 2-0 1798 1671 60.8% 21.0% 18.2% +4.3 33
2000-08-27 @ Stabaek L 0-2 1671 1798 18.2% 21.0% 60.8% -4.3 25
2000-08-27 Tromso W 2-1 1758 1727 48.5% 25.0% 26.5% +3.1 37
2000-08-27 @ Viking L 1-2 1727 1758 26.5% 25.0% 48.5% -3.1 32
2000-09-09 Brann W 3-2 1667 1745 33.2% 26.1% 40.7% +4.1 28
2000-09-09 @ Moss L 2-3 1745 1667 40.7% 26.1% 33.2% -4.1 34
2000-09-09 Rosenborg W 2-0 1724 1894 23.1% 23.8% 53.2% +10.7 35
2000-09-09 @ Tromso L 0-2 1894 1724 53.2% 23.8% 23.1% -10.7 46
2000-09-10 Viking L 1-2 1716 1761 37.8% 26.2% 35.9% -4.1 27
2000-09-10 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1761 1716 35.9% 26.2% 37.8% +4.1 40
2000-09-10 Lillestrom W 4-2 1486 1776 14.5% 17.8% 67.7% +10.0 23
2000-09-10 @ Bryne L 2-4 1776 1486 67.7% 17.8% 14.5% -10.0 30
2000-09-10 Haugesund W 2-0 1802 1606 68.7% 17.3% 14.0% +3.1 36
2000-09-10 @ Stabaek L 0-2 1606 1802 14.0% 17.3% 68.7% -3.2 16
2000-09-10 Odd Grenland W 1-0 1570 1643 33.9% 26.1% 39.9% +4.6 17
2000-09-10 @ Start L 0-1 1643 1570 39.9% 26.1% 33.9% -4.6 29
2000-09-10 Molde L 1-5 1670 1751 32.9% 26.1% 41.0% -11.8 19
2000-09-10 @ Valerenga W 5-1 1751 1670 41.0% 26.1% 32.9% +11.7 36
2000-09-16 Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1883 1712 66.0% 18.6% 15.4% +1.8 49
2000-09-16 @ Rosenborg L 1-2 1712 1883 15.4% 18.6% 66.0% -1.8 27
2000-09-17 Stabaek D 2-2 1741 1805 35.2% 26.2% 38.6% +0.1 35
2000-09-17 @ Brann D 2-2 1805 1741 38.6% 26.2% 35.2% -0.0 37
2000-09-17 Start L 1-2 1603 1574 48.3% 25.0% 26.7% -5.0 16
2000-09-17 @ Haugesund W 2-1 1574 1603 26.7% 25.0% 48.3% +5.0 20
2000-09-17 Moss W 1-0 1766 1671 57.0% 22.5% 20.5% +2.6 33
2000-09-17 @ Lillestrom L 0-1 1671 1766 20.5% 22.5% 57.0% -2.6 28
2000-09-17 Bryne D 1-1 1763 1496 75.9% 13.5% 10.6% -1.6 37
2000-09-17 @ Molde D 1-1 1496 1763 10.6% 13.5% 75.9% +1.6 24
2000-09-17 Tromso W 3-0 1638 1735 30.9% 25.9% 43.3% +13.3 32
2000-09-17 @ Odd Grenland L 0-3 1735 1638 43.3% 25.9% 30.9% -13.3 35
2000-09-17 Valerenga D 1-1 1765 1659 58.4% 21.9% 19.7% -0.9 41
2000-09-17 @ Viking D 1-1 1659 1765 19.7% 21.9% 58.4% +1.0 20
2000-09-20 Start W 2-1 1741 1579 65.0% 19.1% 15.9% +1.8 38
2000-09-20 @ Brann L 1-2 1579 1741 15.9% 19.1% 65.0% -1.8 20
2000-09-24 Stabaek D 0-0 1769 1805 39.2% 26.2% 34.7% -0.1 34
2000-09-24 @ Lillestrom D 0-0 1805 1769 34.7% 26.2% 39.2% +0.1 38
2000-10-01 Odd Grenland L 1-2 1710 1652 52.2% 24.0% 23.8% -5.3 27
2000-10-01 @ Bodo Glimt W 2-1 1652 1710 23.8% 24.0% 52.2% +5.3 35
2000-10-01 Haugesund W 2-1 1743 1598 63.0% 20.0% 17.0% +2.0 41
2000-10-01 @ Brann L 1-2 1598 1743 17.0% 20.0% 63.0% -2.0 16
2000-10-01 Viking L 0-3 1498 1764 15.8% 19.0% 65.1% -5.3 24
2000-10-01 @ Bryne W 3-0 1764 1498 65.1% 19.0% 15.8% +5.3 44
2000-10-01 Molde L 0-1 1668 1761 31.4% 25.9% 42.7% -3.8 28
2000-10-01 @ Moss W 1-0 1761 1668 42.7% 25.9% 31.4% +3.8 40
2000-10-01 Lillestrom L 0-2 1805 1769 49.3% 24.8% 25.9% -10.1 38
2000-10-01 @ Stabaek W 2-0 1769 1805 25.9% 24.8% 49.3% +10.1 37
2000-10-01 Start W 3-2 1722 1577 62.9% 20.0% 17.0% +1.9 38
2000-10-01 @ Tromso L 2-3 1577 1722 17.0% 20.0% 62.9% -1.9 20
2000-10-01 Rosenborg D 2-2 1660 1885 18.6% 21.2% 60.2% +0.8 21
2000-10-01 @ Valerenga D 2-2 1885 1660 60.2% 21.2% 18.6% -0.8 50
2000-10-14 Stabaek L 2-4 1765 1795 40.0% 26.1% 33.8% -6.7 40
2000-10-14 @ Molde W 4-2 1795 1765 33.8% 26.1% 40.0% +6.7 41
2000-10-15 Brann L 1-2 1779 1745 48.9% 24.9% 26.2% -5.0 37
2000-10-15 @ Lillestrom W 2-1 1745 1779 26.2% 24.9% 48.9% +5.0 44
2000-10-15 Valerenga W 4-0 1657 1660 43.8% 25.8% 30.4% +13.2 38
2000-10-15 @ Odd Grenland L 0-4 1660 1657 30.4% 25.8% 43.8% -13.2 21
2000-10-15 Bryne W 9-0 1884 1492 85.9% 8.0% 6.1% +4.8 53
2000-10-15 @ Rosenborg L 0-9 1492 1884 6.1% 8.0% 85.9% -4.8 24
2000-10-15 Bodo Glimt D 2-2 1576 1705 27.1% 25.1% 47.8% +0.4 21
2000-10-15 @ Start D 2-2 1705 1576 47.8% 25.1% 27.1% -0.4 28
2000-10-15 Haugesund W 5-2 1724 1596 60.9% 20.9% 18.2% +4.5 41
2000-10-15 @ Tromso L 2-5 1596 1724 18.2% 20.9% 60.9% -4.5 16
2000-10-15 Moss L 1-2 1770 1665 58.2% 22.0% 19.8% -5.8 44
2000-10-15 @ Viking W 2-1 1665 1770 19.8% 22.0% 58.2% +5.8 31
2000-10-18 Lillestrom L 3-4 1576 1774 20.7% 22.5% 56.8% -2.3 21
2000-10-18 @ Start W 4-3 1774 1576 56.8% 22.5% 20.7% +2.3 40
2000-10-21 Rosenborg D 1-1 1670 1889 19.1% 21.6% 59.4% +1.0 32
2000-10-21 @ Moss D 1-1 1889 1670 59.4% 21.6% 19.1% -1.0 54
2000-10-22 Tromso L 1-4 1704 1728 40.9% 26.1% 33.0% -10.7 28
2000-10-22 @ Bodo Glimt W 4-1 1728 1704 33.0% 26.1% 40.9% +10.7 44
2000-10-22 Molde W 4-0 1750 1758 43.1% 25.9% 31.0% +13.4 47
2000-10-22 @ Brann L 0-4 1758 1750 31.0% 25.9% 43.1% -13.4 40
2000-10-22 Odd Grenland W 1-0 1487 1670 21.9% 23.2% 54.9% +5.8 27
2000-10-22 @ Bryne L 0-1 1670 1487 54.9% 23.2% 21.9% -5.8 38
2000-10-22 Lillestrom W 1-0 1592 1776 21.8% 23.1% 55.1% +5.9 19
2000-10-22 @ Haugesund L 0-1 1776 1592 55.1% 23.1% 21.8% -5.8 40
2000-10-22 Viking D 1-1 1802 1764 49.5% 24.8% 25.8% -0.6 42
2000-10-22 @ Stabaek D 1-1 1764 1802 25.8% 24.8% 49.5% +0.6 45
2000-10-22 Start W 3-0 1647 1574 54.2% 23.4% 22.4% +7.7 24
2000-10-22 @ Valerenga L 0-3 1574 1647 22.4% 23.4% 54.2% -7.7 21

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 2000-08-27 7.80% Start 1562 2 @ Rosenborg 1901 1
2 2000-08-20 12.58% @ Bryne 1477 2 Stabaek 1804 1
3 2000-09-10 14.49% @ Bryne 1486 4 Lillestrom 1776 2
4 2000-07-23 15.96% Odd Grenland 1630 2 @ Stabaek 1791 1
5 2000-07-05 17.46% Start 1569 4 @ Bodo Glimt 1706 3
6 2000-08-06 17.49% Viking 1761 2 @ Rosenborg 1898 1
7 2000-08-02 19.10% @ Bryne 1474 1 Valerenga 1692 0
8 2000-10-15 19.79% Moss 1665 2 @ Viking 1770 1
9 2000-05-07 19.81% @ Bryne 1480 2 Moss 1689 0
10 2000-07-02 20.01% Moss 1681 3 @ Molde 1784 0
11 2000-04-29 20.55% Molde 1772 1 @ Rosenborg 1867 0
12 2000-10-22 21.79% @ Haugesund 1592 1 Lillestrom 1776 0
13 2000-10-22 21.92% @ Bryne 1487 1 Odd Grenland 1670 0
14 2000-09-09 23.09% @ Tromso 1724 2 Rosenborg 1894 0
15 2000-10-01 23.75% Odd Grenland 1652 2 @ Bodo Glimt 1710 1
16 2000-08-02 24.24% Tromso 1736 3 @ Stabaek 1790 2
17 2000-08-13 25.14% Bodo Glimt 1709 2 @ Brann 1753 0
18 2000-04-16 25.29% @ Odd Grenland 1608 2 Stabaek 1754 0
19 2000-10-01 25.94% Lillestrom 1769 2 @ Stabaek 1805 0
20 2000-10-15 26.19% Brann 1745 2 @ Lillestrom 1779 1
21 2000-07-30 26.40% @ Odd Grenland 1636 2 Brann 1772 0
22 2000-09-17 26.70% Start 1574 2 @ Haugesund 1603 1
23 2000-07-30 26.87% Molde 1739 1 @ Viking 1767 0
24 2000-04-09 26.90% @ Bryne 1480 4 Start 1611 2
25 2000-08-06 27.05% @ Bryne 1480 1 Haugesund 1610 0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 2000-08-13 18.04 @ Lillestrom 6 1768 46.73% Tromso 0 1750 27.95% 25.32%
2 2000-08-02 17.53 Bodo Glimt 6 1691 31.30% @ Moss 1 1681 42.80% 25.90%
3 2000-07-02 16.66 Moss 3 1681 20.01% @ Molde 0 1784 57.83% 22.16%
4 2000-05-21 15.85 @ Stabaek 7 1770 44.13% Brann 1 1771 30.13% 25.74%
5 2000-08-27 15.59 @ Molde 7 1735 44.81% Bodo Glimt 1 1732 29.55% 25.64%
6 2000-04-19 15.44 @ Moss 4 1678 36.63% Tromso 0 1731 37.14% 26.23%
7 2000-08-06 13.46 @ Odd Grenland 3 1642 30.14% Molde 0 1745 44.12% 25.74%
8 2000-10-22 13.44 @ Brann 4 1750 43.11% Molde 0 1758 31.02% 25.87%
9 2000-09-17 13.26 @ Odd Grenland 3 1638 30.88% Tromso 0 1735 43.27% 25.85%
10 2000-10-15 13.22 @ Odd Grenland 4 1657 43.81% Valerenga 0 1660 30.41% 25.78%
11 2000-07-16 13.21 Brann 6 1751 27.21% @ Viking 2 1775 47.65% 25.14%
12 2000-05-03 12.79 @ Stabaek 6 1743 46.07% Bodo Glimt 1 1730 28.49% 25.44%
13 2000-05-16 12.73 Stabaek 4 1757 45.41% @ Haugesund 0 1645 29.04% 25.55%
14 2000-07-05 12.52 @ Stabaek 6 1786 46.90% Molde 1 1767 27.81% 25.29%
15 2000-07-05 12.33 Viking 5 1763 38.72% @ Moss 1 1698 35.09% 26.20%
16 2000-08-20 12.26 @ Bodo Glimt 3 1719 34.79% Lillestrom 0 1786 39.03% 26.19%
17 2000-09-10 11.75 Molde 5 1751 41.00% @ Valerenga 1 1670 32.92% 26.07%
18 2000-05-07 11.52 @ Bryne 2 1480 19.81% Moss 0 1689 58.17% 22.03%
19 2000-08-09 10.89 Stabaek 4 1785 32.20% @ Viking 1 1767 41.80% 26.00%
20 2000-09-09 10.73 @ Tromso 2 1724 23.09% Rosenborg 0 1894 53.16% 23.75%
21 2000-10-22 10.72 Tromso 4 1728 33.00% @ Bodo Glimt 1 1704 40.92% 26.08%
22 2000-08-13 10.27 Bodo Glimt 2 1709 25.14% @ Brann 0 1753 50.32% 24.54%
23 2000-04-16 10.24 @ Odd Grenland 2 1608 25.29% Stabaek 0 1754 50.13% 24.59%
24 2000-10-01 10.11 Lillestrom 2 1769 25.94% @ Stabaek 0 1805 49.27% 24.79%
25 2000-07-30 10.01 @ Odd Grenland 2 1636 26.40% Brann 0 1772 48.68% 24.93%